L infettivologia del 3 millennio: AIDS ed altro

Similar documents
HIV Update Allegra CPD Day Program Port Elizabeth Dr L E Nojoko

Antiretroviral Therapy: What to Start

Terapia del paciente naive con un régimen de Inhibidor de la proteasa Dr. Jose R Arribas IX Curso de avances en Infección VIH y hepatitis virales

Disclosures. Update on HIV Drug Therapy: A Case based Discussion. Case # 1: Dr. Grant has received grant support from BMS, Gilead, Janssen, and Viiv

ART: The New, The Old and The Ugly

Prima linea: dovremmo evitare i PI nella terapia di prima linea per i loro effetti non desiderati? Giuseppina Liuzzi

More Options, Some Opinions Initial Therapies for HIV Judith S. Currier, MD

Switching ARV Regimens: Managing Toxicity and Improving Tolerability; Switches & Class-Sparing Approaches

HIV - Therapy Principles

STRIBILD (aka. The Quad Pill)

ARVs in Development: Where do they fit?

HIV Treatment: New and Veteran Drugs Classes

HIV Treatment: State of the Art 2013

SINGLE. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects

Qué anuncian los nuevos trials?

HIV Treatment Update. Anton Pozniak Consultant Physician, Director of HIV Services Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London

Single Pill Combinations Versus Generics: Prescribing Practices in a New Healthcare Era

Comprehensive Guideline Summary

Antiretroviral Treatment 2014

SELECTING THE BEST ART FOR EACH PATIENT

Antiretroviral Drugs

Case 1 continued. Case 1 (cont) 12/8/16. MMAH Debate Panel Thursday, December 8, Case 1

TDF containing ART: Efficacy and Safety. Dr Lloyd B. Mulenga Adult Infectious Diseases Centre University Teaching Hospital Lusaka, Zambia

Starting and Switching ART: 2016

Switching antiretroviral therapy to safer strategies based on integrase inhibitors

Second-Line Therapy NORTHWEST AIDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER

Susan L. Koletar, MD

Are the current doses of ARV correct. Richard Elion MD Associate Adjunct Clinical Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)

DRUGS IN PIPELINE. Pr JC YOMBI UCL-AIDS REFERENCE CENTRE BREACH Sept 27, 2015

State of the ART: Integrase Inhibitors Clinical Data. Juan Berenguer Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM) Madrid, Spain

Update on HIV Drug Resistance. Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD Division of Infectious Diseases Brigham and Women s Hospital Harvard Medical School

Antiretroviral Therapy: Current Recommendations, New Drugs, and Novel Strategies. Joel Gallant, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

The use of antiretroviral agents during pregnancy in Canada and compliance with North-American guidelines

Bon Usage des Antirétroviraux dans l Infection par le VIH

The Use of Integrase Inhibitors In Latin America: From Guidelines to the Real World Ernesto Martínez B., MD Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases

Antiretroviral Therapy in 2016

INTERGRASE INHIBITORS- WHAT S NEW?

Integrase Inhibitors in the Treatment HIV-Infection. Andrew Zolopa, MD Stanford University

Treating HIV: When the Guidelines Don t Fit. Joel Gallant, MD, MPH. Southwest CARE Center Santa Fe, New Mexico

Didactic Series. CROI 2014 Update. March 27, 2014

CROI 2013: New Drugs for Treatment and PrEP

2017 NSTC Annual Meeting Eric Daar April 18, 2017

Pediatric HIV Infection and the Medical Management of Pregnant Women infected with HIV. Ernesto Parra, M.D., M.P.H.

Reduced Drug Regimens

The Integrase Inhibitor Drug Class: A Comparative Clinical Review

Susan L. Koletar, MD

What next? Francois Venter. ART new drugs, new studies. Wits Reproductive Health & HIV Institute

Pharmacological considerations on the use of ARVs in pregnancy

Simplifying Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens: It s not so simple

Clinical support for reduced drug regimens. David A Cooper The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia

The next generation of ART regimens

Antiretroviral Dosing in Renal Impairment

Antiretroviral Treatment Strategies: Clinical Case Presentation

Actualización y Futuro en VIH

Antiretroviral Therapy in Joel Gallant, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

HIV Treatment Update 8/3/2015. When to Start. Disclosures

Third Agent Advantages Disadvantages. Component Tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) 300/200 mg (coformulated with EFV as Atripla) 1 tab once daily

Advances in HIV Treatment: When to Start Treatment Which Antivirals to Use

Virological suppression and PIs. Diego Ripamonti Malattie Infettive - Bergamo

A Changing Landscape: New and Pipeline HIV Therapies

ACTHIV 2018: A State-of-the-Science Conference for Frontline Health Professionals

TUESDAY AM HIV DISCUSSION SERIES. 8/25/2015 Management of Treatment-Naïve Patients Ellen Kitchell, M.D.

ART and Prevention: What do we know?

Switching antiretroviral therapy to safer strategies based on integrase inhibitors. Pedro Cahn

VIKING STUDIES Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects

Drug toxicities: Safest PIs. Michelle Moorhouse 14 Apr 2016

HIV in in Women Women

Optimizing Clinical Utility of Integrase Inhibitors. Anton Pozniak MD FRCP

HIV Pharmacology 101ish - 202ish: New HIV Clinicians Workshop

HIV Treatment Evolution. Kimberly Y. Smith MD MPH Vice President and Head, Global Research and Medical Strategy Viiv Healthcare

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors on the Horizon

Dr Chloe Orkin. Barts Health NHS Trust, London. BHIVA AUTUMN CONFERENCE 2014 Including CHIVA Parallel Sessions

Tim Horn Deputy Executive Director, HIV & HCV Programs Treatment Action Group NASTAD Prevention and Care Technical Assistance Meeting Washington, DC

Understanding the unmet medical needs with current ART

Disclosures. Goals. US DHHS Guidelines: 1 st Line Therapy. Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation:

COMPREHENSIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL TABLE: ADULT DOSING, DOSAGE FORM MODIFICATIONS, ADVERSE REACTIONS and INTERACTION POTENTIAL

Didactic Series. CROI New Antiretroviral Therapies. Daniel Lee, MD Clinical Professor of Medicine UCSD Medical Center Owen Clinic July 14, 2016

Crafting an ART Regimen for Initiation or Salvage: Are NRTI s Necessary?

Josep Mallolas Hospital Clínic Barcelona

Management of ART Failure. EACS Advanced HIV Course 2015 Dr Nicky Mackie

Criteria for Oral PrEP

2/16/2017. Management and Prevention of HIV Infection: Case Discussion. Case 1. Case 1

The ART of Managing Drug-Drug Interactions in Patients with HIV

Continuing Education for Pharmacy Technicians

HIV 101. Applications of Antiretroviral Therapy

Selecting an Initial Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Regimen

Abstract PS8/2. Double-blind treatment phase D/C/F/TAF. + matching D/C + F/TDF placebo D/C/F/TAF. D/C + F/TDF + matching D/C/F/TAF placebo

Resistance Analyses of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors within Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Treatment-Naive Patients

Simplifying HIV Treatment Now and in the Future

Antiretroviral Treatment: What's in the Pipeline

2/10/2015. Switching from old regimens. HIV treatment revision: As simple as old versus new? What is an old regimen? What is an old regimen?

Didactic Series. Switching Regimens in the Setting of Virologic Suppression

Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine as Long-Acting Maintenance Therapy: LATTE-2 Week 32 Results

Current HIV Treatment A different challenge every time. Sonali Sonecha Lead HIV Pharmacist 22 nd September 2016

BHIVA Best of CROI Feedback Meetings. London Birmingham North West England Cardiff Gateshead Edinburgh

Dolutegravir: Pros and Cons (Are There Any Cons?)

HIV: Approach to the Treatment-Naïve Patient

Development of a protease inhibitor-based single-tablet complete HIV-1 regimen of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir

What is the virological support for reduced drug regimens?

Transcription:

L infettivologia del 3 millennio: AIDS ed altro VI Convegno Nazionale 15-16 -17 maggio 2014 Centro Congressi Hotel Ariston Paestum (SA)

Nuove molecole ad azione anti-hiv Annalisa Saracino Clinica Malattie Infettive Università di Bari Paestum (Sa) 15-16 -17 maggio 2014

Proportion of patients with a HIV-RNA 80 cp/ml at 12 months from starting their first ART regimen 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

NRTIs NNRTIs Abacavir Efavirenz Didanosine Nevirapine Emtricitabine Etravirine Lamivudine Rilpivirine Stavudine Tenofovir Zidovudine Fixed-dose Combinations AZT/3TC TDF/FTC/EFV ABC/3TC TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC TDF/FTC/ELV/COB AZT/3TC/ABC Protease Inhibitors Atazanavir Darunavir Fos-Amprenavir Indinavir Lopinavir Nelfinavir Ritonavir Saquinavir Tipranavir New Classes Fusion Inhibitors Enfuvirtide R5 Inhibitors Maraviroc Integrase Inhibitors Raltegravir Elvitegravir Dolutegravir (2014) www.emea.europa.eu

Co-formulated regimens including approved agents: Current EFV/FTC/TDF ATRIPLA RPV/FTC/TDF -EVIPLERA EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF - STRIBILD Future ABC/3TC/DLV Coformulated regimens using investigational agents: EVG/COBI/TAF/FTC DRV/COBI/TAF/FTC PIs coformulated with cobicistat as the pharmacologic booster: ATV/COBI DRV/COBI

Novel integrase inhibitors

Proportion of ART classes in first line regimens according to calendar period of starting PI NNRTI Other RAL 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 88,5% 11,4% 53,0% 52,3% 46,7% 47,3% 62,3% 0,1% 0,3% 0,3% 0,7% 1997-1999 n=2653 2000-2002 n=1028 2003-2005 n=721 36,5% 37,3% 2006-2008 n=707 55,3% 55,6% 4,1% 2009-2010 n=972 34,8% 8,2% 2011-2013 n=2321

Increasing evidence for integrase inhibitors in ART-naive patients RPV Echo/Thrive 1 RPV=EFV EFV 102 2 EVG/C=EFV Startmrk 3 RAL>EFV Single 4 DTG>EFV EVG/c ACTG5202 5 ATV/r=EFV RAL Spring-2 6 DTG=RAL DTG 103 7 EVG/C=ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 RAL>ATV/r RAL>DRV/r Flamingo 8 DTG>DRV/r ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 DRV/r>ATV/r DRV/r 1. Cohen CJ et al. JAIDS 2012; 60 (1): 33-42 ; 2. Sax PE et al. Lancet 2012; 379: 2439 48; Rockstroh JK et al. JAIDS 2013; 63 (1); 4. Walmsley SL et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1807-1818; 5. Daar ES, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:445 56; 6. Raffi F et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):735-43; 7. DeJesus E, et al. Lancet 2012;379:2429 38; 8. Feinberg J et al. 52 ICAAC, September 9-12, 2012, H-1464a; 9. Landovitz RJ et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 85.

Increasing evidence for integrase inhibitors in ART-naive patients RPV Echo/Thrive 1 RPV=EFV EFV 102 2 EVG/C=EFV Startmrk 3 RAL>EFV Single 4 DTG>EFV EVG/c ACTG5202 5 ATV/r=EFV RAL Spring-2 6 DTG=RAL DTG 103 7 EVG/C=ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 RAL>ATV/r RAL>DRV/r Flamingo 8 DTG>DRV/r ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 DRV/r>ATV/r DRV/r 1. Cohen CJ et al. JAIDS 2012; 60 (1): 33-42 ; 2. Sax PE et al. Lancet 2012; 379: 2439 48; Rockstroh JK et al. JAIDS 2013; 63 (1); 4. Walmsley SL et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1807-1818; 5. Daar ES, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:445 56; 6. Raffi F et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):735-43; 7. DeJesus E, et al. Lancet 2012;379:2429 38; 8. Feinberg J et al. 52 ICAAC, September 9-12, 2012, H-1464a; 9. Landovitz RJ et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 85.

LIPIDS: All arms PI-containing associated with regimens significant associated loss of BMD with significantly through Wk 96 greater increases in TC, LDL-C, TGs vs RAL at Wk 96 [2] Significantly greater loss in the combined PI arms than in the RAL arm Lipids remained stable or decreased in RAL arm Lipids changes in boosted PI arms similar

Increasing evidence for integrase inhibitors in ART-naive patients RPV Echo/Thrive 1 RPV=EFV EFV 102 2 EVG/C=EFV Startmrk 3 RAL>EFV Single 4 DTG>EFV EVG/c ACTG5202 5 ATV/r=EFV RAL Spring-2 6 DTG=RAL DTG 103 7 EVG/C=ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 RAL>ATV/r RAL>DRV/r Flamingo 8 DTG>DRV/r ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 DRV/r>ATV/r DRV/r 1. Cohen CJ et al. JAIDS 2012; 60 (1): 33-42 ; 2. Sax PE et al. Lancet 2012; 379: 2439 48; Rockstroh JK et al. JAIDS 2013; 63 (1); 4. Walmsley SL et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1807-1818; 5. Daar ES, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:445 56; 6. Raffi F et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):735-43; 7. DeJesus E, et al. Lancet 2012;379:2429 38; 8. Feinberg J et al. 52 ICAAC, September 9-12, 2012, H-1464a; 9. Landovitz RJ et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 85.

Increasing evidence for integrase inhibitors in ART-naive patients RPV Echo/Thrive 1 RPV=EFV EFV 102 2 EVG/C=EFV Startmrk 3 RAL>EFV Single 4 DTG>EFV EVG/c ACTG5202 5 ATV/r=EFV RAL Spring-2 6 DTG=RAL DTG 103 7 EVG/C=ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 RAL>ATV/r RAL>DRV/r Flamingo 8 DTG>DRV/r ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 DRV/r>ATV/r DRV/r 1. Cohen CJ et al. JAIDS 2012; 60 (1): 33-42 ; 2. Sax PE et al. Lancet 2012; 379: 2439 48; Rockstroh JK et al. JAIDS 2013; 63 (1); 4. Walmsley SL et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1807-1818; 5. Daar ES, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:445 56; 6. Raffi F et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):735-43; 7. DeJesus E, et al. Lancet 2012;379:2429 38; 8. Feinberg J et al. 52 ICAAC, September 9-12, 2012, H-1464a; 9. Landovitz RJ et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 85.

95% CI for Difference 95% CI for Difference Favors EFV Favors EVG/COBI Favors ATV/RTV Favors EVG/COBI Wk 48 [1] Wk 96 [2] Wk 144 [3] 3.6% -1.6% 2.7% -2.9% 4.9% 8.8% -1.3% 11.1% -12% 12% 0 Wk 48 [1] Wk 96 [2] -4.5% Wk 144 [3] 2.7% -2.1% 1.1% 3.1% 7.5% 6.7% -3.2% 9.4% -12% 12% 0 1. Sax PE, et al. Lancet. 2012;379:2439-2448. 2. Zolopa A, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:96-100. 3. Wohl D, et al. ICAAC 2013. Abstract H-672a.

EVG/COBI vs EFV Through Wk 144 [1-3] EVG/COBI vs ATV/RTV through Wk 144 [4-6] EVG/COBI (n = 348) EFV (n = 352) Wk 48 96 144 48 96 144 Resistance at VF, n INSTI mutations, n NNRTI mutations, n NRTI mutations, n 8 +2 +0 8 +2 +4 7 +2 +0 8 +2 +4 8 +2 +0 2 +1 +1 EVG/COBI (n = 353) ATV/RTV (n = 355) Wk 48 96 144 48 96 144 Resistance at VF, n INSTI mutations, n PI mutations, n NRTI mutations, n 5 +1 +2 0 0 +2 4 0 +1 0 0 3 +1 +2 0 0 +2 1. Sax PE, et al. Lancet. 2012;379:2439-2448. 2. Zolopa A, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:96-100. 3. Wohl D, et al. ICAAC 2013. Abstract H-672a. 4. DeJesus E, et al. Lancet. 2012;379:2429-2438. 5. Rockstroh J, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62:483-486. 6. Clumeck N, et al. EACS 2013. Abstract LBPS7/2.

Patients (%) Δ +5.3% (95% CI: -0.5 to +12) 100 93 88 n = 80 60 40 20 0 1 EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC (n = 290) Stable NNRTIs (n = 143) 271 126 3 1 16 16 Virologic Success* < 1 Virologic Nonresponse 6 11 No Data *HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/ml as defined by FDA Snapshot algorithm Discontinued for AE, death, or missing data. Pozniak A, et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 553LB. Reproduced with permission. Regimens: EFV, 78%; NVP, 17%; RPV, 4%; ETR, < 1%; 74% on EFV/TDF/FTC; 91% on first regimen Results similar across all baseline virologic and demographic subgroups 3 pts with VF in EVG/COBI arm and 1 in NNRTI arm No pts with resistance in either arm 5 in the switch arm and 1 in the NNRTI arm discontinued due to adverse event

Patients, % n = 100 80 60 40 20 0 Δ +6.7% (95% CI: 0.4-13.7) 94 87 < 1 EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC (n = 290) Stable boosted PIs (n = 139) 272 121 2 2 16 16 Virologic Success* 1 Virologic Nonresponse 6 12 No Data *HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/ml as defined by FDA Snapshot algorithm Discontinued for AE, death, or missing data. Arribas J, et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 551LB. Regimens: ATV, 40%; DRV, 40%; LPV, 17%; FPV, 3%; SQV, < 1%; 79% on first regimen Results similar across all baseline virologic and demographic subgroups 2 pts with VF in each arm but no pts with resistance in either arm 5 in the switch arm and 2 in the boosted PI arm discontinued due to adverse event Lipids in switch pts TGs vs all bpis TC, TG, HDL-C vs LPV/RTV HDL-C vs DRV/RTV

Increasing evidence for integrase inhibitors in ART-naive patients RPV Echo/Thrive 1 RPV=EFV EFV 102 2 EVG/C=EFV Startmrk 3 RAL>EFV Single 4 DTG>EFV EVG/c ACTG5202 5 ATV/r=EFV RAL Spring-2 6 DTG=RAL DTG 103 7 EVG/C=ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 RAL>ATV/r RAL>DRV/r Flamingo 8 DTG>DRV/r ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 DRV/r>ATV/r DRV/r 1. Cohen CJ et al. JAIDS 2012; 60 (1): 33-42 ; 2. Sax PE et al. Lancet 2012; 379: 2439 48; Rockstroh JK et al. JAIDS 2013; 63 (1); 4. Walmsley SL et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1807-1818; 5. Daar ES, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:445 56; 6. Raffi F et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):735-43; 7. DeJesus E, et al. Lancet 2012;379:2429 38; 8. Feinberg J et al. 52 ICAAC, September 9-12, 2012, H-1464a; 9. Landovitz RJ et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 85.

Increasing evidence for integrase inhibitors in ART-naive patients RPV Echo/Thrive 1 RPV=EFV EFV 102 2 EVG/C=EFV Startmrk 3 RAL>EFV Single 4 DTG>EFV EVG/c ACTG5202 5 ATV/r=EFV RAL Spring-2 6 DTG=RAL DTG 103 7 EVG/C=ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 RAL>ATV/r RAL>DRV/r Flamingo 8 DTG>DRV/r ATV/r ACTG 5257 9 DRV/r>ATV/r DRV/r 1. Cohen CJ et al. JAIDS 2012; 60 (1): 33-42 ; 2. Sax PE et al. Lancet 2012; 379: 2439 48; Rockstroh JK et al. JAIDS 2013; 63 (1); 4. Walmsley SL et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1807-1818; 5. Daar ES, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:445 56; 6. Raffi F et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):735-43; 7. DeJesus E, et al. Lancet 2012;379:2429 38; 8. Feinberg J et al. 52 ICAAC, September 9-12, 2012, H-1464a; 9. Landovitz RJ et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 85.

DTG: 80% Week 96 adjusted difference in response (95% CI): +8.0% (+2.3% to +13.8%); P=0.006 EFV: 72% CD4 from BL Treatment Wk96 from BL Adjusted mean DTG + ABC/3TC QD (n=414) 325.3 10.5 EFV/TDF/FTC QD (n=419) 281.4 10.9 SE Difference in response (95% CI) 44.0 (14.3, 73.6) P=0.004 0 4 8 12 16 24 32 40 48 60 72 84 96 Overall, the statistically higher responses on DTG + ABC/3TC vs EFV/TDF/FTC were driven by withdrawals due to AEs (3% vs 11%, respectively), irrespective of viral load strata. Differences in time to viral suppression favored DTG + ABC/3TC (28 vs 84 days, P<0.0001). Walmsley et al. CROI 2014; Boston, MA. Poster 337.

DTG + ABC/3TC QD EFV/TDF/FTC QD Mutation (n=414) (n=419) NRTI TE major mutations 0 1 (K65R) NNRTI TE major mutations 0 6 (K101E, K103N, G190A)* INI-r TE major substitution 0** 0 TE = treatment emergent *n=1 with K101E, n=1 with K103N, n=2 with K103K/N, n=1 with G190A and n=1 with K103N + G190A **E157Q/P polymorphism detected with no significant change in IN phenotypic susceptibility Parameter Body system (at least 2% in either arm) DTG + ABC/3TC QD (n=414) EFV/TDF/FTC QD (n=419) Psychiatric disorders 4 (<1%) 23 (5%) Nervous system disorders 1 (<1%) 17 (4%) Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders 2 (<1%) 9 (2%) General disorders and administration site conditions 0 10 (2%) Gastrointestinal disorders 0 8 (2%)

DTG + ABC/3TC QD EFV/TDF/FTC QD Parameter Week 48 Week 96 Week 48 Week 96 Urine albumin/ creatinine ratio (mg/mmol) Median change (IQR) Serum creatinine (mg/dl) Median change (IQR) 0 (-0.3, 0.3) 0.11 (0.05, 0.18) 0 (-0.3, 0.2) 0.14 (0.07, 0.20) 0.05 (-0.2, 0.3) -0.01 (-0.06, 0.04) Small, non-progressive changes in serum creatinine were observed in the DTG + ABC/3TC arm, due to known inhibition of tubular creatinine secretion by DTG. 1 Grade 2 or higher ALT elevations were observed more commonly in the EFV/TDF/FTC arm (24/419; 6%) than in the DTG + ABC/3TC arm (12/414; 3%). 0.05 (-0.2, 0.3) 0.02 (-0.04, 0.07) 1. Koteff J, Borland J, Chen S, et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:990-996. Walmsley et al. CROI 2014; Boston, MA. Poster 337.

Patients (%) n = Δ +7.1% (95% CI: +0.9% to +13.2%; P =.025) 100 80 60 40 20 0 90 83 217 200 Virologic Success* DTG + NRTIs DRV/RTV + NRTIs 6 7 4 15 18 10 Virologic Nonresponse 10 24 No Data Treatment-related study d/c: 1% in DTG arm vs 4% in DRV/RTV arm More diarrhea with DRV; more headache with DTG 2 pts (< 1%) in each arm met criteria for VF No pts with resistance in either arm Similar increase in CD4+ cell count at Wk 48: +210 cells/mm 3 in each arm *HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/ml as defined by FDA Snapshot algorithm Discontinued for AE, death, or missing data. Feinberg J, et al. ICAAC 2013. Abstract H-1464a.

Novel boosting agents: cobicistat

Small molecule with no HIV activity (no concern of drug resistance in pts with suboptimal virologic response) Similar from BL in fasting TC and TGs compared with RTV when boosting same agent [1] Inhibitor of CYP3A4; many drug drug interactions [2,3] Modest, rapid increase in serum Cr due to inhibition of tubular secretion [3] Not associated with any change in actual GFR Other drugs (including ARVs) have similar effect [4,5] Availability of cobicistat has allowed for development of new coformulated agents and regimens 1. Gallant JE, et al. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:32-39. 2. DHHS Guidelines February 2013. 3. TDF/FTC/EVG/COBI [package insert]. 4. RPV [package insert]. 5. DTG [package insert].

Change From BL in Serum Cr (mg/dl; IQR) At BL,* Estimated CrCl Urine glucose Urine protein Serum Cr* Serum Cr* UA Serum Cr* Serum Cr* UA 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0-0.05-0.10 Wk 4 new baseline against which further changes should be measured BL 2 4 8 12 16 24 32 40 48 Wks *Serum phosphorus should be measured in patients at risk for renal impairment Coformulated drugs containing COBI should not be initiated in pts with estimated CrCl < 70 ml/min (Studies ongoing in pts with CrCl < 70 Interpretation of changes in renal function may be problematic when using coformulations of COBI and TDF TDF/FTC/EVG/COBI should not be used with other nephrotoxic drugs 12. TDF/FTC/EVG/COBI [package insert]. 13. DHHS Guidelines February 2013.

From TDF to TAF

TAF (GS-7340), investigational prodrug of tenofovir with lower plasma concentrations, increased delivery to hepatocytes, lymphoid cells Randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial in ART-naive patients Gut TFV TDF TAF Plasma TDF/TFV TAF Lymphoid Cells TAF Cathepsin A TFV TFV-MP TFV-DP HIV-infected, ART-naive patients, with CD4+ cell count > 50 cells/mm 3 and egfr 70 ml/min (N = 170) Wk 24 TAF/FTC/EVG/ COBI (n = 112) TDF/FTC/EVG/ COBI (n = 58) Wk 48 38. Zolopa A, et al. CROI 2013. Abstract 99LB. 39. Sax P, et al. ICAAC 2013. Abstract H-1464d.

Median (Q1, Q3) Change in BMD Patients (%) Median (Q1, Q0) Change in BMD Δ 1.0% (95% CI: -12.1 to +10.0; P =.84) 100 80 88.4 87.9 TAF/FTC/EVG/COBI TDF/FTC/EVG/COBI 2-2 -4 Spine TAF/FTC/EVG/COBI (n = 112) TDF/FTC/EVG/COBI (n = 58) P <.001 60 40-6 2 0 12 24 36 48 Wks n = 20 0 99 51 Virologic Success* 6.3 10.3 7 6 Virologic Nonresponse 5.4 1.7 6 1 No Data *HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/ml as defined by FDA Snapshot algorithm. 40. Sax P, et al. ICAAC 2013. Abstract H-1464d. -2-4 -6 0 P <.001 Hip 12 24 36 48 Wks

Ongoing, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial Primary endpoint: HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml at Wk 24 Wk 24 Wk 48 ART-naive patients, HIV-1 RNA 5000 c/ml; CD4+ cell count > 50 cells/mm 3 ; egfr 70 ml/min (N = 150) TAF/FTC/DRV/COBI (n = 100) TDF/FTC + DRV/COBI (n = 50) 41. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01565850.

Novel NNRTIs

CROI 2014, abst 92LB

New STRATEGIES

David A. Margolis 1, Cynthia C. Brinson 2, Joseph J. Eron 3, Gary J. Richmond 4, Roger P LeBlanc 5, Sandy K. Griffith 1, Marty H. St. Clair 1, Marita C. Stevens 6, Peter E. Williams 6, William R. Spreen 1 1 GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC; 2 Central Texas Research Institute, Austin, TX; 3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; 4 Ft Lauderdale, FL; 5 Clinique OPUS Medical Director Montreal Qc Canada; 6 Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections March 3-6, 2014; Boston, MA

Phase IIb, randomized, multicenter, partially blind, dose-ranging study 744 + NRTI subjects with a W20 HIV-1 RNA <50 c/ml simplified to 744 + RPV at W24 Oral Induction Phase Oral Maintenance Phase HIV ART-naive HIV-1 RNA 1000 c/ml CD4 200 cells/mm 3 1:1:1:1 Randomization Stratified by VL and NRTI 744 10 mg + 2 NRTIs* 744 30 mg + 2 NRTIs 744 60 mg + 2 NRTIs 744 10 mg + RPV 25 mg 744 30 mg + RPV 25 mg 744 60 mg + RPV 25 mg EFV 600 mg + 2 NRTIs D1 Week *ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC 16 20 24 48 72 96 Primary endpoint: % HIV-1 RNA <50 c/ml at 48 weeks (FDA Snapshot ) Intent-to-treat exposed (ITT-E) received at least one dose of Investigational Product (IP) Intent-to-treat maintenance exposed (ITT-ME) received at least one maintenance dose

HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/ml by Snapshot Algorithm (%) 100 80 Induction Phase Maintenance Phase 96% 94% 92% 91% 60 40 20 GSK1265744 10 mg (n = 60) GSK1265744 30 mg (n = 60) GSK1265744 60 mg (n = 61) EFV 600 mg (n = 62) 0 BL 2 4 8 12 16 24 26 28 32 36 40 48 Wks 2 pts with PDVF during maintenance; both with INSTI mutations at BL Margolis D, et al. EACS 2013. Abstract PS7/1. Margolis D, et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 91LB

Following induction therapy, oral 744+RPV maintained virologic suppression at a rate similar to EFV+NRTIs Primary Endpoint: 82% of 744+RPV and 71% of EFV+NRTIs subjects had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml Secondary Endpoint (ITT-ME): 93% of 744+RPV and 94% of EFV+NRTIs subjects had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml Similar response rate across 744 10mg, 30mg, and 60mg arms One subject, with persistently low 744 and RPV drug concentrations, developed treatment emergent INI and NNRTI mutations 744+RPV was well tolerated, with few drug related AEs leading to withdrawal Long-term data needed, however, these regimen POC results support evaluation of long-acting injectable regimen of 744 LA + TMC278 LA as maintenance therapy

Nanoparticles optimisation of long-active release better penetration into reservoirs

CROI 2014, abst 518

DAPIVIRINE (NNRTI): vaginal rings, gel and films Conclusions: -Vaginal rings were safe and well tolerated. -DPV but not MVC delivered by a vaginal ring for 28 days blocked HIV-1 infection in cervical tissue. -There was a linear correlation between DPV levels in tissue and protective effect. CROI 2014, abst 41 CROI 2014, abst 42

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-finding phase IIb trial Stratified by BL HIV-1 RNA < 100,000 or 100,000 copies/ml Wk 24 primary analysis Wk 48 final analysis ART-naive pts with CCR5-tropic HIV-1, no NRTI or NNRTI resistance (N = 143) CVC 100 mg + TDF/FTC (n = 59) CVC 200 mg + TDF/FTC (n = 56) EFV 600 mg + TDF/FTC (n = 28) Complex dosing: 4 pills with breakfast (4 CVC or 4 CVC placebo or 2 of each); 1 pill on empty stomach at bedtime (EFV or EFV placebo); 1 pill taken anytime (open-label TDF/FTC) Gathe J, et al. CROI 2013. Abstract 106LB.

HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/ml (%) 100 80 60 ITT (FDA Snapshot Analysis) 76 73 71 Virologic NR, % DC Other Than AE, % DC Due to AE, % 40 20 0 n = n = n = BL 1 2 4 8 12 16 20 24 Wks 0 2 0 3 2 4 11 4 5 25 17 12 37 28 16 44 33 18 42 40 19 CVC 100 mg CVC 200 mg EFV 45 41 20 12 10 0 14 11 2 4 7 18 CVC generally well tolerated with no safety signals Soluble CD14 decreased with CVC and increased with EFV Gathe J, et al. CROI 2013. Abstract 106LB. Graphic used with permission.

CROI 2014, abst 532

Modeling HIV gene therapy in humanized mice and clinical application GRAZIE! Bennett and Akkina, Viruses, 2013