Advanced Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy Patients

Similar documents
Strain and Strain Rate Imaging How, Why and When?

Cardiotoxicity Effects of Chemotherapeutic Drugs

Guideline-Driven Care in Cardio- Oncology: Utilizing Recommendations Across Disciplines

Cardio-Oncology at MHI. Kasia Hryniewicz, M.D.

Cardiotoxicity from Chemotherapy : From Early Predictors to Therapeutics

Conflict of interest: none declared

03/14/2019. Scope of the Problem. Objectives

Global left ventricular circumferential strain is a marker for both systolic and diastolic myocardial function

2/2/2011. Strain and Strain Rate Imaging How, Why and When? Movement vs Deformation. Doppler Myocardial Velocities. Movement. Deformation.

VECTORS OF CONTRACTION

Tissue Doppler and Strain Imaging. Steven J. Lester MD, FRCP(C), FACC, FASE

Tissue Doppler and Strain Imaging

Cardio-oncology: Basics and Knowing When You Need an Echo

Cardio-oncology: Applying new echo technology to guide therapy

How to Evaluate the Heart of Elderly Patients

Multiparametric Mapping for Assessment of Cancer Therapy Related Cardiotoxicity

How To Perform Strain Imaging; Step By Step Approach. Maryam Bo Khamseen Echotechnoligist II EACVI, ARDMS, RCS King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center- Riyadh

CV Strategies to Mitigate Cardiotoxicity Pharmacologic Therapy Heart Failure Medications and Statins and For How Long

Tissue Doppler and Strain Imaging

Case Study in Cancer and Cardiotoxicity

Can point of care cardiac biomarker testing guide cardiac safety during oncology trials?

Cured of Cancer but now Let s Heal the Heart An exploration into the effects of cancer on the heart

HFPEF Echo with Strain vs. MRI T1 Mapping

Mechanisms of False Positive Exercise Electrocardiography: Is False Positive Test Truly False?

Exercise Testing/Echocardiography in Asymptomatic AS

Potpourri: Cardio-Oncology Cases

Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors

Chemotherapy- Associated Heart Failure. M. Birhan Yılmaz M.D, FESC Professor of Medicine Department of Cardiology Cumhuriyet University Sivas, TURKEY

Cardio-Oncology: Advancing Cardiovascular Care of the Oncology Patient

B-type Natriuretic Peptide in VHD: a Non-imaging Helper for the Cardiologist. Dr. Julien Magne, PhD Sart Tilman Liège, BELGIUM

Vasospasm and cardiac ischemia (Type 3 ) Hypertension Hypotension Arrhythmias Miscellaneous ( pericardial inflammation, valvular abnormalities )

Cardiovascular Imaging Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials

Cardio oncology Double Jeopardy

Μαρία Μπόνου Διευθύντρια ΕΣΥ, ΓΝΑ Λαϊκό

Redefining Cardiac Eligibility Thresholds in Oncology Trials. Role of Cardiovascular Core Labs

Velocity Vector Imaging as a new approach for cardiac magnetic resonance: Comparison with echocardiography

Disclosures. Objectives. SK continued. Two of my patients. First and foremost, why is this important??? 10/26/2016

Strain Imaging: Myocardial Mechanics Simplified and Applied

Dr. Dermot Phelan MB BCh BAO PhD European Society of Cardiology 2012

Heart Failure in Women: Dr Goh Ping Ping Cardiologist Asian Heart & Vascular Centre

Severe aortic stenosis should be operated before symptom onset CONTRA. Helmut Baumgartner

New aspects of Echocardiography in Hypertensive Heart Disease. Fausto J. Pinto, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC, FASE

Assessing Function by Echocardiography in VHD Asymptomatic Severe Organic MR. Dr. Julien Magne, PhD Sart Tilman Liège, BELGIUM

Novel echocardiographic modalities: 3D echo, speckle tracking and strain rate imaging. Potential roles in sports cardiology. Stefano Caselli, MD, PhD

Aortic valve Stenosis: Insights in the evaluation of LV function. Erwan DONAL Cardiologie CHU Rennes

Load and Function - Valvular Heart Disease. Tom Marwick, Cardiovascular Imaging Cleveland Clinic

Natural History and Echo Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis

Expert Consensus for MMI Evaluation of Adult Patients During and After Cancer Rx

Anthracycline cardiomypathy in breast cancer: detection and prevention in high-risk patients

Value of echocardiography in chronic dyspnea

Alicia Armour, MA, BS, RDCS

Practice Based Evidence for Treatment of Pregnancy and Anthracycline Cardiomyopathy

Abstract nr AHA, Chicago November European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, in press. Nr Peter Blomstrand

Highlights from EuroEcho 2009 Echo in cardiomyopathies

International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG, ISSN: , ISSN(Online): Vol.11 No.

Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

Prevalence of heart failure in Turkish adult population: Results from Heart failure Prevalence and Predictors in TurkeY (HAPPY) study

L ecocardiografia nello Scompenso Cardiaco Acuto e cronico: vecchi dogmi e nuovi trends.

Strain/Untwisting/Diastolic Suction

The importance of left atrium in LV diastolic function

Beginner s Guide to Strain: What should be in your lab in Disclosures

Νεότερα ςτην Υπερηχοκαρδιογραφία. Βαςίλειοσ Καμπερίδησ Clinical research fellow in Cardiology

OPTIMIZING ECHO ACQUISTION FOR STRAIN AND DIASTOLOGY

When is strain assessment mandatory?

Three-dimensional Wall Motion Tracking:

Cardiotoxicity: The View of the Cardiologist

LV FUNCTION ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS BEYOND EJECTION FRACTION

Expert Consensus for MMI Evaluation of Adult Patients During and After Cancer Rx. No Real or Potential Conflict of Interests for this Talk CTRCD

Left ventricular diastolic function and filling pressure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Stephen Glen ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE AND LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION

22 nd Annual Conference of the Saudi Heart Association Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Γυναίκα 67 ετών 2 η μετεγχειρητική ημέρα μετά αφαίρεση μονήρους πνευμονικού όγκου στον άνω λοβό του αριστερού πνεύμονα Οξύ πρόσθιο STEMI

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction by Doppler and 2D Speckle-tracking Imaging in Patients with Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

Cardiotoxic Effects of Chemotherapy on Pediatric and Adult Survivors of Cancer

Evalua&on)of)Le-)Ventricular)Diastolic) Dysfunc&on)by)Echocardiography:) Role)of)Ejec&on)Frac&on)

Cancer survivors. Half of Cancer Survivors Die of Other Conditions. Cause of Death in Cancer Survivors

The Early Predictive Value of Right Ventricular Strain in Epirubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Patients with Breast Cancer

Ian Paterson, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta

New Cardiac Guidelines Where They Agree, Where They Differ, and How Does It Affect Patient Care

2019 Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Performance Measures

Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography

ST2 in Heart Failure. ST2 as a Cardiovascular Biomarker. Competitive Model of ST2/IL-33 Signaling. ST2 and IL-33: Cardioprotective

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 57, No. 22, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /$36.

Implementing New Technology

Aortic Valve Replacement Improves Outcome in Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction: PRO!

Is normal ejection fraction equivalent to normal systolic function?

Chamber Quantitation Guidelines: What is New?

Renal Cell Cancer and TKIs:

Cardiac Health in Duchenne: What we are Learning from Cardiac MRI

Diastolic Dysfunction: Hypertension to Hypertrophy to Heart Failure

Evaluation of the Right Ventricle and Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death

CardioOncology: The Promise and Pitfalls of Personalized Medicine

Advanced Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Degenerative MR. Dr Julien Magne, PhD University of Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Liege, Belgium

Progression of atrial fibrillation: can we prevent it? Early catheter ablation will stop progression of atrial fibrillation pro

Chronic Primary Mitral Regurgitation

Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know

: A Study Examining the Prevalence of Transthyretin Mutations in Subjects Suspected of Having Cardiac Amyloidosis

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction >35%

Μυοκαρδιοπάθεια από τη θεραπεία του καρκίνου. Δημήτρης Φαρμάκης Ιατρική Σχολή ΕΚΠΑ Αθήνα

Altered left ventricular geometry and torsional mechanics in high altitude-induced pulmonary hypertension:

Transcription:

Advanced Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy Patients Juan Carlos Plana, MD, FACC, FASE Co-Director, Cardio-Oncology Center Section of Cardiovascular Imaging Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic

Outlook Introduction with a case presentation Early detection of cardio-toxicity using 2D- based strain imaging Extended prediction of cardio-toxicity using 2D-based strain imaging Optimal myocardial deformation index and cut-off values Putting it all together Conclusions

1.Introduction with a case study

Case study 47 year old female Invasive ductal carcinoma (ER-, PR-, Her2-neu+) Docetaxel, Carboplatinum and Trastuzumab followed by mastectomy Baseline EF=65% EF=58% 3 months later while on Trastuzumab What to do?

LVEF which is widely used to monitor cardiac systolic function during and after chemotherapy, fails to detect subtle alterations in LV function. Once the LVEF has decreased in patients treated with cardio-toxic agents, it may be too late to reverse the course of the cardiomyopathy Introduction More sensitive and specific markers of chemotherapy-induced injury and subsequent dysfunction, may allow for better adaptation of oncologic and cardiac

Mor-Avi, et al.jase 2011;24:277-313

2. Early detection and prediction of cardiotoxicity

Objective To evaluate whether sensitive echocardiographic measurements and biomarkers could predict later cardiac dysfunction in chemotherapy-treated patients

Methods and results 43 patients Anthracyclines followed by Trastuzumab Echocardiograms and biomarkers were measured at baseline / after anthracyclines (3 months) / 6 months Cardiotoxicity: Symptomatic drop of 5 points of EF to an EF <55%, asymptomatic drop of 10 points to EF <55%

Variables measured LVEF Markers of diastolic function Peak longitudinal and radial strain NT - pro BNP c Tn I

Results 9 patients (21%) developed cardio-toxicity (1 at 3 months, 8 at 6 months) 2 patients developed symptomatic CHF

Univariate Analysis of Predictors of Cardiotoxicity Cardiotoxicity P value (prediction No Yes of Variable (N=34) (N=9) Cardiotoxicity) OR CI Change in left ventricular ejection fraction at 3 months (%) 1.2 ± 9 5.6 ± 8 0.19 5.5 0.45-100 Change in longitudinal strain at 3 months (%) 3 ± 10 15 ± 8 0.01 500 6.7-0.11x10 6 Change in radial strain at 3 months (%) 2 ± 23 22 ± 22 0.02 250 4-0.4x10 5 Change in N-terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide at 3 months (%) 46 ± 240 56 ± 190 0.91 1 0.65-1.4 Elevation high sensitivity cardiac Troponin I at 3 months 6 (18%) 6 (67%) 0.006 9 1.8-50

Univariate Analysis of Cardiotoxicity - Diastolic Indices Cardiotoxicity P Value No Yes Prediction of Variable (N=34) (N=9) Cardiotoxicity) OR CI ΔLAD at 3 months, mm 0.01 ± 0.12 0.05 ± 0.11 0.19 0.01 8.68x10-6 6.90 ΔE, at 3 months, % 5 ± 20 1 ± 21 0.47 4.57 0.12 201.2 ΔE/A at 3 months, % 2 ± 24 10 ± 41 0.28 4.05 0.31 61.47 ΔE at 3 months, % 6 ± 16 7 ± 17 0.80 0.53 0.003 7.59 ΔE/E at 3 months, % 3 ± 25 15 ± 31 0.25 0.17 0.007 3.39

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Value of the Predictors of Cardiotoxicity Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV 10% decrease long strain 7/9 (78%) 27/34 (79%) 7/14 (50%) 27/29 (93%) Increased ctnl at 3 months 6/9 (67%) 28/34 (82%) 6/12 (50%) 28/31 (90%) 10% decrease long strain and increased ctnl at 3 months 5/9 (55%) 33/34 (97%) 5/6 (83%) 33/37 (89%) 10% decrease long strain or increased ctnl at 3 months 8/9 (89%) 22/34 (65%) 8/20 (40%) 22/23 (97%)

3. Extended prediction of cardiotoxicity

Objective To evaluate the long term predictive value of these measurements in a larger cohort

Results 81 consecutive patients 26 patients developed cardio-toxicity (32%) 3 at the end of anthracyclines, 23 while on Trastuzumab 5 (6%) of the patients were symptomatic

1 1 2 1

Results LVEF measured at the completion of anthracyclines was not predictive of later cardio-toxicity ( P=0.075) Change in EF was not predictive (continuous (P=0.081)/ discrete 8 (P=0.23)or 10%(P=0.34)cut offs Peak GLS was predictive of cardiotoxicity (P=0.0003) Neither radial nor circumferential were predictive (P=0.25 and 0.67

26(32%) 9 (11%)

EF < 50% 15 patients developed EF < 50% 5 patients had EF<50% at end of follow up (6%).

4. Optimal myocardial deformation index and cut-off values

Objectives We sought the optimal myocardial deformation index for prediction of cardio-toxicity at 12 months

Methods 100 women (51±12 y) receiving chemotherapy 46 received simultaneous anthracycline and trastuzumab. Conventional echo (mitral annular s and e velocity) and myocardial deformation indices (global longitudinal peak systolic strain [GLS], strain rate [SR-s] and early diastolic strain rate [SR-e]) from speckle tracking were measured at baseline, 6 and 12m. Cardiotoxicity was defined by a decrement of EF >10%.

JACC 3/27/2012 E1245

Cut-off (%) Sen (%) Spe (%) ΔGLSR-S -12.3 75 72 ΔGLS -12.1 69 76 ΔGLSR-E 10.0 69 69 Δs -3.4 100 34

Study Cut-off Sensitivity Specificity MDACC/M GH -19% 77% 71% CCF/Brisba ne -12.1% change 69% 76%

5. Putting it all together

Early detection of Type II toxicity during F/U using strain EF Cardiotoxicity Cardioprotection No criteria by EF Baseline strain available Drop >12% as ompared to baseline Baseline strain un-available Strain -19% or better No Yes No Yes Continue therapy Sub-clinical LV dysfunction Consider cardio-protection Continue therapy

Change in strain: 25-5 - 19 / 25.5 =25%

Early detection of Type II toxicity during F/U using strain EF Cardiotoxicity Cardioprotection o criteria by EF (Asymptomatic drop of 7 points) Baseline strain available Drop >12%(25.5%) as compared to Baseline strain un-available Strain -19% or better No baseline Yes No Yes Continue therapy Sub-clinical LV dysfunction Consider cardio-protection Continue therapy

Conclusions GLS and Troponin I measured at the completion of anthracyclines are useful in the prediction of subsequent cardiotoxicity and may help guide treatment to avoid cardiac side effects

Thanks for your attention

Circulation 2011;124(10021):A13998

Baseline: -20.1% F/U: -17% (15.4% drop)

Breast cancer pts n=100 Baseline echo & trastuzumab initiation exclude Pts taking BB before chemo n=8 Early follow-up visit GLS >12% decrease or EF decrease BB start n=8 GLS no change n=59 GLS >12% decrease n=25 BB(+) BB(-) Follow-up echo 45

BB(-) BB(+) Delta GLS BB(-) :-1.6±2.5 BB(+):-3.3±1.4 p=0.008 p=0.028 p=0.005 Baseline 6m 12m -20.8±2.1-16.8±2.4-18.4±2.7 BB(-) Delta EF BB(-) :0.1±4.6 BB(+):4.5±6.0 p=0.861 p=0.098

Thanks for your attention.

A retrospective look Prospectively entered data in EPIC 197 patients with or without anthracycline regimen 2005-2010 14 patients new diagnosis of CHF (7.1%) 72 patients developed LV dysfunction (36.54%)

Study Follow up LV dysfunction CHF Cochrane metaanalysis CCF retrospectiv e MDACC/M GH CCF/Brisba ne 3 years 11% 2.6% up to 4y 36% 7.1% 18 months 32% 6% 12 months 20% -