A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI

Similar documents
ST-Elevation MI: Update on Bivalirudin and DES

Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Novel Anticoagulation Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Update on the management of STEMI. Elliot Rapaport, M.D. San Francisco, CA December 14, 2007

Bivalirudin Clinical Trials Update Evidence and Future Perspectives

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

STEMI Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Bivalirudin should be indicated for all patients with STEMI. Adnan Kastrati Deutsches Herzzentrum, Munich, Germany

Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for PCI Pharmacology: Role of Bivalirudin in High-Risk PCI

The Interventional Trials of the Year: (TCT, AHA, and ACC)

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

PCI Update Qesaria 2009

From STEMIs to Stents: Updates in PCI practice

Pathophysiology of ACS

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

DES in Diabetic Patients

What is new in the Treatment of STEMI? Malcolm R. Bell, MBBS Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Αγγειοπλαστική σε διαβητικούς ασθενείς

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

Stent Thrombosis Importance of Pharmacotherapy

Update from the Tryton IDE study

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Is the role of bivalirudin established?

bivalirudin 250mg powder for concentrate for solution for injection or infusion (Angiox) SMC No. (638/10) The Medicines Company

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Primary PCI State of the Art. A/Prof Michael Nguyen Fremantle Hospital/Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Australia JCR Meeting Busan 2014

PTCA 1979: : I

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

Primary PCI in patients with STEMI Abbott Vascular. All rights reserved.

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 9, 2013

MULTIcentre evaluation of Single high-dose. acute myocardial infarction study

ANGIOPLASY SUMMIT 2007 TCT ASIA PACIFIC. Seoul, Korea: April The problem is exaggerated: Data from Real World Registries

Drug Eluting Stents Sometimes Fail ESC Stockholm 29 Set 2010 Stent Thrombosis Alaide Chieffo

MINERVA MEDICA COPYRIGHT. Aspirin is accepted as standard antiplatelet. Dual antiplatelet therapy for primary and secondary prevention

Unprotected LM intervention

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Timing of Anti-Platelet Therapy for ACS (EARLY-ACS & ACUITY) Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, FACC

Late Loss Is The Single Best Parameter For Estimating Stent-Based Restenosis Resistance

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

RESTENOSIS Facing up to the problem

Drug Eluting Stents: Bifurcation and Left Main Approach

THE CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE OF THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROM IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Christian Spaulding. for the TYPHOON Investigators

Is there a real need for new agents to optimize efficacy/safety balance

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Antiplatelet Therapy: how, why, when? For Coronary Stenting

BMS vs. DES vs. CABG

Optimal antithrombotic therapy:

Protection of side branch is essential in treating bifurcation lesions: overview

Element Clinical Program Perseus Late Breaking News and the Platinum Study Design

Drug eluting balloons in CAD

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Clinical Considerations for CTO

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

Trial Update- TOTAL. Jonathan Byrne

Left Main Intervention: Where are we in 2015?

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

LM stenting - Cypher

Asian AMI Registry Session The 17 th Joint Meeting of Coronary Revascularization (JCR 2017) Busan, Korea Dec 8 th 2017

DES In-stent Restenosis

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

PCI for LMCA lesions A Review of latest guidelines and relevant evidence

The interventional Trials of the Year: (TCT, AHA, and ACC)

Guideline for STEMI. Reperfusion at a PCI-Capable Hospital

In-Stent Restenosis. Can we kill it?

Béla MERKELY MD, PhD, DSc, FESC. Stent thrombosis: patophysiology, predisposing factors, definition, classification, prevention and treatment

Current Status of BioresorbableScaffolds: Moving Forward or Backwards?

COMBAT- Revised Protocol

Surgery Grand Rounds

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Conflict of interest :None. Meta-analysis. Zhangwei Chen, MD

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Intra-Procedural Stent Thrombosis

The PASEO (PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent in Primary Angioplasty) Randomized Trial

Utilities and Pitfalls of Composite and Surrogate Endpoints in Clinical Trials. Cardiovascular Research Foundation Columbia University Medical Center

CYPHER (Polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting DES) New Stent Platforms. Campbell Rogers, M.D. Chief Technology Officer

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

TCT mdbuyline.com Clinical Trial Results Summary

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

Transcription:

HORIZONS-AMI: A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI Gregg W. Stone MD Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Disclosures Gregg W. Stone Research support from The Medicines Company, Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular

The 1 st Debate: Treatment of Acute Coronary Thrombosis and STEMI rt-pa PTCA

23 Randomized Trials of PCI vs. Lysis N = 7,739 p=0.0002 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 p=0.0002 Death Reinfarction Hemorrhagic stroke Total stroke Keeley, Grines. Lancet 2003;361:13-20

13 RCTs of BMS vs. Balloon PTCA in AMI N=6,922 30 day events Bare metal stents Balloon angioplasty RR [95% CI] RR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.74, P Value Mortality 2.9% 3.0% 0.83 1.27] 0.92 Reinfarction 2.0% 2.2% 0.61 [0.66, 1.27] 0.60 TVR 3.1% 5.1% 0.0001 [0.47, 0.77] 6-12 month events 0.98 [0.79, Mortality 5.1% 5.2% 0.82 1.10] Reinfarction 3.7% 3.9% 0.94 [0.74, 1.20] 0.61 0.62 TVR 11.3% 18.4% <0.0001 [0.55, 0.69] 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 BMS better PTCA better De Luca G et al. Int J Cardiol.. 2007;119:306-9. 9.

Massachusetts State Registry 2-year mortality (propensity adjusted) in 1298 matched pairs (2596 pts) with STEMI at 21 hospitals between 4/03 9/04 Death (adjusted) (%) 30 20 10 2% mortality at 30 days! 3% mortality at 1-year! 1 BMS (n=1298) DES (n=1298) P=0.008 11.6% 8.5% 0 0 30 180 365 730 Days after Initial Procedure Drug-Eluting Stent No. at risk 1298 1289 1250 1227 1213 Cum. incidence (%) 0.7 3.7 5.5 6.5 8.5 Bare-Metal Stent No. at risk 1298 1292 1223 1194 1173 Cum. incidence (%) 0.5 5.8 8.0 9.6 11.6 Mauri L et al. NEJM 2008;359:1330-42

11 DES vs. BMS RCTs in AMI (n=3,607) Death at 12 Months Study DES n/n BMS n/n OR (fixed) 95% CI Weight % OR (fixed) 95% CI DiLorenzo et al 7/180 6/90 10.20 0.57 [0.18, 1.74] BASKET-AMI 6/143 6/74 10.05 0.50 [0.15, 1.60] DEDICATION 16/313 8/313 10.07 2.05 [0.87, 4.87] Diaz de la Llera et al 3/60 2/54 2.65 1.37 [0.22, 8.52] HAAMU-STENT 8/82 4/82 4.79 2.11 [0.61, 7.30] MISSION 2/158 4/152 5.34 0.47 [0.09, 2.63] PASSION 16/310 20/309 25.19 0.79 [0.40, 1.55] SELECTION 1/40 3/40 3.88 0.32 [0.03, 3.18] SESAMI 3/160 6/160 7.81 0.49 [0.12, 2.00] STRATEGY 7/87 8/88 9.70 0.88 [0.30, 2.53] TYPHOON 8/355 8/357 10.34 1.01 [0.37, 2.71] Total (95% CI) 77/1888 75/1719 100.00 4.1% 4.4% Test for heterogeneity: I 2 = 0% Favors DES Favors BMS 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 0.91 [0.66, 1.27] P=0.59 De Luca G et al. Int J Cardiol 2008

11 DES vs. BMS RCTs in AMI (n=3,607) TVR at 12 Months Study DES n/n BMS n/n OR (fixed) 95% CI Weight % OR (fixed) 95% CI DiLorenzo et al 7/180 14/90 8.40 0.22 [0.09, 0.57] BASKET-AMI 10/143 9/74 5.17 0.54 [0.21, 1.40] DEDICATION 16/313 41/313 18.22 0.36 [0.20, 0.65] Diaz de la Llera et al 0/60 3/54 1.71 0.12 [0.01, 2.41] HAAMU-STENT 3/82 8/82 3.61 0.35 [0.09, 1.37] MISSION 5/158 17/152 7.86 0.26 [0.09, 0.72] PASSION 16/310 23/309 10.23 0.68 [0.35, 1.31] SELECTION 2/40 13/40 5.79 0.11 [0.02, 0.52] SESAMI 7/160 20/160 8.96 0.32 [0.13, 0.78] STRATEGY 8/87 21/88 8.88 0.32 [0.13, 0.78] TYPHOON 20/355 48/357 21.16 0.38 [0.22, 0.66] Total (95% CI) 94/1888 217/1719 100.00 Test for heterogeneity: I 2 = 0% 5.0% 12.6% = 7.6% 0.1 0.2 0.5 Favors DES 1 2 5 10 Favors BMS 0.36 [0.28, 0.47] P<0.0001 De Luca G et al. Int J Cardiol 2008

DES in AMI: The TYPHOON Trial Primary Endpoint (TVF*) Through 360 Days TVF (%) 25 20 15 10 5 0 2.8 3.1 SES BMS Routine Angio FU 6.2 4.2 Time (days) 49% P = 0.004 14.3 7.3 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 * Defined as target vessel-related cardiac death, ReMI or ischemia driven TVR Spaulding C et al. NEJM 2006;355:1093-104. 104.

Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in AMI 3602 pts with STEMI with symptom onset 12 hours Aspirin, thienopyridine R 1:1 UFH + GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (abciximab or eptifibatide) Bivalirudin monotherapy (± provisional GP IIb/IIIa) Emergent angiography, followed by triage to CABG Primary PCI Medical Rx 3006 pts eligible for stent randomization R 3:1 Paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent Bare metal EXPRESS stent Clinical FU at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly through 5 years; angio FU at 13 months

HORIZONS: 30 Day Adverse Events P<0.001 P = 0.90 P = 0.002 *Not related to CABG ** Plat cnt <100,000 cells/mm 3 Stone GW et al. NEJM 2008;358:2218-30 30

HORIZONS: 1-Year All-Cause Mortality 5 Bivalirudin alone (n=1800) Heparin + GPIIb/IIIa (n=1802) 4.8% Mortality (%) Number at risk Bivalirudin alone Heparin+GPIIb/IIIa 4 3 2 1 0 3.1% 2.1% = 1.0% P=0.049 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time in Months 1800 1705 1684 1669 1520 1802 1678 1663 1646 1486 = 1.4% 3.4% Diff [95%CI] = -1.5% [-2.8,-0.1] HR [95%CI] = 0.69 [0.50, 0.97] P=0.029 Stone GW et al. NEJM 2008;358:2218-30 30 Stone GW. TCT 2008

Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in AMI Primary Medical Rx 193 Primary CABG 62 Deferred PCI 2 Index PCI, not eligible - PTCA only 119 - Stented 220 93.1% of all stented pts were randomized 3602 pts with STEMI R 3:1 R 1:1 3006 pts eligible for stent rand. UFH + GPI (n=1802) Bivalirudin (n=1800) Randomized TAXUS DES N=2257 EXPRESS BMS N=749 18 53 Withdrew Lost to FU 7 27 1 year FU N=2186 (96.9%) N=715 (95.5%)

One-Year All-Cause Mortality 5 TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749) Mortality (%) 4 3 2 1 3.5% 3.5% HR [95%CI] = 0.99 [0.64,1.55] P=0.98 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number at risk TAXUS DES EXPRESS BMS Time in Months 2257 2180 2161 2147 1949 749 716 712 702 648 Stone GW. In press.

Stent Thrombosis (%) 4 3 2 1 0 Number at risk PES BMS Stent Thrombosis (ARC Definite or Probable) Paclitaxel-eluting stents (n=2238) Bare metal stents (n=744) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time in Months 2238 2123 2098 2079 1885 744 701 694 683 629 Stone GW. In press. HR [95%CI] = 0.93 [0.59,1.47] P=0.77 3.4% 3.2%

Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Ischemic TLR Ischemic TLR (%) Number at risk TAXUS DES EXPRESS BMS 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Diff [95%CI] = -3.0% [-5.1,[ -0.9] HR [95%CI] = 0.59 [0.43, 0.83] P=0.002 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time in Months TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749) 2257 2132 2098 2069 1868 749 697 675 658 603 7.5% 4.5% Stone GW. In press.

Binary Analysis Segment Restenosis at 13 Months Patient and Lesion Level Analysis* RR [95%CI] = 0.44 [0.33, 0.57] P<0.0001 RR [95%CI] = 0.44 [0.33, 0.57] P<0.0001 Major 2 endpoint * ITT: Includes all stent randomized lesions, whether or not a stent was implanted, and whether or not non study stents were placed ** Any lesion with restenosis per pt restenosis Stone GW. In press.

Multivariable Predictors of 1-Year 1 TLR (BMS Express patients, N=734) Variable HR (95% CI) P-value Total lesion length 1.03 [1.01, 1.05] 0.002 Baseline RVD 0.22 [0.11, 0.42] <0.0001 Insulin-treated diabetes 3.17 [1.23, 8.18] 0.02 Lesion ulceration 4.08 [1.53,10.88] 0.005 Stone GW. ACC2009.

Multivariable Predictors of 1-Year 1 TLR (BMS Express patients, N=734) Variable Score HR (95% CI) P-value Total lesion length 40 mm 2 5.28 [1.73,16.15] 0.004 Baseline RVD 3.0 mm 1 3.27 [1.63, 6.55] 0.0008 Insulin-treated diabetes 1 3.00 [1.17, 7.66] 0.02 Lesion ulceration 1 3.45 [1.30, 9.16] 0.01 Killip class 2-4 1 2.50 [1.20, 5.20] 0.01 Stone GW. ACC2009.

1-Year TLR According to BMS Risk Score (N=2915) N=946 (32.5%) N=1520 (52.1%) N=449 (15.4%) Stone GW. ACC2009.

Multivariable Predictors of 13 Month In-segment Restenosis (BMS Express patients, N=290) Variable Score HR (95% CI) P-value Total lesion length 40 mm Total lesion length 30 - <40 mm 2 6.64 [1.18,37.46] 0.03 1 3.40 [1.10,10.51] 0.03 Baseline RVD 3.0 mm 1 4.20 [2.18, 8.11] <0.0001 Age 65.0 years 1 1.78 [0.98, 3.24] 0.06 Stone GW. ACC2009.

13 Month In-segment Restenosis According to BMS Risk Score (N=1194) N=296 (24.8%) N=531 (44.7%) N=367 (30.7%) Stone GW. ACC2009.

Stent Selection in STEMI In pts with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, use of TAXUS rather than BMS results in: Comparable rates of stent thrombosis, reinfarction and death through 1 year Significant reductions in TLR, TVR and angiographic late loss and restenosis,, in all lesions except for those at low risk for restenosis Longer term follow-up is required to comprehensively assess the late safety and efficacy profile of DES in STEMI