Growth promoting treatment: When discretion is the better part of value David B. Allen, MD Professor of Pediatrics University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Head of Division of Diabetes and Endocrinology Director, Endocrine/Diabetes Fellowship Program UW American Family Children s Hospital - Madison
Disclosures I have no conflicts to report I have been conflicted about this topic for 30 years By the end of this lecture, I hope you feel conflicted too
Imminent challenge: how to push back against the push back Quartz Insurance Growth Hormone Coverage policy: Excluded: Medications, including Growth Hormone, used to treat growth retardation except when endogenous production of growth hormone is inadequate and clinical criteria are met. Coverage is not extended for short stature syndrome or any other related growth abnormalities.
Key definitions and distinctions GH augmentation vs. GH replacement Cost-conscious vs. cost-effective Critical thinking vs. criticism
Toward cost-conscious hgh-for-height treatment Candidacy criteria Alternative treatment options Therapeutic objectives Minimizing risk Outcomes: targeted usage lowest effective dosage reduced treatment duration Allen DB. Horm Res Paediatr. 2017;87(3):145-152
How did we get here?
From hormonal replacement to enhancement Daniels N. Equality of what: welfare, resources, or capabilities? Philosophical Studies 54:79-95;1988 Medical services deserved to treat disease and disability and not to enhance performance or appearance Role of medicine to make people normal competitors, not equal competitors Expansive biotechnology - treatments for disease are found by physicians and industry, to have benefits in other situations that do not fit clearly into the role of medicine
If hgh-for-height is effective - GH responsiveness, not just GHD, a criterion for hgh treatment. Stature-handicapped children considered for treatment. No societal obligation to increase height > lower adult normal range Objective: reduce burdens of severe short stature without endorsing heightism Letters to Editor Responses: No way: GHD = treatment, non-ghd = enhancement Not going to work: Ethics should wait until efficacy trials completed Allen DB, Fost NC. J Pediatrics 117:16-21; January 1990
Assumptions propelling hgh expansion Disability linked to short stature alleviated by hghinduced height gain Pharmacological hgh is safe during and after treatment Interests of parents, prescribers, and industry should and would be supported by payers
Safety-sales linkage in the National Cooperative Growth Study: 34 PubMed NCGS articles about positive hgh treatment,13 about safety Most in non-fda-approved (at the time) conditions Opinion leaders influence prescribing Need for long-term post-treatment surveillance Allen DB. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jan;95(1):52-5
Post-marketing investigation expert opinion accepted practice sufficient market? indication Childhood GHD Idiopathic/familial short stature Constitutional growth delay IUGR Turner syndrome Skeletal dysplasias Hypochondroplasia, hypophosphatemia, etc. Noonan syndrome Prader-Willi syndrome Down syndrome Adult GH deficiency Catabolic states Post-operative wound healing Burns Indications approved by the FDA Regenerative/repair states Fractures Peripheral nerve damage Neural tube defects Spina bifida Myelomeningocele Chronic illness GC-dependent disorders Chronic renal failure Cystic fibrosis AIDS wasting Inflammatory bowel disease Aging Athletic healing/enhancement Significant off-label prescribing
FDA -> shortness from multiple diagnoses entitled to treatment Augmentation endocrinology sanctioned Concern -> vulnerability of open-endedness Initiation entitlement: diagnostically qualified but nondisabled children Therapeutic goal: maximum height vs. normal height Allen DB, Fost N. J Pediatr. 2004 May;144(5):648-52.
Cost conscious candidacy
Focusing Illusion: when judgments about a characteristic derived from a subset are applied globally to all subjects with the characteristic. Sandberg DE, Gardner M. Ped Clin North Amer 2015; 62: 963-982.
Decision point A: hgh treatment initiation? Evidence-based counseling: Child s height is likely not the primary factor affecting psychological well-being (focused illusion) hgh -> modest height increase but will not predictably improve psychosocial well-being Benefit/risk/cost analysis uncertain for otherwise healthy child Default to non-treatment if child of assenting age dissents
Cost-conscious treatment choices
Is it reasonable to interrupt hgh treatment?
Decision Point B: interrupt hgh to reassess need for and assent to continued treatment? Evidence: most IGHD patients have a normal GH test after puberty Standard practice: treat to epiphyseal closure or satisfactory height Alternative: Trial off hgh for IGHD/ISS children at puberty followed by observation and re-testing if needed Obtain adolescent informed assent to ongoing hgh treatment Minimize use of hgh making children destined for normal stature taller than others
Allen DB, Cuttler L. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1220-8.
Approximate Projections of the Growth Trajectory and Adult Height Associated with Various Treatments for Short Stature
Treatment of SS: benefits and burdens Allen DB, Cuttler L. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1220-8.
Cost-conscious therapeutic objectives
How tall is tall enough?
Therapeutic objective: maximal height or normal height? Adult QOL is normal in short people and not predictably improved by hgh-mediated height gain Thus, endpoints cannot be differentiated by QOL outcomes Last 1 3% of height gain increases expenditure by 20% No coherent entitlement to communal resources to be made taller than other short normal people Proper therapeutic goal: normal opportunity range Families can use personal resources for additional treatment Allen DB. Growth hormone therapy for short stature: is the benefit worth the burden? Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):343-8
Cost-conscious risk avoidance
Prior assumptions: hgh safety? hgh: Possible Increased Risk of Death [Posted 12/22/2010] March 20, 2011 Are children dying for an inch or two? The ethics and dangers of treating children with height-boosting drugs By Alice Dreger Does the FDA really believe that a height increase is worth an increased risk of death, or worth any risk to a healthy child, when it has never been shown to have any actual medical benefit?
Morbidity and mortality post-hgh treatment Confounder: disorders treated with hgh have higher morbidity and mortality risk Aggregate evidence does not support association between hgh exposure and allcause mortality Any potential risk may be related to dosage Counseling about ongoing studies of longterm safety advised
Steps to minimize potential hgh risk Aiming for lowest effective hgh dose and duration low dose initiation growth rate-based titration IGF-1 monitoring? Interrupt + discontinue hgh treatment? Informed assent emphasizing evidence-based approach to growth concerns
Reconciling evidence, value, and resource allocation IOM: value (outcome quality/cost) should guide health care redesign Evidence-based decisions should guide innovations (GRADE approach) Critical benefit assessment should be balanced with potential risk Grimberg A, Divall S, Polychronakos C, Allen DB, et al. Horm Res Paediatr 86 (6): 361-426; 2016
Best defense is good offense: asserting the value of cost-conscious hgh treatment Height-promotion prescribing practices that: Recommend non-treatment for most short children Initiate hgh treatment only after evidence-based informed assent Utilize alternative less costly options when possible Take steps to minimize hgh treatment duration and dosage Objective: lessen disability of extreme short stature while resisting enhancement of normal adult stature. Allen DB. Horm Res Paediatr. 2017;87(3):145-152.
Thank you this award and for the opportunity to present