Introduction. These patients benefit less from conventional chemotherapy than patients identified as MMR proficient or microsatellite stable 3-5

Similar documents
CheckMate-142 Study Design

Reference Slide Deck. Abstract 553 Abstract 554 Abstract 560

Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma With Stable Brain Metastases at Baseline: A Pooled Retrospective Analysis

CheckMate 153: Randomized Results of Continuous vs 1-Year Fixed-Duration Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Nivolumab in Patients With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient/Microsatellite Instability High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Update From CheckMate 142

Efficacy of Sonidegib in Patients With Metastatic BCC (mbcc)

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-l Alleud, Belgium; 12 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

SYNOPSIS Final Abbreviated Clinical Study Report for Study CA ABBREVIATED REPORT

The RUTHERFORD-2 trial in heterozygous FH: Results and implications

IMpower133: Primary PFS, OS, and safety in a Ph1/3 study of 1L atezolizumab + carboplatin + etoposide in extensive-stage SCLC

Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Sarilumab and Intravenous Tocilizumab in Patients With RA

YERVOY (ipilimumab) injection, for intravenous use Initial U.S. Approval: 2011

A review of the patterns of docetaxel use for hormone-resistant prostate cancer at the Princess Margaret Hospital

Clinical Study Report Synopsis Drug Substance Naloxegol Study Code D3820C00018 Edition Number 1 Date 01 February 2013 EudraCT Number

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): AVE0005 (aflibercept)

Start ORKAMBI today. INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. Sydney Age 4

Abstract. Background. Aim. Patients and Methods. Patients. Study Design

The incidence of melanoma, the most serious

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

For Adults with Metastatic Melanoma

Y. Yazici 1, D. Moniz Reed 2, C. Klem 2, L. Rosenblatt 2, G. Wu 2, J.M. Kremer 3

Original Article. Breast Care 2016;11: DOI: /

Presented at the 75 th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Orlando, FL, March 3-7, 2017 METHODS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE

Clinical Evidence for Second- and Third-Line Treatment Options in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions Management Guide

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Prognostic significance of pretreatment serum levels of albumin, LDH and total bilirubin in patients with nonmetastatic

MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 7: , 2017

Patient Monitoring Checklist

Supplementary Online Content

Immunotherapy for dmmr metastatic colorectal cancer. Prof.dr. Kees Punt Dept. Medical Oncology AUMC

For Adults With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Management of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

MEDALIST Trial Background and Rationale

Presentation Number: LBA18_PR. Lecture Time: 09:15-09:27. Speakers: Heinz-Josef J. Lenz (Los Angeles, US) Background

Symptom Management and Supportive Care

J Clin Oncol by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Impact of Pharmacist Intervention on Diabetes Patients in an Ambulatory Setting

R Martino 1, P Romero 1, M Subirá 1, M Bellido 1, A Altés 1, A Sureda 1, S Brunet 1, I Badell 2, J Cubells 2 and J Sierra 1

THE FUTURE OF IMMUNOTHERAPY IN COLORECTAL CANCER. Prof. Dr. Hans Prenen, MD, PhD Oncology Department University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium

1 Indications and Usage

IMPORTANT Reminders for Patients. IMPORTANT Information for Doctors/Nurses

Results. Table 1: Demographic and Baseline Characteristics, Open-Label Safety Population Prior Double-Blind OC/APAP ER (n=77)

See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and Medication Guide. Revised: 10/2017

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi s sarcoma

Gemmis Injection 38 mg/ml

In the treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD), national

Emerging Options for Thromboprophylaxis After Orthopedic Surgery: A Review of Clinical Data

Metformin and breast cancer stage at diagnosis: a population-based study

Age related differences in prognosis and prognostic factors among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Managing treatment-related adverse events associated with egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Managing treatment-related adverse events associated with egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog, in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

Adverse Events Grading Card

Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial of a Recombinant Human Endostatin Adenovirus in Patients with Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma

A PHASE IIA STUDY OF TISOTUMAB VEDOTIN (HUMAX -TF-ADC) IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED, RECURRENT AND/OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER

TR Spitzer 1, CJ Friedman 2, W Bushnell 2, SR Frankel 3, J Raschko 4. Summary:

Community. Profile Big Horn County. Public Health and Safety Division

Community. Profile Powell County. Public Health and Safety Division

key words: bortezomib, multiple myeloma, retrospective analysis, treatment outcomes, subcutaneous, intravenous

Fertility in Norwegian testicular cancer patients

Case Report INTRODUCTION CASE REPORT. pissn eissn X

INMUNOTERAPIA EN CANCER COLORRECTAL METASTASICO. CCRm MSI-H NUEVO ESTANDAR EN PRIMERA LINEA Y/O PRETRATADOS?

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths in

Effect of vitamin D on the recurrence rate of rheumatoid arthritis

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastasis in Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

T max (hr) 1.5 ± ± ± 0.6 AUC (0-10) (ng hr/ml)

Patients with cancer are at an increased

PNEUMOVAX 23 is recommended by the CDC for all your appropriate adult patients at increased risk for pneumococcal disease 1,2 :

Supplementary Online Content

Community. Profile Yellowstone County. Public Health and Safety Division

Summary. Effect evaluation of the Rehabilitation of Drug-Addicted Offenders Act (SOV)

The potential future of targeted radionuclide therapy: implications for occupational exposure? P. Covens

Community. Profile Lewis & Clark County. Public Health and Safety Division

Community. Profile Missoula County. Public Health and Safety Division

Community. Profile Anaconda- Deer Lodge County. Public Health and Safety Division

Input from external experts and manufacturer on the 2 nd draft project plan Stool DNA testing for early detection of colorectal cancer

Chilblains (pernio, perniosis) are cold-induced, painful or itching

Capecitabine in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. doi: /ajg.2012.

Target: 10 mg/day within several days Schizophrenia in adolescents (2.1)

Body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and metabolic syndrome as predictors of middle-aged men's health

CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PEMBROLIZUMAB IN MSI-H CANCERS

See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION. Revised: 09/2017 FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION: CONTENTS*

Patient Survival After Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Original Article. T Akter 1, N Islam 2, MA Hoque 3, S Khanam 4, HA khan 5, BK Saha 6. Abstract:

Diabetes affects 29 million Americans, imposing a substantial

Asian Journal of Andrology (2017) 19,

Clinical Study. Oncology 2006;71:32 39 DOI: /

Breast-Conserving Surgery Under Local Anesthesia in Elderly Patients with Severe Cardiorespiratory Comorbidities: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study

See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and FDAapproved

Tumor Vascularity Does Not Predict Response to Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

Comparative Safety of Filgrastim versus Sargramostim in Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy

Treatment of leukemia with partially matched related bone marrow transplantation

Summary of Clinical Data for IFU EN (Zenith Dissection Endovascular System) 1

One of the most important biological mechanisms of

III Sessione I risultati clinici

Risks for All-Cause Mortality: Stratified by Age, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Albuminuria

Academia Pharma Intersect: Lung Cancer. A. JOHN IAFRATE c

Transcription:

Nivolumb + Ipilimumb Combintion in Ptients With DNA Mismtch Repir-Deficient/Microstellite Instbility-High Metsttic Colorectl Cncer: First Report of the Full Cohort From CheckMte-142 Abstrct 553 André T, Lonrdi S, Wong M, Lenz H-J, Gelsomino F, Agliett M, Morse M, Vn Cutsem E, McDermott R, Hill AG, Swyer MB, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Svrcek M, Moss RA, Ledeine J-M, Co ZA, Kmble S, Kopetz S, Overmn MJ

Introduction Approximtely 4% of ptients with mcrc hve deficiency in the DNA mismtch repir system (dmmr) tht leds to high microstellite instbility (MSI-H) 1,2 These ptients benefit less from conventionl chemotherpy thn ptients identified s MMR proficient or microstellite stble 3-5 Nivolumb demonstrted durble responses, sustined disese control, nd encourging survivl in ptients with dmmr/msi-h mcrc in the monotherpy cohort of CheckMte-142 6 Nivolumb nd ipilimumb ct synergisticlly to promote T-cell ntitumor ctivity; therefore, combintion therpy could further improve results 7-9 Presented here re nlyses from the nivolumb + ipilimumb combintion therpy cohort of CheckMte-142, which is the lrgest single-study report of combintion immune checkpoint inhibitors in ptients with dmmr/msi-h mcrc mcrc, metsttic colorectl cncer 1. Le DT, et l. Science 217;357(6349(:49-413. 2. Koopmn M, et l. Br J Cncer 29;1(2):266-273. 3. Venderbosch S, et l. Clin Cncer Res 214;2(2:5322-533. 4. Tougeron D, et l. Ann Oncol 217;28(suppl 5). Abstrct 533P. 5. Lenz H, et l. J Clin Oncol 217;35(suppl): Abstrct 3511. 6. Overmn MJ, et l. Lncet Oncol 217;18(9):1182-1191. 7. Diz LA, et l. Ann Oncol. 217;28(suppl 5). Abstrct 386P. 8. Antoni SJ, et l. Lncet Oncol 216;17(7):883-895. 9. Lrkin J, et l. N Engl J Med 215;373(1):23-34. Presented André T, et l. by: J Prof Clin Oncol. Thierry 218;36(suppl André 4S): Abstrct 553. 2

Histologiclly confirmed metsttic or recurrent CRC dmmr/msi-h per locl lbortory 1 prior line of therpy CheckMte-142 Study Design Combintion cohort Monotherpy cohort Phse II Nonrndomized Study Nivolumb 3 mg/kg + ipilimumb 1 mg/kg Q3W (4 doses nd then nivolumb 3 mg/kg Q2W) Nivolumb 3 mg/kg Q2W Primry endpoint: ORR per investigtor ssessment (RECIST v1.1) Other key endpoints: ORR per BICR, DCR, b DOR, PFS, OS, nd sfety Medin follow-up in the combintion therpy cohort (N = 119) ws 13.4 months (rnge, 9-25) c Results of the monotherpy cohort (N = 74) with similr medin follow-up of 13.4 months (rnge, 1-32) re lso presented 1,c Enrollment ws stggered with dditionl ptients being enrolled if 7 of the first 19 centrlly confirmed MSI-H ptients hd confirmed response (CR or PR). CheckMte-142 monotherpy nd combintion therpy cohorts were not rndomized or designed for forml comprison. b Ptients with CR, PR, or SD for 12 weeks. c Defined here s the time from first dose to dt cutoff. BICR, blinded independed centrl review; CR, complete response; DCR, disese control rte; DOR, durtion of response; ORR, overll response rte; OS, overll survivl; PFS, progression-free survivl 1. Overmn MJ, et l. Lncet Oncol. 217;18(9):1182-1191. André T, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218;36(suppl 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 3

Bseline Chrcteristics Nivolumb + Ipilimumb N = 119 Medin ge (rnge), yers 58. (21-88) Mle, n (%) 7 (59) ECOG performnce sttus, n (%) 54 (45) 1 65 (55) Disese stge t dignosis, n (%) I-III IV Tumor PD-L1 expression t bseline, n (%) 1% <1% Unknown Muttion sttus, n (%) BRAF/KRAS wildtype BRAF muttion KRAS muttion Unknown Clinicl history of Lynch syndrome, n (%) b Yes No Unknown 66 (55) 53 (45) 26 (22) 65 (55) 28 (24) 31 (26) 29 (24) 44 (37) 15 (13) 35 (29) 31 (26) 53 (45) All ptients hd stge IV disese t study entry. b Bsed on the clinicl records of the ptients t sites in countries where this reporting ws permitted (excluded Itly). Presented André T, et l. by: J Prof Clin Oncol. Thierry 218;36(suppl André 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 4

Prior lines of therpy, n (%) 1 2 3 Prior Therpies Nivolumb + Ipilimumb N = 119 27 (23) 43 (36) 48 (4) Prior therpies received, n (%) Fluoropyrimidine b Oxlipltin Irinotecn VEGF inhibitors c EGFR inhibitors d Regorfenib Trifluridine/tipircil Other chemotherpy Other experimentl drugs 118 (99) 111 (93) 87 (73) 68 (57) 35 (29) 11 (9) 2 (2) 8 (7) 3 (3) 76% of ptients received 2 prior lines of therpy 69% received 3 prior chemotherpies including fluoropyrimidine, oxlipltin, nd irinotecn EGFR, epiderml growth fctor receptor; VEGF, vsculr endothelil growth fctor One ptient hd received no prior lines of therpy. b Included fluorourcil nd cpecitbine. c Included bevcizumb, flibercept, nd rmucirumb. d Included cetuximb nd pnitumumb. Presented André T, et l. by: J Prof Clin Oncol. Thierry 218;36(suppl André 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 5

Exposure nd Disposition Nivolumb + Ipilimumb N = 119 Medin number of doses, (rnge) Nivolumb Ipilimumb 24 (1 55) 4 (1 4) Continuing tretment, n (%) 75 (63) Discontinued tretment, n (%) 44 (37) Resons for tretment discontinution, n (%) Disese progression AE relted to study drug AE unrelted to study drug Other 23 (19) 16 (13) 2 (2) 3 (3) Other resons included loss to follow-up, deth, nd ptient did not present for restging (n = 1 for ech). AE, dverse event Presented André T, et l. by: J Prof Clin Oncol. Thierry 218;36(suppl André 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 6

Investigtor-Assessed Response nd Disese Control Nivolumb + Ipilimumb N = 119 1 3.4 Nivolumb N = 74 1,c Ptients, % 8 6 4 2 51.3 31 12 ORR (95% CI): 55% (45.2, 63.8) 3 5 DCR b ws 8% (95% CI: 71.5, 86.6) with combintion therpy 31 38 26 ORR (95% CI): 31% (2.8, 42.9) CR PR SD PD Unknown Medin follow-up ws 13.4 months (rnge, 9-25). b Disese control ws defined s ptients with CR, PR, or SD for 12 weeks. Presented André T, et l. by: J Prof Clin Oncol. Thierry 218;36(suppl André 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 7

Investigtor-Assessed Response nd Disese Control Nivolumb + Ipilimumb N = 119 1 3.4 Nivolumb N = 74 1,c Ptients, % 8 6 4 2 51.3 31 12 ORR (95% CI): 55% (45.2, 63.8) 3 5 31 38 26 ORR (95% CI): 31% (2.8, 42.9) CR PR SD PD Unknown DCR b ws 8% (95% CI: 71.5, 86.6) with combintion therpy nd 69% (57.1, 79.2) with monotherpy 1,d Combintion therpy provided numericlly higher ORR, including CRs, nd DCR reltive to monotherpy during similr follow-up period d Medin follow-up ws 13.4 months (rnge, 9-25). b Disese control ws defined s ptients with CR, PR, or SD for 12 weeks. c Medin follow-up ws 13.4 months (rnge, 1 32). d CheckMte-142 monotherpy nd combintion therpy cohorts were not rndomized or designed for forml comprison. 1. Overmn MJ et l. Lncet Oncol. 217;18(9):1182-1191. Presented André T, et l. by: J Prof Clin Oncol. Thierry 218;36(suppl André 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 8

Best Reduction in Trget Lesions 1 Nivolumb + Ipilimumb Best Reduction From Bseline in Trget Lesion Size, % 75 5 25-25 -5-75 -1 Confirmed response per investigtor ssessment * * * * * 2-3 78% of ptients hd reduction in tumor burden from bseline with combintion therpy Evluble ptients per investigtor ssessment. André T, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218;36(suppl 4S): Abstrct 553. 9

Chrcteriztion of Response Nivolumb + Ipilimumb Medin time to response ws 2.8 months (rnge, 1-14) Responses were durble: Responders (n = 65) On tretment Off tretment First response Ongoing response Censored Deth Medin DOR ws not reched 94% of responders hd ongoing responses t dt cutoff 83% of responders hd responses lsting 6 months 12 24 36 48 6 72 84 96 18 Response per investigtor ssessment. Weeks André T, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218;36(suppl 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 1

Response nd Disese Control in Ptient Subsets Nivolumb + Ipilimumb (N = 119) n ORR DCR b Tumor PD-L1 expression, n (%) 1% 26 14 (54) 2 (77) <1% 65 34 (52) 51 (78) BRAF/KRAS muttion sttus, n (%) Wildtype 31 17 (55) 24 (77) BRAF mutnt 29 16 (55) 23 (79) KRAS mutnt 44 25 (57) 37 (84) Clinicl history of Lynch syndrome, n (%) c Yes 35 25 (71) 3 (86) No 31 15 (48) 25 (81) Responses were observed irrespective of tumor PD-L1 expression, BRAF or KRAS muttionl sttus, or clinicl history of Lynch syndrome Per investigtor ssessment. b Ptients with CR, PR, or SD for 12 weeks. c Bsed on the clinicl records of the ptients t sites in countries where this reporting ws permitted (excluded Itly). Presented André T, et l. by: J Prof Clin Oncol. Thierry 218;36(suppl André 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 11

No. t Risk Progression-Free Survivl, % c 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Progression-Free nd Overll Survivl Nivolumb + ipilimumb Nivolumb Nivolumb + ipilimumb,b 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Months Nivolumb 1,e,f 9-month rte (95% CI), % 76 (67., 82.7) 54 (41.5, 64.5) 12-month rte (95% CI), % 71 (61.4, 78.7) 5 (38.1, 61.4) 27 3 Nivolumb + ipilimumb 119 95 86 78 39 12 11 1 3 Nivolumb 74 48 41 32 17 12 12 11 6 3 With similr follow-up, combintion therpy provided improved PFS nd OS reltive to monotherpy,e,f Overll Survivl, % 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Nivolumb + ipilimumb Nivolumb Nivolumb + ipilimumb,d 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Months Nivolumb 1,e,f 9-month rte (95% CI), % 87 (8., 92.2) 78 (66.2, 85.7) 12-month rte (95% CI), % 85 (77., 9.2) 73 (61.5, 82.1) 27 3 33 119 113 17 14 78 33 19 17 11 74 64 59 55 37 21 19 17 11 6 1 Medin follow-up ws 13.4 months (rnge, 9-25). b Medin PFS ws not reched (95% CI, not estimble). c PFS per investigtor ssessment. d Medin OS ws not reched (95% CI, 18., not estimble). e Medin follow-up ws 13.4 months (rnge, 1-32). f CheckMte-142 monotherpy nd combintion therpy cohorts were not rndomized or designed for forml comprison. 1. Overmn MJ, et l. Lncet Oncol. 217;18(9):1182-1191. André T, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218;36(suppl 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 12

4 Ptient-Reported Outcomes EORTC QLQ-C3 globl helth sttus/qol Nivolumb + Ipilimumb 3 EQ-5D VAS Lest Squres Men Chnge From Bseline (95% CI) 3 2 1-1 -2-3 Better Worse Weeks * * P<.5; P<.1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 Ptient no. 17 98 84 78 75 67 68 71 57 45 31 16 1 11 1 1 Sttisticlly significnt nd cliniclly meningful improvements were chieved in key ptientreported outcomes, with improvements mintined for extended periods while on tretment 2 1-1 -2-3 Better Worse Weeks * P<.5; P<.1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 14 91 78 69 69 62 62 65 52 4 25 14 EORTC, Europen Orgnistion for Reserch nd Tretment of Cncer; QoL, qulity of life; VAS, visul nlogue scle Chnges in men scores over time were nlyzed using liner mixed models djusted for bseline score. Chnges from bseline of 1 points (EORTC QLQ-C3) nd 7 points (EQ-5D VAS) were regrded s cliniclly meningful. 1,2 1. Osob D, et l. J Clin Oncol 1998;16(1):139-144. 2. Pickrd AS, et l. Helth Qul Life Outcomes 27;5:7. André T, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218;36(suppl 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 13

Sfety Summry Ptients, n (%) Nivolumb + Ipilimumb N = 119 Any Grde Grde 3-4 Any TRAE 87 (73) 38 (32) Any serious TRAE 27 (23) 24 (2) Any TRAE leding to discontinution 15 (13) 12 (1) TRAEs reported in >1% of ptients Dirrhe 26 (22) 2 (2) Ftigue 21 (18) 2 (2) Pruritus 2 (17) 2 (2) Pyrexi 18 (15) Incresed AST 17 (14) 9 (8) Hypothyroidism 16 (13) 1 (1) Nuse 15 (13) 1 (1) Incresed ALT 14 (12) 8 (7) Rsh 13 (11) 2 (2) Hyperthyroidism 13 (11) No new sfety signls or tretmentrelted deths were reported Ptients who discontinued tretment due to study drug-relted AE (n = 16) hd n ORR (63%) consistent with the overll popultion For combintion therpy reltive to monotherpy: 1,b,c,d Any-grde TRAEs (73%; 7%) were comprble Grde 3-4 TRAEs (32%; 2%) were cceptble TRAEs leding to discontinution (13%; 7%) were modest ALT, lnine minotrnsferse; AST, sprtte minotrnsferse; TRAE, tretment-relted dverse event. Autoimmune heptitis nd cute kidney injury were the only TRAEs tht led to discontinution in >1 ptient (2% ech). b Combintion: medin follow-up, 13.4 months (rnge, 9-25). c Monotherpy: medin follow-up, 13.4 months (rnge, 1-32). d CheckMte-142 monotherpy nd combintion therpy cohorts were not rndomized or designed for forml comprison. 1. Overmn MJ et l. Lncet Oncol. 217;18(9):1182-1191. André T, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218;36(suppl 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 14

Conclusions Nivolumb + ipilimumb provided durble clinicl benefit in previously treted ptients with dmmr/msi-h mcrc, of whom 76% hd received 2 prior lines of therpy High ORR (55%) nd durble responses (medin DOR not reched) High rte of disese control (8%) for 12 weeks Encourging survivl (medin PFS nd OS not reched; 85% of ptients live t 1 yer) Sfety ws mngeble with low (13%) rte of discontinution due to TRAEs Meningful improvements were observed in key ptient-reported outcomes Indirect comprisons in this nonrndomized phse II study (CheckMte-142) suggest tht nivolumb + ipilimumb provides numericlly higher ORR, PFS, nd OS rtes t 1 yer reltive to nivolumb monotherpy with fvorble benefit-risk profile Nivolumb + ipilimumb represents promising new tretment option for ptients with previously treted dmmr/msi-h mcrc André T, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218;36(suppl 4S): Abstrct 553. Overmn MJ, et l. J Clin Oncol. 218 Jn 2. [Epub hed of print]. 15