Should We Be More Aggressive in the Treatment of Acute DVT?

Similar documents
Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT Trial)

Iliofemoral DVT: Miminizing Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

Techniques for thrombus removal in acute DVT Benefits of an Endovascular Approach for Rapid Flow Restoration in DVT

The evidence for venous interventions is evolving- many patients do actually benefit. Nils Kucher University Hospital Bern Switzerland

THERE IS NO ROLE FOR SURGICAL THERAPY FOR DVT

Intervention for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolus

Pharmaco-mechanical techniques stand alone procedures? Peter Neglén, MD, PhD SP Vascular Center Limassol Cyprus

- Our patients with iliofemoral DVT - Effective thrombus removal with purely mechanical thrombectomy can lead to better outcomes

Aggressive endovascular management of ilio-femoral DVT. thrombotic syndrome. is the key in preventing post

Optimal Utilization of Thrombolytics

Venous interventions in DVT

Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis: Does it really work? The BERNUTIFUL trial

Not all Leg DVT s are the Same: Which Patients Benefit from Interventional Therapy? Case 1:

5 year quality of life data after EKOS treatment in acute DVT

Improved clinical outcomes Evidence on venous mechanical thrombectomy followed by stenting

Implications from the ACCP 2012 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Thrombosis: a case based approach

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, ON

Copy Here. The Easy One.. What is the Role of Thrombus Removal in Acute Proximal DVT after ATTRACT? Deep Venous Thrombosis Spectrum

Chronic Iliocaval Venous Occlusive Disease

Future Devices of Venous Interventions

Improved clinical outcomes Evidence on venous thrombectomy followed by stenting

Methods of Thrombus Fragmentation & Extraction. Methods of Thrombus Extraction

4/23/2009. September 15, 2008

Evidence for endovascular therapy of iliofemoral DVT: CAVENT, ATTRACT, CAVA and more to come

What is the optimal time window for treating deep venous thrombosis? Acute vs subacute vs chronic

The Evidence Base for Treating Acute DVT

Treatment of Chronic DVT with EKOS: Reproducing ACCESS PTS Data in Every Day Clinical Practice

Ileo Femoral DVT Review and Update

Meissner MH, Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:

How to best approach chronic venous occlusions?

Interventional Treatment VTE: Radiologic Approach

Aspirex for Upper and Lower Extremity DVT

The Ideal Venous Stent and Early Results from Venous Stent Trials PNEC, Seattle

REKANALISATION CHRONISCH VENÖSER VERSCHLÜSSE. Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, FESC

A Dedicated Venous Self-expanding Oblique Hybrid Nitinol Stent (Sinus-Obliquus Stent)

VERNACULAR Trial & Clinical Experience with the VENOVO Venous Stent

Surgical approach for DVT. Division of Vascular Surgery Department of Surgery Seoul National University College of Medicine

Mechanical treatment for acute DVT. Laurent Casbas, MD Toulouse, France

PEARL Registry Update Overview Venous Arterial AV Access

Venous stent experience in Arnsberg Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC

Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Iliofemoral DVT with the Aspirex Catheter: The Dijon Experience

Clinical results of venous stents. Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC

Acoustic Pulse Thrombolysis Treatment

Status of anticoagulation therapy in 2016: Is there a need for venous revascularization?

Venous Thrombosis. Magnitude of the Problem. DVT 2 Million PE 600,000. Death 60,000. Estimated Cost of VTE Care $1.5 Billion/year.

Technique de recanalisation: mon expérience avec Aspirex

Catheter-directed thrombolysis of deep vein thrombosis: literature review and practice considerations

Percutaneously Inserted AngioVac Suction Thrombectomy for the Treatment of Filter-Related. Iliocaval Thrombosis

Mark H. Meissner, MD Peter Gloviczki Professor of Venous & Lymphatic Disorders University of Washington School of Medicine

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE

Post-Thrombotic Syndrome Prevention and Management. Dr. Ashwini Bennett

4/30/2018 CLOT+ In patients with an acute proximal deep vein thrombosis, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis does not reduce t

Prevention of VTE Sequelae: Post-thrombotic Syndrome and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

PEARL REGISTRY Post Market Registry

Iliofemoral outflow obstruction. - Acute and chronic DVT - Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD. Venous Center Arnsberg

ENHANCING YOUR OPTIONS

Venous stenting in Marseille

EKOS. Interventional Vascular 3 February, Imagine where we can go.

Successful recanalisation of venous thrombotic occlusions with Aspirex mechanical thrombectomy. Michael K. W. Lichtenberg

Anticoagulation therapy following endovascular treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

On Which Criteria Do You Select Your Stent for Ilio-femoral Venous Obstruction? North American Point of View

Early clinical outcomes of a novel rheolytic directional thrombectomy technique for patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

The Conservative and Active Management of Post Thrombotic Syndrome

Patency and Clinical Outcomes of a Dedicated, Self-Expanding, Hybrid Oblique Stent Used in the Treatment of Common Iliac Vein Compression

VIRTUS: Trial Design and Primary Endpoint Results

Deep Venous Thrombosis: The Opportunity at Hand

The hallmark of percutaneous thrombus management

No financial disclosures

Complex Iliocaval Reconstruction PNEC. Seattle WA. Bill Marston MD Professor, Div of Vascular Surgery University of N.

The hallmark of percutaneous thrombus management

Emerging Tools for Lytic-Free, Single-Session Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic Disease

Introduction. Keywords Haemorrhage, mechanical thrombolysis, post-thrombotic syndrome, vascular patency, venous thrombosis

Chronic deep venous occlusions: Case planning, recanalization and stent technique

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE

Determinants of Early and Long-term Efficacy of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis

J Jpn Coll Angiol, 2009, 49:

What Really Matters to Patient is QOL: Veniti Virtus Venous Feasibility Trial

Outcomes Of Combined Rheolytic And Rotational Mechanical Thrombectomy For Total Access Circuit Thrombosis In Hemodialysis Patients

Thrombolysis versus thrombectomy in acute deep vein thrombosis

Management of Acute DVT Extending From the Tibial Veins to the Common Iliac Vein Using the AngioJet Thrombectomy System

Venous clot lysis and stenting

PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM

Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Division, St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London

BC Vascular Day. Contents. November 3, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 2 3. Peripheral Arterial Disease 4 6. Deep Venous Thrombosis 7 8

Patient population. Study objectives. Randomization and stratification. Study design, organization, and regulatory status. Standard DVT therapy

Use of EKOS Catheter in the management of Venous Mr. Manoj Niverthi, Mr. Sarang Pujari, and Ms. Nupur Dandavate, The GTF Group

VIVO-EU Results: Prospective European Study of the Zilver Vena TM Venous Stent in the Treatment of Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction

Understanding of the importance of venous

Catheter directed interventions for acute deep vein thrombosis

Patency rates and clinical results of the Veniti VICI Stent for treatment of iliac vein lesion Data from the Arnsberg Venous Registry

Do Venous Procedures Have an Impact on Quality of Life? Mark H. Meissner, MD Professor of Surgery University of Washington Seattle, WA USA

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Single Center 4 year series of 114 consecutive patients treated for massive and submassive PE. Mark Goodwin, MD

Image-Guided Approach to Treatment of Patients with Nonthrombotic

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

Catheter Interventions for pulmonary embolism:

Isolated pharmacomechanical thrombolysis using the Trellis system

SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ENDOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION FOR PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL OCCLUSIONS

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Transcription:

DISCLOSURES Consultant Penumbra, Inc. UCSF Vascular Surgery Symposium April 6, 2017 K. Pallav Kolli, MD Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology University of California, San Francisco 17 yo male, DVT 8 months ago, complete iliac v. occlusion. 3-block LLE venous claudication. Symptoms completely resolved x3.5 years 1

Patient Selection 16 yo previously healthy with acute iliocavofemoral DVT ~60% 100% ACUTE DVT HEALTHY ACUTE DVT ~40% AGGRESSIVE THERAPY SELECT CASES ~0.5% POST THROMBOTIC SYNDROME PHLEGMASIA PROGRESSIVE DVT PTS: Incidence after Symptomatic DVT Kahn S et al. Ann Intern Med 2008 Multicenter prospective study of PTS occurring over 2 years following acute symptomatic DVT in adults (n=387) 43% incidence of PTS (modified Villalta scoring) 30% mild (Villalta 5-9) 10% moderate (10-14) 3% severe (> 14 or ulcer) Proximal DVT increases likelihood of PTS 2.23 increase in MV score vs. distal, p < 0.001 Proximal DVT increases risk of recurrent ipsilateral DVT HR 2.4, p = 0.036 2

Society for Vascular Surgery Practice Guidelines CaVenT (2012) RCT of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus conventional therapy alone for acute DVT (< 21 d) above mid-thigh (n = 209) Patients followed for 2 years 54% femoral vein DVT only Catheter-Directed Therapy No pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (tpa infusion only) Lysis success: 48% complete lysis, 41% partial lysis, 10% unsuccessful Adjunctive therapy: 23% percutaneous transluminal angioplasty 15% patients stented Meissner MH et al J Vasc Surg 2012 Enden T et al J Lancet 2012 CaVenT (2012) Post Thrombotic Syndrome (Villalta) ARR of 14.4% (41.1% CDT versus 55.6% control) in CDT group, iliofemoral patency at 6 months decreased risk of PTS at 24 months: 37% versus 61% (p = 0.001) Does Being Aggressive Improve QOL? CaVenT (2013) Secondary Outcomes Risks No death, ICH, or PE 3 major complications 1 abdominal wall hematoma necessitating transfusion 1 calf compartment syndrome necessitating surgery 1 inguinal puncture site hematoma Enden T et al J Lancet 2012 Enden T et al BMJ Open 2013 3

Do People with PTS have worse QOL? CaVenT (2013) Secondary Outcomes CaVenT 5 year Follow-Up (2016) N = 176 (84% of original 209 randomized) 87 from CDT group, 89 from control group Post Thrombotic Syndrome (Villalta) ARR of 28% (43% CDT versus 71% control) (2 year f/u had ARR of 14.4%) BUT, still no difference between QOL scores Enden T et al BMJ Open 2013 Haig Y et al Lancet Haematol 2016 ATTRACT (2017) NIH-sponsored multicenter open-label, assessor-blinded two-arm RCT (n = 692) Compared pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis + standard therapy versus standard therapy ATTRACT (2017) PCDT Technique Poor Popliteal Good Popliteal PRIMARY OUTCOME = DEVELOPMENT OF PTS at 2 years Infusion-First AngioJet Trellis SECONDARY OUTCOMES = safety, QOL, cost-effectiveness, relief of early pain and swelling Additional infusion thrombolysis, adjunctive techniques for thombus removal, and venoplasty/stenting Vedantham S et al. Am Heart J 2013 Vedantham S et al. Am Heart J 2013 4

ATTRACT (2017) Initial Data Presented at SIR Outcome (24 mo) PCDT (n = 336) No-PCDT (n = 355) P Value Any PTS 46.7% 48.2% 0.56 Moderate or Severe PTS 17.9% 23.7% 0.035 Moderate or Severe PTS w/ifdvt 18.4% 28.2% Patient Selection NO! Moderate or Severe PTS w/fpdvt 17.1% 18.1% Recurrent VTE 12.5% 8.5% 0.09 Generic QOL (SF-36 PCS) 11.8 10.1 0.37 Venous QOL (VEINES) 27.7 23.5 0.08 Meissner MH et al J Vasc Surg 2012 Patient Selection Technique 5

How Much Thrombus Removal is Enough? How Much Thrombus Removal is Enough? OPEN VEIN HYPOTHESIS Comerota AJ et al. J Vasc Surg 2012 6

How Much Thrombus Removal is Enough? CaVenT CDT Group Analysis (2013) Inverse correlation between post-lysis thrombus score and venous patency at 24 months (p = 0.04) How Much Thrombus Removal is Enough? Presence of iliofemoral patency at 6 and 24 months correlated with reduced frequency of PTS (p < 0.001) No correlation between post-lysis thrombus score and PTS (p =.473) or Villalta score (p =.723) Haig Y et al. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2013 Better Tools? ATTRACT (2017) PCDT Technique Poor Popliteal Good Popliteal Patient Selection Technique YES! Infusion-First AngioJet Additional infusion thrombolysis, adjunctive techniques for thombus removal, and venoplasty/stenting Vedantham S et al. Am Heart J 2013 7

Ultrasound-Accelerated Ultrasound-Accelerated BERNUTIFUL (2015) RCT comparing USAT (n = 24) to standard CDT (n = 24) in patients with symptomatic acute iliofemoral DVT No difference in % thrombus reduction or 3- month patency or Villalta score BTG Ekos Ekosonic Catheter Engelberger RP et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Better Tools? ATTRACT (2017) PCDT Technique Improved Rheolytic Thrombectomy? Poor Popliteal Good Popliteal Infusion-First AngioJet Additional infusion thrombolysis, adjunctive techniques for thombus removal, and venoplasty/stenting Vedantham S et al. Am Heart J 2013 8

Aspiration/Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices 34 yo with active UC flare (bloody stools) 9

Better Tools? ATTRACT (2017) PCDT Technique Poor Popliteal Good Popliteal Infusion-First AngioJet Additional infusion thrombolysis, adjunctive techniques for thombus removal, and venoplasty/stenting Vedantham S et al. Am Heart J 2013 Venous Stents Venous Stents in U.S. Trials Boston Scientific WALLSTENT Late 1980s-1990s Laser Cut Nitinol Tube Self-Expanding Stents 1990s-early 2000s Cook Zilver Vena Veniti VICI Bard VENOVO 10

Patient Selection NO! THANK YOU! Technique YES! 11