SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Similar documents
ARIC HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM. General Instructions: ID NUMBER: FORM NAME: H F A DATE: 10/13/2017 VERSION: CONTACT YEAR NUMBER:

Supplementary Online Content

EACTS Adult Cardiac Database

This is the author s final accepted version.

ARIC HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM

Disclosure Information : No conflict of interest

DUKECATHR Dataset Dictionary

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

The Author(s) This article is published with open access by ASEAN Federation of Cardiology

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

Supplementary Appendix

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Percutaneous coronary intervention of RIMA. The real challenge!

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Impact of Nicorandil on Renal Function in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Pre-Existing Renal Dysfunction

Performance and Quality Measures 1. NQF Measure Number. Coronary Artery Disease Measure Set

Evidence-Based Management of CAD: Last Decade Trials and Updated Guidelines

Program Metrics. New Unique ID. Old Unique ID. Metric Set Metric Name Description. Old Metric Name

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

The FORMA Early Feasibility Study: 30-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapy in Patients with Severe Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

Supplementary material

IN-HF on line: patient settings (Enrollement period= )

Revascularization for Patients with HFrEF: CABG and PCI and the Concept of Myocardial Viability

CHRONIC HEART FAILURE : WHAT ELSE COULD WE OFFER TO OUR PATIENTS? Cardiac Rehabilitation Society of Thailand

Emergency surgery in acute coronary syndrome

Rhythm Disorders 2017 TazKai LLC and NRSNG.com

Form 136 WHI WOMEN S HEALTH INITIATIVE HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM

Quality Measures MIPS CV Specific

HFpEF. April 26, 2018

Hypothesis: When compared to conventional balloon angioplasty, cryoplasty post-dilation decreases the risk of SFA nses in-stent restenosis

Online Appendix (JACC )

Surgery and device intervention for the elderly with heart failure: assessing the need. Devices and Technology for heart failure in 2011

New PINNACLE Measures The below measures for PINNACLE will be added as new measures to the outcomes reporting starting with Version 2.0.

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

TSDA ACGME Milestones

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

Cardiovascular Health Practice Guideline Outpatient Management of Coronary Artery Disease 2003

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

ARIC. HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM with SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Common Codes for ICD-10

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2018

Medical Management of Acute Heart Failure

Options for my no option Patients Treating Heart Conditions Via a Tiny Catheter

Surgical Consensus Standards Endorsement Maintenance NQF-Endorsed Surgical Maintenance Standards (Phase I) Table of Contents

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT (CABG) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

Title:Relation Between E/e' ratio and NT-proBNP Levels in Elderly Patients with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

Congestive Heart Failure or Heart Failure

Measurement Name Beta-Blocker Therapy Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery. Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington

2016 Internal Medicine Preferred Specialty Measure Set

8/28/2018. Pre-op Evaluation for non cardiac surgery. A quick review from 2007!! Disclosures. John Steuter, MD. None

E/Ea is NOT an essential estimator of LV filling pressures

Toledo Hospital Clinical Quality Indicators. Effective - Heart Attack

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2016

Disclosures The PREVENT IV Trial was supported by Corgentech and Bristol-Myers Squibb

Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors

Practice-Level Executive Summary Report

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Health Status after Transcatheter Mitral- Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Results from the COAPT Trial

Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Frank J. Green, M.D., F.A.C.C. St. Vincent Medical Group

Rationale for Prophylactic Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

STS CABG Composite Quality Rating. Participant STS Period Ending 12/31/2016

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Intraoperative application of Cytosorb in cardiac surgery

1 Week Followup - Intermacs

Heart failure hospitalizations with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK- BENIGN OR A HARBINGER OF HEART FAILURE? PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR?

Supplementary Online Content

Detailed Order Request Checklists for Cardiology

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

Introducing the COAPT Trial

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

HeFSSA Practitioners Program 2017 Theme The Patient Journey: Feel Good and Live Long. Case Study 2

Downloaded from:

Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know

Heart Failure. Cardiac Anatomy. Functions of the Heart. Cardiac Cycle/Hemodynamics. Determinants of Cardiac Output. Cardiac Output

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Relationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Diagnosis, treatment and outcome of acute heart failure in Africa Results of the THESUS-HF study

1 Week Followup 5/27/2014. Nursing Home/Assisted Care Hospice Another hospital Rehabilitation Facility Unknown

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014

J. Schwitter, MD, FESC Section of Cardiology

The Failing Heart in Primary Care

Cardiac Cycle MCQ. Professor of Cardiovascular Physiology. Cairo University 2007

Antonio Colombo. Centro Cuore Columbus and S. Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Miracor Symposium. Speaker: 15. Parigi: May 16-19, 2017

Diastology State of The Art Assessment

Welcome 17 Michigan TAVR Participating Hospitals!

Chapter 4: Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With CKD

EACTS Adult Cardiac Database

Objectives. Systolic Heart Failure: Definitions. Heart Failure: Historical Perspective 2/7/2009

SONOGRAPHER & NURSE LED VALVE CLINICS

Coronary Artery Disease: Revascularization (Teacher s Guide)

Transcription:

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Table S1: Number and percentage of patients by age category Distribution of age Age<=65 820 (68%) 65<Age<=70 191(16%) 70<Age<=75 126 (10%) 75<Age<=80 60 (5%) Age>80 15 (1%)

Table S2 Baseline Characteristics by Age Baseline Age Quartiles Q1 Q2 Q3 (Age 54 (54<Age 60 (60<Age 67 Variable (n=330) (n=295) (n=279) Q4 (Age>67 (n=308) P-value for trend 1 Age (year) 50(47, 53) 57(56, 58) 64(62, 65) 72 (69, 75) Female 35 (11%) 26 (9%) 37 (13%) 50 (16%) 0.011 White race 187 (57%) 189 (64%) 200 (72%) 251 (82%) <0.001 BMI (kg/m 2 ) 27 (24, 31) 27 (24, 30) 27 (24, 30) 26 (24, 29) 0.178 Medical History: Diabetes 103 (31%) 121 (41%) 124 (44%) 130 (42%) 0.003 Hypertension 178 (54%) 177 (60%) 159 (57%) 214 (70%) <0.001 PVD 36 (11%) 40 (14%) 42 (15%) 66 (21%) <0.001 Renal insufficiency 10 (3%) 16 (5%) 25 (9%) 43 (14%) <0.001 Stroke 23 (7%) 14 (5%) 21 (8%) 34 (11%) 0.028 Atrial flutter/ fibrillation 19 (6%) 25 (9%) 42 (15%) 67 (22%) <0.001 Previous MI 250 (76%) 229 (78%) 208 (75%) 247 (80%) 0.320 Hyperlipidemia 190 (58%) 174 (59%) 181 (65%) 185 (60%) 0.286 Depression 24 (7%) 17 (6%) 15 (5%) 20 (7%) 0.646 Current smoker 104 (32%) 64 (22%) 50 (18%) 34 (11%) <0.001 Previous PCI 45 (14%) 38 (13%) 38 (14%) 35 (11%) 0.465 Previous CABG 8 (2%) 10 (3%) 11 (4%) 7 (2%) 0.974 CCS angina class: No angina 106 (32%) 97 (33%) 91 (33%) 148 (48%) <0.001 I 42 (13%) 44 (15%) 52 (19%) 49 (16%) 0.145 II 169 (51%) 141 (48%) 119 (43%) 96 (31%) <0.001 III 10 (3%) 12 (4%) 15 (5%) 11 (4%) 0.551 IV 3 (1%) 1 (<1%) 2 (1%) 4 (1%) 0.583 NYHA class: I 35 (11%) 50 (17%) 22 (8%) 32 (10%) 0.276 II 185 (56%) 134 (45%) 157 (56%) 150 (49%) 0.318 III 100 (30%) 106 (36%) 93 (33%) 113 (37%) 0.152 IV 10 (3%) 5 (2%) 7 (3%) 13 (4%) 0.315 Median systolic BP (mmhg) 120 (110, 130) 120 (110, 130) 120 (110, 130) 122 (110, 136) <0.001 Median heart rate (bpm) 76 (68, 84) 75 (68, 82) 74 (66, 82) 71 (63, 80) <0.001 Median 6 minute walk distance (meter) 352 (259, 434) 360 (273, 415) 340 (270, 400) 321 (250, 385) <0.001 Lab measures: Hemoglobin (g/dl) 14.3 (13.2, 13.9 (12.7, 13.7 (12.6, 13.6 (12.3, 15.4) 14.9) 14.8) 14.6) <0.001 Creatinine (mg/dl) 1.02 (0.90, 1.10 (0.97, 1.10 (0.94, 1.17 (1.00, 1.18) 1.23) 1.30) 1.40) <0.001 Sodium (meq/l) 139 (137, 140 (137, 142) 140 (138, 142) 140 (137, 0.086

142) 142) BUN (mg/dl) 22 (15, 37) 21 (16, 34) 21 (16, 36) 24 (18, 39) 0.016 1. P-values for categorical variables are based on Cochran-Armitage Trend test. Spearman correlation test is performed to get the p-values for continuous variables and the continuous age variable.

Table S3 Baseline Left Ventricular Structure and Function and Coronary Anatomy by Age Variable Q1 (Age 54 (n=330) Baseline Age Quartiles Q2 (54<Age 60 (n=295) Q3 (60<Age 67 (n=279) Q4 (Age>67 (n=308) P-value for Trend 1 Structure and function: LVEF (%) 28 (22, 33) 28 (23, 35) 26 (21, 33) 28 (22, 34) 0.518 ESVI 81 (62, 103) 81 (61, 98) 77 (60, 105) 77 (61, 98) 0.190 EDVI 117 (92, 144) 113 (90, 139) 109 (87, 141) 108 (87, 135) 0.020 E velocity (m/s) 0.70 (0.30, 0.90) 0.70 (0.50, 0.90) 0.70 (0.50, 0.90) 0.60 (0.50, 0.85) <0.001 A velocity (m/s) 0.60 (0.40, 0.80) 0.70 (0.50, 0.80) 0.73 (0.60, 0.90) 0.70 (0.60, 0.90) <0.001 E/A ratio 1.00 (0.75, 2.25) 1.00 (0.71, 1.78) 0.80 (0.63, 1.57) 0.75 (0.57, 1.33) <0.001 E/e ratio (septal) 14 (11, 20) 17 (12, 23) 15 (12, 24) 17 (11, 23) 0.129 E/e ratio (lateral) 11 (8, 15) 12 (9, 16) 13 (9, 17) 12 (8, 17) 0.222 Anterior akinesia or dyskinesia (%) 43 (30, 57) 43 (20, 50) 43 (29, 57) 40 (14, 57) 0.146 MR severity: None or trace 123 (37%) 110 (37%) 106 (38%) 96 (31%) 0.145 Mild 149 (45%) 130 (44%) 128 (46%) 147 (48%) 0.456 Moderate 43 (13%) 47 (16%) 38 (14%) 53 (17%) 0.240 Severe 14 (4%) 8 (3%) 7 (3%) 10 (3%) 0.460 Coronary anatomy: No of vessels with stenosis 50% 1 46 (14%) 24 (8%) 24 (9%) 18 (6%) <0.001 2 101 (31%) 94 (32%) 87 (31%) 84 (27%) 0.362 3 183 (56%) 177 (60%) 168 (60%) 205 (67%) 0.006 Stenosis of proximal LAD 75% 242 (73%) 200 (68%) 185 (66%) 199 (65%) 0.020 Duke CAD severity index 52 (39, 65) 65 (39, 77) 65 (39, 77) 65 (39, 77) 0.039 1. P-values for categorical variables are based on Cochran-Armitage Trend test. Spearman correlation test is performed to get the p-values for continuous variables and the continuous age variable.

LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, ESVI end systolic volume indexed, EDVI - end diastolic volume indexed, E - early diastolic filling velocity, A atrial contraction induced diastolic filling velocity wave, e - early diastolic myocardial velocity, MR mitral regurgitation, LAD left anterior descending, CAD coronary artery disease

Table S4 Procedural Details and Perioperative Complications by Age Variable Q1 (Age 54 (n=149) Baseline Age Quartiles Q2 (54<Age 60 (n=127) Q3 (60<Age 67 (n=131) Q4 (Age>67 (n=148) P-value for Trend 1 Number of conduits: 1 26 (17%) 10 (8%) 15 (12%) 18 (12%) 0.284 2 49 (33%) 37 (29%) 42 (32%) 47 (32%) 0.958 3 60 (40%) 60 (47%) 52 (40%) 64 (43%) 0.894 4 14 (9%) 20 (16%) 22 (17%) 19 (13%) 0.362 Number of arterial conduits: 0 11 (7%) 9 (7%) 12 (9%) 18 (12%) 0.123 1 123 (83%) 104 (82%) 104 (79%) 115 (78%) 0.249 2 15 (10%) 14 (11%) 15 (12%) 15 (10%) 0.957 Number of distal anastomoses: 0 2 (1%) 2 (2%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 0.631 1 23 (15%) 10 (8%) 14 (11%) 16 (11%) 0.319 2 41 (28%) 27 (21%) 30 (23%) 30 (20%) 0.185 3 57 (38%) 55 (43%) 50 (39%) 59 (40%) 0.982 4 22 (15%) 23 (18%) 22 (17%) 31 (21%) 0.211 5 4 (3%) 10 (8%) 12 (9%) 11 (7%) 0.090 Off-pump bypass 40 (27%) 24 (19%) 25 (19%) 27 (18%) 0.083 Total minutes on bypass 83 (63, 110) 92 (72, 125) 93 (66, 110) 89 (70, 126) 0.262 Cross clamp time in minutes 50 (33, 67) 55 (41, 79) 54 (35, 72) 56 (39, 80) 0.097 Intensive Care Unit length of stay in hours 52 (43, 87) 61 (42, 94) 49 (27, 97) 65 (40, 112) 0.124 Perioperative complications Return to operating room 7 (5%) 9 (7%) 7 (5%) 12 (8%) 0.326 Mediastinitis 3 (2%) 4 (3%) 2 (2%) 2 (1%) 0.516 Other infection 9 (6%) 10 (8%) 8 (6%) 19 (13%) 0.061 New onset Atrial Fibrillation 10 (7%) 20 (16%) 22 (17%) 38 (26%) <0.001 Worsening renal impairment 2 (1%) 4 (3%) 12 (9%) 16 (11%) <0.001 Intra-aortic balloon pump 25 (17%) 22 (17%) 24 (18%) 18 (12%) 0.335 Inotropes for low cardiac output 45 (30%) 44 (35%) 56 (43%) 71 (48%) <0.001 Cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation 3 (2%) 3 (2%) 10 (8%) 7 (5%) 0.079 Pulmonary edema requiring intubation 3 (2%) 3 (2%) 4 (3%) 4 (3%) 0.640 Mortality within 30 days after CABG 3 (2%) 5 (4%) 10 (8%) 8 (5%) 0.081 1. P-values for categorical variables are based on Cochran-Armitage Trend test. Spearman correlation test is performed to get the p-values for continuous variables and the continuous age variable.

Table S5: Medical therapy at randomization and at 10 years in each quartile of age by randomized therapy Q1 (Age 54 N(%) Q2 (54<Age 60 N(%) Q3 (60<Age 67 N(%) Q4 (Age>67 N(%) Overall MED CABG P Overall MED CABG P Overall MED CABG P Overall MED CABG P Betablocker Randomization 282 At 10 year 280 follow up 148 143 134 (84) 137 0.39 247 (84) 0.80 246 135 130 (92) 112 (78) 116 0.01 250 0.24 228 124 (92) 117 126 (88) 111 0.23 257 0.94 223 (79) 122 (84) 110 (80) 135 113 (78) 0.76 0.63 ACE inhibitor or ARB Randomization 288 At 10 year 269 follow up 149 (88) 142 139 127 0.83 263 0.17 233 132 119 (84) 131 (92) 114 (86) 0.19 252 0.66 226 121 118 131 108 0.70 282 (92) 0.44 211 (75) 129 104 (76) 153 (94) 107 (74) 0.12 0.68 Statin Randomization 271 (82) At 10 year follow up 264 (86) 147 (86) 135 124 (78) 129 (86) 0.03 242 (82) 0.89 230 (84) 126 118 116 (81) 112 (84) 0.69 230 (82) 0.80 225 118 115 112 (78) 110 0.03 240 (78) 0.79 230 (82) 109 (75) 110 (80) 131 (80) 120 0.27 0.59 Aspirin Randomization 273 At 10 year 272 follow up (88) 145 141 128 (80) 131 0.20 250 0.60 237 (86) 129 118 121 119 0.95 232 0.13 203 (81) 116 (86) 110 116 (81) 93 (76) 0.23 247 (80) 0.07 203 (72) 123 97 (71) 124 (76) 106 (73) 0.05 0.67 Warfarin Randomization 25 (8) At 10 year 39 follow up (13) 17 (10) 18 (11) 8 (5) 21 (14) 0.09 23 (8) 0.49 47 (17) 17 (11) 26 (18) 6 (4) 21 (16) 0.03 35 (13) 0.58 45 (18) 20 (15) 24 (19) 15 (10) 21 (17) 0.27 44 (14) 0.77 74 (26) 22 (15) 36 (26) 22 (13) 38 (26) 0.67 0.99 Potassium sparing diuretic Randomization 161 (49) At 10 year follow up 173 (56) 84 (49) 86 (54) 77 (48) 87 (58) 0.82 137 (46) 0.53 147 (53) 70 (46) 75 (53) 67 (47) 72 (54) 0.89 136 (49) 0.83 150 (60) 67 (50) 80 (62) 69 (48) 70 (57) 0.77 122 (40) 0.45 127 (45) 55 (38) 59 (43) 67 (41) 68 (47) 0.57 0.52

Table S6: Cross overs from each treatment arm by quartile of age Randomized Treatment MED patients who crossed over to CABG CABG patients who crossed over to MED Q1 (Age 54 (n=330) 24/170 (14.1) 11/160 (6.9) Baseline Age Quartiles Q2 Q3 (54<Age 60 (60<Age 67 (n=295) (n=279) 13/152 (8.6) 16/135 (11.9) 16/143 (11.2) 13/144 (9.0) Q4 (Age>67 (n=308) 13/145 (9.0) 15/163 (9.2) Total (n=1212) 66/602 (11.0) P Value 0.25 55/610 (9.0) 0.62

Table S7: Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for CABG plus optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone by quartile of age Q2 Q1 (Age 54 (n=330) (54<Age 60 (n=295) Q3 (60<Age 67 (n=279) Q4 (Age>67 (n=308) All-cause death 0.66 (0.49, 0.89) 0.87 (0.64, 1.18) 1.00 (0.75, 1.33) 0.82 (0.63, 1.06) Cardiovascular death 0.61 (0.43, 0.85) 0.88 (0.63, 1.24) 1.02 (0.73, 1.44) 0.70 (0.50, 0.97) Death or cardiovascular hospitalization 0.55 (0.43, 0.71) 0.81 (0.62, 1.05) 0.85 (0.66, 1.09) 0.73 (0.57, 0.92)

Figure S1 Hazard ratio (solid line) and 95% confidence interval (grey area) for the effect of CABG vs medical therapy across the range of age- as treated analysis accounting for cross overs