Triptans: Nonresponse, Recurrence, and Serious AEs for Many Patients

Similar documents
Richard B. Lipton, 1 Joel Saper, 2 Messoud Ashina, 3 David Biondi, 4 Suman Bhattacharya, 4 Joe Hirman, 5 Barbara Schaeffler, 4 Roger Cady 4

Rimegepant Pivotal Phase 3 Trial Results - Conference Call March 26, Biohaven

Promius Pharma, a subsidiary of Dr. Reddy s Laboratories, Princeton, NJ; 2 Vedanta Research, Chapel Hill, NC; 3

Advancing Innovative Therapies for Neurological Diseases

Broad and clinically important benefits beyond the initial registrational endpoints are now reported.

Lasmiditan (200 mg and 100 mg) Compared to Placebo for Acute Treatment of Migraine

ISSN doi: /head.13327

Joel R. Saper, 1 Richard B. Lipton, 2 David B. Kudrow, 3 Joe Hirman, 4 David W. Dodick, 5 Stephen Silberstein, 6 George Chakhava, 7 Jeff Smith 8

Research Submission. ISSN doi: /head Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Headache 2013 American Headache Society

Clinical Trials. Hans-Christoph Diener Senior Professor of Clinical Neuroscienes Medical Faculty University Duisburg-Essen Germany

Differentiating Migraine from Other Headache Types to Target Treatment Peter J. Goadsby, MD, PhD

1/25/2018 ARE CGRP ANTAGONISTS ANY BETTER THAN CURRENT EVIDENCE BASED TREATMENTS? Disclosures: Objectives: Headache Division

What is new in the migraine world! Modar Khalil Consultant neurologist Hull Royal Infirmary

abstract n engl j med 377;22 nejm.org November 30,

A LOOK AT CGRP INHIBITORS FOR MIGRAINE PREVENTION JUNE 2018

Disclosure. Learning Objectives 11/10/2017. The Best and Most Interesting Research from Last Year Cephalalgia

Disclosures. REPLENISH Trial: Objective and Design. Background Use of compounded bioidentical hormone therapy (CBHT) has become highly prevalent

Despite the widespread use of triptans ... REPORTS... Almotriptan: A Review of Pharmacology, Clinical Efficacy, and Tolerability

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 2. Clinical Research Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 3

...SELECTED ABSTRACTS...

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Editorial Team Conflict of Interest Statements

Advancing Innovative Therapies for Neurological Diseases

Faculty Disclosures. Learning Objectives. Acute Treatment Strategies

Per cent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxina treatment cycle: PREEMPT

Chronic Migraine in Primary Care. December 11 th, 2017 Werner J. Becker University of Calgary

Giancarlo Comi, M.D. On Behalf of the MS-LAQ-301 (ALLEGRO) Study Group. Assessment of oral laquinimod in preventing progression of Multiple Sclerosis

Disclosures. Triptans for Kids 5/16/13

2017 Eli Lilly and Company

Summary ID#7029. Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ

ARxCH. Annual Review of Changes in Healthcare. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptors and the Prevention of Migraines. Abstract

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Intravenous ketamine for subacute treatment of refractory chronic migraine: a case series

Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Migraine: Developing Drugs for Acute Treatment Guidance for Industry

UCNS Course A Review of ICHD-3b

BMS for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-Ranging Trial

Guidance for Industry Migraine: Developing Drugs for Acute Treatment

An Overview of MOH. ALAN M. Rapoport, M.D. Clinical Professor of Neurology The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles, California

Committed to Transforming the Treatment Paradigm for Migraine Prevention

Migraine much more than just a headache

The Journal of Headache and Pain

PROMISE 2 Top-Line Data Results January 8, 2018

Paradigm for Migraine Patients

Improving the detection of chronic migraine: Development and validation of Identify Chronic Migraine (ID-CM)

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

Rizatriptan vs. ibuprofen in migraine: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

PROMISE 1 Top-Line Data Results. June 27, 2017

Sponsor. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name. Agomelatine Therapeutic Area of Trial. Major depressive disorder Approved Indication

Advances in the Treatment of Migraine

Effects of TX-001HR on Uterine Bleeding Rates in Menopausal Women with Vasomotor Symptoms

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Setting The setting of the study was primary care. The economic study was conducted in the USA.

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Inhibitors as Preventive Treatments for Patients with Episodic or Chronic Migraine: Effectiveness and Value

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EULAR Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab as Monotherapy and in Combination with Methotrexate

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

ADVANCES IN MIGRAINE MANAGEMENT

6/20/2018. Chronic Migraine versus Chronic Pain: Similarities and Differences. Disclosure (36 months) Clinical Differences/Background

Committed to Transforming the Treatment Paradigm for Migraine Prevention

Eletriptan vs sumatriptan: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple migraine attack study

Dose: Metoclopramide -0.1 mg/kg (max 10 mg) IV, over 15 minutes

Identification of negative predictors of pain-free response to triptans: Analysis of the eletriptan database

Iris Manor, MD. UK Adult ADHD Network 4th Annual Congress London, England September 11, 2014

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Cirrhotic Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 EXPEDITION-1

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report R&D/04/900. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Novartis announces Phase III STRIVE data published in NEJM demonstrating significant and sustained efficacy of erenumab in migraine prevention

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report AI Addendum #1. Open-label Dosing Phase

Daniel Kassicieh, DO, FAAN

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC FORM 8-K

Update on Diagnosis and Management of Migraines

Supplementary Appendix

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

The best defense is a good offense. Optimizing the Acute Treatment of Migraine. Disclosures 11/10/2017

Immediate-release Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen M Abbreviated Clinical Study Report R&D/08/1020

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Migraine is a very common medical disorder

Sumatriptan Tablets, Nasal Spray (Imitrex), Nasal Powder (Onzetra Xsail), sumatriptan and naproxen sodium (Treximet tablets)

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

Sumatriptan Tablets, Nasal Spray (Imitrex), Nasal Powder (Onzetra Xsail), sumatriptan and naproxen sodium (Treximet tablets)

Richard B Lipton 1, Brian Grosberg 1, Richard P Singer 2, Starr H Pearlman 3, James V Sorrentino 4, John N Quiring 5 and Joel R Saper 6.

Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SAR ACT sarilumab Version number : 1 (electronic 1.0)

Current Migraine Treatment Therapy. Daniel Kassicieh, DO, FAAN

Regulatory Status FDA approved indication: Migranal Nasal Spray is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine headaches with or without aura (1).

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA;

Summary ID# Clinical Study Summary: Study F1J-MC-HMDV

Adult & Pediatric Patients. Stanford Health Care, Division Pain Medicine

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

Pharmacy Medical Necessity Guidelines: Migraine Medications

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Value of postmarketing surveillance studies in achieving a complete picture of antimigraine agents: using almotriptan as an example

Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended-Release Tablets M Clinical Study Report R&D/09/1109

Supplementary Appendix

10/13/17. Christy M. Jackson, MD Director, Dalessio Headache Center Scripps Clinic, La Jolla Clinical Professor, Neurosciences UCSD

DISCLOSURES FUNCTIONS OF THE HYPOTHALAMUS

Research Submission. ISSN doi: /head Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Migraine Diagnosis and Treatment: Results From the American Migraine Study II

Transcription:

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rimegepant 75 mg, an Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonist, for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Results from a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial, Study 302 Richard B. Lipton, MD 1,2,3 ; Vladimir Coric, MD 4 ; Elyse G. Stock, MD 4 ; David Stock, PhD 4 ; Beth A. Morris, BA 4 ; Timothy J. McCormack, BA 4 ; Marianne Frost, MA 4 ; Kimberly Gentile, BS 4 ; Gene M. Dubowchik, PhD 4 ; Charles M. Conway, PhD 4 ; Robert Croop, MD 4 1 Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; 2 Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; 3 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; 4 Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New Haven, CT, USA

Disclosures Biohaven Pharmaceuticals funded the study, was responsible for study oversight, and performed data management and analysis Richard B. Lipton, MD, serves on the editorial board of Neurology and Cephalalgia and as senior advisor to Headache but is not paid for his roles on Neurology or Headache. He has received research support from the NIH. He also receives support from the Migraine Research Foundation and the National Headache Foundation. He receives research grants from Allergan, Amgen, Dr. Reddy s Laboratories, and Novartis. He has reviewed for the NIA and NINDS and serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Autonomic Technologies, Avanir, Boston Scientific, CoLucid, Dr. Reddy s Laboratories, electrocore, Eli Lilly, eneura Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Teva, and Vedanta. He receives royalties from Wolff s Headache (8 th Edition, Oxford Press University, 2009) and Informa. He holds stock options in eneura Therapeutics and Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. All other authors are employed by and hold stock/stock options in Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Rimegepant is an investigational new drug, not approved or authorized for marketing in the U.S. or any country for any indication or treatment of any disease or condition. This material is being made available for informational purposes only. 2

Triptans: Nonresponse, Recurrence, and Serious AEs for Many Patients Serotonin 5-HT 1B/1D receptor agonists (triptans) have been the most widely prescribed acute treatment of migraine for decades 1 34% 30%-40% ~3.5 million Do not respond 2 Have attack recurrence 3 Contraindicated or use with caution 4,5 1. Loder E. NEJM. 2010;363:63-70.; 2. Lipton RB et al. Headache. 2017;57:1026-40.; 3. Cameron C et al. Headache. 2015;55 Suppl 4:221-35.; 4. Buse DC et al. Headache. 2017;57:31-44.; 5. Lipton RB et al. Headache. 2017;57:1507-21. 3

Study Design Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase 3 study Eligible subjects: At least 18 years of age At least a 1-year history of migraine (ICHD-3 beta 1 ) 2-8 migraine attacks of moderate or severe intensity per month Fewer than 15 days with headache per month (migraine or non-migraine) over the last 3 months Any preventive migraine medication had to be stable for at least 3 months Randomized to receive rimegepant 75 mg or placebo Instructed to treat a single migraine attack ICHD-3 beta. Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629-808. 4

Subject Demographics Characteristic Rimegepant 75 mg Placebo Total N=537 N=535 N=1072 Age, years (SD) 40.2 (11.9) 40.9 (12.1) 40.6 (12.0) Female, n (%) 479 (89.2) 472 (88.2) 951 (88.7) Body mass index, kg/m 2 (SD) 30.1 (7.9) 31.8 (8.5) 31.4 (8.2) Attacks per month, n (SD) 4.5 (1.9) 4.6 (1.8) 4.6 (1.8) Duration of untreated attacks, hr (SD) 32.0 (22.5) 32.9 (21.7) 32.5 (22.1) Historical MBS, n (%) Photophobia 316 (58.8) 303 (56.6) 619 (57.7) Phonophobia 79 (14.7) 90 (16.8) 169 (15.8) Nausea 142 (26.4) 142 (26.5) 284 (26.5) SD, Standard Deviation MBS, most bothersome symptom 5

Subject Disposition Rimegepant 75 mg Placebo Randomized 594 592 Received study treatment 543 543 Did not receive study treatment a 51 49 Completed acute phase 538 542 Discontinued a 5 1 Analyzed Safety 543 543 Modified intent-to-treat 537 535 a Most common reasons were lost to follow-up and no qualifying migraine attack 6

Superior to Placebo on Both Coprimary Efficacy Endpoints 70 60 Rimegepant Placebo N=537 N=535 Proportion of Subjects 50 40 30 20 10 19.6 P=0.0006 12.0 37.6 P<0.0001 25.2 0 Pain Freedom at 2 hours postdose Freedom from the MBS at 2 hours postdose MBS, most bothersome symptom 7

Significant Superiority on Key Secondary Endpoints Durability Evident from 2 through 48 Hours Endpoints Rimegepant 75 mg N=537, n (%) Placebo N=535, n (%) P-value a Photophobia-free at 2 hours b 183 (37.4) 106 (22.3) <0.0001 Phonophobia-free at 2 hours c 133 (36.7) 100 (26.8) 0.0039 Pain relief at 2 hours 312 (58.1) 229 (42.8) <0.0001 Nausea-free at 2 hours d 171 (48.1) 145 (43.3) 0.2084 Rescue medication within 24 hours 113 (21.0) 198 (37.0) <0.0001 Sustained pain-free, 2-24 hours 66 (12.3) 38 (7.1) 0.0040 Sustained pain relief, 2-24 hours 229 (42.6) 142 (26.5) <0.0001 Sustained pain-free, 2-48 hours 53 (9.9) 32 (6.0) 0.0181 Sustained pain relief, 2-48 hours 195 (36.3) 121 (22.6) <0.0001 Pain relapse from 2 to 48 hours e 52 (49.6) 32 (50.0) 0.9648 Ability to function normally at 2 hours 175 (32.6) 125 (23.4) 0.0007 Nausea-free at 3 hours d,f 209 (58.8) 167 (49.7) 0.0156 Sustained ability to function normally, 2-48 hours f 105 (19.6) 67 (12.5) 0.0016 Sustained freedom from the MBS, 2-48 hours f 112 (20.9) 65 (12.2) 0.0001 a Secondary endpoints were tested hierarchically in the order shown at P=0.05 b Rimegepant n=489, placebo n=477; c Rimegepant n=362, placebo n=374; d Rimegepant n=355, placebo n=336; e Rimegepant n=105, placebo n=64 f Exploratory endpoint 8

Pain Freedom with Single Dose: Increasing Benefit Over Time Pain Freedom 2-8 Hours Post-Single Dosing with Rimegepant 75 mg % of Patients Pain Free 100 80 60 40 20 Rimegepant 75 mg (n=537) Percent (%) difference versus placebo at each time point Placebo (n=535) Single Dose of Rimegepant, No Rescue Meds 48% 43% 37% 30% 20% 0 2 hr 3 hr 4 hr 6 hr 8 hr Time Pain Freedom represents subjects that report no pain at the timepoint of interest. Percentages represent Non-Completer = Failure (NC=F) estimates of pain freedom, and were based on the mitt population. 9

Greater Proportion of Subjects Achieving Pain Relief and Normal Function Without Additional Dosing or Rescue Medications Pain Relief up to 8 Hours Postdose Disability Freedom up to 8 Hours Postdose Pain Relief represents the first report of either mild pain or no pain. Probabilities are Kaplan-Meier estimates; subjects were censored (not included) at the time they took rescue medication or provided their last data point. Four-point scale: 0=normal function, 1=mild impairment, 2=severe impairment, 3=required bedrest Data are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the first report of Normal Function. Subjects were censored (not included) at the time they took rescue medication or provided their last data point. 10

Safety Profile Similar to Placebo Adverse Event Rimegepant 75 mg N = 543, n (%) Placebo N = 543, n (%) Subjects with AE 93 (17.1) 77 (14.2) AEs reported by 1% of subjects a Nausea 10 (1.8) 6 (1.1) Urinary tract infection 8 (1.5) 6 (1.1) AEs related to treatment 10 (1.8) 3 (.6) Serious AEs 1 (0.2) b 2 (0.4) AEs leading to discontinuation 0 0 AE, adverse event; a In either treatment group; b Back pain; unrelated to treatment 11

Liver Safety Liver Function Tests Rimegepant 75 mg N = 543, n (%) Placebo N = 543, n (%) Serum AST or ALT > ULN 13 (2.4) 12 (2.2) Serum AST or ALT > 3x ULN 0 0 Serum AST or ALT > 5x ULN 0 0 Bilirubin elevations > 2x ULN 0 0 AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; ULN, upper limit of normal 12

Conclusions Coprimary endpoints met Pain Freedom at 2 hours postdose Freedom From the Most Bothersome Symptom at 2 hours postdose Broad and clinically important drug benefit with single dose of rimegepant Majority of patients achieve Pain Relief Durability of benefit (24 and 48 hours) Lower use of rescue meds Greater proportion of patients achieving normal function Excellent safety profile similar to placebo including liver function tests Tolerability profile similar to placebo and favorable compared to historical triptan experience Consistent results across endpoints and all efficacy trials Phase 3 Study 301 is presented as a late-breaking poster (PS123LB) 13

Q & A

Thank You!