Effects of Antiproliferative Protein (APP) on Modulation of Cytosolic Protein Phosphorylation of Prostatic Carcinoma Cell Line LNCaP

Similar documents
Cell Signaling part 2

Molecular Cell Biology - Problem Drill 19: Cell Signaling Pathways and Gene Expression

G-Protein Signaling. Introduction to intracellular signaling. Dr. SARRAY Sameh, Ph.D

Principles of Genetics and Molecular Biology

Chapter 15: Signal transduction

Plasma membranes. Plasmodesmata between plant cells. Gap junctions between animal cells Cell junctions. Cell-cell recognition

Chapter 9. Cellular Signaling

Lipids and Membranes

Chapter 11. Cell Communication

Revision. camp pathway

Signal Transduction: G-Protein Coupled Receptors

Lecture 15. Signal Transduction Pathways - Introduction

Phospho-AKT Sampler Kit

Cell Communication. Local and Long Distance Signaling

Propagation of the Signal

CYTOKINE RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

Signal Transduction Pathways. Part 2

Previous Class. Today. Detection of enzymatic intermediates: Protein tyrosine phosphatase mechanism. Protein Kinase Catalytic Properties

Growth and Differentiation Phosphorylation Sampler Kit

Protein kinases are enzymes that add a phosphate group to proteins according to the. ATP + protein OH > Protein OPO 3 + ADP

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. PowerPoint Lectures for Biology, Seventh Edition. Lectures by Chris Romero. Neil Campbell and Jane Reece

Regulation of cell function by intracellular signaling

The Tissue Engineer s Toolkit

MEK1 Assay Kit 1 Catalog # Lot # 16875

Cellular Signaling Pathways. Signaling Overview

Cell Communication. Cell Communication. Communication between cells requires: ligand: the signaling molecule

HORMONES (Biomedical Importance)

Chapter 11. Cell Communication. Signal Transduction Pathways

Signal-Transduction Cascades - 2. The Phosphoinositide Cascade

Mechanisms of Hormone Action

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Discovery and Optimization of Inhibitors of STAT3 Activation for the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

2013 W. H. Freeman and Company. 12 Signal Transduction

The elements of G protein-coupled receptor systems

T cell maturation. T-cell Maturation. What allows T cell maturation?

Cell Communication. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Sarah Jaar Marah Al-Darawsheh

Case 19 Purification of Rat Kidney Sphingosine Kinase

Mouse Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Fluorescent Detection Kit

Enzyme-coupled Receptors. Cell-surface receptors 1. Ion-channel-coupled receptors 2. G-protein-coupled receptors 3. Enzyme-coupled receptors

Computational Biology I LSM5191

Bio 111 Study Guide Chapter 11 Cell Communication

Figure S1 Time-dependent down-modulation of HER3 by EZN No Treatment. EZN-3920, 2 μm. Time, h

Receptors Functions and Signal Transduction- L4- L5

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Receptor mediated Signal Transduction

Cytokines and Growth Factors

KEY CONCEPT QUESTIONS IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

Introduction! Introduction! Introduction! Chem Lecture 10 Signal Transduction & Sensory Systems Part 2

Physiology Unit 1 CELL SIGNALING: CHEMICAL MESSENGERS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS

Cell Communication. Cell Communication. Cell Communication. Cell Communication. Cell Communication. Chapter 9. Communication between cells requires:

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for


3.D- Cell Communication

In Vitro Studies of the Aurora-Kinase Inhibitor MLN8237 in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines

Tumor Immunology. Wirsma Arif Harahap Surgical Oncology Consultant

Human Hydrogen Peroxide Fluorescent Detection Kit

Cell Communication and Cell Signaling

Effects of Second Messengers

BL 424 Chapter 15: Cell Signaling; Signal Transduction

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Key Concepts in Chapter 11. Cellular Messaging. Cell-to-cell communication is essential for multicellular organisms

Phospholipase C γ Prof. Graham Carpenter

Supplementary Figure 1. Normal T lymphocyte populations in Dapk -/- mice. (a) Normal thymic development in Dapk -/- mice. Thymocytes from WT and Dapk

Mammalian Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology. Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

MCB*4010 Midterm Exam / Winter 2008

Data Sheet TIGIT / NFAT Reporter - Jurkat Cell Line Catalog #60538

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Overview: The Cellular Internet

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology. Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Chapter 11: Enzyme Catalysis

MCB 4211 Basic Immunology 2nd Exam; 10/26/17 Peoplesoft #:

Chapter 11: Cell Communication

BIOLOGY. Cell Communication CAMPBELL. Reece Urry Cain Wasserman Minorsky Jackson. Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick

Vets 111/Biov 111 Cell Signalling-2. Secondary messengers the cyclic AMP intracellular signalling system

Bihong Zhao, M.D, Ph.D Department of Pathology

Regulation of Enzymatic Activity. Lesson 4

Chapter 20. Cell - Cell Signaling: Hormones and Receptors. Three general types of extracellular signaling. endocrine signaling. paracrine signaling

Cell Communication CHAPTER 11

2402 : Anatomy/Physiology

PTM Discovery Method for Automated Identification and Sequencing of Phosphopeptides Using the Q TRAP LC/MS/MS System

Chem Lecture 10 Signal Transduction

(PDGF), 9 ( -2 (FGF-2), SMO

Intrinsic cellular defenses against virus infection

BIOLOGY. Cell Communication CAMPBELL. Reece Urry Cain Wasserman Minorsky Jackson. Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick

Page 32 AP Biology: 2013 Exam Review CONCEPT 6 REGULATION

COURSE: Medical Microbiology, PAMB 650/720 - Fall 2008 Lecture 16

Introduction: 年 Fas signal-mediated apoptosis. PI3K/Akt

TUMOR M ARKERS MARKERS

Oncolytic virus strategy

Midi Plant Genomic DNA Purification Kit

Basis and Clinical Applications of Interferon

Disorders of Cell Growth & Neoplasia

Enzymes Part III: regulation II. Dr. Mamoun Ahram Summer, 2017

Cells communicate with each other via signaling ligands which interact with receptors located on the surface or inside the target cell.

Cytokine Arrays Reveal Black Ops Tactics of Tumor-induced Immunosuppression

BIOLOGY. Cell Communication. Outline. Evolution of Signaling. Overview: Cellular Messaging. Local and Long-Distance Signaling

Cell Lysis Buffer. Catalog number: AR0103

AMPK Phosphorylation Assay Kit

Signaling Through Immune System Receptors (Ch. 7)

By the name of Allah

Transcription:

Effects of Antiproliferative Protein (APP) on Modulation of Cytosolic Protein Phosphorylation of Prostatic Carcinoma Cell Line LNCaP Mohsen Abolhassani Dept. of Immunology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran 13164, I.R. Iran; Dept. of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595. ABSTRACT Antiproliferative protein (APP) isolated from conditioned media of two androgen -independent prostatic carcinoma cell lines, PC3 and Du-145 was shown to inhibit selectively cell proliferation of androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line LNCaP in a dose dependent manner. This protein was further purified with HPLC using hydrophobic interaction column (pheny l 5PW) and was used to study the modulation of protein phosphorylation of LNCaP cells. The data indicated that antiproliferative protein could partially change the cytosolic protein phosphorylation. When compared with control LNCaP cells, in APP-treated cells 4 new proteins (88, 46, 30 and 18 kda) were phosphorylated, while a 72 kda phosphoprotein was de-phosphorylated. The same results were obtained when two types of protein kinase activators were used. Protein kinase activators showed that the above changes of protein phosphorylation are not due to the protein kinase C or DNA protein kinase activity. These data may indicate the inhibition of LNCaP cell's proliferation by APP may be is due to the modulation of protein kinases and as a result due to interference on second messenger pathway. Iran. Biomed. J 2: 9-13, 1998. Keywords: Antiproliferative protein, protein phosphorylation, LNCaP cells, Prostatic carcinoma INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is currently the most common malignancy and is the second leading cause of cancer death among males in the United States. For more than 50 years, hormonal therapy has been the major therapeutic procedure for metastatic prostate cancer [1]. After initial response, patients inevitably develop a tumor that is hormonally unresponsive and resistant to the current therapeutic procedures. Other available treatments such as radiation, surgery and chemotherapy have not prolonged survival of patients with metastatic carcinoma. Recently, promising results were obtained in cancer treatment by immunotherapy using cytokines in experimental animal models [2-4]. Previous studies indicated that tumor cell lines produce and release into their condition media (CM) several growth regulatory factors [5-8]. Some of these factors have been purified and some remained to be characterized. Recently, we have identified a new antiproliferative protein (APP) from serum -free conditioned medium of two androgen-independent prostatic carcinoma cell lines (PC3 and DU-145)[9]. This protein selectively inhibits cell proliferation of an androgen-dependent prostatic carcinoma cell line (LNCaP). No antiproliferative activity was observed against mouse fibroblast 3T3, normal human lymphocytes, human leukemic cells including promyelocyte HL-60 or T cell HUT-78, or human adenocarcinoma cell lines including prostatic cells JCA-1, ovary NIH:OVCAR-3, cervix C-33A or breast MDA-MB-231. APP did not induce apoptosis, but it prevented the LNCaP cells from entering into the S phase of the cell cycle. The antiproliferative activity was reversible and was not affected by neutralizing antibodies against the well known cytokines such as TGF 1,2,3, TNF-α, PDGF, EGF, IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, and IL-6. APP was partially purified by gel filtration, ion-exchange chromatography and SDS-PAGE with an apparent molecular weight of 50 kda. Biochemical studies revealed that APP is sensitive to high temperature and protease digestion but not to reducing agent, ph 2.0, DNase or RNase digestion. Tel. & Fax: (98-21) 649-2596; E. Mail: abolhasa@nrcgeb.ac.ir

Abolhassani In this report, attempts were made to determine the mechanism of action of APP at the cellular lever. This protein was purified by HPLC and could modulate cytosolic protein phosphorylation of the APP-treated LNCaP cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell lines and conditioned media. All cell lines were maintained in complete medium (RPMI -1640 containing 10% FBS). PC3 and DU-145 cell lines were also grown in serum-free medium (ITS +, Collaborative Research, Inc.). Mycoplasma-free cells were cultured for 72 h at 37 C and the culture supernatants were collected, centrifuged and filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane and kept frozen until use. Cell proliferation assay. Cell proliferation was performed as described previously [9]. LNCaP cells were plated in 96-well plates at 4.5 10 4 cells per ml and APP preparations were added to a final volume of 200 µl. Cells were incubated at 37 C for 48 h and during the last 4 h they were pulse labeled with 2.0 µci/m1 [ 3 H]-thymidine. LNCaP cells were detached with trypsin, harvested on glass filters, and the incorporated 3 H-thymidine was measured. Protein purification by HPLC. APP was further purified by HPLC using hydrophobic interaction column, Phenyl-5PW (8 75 mm), (Waters). PC3 positive fractions from S-200 column (120 µg/100 µl) was injected into the HPLC column. A linear gradient from 100% A [1.5 M (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (Na 2 HPO 4 ), ph 7] to 100% B (0.1 M phosphate buffer, ph 7) was used during 60 min at flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Fractions were concentrated, dialyzed against RPMI-1640 and after filtering through a 0.22 µm membrane were used for cell proliferation assay. Cytosolic protein phosphorylation. LNCaP cells were treated with HPLC-purified APP and cultured for 2 days. Cells were subjected to in vitro phosphorylation assay using [γ 32 P] ATP. Cells were lysed and after centrifugation, cytosolic proteins were separated with 10% SDS-PAGE and phosphoproteins were analyzed by autoradiography. Also, two types of protein kinase activators were used: poly(da)-poly(dt) for DNA-PK (double - stranded DNA-dependent protein kinase) and Ca +2 phosphatidyl serine for PKC (Ca +2 /phospholipiddependent protein kinase). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The phosphorylation of proteins by protein kinases is an important mediator of cell metabolism. Protein kinase activity has been shown to be involved in regulation of intercellular communication, intracellular signal transduction, cell division, protein activity and several other cellular systems [10]. Most of the serine/threonine kinases studied to date are soluble, cytosolic proteins. This group includes protein kinases C (PKC), camp - dependent protein kinase (PKA), and cgmp - dependent protein kinase (PKG). In contrast, tyro - sine kinase activities are often found in the cytosolic regions of membrane-associated receptors. In many cases, such as the EGF receptor and the insulin receptor, ligand binding to the receptor's extracellular domain leads to activation of the tyrosine kinase activity [11]. This results in phosphorylation of the receptor as well as other intracellular targets, initiating a cascade of signal transduction. In this report, attempts were made to determine whether APP plays a regulatory role in protein phosphorylation of treated LNCaP cells. This question may be addressed using protein kinase activators, inhibitors or, alternatively by using purified kinases. For this reason, APP that was previously semi-purified by column chromotography [9], was further purified by HPLC using hydrophobic interaction column (Phenyl -5PW). This column separates macromolecules based on their hydrophobicity in the presence of high salt condition. Fourteen fractions were eluted from the column. Cell proliferation assay showed that only the last fraction out of the column had antiproliferative activity on LNCaP cells. This result indicates that APP is very hydrophobic and could be purified in an active form by HPLC. About 0.3 µg of purified protein was used for assay and 56.8% suppression of proliferation was obtained. This indicates purification factor of about 600 by comparing to the original CM. To study cytosolic protein phosphorylation, LNCaP cells were treated with purified APP for 2 days and then the cells were subjected to in vitro phosphorylation assay. Fig. 1 shows autoradiography data of LNCaP cell cytosolic protein phosphorylation and de-phosphorylation in the presence or absence of APP. When control cells 10

Fig. l. Autoradiogram of LNCaP cells cytosolic phosphorylated proteins separated by SDS-PAGE. Lanes A, B and C are untreated LNCaP cells as controls and Lanes D, E, and F are APP-treated cells. DNA-PK activator was added to lanes B and E and PKC activator to lanes C and F. 11

Abolhassani were compared with APP-treated cells, several changes in protein phosphorylation were observed. Four new proteins (88, 46, 30 and 18 kda) were phosphorylated, while a 72 kda phosphoprotein was dephosphorylated. The same results were obtained when two types of protein kinase activators were used: DNA-PK activator [poly(da)-poly(dt)] for DNAPK (double - stranded DNA-dependent protein kinase) and PKC activator (Ca +2 phosphatidyl serine) for PKC (Ca +2 /phospholipid-dependent protein kinase). It seems that the above changes in protein phosphorylation of five proteins are not due to the PKC or DNA-PK activity, since their activators failed to induce any changes in these phosphoprotein. In contrast, enhancement of phosphorylation of 54 kda protein seems to be due to the DNA- PK activity, since it was seen only in the presence of its activator. These results may suggest that APP can activate some kinases and inhibits others. Inhibitors of Ser/Thr-kinases and phosphatases such as calphostin C and okadaic acid were shown to inhibit effectively the LNCaP cell growth [12]. Therefore, these enzymes may involve in regulation of the growth of prostatic cancer cells. Recent data show that LNCaP cells express large amounts of androgen receptors (AR) mrna that are under negative control by androgen [13]. LNCaP cells also posses epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors that are up-regulated by androgen to secrete EGF and transforming growth factor (TGF -α) and to respond to EGF with increased growth [14]. The binding of EGF to its membrane tyrosine kinase receptor activates many second messenger pathways and modulates the activity of several intracellular kinases by tyrosine phosphorylation [15]. EGF reduces the secretion of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and prostate-specific antigens (PSA) and interferes with the androgen regulation of these proteins. PAP that is also capable of dephosphorylating phosphotyrosyl proteins is down-regulated by androgens. PSA also can dephosphorylate phosphotyrosine proteins, and was shown to dephosphorylate EGF receptor [16]. It may be possible that APP interferes with androgen receptor or EGF receptor so that EGF or TGF-α cannot be secreted. In this case, APP may interfere with second messenger pathway and the cell growth can be inhibited. While the biochemistry and molecular biology of protein 12 kinases have progressed, it has been much more difficult to understand their function in intact cells. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Author would like to thank Dr. Sanski Konno for his assistance in cytosolic protein phosphorylation. REFERENCES 1. Huggins, C., Hodges, C.V. ( 1941) Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res. 1: 293-297. 2. Sica, G., Fabbroni, L., Castagnetta, L., Cacciatore, M. And Pavone-Macaluso, M. ( 1989) Antiproliferative effects of interferons on human prostate carcinoma cell lines. Urol. Res. 17: 111-115. 3. Sherwood, E.R., Ford, T.R., Lee, C. and Kozlowski, M. ( 1990) Therapeutic efficacy of recombinant tumor necrosis factor in an experimental model of human prostatic carcinoma. J. Biol. Response Mod. 9: 44-52. 4. van Moorselaar, R.J.A., van Stratum, P., Borm, G., Debruyne, F.M.J. and Schalken, J.A. ( 1991) Differential antiproliferative activities of alpha- and gamma-interferon and tumor necrosis factor alone or in combinations against two prostate cancer xenografts transplanted in nude mice. The prostate 18: 331-334. 5. Abolhassani, M., Muraki, J. and Chiao, J.W. ( 1989) Purification of a suppressor lymphokine (SL) from a human T cell line. Immunol. Invest. 18: 741-751. 6. Abolhassani, M., and Chiao, J.W. (1991) Purification and characterization of a human leukemia cellderived immunosuppressive factor. Prep. Biochem. 21: 25-33. 7. Abolhassani, M., and Chiao, J.W. ( 1991) Identification of a co-stimulatory factor for human T cell proliferation. Cancer Let. 56: 71-76. 8. Abolhassani, M., and Chiao, J.W. ( 1995) Human prostatic carcinoma cells modulate lymphocyte proliferation by an immunosuppressive activity. Oncol. Rep. 2: 811-813. 9. Abolhassani, M., and Chiao, J.W. ( 1995) Antiproliferative effect of a prostatic cell-derived activity on the human androgen-dependent prostatic carcinoma cell line LNCaP. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 15: 179-185. 10. Ullrich, A. And Schlessinger, J. ( 1990) Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. Cell 61: 203-212.

11. Zicky, Y. ( 1989) The insulin receptor: structure and function. Crit. Rev. Biochem. MoL Biol. 24: 217269. 12. Konno, S., Cherry, J., Tazaki, H., Mallouh, C. And Chiao, J.W. ( 1997) Effects of protein kinase and phosphatase inhibitors on the growth of human prostate cancer cells. Med. Sci. Res. 25: 353-354. 13. Wolf, D., Herzinger, T., Herminkink, H., Blaschke, D., and Harz, W. ( 1993) Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of human androgen receptor by androgen. MoL Endocrinol. 7: 924-936. 14. Schuurmans, A.L.G., Bolt, J., and Mulder, E. ( 1988) Androgens stimulate both growth rate and epidermal growth factor receptor activity of the human prostate tumor cell line LNCaP. Prostate 12: 55-63. 15. Carpenter, G., and Cohen, S. (1990) Epidermal growth factor. I Biol. Chem. 265: 7709-7712. 16. Lin, M-F., and Clinton, G.M. ( 1988) The epidermal growth factor receptor from prostate cells is dephosphorylated by a prostate-specific phosphotyrosyl phosphatase. Mot Cell. Biol. 8: 5477-5485. 13