INJECTABLE MICRO-MINERALS (MULTIMIN ) PROVE TO BE AN EFFECTIVE AND ESSENTIAL ROUTE OF MICRO-MINERAL SUPPLEMENTATION FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS.

Similar documents
Free access minerals

Comparison of Trace Mineral Source on Cow Trace Mineral Status, Reproduction, and Calf Weaning Weight on Two Commercial Ranches

Ruminant Health, Vitamin, Minerals & Nutrition. Presented by Marty Ulrich

Developing a mineral program: combining the art and the science. Mary Drewnoski, Beef Systems Specialist, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

MANATEE LIVESTOCKER. Calendar Of Events

Providing a Legacy of Herd Profitability

Mineral Supplementation of Grazing Beef Cows in Florida

The Diploma in Ruminant Nutrition

Maintaining proper nutrition is one of the best preventative measures a producer can take to maintain a healthy, efficient herd. Extensive research

MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS AND FEED ADDITIVES CAN THEY ELIMINATE FESCUE TOXICITY?

The Mineral Specialists

MANAGING THE DAIRY COW DURING THE DRY PERIOD

Balanced nutritional solutions for optimal animal performance

Selenium Nutrition of Grazing Beef Cattle in Florida. Overview 1/22/2018. Introduction Selenium functions Requirements & Toxicity Deficiency

Beef Cattle Handbook

Forage Quality and Livestock Nutrition on Pasture. Patrick Davis, Ph. D. Johnson County MU Extension Livestock Specialist

Understanding and Utilizing Feed Tags for Effective. Mineral Supplementation

Formulating Mineral Supplements for Beef Cows

KNZ. FREE CHOICE SALT & MINERAL LICKS GROW YOUR BUSINESS HIGH QUALITY LICKS, HIGH ADDED VALUE

PIONEER FEEDS DAIRY CATTLE AND CALF FEEDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION.

Mega Min. Maximise the potential of your livestock. Solutions. AUSTRALIA

THOMSON & JOSEPH LTD. The Mineral Specialists GRASS SILAGE EARLY SEASON MINERAL PROFILE

Yak Exhibition Nutrition. Good Nutrition in the Pregnant/ Lactating Cow is Essential for a Healthy Calf

Update on Mineral Nutrition of Dairy Cows. Bill Weiss Dept of Animal Sciences

22 June Summer Feeding Update July 2011 Bulletin Richard Keel

TRACE MINERAL STATUS IN DAIRY COWS: EFFECTS ON HEALTH AND PERFORMANCE. S. B. Blezinger Technical Services Nutritionist MultiMin, USA, Inc.

Free Choice Sheep Mineral

Beef Strategies for the Ozarks

Trace Element Deficiencies in Heifers

How To Interpret A Forage Mineral Profile Correctly August 2012 Bulletin Richard Keel

Nutritional Management of Dairy Cows During the Transition Period

Chapter-6 Feed formulation - nutrients requirement for different category of dairy animals, balanced/complete ration, methods of feed formulation

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle E-974

Digging into copper & trace minerals M. Faulkner, PhD

The effect of injectable trace mineral (selenium, copper, zinc, and manganese) on health and production of lactating Holstein cows

Timing. Stages of lactation. Needs. Key. Feed. May. Mid June Mid June. Mid July (3 weeks before calving date) Dry period. period.

Proposed New Code of Practice for Copper Supplementation of Ruminant Livestock April 2011 Bulletin Richard Keel

How Do I Supplement My Livestock With Minerals? Part IV

Animal Science: Isotopes and Nuclear Techniques

Methods Tennessee Livestock Producers, Inc. (Tennessee Farm Bureau Federation, Columbia,

MINERAL IMBALANCES AND SUPPLEMENTATION STUDIES A TOOL TO AUGMENT PRODUCTION AND REPRODUCTION IN FARM ANIMALS

GrainCorp Feeds. Delivering you choice and flexibility

Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences e-issn Bhanderi BM et al.; Sch J Agric Vet Sci 2014; 1(4A):

Making Sense of Mineral Supplementation

Sulphate or Organic. or Combination? The choice is yours. P(Phosphorus) Se(Selenium) K(Potassiu. Co(Cobalt) Zn(Zinc) Mo(Molybdenum) Na(Sodium)

Supplementation for the Cow-Calf Calf Producer

Optimum production or income over feed cost during the subsequent lactation occurs with 50- to 70-day dry periods.

{A number of conditions

Feeding the Suckler Cow by Siobhan Kavanagh, Mark McGee, Liam Fitzgerald

CPT David J. Licciardello, DVM Veterinary Advisor

Feeding the Doe Herd. Lyle W. McNichol PAg. Lyle McNichol Livestock Consulting Services

McFleeg Feeds. McFleeg Feeds. The Brand Behind the Beef. The Brand Behind the Beef.

Dry Period. Medications: Additives: Pre-Fresh Period

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

Effect of Prenatal Trace Mineral Source on Neonatal and Growing Calf Liver and Serum Mineral Status

Refining our Mineral Nutrition Program. Objective of Supplementation. Do I have a problem? Types of Minerals. Mineral Interactions 1/19/2017

Dry Period. Medications: Additives: Pre-Fresh Period

Optimize Cow-Calf Profits with Better Trace Mineral Management

Tom s 20 Questions to Determine Where Your Herd is T.P. Tylutki PhD Dpl ACAN AMTS LLC

Research Review MINERAL SUPPLEMENTATION OF FEEDLOT CATTLE

Cows Fed Availa 4 Produce More Milk, Show Better Reproductive Performance

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Trace Minerals for Backgrounding and Finishing Beef Cattle. Rick Corbett. Take Home Message

Mineral Supplements for Beef Cattle

The Effect of MIN-AD on Performance and Health in Early Lactation Dairy Cows

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Mineral Nutri,on and Its Impact on Reproduc,on

Fact Sheet. Feed Testing & Analysis for Beef Cattle

The Effects of Feeding MIN-AD and Sodium Bicarbonate on Early Lactation Performance of Dairy Cattle

Feedtech for calves and transition cows support when it s most needed

High Rates of Selenium Supplementation for Sheep to Determine Selenium Retention via Forage Fertilization

Diagnosing Common Vitamin and Mineral Abnormalities in Dairy Cattle

Product Guide. Nutritional supplements for all your livestock needs

Dalesman Buckets & blocks

FEED ADDITIVES: MODES OF ACTION AND ASSESSING THEIR EFFICACY

Study on Availability of Various Macro and Micro-Minerals in Lactating Buffaloes under Field Conditions of Sabarkantha District of Gujarat

Transition Problems and How to Prevent Them. Bill Weiss Dept of Animal Sciences OARDC/The Ohio State Univ.

INCLUSION OF FAT IN DIETS FOR EARLY LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS. J. E. Shirley and M. E. Scheffel

VitaFerm + Creep Feed = Easy Transition and Efficient Gain

Lesson 3 Understanding Nutrients and Their Importance

PREGNANT & LACTATING EWES NSE157: EWE WITH LAMB 18

Milk Urea Nitrogen Evaluation in Louisiana Dairy Herds

Interaction of Nutrition and Health in Cows. Dr. Matt Hersom Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Dept. of Animal Sciences

Effects of Harvest Date and Late-Summer Fertilization Rate on Stockpiled Bermudagrass Forage Mineral Concentrations

Hoof Health: Foundation Formula

How to Reduce Costly Calf Hood Disease Through Immune Support

A Very Specific System

Vitamin Needs of Dairy Cattle 1

Phase B 5 Questions Correct answers are worth 10 points each.

PB1749-Mineral Nutrition of Beef Cattle

Pure rumen conditioning with bio-available minerals

Causes and prevention of displaced abomasum (DA) in dairy cows

Dairy Range FEEDING FOR EFFICIENT PRODUCTION

Basic Cow Nutrition. Dr. Matt Hersom 1

9 Managing blockcalving

Dairy Feed 14% - Textured

NPN - Warning INDEX. NPB - Warning Company profile

Mineral-Vitamin Requirements of Beef Cattle

Evaluating Feed Purchasing Options: Energy, Protein, and Mineral Supplements

Advanced Mineral Performance Technology

Transcription:

INJECTABLE MICRO-MINERALS (MULTIMIN ) PROVE TO BE AN EFFECTIVE AND ESSENTIAL ROUTE OF MICRO-MINERAL SUPPLEMENTATION FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS. Dr Neil Michael, DVM, Angela Storch, MS, Willie Smith, PhD INTRODUCTION: Optimizing micro-mineral functions in high producing dairy cows is essential, especially at the three critical events in the annual production/reproduction cycle, namely dry off, calving and breeding. However, recent micro-mineral (TM) research and scientific reviews indicate the micro-mineral status of dairy cows and consequently the efficiency of micro-mineral dependent functions are sub-optimal at these critical stages. Several factors decrease the efficiency of micro-mineral supplementation through TMR's, grain mixes and free choice mineral supplements. Hutjens & Tomlinson, (2001) suggest, at the producer level, practical supplementation of dairy cows during the early dry period and three weeks before calving and heifers from pregnancy diagnosis until moving in the close-up group, is often poor. The total, actual days in the close-up group by many animals is too short to correct for poor trace mineral intakes during the early dry period as dry matter intake is significantly decreased during the transition period. Free-choice mineral supplements have limitations as a route to supply essential micro-minerals to dairy cows during the early dry period due to intake variation and antagonisms between minerals. McDowell (2003) attributes the large variation in intake of free choice supplements between animals to, among others, the following factors; producer management level, soil fertility, forage type, season of year, availability of other supplements and grains or feeds, salt content of drinking water, antagonist content in mineral supplement, palatability of mineral supplement etc. The negative effects micro-mineral antagonists, located in drinking water, pasture, feeds and free-choice supplements, have on the efficiency of micro-mineral absorption from the digestive tract of ruminants is commonly underestimated. High levels of calcium, phosphorous, iron, sulphur, and molybdenum are known to decrease the efficiency of absorption of the essential micro-minerals, zinc, manganese, selenium and copper from the gut. The degree of absorption suppression depends on the type and amount of antagonists. Arthington (2003) considers the excess antagonists effects, on the absorption of essential micro-minerals from the gut, as the most important factor resulting in ruminants sub-optimal micro-mineral status. The above factors suggest an alternative route of essential micro-mineral supplementation in dairy cattle should be implemented in micro-mineral supplementation programs on commercial dairy operations. Tissue-friendly injectable supplements, containing key micro-mineral levels in a scientifically correct ratio, have been shown to significantly increase micro-mineral status. Results have demonstrated increased immunocompetence at calving and enhanced reproductive efficiency in dairy cows, especially during the first 100 days in milk (DIM). Mitchell (2003) showed cows receiving two injections (one 4 weeks before calving and one 4 weeks before breeding) had a 22% reduction in mastitis during the first 30 DIM and conception increased significantly resulting in an improved pregnancy rate from18 to 20%, with a return on investment (ROI) of 19:1.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of two micro-mineral injections (each supplying 200 mg zinc, 50 mg manganese, 25 mg selenium and 75 mg copper) one 4 weeks before calving and one 4 weeks before breeding on micro-mineral dependent functions in addition to feed micro-mineral supplementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A well managed dairy herd in Waunakee, Wisconsin (750 cows; 27800lbs RHA; 3X milking), with less than average mastitis and other immune responsive disorders and better than average reproduction efficiency, was selected for this study. At the start of the trial the herd averaged a heat detection rate of 65% and an annualized pregnancy rate (PR) of 16%. The feeding regime and supplementary micro-mineral/vitamin program was regarded as adequate. The ration was formulated to contain the following micro-mineral levels (ppm): cobalt-1.21, copper-27, iodine-3.4, manganese-89, zinc-95 and selenium-0.5. Micro-minerals were supplemented utilizing an inorganic trace mineral package combined with Zinpro' s 4- Plex'P'. Iron was not supplemented, but it was estimated the feedstuffs in the total diet contributed 183ppm. Dairy Comp 305 software was used to track injections, monitor trial progress and collect data. The trial took place from January 2003 to December 2003 with January 2003 to January 2004 data analyzed. Cows with odd ID's (n=278) were injected with 5mL Multimin (MM- treatment group) 3 to 4 weeks prior to expected calving date and 3 to 4 before the end of the voluntary waiting period (VWP = 45DIM). Cows with even ID's (n=311) were injected with 8mL of MuSe (MScontrol group) at 3 to 4 weeks before expected calving date. Control cows received MS as part of the dairy's standard management procedures Statistical methods and Data analysis Cow events occurring up to 150-200 DIM were used in the analysis to focus on the critical period for treatment efficacy. Pregnancy data were classified in a contingency table according to binomial outcome (pregnant or open by DIM cohorts) for each of the two treatments (MM and MS). Chi-squared tests were performed to test the null-hypotheses of independence between the two factors (x - treatment and y - pregnancy result) as follows: Ho: Whether a cow becomes pregnant or not within a given time is independent of the treatment she received. When the Chi-squared value is significant (P<0.05) the null-hypotheses of independence is rejected. Health (lameness and retained placentas) and milk quality (mastitis) related incidences were summarized as total number of events by treatment and statistically tested using Chi-Square as mentioned above. Regression Analysis was used to determine the median days open (MDOPN- DIM when 50% of the herd is open) for each treatment and calculate the respective 95% confidence limits, The regression of percent open on DIM is nonlinear. When percent open is subjected to inverse of Ln transformation the nonlinear relation becomes a straight line. Linear regression analysis was performed for each treatment with DIM as independent variable and l/(percent Open) or Ln (Open) as dependant variable. 2

Costs of two injections ofmm and economic value of improved reproductive efficiency were used to calculate a return on investment and impact on dairy profitability. 3 RESUL TS AND DISCUSSION: No difference was seen in mastitis incidences between the cows receiving MM and those receiving MS. As referenced in Mitchell (2003), research has shown a correlation between increased selenium content in blood and reduced cases of mastitis. Additional research showed increased keratin production in the teat with organic zinc supplementation. The current dairy provided all cows with organic zinc ration supplementation and control cows received MS, an additional source of selenium, which may have affected the overall results. Cows receiving MM tended to have lower incidences of retained placentas (RP) n=28 versus control cows n=38 (P=0.29). Although not statistical, decreased RP events may indicate not only selenium, but also zinc, copper and/or manganese are involved in the prevention of retained placentas. Alternatively, selenium in MM was utilized more efficiently within the balanced multi-mineral formulation compared to only selenium in MS. Cows receiving MM tended to have lower incidences of lameness reported n=8 versus control cows n=16 (P=O.13). Although it was not significant, it represents the potential ofmm to improve nutritional balance or micro-mineral status and therefore hoof health. Percent Cows Pregnant (within a specific time frame) of all MM treated cows trended higher than the percent cows pregnant of control cows at days 80, 90, 100,110,120,130,140 and 150 in milk (Fig. 1). Values approached significance (P<.05) at 80, 140 and 150 DIM. Figure1 : The Effect of MULTIMIN vs MuSe on Percent Cows Pregnant (all cows) at Days 80,90,100,110,120,130,140 & 150 in Milk L_ 65 l - 60 -- f-- c: III c: 55./ - - C) CII.. 1- - 0.. 50 III f-- - f-- - ;: 45 0 0 40-1- - f------ -.. -c:..., CII CII 0.. 35 30 25 T,- - - - 1- - 1- - f-- - f-- 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 DMuSe 30.4 35.2 41.7 44.8 49.1 51.3 53 55.2 a MULTIMIN 39.1 42.3 47.9 53 55.8 59.5 61.9 64.2 Dp= 0.0560.1230.1 91 0.0820.1 580.081 O.06 0.054 Days In Milk The percentage increase in pregnancy production resulting from the two MM injections was very similar to that found by Mitchell (2003) indicating injectable micro-mineral supplementation helps increase optimal micro-mineral status and therefore improved reproductive performance.

The effect ofmm on percent pregnant (within a specific time frame) was enhanced in second lactation cows, also seen by Mitchell (2003) (Figure 2). This difference was highly significant (P<O.Ol) early in lactation. 4 Figure 2 : The Effect of MULTIMIN vs MuSe on percent=owsj Pregnant in Second Lactation Cows on Days 80,90,100,110,120,130,140 & 150 in Milk ~ I 'E 55 / -- ~ cti c: f- Cl 50 I!! ~ Il. 45 ~ 40 0 - f----- l- I- I- o /- 1-35 -c: - - ~ I-- 1- - Ql 30 / ~ eql ~ - ~ I- ~ ~ J - I-- I-- I-- Il. 25 (" 20 80 90 100 110 1120 130 140 150 o MuSe 21.7 25 29.4 35.9 40.2 43.5 44.6 48.9 omultimin 40.8! 44.8 47.4 48.47 50 54 56.6 59.2 Dp= 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.2 0.18 0.12 0.18 Days In Milk Increased conception and pregnancy production resulted in a decrease in MDOPN from 119 days in the MS group to 99 days in the MM group (P<O.05) (Figure 3). Figure 3. The effect of MULTlMIN on days open in All Cows between 80 and 200 days in milk of which the regression analysis were used to calculate the 95% confidence limits in decreased Median days Open. 70~--- 60~~ ~------------------------------------------~ e 50 Ql C- O '$. 40 30 20 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 DIM Controlc::::::r MM-Log. (Control)-Log. (M'MfJ

Second lactation cows receiving MM experienced_similar improved reproductive efficiency with MDOPN decreased to 100 DIM from 147 DIM for MS treated cows (P<0.05) (Figure 4). 5 Figure 4. The effect of Multimin on days open in Second Lactation Cows between 80 and 200 days in milk of which the regression analysis were used to calculate the 95% confidence limits in decreased Median Days Open BO~~---------------------------------------------, 70 +---IIm1-- '~E.:------ 60~.~~~4m~~~--------------------------------~ 30 20 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 DIM Control c::3j MM -Log. (Control) -Log. (MM) Improved reproduction efficiency by decreasing MDOPN and increasing percent pregnant (within a specific time frame) can be of economic value for producers. The value of reduced MDOPN is worth approximately $2.50 per cow per day. The reduction in MDOPN (all cows) of 20 days found in this study is estimated to be worth approximately $50 per animal per year. With the cost oftwo MM injections at $4 ($2 per injection), the approximate return on investment is 12.5: 1. CONCLUSION: Trial results indicate the efficiency of micro-mineral functions in dairy cows on an "adequate" feed micro-mineral program can be enhanced significantly by the addition of two Multimin'" injections to the management program given at critical stress periods, 4 weeks before expected calving date and 4 weeks before breeding. Reductions in retained placentas and lameness events indicate a possible improvement in regulation of immune competence in Multimin supplemented animals during the transition and early breeding period. Percent cows pregnant in the Multimin supplemented group trended higher than their peers receiving MuSe, especially during early lactation where there was a significant reduction in Median Days Open. Improved reproductive efficiency is a financial benefit to producers, returning cows to the decreasing the calving interval, providing additional replacements, returning animals to the next lactation sooner, ultimately more peak milk production.

REFERENCES: ABS Global Technical Services Team, 2002. Pregnancies: A Profitability Driver on a Dairy. ABS Breeders Journal, June 2002, p2. Arthington, J., 2003. Mineral antagonism may influence copper deficiencies. Feedstuffs, June 16, 2003, pi1. Hutjens, M.F. & Tomlinson, D.J., 2001. Nutrition important in transition feeding programs. Feedstuffs, December 31,2001, p9. Me Dowell, L.R., 2003. Grazing ruminants require free-choice minerals. Feedstuffs, November 17,2003, p12. Mitchell, K., 2003. Case Study (Case 1). Trace Minerals and Dairy Cattle. Bovine Veterinarian, September 2003, p32 and 34. Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G., 1980. Statistical Methods, 7th Edition, The Iowa State University Press, Ames. 6