Demand Estimation Sub Committee. 14 th November 2005

Similar documents
BREATH AND BLOOD ALCOHOL STATISTICS

What are WAR bands? How and when are they derived? How can they be challenged? Page 1

Seasonality of influenza activity in Hong Kong and its association with meteorological variations

Analysis of Meter Reading Validation Tolerances proposed by Project Nexus

FGSZ Zrt. from 28 February 2019 till 29 February 2020 AUCTION CALENDAR: YEARLY YEARLY BUNDLED AT CROSS BORDER POINTS

UNC Unidentified Gas (UIG) Workgroup 28th January Xoserve UIG Task Force recommendations and discussion of next steps

Crisis Connections Crisis Line Phone Worker Training (Online/Onsite) Winter 2019

Alcohol & Drugs. Contents:

Project Nexus Workgroup AQ calculation. 7 th April 2015

Travel Time Reliability Summary

Blood Alcohol Levels for Fatally Injured Drivers

BLOOD ALCOHOL LEVELS FOR FATALLY INJURED DRIVERS

Overview of the Radiation Exposure Doses of the Workers at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

WAR Band Analysis Updated 01/03/2018. Xoserve Analytics Team

Weekly Influenza News 2016/17 Season. Communicable Disease Surveillance Unit. Summary of Influenza Activity in Toronto for Week 43

South Wales Street Based Lifestyle Monitor

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE GENERAL CUSTOMER BASELINE LOAD ( CBL ) Verification Methodology

Real World Variables University Wind Studies Part 1. Randy Montgomery

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 3: January 14 to January 20, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. 4 IRVING PLACE NEW YORK, NY 10003

Empowering Weight Loss Charts & Logs Healthy Weight Chart Cholesterol Chart Blood Pressure Chart Exercise Calorie Burning Chart

Project Nexus Workgroup Outstanding Areas Log - Closed

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 4: January 21 to January 27, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

8.0 Take Home Naloxone

Description +/- Balance Description +/- Balance

Hydrologic Modeling Workshop. HEC-5 Modeling of ACF Interim Operation by Mobile District

FORECASTING DEMAND OF INFLUENZA VACCINES AND TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS.

Referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times statistics for consultant-led elective care 2014 Annual Report

RTT Exception Report

FIDS Symposium The River Bender

18 Week 92% Open Pathway Recovery Plan and Backlog Clearance

Pre-hospital thrombolysis (PHT) Clinical Audit Report 30 th November 2007

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (MRSA and MSSA) Bi-annual Report. Surveillance: Report:

Curators of the University of Missouri - Combined January 01, 2013 through December 31, 2013 Cost Management Report

Annual Quantity (AQ) & Read processes. Lee Jackson / John Harris / Rachel Hinsley

PERFORMANCE AGAINST IMMUNISATION TIER 1 TARGETS

Martha s Vineyard. & Nantucket SteamshipAuthority.com 2017 FERRY SCHEDULE

Energy efficiency and renewable options for dairy farms

NILE RIVER WATER RESOURCES ANALYSIS

FORECASTING THE DEMAND OF INFLUENZA VACCINES AND SOLVING TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM USING LINEAR PROGRAMMING

Timetable detailed schedule Term 3 and

Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Situation Update. Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease surveillance summary

Business Requirements Definition. Project Nexus

Winter Holiday Suicide Myth Continues to be Reinforced in Press Annenberg Public Policy Center Study Finds

HEPATITIS A. Figure 35. Figure 36. Hepatitis A Incidence Rates by Year LAC and US,

Emergency Department (ED) Visits due to Drug Overdose. Montgomery County, OH January 1, 2016 December 31, 2016

Curators of the University of Missouri - Combined January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016

APPENDIX ONE. 1 st Appointment (Non-admitted) recovery trajectories

Online Supplement to A Data-Driven Model of an Appointment-Generated Arrival Process at an Outpatient Clinic

Welcome. Recreational Enhancements on the Lehigh River Public Information Workshop 31 January 2008

SHORT TERM HEALTH IMPACTS OF HIGH PM EPISODES ON THE BISHOP PAIUTE RESERVATION

Blood Supply and Wastage

Statistical Press Notice NHS referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times data November 2016

Breast Test Wales Screening Division Public Health Wales

South Plains Emergency Medical Services, Inc. P.O. Box Lubbock, Texas 79453

5. BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND FOOD VALUE OF RIBBON FISH L. SAVALA

INSIGHTS AND BEST PRACTICES FOR EMS AGENCIES

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. E. PMT Meeting #5

MAR Kumar (1-15) Williams (16-31) AUG Kumar (1-15) Williams (16-31) NOV Williams (1-15) Zelada (16-30) DEC Morey (1-15) Kumar (16-31)

Emergency Department Boarding of Psychiatric Patients in Oregon

Dementia Content Report January Produced By The NHS Choices Reporting Team

FAQs about Provider Profiles on Breast Cancer Screenings (Mammography) Q: Who receives a profile on breast cancer screenings (mammograms)?

The Runnymede Community Safety Partnership identified the following priorities at the start of the assessment period:

The Single Cancer Pathway

McLean ebasis plus TM

Towards impact based monitoring of Estrogenic Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (eedc).

Avian influenza in poultry, wild and captive birds (AI)

Sex Differences in Fitness Variance and the Evolution of Mating Systems II

Durham Region Influenza Bulletin: 2017/18 Influenza Season

The paper provides an update for the Trust Board on hospital mortality and presents the updated Trust Mortality Action Plan.

H1N1 FEARS EXAGGERATED SAY MANY CANADIANS LIBS TEN PERCENTAGE POINTS BEHIND TORIES

SALMONELLOSIS. 35 Cases per 100,000 LAC US

MICHIGAN PATHOLOGY QUALITY SYSTEM (MPQS)

Going with the Flow Update. An update and comparative analysis of five years of Water Sentinels flow data collection of the Upper Verde River

JOHN GEORGE PAVILION

Kansas EMS Naloxone (Narcan) Administration

31 days Wed Nov 15, Fri Dec 15, 2017 N/A. Hypoglycemia. Sensor usage (CGM) Mahlon's glucose data was in the target range about 77% of the day.

AUSTRALIAN BEEF EATING QUALITY INSIGHTS 2017

Dengue Surveillance and Response in Thailand

Sleep Market Panel. Results for June 2015

Don Pedro Project Project Operations/Water Balance Model Attachment B Model Description and User s Guide, Addendum 1 Base Case Description

GREENWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT PHYSICAL EDUCATION

An Updated Approach to Colon Cancer Screening and Prevention

Statistical Press Notice NHS referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times data July 2017

Telehealth Data for Syndromic Surveillance

REPLICATION DATA SET FOR:

EFFECT OF METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS ON POLLEN CONCENTRATION IN THE ATMOSPHERE OF ISLAMABAD

Progress Report March 2016

Reconciliation by Difference (RbD) - Initial thoughts

Statistical Press Notice NHS referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times data July 2018

SUPPLIER/MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE REPORT

8 Public Health Wales CDSC Weekly Influenza Surveillance Report Wednesday 21 August 2013 (covering week )

External Factors ( Drivers ) Affecting Long- Term Term Trends and Recent Pressures on Unscheduled Care Use and Performance in Wales

A Simple Regression Model for Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration in Various Types of Land Use, THAILAND

From Analytics to Action

Home sampling for STI tests in Greenwich: evaluation highlights. David Pinson Public Health & Well-Being Royal Borough of Greenwich

Cancer Alliance Data Pack

Impact of 2010 World Cup Soccer on Eskom Energy Sales. J C R Potgieter 22 July 2008

Current Python Science USGS and Collaborators

National Institute for Communicable Diseases -- Weekly Surveillance Report --

Transcription:

Demand Estimation Sub Committee 14 th November 2005

Agenda Changes to Cardiff weather station Backfilling history Within day relationship (National Grid) Algorithm Performance 2004/5 WCF and SF Gas year 2004/5 Replication of demand attribution

Creating a St. Athan weather history from Cardiff

Background Temperatures and wind speeds from Cardiff weather station are currently used to create the composite weather variable for Wales South. Cardiff weather station will cease operating in the first few days of 2006. St.Athan is the nearest weather station to Cardiff. St.Athan weather starts in October 1998. A St.Athan weather history starting in April 1928 is required for demand modelling purposes. This presentation shows the equations that will be used to convert the Cardiff weather history to a St.Athan weather history.

Location of St.Athan

St.Athan daily temperatures

St.Athan daily wind speeds

Backfilling Equations Daily Temperatures St.Athan = - 0.2009 + 0.9679 * Cardiff - 0.0587 * max(0, 7.5 - Cardiff) - 0.1438 * max(0, Cardiff - 15.6) Daily Wind Speeds St.Athan = 1.8638 + 0.9512 * Cardiff - 0.0846 * max(0, 6 - Cardiff)

National Grid Within Day Relationship

Algorithm Performance WCF and SF elements

Evaluation of performance Daily values of scaling factor and weather correction factor Figures 1-13 Tables 1-4 Reconciliation variance data for each EUC Daily consumption data collected from the NDM sample

Commentary WCF-EWCF values show that bias is slightly worse in 2004/5 for most LDZs, consistent with SND being slightly too high. Weekday 10 out of 13 Friday and Saturday 8 out of 13 Sunday 11 out of 13 SF values are better in about half all LDZs Average monthly RMSE shows variability has improved, also true for most LDZs SF volatility still evident during the summer in a number of LDZs, likely impacts are from the warm weather cut-offs in the models

WCF and SF patterns Two specific instances to highlight SC LDZ, two spikes in SF during May bank holiday days suggesting holiday demand reductions may be too high Last week of July in SC, NO, NW, NE, WM show volatile WCF-EWCF values with generally unusual SF plateau. Possibly due to demand models not adequately representing the very unsettled weather.

Weather Correction & Scaling Factor: SC 1.5 WCF- EWCF SF 1 0.5 0-0.5 Oct-03 Jan-04 Apr-04 Jul-04 Oct-04 Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05

Weather Correction & Scaling Factor: NO 1.5 1 WCF- EWCF SF 0.5 0-0.5 Oct-03 Jan-04 Apr-04 Jul-04 Oct-04 Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05

Equilibrium SF analysis Uses WCF-EWCF close to zero Tables 7 and 8 Weather corrected aggregate NDM demand close to aggregate NDM SND Tables 9 and 10 Allows assessment of equilibrium SF Can be compared to AQ movement in the LDZ

SC LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF October 100.6% 74.3% 0.005 1.04 0.008 December 99.8% 82.6% -0.084 1.04-0.003 January 100.5% 82.3% -0.096 1.04 0.005 Equilibrium level of SF: ~ 1.04 AQ ~4 % too low in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -0.1% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis change for SC: -2.6% new NDM AQs in aggregate could still be too low but October SF < 1

NO LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF December 100.0% 79.8% -0.094 1.03 0.000 Equilibrium level of SF: ~ 1.03 AQ ~3 % too low in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -2.3% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for NO: -4.8% new NDM AQs in aggregate could still be too low, but October SF < 1

NW LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF December 102.1% 82.9% -0.073 1.00 0.021 February 98.7% 82.6% -0.051 1.01-0.012 Equilibrium level of SF: 1.00 1.01 AQ broadly OK in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -4.8% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for NW: -4.5% new NDM AQs in aggregate could be broadly OK, but October SF < 1

NE LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF February 99.8% 79.2% -0.030 1.00-0.001 Equilibrium level of SF: ~ 1.00 AQ OK in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -2.3% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for NE: -4.2% new NDM AQs in aggregate could now be too high, October SF < 1

EM LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF December 100.1% 78.8% -0.071 1.02 0.001 February 99.6% 76.8% -0.035 1.02-0.004 Equilibrium level of SF: 1.02 AQ 2 % too low Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -3.1% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for EM: -4.2% new NDM AQs in aggregate could still be too low, but October SF < 1

WM LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF January 99.6% 87.8% -0.159 1.01-0.003 Equilibrium level of SF: ~ 1.01 AQ slightly too low in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -5.4% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for WM: -6.0% new NDM AQs in aggregate could be broadly OK, but October SF < 1

WN LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF November 99.6% 71.8% -0.080 1.10-0.002 Equilibrium level of SF: ~ 1.10 AQ ~10 % too low in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -4.7% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for WN: -4.4% new NDM AQs in aggregate still too low, but October SF now closer to 1 Note: WN LDZ is impacted by some supply points that should be in WN, being assigned to adjacent LDZs. WN is much smaller than adjacent LDZs and is affected to a greater extent.

WS LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF December 100.0% 69.8% -0.053 1.01 0.000 Equilibrium level of SF: 1.01 AQ slightly too low Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -2.8% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for WS: -2.9% new NDM AQs in aggregate could be broadly OK, October SF ~ 1

EA LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF December 100.3% 86.3% -0.069 1.02 0.003 Equilibrium level of SF: 1.02 AQ 2 % too low in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -5.3% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for EA: -6.2% new NDM AQs in aggregate may still be too low, BUT October SF << 1 which suggests the opposite

NT LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF November 99.5% 86.6% -0.087 0.99-0.004 January 100.8% 88.5% -0.136 1.00 0.009 Equilibrium level of SF: ~ 0.99 1.00 AQ OK or slightly too high in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -5.7% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for NT: -5.9% new NDM AQs in aggregate could be broadly OK, but October SF < 1

SE LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF December 101.5% 82.1% -0.058 0.98 0.015 March 99.5% 80.4% -0.110 0.98-0.006 Equilibrium level of SF: ~ 0.98 2004/05 AQ 2 % too high in Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -6.1% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for SE: -6.3% new NDM AQs in aggregate could still be too high, October SF < 1

SO LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF December 99.4% 86.3% -0.077 1.04-0.006 January 100.4% 86.8% -0.158 1.04 0.004 Equilibrium level of SF: ~1.04 AQ ~ 4% too low in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -6.2% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for SO: -6.9% new NDM AQs in aggregate could be still be too low, October SF close to 1

SW LDZ 2004/05 Month Agg. WC NDM as % of Agg. NDM SND Agg WC NDM as % of Agg. WC LDZ Average WCF Average SF WCF - EWCF November 100.8% 84.2% -0.071 1.01 0.010 December 99.1% 86.4% -0.080 1.01-0.009 January 99.1% 86.3% -0.154 1.01-0.009 Equilibrium level of SF: 1.01 AQ slightly too low in 2004/05 Agg. NDM AQ change for new gas year: -4.1% Seasonal Normal Weather Basis Change for SE: -5.3% new NDM AQs in aggregate could be broadly OK, but October SF < 1

Any Questions?

Replication of Demand Attribution Gas year 2004/5

Demand Attribution Gas Year 2004/5 Full year continuation of the part year presented in March Based on 2004/5 models using revised CWV and SNCWVs All EUCs re-modelled for the all LDZs with revised new basis CWVs and with new seasonal normal weather Models for data sets (analysis years) 2001/02, 2002/03 and 2003/04 (these 3 years were originally used for the smoothed model for the 2004/05 EUC profiles - the previous gas year) Smoothed models on new basis, created for gas year 2004/05 and relevant parameters computed (e.g. ALPs, DAFs, etc)

Demand Attribution Gas Year 2004/5 (2) Inevitably different modelling outcomes apply: e.g. whether cut-offs and summer reductions apply AQs adjusted to new basis using AQ factors computed from smoothed EUC models Demand attribution replicated for gas year 2004/05 on this new basis Results compared with results of actual demand attribution over 2004/05 WCF-EWCFs SFs RMS deviations of SF from 1

NDM Demand Attribution - Gas Year 2004/05 - Caveats AQ adjustment based on factors Underlying modelling is different New CWV definitions based on best overall fit to a range of years Underlying adjustments to the load levels of the constituent consumption bands of the revised basis aggregate NDM demand model are also based on the AQ factors

Demand Attribution: SF & WCF for LDZ: NE 1.5 1 WCF- EWCF SF 0.5 0-0.5 Oct-04 Dec-04 Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05 Aug-05 Black is current basis; Red is revised basis

Demand Attribution: SF & WCF for LDZ: NT 1.5 WCF- EWCF SF 1 0.5 0-0.5 Oct-04 Dec-04 Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05 Aug-05 Black is current basis; Red is revised basis

Demand Attribution: SF & WCF for LDZ: SO 1.5 WCF- EWCF SF 1 0.5 0-0.5 Oct-04 Dec-04 Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05 Aug-05 Black is current basis; Red is revised basis

Demand Attribution: Average Values of SFs GY 2004/05 - Differences LDZ Mon-Thur Friday Saturday Sunday Winter Summer SC 0.003-0.008-0.010-0.007 0.008-0.011 NO 0.008-0.001 0.000 0.007 0.009 0.001 NW -0.017-0.014 0.001 0.003-0.010-0.034 NE -0.011 0.007 0.006 0.007-0.007-0.005 EM -0.002-0.002-0.005 0.001-0.003-0.004 WM 0.002 0.003 0.002-0.001 0.006-0.002 WN 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.015-0.001 WS 0.015 0.008 0.015 0.015-0.003 0.031 EA 0.002-0.001-0.004-0.004 0.003 0.008 NT 0.000-0.004 0.004 0.005 0.001 0.005 SE -0.004-0.003 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.000 SO 0.011 0.012 0.002 0.010 0.003 0.016 SW 0.004 0.006 0.003 0.012 0.005 0.005 Better Worse

Demand Attribution: Average Values of WCF EWCF GY 2004/05 - Differences LDZ Mon-Thur Friday Saturday Sunday Winter Summer SC -0.008-0.017-0.018-0.017-0.005-0.019 NO 0.009-0.004 0.004 0.010-0.011 0.024 NW 0.019 0.007-0.011-0.001 0.014 0.044 NE -0.005 0.005 0.003 0.001 0.012-0.021 EM -0.003-0.012-0.018-0.002 0.017 0.005 WM 0.003-0.007-0.006 0.000-0.010 0.009 WN 0.000-0.006-0.002 0.001-0.001-0.001 WS -0.001-0.013-0.004-0.005-0.002 0.016 EA -0.008-0.010-0.012-0.012 0.008-0.007 NT 0.000-0.013-0.006-0.004-0.016 0.009 SE 0.004-0.001-0.004-0.013 0.015 0.022 SO 0.008 0.005-0.002 0.007-0.008 0.031 SW 0.002-0.002-0.001 0.009-0.009 0.013

Gas Year 2004/05 Demand Attribution Results Broad Conclusions Seasonal SF effects less evident On the whole slightly improved SF behaviour (e.g. better weekday and weekend averages, except Friday) Less SF volatility (RMS deviations of SF from 1 improved in most months/ldz) In most cases (weekdays, weekends) WCF bias is not as good (except in summer) - adjusting aggregate NDM demand model constituent contributions using AQ factors may have played a part Differences may also be due to: weekend effects modelling outcomes on new basis summer fit of new CWVs (e.g. NW)