Nothing more controversial than PGS

Similar documents
Accuracy of assessing embryo ploidy of human embryos with PGS in association with IVF

Androgen supplementation in women with low functional ovarian reserve

Debate: Natural vs. Stimulated Cycles Stimulated Cycles

Ontogeny of the new hypo-androgenic PCOS phenotype

When is it the right time to refer a patient into egg donation? It should always be the patient s choice

How to supplement hypo-androgenic women correctly

Evidence-based treatment of POR and POF. Ovarian Club X and CoGEN in Asia December 16-17, 2017 Hong Kong

Timing of Ovulation Induction Matters in Women with Low Functional Ovarian Reserve

A journey into the future of IVF

UNDERSTANDING THE GENETIC HEALTH OF EMBRYOS

CRB-AAB MAY 18, David F. Albertini,Ph.D. Director of Laboratories, Senior Scientist Center For Human Reproduction

Results of the Virtual Academy of Genetics (VAoGEN) questionnaire on Mosaicism in PGS

IVF AND PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR ANEUPLOIDY (PGT-A) WHAT THE COMMUNITY PHYSICIAN NEEDS TO KNOW

Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Is NextGen Likely to be the Final Best Platform and What are its Advantages and Quirks?

Increase your chance of IVF Success. PGT-A Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGS 2.0)

NEXCCS. Your guide to aneuploidy screening

The effects of PGS/PGT-A on IVF outcomes

Chromosomal Aneuploidy

Hold On To Your Dreams

PGS Embryo Screening

The Impact of ESHRE 2017 on Japanese Fertility Practice

Targeted qpcr. Debate on PGS Technology: Targeted vs. Whole genome approach. Discolsure Stake shareholder of GENETYX S.R.L

Trends in Egg Donation. Vitaly A. Kushnir MD Center for Human Reproduction

New methods for embryo selection: NGS and MitoGrade

Mosaicism in human embryos: Etiology and pregnancy outcome Santi Munné

Blastocentesis: innovation in embryo biopsy

How effective is egg freezing as a preventative treatment for young women in securing their ability to reproduce later in life?

New perspectives on embryo biopsy, not how, but when and why PGS

Preimplantation Genetic Testing

CHR VOICE the. B ackground. Munné's Response Memorandum. The Center for Human Reproduction. monthly CHR UPDATE. November 2017

PGS & PGD. Preimplantation Genetic Screening Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

INDICATIONS OF IVF/ICSI

Comprehensive chromosome screening and embryo biopsy: advantages and difficulties. Antonio Capalbo, PhD Italy

Scientifically advanced. Personally accessible.

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center


INSIDE IVF: HOW SCIENCE CARES FOR PATIENTS DR DEIRDRE ZANDER-FOX MONASH IVF GROUP HDA GRAND ROUND OCTOBER 31 ST 2018

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: polar body and embryo biopsy

Vitaly A. Kushnir MD, FACOG

Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study

Problem Challenge Need. Solution Innovation Invention

Polar Body Approach to PGD. Anver KULIEV. Reproductive Genetics Institute

Diagnosis of parental balanced reciprocal translocations by trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive chromosomal screening

Effect of race and ethnicity on utilization and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology in the USA

Incidence of Chromosomal Abnormalities from a Morphologically Normal Cohort of Embryos in Poor- Prognosis Patients

Disclosure. Dagan Wells University of Oxford Oxford, United Kingdom

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Preimplantation genetic screening: a reappraisal Mastenbroek, S. Link to publication

Vitaly A. Kushnir MD, FACOG

Number of oocytes and live births in IVF

SNP array-based analyses of unbalanced embryos as a reference to distinguish between balanced translocation carrier and normal blastocysts

An Update on PGD: Where we are today

Same Day, Cost-Effective Aneuploidy Detection with Agilent Oligonucleotide array CGH and MDA Single Cell Amplification Method

USA: Livingston, NJ. PGD for infertility. Europe: Barcelona, Spain Oxford, UK Hamburg, Germany. Asia: Kobe, Japan. South America: Lima, Peru

Fertility 101. About SCRC. A Primary Care Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Infertility. Definition of Infertility. Dr.

Application of OMICS technologies on Gamete and Embryo Selection

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) Fresh and Frozen Embryos Process, Risk, and Consent

A Stepwise Approach to Embryo Selection and Implantation Success

Thrombosis during assisted reproduction. Scott Nelson Muirhead Chair in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Diagnostic Techniques to Improve the Assessment of Human IVF Embryos: Genomics and Proteomics

Understanding IVF Processes in Surrogacy

IN VITRO FERTILIZATION: FROM REPRODUCTION TO GENETIC REPAIR A CAUTIONARY TALE PRESENTED BY: C. MATTHEW PETERSON, MD

Are all-freeze cycles & frozen-thawed embryo transfers improving IVF outcomes?

Non-invasive methods of embryo selection

Original Policy Date

CHR VOICE the. Upcoming changes at CHR for the new academic year 2017/2018. The Center for Human Reproduction. monthly CHR UPDATE.

Explaining the Purpose of PGT-A. Nathan R. Treff PhD, HCLD(ABB) Chief Science Officer Clinical Laboratory Director

Preimplantation Genetic Testing Where are we going? Genomics Clinical Medicine Symposium Sept 29,2012 Jason Flanagan, MS,CGC

Influence ovarian stimulation on oocyte and embryo quality. Prof.Dr. Bart CJM Fauser

Effect of ovarian stimulation on oocyte quality and embryonic aneuploidy: a prospective, randomised controlled trial

Scientific and Clinical Advances Advisory Committee Paper

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

The intra-follicular molecular biology mandating advancement of egg retrieval in some women

With low ovarian reserve, Highly Individualized Egg Retrieval (HIER) improves IVF results by avoiding premature luteinization

Medical Policy Preimplantation Genetic Testing

@ CIC Edizioni Internazionali. Origin and mechanisms of aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos

The ASRM Committee Opinion on PGT for Aneuploidy Our Conclusions and How We Drew Them. Alan Penzias, MD

Dr Guy Gudex. Director Repromed. 17:00-17:30 Recent Advances in Fertility Management

CIC Edizioni Internazionali. Preimplantation genetic screening: definition, role in IVF, evolution and future perspectives. Summary.

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

New Innovations and Technologies:

Do it Once, Do it Right

Development of new comprehensive

Validation of Next-Generation Sequencer for 24-Chromosome Aneuploidy Screening in Human Embryos

Progesterone and clinical outcomes

Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF

1 PGS (PGS) IVF PGS, PGS,, PGS 2, PGS : (PGS); PGS; ; : R321.1 : A : X(2015) PGS 1995, 1 , (ART)

MALBAC Technology and Its Application in Non-invasive Chromosome Screening (NICS)

Blastocyst Morphology Holds Clues Concerning The Chromosomal Status of The Embryo

Differences in chromosome abnormalities in eggs and embryos between fertility centers Santi Munné

CHR VOICE the. GrandRounds. CHR s Fall Travel Plans. The Center for Human Reproduction LOCAL NEWS. Also in this issue: monthly CHR UPDATE OCTOBER 2014

Supplementary Appendix

Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage

A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval

CENTER FOR HUMAN REPRODUCTION - CHR 21 East 69 th Street, New York, N.Y., Telephone: ; Fax:

Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Obs. & Gyn. First Indian to receive FIGO s Distinguished Merit Award for Services towards women s health.

How to make the best use of the natural cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer?

Dr Guy Gudex. Gynaecologist and Fertility Specialist Repromed. 9:05-9:30 Advances in Assisted Reproduction What s New?

Article Impact of meiotic and mitotic non-disjunction on generation of human embryonic stem cell lines

Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Transcription:

Nothing more controversial than PGS Norbert Gleicher, MD M e d i c a l D i r e c t o r a n d C h i e f S c i e n t i s t, C e n t e r F o r H u m a n R e p ro d u c t i o n, N e w Yo r k, N Y P r e s i d e n t, F o u n d a t i o n F o r R e p ro d u c t i v e M e d i c i n e, N e w Yo r k, N Y G u e s t I n v e s t i g at o r, R o c ke fe l l e r U n i v e rs i t y, N e w Yo r k, N Y P r o fe s s o r ( A d j ), D e p a r t m e n t O f O b s t e t r i c s & G y n e c o l o g y, V i e n n a U n i v e rs i t y S c h o o l O f M e d i c i n e, V i e n n a, A u s t r i a Ovarian Club IX September 15-16, 2017 Barcelona, Spain

Conflict Statement Dr. Gleicher is listed as co-inventor on a number of pending patent applications claiming diagnostic and therapeutic benefits from determination of CGG repeat numbers and ovarian FMR1 genotypes and sub-genotypes. Dr. Gleicher is co-inventor of awarded U.S. patents, claiming therapeutic benefits for supplementation of DHEA in women with diminished ovarian reserve, a topic discussed in this talk. Other patent applications in regards to DHEA and other fertility-related claims, with no relationship to this talk, are pending. Dr. Gleicher receives royalties from, and owns shares in Fertility Neutraceuticals, LLC, a distributor of a DHEA product. Dr. Gleicher is co-inventor of three pending patent applications claiming potential therapeutic benefit for anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) in infertile women. Dr. Gleicher owns shares in OvaNova Laboratories, LLC.

The PGS Hypothesis Aneuploidy is a major cause of IVF failure and miscarriages after IVF Elimination of aneuploid embryo before embryo transfer, therefore, will improve IVF outcomes and reduce miscarriages

History Polar body biopsy (Verlinsky et al 1990s) PGS 1.0 (~2000-2008) PGS 2.0 (2008-2017) PGS 3.0/PGT-A (as of July 2017)

History cont. PBB, PGS 1.0 and PGS 2.0, all, reported results as euploid/aneuploidy Only PGS 3.0/PGT-A reports results as euploid/mosaic/aneuploid

Implementation of the most recent PGS technologies has been shown to improve pregnancy rates per transfer in randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis and casecontrolled prospective studies. Besser and Mounts 2017

The errors in IVF outcome assessments with reference embryo transfer n=10 PGS Blastocysts Selection by OR General population (n=100) Assuming 8 live births, the live birth rate will be 80% with reference ET, but only 8% with reference cycle start ( intent to treat )

Is there evidence that the PGS hypothesis does not work? 2 models Orvieto R, Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016 Scriven PN, Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2017

Barad DH et al, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017

The Value of PGS

Can a single TEB reliably reflect the whole TE?

P-values for observing no mosaicism, given different hypotheses r and a threshold of 0.05 (dotted line) P-values for observed mosaicism, given different hypotheses r, and varying numbers of abnormal-aneuploidy cells in biopsy Reprod Biol Endocrinol; In press

Effects of Pre-Implantation Chromosome Mosaicism on Embryo Development and Survival

Richard J. Paulson Preimplantation genetic screening: What is the clinical efficiency? Fertil Steril 2017;108:228-230 We must be cognizant of the reality that this type of screening is inherently inefficient and that many normal embryos are discarded The proportion of normal embryos that are discarded...may be as high as 40%

Greco and et al, N Engl J Med 2015;373:2089-90.

Bernabeu et al ESHRE 2016 Mosaic Euploid Age (years) 31.0 30.6 Embryos (n) 54 382 Clinical pregnancies (%) 26.9% 40.2% Clinical miscarriages (%) 7.1% 18.1% Ongoing pregnancies (%)* 25.0% 32.9% * All births normal

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pregnancy outcome potential of mosaic embryos, detected by means of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Genetics laboratories. PATIENT(S): PGS cycles during which either mosaic or euploid embryos were replaced. INTERVENTION(S): Blastocysts were biopsied and processed with the use of NGS, followed by frozen embryo transfer. Trophectoderm (TE) biopsies were classified as mosaic if they had 20%-80% abnormal cells. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation, miscarriage rates, and ongoing implantation rates (OIRs) were compared between euploid and types of mosaic blastocysts. RESULT(S): Complex mosaic embryos had a significantly lower OIR (10%) than aneuploidy mosaic (50%), double aneuploidy mosaic (45%), and segmental mosaic (41%). There was a tendency for mosaics with 40%-80% abnormal cells to have a lower OIR than those with <40% (22% vs. 56%). However, few embryos (n = 34) with a mosaic error in 40%-80% of the TE sample were replaced. There was no difference between monosomic and trisomic mosaics or between entire chromosome mosaicism or segmental mosaicism. Implantation rates were significantly higher (70% vs. 53%), miscarriage rates lower (10% vs. 25%), and OIRs higher (63% vs. 40%) after euploid embryo transfer than after mosaic embryo transfer. CONCLUSION(S): Forty-one percent of mosaic embryos produced an ongoing implantation. Complex mosaic blastocysts had a lower OIR than other mosaics. Mosaic monosomies performed as well as mosaic trisomies and mosaic segmental aneuploidies. The results suggest that embryos with >40% abnormal cells and those with multiple mosaic abnormalities (chaotic mosaics) are likely to have lower OIRs and should be given low transfer priority.

2016 PGDIS Guidelines

Hypothesis Like cancer cells, blastomeres of early stage embryos show Increased expression of gene products favoring cell progression While lacking cell cycle checkpoint genes Such a constellation favors genetic instability and mitotic errors in cancer and embryos Embryo aneuploidy was believed to be mostly meiotic; now known to be mostly mitotic Kort et al, Hum Reprod 2016 Ghevaria et al, RBMOnline 2016

Hypothesis

Hypothesis cont. Counterintuitively to the PGS hypothesis, aneuploidy in trophectoderm may play a role in invasiveness of the embryo during implantation Supported by excellent live birth rates and low miscarriage rates Supported by tolerance-inducing aneuploidy recently reported in cancer

Conclusions PGS biopsy results: Are biologically nonsensical Are technically unfeasible Are unvalidated Produce large numbers of false-positive diagnoses and, therefore, have resulted in disposal of large numbers of normal embryos Fail to improve IVF outcomes Negatively affect IVF outcomes in at least selected patient populations

CHR Staff (* Visiting Scientists) David F Albertini, PhD David H Barad, MS, MD Ali Brivanlou, PhD, MD* Sarah Darmon, PhD, MS Dieter Egli, PhD* Norbert Gleicher, MD Vitaly A Kushnir, MD Emanuela Lazzaroni-Tealdi, MS Kenneth Seier, MS* Aya Shohat-Tal, PhD* Andrea Vidali, MD* Andrea Weghofer, PhD, MS, MBA, MD* Ping Zhou, PhD Yan-Guang Wu, PhD* Yao Yu, PhD* Affiliates Rockefeller University: Ali Brivanlou, PhD, MD Gist Croft, PhD Salk Institute for Biological Studies: Pradeep Reddy, PhD