Regional STEMI Transfer Systems: the Mayo and NC RACE Experiences

Similar documents
Transfer in D2B. Scott D Friedman, MD FACC Medical Director, Cardiology Services Shore Health System of Maryland. The Problem

REFERRAL HOSPITAL. The Importance of Door In Door Out Time DIDO

Controversies on Primary angioplasty in STEMI

Recommendations for criteria for STEMI systems of care: A focus on pharmacoinvasive strategies

Pharmaco-Invasive Approach for STEMI

The Role of DHMC as an ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Center in a Regional STEMI Care Network:

Patient and System Time Delay

The Window for Fibrinolysis. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in China: Where are we?

Mission: Lifeline Addressing the System of STEMI Care

Eagles 2007 Focused Quality in EMS The Five Required Actions

Critics of Thrombolytics: Is Pre-Hospital Clot-busting Actually a Bad Thing? David Persse, MD Houston Fire Department EMS

PPCI in STEMI. ESC at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Saudi Heart Association February 21th, 2011

NEBRASKA STEMI CONFERENCE 2015 Dr. Doug Kosmicki. 2013, American Heart Association

Sanford Chest Pain Network: Improving Rural STEMI Outcomes

Decision for fibrinolysis or primary PCI in the prehospital phase

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Management of STEMI in era of Reperfusion. Eagles Peter Moyer, MD, MPH Medical Director Boston EMS, Fire and Police

Level One STEMI Connecting the Dots changing Points of Care into Systems of Care

William D. Salerno, M.D. Director, Coronary Care Unit Hackensack University Medical Center Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, UMDNJ

Prof. Adel El Etriby Ain Shams Faculty of Medicine

Chapter 3 for 12 Lead Training -Precourse-

Thrombolysis in Cardiology to whom? Professor Steen D. Kristensen, MD, DMSc, FESC Department of Cardiology

Identification and pre-notification using 12-Lead. Why this so important to our STEMI System

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

Optimizing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Mark C. Bieniarz, MD Andrew Harrell, MD Peter Berger, MD

Reperfusion Strategies for the STEMI Patient - PCI versus Thrombolysis

Rural Minnesota STEMI Systems of Care

Daily practice of ACS management in the Gulf: Data from Gulf COAST

ACTION Registry GWTG Research and Publications Update

Patient Transfer. Mark de Belder The James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough

Improving STEMI outcomes in Denmark. Michael Rahbek Schmidt, MD, PhD. Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients: Does It Work in Asian Patients?

ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs)

The Need for Rescue PCI after Failed Fibrinolysis: Who, When and Why.

Hot Topics in Cardiac Arrest. Should the patient go To the Cath Lab?

SHOULD A REGIONAL STEMI CENTRE ONLY OFFER PRIMARY PCI?

Optimal System Specification by Point of Care Operations Manual

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

Acute Coronary Syndrome: Interventional Strategy

STEMI Network. Joseph L. Fredi, M.D., FACC. The median D2B time for patients presenting to the Vanderbilt ED was 55 minutes.

12/18/2009 Resting and Maxi Resting and Max mal Coronary Blood Flow 2

Cardiogenic Shock and Initiatives to Reduce Mortality

STREAM - ONE YEAR MORTALITY STRATEGIC REPERFUSION EARLY AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. STREAM 1Y AHA 2013 P Sinnaeve

Literature Review and Recommendations Prehospital Fibrinolytics Administration for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Systems of Care to Improve Timeliness of Reperfusion Therapy for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction During Off Hours

Acute Coronary Syndrome

National Efforts to Improve Door-to-Balloon Time

Earlier reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation Myocardial infarction by use of helicopter

Washington s Emergency Cardiac and Stroke System. Kathleen Jobe, MD FACEP Chair, Emergency Cardiac and Stroke Technical Advisory Committee

New Insights on Reperfusion Choices Implications of STREAM. Paul W Armstrong MD

Presenters: Disclaimer. Definitions. Deanna Jones, RN, CCRN. Annmarie Keck, RN, CEN

Prise en charge du SCA ST + en urgence. 9803mo01, 1

TAB 7: SUB TAB: AMI/CHEST PAIN Specifications & Paper Tools

STEMI Care 2014 at the Crossroads: Taking the right road

DISCUSSION QUESTION - 1

Update Guidelines in STEMI Management: Focus on Logistic and System Approach to Reperfusion Therapy

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

ACC Rockies New Role For An Old Friend: Contemporary Insights From The ECG

PHARMACO-INVASIVE STRATEGY COMPARED WITH PPCI: DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOMES OF THE STREAM TRIAL

Should All Patients Be Treated with Ace-inh /ARB after STEMI with Preserved LV Function?

Improving the Outcomes of

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is the consequence of

The Burden & Management of Ischaemic Heart Disease in Kenya

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Disclosure Information

PCI Strategies After Fibrinolytic Therapy

Utilization and Impact of Pre-Hospital Electrocardiograms for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Dashboard and Outcomes Report with Case Studies

M/39 CC D. => peak CKMB (12 hr later) ng/ml T.chol/TG/HDL/LDL 180/150/48/102 mg/dl #

Marcin Dada, MD December 03, 2013

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest In North Carolina. James G. Jollis, MD, FACC Co-Medical Director Regional Approach to Cardiovascular Emergencies

County of Santa Clara Emergency Medical Services System

Cardiovascular Health Nova Scotia Update to Antiplatelet Sections of the Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes, 2008.

Reperfusion Strategy in Europe: Temporal Trends in Performance Measures for Reperfusion Therapy in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

IN THIS ISSUE. Executive Communication: Southeastern RACE Region. Regional EMS Spotlight: Brunswick EMS

National Collaborative for Bio-Preparedness

Advancing the One Acute Care Network and Our Strategic Aims Regional Cardiac Services. December 2009

Update on Care of ST-Elevation MI Patient: The EMMC Experience. Peter VerLee MD Northeast Cardiology Cath Lab Director EMMC

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL. 4, NO. 6, PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. DOI: /j.jcin

Regional Systems of Care to Optimize Timeliness of Reperfusion Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction The Mayo Clinic STEMI Protocol

KCS Congress: Impact through collaboration

A community hospital s effort to expedite treatment for patients with chest pain

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

County of Santa Clara Emergency Medical Services System

The role of pre hospital thrombolysis. Aaron Frimerman Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Hadera Israel

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

EMS Recognition Webinar August 24, 2017

Mission: Lifeline EMS Recognition : FMC to Device < 90 Minutes Worksheet

Door to Balloon : The Big Deal. Shaiful Azmi Yahaya,, M.D. Consultant Cardiologist Institut Jantung Negara

Cardiac Emergencies Workshop

QUality Enhancement for Speedy Thrombolysis in Stroke

Regionalization of Post-Cardiac Arrest Care

Transcription:

Regional STEMI Transfer Systems: the Mayo and NC RACE Experiences Dr. Henry H. Ting, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Dr. James G. Jollis,, Duke University Medical Center

Mayo Clinic STEMI System for Transferred Patients FAST TRACK Henry H. Ting, MD MBA Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota Jan. 28, 2010

No financial disclosures No conflicts of interest No off-label use Disclosures

D2B Sustain The Gain Nestler DM. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:508-513.

PH ECG and Door-to-Balloon 30 min 64 min Ting HH. Presented at AHA November 2009

Patients Transferred for Primary PCI 60 Patients (%) 40 26.4 36.3 20 0 1.3 8.6 <1 <90 min 17.6 8.2 1 to <2 2 to <3 3 to <4 4 to <5 5 to <6 6 to <7 7 to <12 4.3 Total door-to to-balloon time (hours) 2.2 3.7 Chakrabarti A, J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2442-2443.

Reperfusion Strategies for Transferred STEMI Patients 1. Interhospital transfer for primary PCI 2. Pharmaco-invasive approach with lytics and early PCI 3. Lytic facilitated PCI 4. Prehospital triage for primary PCI

Reperfusion Strategies for Transferred STEMI Patients 1. Interhospital transfer for primary PCI 2. Pharmaco-invasive approach with lytics and early PCI 3. Lytic facilitated PCI 4. Prehospital triage for primary PCI

Minnesota Duluth St. Cloud Minneapolis/ St. Paul Wisconsin Rochester 0 100 200 Iowa Ting HH, et al. Circulation 2007;116:729-736

Regional STEMI Patients Treated with Primary PCI or Fibrinolytic Therapy 1.00 Cumulative probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 25 min 110 min Regional Hospital Primary PCI Regional Hospital Fibrinolysis 0 60 120 180 240 Door-to-balloon/door-to-needle time (minutes) Ting HH, et al. Circulation 2007;116:729-736

Mortality and Door-to-Needle / Door-to-Balloon 20 In-hospital Mortality (%) 16 12 8 4 0 P=0.01 1.1 3.5 5.6 6.6 11.5 13.5 <30 30-60 60-90 90-120 120-180 >180 Door-to-balloon / Door-to-needle time (minutes)

Door-in Door-out (DIDO) at 1 st Hospital and 1 st Door-to-balloon Time Median 1st Door-to-balloon (min) 250 200 150 100 50 0 143 DIDO >30 min P < 0.0001 87 DIDO <=30 min Ting HH, et al. AHA November 2009

Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy Definition: Broad use of rescue PCI after failed fibrinolysis, as well as an early PCI within 3-243 hours of successful fibrinolysis

30-day 1 1 Endpoint and Components Endpoint Standard N=498 (%) Pharmaco-Invasive N=512 (%) P value 1 end point 16.6 10.6 0.0013 Death 3.6 3.7 0.94 Re-infarction 6.0 3.3 0.044 Recurrent ischemia 2.2 0.2 0.019 Death/MI/ischemia 11.7 6.5 0.004 New/worsening CHF 5.2 2.9 0.069 Cardiogenic shock 2.6 4.5 0.11 Cantor WJ. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2705

30-day 1 1 Endpoint and Components Endpoint Standard N=498 (%) Pharmaco-Invasive N=512 (%) P value 1 end point 16.6 10.6 0.0013 Median time from lytics to PCI was 3.9 hours Death 3.6 3.7 0.94 Re-infarction 6.0 3.3 0.044 Recurrent ischemia 2.2 0.2 0.019 Death/MI/ischemia 11.7 6.5 0.004 New/worsening CHF 5.2 2.9 0.069 Cardiogenic shock 2.6 4.5 0.11 Cantor WJ. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2705

Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy: NORDISTEMI Bohmer E. JACC 2010; 55:102-110

Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy: NORDISTEMI Median time from lytics to PCI was 2.7 hours Bohmer E. JACC 2010; 55:102-110

ASSENT-4 Trial Primary vs. Full-dose TNK Fibrinolytic-Facilitated PCI 8 6 % 4 2 0 P =0.01 6 3 In-hospital Death DSMB terminated study after 1667 / 4000 enrolled because of higher in-hospital mortality observed for facilitated PCI Primary PCI P <0.0001 P =0.0037 1.8 0 0 Total Stroke 1 Hemorrhagic Stroke Facilitated PCI Van de Verf, Lancet 2006;367:569-578

ASSENT-4 Trial Primary vs. Full-dose TNK Fibrinolytic-Facilitated PCI 8 6 Median time from lytics to PCI was 1.9 hours P =0.01 6 DSMB terminated study after 1667 / 4000 enrolled because of higher in-hospital mortality observed for facilitated PCI Primary PCI Facilitated PCI % 4 2 0 3 In-hospital Death P <0.0001 P =0.0037 1.8 1 0 0 Total Stroke Hemorrhagic Stroke Van de Verf, Lancet 2006;367:569-578

Prehospital Triage Model

Proximal LAD

Prehospital Triage Model 1. Paramedics acquire and interpret PH ECG 2. If Definite STEMI,, then 1-call 1 activation of cath lab and helicopter auto-launch to intercept patient at regional hospital (or intercept enroute) 3. Bypass ED evaluation at regional hospital & PCI hospital 4. Patient transported directly to cath lab 5. Explicit diversion criteria to deviate from #2-4

Description Time Time Interval (minutes) Symptom Onset 05:30 0 9-1-1 Call 06:05 35 EMS On-Scene 06:09 4 PH ECG Acquired 06:16 7 STEMI Protocol Activation 06:17 1 Transport to Local Community Hospital 06:22 5 Arrival at Door 1 06:26 4 Departure from Door 1 06:37 11 Arrival at Door2 07:10 33 First PCI Device 07:27 17 Time Intervals Duration (minutes) *Door 1 In-to-Door 1 Out 11 *Door 2-to-First PCI Device 17 *Door 1-to-First PCI Device 61 *First EMS Contact-to-First PCI Device 82 *Symptom Onset-to-First PCI Device 117 Pitta SR. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:93-97

North Carolina's Statewide STEMI System James G. Jollis, MD, FACC Duke University

RACE Reperfusion in AMI in Carolina Emergency Departments

How patients present Call 911 EMS (~50%) Walk-in (~50%) Hospital transfer - Walk in or EMS to 1 st hospital (~60% of PCI hospital)

How patients present EMS Walk-in Hosp. transfer Current 90 90 180 Potential <60 <90 <120

21 primary PCI labs 500 EMS systems 5,240 paramedics 18,000 EMTs 121 emergency departments

Integrated, Integrated, Systematic Systematic AMI AMI Care Care

RACE Process 1) Develop leadership, funding, data structure 2) Establish REGIONAL PCI CENTERS (primary, lytic ineligible, rescue) 4) Improve system Measurement & Feedback 3b) EMS by EMS establishment of STEMI plan (review, consensus, training) 3a) HOSPITAL by hospital establishment of STEMI plan (review, consensus, training)

Establish a plan

RACE Interventions Regional coordinators

RACE Interventions Available at www.race-er.org OPERATIONS MANUAL Optimal system specifications by point of care EMS ED Transfer Receiving hospital Cath. Lab Other system issues payers, regulations

RACE Interventions Emergency Department Coordination and training of entire staff Registration (nurse first) Designated area for immediate Standing STEMI protocol agreed upon by entire emergency and cardiology staff Emergency physician leads team

RACE Interventions PCI Hospitals Single number cath lab activation Accept all STEMI patients regardless of bed availability Ongoing QI and data feedback NRMI database RACE Regional Coordinator Responsible for improving process in every hospital - EMS system in the region

EMS RACE Interventions 1) In the field ECG for all chest pain patients 2) 15 minute scene time 3) Hospital pre-notification 4) Standing STEMI plan / destination protocols

JAMA Nov. 2007

RACE results PCI hospitals: Door to device median times in minutes 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 P<0.001* 108 90 P<0.001 Pre 85 Post 74 149 P=0.01 106 All patients Direct presenters Transfer for PCI hospitals

RACE results Non-PCI hospitals: Reperfusion times median times in minutes 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 P<0.001* 120 71 Door-in door-out, all hospitals P<0.001 97 45 Door-in door-out, transfer hosps P=0.002 35 Pre Post 29 Fibrinolysis, doorto-needle * Remained significant in analysis accounting for clustering

RACE Centers and Regions 65 hospitals (10 PCI, 55 non PCI) Winston-Salem Durham-Chapel Hill- Greensboro Asheville 10 PCI centers 16 Transfer for PCI 28 Lytics 11 Mixed Charlotte East Carolina Each non-pci center was assessed for reperfusion designation based on resources, transfer ability, and transfer time to PCI center