Free-Tox. No escape THE POLYVALENT MYCOTOXIN BINDER

Similar documents
Binders-premixture for all species of animals

Mycocheck Survey 2014

Feed Products. Additive solutions

Mycotoxin Detection & Solutions

ProSid TM. Making a difference in fighting mould problems. Feed additives that give key benefits

Mycotoxins in high moisture grain silages and ensiled grain by-products

Fusarium-toxins. Frans Verstraete European Commission DG Health and Consumer Protection

Mycotoxin Detection and Solutions

Mycotoxins, MRL s & food chain contaminations

Mycotoxins and Poultry Health Natacha S. Hogan

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

Mycotoxin Petfood Binder

Analytical Aspects of Mycotoxin Binders

Helping the liver to detoxify mycotoxins

Aflatoxins and animal health: Case studies from Africa

Various Impacts of Mycotoxins on Turkey Health and Performance

Payback News. Capturing Value with Creep Feeding. protein, vitamins, and minerals, on pasture. When done correctly,

MYCOTOXINS IN AQUACULTURE

Mycotoxin challenge in aquaculture feed. Maarten Jay van Schoonhoven, Aqua Care Manager Olmix

Mycotoxin Sampling & Interpretation

European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels 9 10 February Update on Fusarium mycotoxins - data from the starch industry

REGIONAL DIFFERENCES ON THE WORLDWIDE MYCOTOXIN OCCURRENCE. Copyright 2010 by Erber AG. Austria. All rights reserved.

EFSA mycotoxin occurrence, data request & exposure assessment

EAR AND KERNEL ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to October (and during storage)

MYCOTOXINS COMMONLY FOUND IN IOWA

Quality Grain Management Effects on the Feed Industry. Ben Weaver Regional Account Manager

Mycotoxin Lesions in the Slaughter House-Broilers

Monitoring & Surveillance Series

Food Safety Risk Assessment and Risk Management at a European Level

Mycotoxin Testing Solutions

Mycotoxins Overview and Sampling to Testing

Quality Issues Related to DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Info:

Feeding DDGS to Livestock and Poultry. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

The Key to What Sells Distiller s Grains. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

FEED ADDITIVES FOR MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFICATION EFFICACY & AUTHORISATION

Mycotoxin Analysis in Animal Feed by LC/MS/MS

Evaluation of the Effect of Mycotoxin Binders in Animal Feed on the Analytical Performance of Standardised Methods for

Mycotoxins and Toxicological Impact in Swine

The Use of Distiller s Grains By-products in Livestock and Poultry Diets. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

IN VIVO TRIALS ON RUMINANTS

Overview of Mycotoxins in India with special reference to Aflatoxins. F Waliyar

The Problems of Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle Rations

DIGESTON-1B. Produktionsgemeinschaft F.u.H. Egger Ges.m.b.H. A-8413 Mitterlabill 19, Tel , Fax ,

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF A COMMERCIAL PURIFIED PHYLOSILICATE TO REDUCE THE TOXICITY OF ZEARALENONE+DEOXYNIVALENOL IN GILTS.

Aflatoxin: What is it, and why worry? Doug Jardine Professor Kansas State University

What is Mycotoxins? Introduction to Mycotoxin and Mycotoxicosis in animals

The Impact of the Ethanol Industry on Pork Production

Escent L. The optimal solution for maximum profitability

Nuvisol Numisol Water-soluble supplements

Stored Grain Toxigenic Fungi

Guidelines for Feeding Broiler Litter to Beef Cattle

Balnellan Soil and Nutrient Network Meeting

Dr. Jerry Shurson. Department of Animal Science

PERFECT COMPONENTS. MAXIMUM RESULTS.

Molds & Mycotoxins. Corn supplies (for example from the Midwest)

Biofuels: Consequences for Feed Formulation

Product Purpose Statement for Commercial Feed Eli Miller University of Kentucky Lexington, KY May 15, 1997

Nutritional and Feeding Strategies to Minimize Nutrient Losses in Livestock Manure

Hepabial + Add the missing piece to the liver s metabolism

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

Grain feeding for ruminants

Introduction. Hypothesis

Mycotoxin toxicity to animals

Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) An Effective and Available Livestock and Poultry Feed Ingredient

European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels January 2007

Anti-Mycotoxin Additives

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

DDGS in Swine, Poultry, and Aquaculture Diets

Aflatoxin Material Properties

Coordinated by. Don Mahan The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210

Instituto Internacional de Investigación Animal, Querétaro, México, 2 Avimex, México, INTRODUCTION

FEED FOR YOUR ANIMALS UNIFEED. ó«`ø`«fƒ`j ANIMAL FEED

EFC-01 Fall Feeding Distiller Grains to Hogs. Ron Plain 1

Overview Part 2. Use of New Generation Corn DDGS in Feeds for Swine, Poultry, and Aquaculture. Why is there so much interest in feeding DDGS to swine?

An integrated approach to mycotoxin testing in the poultry feed chain. Bankok, March 2010

VALIDATION REPORT Ochratoxin A ELISA (According to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014)

Mycotoxins and Swine Performance

Feed and Alternative Uses for DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson and Dr. Sally Noll Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

EXCELLENCE IN YEAST EXCELLENT FOR FISH REAL BREWERS YEAST

Estimating Manure Nutrient Excretion

Natural-Pork. Swine Feeding Program

Zearalenone and Premature Lactation in Exported Dairy Cattle

Benefits and Limitations of Using DDGS in Swine Diets

Risk assessment of mycotoxins: the EFSA approach. Katleen Baert Scientific officer, EFSA

Nutritional requirements

Effect of experimental feed additives on aflatoxin in milk of dairy cows fed aflatoxin-contaminated diets

Mycotoxin ความท าทาย

THE ROLE OF MYCOTOXINS IN PMWS FACT OR FICTION

The 2009 Wisconsin Corn Crop

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST

MYCOTOXIN PREVENTION CLUSTER

Mycotoxins in the Poultry Industry

AFLATOXIN Most references to mycotoxin, unspecified, refer to Aflatoxin.

Feeding Considerations for Byproduct Feeding

Mycotoxins in Turkeys

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Feed ID Options /10/2016. DM% CP% TDN% Fat% Ca% P%

Foliar fungicide application on corn can enhance dairy cow performance

Transcription:

Free-Tox No escape THE POLYVALENT MYCOTOXIN BINDER

no escape the polyvalent mycotoxin binder 2 nnmycotoxins and moulds Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by moulds growing on crops in the field or which develop during storage under poor conditions of crops and/or finished feed (figure 1). Despite the fact that mycotoxins are tasteless, odorless and invisible, they are a big concern in animal production as they can cause severe economical losses due to their toxic effect after ingestion. The main negative effects in livestock are seen in performance, feed intake, reproduction, organ damage,... In animal nutrition aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ), trichothecenes (DON and T-2) ochratoxin A (OTA), fumonisin (FUM) and zearalenone (ZEA) are considered as the major mycotoxins, which are spread worldwide: 25% of world s crops are contaminated with mycotoxins (Source: FAO) 95% of feed mycotoxins are produced already in the feed (Source: Pioneer Hi-Bred) Occurrence and concentration are depending on environmental conditions INFECTED STRAW INFECTED GRAINS Field mycotoxins WHEAT CORN INFECTED WHEAT INFECTED CORN INFECTED GRAINS FIELD CONDITIONS 99Weather 99Crop rotation 99Soil conditioning 99Manure 99Fungicide 99Species 99Damage (insects, birds,...) BIOFUEL DDGS FIELD MOULD

no escape the polyvalent mycotoxin binder 3 FEED MILL FEED STORAGE BIN ANIMALS STORAGE AT FARM Storage mycotoxins STORAGE CONDITIONS 99Temperature (> 11 C) 99Air humidity (>70%) 99Moisture (>14%) 99Degree of oxygen (>0,5%) 99Feed remains STORAGE MOULD

no escape the polyvalent mycotoxin binder 4 nnorigin and maximum tolerable levels STORAGE FIELD Table 1: ORIGIN OF MAJOR MYCOTOXINS MOULD Aspergillus Penecillium Fusarium Claviceps MYCOTOXIN Aflatoxin Ochratoxin Ochratoxin Citrinin Deoxynivalenol T-2 Zearalenone Fumonisin Ergot Table 2 presents an overview of the maximum levels of contamination that are considered to be tolerable in complete feed, according to EU-legal guidance values. Comparing the animal species clearly indicates the difference in sensitivity between pigs, poultry and ruminants. Table 2: MAXIMUM TOLERABLE LEVEL IN COMPLETE FEED (DIRECTIVE 2002/32/FC) (RECOMMENDATION 2006/576/EC + 2013/ 165/EC) MYCOTOXIN SPECIES PPB pigs 20 poultry 20 AF B 1 dairy cattle 5 ruminants 20 young animals 10 DON pigs 900 calves 2000 piglets and gilts 100 ZEA fattening pigs and sows 250 ruminants 500 OTA pigs 50 poultry 100 pigs 5000 poultry 20000 FUM B 1 + B 2 calves 20000 ruminants 50000 horses 5000 fish 10000 T-2 & HT-2 all species 250

no escape the polyvalent mycotoxin binder 5 nnclinical effects Figure 1: CLINICAL EFFECTS + TARGET ORGANS Ochratoxin A Zearalenone Aflatoxin B₁ Clinical signs are not only related to the type and level of mycotoxin contamination, but also to the animal species, sex, age, health status and production level. A lower mycotoxin contamination (subtoxic) can substantially impair animal performance, and can even cause more severe problems on long term than an acute toxic dosage. Deoxynivalenol Fumonisin T-2 Kidney Reproduction Liver Digestive tract Immune system Carcinogen Nervous system Pulmonary system nnsynergism Due to synergism, the effect of different mycotoxins is bigger than the sum of the individual effects. OESTROGENIC IMMUNOTOXIC NEUROTO XI IC MUTAGEN C CARCINOGENIC nnfree-tox An efficient mycotoxin binder Free-Tox is specifically designed for animal feed to protect livestock against the negative effects of a broad spectrum of mycotoxins produced by moulds. Silicates (bentonite & clinoptilolite) Table 3: FREE-TOX Free-Tox is a combination of specifically selected and processed: Yeast cell walls Organic acids & salts

nnfree-tox Active components no escape the polyvalent mycotoxin binder 6 COMPONENT 1: ACID ACTIVATED BENTONITE Due to the natural electrical imbalance in bentonite, polar mycotoxins, such as aflatoxin, can be readily attracted to the bentonite. This way they are adsorbed quite easily on the outer surface, but only to a limited extent on the inner layers. Due to the fact that the cations in between the layers (Na+, Ca2+, ) keep those layers closely together and occupy a lot of space, it is even more difficult for larger, non-polar mycotoxins to be adsorbed between those layers. So, for non-polar mycotoxins such as ZEA, OTA, T-2, etc. this adsorption by a natural bentonite may not be appropriate to obtain a positive effect in animal production. By using a specific acid activation process, the overall layered structure of the bentonite in Free-Tox is drastically changed. This results in an increased specific surface area, in formation of bigger pores and thus in an increased adsorption capacity, also for larger mycotoxins such as ZEA. Due to the removal of interlaminary cations, the CEC of the bentonite will also be altered, reducing the risk of nutrient binding. Figure 2: ACID ACTIVATION OF FREE-TOX BENTONITE Exchangeable cation Mycotoxin Typical parallel layered structure of bentonite Acid activation Non-activated CEC: 94 meq/100g Less porous Specific surface: 35 m²/g Low adsorption capacity Acid activated CEC: 40 meq/100g More porous Specific surface: 290 m²/g High adsorption capacity COMPONENT 2: CLINOPTILOLITE Besides binding mycotoxins, clinoptilolite is also known to have other positive effects related to use in animal production. Free ammonium coming from undigested proteins is excreted via the litter which can cause ammonium pollution of the environment, and can also irritate foot pads of poultry resulting in foot pad lesions. Clinoptilolite has a specific selectivity for ammonium cations in the gastro intestinal tract, that results in binding them. So, thanks to the inclusion of clinoptilolite, Free-Tox contributes to reduced ammonium excretion in the litter, leading to less environmental pollution and less foot pad lesions (poultry). Figure 3: HONEYCOMB -LIKE STRUCTURE OF CLINOPTILOLITE

no escape the polyvalent mycotoxin binder 7 COMPONENT 3: YEAST CELL WALL The cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is composed of a dense network of ß-glucans and mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) tightly linked to each other by covalent bonds. The ß-glucans provide next to the mechanical strength of the wall, also the binding sites for mycotoxins. Not only the amount of ß-glucans (more ß-glucans = more binding sites) is important, but also the accessibility of these binding sites. Figure 4: YEAST HARVESTING N of cells Less access to ß-glucans and MOS, due to extra onset of covalent bonds from exponential to stationairy phase Yeast traditionally fermented ± same content ß-glucans and MOS Yeast - Free-Tox Better access to ß-glucans and MOS in GIT with less covalent bonds Yeast cell walls used in Free-Tox are extracted and harvested in the early stage of the fermentation (figure 4), during which the network of covalent bonds is less dense which offers more flexibility and a maximal accessibility of the mycotoxin binding sites. Many yeasts (mainly brewer s yeast) are harvested in a later stage of fermentation and have more covalent bonds, more rigidity and less accessibility of the binding sites. lag expon decline stat lysis Time nnfree-tox Safety in animal & feed Figure 5: TOLERANCE TEST (PIGLETS) Figure 6: VITAMIN E ADSORPTION ADG FC 120 364 362 1.91 1,92 1,90 110 ADG, g/day 360 358 356 354 352 350 1.83 359 361 Control Free-Tox (20 kg/mt) 1,88 1,86 1,84 1,82 1,80 1,78 FC vitamin E, mg/kg 100 90 80 70 60 91 93 Control Free-Tox (2 kg/mt) In literature, it s often suggested that there is a potential risk for nutrient binding with use of mycotoxin binders. To evaluate the effect of Free-Tox on nutrient binding, a tolerance trial was performed at the University of Leuven trial facility with inclusion of 20kg/MT (10x the advised maximum dosage) in an uncontaminated piglet diet. Given the result in figure 5, it s clear that no essential nutrient binding could have taken place. As shown in figure 6, it was also confirmed that no vitamin E is adsorbed at the maximum advised dosage of 2kg/MT Free-tox compared to a control feed.

no escape the polyvalent mycotoxin binder 8 nnfree-tox Trials PIGS TRIAL Table 4: TRIALS MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION (ppb) DON 1300 DOSE Free-Tox (kg/t) Improvement growth (%) Effect on FC (%) ZTC/W/1148 ZEA 70 2 +2.3 - UG/W/1304 DON 740 2 +2.7-3.0 ZTC/W/1311 20 +0.6-4.2 UG/W/1450 DON 5200 2 +3.9-4.0 ZTC/C/1632 DON 300 ZEA 25 1 +6.8-5.3 Free-Tox no escape BROILERS ZTC/W/1348 DON 220 2 +2.1-1.7 ZTC/W/1523 T-2 1500 2 +6.9-2.6 ZTC/C/1702 AFB1 300 2 +1.3-2.8 SOWS TRIAL ZTC/W/1609 W/1702 MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION (ppb) DON 120 ZEA 20 DON 300 ZEA 20 DOSE Free-Tox (g/d/sow) Improvement weight of weaned piglets (%) Day 0 Day 28 10 +9.8 +13.7 10 +4.2 na nnfree-tox Optimal solutions Table 5: FREE-TOX - PRODUCT RANGE SPECIES PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FREE -TOX Broad range mycotoxin binder Mycotoxin binding blend especially developed for ruminants Blend of silicates especially for Aflatoxin, Zearalenone and Ochratoxin Table 6: FREE-TOX - PREVENTIVE DOSAGE SPECIES PRODUCT AMOUNT Poultry & pigs Free-Tox, Free-Tox 220 0.5-1.0 kg / MT Dairy cows Free-Tox 311 15 g / cow / day Table 7: FREE-TOX - DOSAGE IN CASE OF SEVERE PROBLEMS SPECIES PRODUCT AMOUNT Broilers Free-Tox, Free-Tox 220 1.5-2.0 kg / MT Layers Free-Tox, Free-Tox 220 2.0 kg / MT Piglets < 25kg Free-Tox, Free-Tox 220 2.0-3.0 kg / MT Pigs > 25kg Free-Tox, Free-Tox 220 1.0-2.0 kg / MT Sows Free-Tox, Free-Tox 220 2.0-3.0 kg / MT Dairy cows Free-Tox 311 25-30 g / cow / day close up period + begin lactation 15 g / cow / day mid + end lactation Nutrex NV Achterstenhoek 5 2275 Lille Belgium Tel +32 14 88 31 11 info@nutrex.be www.nutrex.be FT20140915EN - V2