Clinical Perspective: How Are We Doing From a Clinician s Point of View

Similar documents
Cardiotoxicities of Cancer in Childhood Cancer Survivors

Cardiovascular outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer

The Current Pediatric Oncology Landscape

Late Effects in Pediatric Cancer Survivors

Chemotherapy- Associated Heart Failure. M. Birhan Yılmaz M.D, FESC Professor of Medicine Department of Cardiology Cumhuriyet University Sivas, TURKEY

Cardiotoxicity: The View of the Cardiologist

CV Strategies to Mitigate Cardiotoxicity Pharmacologic Therapy Heart Failure Medications and Statins and For How Long

Anthracyclines in the elderly breast cancer patients

Practice Based Evidence for Treatment of Pregnancy and Anthracycline Cardiomyopathy

The right heart: the Cinderella of heart failure

Can point of care cardiac biomarker testing guide cardiac safety during oncology trials?

Downloaded from:

Medical Late Effects of Childhood Cancer

Cardiotoxicity from Chemotherapy : From Early Predictors to Therapeutics

Multiparametric Mapping for Assessment of Cancer Therapy Related Cardiotoxicity

03/14/2019. Scope of the Problem. Objectives

Diagnosis is it really Heart Failure?

Risk Factors for Future Cardiac Diseases in Childhood Cancer Survivors

Selective Cardiac Myosin Activators in Heart Failure

Cardio-Oncology at MHI. Kasia Hryniewicz, M.D.

Cardiotoxic Effects of Chemotherapy on Pediatric and Adult Survivors of Cancer

Anthracycline cardiomypathy in breast cancer: detection and prevention in high-risk patients

Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure: Now for all Patients?

Cured of Cancer but now Let s Heal the Heart An exploration into the effects of cancer on the heart

Cancer survivors. Half of Cancer Survivors Die of Other Conditions. Cause of Death in Cancer Survivors

Non-Anthracycline Adjuvant Therapy: When to Use?

Frequency and risk factors of subclinical cardiotoxicity after anthracycline therapy in children: a systematic review

T. Suithichaiyakul Cardiomed Chula

original article abstract

Vasospasm and cardiac ischemia (Type 3 ) Hypertension Hypotension Arrhythmias Miscellaneous ( pericardial inflammation, valvular abnormalities )

Do we have to change our anti-cancer strategy in case of cardiac toxicity? Guy Jerusalem, MD, PhD

At the Heart of the Matter: Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in Childhood Cancer Survivors

Chronic Disease Working Group CCSS Investigator Meeting 2015

Cardiac Toxicities Associated with Cancer Treatment

Roohi Ismail-Khan, MD, MS

How to Evaluate the Heart of Elderly Patients

Cardiac Late Effects and Prevention Strategies for Children Treated with Anthracyclines

Disclosures. Overview. Goal statement. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 5/22/17

Do All Patients With An ICD Indication Need A BiV Pacing Device?

Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Young Cancer Patients: The Role of Carnitine

Prevention by dexrazoxane (Cardioxane) Relevance to breast cancer treatment

: A Study Examining the Prevalence of Transthyretin Mutations in Subjects Suspected of Having Cardiac Amyloidosis

April 22, 2017 Abraham Rothman, MD

Managing LV Impairment with Cancer Therapies

THE RIGHT VENTRICLE IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION R. DRAGU

Disclosures. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author. Contact them for permission to reprint and/or distribute.

HYPERTENSION AND HEART FAILURE

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide as a Marker for Cardiac Dysfunction in Anthracycline-Treated Children

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

Optimal blockade of the Renin- Angiotensin-Aldosterone. in chronic heart failure

Diastolic Heart Failure

CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVOR STUDY Long-Term Morbidity in Survivors of Childhood Leukemia with Down Syndrome Analysis Concept Proposal

Follow-up of the CUPID Gene Therapy Studies A Roadmap for Enhancement of Myocardial Metabolism and Viability Roger J. Hajjar, MD

From PARADIGM-HF to Clinical Practice. Waleed AlHabeeb, MD, MHA Associate Professor of Medicine President of the Saudi Heart Failure Group

Prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

A patient with decompensated HF

The Therapeutic Potential of Novel Approaches to RAAS. Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego

ESCBM meeting 2018, Prague Utility of Cardiac Biomarkers in Clinical Heart Failure Care. Md. Shahidul Islam, M.D., Ph.D

2011 HCM Guideline Data Supplements

Understanding and Development of New Therapies for Heart Failure - Lessons from Recent Clinical Trials -

Peri-operative Troponin Measurements - Pathophysiology and Prognosis

UPDATES IN MANAGEMENT OF HF

Left ventricular non-compaction: the New Cardiomyopathy on the Block

Advanced Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy Patients

Disclosures. Speaker s bureau: Research grant: Advisory Board: Servier International, Bayer, Merck Serono, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lupin

Genotype Positive/ Phenotype Negative: Is It a Disease?

Treating the patient with acute heart failure. What do we really know? Principles of acute heart failure treatment

Breast Cancer and the Heart

Minimally invasive therapies for the mitral valve: How will you incorporate into your clinical practice? Guilherme F.

Heart Failure. Cardiac Anatomy. Functions of the Heart. Cardiac Cycle/Hemodynamics. Determinants of Cardiac Output. Cardiac Output

Why? What? When? How? Dr C Fryer FRCPC) Surveillance

Proceedings of the 34th World Small Animal Veterinary Congress WSAVA 2009

CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICITY INDUCED BY ANTITUMOUR THERAPY. Florian SCOTTE, MDPhD Suresnes, France

Heart Failure with Preserved EF (HFPEF) Epidemiology and management

SIOG APAC th to 13 th July

Troponin Assessment. Does it Carry Clinical Message? Stefan Blankenberg. University Heart Center Hamburg

CARDIOVASCULAR CONSIDERATIONS IN THE GERIATRIC PATIENT WITH CANCER

Patterns of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Chronic Heart Failure: The Role of Inadequate Ventricular Hypertrophy

Post Operative Troponin Leak: David Smyth Christchurch New Zealand

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Overview & Update on the Utilization of the Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Failure

HESI Technical Committee on Cardiovascular Safety: Advancing the clinical relevance of preclinical assessments

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

Cardio-oncology: Applying new echo technology to guide therapy

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodeling and function:

Dr. Hany M. Abo-Haded

Ejection Fraction in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Diastolic Heart Failure or Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

c Ischemia (30 min) Reperfusion (8 w) Supplementary Figure bp 300 bp Ischemia (30 min) Reperfusion (4 h) Dox 20 mg/kg i.p.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: beyond gradient and wall thickness

Could care really be personalized: Genes, biomarkers or just one size fits all? Aldo P Maggioni Florence, Italy

Epidemiology/Biostatistics Working Group Report

Catheter-based mitral valve repair MitraClip System

Drug Comparison: Lartruvo TM (Olaratumab) for Soft Tissue Sarcoma By: Majd Abedrabbo, PharmD Candidate 2018 Fairleigh Dickinson University School of

Disclosures. Objectives. SK continued. Two of my patients. First and foremost, why is this important??? 10/26/2016

2/15/2017. Disclosures. Heart Failure = Big Problem. Heart Failure Update Reducing Hospitalizations and Improving Patient Outcomes 02/18/2017

Echo assessment of the failing heart

Biomarkers in the Age of Sacubitril/Valsa rten: Has the PARADIGM Changed

2016 ESC Heart Failure Guidelines: what is new? Piotr Ponikowski Wroclaw, Poland

STEMI Stents What next? Arshad Khan - HNE Clinical Research Fellow. Supervisors: Prof Boyle and Attia.

Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (U24 CA55727)

Transcription:

Clinical Perspective: How Are We Doing From a Clinician s Point of View Steven E. Lipshultz, MD Department of Pediatrics University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Holtz Children s Hospital of the University of Miami-Jackson Memorial Medical Center Miami, FL

Stages in the Course of Pediatric Ventricular Dysfunction Preventive Strategies: Progressively less effective as the number increases. Primary prevention is possible at number 1. Secondary prevention is possible at numbers 2, 3, and 4. Treatment Strategies: Greater impact with higher numbers but longer effects with lower numbers. Treatment is possible at numbers 4 and 5 to reduce sequelae. Biomarkers/Surrogate Endpoints: Potentially more useful with lower numbers for alteration of course with interventions. Potentially more useful with higher numbers for decisions about transplantation. Lipshultz et al., Prog Pediatric Cardiol 2000

National Cancer Institute Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Cohort: LV Contractility (Health of Heart Muscle Cells) Doxorubicin-Treated Survivors of Childhood ALL (Average Age at Exposure = 4 Years Old) End of Dox Normal >12 papers said that early post-therapy dilated cardiomyopathy was reversible in the first few years after discontinuation of therapy Lipshultz et al., JCO 2005

DFCI Childhood ALL Cohort: LV Contractility (Health of Heart Muscle Cells) Long-Term Follow-Up is Essential to See if an Early Doxorubicin Hit Results in Late Cardiotoxicity Associated with Progressive Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality End of Dox DCM Normal Normal RCM Dashed lines are the upper and lower 95% CI from the predicted mean +/- 2 SE of the mean. >12 million US cancer survivors 1:640 >50% anthracycline exposed 20-year Survivors >8-fold increased CV mortality >4-fold increased sudden death 10-fold increased atherosclerosis 5-fold increased myocardial infarction CV mortality from 15 to 25 yrs after Dox 30-year Survivors >3-fold increased anthracycline associated CV mortality 15-fold higher rates of heart failure 10-fold higher rate of other CV disease 9-fold higher rate of stroke Lipshultz et al., JCO 2010 Tukenova et al., JCO 2010 Armstrong et al., JCO 2009 Reulen et al., JAMA 2010 Mertens et al., JCO 2001 Moller et al., JCO 2001 Lipshultz et al., NEJM 1991 Lipshultz et al., NEJM 1995 Mulrooney et al., BMJ 2009 Lipshultz et al., NEJM 2004 Lipshultz et al., JCO 2005 Oeffinger et al., NEJM 2006

CCSS: CHF Risk Increases with Anthracycline Dose Netherlands: CHF Risk Increases Over Time Blanco, et al., J Clin Oncol 2012 Van der Pal, et al., J Clin Oncol 2012

Estimates of (A) cumulative cardiovascular and (B) cardiac mortality in the French-British cohort and expected in the general population in France and Great Britain Tukenova et al., JCO 2010

Cardiotoxicity 8-Years After Anthracycline Treatment of Childhood Cancer LV Fractional Shortening (Heart Function) Contractility (Health of Heart Muscle) Afterload (Stress on Wall of the Heart) LV Wall Thickness LV Dimension Female Sex Cumul. Dose Age at Diagnosis Years Since Treatment Individual Dose Lipshultz et al., N Engl J Med 1995

Gender Difference Probability of late decreased contractility 8 years after childhood cancer 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 Female 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Male 0.0 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Cumulative doxorubicin dose (mg/m 2 ) Lipshultz et al., NEJM 1995

NCI DFCI: Effect of enalapril in delaying progression of depressed LVFS in long-term survivors of childhood cancer 6-10 yrs of benefit Normal NS NS Lipshultz, Lipsitz, Sallan, et al., JCO 2002

NCI DFCI Protocol 91-01: Continuous Doxorubicin Infusion is not Cardioprotective LV Fractional Shortening Adjusted for Age LV Posterior Wall Thickness Adjusted for BSA LV Mass Adjusted for BSA LV End-Systolic Dimension Adjusted for BSA *p-value for diff bet treatment groups; p<0.01 for diff bet baseline and follow-up time point Lipshultz, JCO 2003 Lipshultz, Pediatrics 2012

Mechanism of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity Free Radical mediated Doxorubicin Non-free radical mediated Free Radicals -Quinone-Semiquinone Recycling -Dox-Iron Recycling Antioxidant enzymes Thiol Groups Oxidative stress DNA Intercalation DNA-Topo II Dox Complex Subcellular Changes Cardiomyopathy Congestive heart failure? Impairs DNA replication Anti-tumor Effects

A DOX x 12 C B DOX x 7 D DEX+DOX x 12 DEX+DOX x 7 Light micrographs showing protective effect of dexrazoxane against DOXinduced cardiac lesions. Toluidine stain, x 400. Myocardial vacuolization and myofibrillar loss are less severe in rats treated with dexrazoxane/dox 12 mg/kg (C) and dexrazoxane/dox 7 mg/kg (D) than in rats treated with 12 mg/kg DOX (A) or 7 mg/kg DOX (B) alone. Herman, Lipshultz, et al., JCO 1999

NCI DFCI 9501 Cohort: Dexrazoxane Reduces Myocardial Injury ctnt elevated samples (%) 50 40 30 20 10 0 p<0.001 p=0.771 p=0.999 p=0.058 p<0.001 p<0.001 N=76 N=82 N=55 N=64 N=74 N=77 N=51 N=61 N=59 N=62 N=41 N=45 Day of doxorubicin treatment Doxorubicin Dexrazoxane/Doxorubicin Lipshultz et al., NEJM 2004

NCI DFCI ALL 9501 Cohort: Doxorubicin-Treated Children Girls are Cardioprotected by Dexrazoxane Left ventricular end systolic dimension Left ventricular fractional shortening Left ventricular end diastolic posterior wall thickness Lipshultz et al., Lancet Oncol 2010

McMurray, Pfeffer, Heart Failure Updates 2003 Ventricular Remodeling in Systolic and Diastolic Heart Failure as a Function of Time NCI DFCI ALL 9501 Cohort: Left Ventricular Thickness to Dimension Ratio in Doxorubicin- Treated Children; Dexrazoxane Blocks LV Remodeling Lipshultz et al., Lancet Oncol 2010

NCI DFCI 9501: Myocardial injury (measurable serum cardiac troponin T, 0.01ng/ml) during doxorubicin therapy is significantly related to lower left ventricular mass, wall thickness, and remodeling by echo more than 5 years later Abnormal NT-proBNP (Cardiomyopathy, Age >1 yr 100 pg/ml; Age < 1yr abnormal 150 pg/ml) during the first 90 days of doxorubicin therapy is not significantly related to lower left ventricular mass, wall thickness, and remodeling but is related to LV remodeling (thickness to dimension ratio) by echo 4 years later Lipshultz et al., JCO 2012

Second Study: NCI COG 9404 T-ALL: Dexrazoxane is Cardioprotective 3 Years After Doxorubicin LV Fractional Shortening LV Wall Thickness p-value for difference between groups LV Thickness-to-Dimension Ratio (LV Remodeling) p-value for differences in change of mean z-scores between groups Asselin, Lipshultz, ASCO 2012

Third Study: Dexrazoxane is Cardioprotective for Additive Cardiotoxicity NCI COG AOST 0121 Herceptin/Dox Additive Cardiotoxicity Protected by Dexrazoxane No Cardiomyopathy by NT-proBNP with Dexrazoxane CHF Normal Cardiomyopathy Both Groups Not Significantly Different from Normal Both Groups Below the Cardiomyopathy Threshold Kopp, Lipshultz, ASCO 2012 Ebb, Lipshultz, JCO 2012

Fourth Study: Dexrazoxane is Cardioprotective with Doxorubicin Dose Escalation: NCI COG P9754: No Fall in LVFS slope going from 450 to 600 mg/m 2 of Doxorubicin when Dexrazoxane is used Kopp, Lipshultz, ASCO 2012 Normal Both Groups Not Significantly Different from Normal

Increased Confirmed Mutations or Polymorphisms in mtdna of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes in 10-year ALL Survivors NCI DFCI 05-336 Mitochondrial Structure and Function in 10-year ALL Survivors Results: Significantly higher number of mtdna copies in DOX group compared to DOX/DEX group mtdna = mitochondrial DNA copies/cell CI = oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) NADH deydrogenase activity CIV = oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) cytochrome c oxidase activity OD = Optical Density Cancer survivors (n = 167): 64 sequence variants identified in 51 of 167 patients screened (avg = 0.31 sequence variants/patient; 30% of patients 1 change) *Potentially pathologic; ο polymorphism; *,ο Both Healthy controls (n = 56): 8 sequence variants in 7 of 56 patients (avg = 0.14 sequence variants/patient; 12.5% patients 1 change, Lipshultz, ASCO 2010 p = 0.008) Lipshultz, ASCO 2012

Hemochromatosis Gene Mutations Miranda et al. found that the heterozygous HFE knockout mice (Hfe+/-) showed mitochondrial degradation and increased mortality as compared to wild-type mice after chronic doxorubicin exposure. Wild type Hfe +/- Miranda, et al., Blood 2003

Lipshultz, ASCO 2011 Associations Between HFE Mutations and Myocardial Injury During DOX Therapy C282Y mutations were significantly associated with 8-fold increased risk of elevations in ctnt OR: Odds Ratio Abnormal ctnt: >0.01ng/ml; Abnormal NT-proBNP: 150 pg/ml in infants younger than 1 year or 100 pg/ml in children aged 1 year or older * Adjusted for dexrazoxane LV Characteristics by HFE Carrier 2 years after Randomization Carriers showed more dilated left ventricles, LV dysfunction, thinner posterior wall thickness, and reduced LV mass than normal

Anthracycline Summary Cardiotoxicity associated with cancer therapeutics can be pervasive, persistent, and progressive but missed clinically If you don t look, you don t know Tailored follow-up and therapies are needed and may be unique Continuous infusion doxorubicin is not cardioprotective Dexrazoxane is cardioprotective and allows safe dose escalation and the use of additive cardiotoxic therapies Genetic, environmental, and temporal factors interact to cause toxicity and identify high risk groups for safer treatment options and targeted interventions Persistent mitochondrial damage may relate to lifespan cardiotoxicity Validated surrogate cardiac endpoints are lacking Survivor cardiac monitoring delays heart failure and improves QOL Enalapril delays but does not prevent progressive survivor cardiotoxicity

Are Cardiac Safety Pharmacology Studies Providing What is Needed for Partially: Patient Safety? The relevance of information generated by in vitro experimental models to clinical doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Myocardial injury and other markers and cardiac function are often not concurrently evaluated. What is called contractility as a measurement is often more than an assessment of intrinsic myocardiocyte health. Usually it is load-dependent incorporating preload, afterload, and heart rate. No common definition of drug-induced cardiotoxicity has been established.

Long-term animal models are lacking. Few cardiac biomarkers have been validated as surrogate endpoints for clinically important cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular regulatory toxicology vs. nonregulatory safety pharmacology endpoints When used for discovery and drug development without understanding or a priori agreements are likely to be stultifying to development and have consequences. HR, BP, and ECG are rarely clinically meaningful as toxicology or safety endpoints clinically for lifespan toxicity vs. efficacy evaluations of a new agent. Understanding the course of pharmacodynamic properties, pathophysiological effects and mechanisms of adverse effects of a new agent are critical in lifespan toxicity vs. efficacy evaluations.