ASSESSING SPRAYER TECHNOLOGIES IN WASHINGTON VINEYARDS

Similar documents
Managing Aerial Spray Drift. by Paul E. Sumner Extension Engineer

Indicate (X) client(s) to whom this final report is submitted. Replace any of these with other relevant clients if required. FINAL REPORT FOR 2012

Nutrient Uptake Trial: Determination of Nutrient Uptake in Grapevines

Buran COMMERCIAL SOLUTION. GUARANTEE: Garlic powder 15% REGISTRATION NUMBER PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS ACT READ THE LABEL BEFORE USING

By G A MATTHEWS and R P BATEMAN. Summary

Minimizing Spray Drift and Spray Drift Damage

Timing of Burn Down Herbicides Before Overseeding

HERE ARE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR CUSTOMERS MOST OFTEN ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT Calcium-25

2008 PMTP Field Tour Agenda. Pest Management Transition Project

Development of Tenacity 4SC for Weed Control Recommendations with Spray Adjuvants

Care Chemicals & Formulators. Librel BMX. Technical Information. = Registered trademark of BASF group Multi-Micronutrient EDTA Chelate.

Effect of Field Plot Design on the Efficacy of Boom Sprayer

SNEEZE ZONE BACKGROUND INFORMATION MATERIALS TO RUN THE ACTIVITY. Teacher s notes

Effect of Nozzles on Fungicide Efficacy for Control of Fusarium Head Blight on Barley

THINK LATERAL! VALOIS PHARMA SIDE ACTUATED NASAL SPRAY DEVICE. Teva Miami on Oct.1, /

Improving the management of white mold in dry beans. Michael Wunsch, plant pathologist NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

Apples and Pears. Above 2.7. Above 2.4

D. Flaherty, S. Sibbett, K. Kelley, J. Dibble, and R. Rice

Agricultural & Industrial Sprayers, HAV Sprayer Brochure

Evaluation of Syngenta products to control of pink and gray snow mold in Washington, Idaho, and Montana

Improving the management of white mold in dry beans. Michael Wunsch, plant pathologist NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

Bystander & Resident Exposure to Plant Protection Products

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

FIELD CASE STUDIES OF DICAMBA MOVEMENT TO SOYBEANS. Chris Boerboom 1

Willmar Air Ride Sprayer Service Manual

Residual herbicides in Liberty Link soybeans at Rosemount, MN Treatment Date May 23 June 17 June 23 July 10

Final 2013 Delaware Soybean Board Report

1. To prevent and correct zinc deficiency in most agricultural, horticultural and ornamental crops. Recommended for soil and foliar application.

Final Report. Control of Mesquite-Pricklypear Complex with Aerial Application of Herbicides,

21 st Century Challenges in Fertilizer Coatings

Getting the most from your foliar feeding

GRAPEVINE DISEASES. Formulation Information & Adjuvants. Online Guide To. Virginia Tech

Commercial chicken vaccination: part 1 spray and aerosol usage

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume II, Issue 5 October 05

Water-Soluble Fertilizer Fertigation and Foliar Application. The Authority in Potassium and Magnesium

AIR WALKER TRAINER USER MANUAL SF-E902

Necrotic Leaf Blotch A disorder of Pacific Rose. Prepared by Ross Wilson AgFirst April 2016

2014 Black Dot Foliar Fungicides (200 Series)

Aphid Management on Head Lettuce Using Imidacloprid and Foliar Insecticides

SP 131 NONIONIC SPREADER/PENETRANT

Foliar fungicide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

2015 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut, Jay, FL

Real World Variables University Wind Studies Part 1. Randy Montgomery

USE OF SURFACTANT WITH DIFFERENT VOLUMES OF FUNGICIDE APPLICATION IN SOYBEAN CULTURE

Efficacy of Amincocyclopyrachlor for Annual Broomweed Control

ZINC FERTILIZER GROUP / MISSTOF GROEP 2. Reg. No. B4255 Act/Wet No 36 of/van 1947

PROFESSIONAL GRADE FITNESS CABLES INSTRUCTION MANUAL AND EXERCISE GUIDE. Engineered by

Spray Nozzles for Grass Weed Control

Table 1 Disease Ratings* May 22 May 30 Tst Treatment and rate/a Inc Sev Fld Sev Inc Sev Fld Sev Bu/A** LSD P=

Insecticide Efficacy for Pecan Aphids. Larry Blackwell 1 Brad Lewis 1,2 Tiffany Johnson 1 1 New Mexico State University 2 New Mexico Dept.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Nitrogen and sulfur for all crops! Ef f icie. Protein PIASAN -S 25/6. The yield multiplier NITROGEN + SULPHUR. The future of fertilisation.

3 Part Neck? Movements

Muscle Size & Strength

INSECTICIDE TRIALS FOR ONION THRIPS (THRIPS TABACI) CONTROL 2002

Pesticide Formulations

TORNADO AIR BIKE SF-B2706 USER MANUAL

Caramba. Fungicide. CARAMBA is a registered trade-mark of BASF Agro B.V., used with permission by BASF Canada Inc BASF Canada Inc.

Ohio Vegetable & Small Fruit Research & Development Program 2007 Report on Research

HOW TO USE YOUR INSTANYL MULTI-DOSE NASAL SPRAY

Kestrel Page 1 of 5. Kestrel. Systemic fungicide for the control of diseases in wheat, barley and ryegrass seed crops

CoRoN Enhancement of Pumpkin Fungicides: Effects on Foliar Diseases. Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt, University of Tennessee

SIMPLICITY - PERFORMANCE - EXCELLENCE. Equipment for implantology and surgery

Totally lightweight, totally flexible, totally titanium.

Merial Vaccination Technologies & Services Equipment Portfolio

Management of Poa annua on Overseeded Fairways

Lesson 01 Learning About ASL and It s History Toby Fitch

Isometric Shoulder Flexion

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Early Warning Scouting Program Project Report October 2007

Control of Mesquite-Pricklypear Complex with Aerial Application of Herbicides,

COTTON HARVEST AID. Cotton Alliance Research Progress Report 2010

Finding your perfect garment size is easy

Group 3 Fungicide. For use in disease control in the following crops: barley, oats, rye, sugar beets, sugarcane, triticale, and wheat

Technical Report No A

15 cm Reservoir Tubing. 210 cm Tubing

School of Applied Social Sciences Durham University 42 Old Elvet Durham DH1 3HN UNITED KINGDOM

CONGRATULATIONS ON PURCHASING YOUR TOTALLY WICKED ARC 5 ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE KIT.

Ankle Rehabilitation Program

12 Foliar Feeding Ideas for Extra Yields

THE GREEN GUIDE TO A HEALTHiER BEDROOM

Aerobic Lateral Trainer

Treatment Date May 27 June 16 July 13 July 21 Application preemergence early post sequential sequential

Potted Colour Blend (Staged Nutrient Release)

Insecticide Degradation vs SWD Population Dynamics in Northwest Washington Blueberry

Practical, Comfortable & Reliable Continence Care

The (COSHH) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations may apply to the use of this product at work.

Pheromone Based Mating Disruption

Granulation SyStEmS For waxes & oleochemicals

The Body s Transport System (pp )

NO FOAM NUTRIENT FOLIAR SOLUTION 8-8-2

Term 1: Revision Guide G5

2013 Progress Report

Plasma exchange. Information for patients Sheffield Kidney Institute (Renal Unit)

Balance GT/Balance Bean/LL Systems in Soybeans at Rochester, MN Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Annette Kyllo and Matthew Bauer

Texans strength and conditioning coach Dan Riley is back for another installment of his Fitness Corner column.

FROM SOLVENT TO AQUEOUS COATINGS. (Out of the Frying Pan...) Ralph E. Pondell. Coating Place, Inc. P.O. Box

P2 P7 SCN 1-13a HWB 1-15a, 2-15a HWB 1-16a, 2-16a HWB 1-17a, 2-17a Unit of Study Unit 6 Micro-organisms Estimated Teaching Time 50 minutes

Feasibility of Reducing Slug Damage in Cabbage: Part II

Summer Stress Syndrome in Bentgrass

Transcription:

World Class. Face to Face. Washington Winegrowers Association Graduate Student Oral Presentation February 7, 2018 ASSESSING SPRAYER TECHNOLOGIES IN WASHINGTON VINEYARDS Margaret McCoy, Graduate Research Assistant wine.wsu.edu

TEAM AND PARTNERS Michelle Moyer Gwen Hoheisel Lav Khot Funded by the Washington State Grape and Wine Research Program

WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN A SPRAYER? Ease of use Can it be customized? Longevity of the machine How well does it work? Mechanical preferences Parts availability Tank size Is it compatible with my crops? Good customer service? Machine size Compatible products? Nozzle style Deposition Suitable pattern? droplet size Is drift an issue? Air volume and direction

WHAT GOES UP, MUST COME DOWN BUT WHERE?

RESEARCH TRIAL Quantum Mist Gregoire On Target

VINEYARD COLLECTION AREAS Canopy Floor Aerial

FIELD DIAGRAM ISO TANDARDS C C C C C C: canopy collection SPRAYER F: floor drift collection D: aerial drift collection

MATERIALS AND METHODS

QUANTUM MIST DESCRIPTION Over the row, multiaxial fan Individual position adjustments Turn fan speed up and down Exchangeable nozzles 6 nozzles per fan Early Season: 50 GPA Late Season: 75 GPA *normalized

SPRAY DEPOSITION: CANOPY *Modified VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 95.57% 98.48% Floor 1.65% 0.01% Aerial 2.78% 1.51% Percentage of deposition 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Quantum Mist Canopy Deposition Early Season Late Season 29% 33% 25% 23% 22% 24% 16% 15% 6% 6% Top Right Top Middle Top Left Bottom Right Bottom Left Canopy Zones Early Season: 50 GPA Late Season: 75 GPA *normalized

SPRAY DEPOSITION: FLOOR DRIFT *Modified VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 95.57% 98.48% Floor 1.65% 0.01% Aerial 2.78% 1.51% Percentage of deposition 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Quantum Mist Floor Deposition Early Season Late Season 97% 20% 67% 13% 2% 2% 1 Row Over 2 Row Over 3 Row Over Rows from Sprayer Early Season: 50 GPA Late Season: 75 GPA *normalized

SPRAY DEPOSITION: AERIAL DRIFT *Modified VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 95.57% 98.48% Floor 1.65% 0.01% Aerial 2.78% 1.51% Percentage of deposition 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Quantum Mist Aerial Deposition Early Season Late Season 56% 46% 25% 27% 27% 18% 1 Row from Sprayer 2 Row from Sprayer 3 Row from Sprayer Rows from Sprayer Early Season: 50 GPA Late Season: 75 GPA *normalized

GREGOIRE DESCRIPTION Over the row Fan is controlled by RPM Don t decrease fan; slobber not droplets Air shear nozzles 5 nozzles per sock Low volume 50 GPA or less Early Season: 25 GPA Late Season: 50 GPA *normalized

SPRAY DEPOSITION: CANOPY *Modified VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 97.35% 97.08% Floor 0.09% 0.08% Aerial 2.56% 2.84% Percentage of deposition 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Gregoire Canopy Deposition Early Season Late Season 33% 38% 25% 23% 16% 9% 17% 16% 11% 11% Top Right Top Middle Top Left Bottom Right Bottom Left Canopy Zone Early Season: 25 GPA Late Season: 50 GPA *normalized

SPRAY DEPOSITION: FLOOR DRIFT *Modified VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 97.35% 97.08% Floor 0.09% 0.08% Aerial 2.56% 2.84% Gregoire Floor Deposition Early Season Late Season Percentage of deposition 200% 180% 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 90% 95% 4% 3% 6% 2% 1 Row Over 2 Row Over 3 Row Over Rows from Sprayer Early Season: 25 GPA Late Season: 50 GPA *normalized

SPRAY DEPOSITION: AERIAL DRIFT *Modified VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 97.35% 97.08% Floor 0.09% 0.08% Aerial 2.56% 2.84% Percentage of deposition 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Gregoire Aerial Deposition Early Season Late Season 96% 23% 24% 52% 3% 1% 1 Row from Sprayer 2 Row from Sprayer 3 Row from Sprayer Rows fromsprayer Early Season: 25 GPA Late Season: 50 GPA *normalized

ON TARGET DESCRIPTION Over the row Directed air Electrostatic Air shear electrostatic nozzles 5 nozzles tube; 2 tubes per arm Low volume 20 GPA Early Season & Late Season: 20 GPA

SPRAY DEPOSITION: CANOPY *Strict VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 91.79% 80.12% Floor 0.42% 4.05% Aerial 7.79% 15.83% OnTarget percentage of deposition within Full Row canopy zones Early Season Late Season Percentage of deposition 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 37% 33% 27% 25% 19% 29% 13% 17% Top Right Top Left Bottom Right Bottom Left Canopy Zone Early Season: & Late Season: 20 GPA

SPRAY DEPOSITION: FLOOR DRIFT *Strict VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 91.79% 80.12% Floor 0.42% 4.05% Aerial 7.79% 15.83% OnTarget Floor Drift percentages between rows away from the sprayer Early Season Late Season Percentage of deposition 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 80% 84% 18% 12% 3% 4% 1 Row Over 2 Row Over 3 Row Over Rows from Sprayer Early Season: & Late Season: 20 GPA

SPRAY DEPOSITION: AERIAL DRIFT 70% *Strict VSP Early Season Late Season Canopy 91.79% 80.12% Floor 0.42% 4.05% Aerial 7.79% 15.83% OnTarget Aerial Drift percentages above the canopy rows away from the sprayer Early Season Late Season Percentage of deposition 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 52% 49% 34% 30% 14% 21% 1 Row from Sprayer 2 Row from Sprayer 3 Row from Sprayer Rows from Sprayer Early Season: & Late Season: 20 GPA

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION All sprayers performed well with high deposition in the canopy Drift was highest in the rows closest to the sprayer Generally, more deposition in the upper zones Mechanical set-up may help distribute this concentration throughout canopy

CHECK OUT MY POSTER!