Outcomes from a 12-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Teduglutide in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome.

Similar documents
Gattex. Gattex (teduglutide) Description

Gattex. Gattex (teduglutide) Description

GATTEX (Teduglutide) for Injection REMS Program: Prescriber Education

Management of Short Bowel Syndrome in the Era of Teduglutide. Charlene Compher, PhD, RD University of Pennsylvania

teduglutide [rdna origin] (Gattex )

SUSTAIN BASELINE DATA COLLECTION FORM. Revised 2/4/2014 (both pediatric and adult data elements) 1. Gestational age at birth ( weeks gestation)

AGENDA. Business highlights Significant progress with late stage clinical programs heading towards filing. Britt Meelby Jensen

INTESTINAL FAILURE, REHABILITATION & TRANSPLANTATION: Indications, Techniques and Outcomes

Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplantation

Developing treatment options for patients with rare gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders and unmet medical need

Nutritional Requirements in Intestinal Failure

Enteral and parenteral nutrition in GI failure and short bowel syndrome

Sustain Follow-up Data Collection Form (Revised 2/4/2014) (both pediatric and adult elements) (Please select) (Please select)

Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in Pediatric Patients With ahus, With or Without Baseline Dialysis

Case Discussion. Nutrition in IBD. Rémy Meier MD. Ulcerative colitis. Crohn s disease

Short Bowel Syndrome: Medical management

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

National & International Lectures

Fistuloclysis (distal limb feeding) Dr Alison Culkin Research Dietitian AuSPEN 2015

Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in Pediatric Patients With ahus, With or Without Baseline Dialysis

Zorbtive. Zorbtive (somatropin) Description

Safety and Efficacy of Teduglutide After 52 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome Intestinal Failure

Total Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition in the Home. Original Policy Date 12:2013

Practical Strategies for the Clinical Use of Incretin Mimetics CME/CE. CME/CE Released: 09/15/2009; Valid for credit through 09/15/2010

Who Needs Parenteral Nutrition? Is Parenteral Nutrition An Appropriate Intervention?

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Parenteral Nutrition. Outline. Potential Biomarkers for Use in Intestinal Adaptation. Jejunum is primary site of digestion and absorption

A Crash Course in Failure to Thrive April 5, Kelly E. Wood, MD Clinical Assistant Professor Stead Family Department of Pediatrics

Improved survival in a multidisciplinary short bowel syndrome program

Definition and Types of Intestinal Failure

Medical Policy. MP Parenteral, Enteral and Oral Nutrition in The Home. Related Policies None

Baseline Forms- Pediatric Data Collection Tools A.S. P. E. N.

Surgery for Intestinal Failure

PRODUCT INFORMATION. REVESTIVE (teduglutide)

Dietetic Outcomes in Home Parenteral Nutrition

BRINCIDOFOVIR WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY TREAT ADENOVIRUS INFECTIONS IN SOLID ORGAN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS AND OTHER IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PATIENTS

GATTEX (teduglutide [rdna origin])

Observations 1251 Variables 207

Follow-up Forms-Pediatric Data Collection Tools A.S.P.E.N.

Original Effective Date: 9/10/09

Morabito A UK. -Royal Manchester Children s Hospital (PABRRU) -Intestinal Failure Unit Salford Royal Hospital

Management of Acute Intestinal Failure. HIFNET and Parenteral Nutrition Keith Gardiner Consultant Colorectal Surgeon Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast

Home Total Parenteral Nutrition for Adults

Pharmacotherapy IV: Liraglutide for Chronic Weight Management SARAH CAWSEY MD, FRCPC 2 ND ANNUAL OBESITY UPDATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2018

Strategies for preventing and treating IFALD

ESPEN Congress Florence 2008

Medical Policy Enteral Nutrition Formulas and Supplements

Medical Policy Enteral Nutrition Formulas and Supplements

Parenteral Nutrition in IBD: Any indication?

LLL Session - Nutritional support in renal disease

Emerging Strategies for the Management of Intestinal Failure

Presenter Disclosure Information

Chapter 34. Nursing Care of Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Disorders

AMR101, a Pure-EPA Omega-3 Fatty Acid, Lowers Triglycerides in Patients with Very High Triglycerides Without Raising LDL- C: The MARINE Study

Nutrition Management in GI Diseases

Do you have myelofibrosis?

IN ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS WITH BRINCIDOFOVIR: FINAL 36 WEEK RESULTS FROM THE ADVISE TRIAL

Dedication...iii Contributors...iv v Reviewers... vi vii Preface... viii x

INSPIRE: A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LIQ861 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

No Other Company Discloses Higher Transplant Survival Rate. Infusions For Emerging Treatments. Date of Use. Recipient Age (yrs)

Chapter 16 Nutrition, Fluids and Electrolytes, and Acid-Base Balance Nutrition Nutrients Water o Functions Promotes metabolic processes Transporter

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

The top 5 things all doctors should know about nutrition. Dr Peter Mooney Consultant Gastroenterologist Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Nutrition Intervention After Gastric Bypass Revision

Division of Acute Care Surgery Clinical Practice Policies, Guidelines, and Algorithms: Enteral Nutrition Algorithm Clinical Practice Guideline

APDW 2016 Poster No. a90312

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

MCT AND THE ROLES NUTRITION

Drug Class Monograph

Short bowel syndrome after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: nutritional considerations

Long-Term Teduglutide for the Treatment of Patients With Intestinal Failure Associated With Short Bowel Syndrome

SHORT GUT SYNDROME (SGS) : A MANAGEMENT CHALLENGE!

WHEN To Initiate Parenteral Nutrition A Frequent Question With New Answers

Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC): 24-month update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study

Drug Class Monograph

Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition in Hemodialysis Patients. Hamdy Amin, Pharm.D., MBA, BCNSP Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Small Bowel Obstruction after operation in a severely malnourished man. By: Ms Bounmark Phoumesy

TPN Discontinuation Post Bowel Resection. Clinical Case Study by: Cody Steiner MSU Dietetic Intern

Issues in Enteral Feeding: Malnutrition

Nutritional Support in the Perioperative Period

Acute management of severe malnutrition. Dr Simon Gabe St Mark s Hospital, London

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TABELECLEUCEL IN PATIENTS WITH EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS-ASSOCIATED LEIOMYOSARCOMAS (EBV + LMS)

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT-2 Inhibitors. Debbie Hicks

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Nutrition in Pancreatic Cancer. Edmond Sung Consultant Gastroenterologist Lead Clinician for Clinical Nutrition and Endoscopy

DISCLOSURE. Learning Objectives. Controversies in Parenteral Nutrition

[No conflicts of interest]

ICU NUTRITION UPDATE : ESPEN GUIDELINES Mirey Karavetian Assistant Professor Zayed University

Effect of macronutrients and mixed meals on incretin hormone secretion and islet cell function

Clinical Guidelines for the Hospitalized Adult Patient with Obesity

SUCRALFATE TABLETS, USP

Current Trends in Home Parenteral Nutrition

Crohn's Disease. What causes Crohn s disease? What are the symptoms?

PRODUCT INFORMATION 1 ABOUT THIS GUIDE DOSAGE FORM AND STRENGTH STORAGE AND HANDLING

Transcription:

Outcomes from a 12-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Teduglutide in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome. Carter BA 1, Cohran VC 2, Cole CR 3, Corkins MR 4, Dimmitt RA 5, Duggan C 6, Hill S 7, Horslen S 8, Lim JD 9, Mercer DF 1, Merritt RJ 11, Nichol PF 12, Sigurdsson L 13, Teitelbaum DH 14, Thompson J 15, Vanderpool C 16, Vaughan JF 17, Li B 18, Youssef NN 19, Venick RS 2, Kocoshis SA 3. J Pediatr. 217 Feb;181:12-111.e5. doi: 1.116/j.jpeds.216.1.27. Epub 216 Nov 15. Trial was supported by NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,* Bedminster, NJ *A wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Shire plc Oral Presentation Oley Foundation Annual Conference, July 5-8, 217, New Greenwich CT, USA Oral Presentation at BSPGHAN 216 Annual Meeting; January 27 29, 216; Bristol, United Kingdom Oral Presentation at the XIV International Small Bowel Transplant Symposium; June 1 13, 215; Buenos Aires, Argentina

DISCLOSURE Beth Carter, MD served as a study investigator and received research support from NPS Pharmaceuticals/ Shire Beth Carter, MD has been a speaker (Webinar) for Thrive Rx Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV Oley International Foundation Small Annual Bowel Conference, Transplant July 5-8, Oral Presentation at BSPGHAN 216 Annual Meeting; January Symposium; 217, New 27 29, June Greenwich 216; 1 13, CT, Bristol, 215; USA United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 2

INTRODUCTION! Children with SBS - Diminished absorptive capacity - May remain parenteral support (PS) dependent for many months with little intestinal adaptation under current standards of care! Teduglutide (GLP-2 analogue) 1-3 Approved for adults with SBS dependent on PS Approved for children with SBS aged > 1 year in the EU Stimulates small bowel growth Mediates intestinal adaptation! Pediatric clinical study - To evaluate whether teduglutide enhances intestinal adaptation in PSdependent children with SBS with no significant advance in enteral nutrition (EN) EN=enteral nutrition (formula taken by mouth and/or tube feeding); GLP-2=glucagon-like peptide 2; PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids); SBS=short bowel syndrome 1. Tappenden KA. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 214;38(suppl 1):23S-31S; 2. GATTEX (teduglutide [rdna origin]). Full Prescribing Information. NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bedminster, NJ. 214; 3. REVESTIVE (teduglutide [rdna origin]). Summary of Product Characteristics. NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bedminster, Oral Presentation Oral NJ, Presentation 214 the XIV at International BSPGHAN 216 Small Annual Bowel Meeting; Transplant January Symposium; 27 29, June 216; 1 13, Bristol, 215; United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina Oral Presentation Oley Foundation Annual Conference, July 5-8, 217, New Greenwich CT, USA, Oral Presentation Oley Foundation Ann,, USA l 3

STUDY DESIGN Screening 2 weeks* Cohort 1:.125 mg/kg/day (n=8) Active teduglutide treatment (12 weeks) 4-week follow-up Screening 2 weeks* Cohort 2:.25 mg/kg/day (n=14) Active teduglutide treatment (12 weeks) 4-week follow-up Screening 2 weeks* Cohort 3:.5 mg/kg/day (n=15) Active teduglutide treatment (12 weeks) 4-week follow-up Screening 2 weeks Observation: standard of care (12 weeks, n=5) 4-week follow-up *Safety data were assessed after 28 days of teduglutide treatment before the next dosing cohort could proceed ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT19528; EudraCT: 213-4588-3 Oral Presentation Oley Foundation Annual Conference, July 5-8, 217, New Greenwich CT, USA Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV at International BSPGHAN 216 Small Annual Bowel Meeting; Transplant January Symposium; 27 29, June 216; 1 13, Bristol, 215; United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 4

METHODS! Aged 1 17 years with SBS for 12 months, on PS for 3% of caloric and/or fluid/electrolyte needs 1% change in PS or advance in EN feeds for 3 months! EN calorie and volume data were based on commercially available liquid feed taken orally/given via tube feeding only Additional solid foods and liquids considered ad lib nutrition and not included in calculation of EN! Statistical analysis Data assessed by descriptive statistics (eg, median, minimum, maximum, number of patients, percentage of patients) EN=enteral nutrition (formula taken by mouth and/or tube feeding); PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids); SBS=short bowel syndrome Oral Presentation Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV International BSPGHAN Oley Foundation 216 Small Annual Bowel Conference, Meeting; Transplant January July Symposium; 5-8, 27 29, 217, New June 216; Greenwich 1 13, Bristol, 215; United CT, USA Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 5

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS 4/42 patients completed the study Standard of Care (n=5).125 (n=8) Teduglutide, mg/kg/day.25 (n=14).5 (n=15) Age, years Median (min, max) 2. (2, 3) 3. (1, 14) 4. (1, 14) 4. (1, 14) Male, n (%) 3 (6) 6 (75) 11 (79) 8 (53) Median BMI, kg/m 2 (min, max) 16.8 (14.3, 18.4) 15.4 (13.8, 19.4) 16.2 (14.8, 18.2) 15.9 (14.3, 18.4) Duration of PS dependency, years Median (min, max) 2.4 (2, 3) 3.6 (1, 12) 4.2 (1, 9) 4. (.5, 12) Stoma, n (%) 1 (13) 1 (7) 1 (7) Colon-in-continuity, n (%)* 5 (1) 7 (1) 12 (86) 14 (1) Median estimated residual small intestine length, cm (min, max) 35 (1, 75) 15 (2, 75) 68 (15, 145) 26 (, 68) Median PS volume at baseline, L/ week (min, max) Median EN volume at baseline, L/ week (min, max) *Percentages based on patients with remaining colon 7.7 (4.4, 9.8) 5.1 (.9, 6.) 5.4 (4.2, 13.9) 8.1 (2.9, 12.6) 8.1 (4.4, 16.) 7. (1.9, 13.4) 5.6 (4., 13.1) 3.4 (.3, 6.3) Oral Oral Presentation Presentation Oral Presentation the BSPGHAN XIV International Oley Foundation 216 Annual Small Annual Bowel Meeting Conference, Transplant ; January July Symposium; 5-8, 27 29, 217, 216; New June Greenwich Bristol, 1 13, England, CT, 215; USA United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 6

DECREASE IN PS VOLUME Median Weekly PS Volume Change From Baseline, % Median Weekly PS Volume, % Change From Baseline 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 Week 16 (4-week follow-up) Prescribed Volume Standard of care.125 mg/kg/day teduglutide.25 mg/kg/day teduglutide.5 mg/kg/day teduglutide 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 16 Standard of care*.125 mg/kg/day.25 mg/kg/day.5 mg/kg/day -8.1-3.6-15.2-12.2-18.8-15.6-23.9-15.6 *n=5 (except n=4 at Week 5); n=8 (except n=6 at Week 11 and n=7 at Weeks 1, 4 1, 12, and 16); n=14 (except n=13 at Week 12); n=15 (except n=14 at Weeks 7, 9 12, and 16) PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids) Data points are median values, and error bars are the min and max values -25.9-13.9-29.7-15.6 1.7-3. -25.4-35.5-25.4 -.8-37.5-25.4 Oral Presentation Oral Presentation Oral the Presentation XIV International BSPGHAN Oley Foundation 216 Small Bowel Annual Meeting; Transplant Conference, January Symposium; July 5-8, 27 29, 217, June 216; New 1 13, Bristol, Greenwich 215; United CT, Buenos USA Kingdom Aires, Argentina -41.1-25.4-1.7-33.6-17.9 7

DECREASE IN PS CALORIES Median Weekly PS Calories Change From Baseline, % 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 Median Weekly PS Calories, % Change From Baseline 2 4 6 8 1 12 Week 16 (4-week follow-up) Prescribed Calories Standard of care.125 mg/kg/day teduglutide.25 mg/kg/day teduglutide.5 mg/kg/day teduglutide 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 16 Standard of care* 4.8 3.7 3.7.125 mg/kg/day -1.3.25 mg/kg/day -3. -13.2-14.9-22.5-28.2-29.5-31.6-36.4-4.5-41.2.5 mg/kg/day -.5-1.9-22.3-24.2-23.2-24.2-33.7-33.7-44.7-44.7 *n=5 (except n=4 at Week 5); n=8 (except n=6 at Week 11 and n=7 at Weeks 1, 4 1, 12, and 16); n=14 (except n=13 at Weeks 12 and 16); n=15 (except n=14 at Weeks 7, 9 12, and 16) PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids) Data points are median values, and error bars are the min and max values Oral Presentation Oral Oral Presentation the XIV International BSPGHAN Oley Foundation 216 Small Annual Bowel Conference, Meeting; Transplant January July Symposium; 5-8, 27 29, 217, New June 216; Greenwich 1 13, Bristol, 215; CT, United USA Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 2.4-2.6-19.3-4.9 8

GAIN IN TIME OFF PS WEEK 12 Change in hours per day of PS infusion, median (min, max) change from baseline Patients who gained 3 days per week off PS, n (%) Patients who achieved PS independence, n (%)* Standard of Care (n=5).125 (n=8) Teduglutide, mg/kg/day.25 (n=14).5 (n=15) ( 2.,.6) (, 2.) 4. ( 9., 2.) 3. ( 12.,.8) () () 1 (7) 4 (27) () () 1 (7) 3 (2) *2 patients resumed PS 4 weeks after teduglutide treatment ended n=7; n=12 PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids) Oral Presentation Oral Presentation Oral the Presentation XIV International BSPGHAN Oley Foundation 216 Small Annual Bowel Annual Meeting; Transplant Conference, January Symposium; July 27 29, 5-8, 217, June 216; New 1 13, Bristol, Greenwich 215; United CT, Buenos Kingdom USA Aires, Argentina 9

ADVANCES IN EN VOLUME Median Weekly EN Volume Change From Baseline, % Median Weekly EN Volume, % Change From Baseline Standard of care*.125 mg/kg/day.25 mg/kg/day.5 mg/kg/day 225 2 175 15 125 1 75 5 25 25 5 75 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 Week EN=enteral nutrition (formula taken by mouth and/or tube feeding) Data points are median values, and error bars are the min and max values 16 (4-week follow-up) Oral Presentation Oral Oral Presentation the XIV International BSPGHAN Oley Foundation 216 Small Annual Bowel Conference, Meeting; Transplant January July Symposium; 5-8, 217, 27 29, New June 216; Greenwich 1 13, Bristol, CT, 215; United USA Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina Volume (per patient diary) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 16 5.4 4.8.6 5.4 2.3 3.5 6.4 17.4 2.3 2.1 12.3 7. 8.2 6. 12.5 1. 2.5 14.4 17.5 *n=4 (except n=3 at Weeks 5, 11, and 12); n=4 (except n=1 at Week 16 and n=3 at Weeks 1 3, 5, and 11); n=13 (except n=11 at Week 16 and n=12 at Weeks 4, 7, 8, and 12); n=1 (except n=8 at Weeks 1 and 12 and n=9 at Weeks 2 4, 9 11, and 16) 7.1 9.6 6.5 13.9 19.9 11. 26.1 22.6 7.1 12.5 32.4 31.2 8.3 12.6 18.8 37.6 Standard of care.125 mg/kg/day teduglutide.25 mg/kg/day teduglutide.5 mg/kg/day teduglutide 8.3 15.7 23.7 37.9 1.7 6.5 2.3 44.9 1.7 21.6 31.5 4.2 23.8 6.3 32.2 37.5 1

ADVANCES IN EN CALORIES Median Weekly EN Calories Change From Baseline, % Median Weekly EN Calories, % Change From Baseline Standard of care*.125 mg/kg/day.25 mg/kg/day.5 mg/kg/day 225 2 175 15 125 1 75 5 25 25 5 75 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 Week 16 (4-week follow-up) *n=4 (except n=3 at Week 5); n=4 (except n=3 at Weeks 5 and 11); n=13; n=1 (except n=9 at Weeks 7, 9 12, and 16) Prescribed Calories 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 16 1.6 8.2 2.3 2.9 11.5 8.2 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.6 6.5 2.2 8.5 3.6 12.2 33.6 8.5 3.6 17.9 39.6 4.3 17.9 39.2 6.3 4.3 23.6 39.6 Standard of care.125 mg/kg/day teduglutide.25 mg/kg/day teduglutide.5 mg/kg/day teduglutide 46.3 4.3 27. 52.1 46.3 4. 27. 42.2 46.3 8.8 27.7 62.2 51.5 1.8 28.6 62.2 EN=enteral nutrition (formula taken by mouth and/or tube feeding) Data points are median values, and error bars are the min and max values Oral Presentation Oral Presentation Oral the Presentation XIV International BSPGHAN Oley Foundation 216 Small Annual Bowel Annual Meeting; Transplant Conference, January Symposium; July 27 29, 5-8, 217, June 216; New 1 13, Bristol, Greenwich 215; United CT, Buenos USA Kingdom Aires, Argentina 11

NUTRITIONAL STATUS BASELINE AND WEEK 12! Clinical and nutritional status parameters were maintained despite PS reductions with teduglutide.25 or.5 mg/kg/day Albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and electrolytes (calcium, magnesium, phosphate) were stable at Week 12 compared with baseline Standard of Care Teduglutide, mg/kg/day Median Weight (min, max) (n=5).125 (n=8).25 (n=14).5 (n=15) Baseline Week 12 12.3 (11.2, 14.8) 13.1 (11.7, 15.7) 13.3 (1.1, 48.7) 16. (11.2, 5.4)* 17.4 (1.3, 44.3) 16.1 (1.5, 38.5) 17.2 (1.2, 53.4) 16.1 (1.8, 35.8) *n=7; n=12; n=13 PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids) Oral Presentation Oral Presentation Oral the Presentation XIV International BSPGHAN Oley Foundation 216 Small Annual Bowel Annual Meeting; Transplant Conference, January Symposium; July 5-8, 27 29, 217, June 216; New 1 13, Greenwich Bristol, 215; United CT, Buenos USA Kingdom Aires, Argentina 12

SAFETY: TEAEs* (TREATMENT-EMERGENT ADVERSE EVENTS)! All patients experienced 1 TEAE; most were mild or moderate TEAEs by Preferred Term, n (%) Patients Standard of Care (n=5) All Teduglutide (n=37) Vomiting 12 (32) Upper respiratory tract infection 2 (4) 1 (27) Catheter-related complication 1 (2) 9 (24) Pyrexia 2 (4) 9 (24) Cough 1 (2) 7 (19) Abdominal pain 1 (2) 6 (16) Headache 5 (14) Nausea 5 (14) Fatigue 5 (14) Blood bicarbonate decreased 2 (4) 5 (14) Diarrhea 1 (2) 4 (11) Fecal volume decreased 4 (11) Central line infection 4 (11) Gastrointestinal stoma complication 1 (25) *TEAEs occurring in 1% of teduglutide-treated patients; percentages based on the number of patients in each treatment group; percentages based on the number of patients with a stoma in each treatment group TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV at International BSPGHAN 216 Small Annual Bowel Meeting; Transplant January Symposium; 27 29, June 216; 1 13, Bristol, 215; United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 13

SAFETY (cont d)! Serious TEAEs were experienced by patients in teduglutide and standard of care groups (46% and 6%, respectively); none were considered related to study treatment! There were no reports of intestinal obstruction, fluid overload, biliary complications (ie, cholecystitis, pancreatitis), or colonic polyp formation! No patients developed neutralizing antibodies to teduglutide Standard of Care Teduglutide, mg/kg/day Serious TEAEs by Preferred Term,* n (%) Patients (n=5).125 (n=8).25 (n=14).5 (n=15) Total (n=37) Central line infection 3 (21) 1 (7) 4 (11) Pyrexia 2 (4) 1 (7) 3 (2) 4 (11) Catheter-related complication 1 (2) 2 (14) 1 (7) 3 (8) Parainfluenza virus infection 1 (7) 1 (7) 2 (5) *Serious TEAEs occurring in 2 teduglutide-treated patients Percentages based on the number of patients in each treatment group TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV Oley at International BSPGHAN Foundation 216 Annual Small Annual Conference, Bowel Meeting; Transplant July January 5-8, Symposium; 217, 27 29, New Greenwich June 216; 1 13, Bristol, CT 215; United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 14

CONCLUSIONS! Treatment with teduglutide in children whose intestinal rehabilitation had plateaued was associated with < PS volume and calories + > EN volume! Teduglutide.5 mg/kg/day Reduced PS volume by 25% and calories by 45% Advanced EN volume by 4% and calories by 62% PS independence was achieved by 2% (3/15) patients 27% (4/15) gained 3 days per week off PS At 4 weeks after discontinuing teduglutide, EN improvements were maintained and 2 patients remained PS independent! Teduglutide had a generally good safety profile and well tolerated in this pediatric population! Clinical and nutritional status was maintained in teduglutide-treated patients despite reductions in PS, suggesting improved intestinal absorption EN=enteral nutrition (formula taken by mouth and/or tube feeding); PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids) Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV Oley at International BSPGHAN Foundation Annual 216 Small Annual Conference, Bowel Meeting; Transplant July 5-8, January Symposium; 217, 27 29, New Greenwich June 216; 1 13, Bristol, CT 215; United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 15

ACKNOWLEDGMENT! Patients, parents, and caregivers for their participation in this study! Study co-investigators B. A. Carter Houston, TX USA V. C. Cohran Chicago, IL USA C. R. Cole Cincinnati, OH USA M. R. Corkins Memphis, TN USA R. A. Dimmitt Birmingham, AL USA C. Duggan Boston, MA USA S. Hill London UK S. Horslen Seattle, WA USA S. A. Kocoshis Cincinnati, OH USA D. F. Mercer Omaha, NE USA R. J. Merritt Los Angeles, CA USA P. F. Nichol Madison, WI USA L. Sigurdsson Madison, WI USA D. H. Teitelbaum Ann Arbor, MI USA J. Thompson New York, NY USA C. Vanderpool Indianapolis, IN USA J. F. Vaughan Little Rock, AK USA R. S. Venick Los Angeles, CA USA J. D. Lim Kansas City, MO USA Oral Presentation Oley Foundation Annual Conference, July 5-8, 217, New Greenwich CT, USA Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV at International BSPGHAN 216 Small Annual Bowel Meeting; Transplant January Symposium; 27 29, June 216; 1 13, Bristol, 215; United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 16

Back-up Slides for Beth Carter Intestinal Adaptation in Children With Short Bowel Syndrome During Treatment With Teduglutide Oral Presentation Oley Foundation Annual Conference, July 5-8, 217, New Greenwich CT, USA Oral Presentation at BSPGHAN 216 Annual Meeting; January 27 29, 216; Bristol, United Kingdom Oral Presentation at the XIV International Small Bowel Transplant Symposium; June 1 13, 215; Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY DESIGN Main Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria Key Inclusion Male and female patients aged 1 17 years Written informed consent by parent or guardian History of SBS due to a major intestinal resection for 12 months before screening that requires PS ( 3% of caloric and/or fluid/electrolyte needs) Stable PS for 3 months without substantial PS reductions ( 1% change in PS or advance in EN feeds) Use of acceptable methods of birth control during and for 3 days after the study in girls of childbearing potential Key Exclusion Body weight <5th percentile for age or <1 kg Hospital admissions: 3 SBS- or PS-related within 3 months of screening or any unscheduled within 1 month of screening Major gastrointestinal surgical intervention, serial transverse enteroplasty, or any bowel lengthening procedure within the past 3 months Unstable absorption due to cystic fibrosis, untreated Hirschsprung disease, or known DNA abnormalities Evidence of untreated intestinal obstruction, active stenosis, upper gastrointestinal obstruction, pseudo-obstruction, or severe dysmotility syndrome History of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease (not including resected cutaneous basal or squamous cell carcinoma or in situ nonaggressive and surgically resected cancer) Active Crohn s disease treated with biological therapy within 6 months of screening or inflammatory bowel disease treated with chronic systemic immunosuppressant therapy that had been started or changed within 3 months of screening Previous use of native GLP-2, GLP-1 analog, human growth hormone, oral or intravenous glutamine, octreotide, or DPP-IV inhibitors within 3 months of screening Previous use of teduglutide DPP-IV=dipeptidyl peptidase-4; EN=enteral nutrition (formula taken by mouth and/or tube feeding); GLP=glucagon-like peptide; PS=parenteral support (parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluids); SBS=short bowel syndrome Oral Presentation Oral Presentation the XIV at International BSPGHAN 216 Small Annual Bowel Meeting; Transplant January Symposium; 27 29, June 216; 1 13, Bristol, 215; United Buenos Kingdom Aires, Argentina 18

INCREASE IN PLASMA CITRULLINE LEVELS Teduglutide, mg/kg/day Median (min, max).125 (n=8).25 (n=14).5 (n=15) Baseline, µmol/l 14.7 (3.8, 25.3) 16.1 (6.4, 29.8) 16.8 (4.5, 3.6) Week 12, µmol/l 18.6 (6.2, 48.2) 22. (7.8, 47.) 16.7 (4.2, 72.9) Change from baseline, µmol/l* 1. (-.8, 22.9) 5.4 (1.1, 17.2) 7.5 (-13.9, 56.5) Change from baseline, %* 11.6 (-4.1, 9.5) 34.2 (1.1, 9.7) 78.2 (-5.7, 344.5) Week 16, µmol/l 15.1 (6.5, 5.6) 17.5 (6.8, 35.8) 9.5 (2.9, 48.2) Change from baseline, µmol/l* 1. (-4.2, 25.3) 1.9 (-2.4, 6.8).4 (-19.1, 28.2) Change from baseline, %* 8 (-3, 1) 12 (-21, 5) 5 (-67, 172) *Median value from individualized calculated values from baseline to Week 12 4 weeks after end of study drug treatment n=7; n=13; n=14 Oral Presentation Oral the XIV Presentation International Oley Foundation Small Bowel Annual Transplant Conference, Oral Presentation at BSPGHAN 216 Annual Meeting; January Symposium; July 5-8, 217, 27 29, June New 216; 1 13, Greenwich Bristol, 215; United Buenos CT, USA Kingdom Aires, Argentina 19