Role and impact of orthogeriatric service in the hip fracture care pathway: 15-year experience

Similar documents
Dr Ben Edwards Consultant Anaesthetist Sheffield Teaching Hospitals

Effect of Ortho-Geriatric Co-Management on Hip Fractures

Geriatric Hip Fracture Co-Management. Pannida Wattanapanom, M.D., FACP.

Aged Care and Health Services Research. A/Prof Kwang Lim Sep 2016

Audit of perioperative management of patients with fracture neck of femur

Clinical Care Team approach to management of key conditions

The Geriatrician in the Trauma Service. Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Annual Scientific Meeting and Training 2013

Hip Fracture (HFR) Measures Document

Rehabilitation - Reducing costs and hospital stay. Dr Elizabeth Aitken Consultant Physician

Predicting Short Term Morbidity following Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

What is the shared care model for the Hip fracture patient The Ortho-geriatric Model of Care at St Vincent s Public Hospital Our team and how we make

Introduction. Peripheral arterial disease. Hospital inpatient data - 5,498 FCE (2009/10), & 530 deaths in England alone

Komorbiditet og ortopædkirugi - erfaringer og viden. Benn Rønnow Duus, Ledende overlæge, Ortopædkirurgisk afdeling Bispebjerg Hospital

Management of Hip Fractures

Care of older people in surgery (COPS)

UCLA Health System Apr - Jun 2013 (Q2)

EACTS Adult Cardiac Database

Contraindications to time critical surgery; when not to proceed from the perspective of: The Physician A/Prof Peter Morley

DOAC and NOAC are terms for a novel class of directly acting oral anticoagulant drugs including Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Dabigatran.

SUNY Downstate Medical Center/University Hospital Oct - Dec 2013 (Q4)

The in-hospital management of COPD-exacerbation includes three core processes:

Background Information

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Dr Micheal Looney Consultant Anaesthetist Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown. To Delay or Not to Delay Hip Fracture Surgery

SAFE HIP FRACTURES. Dr Karthik Kayan MD FRCP Consultant Physician and Orthogeriatrician Stockport NHS Foundation Trust

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting 경북대의전원내과조용근

The role of the Geriatrician

Fall-related hip fracture in NSW Epidemiology, evidence, practice and the future

Falls Prevention Best Practice

Evolutions in Geriatric Fracture Care Preparing for the Silver Tsunami

Day 1 10:50. Panel Discussions/Group Photo Coffee/Tea Break 11:15-11:30 (Networking) Different types of. Anesthesia. Day 2

Incidence of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Comorbidity or medical history Existing diagnoses between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011 AF management care AF symptoms Tachycardia

Dr Kerry Gunn. Dr Nicola Broadbent. Anaesthesiologist Auckland City Hospital Auckland. Specialist Anaesthetist Auckland City Hospital Auckland

Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring

The Experience in Exeter with. hip fracture care. Data For Change

Følgende dias er fremlagt ved DCS / DTS Fællesmøde 13. januar 2011 og alle rettigheder tilhører foredragsholderen. Gengivelse må kun foretages ved

The Perioperative Care Chain is Only as Strong as its weakest link

Supplement materials:

Cardiovascular Health Practice Guideline Outpatient Management of Coronary Artery Disease 2003

Asif Serajian DO FACC FSCAI

Anaemia impedes functional mobility after hip fracture surgery

CABG in the Post-Aprotinin Era: Are We Doing Better? Ziv Beckerman, David Kadosh, Zvi Peled, Keren Bitton-Worms, Oved Cohen and Gil Bolotin

Complicanze aritmiche in riabilitazione dopo CCH.

L. Fauchier (1), S. Taillandier (1), I. Lagrenade (1), C. Pellegrin (1), L. Gorin (1), A. Bernard (1), B. Rauzy (1), D. Babuty (1), GYL.

Clinical Controversies in Perioperative Medicine

Venous Thromboembolism. Prevention

Yes No Unknown. Major Infection Information

THE WHITE PAPER Associate Professor Peter Lipski

Hip Fracture Orthopaedic Department Patient Information Leaflet

V. Roldán, F. Marín, B. Muiña, E. Jover, C. Muñoz-Esparza, M. Valdés, V. Vicente, GYH. Lip

Diagnostic, Technical and Medical

SCORES FOR 4 TH QUARTER, RD QUARTER, 2014

Perioperative Myocardial Infarction

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Does quality of life predict morbidity or mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)?

Enhanced Perioperative Management of Older Adults

Practitioner Education Course

DVT PROPHYLAXIS IN HOSPITALIZED MEDICAL PATIENTS SAURABH MAJI SR (PULMONARY,MEDICINE)

Major Vascular Anaesthesia where is the challenge. Dr B Brandner Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Management UCLH, London

Occurrence of Bleeding and Thrombosis during Antiplatelet therapy In Non-cardiac surgery. A prospective observational study.

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Shared Care Protocol for the Prescription and Supply of Low Molecular Weight Heparins

Anaesthesia for the Over 75s. Chris Edge

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

FALLS PREVENTION. S H I R L E Y H U A N G, M S c, M D, F R C P C

The Peterborough experience over the years with hip fractures. Martyn Parker Peterborough UK

Measure Applications Partnership. Hospital Workgroup In-Person Meeting Follow- Up Call

MANAGEMENT OF OVERANTICOAGULATION AND PREOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF WARFARIN DOSE 1. GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AN ELEVATED INR

2012 Core Measures. Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)

MSK Rehab Definitions Framework - hip fractures Self assessment Survey Outpatient Rehab

Prevention and Management of Hip Fracture in Older People

Venothromboembolism prophylaxis: Trauma and Orthopaedics Clinical guideline, V2

Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery (MINS): What is it and what can we do to help patients suffering this event? PJ Devereaux, MD, PhD

Managing Hypertension in the Perioperative Arena

Ortho-geriatric Management of the #NOF Patient

Clinical Controversies in Perioperative Medicine

Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass?

IAEM Clinical Guideline 11 Management of Patients with Suspected Hip Fracture in the Emergency Department

Early Ambulation Reduces the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Knee Replacement. Marilyn Szekendi, PhD, RN

Acute Coronary Syndromes: Challenges to Management. Claire Williams November 2017

Appendix E : Evidence table 9 Rehabilitation: Other Key Documents

Implementing a new Orthogeriatric model to improve patient care and outcomes Aiming for Excellence!

How to Address an Inappropriately high Mortality Rate? Joe Sharma, MD Associate Professor of Surgery NSQIP Surgical Champion

PAPERS. proximal femoral fracture. Prognostic factors for the elderly with

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

2O18 ANNUAL REPORT SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT

Geriatric Medicine I) OBJECTIVES

Peri-operative Troponin Measurements - Pathophysiology and Prognosis

Breast cancer in the elderly - is there a role for the geriatrician?

JAMA, January 11, 2012 Vol 307, No. 2

URN: Family name: Given name(s): Address: Initial Signature Print Name Role

My hip fracture care: 12 questions to ask A guide for patients, their families and carers

Prescribe appropriate immunizations for. Prescribe childhood immunization as per. Prescribe influenza vaccinations in high-risk

Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery. Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Objectives. Challenges of Geriatric Fractures. Faith Trial. Overview. Evidence 3/13/2017

These are guidelines only and can be deviated from if it is thought to be in the patient s best interest.

Perso An. Geri-O. Objectives: fragility fracture. AL SUPPORT. presentation.

Outcome of elderly patients with severe but asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Transcription:

Role and impact of orthogeriatric service in the hip fracture care pathway: 15-year experience AA Fisher, MW Davis Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, and Australian National University Medical School, ACT, Australia

Background In developed countries population ageing is associated with a fracture epidemic, particularly hip fracture (HF), and the outcomes are often disappointing. The number of HFs could increase in Australia 1.6-fold by 2021( Fisher et al 2009).

Background Although surgical repair of the fracture is crucial, co-morbidities and perioperative complications are the main factors determining the outcome. In older patients, concomitantly with their hip fracture (HF) generally multiple co-morbid conditions and complicated social problems should be managed, but the involvement and responsibilities of geriatricians in providing care pathway (CP) have not been clarified. The optimal model of orthopaedic-geriatric comanagement is uncertain.

Major postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery 15 10 5 0 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ age (Polanczyk CA et al. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134:637) In-hospital mortality Cardiac complications Noncardiac complications Overall major complications The knowledge base of both surgery and medicine is growing rapidly; no individual practitioner can remain expert in both fields. Although multidisciplinary approach to manage hip fracture (HF) patients is widely accepted and most studies showed that care pathways (CPs) positively affect process management and health resource use, there is still a lot of debate and uncertainty regarding the impact of CPs on clinical outcomes.

Background Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012 Sep 25. [Epub ahead of print] The effect of care pathways for hip fractures: a systematic overview of secondary studies. Leigheb F, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Lodewijckx C, Deneckere S, Boonen S, Boto PA, Mendes RV, Panella M. This recent systematic review concluded that available evidence is insufficient for formal recommendations of CP. CPs as complex interventions designed to optimise clinical outcomes and resource utilization are mainly focused on implementation of standardized protocols based on best available evidence. However, the need of individualisation and the role and contribution of different specialities is often poorly addressed.

Aims To describe a co-managed (between orthopaedic surgeons and geriatricians) model of CP for HF patients with geriatrician-led integration of medical, rehabilitation and social care; To identify the main areas of need for medical intervention in orthogeriatric patients; To highlight the special role(s) of a geriatrician in solving a wide range of diverse peri-operative problems; To analyse the impact of orthogeriatric service on outcomes.

Methods Prospective observational study of more than 3500 older ( 60 years) patients with HF over a 15 year period (1998-2012 ). The database includes socio-demographic, medical, surgical, laboratory and functional data. Presentation and analysis of the full spectrum of elements of perioperative orthogeriatric service as a part of CP in a tertiary university hospital: evaluation of co-morbidities, peri-operative non-surgical needs and complications, risk factors and predictors of poor outcomes; individualized short- and long-term preventive and treatment strategies; integration and coordination of the multidisciplinary team.

Results Proportion (%) of older patients (>60 years) (The Canberra Hospital, 2007) 49.5 41.8 35.5 All adult patients Surgical patients Orthopeadic patients Orthopaedic patients (>60 years): Represent 35.5% of all adult patients, Consume 49.9% of all bed-days, Have multiple pre-fracture chronic diseases (4.6 diagnoses per patient on average).

The orthogeriatric service In our hospital a geriatric HF clinical CP started in 1998. The orthogeriatric service (one full-time geriatrician and registrar) includes: early assessment (often in the emergency department), daily clinical care and optimising medication used, weekly ward rounds shared with the orthopaedic team, nurse, pharmacist, physiotherapist and occupational therapist, coordinated planning of the surgery schedule, post-operative ambulation, time and destination of patient discharge.

The Model for Combined Orthogeriatric Management of Older Adults With Hip Fracture at The Canberra Hospital Older patient with hip fracture Emergency Department Unstable, severe acute problems Medical geriatric advice (routinely or on request) Stable Admission to Coronary Care Unit, ICU or Acute Care of the Elderly Unit Admission to orthopaedic ward Pre-operative geriatric and anaesthetist evaluation

SURGERY Unstable Stable Admission to ICU or CCU Stable Return to Orthopaedic ward Geriatric daily management Medical problems Complications Functionally oriented rehabilitation Social problems Discharge planning Home Residential care facilities Discharge Follow-up after discharge Transfer to another hospital for rehabilitation Transfer to Geriatric ward Assessment in Falls Clinic Domiciliary nursing and/ or social service (e.g meals on wheels) Domiciliary occupational and physiotherapy

Pre-operative care issues Preparing and optimising elderly patients for early surgery (door-totheatre time 24-48 hours), Adequate analgesia, Maintenance of good hydration but avoiding fluid overload (high rates of congestive cardiac failure in this population!), Identifying comorbidities and risk factors for peri-operative complications (e.g., myocardial injury, acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage,etc) and poorer outcomes, Reversal of antithrombotic therapy, withheld of anti-platelet agents and nonsteroidals and proper anticoagulation when indicated (e.g., metallic heart valve), Pressure ulcers prevention, Prophylactic antibiotics and Reducing unnecessary consultations by other medical specialists.

Post-operative care issues Early mobilisation (on the first post-operative day), Prevention and treatment of haemodynamic instability (especially orthostatic and/or postprandial hypotension), Blood transfusion (where appropriate), Maintenance of adequate hydration and nutrition (protein supplements), Further investigation and management of comorbidities (including osteoporosis and causes of falls), Rationalisation of medications (anti-hypertensives, anti-depressants), Adequate anti-osteoporotic therapy (triple: specific anti-osteoporotic agent, vitamin D and calcium supplement), Prophylactic anticoagulation for 6 weeks, Coordination of functionally oriented nursing and paramedical care, Early goal setting and discharge planning and Notification of primary care physicians.

Prevention and treatment of post-operative complications Anaemia Infections Delirium Thromboembolic complications Acute coronary and cerebrovascular events Pulmonary complications (atelectasis, pneumonia, fat embolism) New arrhythmias Hyponatraemia Oliguria Urinary retention Renal failure Constipation Gastrointestinal bleeding Pressure sores

Risk factors (Independent predictors) Although clinical characteristics and incidence of poorer short-term outcomes in patients with cervical and trochanteric HF are similar, the risk factors for certain outcomes are site-specific reflecting differences in underlying mechanisms and indicating the need for an individualized approach (Fisher et al 2012).

Independent risk factors for short-term outcomes in older patients with hip fracture by fracture site. CAD, coronary artery disease; LOS, length of hospital stay; RCF, residential care facility; ctni, cardiac troponin I; CRP, C-reactive protein; (-) negative effect

Risk factors (Independent predictors) For peri-operative myocardial injury (with cardiac troponin rise): in patients with cervical HF: dementia, smoking and renal impairment, in patients with trochanteric HF: coronary heart disease (CAD), hyperparathyroidism (serum PTH >6.8 pmol/l) and hypoleptinaemia (<12ng/ml); For prolonged length of stay (> 20 days): in patients with cervical HF: CAD in patients with trochanteric HF: age >75 years and hyperparathyroidism

Risk factors (Independent predictors) For institutionalisation: in patients with cervical HF: age >75 years, dementia and vitamin D incufficiency(25(oh) D<50nmol/l), in patients with trochanteric HF: age >75 years, dementia and hyperparathyroidism, For in-hospital death: in both groups hyperparathyroidism in patients with cervical HF also male sex and low leptin levels, For acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: in both groups: prefracture use of aspirin, clopidorgel, nonsteroidals, history of peptic ulcer disease and current smoking

Post-operative myocardial injury Elevated cardiac troponin (ctni) and main outcomes in older hip fracture patients (multivariate regression analysis)* ctni (μg/l) Outcome OR 95% CI P value >1.00 In-hospital mortality 15.9 2.6-97.1 0.003 >0.06 Length of stay>20 days 2.2 1.1-4.7 0.046 >0.06 Discharge to long term residential care facility 2.7 1.2-6.1 0.013 *Adjusted for age, sex, history of CAD, stroke, dementia, ASA score 3, current smoking Screening for perioperative myocardial injury Improves outcomes (by minimizing unnecessary delays in surgery and premedication with a beta-blocker) Useful for prognosis

Post-operative oliguria (PO) and short - term outcomes Outcome PO No P value PRESET PO Troponin I rise,% 44.3 27.4 0.018 LOS>20 days, % 32.5 12.6 0.000 In-hospital death, % 6.1 0.8 0.025 Post-operative oliguria is associated with higher incidence of postoperative myocardial injury, prolonged LOS and in-hospital death

Haemodynamic changes and post-operative oliguria (Multivariate regression analysis) Factors Odds Ratio 95% Confidence interval P Value Decrease in SBP 10 mmhg 1.36 1.17-1.57 <0.001 Decrease in DBP 10 mmhg 2.27 1.99-3.56 <0.001 Increase in HR 10 b/min 1.49 1.14-2.67 0.05 - A post operative fall in SBP and DBP for each 10mmHg increases the probability of PO by 36% and 127%, respectively - A rise in heart rate by each 10 beats/min increases the probability of PO by 49%

Predicting post-operative oliguria (Multivariate regression analysis) Factors Odds Ratio 95% Confidence interval P Value Age 1.02 0.99-1.07 0.13 Gender 0.90 0.47-1.73 0.75 Dependent mobility 4.85 2.58-9.12 <0.001 Atrial fibrillation 1.79 0.82-3.85 0.14 ASA class 1.18 0.78-1.79 0.43 Diuretics 1.56 0.81-2.98 0.18 Pre-operative Positive fluid balance(500ml/hr) 2.76 1.32-5.73 0.007 The independent predictors of PO in this model are preoperative positive balance( 500 ml/h) and dependent mobility

Predicting post-operative oliguria by combination of selected clinical characteristics Preoperative positive fluid balance ( 500 ml/24 hrs.) and Odds Ratio 95% Confidence interval P Value ASA class 1.65 1.02-2.69 0.04 Dependent mobility 6.62 3.10-14.13 <0.001 ASA class and mobility 8.31 3.58-19.2 <0.001 The OR for developing PO increases significantly when preoperative positive fluid balance is combined with higher ASA score (OR=1.65), dependent mobility (OR=6.6) or both (OR=8.3)

Sequence of events leading to the development of post-operative oliguria APO Compensatory Heart Rate Organ Hypoperfusion Peripheral Resistance Stroke Volume

Risk factors for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in older hip fracture patients (multivariate analysis) Factor OR (95% CI) P-value History of peptic ulcer 4.3 (1.04-12.83) 0.043 Current smoker 3.1 (1.25-6.42) 0.023 Blood group 0 1.7 (1.01-2.21) 0.046 Aspirin 6.9 (3.25-11.83) 0.001 Aspirin and/or clopidogrel 6.5 (3.24-10.09) 0.001 COX-2 inhibitor 4.9 (1.48-12.19) 0.006 *Adjusted also for age, sex, type of hip fracture and number of comorbid conditions.

Risk factors for permanent institutionalisation post HF repair (Multivariate logistic regression analysis) Factor OR 95% CI P value Dementia 2.9 1.4-3.8 0.001 Elevated troponin (>0.06μg/L g/l) Anaemia (pre-operative Hb <120g/L) 2.7 1.2-6.1 0.013 1.9 1.1-3.3 0.020 Age >75 years 1.8 1.1-3.3 0.046 Trochanteric HF 1.8 1.1-3.1 0.046

Complication prevention In patients with risk factors for myocardial injury: Preventive use of a beta-blocker. In patients with risk factors acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: Preventive use of a proton pump inhibitor (Fisher et al 2007; Fisher et al 2009).

Outcomes Implementation of the integrated CP with comprehensive orthogeriatric service resulted in significant reductions in morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and increases in optimal postoperative care.

In-hospital mortality 8% 7% % 6% 5% 4% 3% 7.7% 4.7% 3.9% 2% 1% 0% 1995-1997 1998-2002 2005-2007 In-hospital mortality of older HF patients significantly decreased after combined orthogeriatric care was introduced.

% Post-operative medical complications Sepsis Delirium Pneumonia DVT/PE GI Bleeding UTI Pressure sores ACS CVA p<0.001 % 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 70% 49.5% 37.90% 1995-1997 1998-2002 2003-2007 Total Incidences (%) of main post-operative medical complications in older patients with hip fracture (*=p<0.05) 15 10 5 0 * * * * * * * * 1996-1998 (n=504) 1999-2002 (n=447) Joint orthogeriatric care resulted in a significant reduction in postoperative medical complications including sepsis, delirium, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, GI bleeding, thromboembolism, pressure sores, acute coronary and cerebrovascular syndromes.

Effect of preventive use of proton pump inhibitors in older patients with hip fracture and risk factors for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (AGIH) Older patients with hip fracture (n=822) RFs for AGIH present, not treated n=134 (16.3%) RFs for AGIH identified and treated n=139 (16.9%) No RFs for AGIH, not treated n=549 (66.8%) AGIH n=18 (13.4%) AGIH n=1 (0.72%) AGIH n=1 (0.18%)

Use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis 100% 80% % 60% 40% 63% 94% 98.70% 20% 0% 1995-1997 1998-2002 2003-2007 The number of patients receiving specific pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin increased significantly.

Use of anti-osteoporotic therapy NS p=0.001 100% % 80% 60% 40% 94% 97% 69% 1995-1997 1998-2002 2004-5 20% 0% 12% 14% 12% On admission On discharge 2003-2007 After establishing the orthogeriatric service anti-osteoporotic treatment for secondary fracture prevention has progressively increased.

Rehospitalisation to medical wards % 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 28.0% 7.0% 5.4% 1995-1997 1998-2002 2003-2007 The rate of rehospitalisation within 6 months after hospital discharge for HF decreased significantly.

Outcomes (summary) In 2011, compared to the period when medical problems were managed only by consultations medical complications decreased by 34.7%, length of hospital stay by 11%, in-hospital mortality by 3%, acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage by 88.8% rehospitalisation (within 6 months) by 21.4%, In 2011: specific thromboprophylaxis received 97% anti-osteoporotic therapy 89%, followed-up in our outpatient clinic 14.6%

Conclusions A comprehensive orthogeriatric service should be viewed as an essential and effective component of an integrated CP for older HF patients. Combined orthogeriatric care raises clinical standards and improves outcomes. Such model recognizes the significant diversity of HF patients, helps to overcome difficulties in providing concomitantly both standardized protocols and individualized therapy and results in better outcomes by reducing major postoperative complication and mortality.

Take home message: A physician in a surgical ward is not a wolf in sheep s clothing and may be helpful in providing optimal perioperative care.

European Care Pathways conference Supporting safe, effective, person centred care, through the use of care pathways Grand Central Hotel, Glasgow 20 th and 21 st June 2013 Follow the conference on twitter at #ecpc13