UNmasking Dormant Electrical Reconduction by Adenosine TriPhosphate

Similar documents
European Heart Journal Advance Access published August 30, 2015

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: in Whom and How

ΚΑΤΑΛΥΣΗ ΚΟΛΠΙΚΗΣ ΜΑΡΜΑΡΥΓΗΣ. ΥΠΕΡ. Michalis Efremidis MD Second Department of Cardiology Evangelismos General Hospital

Stand alone maze: when and how?

Is cardioversion old hat? What is new in interventional treatment of AF symptoms?

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Indications and tools for improvement of the success rate of the method. Konstantinos P.

What s new in my specialty?

Transient Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Stroke after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Long Standing Persistent AF ; CPVI is enough for it

Lack of Effect of Beta-blocker Therapy in Patients with ST-elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction in PCI Era

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Strategy and Outcome Predictors Shih-Ann Chen MD

Long-Term Outcome and Risks of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Outcomes of AF Ablation

Supplementary Online Content

Hybrid Ablation of AF in the Operating Room: Is There a Need? MAZE III Procedure. Spectrum of Atrial Fibrillation

Ablation Should Not Be Used as Primary Therapy for Treatment of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Purse-String Pv Box Isolation: A Less Invasive Modified Maze Procedure For Non-Mitral Atrial Fibrillation

Κατάλυση παροξυσμικής κολπικής μαρμαρυγής Ποια τεχνολογία και σε ποιους ασθενείς; Χάρης Κοσσυβάκης Καρδιολογικό Τμήμα Γ.Ν.Α. «Γ.

Invasive and Medical Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation. Thomas J Dresing, MD Section of Electrophysiology and Pacing Cleveland Clinic

Interventional solutions for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure

AF :RHYTHM CONTROL BY DR-MOHAMMED SALAH ASSISSTANT LECTURER CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT

Basics of Atrial Fibrillation. By Mini Thannikal NP-BC Mount Sinai St Luke s Hospital New York, NY

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Selection and Outcomes

Atrial Fibrillation 2009

The HISTORIC-AF TRIAL

INTRODUCTION. Key Words:

RADAR-AF Trial. A Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Drivers vs. Circumferential Pulmonary Vein

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most sustained cardiac arrhythmia

AF ABLATION Concepts and Techniques

Role of LAA isolation in AF cure

AF ablation Penn experience. Optimal approach to the ablation of PAF: Importance of identifying triggers 9/25/2009

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter Ablation of Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Ruolo della ablazione della fibrillazione atriale nello scompenso cardiaco

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Recent Clinical Trials That Changed (or not) My Practice

SURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DURING MITRAL VALVE SURGERY THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGICAL TRIALS NETWORK

Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure as a. treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation Procedures Data Summary. Participant STS Period Ending 12/31/2016

New Parameter to Predict Recurrence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation by the P-Wave Signal-Averaged Electrocardiogram

ABLATION OF CHRONIC AF

Who Gets Atrial Fibrilla9on..?

Debate-STAR AF 2 study. PVI is not enough

Innovations in AF Management

Dipen Shah Cardiology Service, University Hospitals, Geneva Switzerland

Atrial Fibrillation: Catheter Ablation with New Technologies, Improving Quality of Life and Outcomes in Various Disease States

Nationwide Survey of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: The Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (J-CARAF)

Peri-Mitral Atrial Flutter with Partial Conduction Block between Left Atrium and Coronary Sinus

Supplementary Online Content

Rebuttal. Jerónimo Farré MD 2010

Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

The EP Perspective: Should We Do Hybrid Ablation, and Who Should We Do It On?

Mapping and Ablation in AF: how can we evaluate the lesion formation?

3/25/2017. Program Outline. Classification of Atrial Fibrillation

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

ABLATION TECHNIQUES FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Trattamento interventistico

Trial design and selection criteria

Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation 2010 and Beyond

Polypharmacy - arrhythmic risks in patients with heart failure

Biatrial Maze or PVI to Ablate Afib? Marc Gillinov, MD

In Whom and When Should Atrial Fibrillation Ablation be Considered?

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians

Effect of Left Atrial Ablation on the Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ABlation vs ANtiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation (CABANA) Trial

Cost and Prevalence of A fib. Atrial Fibrillation: Guideline Directed Treatment. Prevalence of A Fib. Risk Factors for A Fib. Risk Factors for A Fib

480 April 2004 PACE, Vol. 27

Management of atrial fibrillation in heart failure

Minimally Invasive Stand Alone Cox-Maze Procedure For Patients With Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Linear Ablation Should Not Be a Standard Part of Ablation in Persistent AF. Disclosures. LA Ablation vs. Segmental Ostial Ablation With PVI for PAF

Ablation Update and Case Studies. Lawrence Nair, MD, FACC Director of Electrophysiology Presbyterian Heart Group

Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Executive Summary

Geriatric Grand Rounds

Treating Atrial Fibrillation. Richard Schilling. St Bartholomew's Hospital, Queen Mary s University of London

AF Ablation in 2015 Why, Who, What and How? Steve Wilton ACC Rockies, Banff March 10, 2015

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence With Corticosteroids After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Possible clinical and hemodynamic predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

dronedarone, 400mg, film-coated tablets (Multaq ) SMC No. (636/10) Sanofi-aventis Ltd

A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: OUR EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONVERGENT PROCEDURE

Raphael Rosso MD, Yuval Levi Med. Eng., Sami Viskin MD Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

AF Today: W. For the majority of patients with atrial. are the Options? Chris Case

PVI and What Else for Persistent AF Lessons Learned from STAR AF 2 CCCEP 2015 October 31, New York

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Jesus M. Paylos, C. Ferrero, L. Azcona, A. Morales, M. A. Vargas, L. Lacal, V. Gomez Tello.

Rate and Rhythm Control of Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Prosthetic Mitral Valve

A Cryo Anatomical Procedure to Everyone? Saverio Iacopino, FACC, FESC

Why to monitor AF ablation success?


CATHETER ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION WHEN and HOW

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Heart Failure

Ablation Index : A new standard for Safety and Efficacy. Dr Franck Halimi Hôpital Privé Parly 2 Le Chesnay, France

» A new drug s trial

PEDIATRIC SVT MANAGEMENT

PRIMARY RESULTS OF RF CATHETER ABLATION FOR AF IN VIETNAM HEART INSTITUTE. PHAM QUOC KHANH, MD, PhD. et al Vietnam Heart Institute

Contemporary Strategies for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Ablazione della fibrillazione atriale: dubbi presenti e prospettive future

La terapia non anticoagulante nel paziente con FA secondo le Linee Guida F. CONROTTO

Percutaneous Transvenous Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Stroke

Evaluation of the Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Pulmonary Venous Ablation

Transcription:

KPAF trial The Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation (KPAF) trial is a 2x2 factorial randomized controlled trial, composed of the UNDER-ATP and EAST-AF trials.

Efficacy of adenosine triphosphate guided ablation for atrial fibrillation: UNmasking Dormant Electrical Reconduction by Adenosine TriPhosphate Atsushi Kobori, Koichi Inoue, Kazuaki Kaitani, Yuko Nakazawa, Toshiya Kurotobi, Itsuro Morishima, Fumiharu Miura, Takeshi Morimoto, Takeshi Kimura, and Satoshi Shizuta Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, Tenri Hospital, Shiroyama Hospital, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hyogo College of Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kansai region, Japan.

Background Adenosine (triphosphate) has been reported to provoke dormant electrical conduction between the left atrium and Pulmonary Veins (PV) after an initially successful PV isolation (PVI). Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) guided PVI has been shown to improve the outcomes of AF ablation. Hachiya H, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(4):392. Matsuo S, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(7):704. Kumagai K, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(5):494. Macle L, et al. Lancet 2015;386,9994:672.

Aim The aim of this large-scale (>2,000) randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of ATP-guided PVI as compared with conventional PVI in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Patients undergoing a 1st catheter ablation for AF, N=3722 Between November 2011 and March 2014 at 19 cardiovascular centers in Japan Excluded, N=1602 UNDER-ATP trial Excluded from EAST-AF trial: N=35 ATP-Guided PVI N=1113 Ablation procedure EAST-AF trial Conventional PVI N=1007 Excluded from EAST-AF trial: N=41 AAD for 90 days Control AAD for 90 days Control N=457 (41.1%) N=621 (55.8%) N=561 (55.7%) N=405 (40.2%) Withdrawal of consent to participate in the study, N=7 ATP-Guided PVI N=1112 Death: N=2 Lost to FU: N=3 Death: N=3 Lost to FU: N=3 Conventional PVI N=1001 1-Year FU Data Available N=1107 (99.5%) 1-Year FU Data Available N=995 (99.4%)

Eligibility Inclusion criteria Planned De Novo ablation for paroxysmal, persistent or long-lasting AF Exclusion criteria Age < 20 or >80 Contraindications to or intolerance to ATP or AADs Severe bronchial asthma Severe vasospastic angina Substantial bradycardia Severe heart failure (LVEF < 40% or NYHA VI) Severe LA enlargement (LAD > 55mm) Very long-lasting AF 5 years

Style of the PVI Endoscopic AP view of the reconstructed LA PA view of the reconstructed LA

End point of the PVI I III V5 RSPV Disappearance of PV potentials RIPV

I III V1 ATP test Recurrence of PV conduction followed AV block by ATP infusion RSPV RIPV CS In ATP-guided PVI, 0.4 mg/kg-body-weight of ATP was rapidly administered. When dormant conduction was provoked, additional ablations were performed until the disappearance of any dormant conductions.

Endpoint Primary endpoint Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias* at 1-year with a blanking period of 90 days post ablation. *Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias was defined as documented AF/AFL/AT lasting for >30 seconds or requiring repeat ablation, hospital admission or usage of Vaughan Williams class I or III AADs.

Clinical Follow-up Periodical visits: @ 3-, 6-, and 12-month (ECG, blood samples etc.) 2-week ambulatory electrogram recording: @ hospital-discharge, 6-month and 12-month 24-hour Holter monitoring : @ 6- and 12-month Additional symptom driven ECG-monitoring

Baseline Characteristics All Patients (N=2113) ATP-guided PVI (N=1112) Conventional PVI (N=1001) P value Age (years) 63.3±10.0 58.6 ± 8.6 68.5 ± 8.8 <0.001 Male 1589 (74.7) 856 (77.0) 723 (72.7) 0.01 History of AF (m) 25.9 [9.0-62.9] 23.3 [8.8-60.8] 26.4 [9.4-67.5] 0.37 Type of AF 0.34 Paroxysmal 1420 (67.2) 737 (66.3) 683 (68.2) Persistent 479 (22.7) 245 (22.0) 234 (23.4) Long-lasting 214 (10.1) 130 (11.7) 84 (8.4) CHADS 2 score <0.001 0, 1 1557 (73.7) 910 (81.8) 647 (64.6) 2 356 (16.8) 141 (12.7) 215 (21.5) 3 200 (9.5) 61 (5.5) 139 (13.9) LVEF (%) 64.3±7.6 64.2±7.9 64.6±7.3 0.22 LA dimension (mm) 39.0±6.2 38.9±6.3 39.2±6.2 0.26

Procedural Characteristics ATP-guided PVI (N=1112) Conventional PVI (N=1001) P value 3-dimensional mapping system (%) 1112 (100) 1000 (99.9) 0.47 Double circular catheters 820 (73.7) 773 (77.4) 0.05 Deflectable sheath 606 (54.5) 575 (57.4) 0.17 Irrigation catheter (%) 1102 (99.1) 984 (98.3) 0.10 Strategy Extensive encircling PVI (%) 1110 (99.8) 996 (99.5) 0.20 CFAE ablation (%) 131 (11.8) 107 (10.7) 0.43 Left atrial roof line (%) 197 (17.7) 212 (21.2) 0.04 Mitral isthmus line (%) 74 (6.7) 78 (7.8) 0.31 GP ablation (%) 59 (5.3) 59 (5.9) 0.56 Tricuspid valve isthmus ablation (%) 803 (77.0) 745 (74.4) 0.25 SVC isolation (%) 155 (13.9) 140 (14.0) 0.98

PVI and ATP test ATP-guided PVI (N=1112) Conventional PVI (N=1001) P value Spontaneous PV reconnection (%) 474 (42.6) 419 (41.9) 0.72 Time from initial PVI to PV reconnection, minutes [IQR] 43 [30-60] 43 [30-60] 0.94 Time from initial PVI to ATP test, minutes [IQR] 57 [33-87] Dormant PV conduction by ATP (%) 307 (27.6) Left sided PV (%) 194 (17.4) Right sided PV (%) 172 (15.5) Number of additional applications for dormant conduction [IQR] 5 [3-9] Elimination of all dormant conduction (%) 302 (98.4) Total duration of energy applications for PVI, minutes [IQR] 37.1 [28.7-45.6] 35.1 [27.3-44.3] 0.005 Time from initial success to final check in PVI, minutes [IQR] 67 [42-96] 61 [38-91] <0.001

Procedure and Safety Outcomes ATP-guided PVI (N=1112) Conventional PVI (N=1001) P value Total number of energy applications 106±61 101±40 0.02 Total duration of energy applications, minutes [IQR] 47.1 [35.3-59.6] 45.5 [34.7-58.8] 0.11 Total procedure time, minutes [IQR] 195 [163-230] 192 [160-230] 0.22 Total fluoroscopy time, minutes [IQR] 58.4 [35.5-86.8] 58.0 [34.1-88.2] 0.99 Total radiation dose, mgy [IQR] 399 [141-756] 370 [164-721] 0.92 Complications Cardiac tamponade requiring drainage (%) 10 (0.9) 12 (1.2) 0.50 Stroke (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 0.47 Asthma attack (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) - Ischemic cardiac events (%) 1 (0.1) 4 (0.4) 0.20

Event-free Survival from the Primary Endpoint Freedom from Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (%) 100 80 Blanking 60 Period 40 20 ATP-Guided PVI Conventional PVI Log-rank P=0.19 Adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-1.09, P=0.25 0 0 90 180 270 365 450 Days After First Ablation 68.7% 67.1% Interval 0d 90d 180d 270d 365d 450d ATP-Guided PVI; N at risk 1112 1111 896 800 625 190 Conventional PVI; N at risk 1001 999 787 701 533 155

Paroxysmal AF Persistent / Long-Lasting AF Freedom from Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (%) 100 80 60 40 20 Blanking Period ATP-Guided PVI Conventional PVI Log-rank P=0.23 Adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.20, P=0.56 0 0 90 180 270 365 450 Days After First Ablation 72.8% 71.4% Freedom from Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Blanking Period ATP-Guided PVI Conventional PVI Log-rank P=0.40 Adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.17, P=0.33 0 90 180 270 365 450 Days After First Ablation 60.7% 57.7% Interval 0d 180d 365d ATP-Guided PVI; N at risk 737 616 434 AAD group; N at risk 683 562 386 Interval 0d 180d 365d ATP-Guided PVI; N at risk 375 281 191 AAD group; N at risk 318 225 147

Primary Endpoint in the Prespecified Patient Subgroups No. of Patients Adjusted HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) P for Interaction Age 0.33 70 years 631 1.33 (0.52-2.77) < 70 years 1482 0.86 (0.7-1.06) Gender 0.08 Male 1579 0.84 (0.67-1.04) Female 534 1.08 (0.69-1.74) Type of Atrial Fibrillation 0.90 Paroxysmal 1420 0.93 (0.72-1.20) Persistent / Long Lasting 693 0.86 (0.64-1.17) 90-day use of AAD 0.97 AAD 1016 0.89 (0.64-1.26) No AADs 1022 0.87 (0.68-1.11) Left Atrial Dimension 0.78 40 mm 952 0.80 (0.61-1.07) < 40 mm 1146 0.99 (0.75-1.31) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 ATP-Guided PVI Better Conventional PVI Better

Limitations Randomization programming error regarding age, requiring adjustment by the Cox proportional hazard model No continuous ECG-monitoring

Conclusions We found no significant reduction in the incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after catheter ablation of AF with the ATP-guided PVI as compared to the conventional PVI.

Efficacy of Antiarrhythmic Drugs Short-Term Use After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation trial Kazuaki Kaitani, Koichi Inoue, Atsushi Kobori, Yuko Nakazawa, Toshiya Kurotobi, Itsuro Morishima, Masaki Naito, Takeshi Morimoto, Takeshi Kimura, and Satoshi Shizuta. Tenri Hospital, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiroyama Hospital, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Nara Prefecture Western Medical Center, Hyogo College of Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kansai region, Japan.

Background - Transient atrial tachyarrhythmias occur frequently in the first few months following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. - A sizable portion of early recurrence is related to the irritability from the ablation procedure. - This phenomenon is a strong predictor of later recurrence of atrial arrhythmias.

Hypothesis - 90 days use of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) following AF ablation could reduce the incidence of early arrhythmia recurrence and thereby promote reverse remodeling of left atrium, leading to improved long-term clinical outcomes.

Patient flowchart ATP-Guided PVI N=1113 UNDER-ATP trial Completed ablation procedure EAST-AF trial N=2044 Conventional PVI N=1007 Excluded from EAST-AF trial: N=76 AAD for 90 days N=1018 Withdrawal of consent to participate in the study, N=6 Control N=1026 AAD group N=1016 Control group N=1022 Death: N=3 Lost to FU: N=1 Death: N=2 Lost to FU: N=5 1-Year FU Data Available N=1012 1-Year FU Data Available N=1015

Endpoints Primary endpoint Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias* at 1-year with a blanking period of 90 days post ablation. Secondary endpoints Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias* within the blanking period of 90 days Adverse events/safety *Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias was defined as documented AF/AFL/AT lasting for >30 seconds or requiring repeat ablation, hospital admission or usage of Vaughan Williams class I or III AADs.

Baseline Characteristics AAD group (N=1016) Control group (N=1022) P value Age (years) 65.9 ± 9.6 60.7 ± 9.6 <0.001 Male 741 (72.9) 789 (77.2) 0.03 History of AF (m) 24.7 [8.8-62.8] 26.1 [9.3-62.9] 0.41 Body Weight (kg) 64.7 ± 11.5 67.4 ± 12.7 <0.001 Type of AF 0.48 Paroxysmal 692 (68.1) 684 (66.9) Persistent 232 (22.8) 229 (22.4) Long-lasting 92 (9.1) 109 (10.7) CHADS 2 score <0.001 0, 1 711 (81.8) 793 (77.6) 2 192 (18.9) 153 (15.0) e3 113 (11.1) 76 (7.4) LVEF (%) 64.5 ± 7.8 64.2 ± 7.8 0.42 LA dimension (mm) 38.9 ± 6.2 39.0 ± 6.2 0.77

Rate of medication use at discharge 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 AAD group Control group

Antiarrhythmic drugs used in the AAD group Amiodarone; 136.7 ± 44.2mg/d Sotalol; 110.0 ± 41.4mg/d Bepridil; 98.9 ± 24.4 mg/d Pilsicanide; 93.5 ± 31.5mg/d ClassⅢ Aprindine 32.3 ±11.5mg/d Disopyramide; 279.6 ± 52.4mg/d Civenzoline; 153.4 ± 69.2mg/d ClassⅠ Flecanide; 104.1 ± 28.4 mg/d AAD; Average dosage mg/d Propafenone; 325.6 ± 57.1mg/d

Secondary endpoint Freedom from AF/AT during the blanking period 100 Freedom from Atrial Tachyarrhythmias 80 60 40 20 AAD group Control group Log-rank P = 0.002 Adjusted HR 0.84, 95%CI (0.73-0.96), P = 0.01 59.0% RRR=14.1% 52.1% 0 0 Days Since First Ablation 30 60 90 Interval 0d 30d 60d 90d AAD group; N at risk 1016 640 623 600 Control group; N at risk 1022 569 549 532

Primary endpoint Freedom from AF/AT at 12-months of follow-up 100 Freedom from Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (%) 80 60 40 20 Blanking Period AAD group 69.5% Control group 67.8% Log-rank P = 0.41 Adjusted HR 0.93, 95%CI (0.79-1.09), P = 0.38 0 Days Since First Ablation 0 90 180 270 365 450 Interval 0d 90d 180d 270d 365d 450d AAD group; N at risk 1016 1016 828 737 570 163 Control group; N at risk 1022 1021 810 723 557 165

Paroxysmal AF Persistent / Long-Lasting AF Freedom from Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Blanking Period AAD group Control group Log-rank P = 0.95 Adjusted HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.79-1.20, P=0.80 0 90 180 270 365 450 Days After First Ablation 72.5 % Freedom from Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (%) 100 80 63.0 % Blanking 60 72.3 % Period 40 20 0 AAD group Control group Log-rank P = 0.23 Adjusted HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.68-1.12, P=0.28 0 90 180 270 365 450 Days After First Ablation 58.7 % Interval 0d 180d 365d AAD group; N at risk 692 582 402 Control group; N at risk 684 565 395 Interval 0d 180d 365d AAD group; N at risk 324 246 168 Control group; N at risk 338 245 162

Adverse events AAD group (N=1016) Control group (N=1022) Death (%) 3 (0.3) 2 (0.2) Cardiovascular death (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) Ischemic Stroke / TIA (%) 3 (0.3) 1 (0.1) Systemic embolism (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) Intracranial hemorrhage (%) 4 (0.4) 2 (0.2) Myocardial infarction (%) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) Hospitalization for heart failure (%) 4 (0.4) 4 (0.4) Cardioversion 113 (11.1) 117 (11.5) 90 Days 85 (8.4) 104 (10.2) > 90 Days 28 (2.7) 13 (1.3) Side effect of AAD (%) 41 (4.1) - Bradycardia 13 (1.3) - Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (%) 0 (0) - Others 28 (3.0) -

Limitations Randomization programming error regarding age, requiring adjustment by the Cox proportional hazard model No continuous ECG-monitoring Differences in the recommended AADs and their dosages between the present study and the Western AF guidelines

Conclusions Short-term AAD treatment for 90 days following AF ablation significantly reduced the AT/AF recurrence during the treatment period of 90 days. However, it did not lead to improved clinical outcomes at the 1-year follow-up.

Acknowledgments and Funding Acknowledgments Division of Cardiology, Tenri Hospital/ Cardiovascular center, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital/ Division of Cardiology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital/ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Shiga University of Medical Science/ Cardiovascular center, Shiroyama Hospital/ Department of Cardiology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital/ Department of Cardiology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital/ Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital/ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nara Prefecture Western Medical Center/ First Department of Internal Medicine, Nara Medical University/ Division of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center/ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine/ Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center/ Department of Cardiology, Himeji Cardiovascular Center/ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okamura Memorial Hospital/ Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital/ Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center/ Cardiovascular Center, Tazuke Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital/ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School/ Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine Funding This study was supported by Research Institute for Production Development in Kyoto, Japan.