JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 22 September 2010 J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/jcm.01182-10 Copyright 2010, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved. 1 2 Vancomycin MIC for Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus sp.: Evaluation of the Broth Microdilution and Etest Methods 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Rodrigo M. Paiva 1*, Alice B. Mombach Pinheiro Machado 1, Alexandre P. Zavascki 2, +, Afonso L. Barth 1,3, +. + Both Senior authors, who have contributed equally. Running title: Vancomycin MIC for MRCoNS. 1 Unidade de Microbiologia e Biologia Molecular, Serviço de Patologia Clínica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre; 2 Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre; 3 Departamento de Análises, Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul *Corresponding author: Rodrigo M. Paiva, Unidade de Microbiologia e Biologia Molecular, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2350 Ramiro Barcelos Street, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90035-903, Phone: +55 51 3359-8860/ Fax: +55 51 3359-8310, E-mail: rpaiva@hcpa.ufrgs.br 1
23 24 25 26 27 28 ABSTRACT Vancomycin MIC results were determined by broth microdilution method (BMD) and by Etest on 130 methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci bloodstream isolates from a tertiary hospital. The majority (98.5%) of MIC results by BMD were 1 µg/ml in contrast to MIC by Etest (72.3% was 1.5 µg/ml). The MICs obtained by the Etest were, in general, one to twofold higher than MICs by BMD. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 2
47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens during the last decade, particularly in nosocomial bloodstream infections (4). Resistance to methicillin in CoNS is very common among isolates recovered from hospitalized individuals (4, 19). For this reason, vancomycin is usually the drug of choice for treatment of infections by methicillin-resistant CoNS (MRCoNS) (17). A reduction in the efficacy of vancomycin has been described in studies with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections treated with this antibiotic, and it has been suggested that slight increases in vancomycin MICs between 1 and 2 µg/ml, which are within the susceptible range, may be related to suboptimal clinical outcomes (12, 16). Therefore, the determination of MIC of vancomycin has been recommended for these pathogens (3). Some of these studies have used the broth microdilution method (BMD) for determining vancomycin MICs, while others have used the commercial Etest technique (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). It has been reported that Etest provides higher MICs than those obtained with BMD in S. aureus, mainly MRSA (14, 15). Nevertheless, there is no study comparing both methodologies for determination of MIC of vancomycin in CoNS. Considering the increasing incidence of MRCoNS, the need for MIC determination for vancomycin and the absence of studies assessing the performance of Etest in these organisms, we aimed to compare the Etest and BMD for determination of the MIC of vancomycin in MRCoNS isolates. 130 clinical isolates of CoNS recovered from blood of patients hospitalized from May/2004 to August/2005 at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre were analyzed. Only one isolate per patient were included. Blood cultures were performed using BacT/Alert (biomérieux, Marcy L Etoile, France). The colony morphology, Gram stain reaction, catalase test and absence of the coagulase enzyme were used to identify CoNS. Isolates 3
72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 were identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis by PCR, with primers for tuf (10). The isolates that were not identified as S. epidermidis by PCR were identified using the API ID 32 STAPH (biomérieux, Marcy L Etoile, France) semi-automated system, according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Results yielding a quality of identification of 85% or higher were accepted. The presence of meca gene was assessed by PCR using specific primers (13). MICs of vancomycin were determined in duplicate by the reference BMD as recommended by CLSI, using in-house-prepared panels. The following dilutions of vancomycin: 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25 and 0.125 µg/ml were tested. The standard Etest procedure was performed using Mueller-Hinton agar (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.) with an inoculum density equivalent to 0.5 McFarland. Vancomycin Etest strips were placed onto the agar with sterile forceps. The cultures were incubated for 24h at 35ºC. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used for quality control (3). The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the MICs obtained by Etest and BMD. Two sets of comparisons were done: one with the exact MIC value by Etest and the other rounding the MIC determined by Etest up to the next dilution. All 130 isolates of CoNS proved to be meca positive and were identified as follows: 87 (66.9%) S. epidermidis, 13 (10.0%) S. haemolyticus, 12 (9.2%) S. hominis and 11 (8.5%) S. capitis. Seven isolates (5.4%) were not identified to the species level. The MICs of vancomycin ranged from 0.25 to 2 µg/ml by BMD and from 0.38 to 3 µg/ml by Etest. No discrepancies were observed in duplicates performed by BMD. The MIC 50 and MIC 90 for vancomycin were both 1 µg/ml by BMD and 1.5 and 2 µg/ml, respectively, by Etest (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Most MICs determined by Etest were 1.5 µg/ml (94 isolates, 72.3%) while most MICs were 1 µg/ml (128 isolates, 98.5%) by BMD. One hundred thirteen (86.9%) and five (3.8%) isolates presented a MIC by Etest one and twofold dilutions higher than by BMD, respectively. 4
97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 Only 10 isolates (7.7%) presented the same MIC using the two methods (Fig. 1). When the Etest MICs 0.38, 0.75, 1.5, and 3 µg/ml were converted to 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 µg/ml, respectively, there was an even higher discrepancy between the methods. In this case, almost all MRCoNS had MICs 1 µg/ml (124 isolates, 95.4%) (Fig. 2). MICs determined by Etest were higher than those determined by BMD for all MRCoNS species, when analyzed separately (Table 1). No isolate had MIC higher than 4 µg/ml regardless the method used. In the last two decades, a worldwide increase in the number of CoNS with decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides (mainly vancomycin) has been described (6, 7). The emergence of decreased vancomycin susceptibility among staphylococci has led to evaluations of susceptibility tests performed by clinical laboratories to avoid imprecise vancomycin MIC determinations. Although the BMD is the reference method for MIC determination, the Etest is an attractive option as it is easy to perform. However, the results of the present study demonstrate that Etest provides MICs of vancomycin higher than MICs determined by CLSI reference method (BMD). We found that the MICs by Etest were one to twofold dilutions higher than by BMD. These findings have been reported for S. aureus, indicating discrepancies among different methods for MIC determinations (8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 18). However, studies comparing MIC methods for CoNS were lacking. It is of note that the same discrepancies between Etest and BMD methods described for S. aureus were also observed in this study for CoNS. Moreover, the differences between the MIC methods were confirmed independently of the CoNS species identified. A limitation of this study is that MICs of vancomycin for MRCoNS from our report were lower than MICs described in other studies (2, 5), so we could not precisely evaluate the performance of Etest in organisms with higher MICs. Actually, most 5
122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 (86.2%) S. epidermidis presented MICs by BMD = 1 µg/ml and only 1.1% MIC = 2 µg/ml. Among S. haemolyticus, most MICs by Etest were around 1 to 2 µg/ml, despite the fact that members of this species are usually more resistant to glycopeptides (1). In conclusion, the commercial Etest method overestimates MIC values when compared to BMD, as described for S. aureus. Although relatively infrequent, MRCoNS with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin are a potential concern if they present the same impact in clinical outcomes, as for S. aureus. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was supported by a Grant from Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos (FIPE) Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Vancomycin Etest strips were kindly provided by Pfizer. A.L.B. (309410/2007-0) and A.P.Z. (301829/2008-0) receive research fellow from CNPq. 6
147 REFERENCES 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 1. Bannerman, T. L., and S. J. Peacock. 2007. Staphylococcus, micrococcus, and other catalase-positive cocci, p. 390-411. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, J. H. Jorgensen, and M. L. Landry (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology. 9th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. 2. Center, K. J., A. C. Reboli, R. Hubler, G. L. Rodgers, and S. S. Long. 2003. Decreased vancomycin susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in a neonatal intensive care unit: evidence of spread of Staphylococcus warneri. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4660-4665. 3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 8th ed. CLSI document M07-A8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 4. Diekema D. J., M. A. Pfaller, F. J. Schmitz, J. Smayevsky, J. Bell, R. N. Jones, M. Beach, and the SENTRY Participants Group. 2001. Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:S114- S132. 5. Gales, A. C., H. S. Sader, J. Ribeiro, C. Zoccoli, A. Barth, and A. C. Pignatari. 2009. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY program (2005-2008). Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 13:90-98. 7
172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 6. Garrett, D. O., E. Jochimsen, K. Murfitt, B. Hill, S. McAllister, P. Nelson, R. V. Spera, R. K. Sall, F. C. Tenover, J. Johnston, B. Zimmer, and W. R. Jarvis. 1999. The emergence of decreased susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 20:167-170. 7. Hope, R., D. M. Livermore, G. Brick, M. Lillie, and R. Reynolds on behalf of the BSAC working parties on resistance surveillance. 2008. Non-susceptibility trends among staphylococci from bacteraemias in the UK and Ireland, 2001-06. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62:ii65-ii74. 8. Hsu, D. I., L. K. Hidayat, R. Quist, J. Hindler, A. Karlsson, A. Yusof, and A. Wong-Beringer. 2008. Comparison of method-specific vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration values and their predictability for treatment outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 32:378-385. 9. Jones, R. N. 2006. Microbiological features of vancomycin in the 21st century: minimum inhibitory concentration creep, bactericidal/static activity, and applied breakpoints to predict clinical outcomes or detect resistant strains. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42:S13-S24. 10. Martineau, F., F. J. Picard, P. H. Roy, M. Ouellette, and M. G. Bergeron. 1996. Species-specific and ubiquitous DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2888-2893. 11. Mason, E. O., L. B. Lamberth, W. A. Hammerman, K. G. Hulten, J. Versalovic, and S. L. Kaplan. 2009. Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus 8
196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 aureus vary by detection method and have subtly increased in a pediatric population since 2005. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1628-1630. 12. Moise-Broder, P. A., G. Sakoulas, G. M. Eliopoulos, J. J. Schentag, A. Forrest, and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 2004. Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1700-1705. 13. Mombach Pinheiro Machado, A. B., K. C. Reiter, R. M. Paiva, and A. L. Barth. 2007. Distribution of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types I, II, III and IV in coagulase-negative staphylococci from patients attending a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. J. Med. Microbiol. 56:1328-1333. 14. Prakash, V., J. S. Lewis II, and J. H. Jorgensen. 2008. Vancomycin MICs for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates differ based upon the susceptibility test method used. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:4528. 15. Sader, H. S., P. R. Rhomberg, and R. N. Jones. 2009. Nine-hospital study comparing broth microdilution and Etest method results for vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3162-3165. 16. Sakoulas, G., P. A. Moise-Broder, J. Schentag, A. Forrest, R. C. Moellering, Jr., and G. M. Eliopoulos. 2004. Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2398-2402. 17. Srinivasan, A., J. D. Dick, and T. M. Perl. 2002. Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:430-438. 9
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 18. Swenson, J. M., K. F. Anderson, D. R. Lonsway, A. Thompson, S. K. McAllister, B. M. Limbago, R. B. Carey, F. C. Tenover and J. B. Patel. 2009. Accuracy of commercial and reference susceptibility testing methods for detecting vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:2013-2017. 19. Tacconelli, E., M. Tumbarello, K. G. Donati, M. Bettio, T. Spanu, F. Leone, L. A. Sechi, S. Zanetti, G. Fadda and R. Cauda. 2001. Glycopeptide resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci that cause bacteremia: epidemiological and clinical findings from a case-control study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:1628-1635. 10