Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes-the CORALL study Simsek, S.; Schalkwijk, C. G.; Wolffenbutel, B.H.

Similar documents
Cardiovascular Event Reduction Versus New-Onset Diabetes During Atorvastatin Therapy

Influences of Statins on Glucose Tolerance in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

APPENDIX B: LIST OF THE SELECTED SECONDARY STUDIES

The All Wales Medicine Strategy Group (AWMSG) is asked to support implementation of the following prescribing indicators.

Comparison of Original and Generic Atorvastatin for the Treatment of Moderate Dyslipidemic Patients

Statins and New Onset Diabetes Mellitus NPO

Statins in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

The role of statins in patients with arterial hypertension

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

Statins and glycaemic control in individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Statin Therapy in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus; How Relevant?

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention in high risk patients with or without LDL cholesterol elevation

Changing lipid-lowering guidelines: whom to treat and how low to go

Cardiovascular outcomes trials with statins in diabetes

Female, years or younger BMI of 30 or less at time of Diabetes diagnosis Prefer no family history of diabetes Took Lipitor consistently for at

Quality of prescribing in chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes Smits, Kirsten Petronella Juliana

The Atherogenic Dyslipidemia of Diabetes Mellitus- Not just a question of LDL-C

Diabetes mellitus type 2 and angina pectoris : novel insights in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment Wiersma, J.J.

Statins and diabetes risk: Fact, fiction, and clinical implications

Statins in the elderly : Is there a rationale?

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

Potential synergy between lipid-lowering and blood-pressure-lowering in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial

University of Groningen. Gestational diabetes mellitus: diagnosis and outcome Koning, Saakje Hillie

Low HDL C and/or elevated triglycerides (TG) was seen in nearly two thirds of MI patients

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

Predictors of New-Onset Diabetes in Patients Treated With Atorvastatin

Supplementary appendix

Statins and newly diagnosed diabetes

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

ARIC Manuscript Proposal #2426. PC Reviewed: 9/9/14 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

Comparison of effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia

Ten Year Risk for CVD Event by Systolic HTN and CVD Risk Factors (Where s Age?)

Risk of Diabetes in Patients Treated with HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Control of Hypercholesterolaemia and Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy

Supplementary Online Content

Link between effectiveness and cost data The effectiveness and cost data came from the same sample of patients and were prospectively evaluated.

Traitements associés chez l hypertendu: Statines, Aspirine

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Goals for Today s Session Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to return to their practices with ideas to improve adherence

Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treating to target and meeting new European goals

Phil. J. Internal Medicine, 47: , Nov.-Dec., 2009 STATINS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS

Statin Treatment for Older Adults: The Impact of the 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guidelines

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Data Alert. Vascular Biology Working Group. Blunting the atherosclerotic process in patients with coronary artery disease.

Approach to Dyslipidemia among diabetic patients

Primary prevention with statins and incident diabetes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk *

An example of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ischemic Heart and Cerebrovascular Disease. Harold E. Lebovitz, MD, FACE Kathmandu November 2010

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Cardiovascular Risk Factors

University of Groningen. BNP and NT-proBNP in heart failure Hogenhuis, Jochem

( Diabetes mellitus, DM ) ( Hyperlipidemia ) ( Cardiovascular disease, CVD )

Statins reduce the incidence of coronary events in patients

University of Groningen. Real-world influenza vaccine effectiveness Darvishian, Maryam

Clinical applications of positron emission tomography in coronary atherosclerosis Siebelink, Hans-Marc José

Supplementary Online Content

Effect of atorvastatin on glycaemia progression in patients with diabetes: an analysis from the Collaborative Atorvastatin in Diabetes Trial (CARDS).

University of Groningen. Diuretic response and renal function in heart failure ter Maaten, Jozine Magdalena

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects Kusumanto, Yoka Hadiani

University of Groningen. Diminished ovarian reserve and adverse reproductive outcomes de Carvalho Honorato, Talita

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

B. Patient has not reached the percentage reduction goal with statin therapy

University of Groningen. Metabolic risk in people with psychotic disorders Bruins, Jojanneke

Scientific conclusions

Evaluation of C-reactive protein prior to and on-treatment as a predictor of benefit

Statins ARE Enough For The Prevention of CVD! Professor Kausik Ray Imperial College London, UK

Citation for published version (APA): Weert, E. V. (2007). Cancer rehabilitation: effects and mechanisms s.n.

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

The role of the general practitioner in the care for patients with colorectal cancer Brandenbarg, Daan

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Diabetes is the most common endocrine

When it comes to the FIELD study, what is...is

Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan 2

Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan 2

Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from participants in 14 randomised trials of statins

Statins, Risk of Diabetes, and Implications on Outcomes in the General Population

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

Hypercholesterolemia and hypertension are major

University of Groningen. Diabetes mellitus and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment Fokkens, Bernardina Teunisje

Is there a mechanism of interaction between hypertension and dyslipidaemia?

JAMA. 2011;305(24): Nora A. Kalagi, MSc

Should beta blockers remain first-line drugs for hypertension?

University of Groningen. Medication use for acute coronary syndrome in Vietnam Nguyen, Thang

University of Groningen. Metabolic risk in people with psychotic disorders Bruins, Jojanneke

CLINICAL DECISION USING AN ARTICLE ABOUT TREATMENT JOSEFINA S. ISIDRO LAPENA MD, MFM, FPAFP PROFESSOR, UPCM

Cardiovascular Complications of Diabetes

Statin Therapy and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

University of Groningen. Leven na een beroerte Loor, Henriëtte Ina

Effects of High-Dose Atorvastatin on Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease in the TNT (Treating to New Targets) Study

Ezetimibe and SimvastatiN in Hypercholesterolemia EnhANces AtherosClerosis REgression (ENHANCE)

BEST PRACTICE MANAGEMENT: CARDIOVASCULAR RISKS

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Adult Certified Nurse Practitioner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks!

University of Groningen. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Sheedfar, Fareeba

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Statins use is associated with poorer glycaemic control in a cohort of hypertensive patients with diabetes and without diabetes

This is a lipid lowering drug strategy which should only be used within an overall lifestyle and clinical management strategy.

Transcription:

University of Groningen Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes-the CORALL study Simsek, S.; Schalkwijk, C. G.; Wolffenbutel, B.H. Published in: Diabetic Medicine DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03553.x IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2012 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Simsek, S., Schalkwijk, C. G., & Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R. (2012). Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes-the CORALL study. Diabetic Medicine, 29(5), 628-631. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03553.x Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 20-08-2018

DIABETICMedicine Short Report: Treatment Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes the CORALL study S. Simsek 1, C. G. Schalkwijk 2 and B. H. R. Wolffenbuttel 3 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03553.x 1 Department of Internal Medicine Diabetes Centre, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, 2 Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht and 3 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands Accepted 6 December 2011 Abstract Aims To examine whether high-dose statin therapy in Dutch European patients with Type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia influenced variables of glycaemic control. Methods The CORALL study, which was a 24-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIIb, multi-centre study, was designed to compare the cholesterol-lowering effects ofrosuvastatin comparedwithatorvastatin inpatientswith Type 2 diabetes. Fasting plasma glucose levels and HbA 1c levels were collected at baseline and at 6 and 18 weeks. Results Treatment with the highest dose of statins, i.e. atorvastatin 80 mg and rosuvastatin 40 mg at 18 weeks from baseline, was associated with increase in HbA 1c levels; baseline 57 11 mmol l(7.41.0%) to 61 14 mmol mol (7.7 1.3%) (range 5.0 11.9) for atorvastatin (P = 0.003) and from baseline 60 11 mmol mol (7.6 1.0%) to 63 13 mmol mol (7.9 1.2%) (range 5.7 12.3) for rosuvastatin (P < 0.001). Mean fasting plasma glucose increased from baseline 8.7 2.4 mmol l to 9.5 3.0 mmol l upon treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg (P = 0.002) and 9.0 3.0 mmol l after treatment with 80 mg (not significant compared with baseline). The mean fasting plasma glucose did not change after treatment with rosuvastatin (9.1 2.7 mmol l at baseline, 8.9 2.7 mmol l with 10 mg, 9.4 2.9 mmol lwith40mg). Conclusions Glycaemic control deteriorated in patients with diabetes following high-dose statin therapy. Future controlled studies are needed to verify these findings and, if confirmed, determine whether such changes represent a true decline in glycaemic control. Presently, it appears that, based on the overwhelming prospective trial data available, the preventive effect of statin therapy supersedes that of the slight increase in HbA 1c. Diabet. Med. 29, 628 631 (2012) Keywords advanced glycation end products, diabetes mellitus, HbA 1c, statins Introduction 3-Hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) protect against cardiovascular disorders such as coronary heart disease and ischaemic cerebrovascular disease. Several large-scale studies have reported that high-risk patients, for example those with existing cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes mellitus, show a considerable clinical benefit from statin treatment, and clinical guidelines recommend prescription of statins in such patients irrespective of baseline Correspondence to: Dr S. Simsek, Department of Internal Medicine Diabetes Centre, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, PO Box 501, 1800 AM, Wilhelminalaan 12, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. E-mail: s.simsek@mca.nl serum cholesterol levels [1 4]. Statins have an acceptable safety and tolerability profile [5]. However, recently a well-conducted meta-analysis of randomized trials reported a 9% higher risk of development of diabetes in statin users compared with placebo (odds ratio 1.09; 95% CI 1.02 1.17) [6]. Furthermore, in a recently published pooled analysis of data from five statin trials, highdose statin therapy was associated with a 12% more risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose statin therapy [7]. High-dose atorvastatin treatment compared with placebo in the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial was even associated with a 44% increased risk of new-onset diabetes [8]. Deterioration of glycaemic control has been observed after initiation of atorvastatin therapy in patients with Type 2 628 Diabetic Medicine ª 2011 Diabetes UK

Original article DIABETICMedicine diabetes mellitus in Japan [9,10]. In a retrospective study, Takano et al. compared the effect of atorvastatin and pravastatin on glycaemic control in people with diabetes [9]. HbA 1c increased from 51 10 mmol mol (6.8 0.9%) to 55 12 mmol mol (7.2 1.1%) (P < 0.001) only in the atorvastatin group after 3 months of treatment. Somewhat similar findings have been observed in a prospective study in people with diabetes as well as those without diabetes [12,13]. One of the mechanisms for the detrimental effects of statins on glucose metabolism, at least of atorvastatin, could be the decreased expression of insulin-sensitive solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 4 (SLC2A4, formerly known as GLUT4) [10]. As part of the CORALL study [14], we examined whether 18 weeks of high-dose statin therapy in Dutch European patients with Type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia influenced variables of glycaemic control. Research design and methods The CORALL study was a 24-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIIb, multi-centre study. The first 6 weeks of the study was a dietary lead-in period, after the patients who fulfilled all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. The study was designed to compare the cholesterol-lowering effects of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Subjects were evaluated for efficacy on an intentionto-treat analysis, which contained all randomized subjects with known baseline data. A detailed description of the CORALL study has been previously reported [14]. Four hundred and sixteen subjects with dyslipidaemia and Type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled in the study; of those, 263 patients fulfilled the entry criteria and were randomized to either rosuvastatin (n = 131) or atorvastatin (n = 132). The patients were treated with either rosuvastatin 10 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks, followed by force titration to rosuvastatin 20 mg (if initially on rosuvastatin 10 mg) or atorvastatin 40 mg (if initially on atorvastatin 20 mg) for 6 weeks and, finally, for another 6 weeks, the patients were treated with rosuvastatin 40 mg (if initially on rosuvastatin 20 mg) or atorvastatin 80 mg (if initially on atorvastatin 40 mg). Fasting plasma glucose and HbA 1c levels were collected at baseline and at 6 and 18 weeks. HbA 1c was measured in a central laboratory by high-performance liquid chromatography (Bio-Rad Variant II Automated Glycosylated Hemoglobin Analyzer; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hemel Hempstead, UK) with a normal range 26 44 mmol mol (4.5 6.2%). Plasma glucose levels were analysed by the hospitals central laboratories, with normal reference range as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and plasma glucose measured by the hexokinase method. Statistical analysis spss version 16.0 (spss Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Data are given as mean sd. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out with the paired results obtained at baseline and at 6 weeks and 18 weeks after initiation of rosuvastatin or atorvastatin medication using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test and repeated measures analysis of variance (anova). P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Table 1 depicts the baseline characteristics, with typical age, BMI and blood pressure distribution for this population. No significant change in body weight was observed during the study (data not shown). The percentage of patients reaching target LDL cholesterol values of < 2.5 mmol L (European Atherosclerosis Society guideline) was 77.7, 83.1 and 90.0% with rosuvastatin after 6 weeks (10 mg), 12 weeks (20 mg) and 18 weeks (40 mg), respectively, whereas this goal was reached by 70.5, Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients Demographic characteristics Rosuvastatin n = 131 Atorvastatin n = 132 Total n = 263 Gender (men women) 59 72 63 69 122 141 Age (years) 61 9 59 10 60 10 BMI (kg m 2 ) 31.8 6.1 31.0 6.0 31.4 6.1 Systolic blood pressure (mmhg) 145 20 148 17 147 19 Diastolic blood pressure (mmhg 82 8 83 8 83 8 HbA 1c (mmol mol) (%) 60 11 7.6 1.0 57 11 7.4 1.0 58 11 7.5 1.0 Mean fasting plasma glucose (mmol l) 9.1 2.7 8.7 2.4 8.9 2.6 Diet only 3 (2) 2 (2) 5 (2) Oral blood glucose-lowering agents 40 (31) 47 (35) 87 (33) Insulin 88 (67) 83 (63) 171 (65) Hypertension 79 (60) 86 (65) 165 (63) Baseline data are mean sd or absolute number (%). There were no significant differences between both treatment groups. Diabetic Medicine ª 2011 Diabetes UK 629

DIABETICMedicine Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes S. Simsek et al. 76.5 and 78.0% with atorvastatin after 6 weeks (20 mg), 12 weeks (40 mg) and 16 weeks (80 mg), respectively. Six weeks treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg did not change the HbA 1c levels significantly [HbA 1c levels of 58 12 mmol mol (7.5 1.1%) in both treatment groups) as compared with baseline [HbA 1c 60 11 mmol mol (7.6 1.0%) for rosuvastatin and 57 11 mmol mol (7.4 1.0%) for atorvastatin, respectively] (Fig. 1). However, treatment with the highest dose of statins, i.e. atorvastatin 80 mg and rosuvastatin 40 mg at 18 weeks from baseline was associated with statistically significant increase in HbA 1c levels: 61 14 mmol mol (7.7 1.3%) [range 31 107 mmol mol (5.0 11.9%)] for atorvastatin (P = 0.003) and 63 13 mmol mol (7.9 1.2%) [range 39 111 mmol mol (5.7 12.3%)] for rosuvastatin (P < 0.001), respectively, as compared with baseline (Fig. 1). The change in LDL cholesterol and HbA 1c were not related. Mean fasting plasma glucose increased from baseline 8.7 2.4to9.5 3.0 mmol l upon treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg (P = 0.002) and 9.0 3.0 mmol l after treatment with 80 mg atorvastatin (not significant compared with baseline). The mean fasting plasma glucose did not change significantly after treatment with rosuvastatin (9.1 2.7 mmol l at baseline, 8.9 2.7 mmol l with rosuvastatin 10 mg, 9.4 2.9 mmol l with rosuvastatin 40 mg). Discussion Among Dutch Caucasian patients with dyslipidaemia and Type 2 diabetes, we found that (high-dose) statin therapy leads to a small but significant increase of HbA 1c levels. Caucasian patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus have been included in many statin studies, but the effect of statin therapy on glycaemic control has only been scarcely reported. In the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) the patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with atorvastatin 10 mg over 4 years had a mean HbA 1c of 67 mmol mol (8.3%) [at baseline 63 15 mmol mol (7.87 1.42%)] and the patients on placebo had a mean of 65 mmol mol (8.1%) [at baseline 62 15 mmol mol (7.81 1.39%)] [1]. These results should be interpreted with care, because the glycaemic control variables refers to only those patients who reached the 4-year point. This might either under- or overstate any effect of atorvastatin on glycaemic control. Although the initial dose of atorvastatin therapy was higher in our study (20 mg), no change in HbA 1c levels as compared with baseline was observed. It may be that the relatively short time course (6 weeks) of initial atorvastatin therapy was the reason for the difference with CARDS, although it cannot be excluded that there are dose response effects. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, phase IIIb, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin (10 mg and 20 mg) and atorvastatin (10 mg and 20 mg) in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (ANDROMEDA) study, the mean HbA 1c increased from 52 mmol mol (6.9%) at baseline to 56 mmol mol (7.3%) at week 16 with rosuvastatin 20 mg day, and from 53 mmol mol (7.0%) at baseline to 56 mmol mol(7.3%)atweek16 with atorvastatin 20 mg day [13]. The difference with our study is that, in ANDROMEDA, the statin therapy was given at a fixed dose during a fixed time course. In the Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega-3 EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes (AFORRD) study, an increase in HbA 1c of 1.5 mmol mol (0.3%) (P < 0.0001) after atorvastatin (20 mg day) intervention, but no significant change in the Omega-3EE90(2g day) intervention after 4 months [14]. There are a few limitations to this study that need to be addressed. The most important limitations are that we did not have a placebo-control arm and the relatively short duration of this study. Furthermore, this study was not powered to find a difference in the glycaemic control. In addition, it may be questioned whether the HbA 1c increase is a real consequence of worsening of glycaemic control, as neither CARDS nor ANDROMEDA reported an increase in dose of blood glucoselowering agents, which may be the case when doctors or participating patients witness an increase in blood glucose levels. In conclusion, this short-term study of intensive statin therapy in patients with diabetes suggests a small but significant increase of HbA 1c in statin recipients. Future controlled studies are needed to verify these findings and, if confirmed, determine whether such changes represent a true decline in glycaemic control, or some other mechanism perhaps linked to reduced oxidative potential. Furthermore, whether this change remains in the longer term, and has long-term implications, needs to be studied before making any judgment on clinical relevance of these observations. Presently, it appears that, based on the overwhelming prospective trial data available, the preventive effect of statin therapy supersedes that of the slight increase in HbA 1c. FIGURE 1 Time course changes in HbA 1c levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes administered with atorvastatin (h) or rosuvastatin (j); 6 weeks atorvastatin 20 mg and rosuvastatin 10 mg; 18 weeks atorvastatin 80 mg and rosuvastatin 40 mg. Competing interests BHRW was principal investigator of the CORALL study, which has been financially supported by Astra Zeneca. The 630 Diabetic Medicine ª 2011 Diabetes UK

Original article DIABETICMedicine authors of this paper independently analysed the data and wrote the entire manuscript. The sponsor has reviewed the study manuscript, but the review had no influence on the contents of the manuscript or its conclusions. The principal investigator fully controlled the decision to submit for publication. Acknowledgement The authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Naveed Sattar for critical reading of the manuscript. References 1 Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, Livingstone SJ et al., the CARDS Investigators. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 685 696. 2 Shepherd J, Barter P, Carmena R, Deedwania P, Fruchart JC, Haffner S et al., for the Treating to New Targets Investigators. Effect of lowering LDL cholesterol substantially below currently recommended levels in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes: the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1220 1226. 3 Sever PS, Poulter NR, Dahlöf B, Wedel H, Collins R, Beevers G et al., the ASCOT Investigators. Reduction in cardiovascular events with atorvastatin in 2532 patients with type 2 diabetes: Anglo- Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA). Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1151 1157. 4 Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) Collaborators, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R, Keech A, Simes J, Peto R et al.. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18 686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis, Lancet 2008; 371: 117 125. 5 Armitage J. The safety of statins in clinical practice. Lancet 2007; 370: 1781 1790. 6 Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, de Craen AJ et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet 2010; 375: 735 742. 7 Preiss D, Seshasai SR, Welsh P, Murphy SA, Ho JE, Waters DD et al. Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2011; 305: 2556 2564. 8 Waters DD, Ho JE, DeMicco DA, Breazna A, Arsenault BJ, Wun CC et al. Predictors of new-onset diabetes in patients treated with atorvastatin: results from 3 large randomized clinical trials. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 1535 1545. 9 Takano T, Yamakawa T, Takahashi M, Kimura M, Okamura A. Influences of statins on glucose tolerance in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Atheroscler Thromb 2006; 13: 95 100. 10 Nakata M, Nagasaka S, Kusaka I, Matsuoka H, Ishibashi S, Yada T. Effects of statins on the adipocyte maturation and expression of glucose transporter 4 (SLC2A4): implications in glycaemic control. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 1881 1892. 11 Ishikawa M, Namiki A, Kubota T, Yajima S, Fukazawa M, Moroi M et al. Effect of pravastatin and atorvastatin on glucose metabolism in non-diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia. Intern Med 2006; 45: 51 55. 12 Wolffenbuttel BHR, Franken AAM, Vincent HH. Cholesterollowering effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes CORALL study. J Intern Med 2005; 257: 531 539. 13 Betteridge DJ, Gibson JM. Effects of rosuvastatin on lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in the dyslipidaemia of diabetes. Diabet Med 2007; 24: 541 549. 14 Holman RR, Paul S, Farmer A, Tucker L, Stratton IM, Neil HA; Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega-3 EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes Study Group. Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega-3 EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes (AFORRD): a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2009; 52: 50 59. Diabetic Medicine ª 2011 Diabetes UK 631