Does Refreshing Recollection Create Memories? The Legal and Scientific Basis for Evaluating Witness in Memory Litigation

Similar documents
ALI-ABA Course of Study Asbestos Litigation in the 21st Century. November 30 - December 1, 2006 New Orleans, Louisiana

Eyewitness Evidence. Dawn McQuiston School of Social and Behavioral Sciences Arizona State University

Biol/Chem 4900/4912. Forensic Internship Lecture 2

Radiological Demonstrative Evidence

Demonstrative Evidence:

December Review of the North Carolina Law of Expert Evidence. NC Is A Daubert State, Finally: State v. McGrady (N.C. S. Ct.

e Magnus Advantage Imagine... Imagine a case where you know the impact of human dynamics, in addition to the law and the issues...

THE RELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE 1. Time to Exonerate Eyewitness Memory. John T. Wixted 1. Author Note

Preparing Witnesses for Direct Examination Master Class: Working with Witnesses ABA 2018 Professional Success Summit By Kalpana Srinivasan

POLICE IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES: A TIME FOR CHANGE

Lieutenant Jonathyn W Priest

Participant Manual DRE 7-Day Session 28 Case Preparation and Testimony

Pros & Cons of Testimonial Evidence. Presentation developed by T. Trimpe

How to Testify Matthew L. Ferrara, Ph.D.

Ethics for the Expert Witness

Cancer case hinges on Hardell testimony Jeffrey Silva

testing for implicit bias

Research on jury instructions An experimental test of the novel NJ instruction

Attorneys Know More about Memory

Court Preparation and Participation

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION. Mary F. Moriarty SPD Annual Conference 2015

An Analysis of the Frye Standard To Determine the Admissibility of Expert Trial Testimony in New York State Courts. Lauren Aguiar Sara DiLeo

Selecting the Best Form of Jury Research for Your Case & Budget

Sleepy Suspects Are Way More Likely to Falsely Confess to a Crime By Adam Hoffman 2016

Pros & Cons of Testimonial Evidence. Presentation developed by T. Trimpe 2006

Forensic Science. Read the following passage about how forensic science is used to solve crimes. Then answer the questions based on the text.

Unit 1: Introduction to Forensic Science Notes Definitions and Background

How to not blow it at On Campus Mock Trial Competition. with Tyler

ASSESSING EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION. Thomas D. Albright The Salk Institute for Biological Studies

IDENTIFICATION: IN-COURT IDENTIFICATION ONLY. (Defendant), as part of his/her general denial of guilt, contends that the State has

Elizabeth Loftus. Lost in the mall study 1992

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY E.G., COMPETENCE TO STAND TRIAL CHILD CUSTODY AND VISITATION WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION INSANITY IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

CAPTURE THE IMAGINATION WITH VISUALIZATION:

Running head: FALSE MEMORY AND EYEWITNESS TESTIMONIAL Gomez 1

Eyewitness Testimony. Student s Name. Institution of Learning

Fitness to Stand Trial

Assessing Sympathy in Voir Dire: Exploring Jurors Intention-Behavior Gap

Medical marijuana vs. workplace policy

The Insanity Defense Not a Solid Strategy. jail card. However, this argument is questionable itself. It is often ignored that in order to apply

Distinction between expert witness and expert testimony. Focus now is whether the testimony will be provided is expert testimony No need for the

PRACTICAL TIPS FOR JURY TRIALS IN PATENT CASES. Scott K. Reed and Ralph A. Dengler FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO

Session Descriptions by Day and Room. Regency AB Ballroom. Regency CD Ballroom THURSDAY NOVEMBER 12

Testifying with Confidence

What is testimonial evidence?

The Validity of Repressed Memories as Evidence. shuts them out, but then is able to recollect memories of them years later? Repressed memory, or

New York Law Journal. Friday, May 9, Trial Advocacy, Cross-Examination of Medical Doctors: Recurrent Themes

ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT IV

EFFECTIVE AND ETHICAL COURT TESTIMONY

Memory part I. Memory Distortions Eyewitness Testimony Lineup Studies

TRIAL IS DIFFERENT Trial Practice Do s and Don ts. Joseph J. Popolizio Holly A. McGee April 20, 2018 Arizona Paralegal Association

Some Possible Legal and Social Implications of Advances in Neuroscience. Henry T. Greely

Expert Witness Research Methods and Data Sources May 2018

Analyze and synthesize the information in this lesson to write a fiveparagraph essay explaining the problems with DNA testing.

Chapter 1 Observation Skills

Trial Preparation for Vocational Experts: A Defense Perspective

WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION FOR IDENTIFICATION NEWSLETTER

Ted Yeshion, Ph.D. Science Subcommittee Chair Professor of Forensic Science Edinboro University of Pennsylvania

THE WETC PSYCHOLOGY NEWSLETTER

SENTENCING ADVOCACY WORKSHOP. Developing Theories and Themes. Ira Mickeberg, Public Defender Training and Consultant, Saratoga Springs, NY

Pros & Cons of Testimonial Evidence ONLINE VERSION

Assessments in Private Practice

the legal investigator The Official Journal of the National Association of Legal Investigators

Ethics: Handling Allegations of Officer Untruthfulness

Pros & Cons of Testimonial Evidence. Presentation developed by T. Trimpe

PSY 310 Forensic Psychology (3 credits) Spring 2010 T/R 9:30 10:45 a.m.

Programme Specification. MSc/PGDip Forensic and Legal Psychology

Singers sometimes find it difficult to recall old song lyrics because of all the new songs they have learned.

Appendix 11 GUIDELINES FOR TRIALS INVOLVING DEAF JURORS WHO SERVE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS

Illinois Supreme Court. Language Access Policy

TECHNOLOGY IN THE COURTROOM: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF COMPUTER ANIMATION. Meghan Dunn, Ph.D. Federal Judicial Center

Psychology and Law. The State ofthe Discipline. Edited by. Ronald Roesch Stephen D. Hart. and. James R. P. Oglof f

The trouble with eyewitness testimony

Next-Generation Sequencing in Toxic Tort Litigation

A Social Workers Role on a Death Penalty Mitigation Defense Team

Forensic Psychology Psyc 350

Introduction to Forensic Science and the Law. Washington, DC

Karen L. Amendola, PhD Police Foundation August 17, 2015

Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University MEMORANDUM

Use of Supporting Evidence With the IME Physician at Trial

MEMORY AND SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH

Many investigators. Documenting a Suspect s State of Mind By PARK DIETZ, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D.

Appendix: Brief for the American Psychiatric Association as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner, Barefoot v. Estelle

Improving Witness (and Attorney) Performance on Direct Examination

Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy

DRAWING ON DAUBERT: BRINGING RELIABILITY TO THE FOREFRONT IN THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION TESTIMONY

Honest Lies? The Impact Of Memory On Criminal Investigations

CLM 2014 Retail, Restaurant & Hospitality Mini-Conference. May 9, 2014 Dallas, Texas CALLING THE EYEWITNESS..THE ADVANTAGE OF BEING THERE

Bias Elimination in Forensic Science to Reduce Errors Act of 2016

How to Conduct an Unemployment Benefits Hearing

School Mental Health and the Expert Witness A Primer for Mental Health and Education Professionals

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

The Admissibility of Repressed and Recovered Memories of. Childhood Sexual Abuse

Brain-based mind reading for lawyers: reflecting on possibilities and perils

SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDENT ATTORNEYS (See also Mock Trial Competition Rules)

Increasing the amount of information that can be held in short-term memory by grouping related items together into a single unit, or chunk.

5/28/2015. Please recall all of the words that you were asked to learn at the beginning of the lecture. 1. Elaborations during encoding

Just Say No : Experts Late Withdrawal From Cases to Preserve Independence and Objectivity

Preparing for Transfer and Amenability Hearings

American College of Forensic Psychology 30 th Annual Symposium March 27-30, 2014 The Westgate Hotel, San Diego. The Insanity Defense and Beyond

Officer-Involved Shooting Investigation. Things to think about ahead of time

Transcription:

Does Refreshing Recollection Create Memories? The Legal and Scientific Basis for Evaluating Witness in Memory Litigation Governo Law Firm partner Bryna Misiura recently co-presented with Charles Weaver, Ph.D. at the 2014 Annual Conference of the Emerging and Environmental Claims Managers Association (EECMA) in early May on the topic Does Refreshing Recollection Create Memories? The Legal and Scientific Basis for Evaluating Witness in Memory Litigation. They discussed widely-held misconceptions that jurors and lay people have with respect to memory, as well as the types of cases where working with memory experts have the real potential to change the outcome of a case. For example, they discussed how deposition or trial preparation can alter the so-called memory of an eyewitness without even the witness recognizing the change. Thus, memory expert testimony has the ability to explain why a witness testimony may seem credible, yet still be flawed. Finally, Ms. Misiura discussed how to combat legal challenges to this testimony, as well as useful practice tips for working with memory experts. Following is the full content of her presentation.

Does Refreshing Recollection Create Memories? The Legal and Scientific Basis for Evaluating Witness Memory in Litigation Bryna Rosen Misiura, Esq. Governo Law Firm LLC Two International Place Boston, MA 02110 (617) 737-9045 www.governo.com [I]n a thousand courts at a thousand places all over the world, witnesses every day affirm by oath... mixtures of truth and untruth, combinations of memory and of illusion, of knowledge and of suggestion, of experience and wrong conclusions. Hugo Musterberg, Ph.D., On the Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology and Crime, 1908 Asbestos Litigation Longest running mass tort in American history (Rand, 2005) Nearly all of the major manufacturers were bankrupt by 2000. Yet Witnesses used to identify all the biggest manufacturers E.g., Johns Manville Witnesses now remember smaller companies and do not identify the biggest manufacturers And, most witnesses seem like they are trying to be truthful!! What is happening? Criminal Cases The Innocence Project Eyewitness identification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing. http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/eyewitness-misidentification.php Eyewitness Misidentification We were always taught. The more you prepare. The better you do. http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/eyewitness-misidentification.php Bryna Rosen Misiura, Esq., Governo Law Firm 1

Most Witnesses Want to Do a Good Job But, Memory is Counter-Intuitive The More You Prepare Decreased Accuracy Increased Confidence Preparation Plaintiff was 17 in the 1970 s when her father did home improvements She testifies that she remembers the products her father used She is a well-educated She testifies confidently She did her homework internet research No corroborating testimony or documents Remembering More Plaintiff testifies he cannot recall the names of two boilers at a particular jobsite Plaintiff s counsel terminates questioning for the day The next morning, plaintiff testifies that he thought about it overnight, and that the two boilers were made by ABC Co. Common Threads Past events (latency issues) Witness remembers key information (product) No corroborating evidence Witness memory sole identification in case Witness saw photographs, performed research, or was otherwise prepared Memory Science Useful in Criminal cases Custody cases Toxic tort cases (asbestos, benzene, silica, etc.) Automobile cases Product liability Next case.. Bryna Rosen Misiura, Esq., Governo Law Firm 2

What Do Memory Experts Do? What do Memory Experts Do? De-mystify the Memory Process Explain how memory has the potential to be altered. Educate Jurors on Misconceptions: Memory does not work like a video recorder or computer Small details are often not recorded, and thus, not recoverable, no matter how hard you try Correct Widely-Held Misconceptions Misunderstanding Memory stores information perfectly Trivial details of events are as well remembered as important details Retrieval of information from memory is complete and accurate Forgetting is usually the result of an inability to recall information, rather than a failure to store it Scientific Understanding Memory is highly selective, encoding and storing only certain elements. Details which are central to an event are much more likely to be recalled than events that are peripheral. Memories can be distorted in many ways during the retrieval process, such as with leading questions. Much of what is commonly believed to be forgetting is more accurately portrayed as a failure to encode the information to begin with. More Misconceptions Misunderstanding Refreshing recollection produced unbiased memories Memories are stable over time. When remembering episodes and facts, retain the source of the information, as well as the content Scientific Understanding When suggestive techniques are used to refresh memory, they often have the effect of creating memories for events that never transpired. Memory changes over time as the result of a number of factors such as retrieval context, newly acquired information, and misinformation presented after the original event. The phenomenon of source confusion exerts powerful effects on eyewitness reliability. Witnesses often retain the context of newly learned information, but they misattribute the source. More Misconceptions Misunderstanding Confidence is a reliable indicator of accuracy in eyewitness memory Careful witnesses can eliminate the possible effects of suggestible questioning Scientific Understanding The relationship between confidence and accuracy in eyewitness memory is modest at best. Factors influencing eyewitness confidence and eyewitness accuracy are not necessarily the same. As a result, questioning practice can inflate confidence without improving accuracy. Clear warnings about possible misinformation do not always eliminate their effects. Deposition Preparation Internet Research Pictures Power of suggestion Many people like you. Power of questions Smashed Collided Came in contact Bryna Rosen Misiura, Esq., Governo Law Firm 3

Spectrum What Else do Memory Experts Do? Subtle Acknowledgment Outright Fabrication Testify about factors known to compromise reliability of memory, and offer opinions as to the presence or absence of factors in the case Memory Loss (E.g., Alzheimer's/Dementia) Prescription Medications Drug and alcohol use Medical Records What Memory Experts DON T Do: Testify if a witness is being truthful or credible Expert not present to observe first hand? Post-Trial Interviews Memory experts are persuasive in deliberations Show fallibility of witness memory following leading questions Scientifically established factors that affect memory of brands, exposures, and products On a scale of 1 to 10, jurors rank memory experts in the range of 7 to 10 with respect to their importance in rendering a verdict. G. Huelsmann, Memory Experts in Toxic Tort Litigation, DRI Today, 2011 Challenges by Plaintiffs Counsel You distrust the veracity of my sick or dying plaintiff? So-called memory experts invade the province of the jury Information within the jury s common knowledge Usurp the jury s role by commenting on credibility Presumption that memories fade over time, and newer ones more reliable Legal Standard Varies by jurisdiction But, most jurisdictions leave broad discretion to the trial judge to assess whether: An expert is qualified The testimony is relevant to a question at issue The testimony is grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Bryna Rosen Misiura, Esq., Governo Law Firm 4

Memory Science Well Established Other Ideas Memory and cognition are valid scientific areas of study in the field of psychology Many peer reviewed journals reporting research in the field Memory and cognition have been funded by the National Science Foundation and other federal agencies Major universities offer courses in this area Nobel Prize in area of human cognition More than 50 members of the National Academy of Science are experimental psychologists Consider videotaping your depositions Ask memory questions that are verifiable Children s names and addresses Street intersections Navy ship captain, ports of call, ship characteristics Know your case law regarding deposition breaks Review medical records for memory diagnoses or prescription medications for memory loss Opportunity.. Generally admissible in criminal cases Challenged frequently in toxic tort cases, but admitted in most instances Next cases.. Memory Experts Allow defendants to challenge the claimed memories of a plaintiff without arguing that the ill plaintiff is lying Give juries the tools to understand why a witness can look credible, but be mistaken Questions? Jurisdictions Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire New York Rhode Island Practice Areas Asbestos Coverage Construction Data Privacy & Cyber Risk Environmental Insurance Defense Product Liability Reinsurance Toxic Torts Founded in 1995, Governo Law Firm has earned an outstanding reputation as an elite law firm with the talent, determination, and resources to deliver superior results. Our 18 attorneys specialize in the defense of cases involving complex, technical, scientific, medical and legal issues. Our comprehensive risk management counseling is based on a thorough, nuanced, multi-dimensional approach rooted in sophisticated legal analysis and practical problem-solving. We hold Martidale-Hubbell s highest rating (AV) and many of our attorneys have received the prestigious honor of being selected as New England Super Lawyers and Rising Stars. Our team includes attorneys with diverse backgrounds, outstanding experience and achievements. We are united by a bold and creative spirit and are committed to serving our clients. Bryna Rosen Misiura, Esq., Governo Law Firm 5