IBD Updates. Themes in IBD IBD management journey. New tools for therapeutic monitoring. First-line treatment in IBD

Similar documents
September 12, 2015 Millie D. Long MD, MPH, FACG

Update on Biologics in Ulcerative Colitis. Scott Plevy, MD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC

Emerging g therapies for IBD: A practical approach to positioning. Sequential Therapies for IBD

An Update on the Biologic Treatment for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. David A. Schwartz, MD

Immunogenicity of Biologic Agents and How to Prevent Sensitization

Severe IBD: What to Do When Anti- TNFs Don t Work?

Mono or Combination Therapy with. Individualized Approach

Disclosures. What Do I Do When Anti-TNF Therapy Is Not Working Anymore? Fadi Hamid, M.D. Saint Luke s GI Specialists

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment for Pediatric IBD

The following slides are provided as presented by the author during the live educa7onal ac7vity and are intended for reference purposes only.

Mucosal healing: does it really matter?

Biologics in IBD. Brian P. Bosworth, MD, NYSGEF Associate Professor of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College

Recent Advances in the Management of Refractory IBD

Predicting response to anti - integrin therapy: long term efficacy and roles for optimisation with vedolizumab.

Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory. Is Top-Down Too Top-Heavy? S. Devi Rampertab, MD, FACG, AGAF Associate Professor of Medicine University of Florida

Association Between Plasma Concentrations of Certolizumab Pegol and Endoscopic Outcomes of Patients With Crohn's Disease

Agenda. Predictive markers in IBD. Management of ulcerative colitis. Management of Crohn s disease

Drug Level Monitoring in IBD. Objectives

How to Optimize Induction and Maintenance Responses: Definitions and Dosing Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Disease December 6, 2009

Beyond Anti TNFs: positioning of other biologics for Crohn s disease. Christina Ha, MD Cedars Sinai Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center

Common Questions in Crohn s Disease Therapy. Case

Azathioprine for Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Crohn s Disease

Positioning New Therapies

Medical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Join the conversation at #GIFORUMCCFA

Selection and use of the non-anti- TNF biological therapies: Who? When? How?

Personalized Medicine. Selecting the Right First-line Biologic Agent. Gene Expression Profiles Crohn s Disease. The Right Treatment

Ulcerative Colitis: Refining our Management and Incorporating Newer Concepts

The Best of IBD at UEGW (Crohn s)

2nd Nottingham IBD Masterclass, 2017

Optimizing the effectiveness of anti-tnf therapy in paediatric IBD

Position of Biologics in IBD Circa 2006: Top Down vs. Step Up Therapy

Il ruolo degli anticorpi anti farmaco nella pratica clinica

John F. Valentine, MD Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program University of Utah

Από τη θεωρία στη πράξη: Συζήτηση κλινικών περιστατικών. Κωνσταντίνος Κατσάνος Επίκουρος Καθηγητής Γαστρεντερολογίας Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων

Treatment Goals. Current Therapeutic Pyramids Crohn s Disease Ulcerative Colitis 11/14/10

When can I stop taking my medications? Maria T. Abreu, MD University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida

Moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disorder

Anne Griffiths MD, FRCPC. SickKids Hospital, University of Toronto. Buenos Aires, August 16, 2014

The Refractory Crohn s Disease

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment for Pediatric IBD

Positioning Biologics in Ulcerative Colitis

Personalized Medicine in IBD

Optimizing the treatment of IBD through use of therapeutic drug monitoring

Treating to Achieve a Target and Disease Monitoring in 2015: State of the Art

Managing Complications of IBD and Its Therapies David T. Rubin, MD, AGAF

Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disorder

Anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have

Crohn's Disease. The What, When, and Why of Treatment

Mucosal Healing in Crohn s Disease. Geert D Haens MD, PhD University Hospital Gasthuisberg University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium

5/2/2018 SHOULD DEEP REMISSION BE A TREATMENT GOAL? YES! Disclosures: R. Balfour Sartor, MD

Gionata Fiorino VEDOLIZUMAB E IBD. Un nuovo target terapeutico

Medical Therapy for Pediatric IBD: Efficacy and Safety

CCFA. Crohns Disease vs UC: What is the best treatment for me? November

Personalized Medicine in IBD: Where Are We in 2013

Emerging Therapies in IBD 2006

Anti-TNF and cyclosporine are identical choices for severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroid therapy CON Peter Laszlo LAKATOS Semmelweis

Optimal Use of Immunomodulators and Biologics

Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disorder

Indications for use of Infliximab

Initiation of Maintenance Treatment in Moderate to Severe New Onset Crohn s Disease

Latest Treatment Updates for Crohn s Disease: Tailoring Therapy David G. Binion, M.D.

Progress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

U of Cape Town, South Africa, 10 U of Washington, Seattle, WA,USA, 11 CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France, 12

IBD Understanding Your Medications. Thomas V. Aguirre, MD Santa Barbara GI Consultants

Latest Meds Approved for IBD: What are they and how do they work?

Definitions. Clinical remission: Resolution of symptoms (stool frequency 3/day, no bleeding and no urgency)

Biologic Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis in 2015

How to use infliximab?

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory

Therapies for IBD: the Pipeline. New Therapeutic Agents in IBD

Withdrawal of drug therapy in patients with quiescent Crohn s disease

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring και ΙΦΝΕ το 2018

CAG Symposium: Management of IBD in 2018

CROHN'S DISEASE/ULCERATIVE COLITIS TREATMENT ALGORITHM

Biologics, Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Optimizing Therapies for Severe Ulcerative Colitis October 19, 2014

Management of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

New and Future Adhesion Molecule Based Therapies in IBD

Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Management of Refractory Crohn s Disease

WHY HAVE WE NOT FINALLY FIGURED OUT COMBINATION THERAPY?

OPTIMAL USE OF IMMUNOMODULATORS AND BIOLOGICS Edward V. Loftus, Jr., MD, FACG

Achieving Success in Ulcerative Colitis: the Role of Infliximab

New Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of IBD. Disclosures

Endpoints for Stopping Treatment in UC

COPYRIGHT. Inflammatory Bowel Disease What Every Clinician Needs to Know. Adam S. Cheifetz, MD. Director, Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Implementation of disease and safety predictors during disease management in UC

Latest Treatment Updates for Ulcerative Colitis: Evolving Treatment Goals

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 3 October 2012

IBD Biologicals and Novel therapeutic regimes. Dr S K Sinha Additional Professor Department of Gastroenterology PGIMER, Chandigarh

Treatment of ulcerative colitis with adalimumab or infliximab: long-term follow-up of a single-centre cohort

Current and Emerging Biologics for Ulcerative Colitis

CLINICAL INSIGHTS 01

Personalized Medicine: IBD

Op#mizing)Management)in)IBD:) Mucosal)Healing)

New treatment options in IBD: today and the future. Silvio Danese Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy

Case Example: Exposure Response to Support Extrapolation of Efficacy in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

Primary & Secondary Care Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathway February 2018

Transcription:

IBD Updates Maria T. Abreu, MD University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida Themes in IBD 213 First-line treatment in IBD New tools for therapeutic monitoring Biologic therapy for CD and UC New targets and new drugs IBD management journey Induction of remission Maintenance of remission Maintenance of remission off steroids and / or mucosal healing (histology)

Impact of Vitamin D on Risk for Surgery and Hospitalization in IBD One-third of patients were deficient (25[OH]D <2 ng/ml) and 27% were insufficient In CD patients, plasma 25[OH]D <2 ng/ml was associated with: Increased risk for surgery (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.25-2.51) Increased risk for hospitalization (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.59-2.68) Similar associations were seen for UC In CD patients, normalization of vitamin D status was associated with reduced likelihood of surgery (OR.48; 95% CI.32-.7) and hospitalization (OR.51; 95% CI.38-.69) Normalization of vitamin D status was associated with lower median CRP levels Ananthakrishnan AN et al. Abstract 1. 25 Budesonide MMX for UC: Primary Endpoint Combined Clinical and Endoscopic Remission 2 * ** *** % of Patients 15 1 5 N=12 N=8 1 9 Asa.= Asacol Ent.= Entocort B-MMX= Budesonide MMX N=21 N=12 3 N=1 9 N=23 2 N=121 N=19 N=23 N=124 N=13 Placebo B-MMX 9 mg B-MMX 6 mg Asa./Ent. Sandborn WJ et al. Gastroenterology 212 Nov;143(5):1218-26 Travis,S et al. Gut. 213 Feb 22. *p=.143 **p=.47 ***p=.2 Biologics, combo therapy and other management issues Anti-TNFs in UC Infliximab versus Cyclo Post-op prevention of CD Discontinuing biologics

Biologics in IBD Infliximab cover Gastro 1995; NEJM 1997 (ca2) Adalimumab for Crohn s disease (22) Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn s disease (28) Adalimumab for UC (212) Infliximab approved for Crohn s disease 1998 Infliximab for ulcerative colitis (25) Natalizumab for Crohn s disease (28) Golimumab for UC (213) SONIC Clinical Remission Without Corticosteroids at Week 26 Primary Endpoint Proportion of Patients (%) 1 p<.1 8 p=.9 p=.22 6 57 45 4 3 2 13 52/17 75/169 96/169 AZA + placebo IFX + placebo IFX+ AZA Colombel, J.F., et al., N Engl J Med. 362(15): p. 1383-95. IBD has common genetic origins NOD2 PTPN22 CD genes 3 CD specific loci 11 IBD loci Common pathways: Leprosy Mycobacterial susceptibility Other immunemediated disease UC genes 23 UC specific loci MHC Genes in common Jostins, L. et al. Nature 491, 119 124 (1 November 212)

UC SUCCESS Moderate-to-severe UC failing steroids Naive to azathioprine or had stopped 3 months prior to entry Excluded intermediate TPMT activity AZA 2.5mg/kg IFX 5mg/kg IFX + AZA 1 endpoint: Steroid-free remission at week 16 (total Mayo score 2) 2 endpoint: mucosal healing Panaccione R et al. DDW 211; Abstract 835 UC SUCCESS study Patients (%) * *P<.5 compared to IFX; #P<.5 compared to AZA Panaccione R et al. DDW 211; Abstract 835 Adalimumab in UC 4% of patients in trial were previously anti TNF exposed Week 8 Week 52 Weeks 8 and 52 P<.1 5.4 P=.3 41.1 Placebo Adalimumab (n=248) Patients (%) P=.2 16.5 P<.1 17.3 P<.1 3.2 P<.1 25 P<.5 P<.1 23.8 P=.1 18.5 8.5 Sandborn WJ et al. Gastroenterology. 212 Feb;142(2):257-65

Proportion of patients (%) 1 8 6 4 2 Golimumab in UC (PURSUIT-SC): Clinical Response at Week 6 Randomized Patients in Phase 3 29.7 p<.1 p<.1 51.8 55. * * Placebo (n=256) 2 mg 1 mg (n=257) 4 mg 2 mg (n=258) Defined as a decrease from baseline in the Mayo score by 3% and 3 points, with either a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of 1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of or 1 W Sandborn et al. Gastroenterology. 213 Jun 1. Golimumab in UC (PURSUIT-SC): Maintenance of Clinical Response Through Week 54 Proportion of patients (%) 1 8 6 4 2 Randomized Patients in Clinical Response to Golimumab Induction 31.4 Placebo (n=156) p=.1 p<.1 Defined as a decrease from Week of the induction studies in the Mayo score by 3% and 3 points, with either a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of 1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of or 1 47.1 GLM 5 mg (n=153) 5.6 GLM 1 mg (n=154) Rutgeerts P, et al. UEGW 212 CsA vs IFX in IV Steroid- Refractory UC: The CYSIF Study Colectomy-free survival 1..8.6.4.2 Time to Colectomy p=.66 Day 7 response rates: CsA = 84%; IFX = 86% (P=.76) Colectomy rate Cys: 18 ± 5% (n=1) IFX: 21± 5% (n=13) CsA n=55 IFX n=56 14 28 42 56 7 84 98 Days since randomisation % of patients 56 53 5 46 46 46 45 41 at risk 55 52 5 46 45 45 45 42 Laharie D et al. Lancet. 212 Dec 1;38(9857):199-15.

Comparative Efficacy of Adalimumab vs Immunomodulators and 5-ASA in Preventing Postoperative Recurrence of CD Patients (N=51) with CD who had undergone ileocolonic resection Randomized to receive adalimumab, azathioprine, or mesalamine 2 weeks after surgery Patients followed for 2 years Quality of life higher in adalimumab group Savarino E et al. Abstract 92 Genoa Italy Can we ever stop biologics? Usually continue indefinitely but may be subset of patients on immunomodulators that can stop Maintaining remission on antimetabolites after stopping infliximab in Crohn s disease: a prospective cohort study STORI Kaplan-Meier Curve of Relapse n=52 relapses/115 patients Median follow-up 28+/- 2 months Median time to relapse: 16.4 months Louis E, et al. Gastroenterology. 212 Jan;142(1):63-7

Predictive Model for Time-to-Relapse Kaplan Meier time-to-relapse curves according to multivariate models and scores generated through Cox model using multiple imputations Proportion without relapse Deleterious factors were: No previous surgery method No. of deleterious factors 1..8 <4.6 4.4.2 5 6. >6 6 12 18 24 3 Months since infliximab withdrawal Steroid use within 12-6 months before infliximab withdrawal Male gender Haemoglobin 14.5 g/dl Louis E, et al. Gastroenterology. 212 Jan;142(1):63-7 leukocyte count >6 1 9 /l hscrp 5 mg/l faecal calprotectin 3 µg/g CDEIS > infliximab trough 2 mg/l Tools for guiding therapy Emerging concept: more inflammation requires more anti-tnf Higher drug levels correlate with mucosal healing Clinical Outcomes at >52 Weeks According to Trough Infliximab Concentration Clinical Remission C-reactive Protein Endoscopic Change *P<.1 * *P<.1 *P<.1 * * Undetectable 2. ug/ml Undetectable 2. ug/ml Undetectable 2. ug/ml Maser EA et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 26;4:1248-1254. 31

SONIC: IFX Trough Levels at Week 3* are Higher with Concomitant AZA Median Serum Trough Levels (mg/ml) (N=97) (N=19) * Patients who had 1 or more PK samples obtained after their first study agent administration were included in the analysis Sandborn, W. et al. NEJM, 21 Trough Concentration of Infliximab is Higher With Concurrent Methotrexate 6.35 Infliximab plus µg/l 3.75 Feagan B et al. DDW 28. Abs no. 682C. Benefit of Immunomodulators with anti-tnf on Antibody Formation Infliximab 1 (CD 5 mg/kg) (CD 1 mg/kg) Infliximab 2 (UC 5 mg/kg) (UC 1 mg/kg) Patients, % Episodic Maintenance Scheduled Maintenance IMS- IMS+ IMS- IMS+ 38% 16% 11% 8% 7% 4% No data 19% 9% 2% 4% Certolizumab 3 (PRECiSE I) 1% 4% Certolizumab 4 (PRECiSE II) 24% 8% 12% 2% Adalimumab 5 (RA, all doses) 12% 1% No data Adalimumab 6 (CLASSIC II) 4% % IMS, immunosuppressant; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; UC, ulcerative colitis 1. Hanauer et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 24;2(7):542. 2. Sandborn WJ, et al. Presented at DDW; May 19 24, 27. Abstract T1273. 3. Sandborn WJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 27;357:228. 4. Schreiber S, et al. N Engl J Med. 27;357:239. 5. Summary of Product Characteristics for adalimumab. Abbott Laboratories. July 27. 6. Sandborn WJ, et al. Gut. 27;56:1232.

Detectable Serum Trough IFX Concentration is Associated with Higher Remission Rate and Endoscopic Improvement in UC Patients % of patients P<.1 Undetectable serum IFX predicted an increased risk for colectomy (55% vs 7%; p<.1) Seow CH et al. Gut 21;59:49-54 Adalimumab in UC: Remission associated with higher adalimumab levels Sandborn WJ, et al Gastro 212;142:257 Management of Secondary Infliximab Failure Based on Serum Levels of Infliximab and Antibodies to Infiximab Patients with secondary infliximab failure (N=46) randomized to infliximab q4w or interventions based on combined infliximab and anti-infliximab serum concentrations Patients with anti-infliximab antibodies and low infliximab levels switched to adalimumab Patients without anti-infliximab antibodies and low infliximab levels were dose escalated Response rate 58% in algorithm group vs 53% in dose-escalation group v Algorithm p=.13 IFX q4 p<.1 p<.1 Steenholdt C et al. Abstract 94

Methods Prevalence and Impact of Antibodies to Adalimumab (UCSF) Antibodies to adalimumab (ATA), serum levels of adalimumab, symptoms, and CRP levels measured in 54 female IBD patients (2 with UC) Results Prevalence of detectable ATA was 22.2% Prevalence of detectable adalimumab concentration was 9.7% Serum concentration of <5 µg/ml of adalimumab associated with elevated CRP More active disease demonstrated in patients with low drug concentrations (<5 µg/ml) and/or detectable ATA (P=.1) Velayos FS et al. Abstract 49 Adalimumab levels correlate with mucosal healing Yarur AJ et al. Abstract Tu1147 Is Fecal Loss of Infliximab a Cause of Lack of Response to Treatment? Background Infliximab may be lost through leaky gut that is characteristic of the denuded and ulcerated mucosa in severe CD and UC Methods Repeated fecal samples collected from IBD patients within first 14 days of therapy Infliximab levels quantified in samples Patients Severe IBD (N=9; 3 with CD, 6 with UC) Results Infliximab could be detected in the feces of all patients Highest concentrations were measured in the first days after initiation of therapy In nonresponders (3/9), the amount of drug detected in the stool at the first day after infusion was significantly higher than in patients who had a clinical response (P=.24) Conclusion Non-response to infliximab associated with rapid clearance through stool (and high inflammatory burden) Brandse JF et al. Abstract 157

New targets and treatments SONIC: Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 26 Proportion of Patients (%) 1 8 6 4 2 Primary Endpoint P<.1 P=.6 P=.22 44.4 3.6 56.8 43% 52/17 75/169 96/169 AZA + placebo IFX + placebo IFX+ AZA Colombel J-F et al. N Engl J Med. 21 Apr 15;362(15):1383-95. Ustekinumab for Crohn s disease: blocks IL-12/IL-23 5 4 3 Clinical Response and Remission at Weeks 6 and 8 Placebo UST 1 mg/kg UST 3 mg/kg UST 6 mg/kg UST combined 2 1 Clinical Response Week 6 Clinical Response Week 8 Clinical Remission Week 6 Clinical Remission Week 8 (primary end point) *P<.5 Sandborn W, et al. N Engl J Med. 212 Oct 18;367(16):1519-28. 65

Vedomizumab in UC: Clinical Response, Remission, Mucosal Healing at 6 Weeks 5 45 4 35 3 % 25 2 15 1 5 47.1 P<.1 25.5 21.7 95% CI: 11.6, 31.7 Feagan B, et al. DDW212 Induction ITT Population Placebo Vedolizumab P=.9 16.9 5.4 P=.12 4.9 24.8 Clinical Response Clinical Remission Mucosal Healing 11.5 4.7, 18.3 16.1 6.4, 25.9 6 5 4 % 3 2 1 Vedolizumab in UC: Primary and Secondary Outcomes Through 52 Weeks, Maintenance ITT Population 15.9 *** *** 44.8 41.8 Clinical Response 23.8 *** 56.6 *** 56. *** 52. *** 51.6 Durable Clinical Response 19.8 Mucosal Healing 8.7 ** ** 24. 2.5 Durable Clinical Remission 13.9 Placebo VDZ Q8 wks VDZ Q4 wks * 31.4 *** 45.2 CS Free Remissions n: 72 7 73 26.1 29.1 32.8 28.5 32. 36.3 11.8 15.3 17.6 31.4 *P<.5 **P<.1 ***P<.1 Feagan B, et al. DDW212 Janus Kinase Pathway Janus kinase inhibitor Targets a specific intracellular signaling cascade-jak/stat pathway The JAK family binds multiple cytokine receptors including: IL2/IL4/IL7/IL9/IL12 (JAK3) IFNs Tofacitinib is JAK3 inhibitor used for psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. TNF, tumor necrosis factor; RA, rheumatoid arthritis Shuai K et al. Nat Rev Immunol. 23;11:9.

Phase 2 Study of Tofacitinib (CP-69,55), an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor, in Active Ulcerative Colitis Week 8 Sandborn W et al. N Engl J Med 212 Positioning New and Established Medications for IBD Induction of Remission/ Active Disease Maintenance of Remission Cyclosporine Vedolizumab Ustekinumab (CD) Anti-TNFs Tofacitinib Corticosteroids Vedolizumab Anti-TNFs MTX 6-MP/AZA