MICROBIAL INOCULANT EFFECTS ON IN SITU RUMINAL DRY MATTER AND NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER DISAPPEARANCE OF CORN SILAGE

Similar documents
DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Effects of the use of EM-silage in corn silage

EFFECT OF RYEGRASS SILAGE DRY MATTER CONTENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS

Using Feed Analysis to Troubleshoot Nutritional Problems in Dairy Herds 1

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

Calcium Oxide and Calcium Hydroxide Treatment of Corn Silage

Evaluation of Ruma Pro (a calcium-urea product) on microbial yield and efficiency in continuous culture

Protein and Carbohydrate Utilization by Lactating Dairy Cows 1

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

THE EFFECTS OF CELLULASE ON CELL WALL STRUCTURE AND THE RUMEN DIGESTION OF ALFALFA SILAGE

INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS

TRANSITION COW NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT. J.E. Shirley

Update on Corn Shredlage for Dairy Cows

Assessing Your J Grennan & Sons Silage Report.

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

INCLUSION OF FAT IN DIETS FOR EARLY LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS. J. E. Shirley and M. E. Scheffel

Effect of the Frequency of Corn Supplementation on a High Quality Alfalfa Hay Utilization by Cattle

Results of UW Madison Corn Shredlage Feeding Trial

FACING THE DIMINISHING CORN SUPPLY: DAIRY ALTERNATIVES

Established Facts. Impact of Post Harvest Forage on the Rumen Function. Known Facts. Known Facts

Silage Management 101: The Basics

EFFECTS OF FEEDING WHOLE COTTONSEED COATED WITH STARCH, UREA, OR YEAST ON PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING DAIRY COWS

What s the Latest on Carbohydrates, Starch Digestibility, Shredlage and Snaplage for Dairy Cows?

Nonstructural and Structural Carbohydrates in Dairy Cattle Rations 1

Phase B 5 Questions Correct answers are worth 10 points each. a) lactation b) cystic c) anestrus d) placenta

Applied Beef Nutrition Ration Formulation Short Course. Beef Ration and Nutrition Decision Software

Practical forage-ndf range in high-group TMR. Nutritional Constraints. Variable ruminal & total tract digestibility of starch

FACING THE DIMINISHING CORN SUPPLY: DAIRY ALTERNATIVES

Harvesting and Preserving More Nutrients from Your Forages

SHREDLAGE IN DAIRY CATTLE RATIONS. L. E. Chase Cornell University

Stretching Limited Hay Supplies: Wet Cows Fed Low Quality Hay Jason Banta, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension

Silage from Agricultural By-products in Thailand: Processing and Storage

Heidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA. Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective

Storage of Wet Distillers Grains

Formulating Lactating Cow Diets for Carbohydrates

EFFECT OF LEVEL OF SURFACE SPOILAGE ON THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MAIZE SILAGE DIETS. K. K. Bolsen, L. A. Whitlock, G. L. Huck, M. K.

2009 Forage Production and Quality Report for Pennsylvania

Production Costs. Learning Objectives. Essential Nutrients. The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion

Effects of Varying Rates of Tallgrass Prairie Hay and Wet Corn Gluten Feed on Productivity of Dairy Cows

SUBSTITUTING STEAM-FLAKED CORN WITH DISTILLER S GRAINS ALTERS RUMINAL FERMENTATION AND DIET DIGESTIBILITY

Practical Application of New Forage Quality Tests

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ADDITIVES ON SILAGE QUALITY OF NAPIERGRASS. Y.K.Cheng, C.S. Chen and P.W. Peng

Current strategies to increase nutritive value of corn silage. Luiz Ferraretto 1 and Randy Shaver 2

Forage crops legumes, grasses, whole-plant

MANAGING THE DAIRY COW DURING THE DRY PERIOD

Introduction. Carbohydrate Nutrition. Microbial CHO Metabolism. Microbial CHO Metabolism. CHO Fractions. Fiber CHO (FC)

RFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER

Dairy Report. Table of Contents

ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Efficient Use of Forages and Impact on Cost of Production

Ruminal degradability of neutral detergent insoluble protein of selected protein sources

Oilseed Meal Processing and Feeding Trials. William Gibbons Michael Brown, Jill Anderson South Dakota State University

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

As Sampled Basis nutrient results for the sample in its natural state including the water. Also known as as fed or as received.

SHREDLAGE/CLAAS Launch Exciting New Alliance. Roger Olson Technical Director

Chapter 20 Feed Preparation and Processing

Why is forage digestibility important?

Phase B 5 Questions Correct answers are worth 10 points each.

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle. E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett. Take Home Message

Optimizing Starch Concentrations in Dairy Rations

Reproductive efficiency Environment 120 Low P ( ) High P ( ) ays

The Effect of Heat Treatment of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration

BENCHMARKING FORAGE NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY. R. D. Shaver, Ph.D., PAS

QUALITY AND NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MOTT DWARF ELEPHANTGRASS SILAGE WITH BIOLOGICAL ADDITIVES. T. Clavero. La Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela.

The Effects of Different Silage Additives on in vitro Gas Production, Digestibility and Energy Values of Sugar Beet Pulp Silage

Nutritive Value of Feeds

HarvestLab John Deere Constituent Sensing

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING PRAIRIE HAY WITH TWO LEVELS OF CORN AND FOUR LEVELS OF DEGRADABLE INTAKE PROTEIN. II. RUMINAL PARAMETERS OF STEERS.

SHREDLAGE/CLAAS Launch Exciting New Alliance. Roger Olson Technical Director

Optimizing Forage Quality in Corn Silage

High Plains Biofuels Co-product Nutrition Conference. What Have We Learned?

CHANGES IN RUMINAL MICROBIAL POPULATIONS IN TRANSITION DAIRY COWS

Fiber Digestibility & Corn Silage Evaluation. Joe Lawrence Cornell University PRO-DAIRY

ADJUSTING NET ENERGY VALUES OF FEEDS FED TO DAIRY COWS

Practically improving the feeding value of your maize silage for livestock and AD

Sheep Feeding Programs: Forage and Feed Analysis

The four stomachs of a dairy cow

BONSILAGE SILAGE INOCULANTS

BASIC NUTRITION LIQUID VIEWPOINT

COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?

2017 WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA CORN SILAGE VARIETY TEST REPORT

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

Feeding Practices in Top U.S. Jersey Herds

Why Graze? Supplementing Lactating Cows Requires Different Thinking. Grazing when grazing wasn t cool!! WHY? Good Pasture WVU Circular 379 Early 50s

Silage for beef cattle 2018 CONFERENCE. sponsored by: LALLEMAND ANIMAL NUTRITION

Pounds of Protein and Fat (2015-DHIR)

The Rumen Inside & Out

Normand St-Pierre The Ohio State University. Copyright 2011 Normand St-Pierre, The Ohio State University

Ensiling quality of maize as influenced by the addition of wet distillers grains with soluble

WHAT SOLUBLE SUGARS AND ORGANIC ACIDS CAN DO FOR THE RUMEN

In-Vitro Starch and NDF Digestibility Using Rumen Fluid from Control and Bovamine Supplemented Cows

Impact of Vitreousness, Processing, and Chop Length on the Utilization of Corn Silage by Dairy Cows

BUILDING ON MILK PROTEIN

nutrient loss in high moisture forage Department of Animal Sciences IFAS

Dietary Protein. Dr. Mark McGuire Dr. Jullie Wittman AVS Department University of Idaho

High Sulfur Content in Distillers Grains Alters Ruminal Fermentation and Diet Digestibility in Beef Steers

Dairy Update. Issue 110 July 1992 ALTERNATIVE FEEDSTUFFS FOR DAIRY. Vern Oraskovich Agriculture Extension Agent Carver County

Transcription:

MROBAL NOULANT EFFETS ON N STU RUMNAL DRY MATTER AND NEUTRAL DETERGENT FBER DSAPPEARANE OF ORN SLAGE Kathryn E. owles and Michael R. Murphy TAKE HOME MESSAGES Addition of an inoculant blend improved the conservation and feeding value of silage from a hybrid that contained 40% dry matter (60% moisture) at harvest, but not for a second hybrid that contained 34% dry matter (66% moisture) at harvest. Silage inoculants may be more effective for silages with high dry matter contents. NTRODUTON Microbial silage inoculants can improve conservation and digestibility of corn silage. This experiment was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a prototype microbial inoculant on composition and in situ ruminal dry matter () and neutral detergent fiber disappearance (NDF) of corn silage. MATERALS AND METHODS Two different corn hybrids ( and ) were harvested as whole plant corn forage at 1/8 to 1/3 milk line at a theoretical chop length of 0.95 to 1.25 cm using a forage harvester (model 1285; Gehl, West Bend, W). Two representative samples of chopped corn from each hybrid were retained for nutrient analysis (Table 1). One gram of each experimental inoculant was weighed into a clean container and mixed with one liter of clean water. For inoculation, forage was placed in a heavy plastic garbage bag. One of two treatments was applied: a control (no inoculant) or a blend of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. casei (Pioneer Hi-Bred, a DuPont Business, Johnston, A). noculant liquids were applied at a rate of 2 ml/kg of fresh forage using a syringe while hand-mixing the forage. Eight silos were prepared, in plastic food storage bags holding about 600 g of wet material, for each hybrid-inoculant combination. Air was evacuated, silos were heat sealed, and then stored at room temperature. At days 60 and 120 post ensiling, 16 silos chosen at random were opened (4 from each hybridinoculant combination). Samples from day 60 were analyzed for nutrients, ph and volatile fatty acid concentrations. Three lactating Holstein cows with ruminal cannulas were used to determine disappearance of and NDF from ensiled samples. The cows average weight was 1433 ± 176 lb. Milk production averaged 0 ± 19 lb. ows, housed in individual tie stalls, had free choice access to a totally mixed ration based on corn silage, alfalfa silage, ground corn, and soybean meal with fresh feed provided once daily at :00 AM. Nitrogen-free polyester bags containing 60 and 120-day samples also were placed in a mesh bag that was suspended within the rumen and incubated for 24 or 48 hours. When withdrawn from the rumen, bags were rinsed first with 8

cold water and then washed for 2 min in a washing machine on the rinse cycle. Bags containing residues from digestion were dried and analyzed for and NDF to calculate disappearance of and NDF during ruminal digestion. RESULTS AND DSUSSON Although was drier at harvest than (Table 1), crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, nonfiber carbohydrate, ash, and ph of the two chopped forages were similar. Silages from the two hybrids differed in their response to the inoculant blend after 60 days of fermentation (Table 2). The percentages of, nonfiber carbohydrate, acetic acid, and propionate increased more when the blend of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. casei was applied to than when it was applied to. n contrast, the content of neutral detergent fiber, lactic acid, and lactic acid:acetic acid decreased more when the inoculant blend was applied to than when it was applied to. Ruminal degradation of the silages was influenced by hybrid, inoculant, ensilage time (either 60 or 120 days), and time in the rumen. The disappearance in the rumen of after 60 days of ensilage was 6% higher for the inoculant blend than for the control (Figure 1); whereas, it was 4% lower for. After 120 days of ensilage, disappearance of was 6% higher for the inoculant blend than for the control; whereas, it was unchanged for. The interaction of hybrid, inoculant, and time in the rumen also indicated that the inoculant blend enhanced disappearance in the rumen (Figure 2; and 7% at 24 and 48 hours, respectively) compared to the control for. Neutral detergent fiber disappearance in the rumen of after 60 days of ensilage was 1% higher for the inoculant blend than for the control (Figure 3); however, neither inoculant nor time of ensilage affected the NDF disappearance of. After 120 days of ensilage, NDF disappearance in the rumen of was still 14% higher for the inoculant blend than for the control. Differences in the composition and ruminal degradation of corn silages indicated that the inoculant blend improved the conservation and feeding values of the hybrid that was 40% (60% moisture) at harvest but not those of the hybrid that was 34% (66% moisture) at harvest. 9

Table 1. haracteristics of whole corn plant hybrids ( and ) at harvest. tem SEM 1 ontrast, % 34.5 40.0 0.35 0.007 P, % of 8.1 7.8 0.46 0.648 NDF, % of 43.6 45.7 1.59 0.439 ADF, % of 25.0 25.7 1.95 0.811 NF, % of 40.9 39.3 1.05 0.396 Ash, % of 4.4 4.4 0.06 0.882 ph 5.8 6.1 0.13 0.300 1 Standard error of the mean. Table 2. omposition of silage from two corn hybrids ( and ) ensiled for 60 days after treatment with one of two inoculants (control or a blend of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. casei (Pioneer Hi-Bred, a DuPont Business, Johnston, A). ontrasts 1 tem ontrol Blend ontrol Blend SEM 2 H H x, % 32.1 32.3 37.2 39.6 0.34 <0.0001 0.0022 0.0057 P, % of 8.98 9.00 8.28 8.53 0.08 <0.0001 0.89 0.1819 ADF, % of 22.83 23.26 27.53 24.75 0.76 0.0016 0.1509 0.0567 NDF, % of 39.40 38.93 48.68 41.05 1.07 0.0002 0.0026 0.0059 NF, % of 44.23 44.60 35.88 42.63 1.07 0.0004 0.0061 0.0117 Ash, % of 3.30 4.23 4.78 4.54 0.44 0.6280 0.4437 0.2065 ph 3.90 3.90 3.95 4.00 0.01 0.0002 0.89 0.89 Lactic acid, % of 7.17 6.56 7.03 5.59 0.15 0.0029 <0.0001 0.0176 Acetic acid, % of 1.54 1.49 1.29 1.75 0.07 0.9264 0.04 0.0024 LA:AA 3 4.73 4.46 5.49 3.22 0.25 0.3481 0.0003 0.0018 Propionate, % of 0.000 0.000 0.001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.000 0.025 Butyrate, % of 0.035 0.023 0.005 0.0075 1.0000 0.6027 0.038 0.020 Total acids, % of 8.80 8.14 8.37 7.47 0.14 0.0016 <0.0001 0.4039 1 H = hybrid, = inoculant. 2 Standard error of the mean. 3 Lactic acid:acetic acid.

50 40-4% +6% +6% digested, % 30 20 0 Hybrid (H) P < 0.0001 noculant () P < 0. Opening time P < 0.0001 HxxO P < 0.02 60 120 Silage fermentation time, days Figure 1. n situ dry matter disappearance of silage from two corn hybrids ( or ) ensiled for either 60 or 120 days after treatment with one of two inoculants (control or a blend of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. casei (Pioneer Hi-Bred, a DuPont Business, Johnston, A). 11

30 25 +1% +14% NDF digested, % 20 15-13% +17% 5 0 Hybrid (H) P < 0.13 noculant () P < 0.02 Opening time P < 0.12 HxxO P < 0.04 60 120 Silage fermentation time, days Figure 2. n situ neutral detergent fiber disappearance of silage from two corn hybrids ( or ) ensiled for either 60 or 120 days after treatment with one of two inoculants (control or a blend of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. casei (Pioneer Hi-Bred, a DuPont Business, Johnston, A). 12

Dry matter digested, % 70 60 50 40 30 20 0 Hybrid by noculant by Time nteraction (P =.03) +% ontrol noc ontrol noc 0 24 48 Rumen incubation time, hours +7% Figure 3. n situ dry matter disappearance at 0, 24, or 48 h in the rumen of silage from two corn hybrids ( or ) treated with one of two inoculants (control or a blend of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. casei (Pioneer Hi-Bred, a DuPont Business, Johnston, A). 13