Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 21: Online April 18, 2014 doi: /atcs.oa Original Article

Similar documents
Mechanism of and Risk Factors for Reoperation After Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?

Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease

Quality Outcomes Mitral Valve Repair

Which Type of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation Accompanying Mitral Valve Disease Should Be Surgically Treated?

The operative mortality rate after redo valvular operations

Severe left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: should we operate?

Clinical material and methods. Fukui Cardiovascular Center, Fukui, Japan

Persistent Tricuspid Regurgitation After Tricuspid Annuloplasty During Redo Valve Surgery Affects Late Survival and Valve-Related Events

The risk-benefit ratio of mitral valve operation is

Chronic Primary Mitral Regurgitation

What is the Role of Surgical Repair in 2012

Repair or Replacement

How does Pulmonary Hypertension Affect the Decision to Intervene in Mitral Valve Disease? NO DISCLOSURE

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 42, No. 3, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /03/$30.

The Edge-to-Edge Technique f For Barlow's Disease

Late Outcome of Tricuspid Annuloplasty Using a Flexible Band/Ring for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

Mitral Valve prolapse: What s new? Which indications of early surgery? Input of new 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines. Christophe Tribouilloy Amiens, France

Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: Comparison of long-term survival and complications

Prof. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM

Clinical material and methods. Copyright by ICR Publishers 2007

Risk Analysis of the Long-Term Outcomes of the Surgical Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defects

Bicuspid aortic root spared during ascending aorta surgery: an update of long-term results

Presenter Disclosure. Patrick O. Myers, M.D. No Relationships to Disclose

Valvular Guidelines: The Past, the Present, the Future

A Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision

Exercise Pulmonary Hypertension predicts the Occurrence of Symptoms in Asymptomatic Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral Valve Disease, When to Intervene

Long-term results (22 years) of the Ross Operation a single institutional experience

Three-Dimensional P3 Tethering Angle at the Heart of Future Surgical Decision Making in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Etiology and Natural History of Disease and Triggers for Intervention

Preoperative Parameters Predicting the Postoperative Course of Endoventricular Circular Patch Plasty

Surgical repair techniques for IMR: future percutaneous options?

Primary Mitral Regurgitation

THE FOLDING LEAFLET. Rafael García Fuster. Cardiac Surgery Department University General Hospital of Valencia

Primary Mitral Valve Disease: Natural History & Triggers for Intervention ACC Latin American Conference 2017

Effect of Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation After Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Late secondary TR after left sided heart disease correction: is it predictibale and preventable

ECHO HAWAII. Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease. Not only ischemia! Cardiomyopathy. Prosthetic Valve. Diastolic Dysfunction

Management of Tricuspid Regurgitation

Influence of Atrial Fibrillation on Outcome Following Mitral Valve Repair

Transcatheter Echo Guided Mitral Valve Repair with NeoChord Implantation: Results from NeoChord Independent International Registry

Overview of Surgical Approach to Mitral Valve Disease : Why Repair? Steven F. Bolling, MD Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Χειρουργική Αντιμετώπιση της Ανεπάρκειας της Μιτροειδούς Βαλβίδας

Kinsing Ko, Thom de Kroon, Najim Kaoui, Bart van Putte, Nabil Saouti. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

16 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 6900

Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease. Very Long-Term Survival and Durability of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Valve Prolapse

Long term outcomes of posterior leaflet folding valvuloplasty for mitral valve regurgitation

Isolated Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Depressed Left Ventricular Function

Clinical Outcome of Tricuspid Regurgitation. David Messika-Zeitoun

CLINICAL COMMUNIQUE 16 YEAR RESULTS

Basic Principles of Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair Technical Aspects and Results. Manuel Antunes Coimbra-Portugal

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

De Vega Annuloplasty for Functional Tricupsid Regurgitation: Concept of Tricuspid Valve Orifice Index to Optimize Tricuspid Valve Annular Reduction

The benefits of mitral valve reconstruction for operative

Introduction. Study Design. Background. Operative Procedure-I

Reshape/Coapt: do we need more? Prof. J Zamorano Head of Cardiology University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid

Supplementary Appendix

(Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:845 53)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased morbidity

Incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients receiving mitral Biocor porcine prosthetic valves

Predicting functional mitral stenosis after restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair: What Can We Treat and What Should We Treat

DECISION MAKING DEL CARDIOCHIRURGO NELL INSUFFICIENZA MITRALICA: ISTRUZIONI D USO D CARDIOLOGO

Les valvulopathies en sourdine: la valve mitrale Quoi faire devant une régurgitation mitrale sévère asymptomatique de type dégénérative?

When should we intervene surgically in pediatric patient with MR?

Gonçalo F. Coutinho, Ana Luís Garcia, Pedro M. Correia, Carlos Branco and Manuel J. Antunes*

Disclosures. ESC Munich 2012 Bernard Iung, MD Consultancy: Abbott Boehringer Ingelheim Bayer Servier Valtech

Surgical AF Ablation : Lesion Sets and Energy Sources. What are the data? Steven F Bolling, MD Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC, FRCS (Glasgow), FACC, FESC President of Saudi Heart Association King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Surgical repair of massive dilatation of the right atrium with tricuspid regurgitation

J Cardiovasc Med 2012, 13: Received 19 October 2011 Revised 8 November 2011 Accepted 29 November 2011

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Monitoring Patients and Detecting Complications

Organic mitral regurgitation

Indication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI

A good surgical option for ischemic mitral regurgitation in co-morbid patients: semicircular reduction annuloplasty

The production of murmurs is due to 3 main factors:

Mitral Valve Repair for 52 Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Management of Incomplete Initial Repair in the Treatment of Degenerative Mitral Insufficiency An Institutional Protocol and Mid-Term Outcomes

Valve Disease in Patients With Heart Failure TAVI or Surgery? Miguel Sousa Uva Hospital Cruz Vermelha Lisbon, Portugal

Bogdan A. Popescu. University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania. EAE Course, Bucharest, April 2010

Clinical outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair: a single-center experience in Korea

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Importance of the third arterial graft in multiple arterial grafting strategies

Results of Mitral Valve Replacement, with Special Reference to the Functional Tricuspid Insufficiency

Pay Attention to Valvular Disease in the Presence of Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Under Treatment of Concomitant AF Vinay Badhwar, MD

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz

Expanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated?

Repair of Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defects Single Patch Technique

Eiki Tayama, Satoshi Fujita, Tomohiro Ueda, Ken-ich Imasaka, Naofumi Enomoto, Hirofumi Onitsuka, and Yukihiro Tomita. 2. Case Report. 1.

MATRIX VHD FORM. State the name of the patient ( Product Recipient ) for whom you are providing the information contained in this form.

The Ins and Outs of Cardiac Surgery. Stephanie Wold RN MN NP

MitraClip in the ICCU: Which Patient will Benefit?

Really Less-Invasive Trans-apical Beating Heart Mitral Valve Repair: Which Patients?

Posterior leaflet prolapse is the most common lesion seen

Steven F Bolling Professor of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Asymptomatic Valvular Disease:

Risk Factors for Development of Tricuspid Regurgitation after Heart Transplantation and Long-term Outcome of Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Surgical Mininvasive Approach for Mitral Repair Prof. Mauro Rinaldi

Transcription:

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 21: 53 58 Online April 18, 2014 doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.13-00364 Original Article The Impact of Preoperative and Postoperative Pulmonary Hypertension on Long-Term Surgical Outcome after Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Takashi Murashita, MD, Yukikatsu Okada, MD, PhD, Hideo Kanemitsu, MD, PhD, Naoto Fukunaga, MD, Yasunobu Konishi, MD, Ken Nakamura, MD, and Tadaaki Koyama, MD, PhD Purpose: The aim of this study is to elucidate the impact of preoperative and postoperative pulmonary hypertension (PH) on long-term clinical outcomes after mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Methods: A total of 654 patients who underwent mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation between 1991 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into PH(+) group (137 patients) and PH( ) group (517 patients). Follow-up was complete in 99.0%. The median follow-up duration was 7.5 years. Results: Patients in PH(+) group were older, more symptomatic and had higher tricuspid regurgitation grade. Thirty-day mortality was not different between 2 groups (p = 0.975). Long-term survival rate was lower in PH(+) group; 10-year survival rate after the operation was 85.2% ± 4.0% in PH(+) group and 89.7% ± 1.8% in PH( ) group (Log-rank, p = 0.019). The incidence of late cardiac events were not different between groups, however, the recurrence of PH was more frequent in PH(+) group. The recurrence of PH had an adverse impact on survival rate, late cardiac events and symptoms. Univariate analysis showed age and preoperative tricuspid regurgitation grade were the predictors of PH recurrence. Conclusion: Early surgical indication should be advocated for degenerative mitral regurgitation before the progression of pulmonary hypertension and tricuspid regurgitation. Keywords: pulmonary hypertension, mitral valve repair, degenerative mitral regurgitation Introduction Pulmonary hypertension (PH) may occur with the gradual progression of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan Received: December 12, 2013; Accepted: January 24, 2014 Corresponding author: Takashi Murashita, MD. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatozimaminami, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan Email: tmurashita@gmail.com 2015 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights reserved. with mitral valve (MV) prolapse and the presence of PH has been reported to have negative impact on operative outcomes. 1 6) Current American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association guideline states that mitral valve surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR, preserved left ventricular function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 50 mmhg at rest or greater than 60 mmhg with exercise) as a class IIa indication based on level C evidence. 7) Recently, Ghoreishi, et al. reported that preoperative PH adversely affected operative mortality, morbidity and long-term death. 8) They insisted that MV surgery should be referred before systolic pulmonary artery pressure Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 21, No. 1 (2015) 53

Murashita T, et al. exceeds 40 mmhg. However, their data did not report the impact of postoperative residual PH on long-term outcomes such as freedom from heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or symptoms. Pulmonary hypertension is expected to improve after successful treatment for left-sided valve disease. On the other hand, Goldstone, et al. reported residual PH was common after MV repair for degenerative disease and was associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity. 9) Thus the impact of preoperative and postoperative PH on surgical outcomes still remains unclear, which leads to the situation where PH cannot be a strong indicator for surgery. The aim of this study is to elucidate the impact of preoperative PH on long-term survival and cardiac functions after MV repair for degenerative MR. We also investigated the impact of postoperative residual and recurrent PH on late cardiac events and symptoms. Methods The data analysis for this retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital and the Board waived the need for patients consent. Patient population From January 1991 to December 2010, 1138 patients underwent mitral valve surgery (949 mitral valve repair and 169 mitral valve replacement) at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital. Among patients who underwent mitral valve repair, 247 patients (26.0%) who had type I or III MR were excluded. Patients who had congenital MR as well as patients who underwent concomitant procedures for aortic valve were also excluded. As a result, 654 patients who had type II, degenerative mitral regurgitation, remained. We retrospectively analyzed these patients. Definitions Preoperative systolic pulmonary artery pressure (spap) was measured with Doppler echocardiography (modified Bernoulli equation: 4 [tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity] 2 + right atrial pressure [10 mmhg]). We defined the pulmonary hypertension (PH) as spap more than 50 mmhg according to the guideline s cutline value. 7) We divided the patients who had preoperative PH [PH(+) group: 137 patients] and who did not have PH [PH( ) group: 517 patients]. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were defined as cardiac death, readmission for cardiac reasons, myocardial infarction, stroke and transient ischemic attack. Surgical techniques We approached through median sternotomy in all patients. Standard cardiopulmonary bypass techniques were used, including bicaval cannulation. Myocardial protection was achieved with antegrade and retrograde intermittent cold blood cardioplegia. A left atrial incision was applied in most patients. The techniques of mitral valve repair were described by Carpentier 10) and David and colleagues. 11) Prolapse of the posterior leaflet was mostly corrected by resection and suture of mitral leaflets. Prolapse of the anterior leaflet was mostly corrected by chordal replacement with polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex; W.L. Gore and Associates Inc., Flagstaff, Arizona, USA) sutures. The concomitant procedures were performed in 243 patients (37.2%). The details of surgical procedures are shown in Table 1. Follow-up examinations and management We followed up the patients at the outpatient clinic or with a telephone survey, and the follow-up was completed in 648 patients (99.0%). The median follow-up duration was 7.5 years. Postoperative echocardiographic follow-up was generally performed before discharge and at the outpatient clinic at 1, 5, 10 years after the operation. The median length of the echocardiographic followup was 5.5 years. Follow-up echocardiographic data was obtained in 129 patients at 1 year, in 88 patients at 5 years and in 57 patients at 10 years after the operation. Statistical analysis The continuous data in this study are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and range. Categorical variables were compared with the χ 2 or Fisher s exact tests, and continuous variables were compared with unpaired t or Wilcoxon tests. Survival and freedom from events were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. An univariate Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify predictors for late moderate TR. Statistical analysis was performed with StatView (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). Results Preoperative patient characteristics The patients characteristics and preoperative echocardiographic data are shown in Table 2. Of note, patients 54 Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 21, No. 1 (2015)

Pulmonary Hypertension at Mitral Valve Repair Table 1 Details of surgical procedure Operative procedure for mitral valve N = 654 Leaflet resection and suture, n (%) 548 (83.8%) Artificial chordal reconstruction, n (%) 296 (45.3%) Folding plasty, n (%) 59 (9.0%) Auto-pericardial patch, n (%) 30 (4.6%) Ring annuloplasty, n (%) 576 (88.1%) Concomitant procedures Tricuspid annuloplasty 162 (19.3%) Maze procedure, n (%) 87 (13.3%) Coronary artery bypass grafting, n (%) 35 (5.4%) Closure of ASD or PFO, n (%) 34 (5.2%) Cardiopulmonary bypass time, min 147 ± 48 Aortic cross-clamp time, min 104 ± 36 ASD: atrial septal defect; PFO: patent foramen ovale in PH(+) group were older, more symptomatic, and had higher grade of functional tricuspid regurgitation. Survival Thirty-day mortality occurred in 2 patients of PH(+) group (1.5%) and 5 patients of PH( ) group (1.0%), which was not different between 2 groups (p = 0.975). The overall long-term survival rate was better in PH( ) group; 5-year survival rate after the operation was 92.8% ± 2.3% in PH(+) group and 96.2% ± 0.9% in PH( ) group, 10-year survival rate after the operation was 85.2 %± 4.0% in PH(+) group and 89.7% ± 1.8% in PH( ) group (Log-rank, p = 0.019). There were 20 late deaths in PH(+) group, of which 9 were cardiac-related. The leading cause of cardiac death was stroke. There were 42 late deaths in PH( ) group, about half of which were cardiac-related. The leading cause of late death was also stroke (Table 3). Late major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events The freedom rate from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was lower in PH(+) group, however, it was not different significantly; 5-year freedom rate after the operation was 90.9% ± 2.7% in PH(+) group and 92.6% ± 1.2% in PH( ) group, 10-year freedom rate after the operation was 83.0% ± 4.2% in PH(+) group and 84.7% ± 2.1% in PH( ) group (Log-rank, p = 0.262). Postoperative residual and recurrent PH In PH(+) group, 2 patients (1.5%) showed residual PH (>50 mmhg) at discharge. The preoperative spap of these patients were 80 and 98 mmhg. In PH( ) group, there was no residual PH at discharge. During the follow-up period, 8 of PH(+) patients and 7 of PH ( ) patients showed recurrent PH (>50 mmhg). The freedom rate from recurrent PH was significantly lower in PH(+) group; 5-year freedom rate after the operation was 94.4% ± 2.5% in PH(+) group and 98.4% ± 0.8% in PH( ) group, 10-year freedom rate after the operation was 90.7% ± 3.5% in PH(+) group and 98.0% ± 0.9% in PH( ) group (Log-rank, p = 0.003). The survival rate and freedom rate from congestive heart failure were significantly lower in patients with recurrent PH than in patients without recurrent PH (Fig. 1). A total of 10 out of 15 patients who revealed recurrent PH fell into atrial fibrillation at follow-up. The latest New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was higher in the patients who revealed recurrent PH than the patients who did not (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4, p <0.001). Predictors of PH recurrence An univariate analysis was performed to determine the predictors of postoperative PH recurrence. Age and preoperative TR grade became the predictors for postoperative PH recurrence. Preoperative spap, left ventricular dilatation, left ventricular function, atrial fibrillation, left atrial diameter and postoperative recurrence of severe mitral regurgitation did not become the predictors (Table 4). Discussion Preoperative PH is reported to be a major risk factor for right ventricular failure and perioperative mortality undergoing mitral valve surgery. 12 14) Ghoreishi, et al. also reported that operative mortality after mitral valve operation for mitral regurgitation was correlated with the degree of preoperative PH. 8) In this study, we focused on the impact of preoperative PH after mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. We defined PH as spap more than 50 mmhg according to the guideline s cutline value. Patients in PH(+) group were older, more symptomatic, had higher TR grade, and higher effective regurgitant orifice than PH( ) group. Left ventricular function and incidence of atrial fibrillation were similar between 2 groups, which was different from the previous study. 8) In this study, the 30-day mortality was 1.5% in PH(+) group and 1.0% in PH( ) group (1.0%), which was not different between 2 groups (p = 0.975). Ghoreishi, et al. made a subgroup analysis of 284 patients who had Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 21, No. 1 (2015) 55

Murashita T, et al. Table 2 Preoperative clinical characteristics Variables PH+ (n = 137) PH (n = 517) p value Mean age, year 61.9 ± 14.5 55.0 ± 14.4 <0.001 Male, n (%) 74 (54.0%) 311 (60.2%) 0.194 BSA, m 2 1.53 ± 0.21 1.62 ± 0.20 <0.001 Hypertension, n (%) 65 (47.4%) 186 (36.0%) 0.014 Ischemic heart disease, n (%) 11 (8.0%) 28 (5.4%) 0.251 History of cardiac operation, n (%) 2 (1.5%) 6 (1.2%) 0.878 Urgent/Emergent operation, n (%) 3 (2.2%) 2 (0.4%) 0.109 Chronic atrial fibrillation, n (%) 39 (28.5%) 119 (23.0%) 0.185 Active bacterial endocarditis, n (%) 3 (2.2%) 15 (2.9%) 0.874 History of cardiac failure, n (%) 68 (49.6%) 154 (29.8%) <0.001 NYHA functional class I, n (%) 2 (1.5%) 10 (1.9%) 0.992 II, n (%) 84 (61.3%) 387 (74.9%) 0.002 III, n (%) 41 (29.9%) 104 (20.1%) 0.014 IV, n (%) 10 (7.3%) 16 (3.1%) 0.025 Prolapse region anterior, n (%) 9 (6.6%) 67 (13.0%) 0.038 posterior, n (%) 85 (62.0%) 261 (50.5%) 0.016 both, n (%) 43 (31.4%) 189 (36.5%) 0.261 LVDd, mm 55.5 ± 6.5 55.4 ± 6.9 0.835 LVDs, mm 33.7 ± 6.5 34.0 ± 6.8 0.709 LVEF, % 68.4 ± 7.3 66.1 ± 8.0 0.004 LAD, mm 49.6 ± 9.5 45.8 ± 9.1 <0.001 Regurgitant volume, ml 80.8 ± 53.3 73.5 ± 69.3 0.308 Regurgitant fraction, % 50.6 ± 29.8 45.9 ± 28.9 0.133 Effective regurgitant orifice, cm 2 0.47 ± 0.68 0.36 ± 0.43 0.030 TR grade mild or less, n (%) 49 (35.8%) 430 (83.2%) <0.001 moderate, n (%) 60 (43.8%) 65 (12.6%) <0.001 severe, n (%) 28 (20.4%) 22 (4.2%) <0.001 PH: pulmonary hypertension; BSA: body surface area; NYHA: New York Heart Association; LVDd: left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVDs: left ventricular systolic diameter; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LAD: left atrial diameter; TR: tricuspid regurgitation isolated degenerative mitral regurgitation. 8) They reported that operative mortality was 0.8% in that population, which was similar with our result. Our results and their study showed preoperative PH did not make a significant impact on operative mortality among the patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. On the other hand, Goldstone, et al. reported residual PH, not a preoperative PH, was a significant risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity. 9) They reported that 46% of the patients had residual PH after mitral valve repair. In our study, residual PH at discharge was only seen in 2 patients (1.5%) in PH(+) group. The difference may be due to the definition of residual PH and timing of measurement of PAP. Goldstone, et al. defined residual PH as mean PAP of 25 mmhg and they measured PAP on postoperative day 1. However, our study showed that PAP decreased greatly by discharge after successful repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation and incidence of residual PH defined as spap 50 mmhg was rare. Ghoreishi, et al. also spap was also a predictor for late death. 8) They demonstrated that long-term survival progressively decreased with increasing preoperative spap grade. The subgroup analysis for isolated degenerative mitral regurgitation also revealed that preoperative spap became a predictor of decreased long-term survival. Our study showed the long-term survival rate was worse in PH(+) group, which was compatible with previous studies. The previous study, however, did not demonstrate the causes of late death. We could detect most of the causes of late death, about half of which were cardiac. The leading cause of late death was stroke. The late 56 Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 21, No. 1 (2015)

Pulmonary Hypertension at Mitral Valve Repair Table 3 Details of late death PH(+) group (n = 20) n Cardiac 9 (50%) Stroke 6 Arrhythmia 2 Congestive heart failure 1 Non-cardiac 9 (50%) PH( ) group (n = 42) Cardiac 20 (48%) Stroke 12 Operative death at subsequent 3 Re-operation Congestive heart failure 2 Other 3 Non-cardiac 19 (45%) Unknown 3 (7%) Fig. 1 The overall survival rate after mitral valve repair in patients with recurrent pulmonary hypertension (PH) and without recurrent PH (A) and the freedom rate from congestive heart failure after mitral valve repair in patients with recurrent PH and without recurrent PH (B). death was prominent in the patients who had recurrence of PH. In this setting, most of these patients were suffered from atrial fibrillation and some of them revealed stroke despite warfarin therapy. During the follow-up period, 8 of PH(+) patients and 7 of PH( ) patients showed postoperative PH recurrence. PH recurrence was more seen in the patients with preoperative PH. Goldstone, et al. reported that residual PH was associated with postoperative complications, however, not associated with late survival. In contrast, in our study, the recurrence of PH had an adverse impact on Table 4 Predictors of postoperative PH recurrence Variables Odds ratio 95% CI p-value Age 1.081 1.007 1.160 0.031 Pre TR grade 3.690 1.637 8.322 0.002 Pre spap 1.022 0.985 1.048 0.167 Pre LVDd 1.029 0.403 2.627 0.953 Pre LVEF 0.953 0.981 1.023 0.186 Pre atrial fibrillation 0.953 0.258 3.521 0.943 Pre LA diameter 0.863 0.689 3.161 0.705 Post MR recurrence 1.569 0.221 23.33 0.996 PH: pulmonary hypertension; TR: tricuspid regurgitation; spap: systolic pulmonary artery pressure; LVDd: left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LA: left atrium; MR: mitral regurgitation survival rate and late cardiac events. It also adversely affected the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and patients symptoms. Most of the patients were suffered from atrial fibrillation and the NYHA functional class was higher in the patients with PH recurrence than without. The prediction and prevention of late recurrence of PH should be important. An univariate analysis showed that age and preoperative TR grade were the predictors of PH recurrence. Interestingly, preoperative pulmonary artery pressure and postoperative MR recurrence were not associated with PH recurrence. Three principal mechanisms are implicated in the development of PH in the setting of mitral valve disease. (1) passive retrograde transmission of elevated left atrial pressure resulting from mitral disease; (2) reactive pulmonary vasoconstriction; and (3) pulmonary vascular remodeling. The first point should be eliminated in the patients who underwent successful mitral surgery. So the compliance of pulmonary vascular component should be related to postoperative PH recurrence. Patients with high age and high preoperative TR grade are estimated to have poor compliance of pulmonary vascular component, which would lead to pulmonary vascular remodeling. In these patients, pulmonary vasodilators, including bosentan, nitric oxide, sildenafil and epoprostenol might be useful adjuncts. We have not experienced these products yet, though. Targeted postoperative optimization therapy should be studied further, because it could reduce the incidence of PH recurrence and its adverse effect of postoperative course. The limitations of our study included its retrospective method and the difference of preoperative patients characteristics. The small sample of patients and incomplete clinical and echocardiographic are also limitations. We Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 21, No. 1 (2015) 57

Murashita T, et al. calculated PAP by Bernoulli equation, which may be different from the real PAP measured by right heart catheterization. In conclusion, both preoperative PH and postoperative PH recurrence adversely affected clinical outcomes after mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitaiton. In the current guideline, PH is classified as class II indication. If patients were referred for early surgery, they would be less likely to experience irreversible pulmonary vascular remodeling. We believe early surgical indication should be advocated for degenerative mitral regurgitation before the progression of pulmonary hypertension and tricuspid regurgitation. Disclosure Statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. References 1) Montant P, Chenot F, Robert A, et al. Long-term survival in asymptomatic patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation: a propensity score-based comparison between an early surgical strategy and a conservative treatment approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138: 1339-48. 2) Le Tourneau T, Richardson M, Juthier F, et al. Echocardiography predictors and prognostic value of pulmonary artery systolic pressure in chronic organic mitral regurgitation. Heart 2010; 96: 1311-7. 3) Barbieri A, Bursi F, Grigioni F, et al. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of pulmonary hypertension complicating degenerative mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet: a multicenter long-term international study. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 751-9. 4) Kang DH, Kim JH, Rim JH, et al. Comparison of early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 2009; 119: 797-804. 5) Fukumoto Y, Shimokawa H. Recent progress in the management of pulmonary hypertension. Circ J 2011; 75: 1801-10. 6) Tatebe S, Fukumoto Y, Sugimura K, et al. Clinical significance of reactive post-capillary pulmonary hypertension in patients with left heart disease. Circ J 2012; 76: 1235-44. 7) Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008; 118: e523-661. 8) Ghoreishi M, Evans CF, DeFilippi CR, et al. Pulmonary hypertension adversely affects short- and longterm survival after mitral valve operation for mitral regurgitation: implications for timing of surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 1439-52. 9) Goldstone AB, Chikwe J, Pinney SP, et al. Incidence, epidemiology, and prognosis of residual pulmonary hypertension after mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 755-60. 10) Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery the French correction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 86: 323-37. 11) David TE, Bos J, Rakowski H. Mitral valve repair by replacement of chordae tendineae with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101: 495-501. 12) Vincens JJ, Temizer D, Post JR, et al. Long-term outcome of cardiac surgery in patients with mitral stenosis and severe pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 1995; 92: II137-42. 13) Crawford MH, Souchek J, Oprian CA, et al. Determinants of survival and left ventricular performance after mitral valve replacement. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation 1990; 81: 1173-81. 14) Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 816-22. 58 Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 21, No. 1 (2015)