CDC s Approach to Fast Track Laboratory Diagnosis for Persons at Risk of Drug Resistant TB: Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance (MDDR) Service

Similar documents
Laboratory s Role in the Battle Against Drug Resistant Tuberculosis

Ken Jost, BA, has the following disclosures to make:

Diagnosis of TB: Laboratory Ken Jost Tuesday April 9, 2013

Laboratory Diagnosis for MDR TB

TB Intensive San Antonio, Texas November 11 14, 2014

Diagnosis of TB: Laboratory Ken Jost Tuesday April 1, 2014

MIC = Many Inherent Challenges Sensititre MIC for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

WELCOME. Lab Talk: What a Nurse Hears. April 18, NTNC Annual Meeting Lab Talk: What a Nurse Hears

TB Nurse Case Management. March 7-9, Diagnosis of TB: Ken Jost Wednesday March 7, 2012

DNA sequencing for the confirmation of rifampin resistance detected by Cepheid Xpert

Stacy White, PhD May 12, TB for Community Providers. Phoenix, Arizona

Harmonizing the Use of Molecular & Culture-based DST of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The ABC s of AFB s Laboratory Testing for Tuberculosis. Gary Budnick Connecticut Department of Public Health Mycobacteriology Laboratory

Mycobacteria Diagnostic Testing in Manitoba. Dr. Michelle Alfa Medical Director, DSM Clin Micro Discipline

Rapid Diagnostic Techniques for Identifying Tuberculosis Ken Jost November 13, 2008

Laboratory Diagnosis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex. Objectives

Drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis KRISTEN DICKS, MD, MPH DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

Case presentation. Dr Connie Haley, MD, MPH Dr Gautam Kalyatanda, MD

Shah: Discordant Growth- Molecular Rifampin Resistance 2/27/16 RELAPSED FAILED

Diagnosis of drug resistant TB

Receipt within 1 day of specimen collection. Report AFB b smear result within 1 day from receipt of specimen

Maha R Farhat, MD MSc Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School. I have no financial or other potential conflicts of interest to disclose

WSLH Testing and Surveillance Updates

Optimising patient care in MDR TB with existing molecular screening tests in high burden countries

The current state of knowledge: genotypic vs phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST)

TB 101 Disease, Clinical Assessment and Lab Testing

Rapid Diagnosis and Detection of Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis

Communication between clinician and laboratory Molecular detection of M. tuberculosis complex

Frances Jamieson, MD and Kevin May, BSc November 15 th,

TB is Local. Barry Chin, Boston Globe, 10/15/2008. * BUT only in appropriate setting

Objectives. TB Laboratory Methods

Diagnosis and Management of Active Tuberculosis

Overview of Mycobacterial Culture, Identification, and Drug Susceptibility Testing

Received 4 June 2013; Final revision 1 August 2013; Accepted 30 August 2013; first published online 27 September 2013

Molecular assays in Tuberculosis. Jatin Yegurla Junior resident

The Molecular MDR Screen is an Important Tool in the Diagnosis and Initiation of Appropriate Therapy in TB Patients in the State of Florida

Pyrosequencing Experience from Mumbai, India. Camilla Rodrigues MD Consultant Microbiologist Hinduja Hospital,Mumbai India

Online Annexes (5-8)

White Paper Application

DST for detection of DR TB - roll out of Xpert in South Africa and overview of other technologies: what are the gaps?

Whole Genome Next Genera/on Sequencing of TB in a Public Health Laboratory: A New Diagnos/c Era

Online Annexes (5-8)

Experience with Pyrazinamide and Rifampin Regimens for Latent TB Infection

Grant Summary Report: Expansion of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for TB In Public Health Laboratories

Scott Lindquist MD MPH Tuberculosis Medical Consultant Washington State DOH and Kitsap County Health Officer

TB/HIV 2 sides of the same coin. Dr. Shamma Shetye, MD Microbiology Metropolis Healthcare, Mumbai

TB Laboratory for Nurses

Transmission of MDR/XDR Tuberculosis in Shanghai. Qian Gao Shanghai Medical College Fudan University

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CLINICAL LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM

Global epidemiology of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Factors contributing to the epidemic of MDR/XDR-TB. CHIANG Chen-Yuan MD, MPH, DrPhilos

NAAT in the Clinical Laboratory and Impact on Infection Control 9 th National Conference on Laboratory Aspects of Tuberculosis APHL

Rapid Diagnosis of Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis by Use of a Reverse Line Blot Hybridization Assay

Molecular Methods in the Diagnosis of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Dr Sahajal Dhooria

The Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis

Public Health Mycobacteriology (TB) Laboratory Testing Services

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Understanding this new diagnostic and who will have access to it

Elizabeth A. Talbot MD Assoc Professor, ID and Int l Health Deputy State Epidemiologist, NH GEISELMED.DARTMOUTH.EDU GEISELMED.DARTMOUTH.

Recognizing MDR-TB in Children. Ma. Cecilia G. Ama, MD 23 rd PIDSP Annual Convention February 2016

Evaluation of the MTBDRsl Test for Detection of Second-Line-Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Trends in Testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex from US Public Health Laboratories,

Frances Morgan, PhD October 21, Comprehensive Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Their Contacts October 19 22, 2015 Wichita, KS

Managing Complex TB Cases Diana M. Nilsen, MD, RN

CDPH - CTCA Joint Guidelines Guideline for Micobacteriology Services In California

Supplementary Appendix

I. Demographic Information GENDER NUMBER OF CASES PERCENT OF CASES. Male % Female %

Principles of laboratory diagnosis of M. tuberculosis. Anne-Marie Demers, MD, FRCPC 11 September 2017

DNA FINGERPRINTING. Barry N. Kreiswirth, PhD Director, PHRI TB Center

LABORATORY METHODS: TUBERCULOSIS DIAGNOSIS

Genotypic and phenotypic M. tuberculosis resistance: guiding clinicians to prescribe the correct regimens

Molecular tests for rapid detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

MSF Field Research. Diagnosis and management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. South African adults. Hughes, J; Osman, M

Detection of Multidrug Resistance and Characterization of Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Raichur District, India

Case Study: TB-HIV co-infection

How best to structure a laboratory network with new technologies

Treatment of TB. David Griffith, MD May 12, TB for Community Providers. Phoenix, Arizona

DRUG RESISTANCE IN TUBERCULOSIS

Wei-Lun Huang,* Ting-Lin Chi, Mei-Hua Wu, and Ruwen Jou*

Evolution of XDR-TB. A. Willem Sturm Interim Director K-RITH Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine University of KwaZulu-Natal

Alere q A Molecular Platform for Global Health Diagnostics

Treatment of Active Tuberculosis

TB: Management in an era of multiple drug resistance. Bob Belknap M.D. Denver Public Health November 2012

Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Molecular Epidemiology: An Overview

TB Laboratory Services

MULTIDRUG- RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS. Dean Tsukayama Hennepin County Medical Center Hennepin County Public Health Clinic

Progress Report March 2016

TB BASICS: PRIORITIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS

Analysis. Answers. Action. Saturday Night Fever. Shaka Brown Capital Congress

Crisis Connections Crisis Line Phone Worker Training (Online/Onsite) Winter 2019

Multi-country surveillance project on fluoroquinolones and PZA resistance

Essential Mycobacteriology Laboratory Services in the Era of MDR- and XDR-TB: A TB Controller s Perspective

Y. Hu, 1,2 L. Xu, 2,3 Y. L. He, 2,3 Y. Pang, 4 N. Lu, 2,3 J. Liu, 1 J. Shen, 1 D. M. Zhu, 1 X. Feng, 1 Y. W. Wang, 5 and C. Yang 2,3. 1.

PCR and direct amplification for tuberculosis diagnosis. Emmanuelle CAMBAU University Paris Diderot, APHP, Saint Louis-Lariboisière Hospital,

Bedaquiline and delamanid combination as part of a MDR-TB treatment regimen: Current evidence and practices

Evaluation of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for TB (Option B Study)

A ten-year evolution of a multidrugresistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) outbreak in an HIV-negative context, Tunisia ( )

Prevalence and molecular characteristics of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Beijing, China: 2006 versus 2012

Analysis of mutational pattern in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) in a geographically isolated northeastern region of India

National Xpert MTB/RIF Programme

AFB Identification Texas Approach

HHS Public Access Author manuscript Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 April 01.

Transcription:

CDC s Approach to Fast Track Laboratory Diagnosis for Persons at Risk of Drug Resistant TB: Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance (MDDR) Service Beverly Metchock, DrPH, D(ABMM) Team Lead, Reference Laboratory Division of TB Elimination February 28, 2014

MDDR Service at CDC: Rationale (2008-2009) Clinical/Program Make rapid confirmation of MDR TB available Make laboratory testing data available to clinicians about SLD resistance in cases of RMP- R or MDR TB New technologies may fill the role in the future but demand exists now Development Continuous correlation of molecular (genotypic) results and DST (phenotypic) results Addition of new drugs and alleles Research Determination of mechanisms of resistance Fine tune DST

MDDR Service History Implemented in September 2009 (CLIA compliant)* DNA sequencing, ABI 3130xl MTBC isolates Anticipated workload - conservative estimate, 1-2 isolates/week Loci examined for INH, RMP, FQ, and injectables Loci for EMB and PZA incorporated October 2010 MDDR V 2.0 implemented in June 2012 Incorporation of pyrosequencing screen (INH and RMP only) MTBC isolates and NAAT(+) sediments (not raw specimens) * Campbell, PJ, et al. 2011. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2032-2041

Criteria for MDDR Testing Version 2.0* Isolate or NAAT (+) sediment (not raw specimen) High-risk patients (RMP-R, MDR TB) From population with high rates of drug resistance Exposed to DR case (Expanded MDDR) Failing therapy Cases of public health importance Impact on public health measures & public health response Known RMP Resistance Conventional or molecular test by submitter Mixed or non-viable cultures Other Reasons *June 2012

Rifampin Isoniazid Isoniazid Ethambutol Pyrazinamide Fluoroquinolones Amikacin, Kanamycin, Kanamycin Capreomycin Capreomycin MDDR Service: Sanger Sequencing Drugs and Genes for Panel rpob (81bp region) MDR TB XDR TB inha (-15) katg (Ser315) embb (Met306, Gly406) pnca (promoter and coding regions) gyra (coding region) rrs (nt1401/1402,1484) eis (promoter region) tlya (coding region)

http://www.cdc.gov/tb/topic/laboratory/mddrusersguide.pdf CDC s Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance Service Isolate or NAAT(+) Sediment Received for MDDR Molecular Analysis (PSQ; PSQ then Sanger; Sanger)* Molecular Results (Interim Report[s]) Conventional DST 2-3 day turnaround time ~35 day turnaround time Molecular + Conventional DST Results (Final Report) *based on information supplied on request form

Differences in Testing Platforms (simplified version) Sanger sequencing Identifies actual mutations Pyrosequencing Identifies actual mutations Minor or mixed populations are harder to detect Sequence small regions of DNA GeneXpert MTB/RIF Detects wild type sequence and thus may miss mixed populations; cannot distinguish synonymous mutations from clinically relevant mutations Hain Interpretation of banding pattern may give indication of actual mutation

State Public Health Laboratory Submissions to RLT 800 700 Number of submissions 600 500 400 300 200 100 DST only MDDR only (DNA) DST and MDDR PZA only Total 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

MDDR TAT 2013 Indicator Goal JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV N 111 130 135 159 Range (d) 1-5 1-4 1-8 1-7 Mean (d) <=3 d 2 2 2 2 Median (d) 1 1 1 1 80% by: 4 d 3 2 3 3 %<=4 d 80% 99.1% 100% 99.3% 89.3%

MDDR results for INH and RMP, 2013* *provisional data No. % INH-S, RMP-S 303 56.7 INH-R, RMP-S 60 11.2 INH-S, RMP-R 18 3.4 INH-R, RMP-R 90 16.8 No amplification 47 8.8 Not done / outbreak 17 3.2 Total 535 ~50% PSQ (INH and RMP) only; of these, 5% reflexed to Sanger (full panel) due to detection of RMP=R ~30% processed sediments; 80% successfully amplified 5% DNA

CASES

MGIT broth Previous TB Treatment From a country with a high rate of drug resistance (China) University Student Collection Date: 1/17/2014 (Friday) CDC contacted: 2/6/2014 (Thursday) Date sent to CDC: 2/6/2014 (Thursday) Date received at CDC: 2/7/2014 (Friday)

Pyrosequencing Report issued 2/10/2014 Locus (region) examined Result Interpretation rpob (RRDR) Probably Rifampin susceptible. (97% of RMP-R isolates have a mutation at this locus.) inha (promotor) Cannot rule out INH resistance. (86% of INH-R isolates have a katg (Ser315 codon) mutation at one or both of these loci.) MDDR testing (Sanger sequencing, complete panel) will not be performed because mutations associated with RMP resistance were not detected. Contact laboratory if this testing is required for clinical reasons. TAT from specimen collection date: 24 days TAT within CDC: 3 days

NAAT+ sputum sediment Previous TB Treatment From a country with a high rate of drug resistance (PERU) Collection Date: 12/29/2013 (Sunday) CDC contacted: 12/30/2013 (Monday) Date sent to CDC: 1/2/2014 (Thursday) Date received at CDC: 1/3/2014 (Friday)

Pyrosequencing Report issued 1/6/2014 Locus (region) examined Result Interpretation rpob (RRDR) inha (promotor) katg (Ser315 codon) Mutation: TCG>TTG; Ser531Leu Mutation: AGC>ACC; Ser315Thr Rifampin resistant Isoniazid resistant MDDR testing (Sanger sequencing, complete panel) is in progress because a mutation associated with RMP resistance was detected. Report to follow. TAT from specimen collection date: 7 days TAT within CDC: 3 days

CDC Sanger Sequencing Report issued 1/7/2014 Locus (region) examined Result Interpretation rpob (RRDR) inha (promotor) katg (Ser315 codon) embb (Met306, Gly406, other) pnca (promotor, coding region) gyra (QRDR) rrs (1400 region) eis (promotor) tlya (entire ORF) Mutation: TCG>TTG; Ser531Leu Mutation: AGC>ACC; Ser315Thr Mutation: ATG>ATC; Met306Ile Mutation: GCG>GAG; Ala146Glu Mutation: GAC>GGC; Asp94Gly Mutations: A1401G and C1402T Mutation: C-14T Frameshift mutation Rifampin resistant Isoniazid resistant Ethambutol resistant Likely PZA resistant Ofloxacin resistant Amikacin and Kanamycin resistant; Possibly Capreomycin resistant

LJ slant Known MDR (MGIT DST X3) Collection Date: 11/8/2013 CDC contacted: 2/5/2014 (Wednesday) Date sent to CDC: 2/6/2014 (Thursday) Date received at CDC: 2/7/2014 (Friday)

Sanger Sequencing Report issued 2/10/2014 Locus (region) examined Result Interpretation rpob (RRDR) inha (promotor) katg (Ser315 codon) embb (Met306, Gly406, other) pnca (promotor, coding region) gyra (QRDR) rrs (1400 region) eis (promotor) tlya (entire ORF) Mutation: TCG>TTG; Ser531Leu Mutation: AGC>ACC; Ser315Thr Silent and Neutral mutations Mutation: ATT>ACT; Ile133Thr Rifampin resistant Isoniazid resistant Cannot rule out Ethambutol resistance.(79% of isolates have a mutation at this locus.) Cannot rule out PZA resistance; significance of this mutation is unknown Cannot rule out FQ resistance. (80% of FQ-R isolates have a mutation at this locus.) Cannot rule out resistance to injectable drugs (KAN, AMK, CAP). TAT from specimen collection date: 94 days TAT within CDC: 3 days

Neck aspirate sediment Known RMP-R (GeneXpert, probe B) Collection Date: 8/28/2013 (Wednesday) CDC contacted: 9/6/2013 (Friday) Date sent to CDC: 9/9/2013 (Monday) Date received at CDC: 9/11/2013 (Wednesday)

Sanger Sequencing Report issued 9/13/2013 Locus (region) examined Result Interpretation rpob (RRDR) inha (promotor) katg (Ser315 codon) Silent Mutation: TTC>TTT; Phe514Phe Probably RMP susceptible. (96% of RMP-R isolates have a mutation, other than the one detected, at this locus.) Cannot rule out INH resistance. (86% of INH-R isolates have a mutation at one or both of these loci.) embb (Met306, Gly406, other) Cannot rule out EMB resistance.(79% of EMB-R isolates have a mutation at this locus.) pnca (promotor, coding region) Cannot rule out PZA resistance. gyra (QRDR) rrs (1400 region) eis (promotor) tlya (entire ORF) Cannot rule out FQ resistance. (80% of FQ-R isolates have a mutation at this locus.) Cannot rule out resistance to injectable drugs (KAN, AMK, CAP). TAT from specimen collection date: 16 days TAT within CDC: 2 days

Review of Cases Rapidly rule out resistance in a case of public health importance Rapidly identify MDR / XDR TB Rapidly confirm MDR TB Rapidly rule out RMP-R

Acknowledgements DTBE Laboratory Branch BMetchock@cdc.gov (404) 639-1285 The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD & TB Prevention Division of Tuberculosis Elimination