17th ESO-ESMO Masterclass Clinical Oncology
|
|
- Jonas Bradley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: Evidence Based Treatment Manuela Schmidinger Medical University of Vienna, Austria
2 Disclosures Honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from: Pfizer, Roche, BMS, Novartis, Ipsen, Astellas, AVEO, Exilixis, EISAI, Eusa Pharma
3 Topics First- and second-line treatment according to the current guidelines (ESMO 2016) First-and second-line treatment of mrcc in the near future (ESMO 2018 guidelines)
4 IMDC Risk Groups in mrcc 0 RF: favorable; 1-2 RF s: intermediate; 3+ RF s poor risk Heng DY et al., Lancet Oncol 2014
5 F I R S T L I N E S E C O N D L i n e 1 st -Line treatment NOW ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2016*; CC-Good/ intermediate risk Standard: Sunitinib [I, A] Bevacizumab + IFN [I, A] Pazopanib [I, A] Option: High-dose IL2 [III, C] Sorafenib [II, B] Bevacizumab + low-dose IFN [III, B] Post TKI s Nivolumab (IA) MCBS 5 Cabozantinib (IA) Option Axitinib (IIB) Everolimus (IIB) Sorafenib (IIIB) CC- Poor risk Standard: Temsirolimus [II, A] Non-cc Standard: Sunitinib [II, B] Favorable/intermediate Option: risk: use the agent your are Sunitinib [II, B] most Sorafenib familiar [III, B] with Poor risk: preference Pazopanib for VEGFR-TKI s [III, B] rather than temsirolimus Option: Temsirolimus [III, B] Sorafenib [III, B] Pazopanib [III, B] Everolimus [III, B] Escudier B, et al. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v58-v68.
6 F I R S T L I N E S E C O N D L i n e 2 nd -Line treatment NOW ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2016*; CC-Good/ intermediate risk Standard: Sunitinib [I, A] Bevacizumab + IFN [I, A] Pazopanib [I, A] Option: High-dose IL2 [III, C] Sorafenib [II, B] Bevacizumab + low-dose IFN [III, B] Post TKI s Nivolumab (IA) MCBS 5 Cabozantinib (IA) Option Axitinib (IIB) Everolimus (IIB) Sorafenib (IIIB) CC- Poor risk Standard: Temsirolimus [II, A] Option: Sunitinib [II, B] Sorafenib [III, B] Pazopanib [III, B] Non-cc Standard: Sunitinib [II, B] Option: Temsirolimus [III, B] Sorafenib [III, B] Pazopanib [III, B] Everolimus [III, B] Escudier B, et al. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v58-v68.
7 Treatment Options and Questions for 2 nd - Line Treatment Decisions 1. What is available and reimbursed in my country??? 2. Is all of this still appropriate in 2018??? Axitinib Sorafenib Cabozantinib Everolimus Nivolumab
8 What is appropriate for 2 nd -line 2018? Axitinib Sorafenib Choueriri T et al., New Engl J Med 2015 But... Motzer R et al., New Engl J Med 2015 Motzer RJ et al., Lancet Tamburini J et al., Blood Chiarini F et al., Cancer Res Kang SA et al., Science Gewirtz DA et al., Cancer Res 2014 Cabozantinib Everolimus Nivolumab Loser in three randomized trials CheckMate 025 METEOR HOPE Poor pro-apoptotic activity, being mainly cytostatic Do not target all mtorc1 outputs 1-4 S6K1-dependent feedback-loops that lead to reactivation of RTK, PI3K/Akt and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling 3
9 Progression-free Survival Randomized phase II trial: Lenvatinib+Everolimus vs Everolimus vs Lenvatinib 2 nd -Line Number at risk Objective Response Lenvatinib/Everolimus (n = 51) Lenvatinib (n = 52) Everolimus (n = 50) Objective response rate, % % CI Best overall response, % Complete Partial Stable disease Progression Not evaluated Median duration of objective response, (months) % CI 3.7 NE 3.8 NE NE, not estimable. Primary Endpoint: Progression-free Survival Lenvatinib/Everolimus vs Everolimus HR 0.40 (95% CI ); P < Lenvatinib vs Everolimus HR 0.61 (95% CI ); P = Median, mos (95% CI) Lenvatinib/Everolimus 14.6 ( ) Lenvatinib 7.4 ( ) Everolimus 5.5 ( ) Time (mos) Lenvatinib/Everolimus Lenvatinib Everolimus Motzer RJ, et al. Lancet Oncology 2015; 16:
10 Progression-free survival (probability) What is appropriate for 2 nd -line 2018? Axitinib Sorafenib Cabozantinib Nivolumab AXIS: Axitinib significantly prolonged PFS versus sorafenib Subjects at risk, n Axitinib Sorafenib Time (months) mpfs, months Axitinib 6.8 Sorafenib % CI P< (log-rank) Stratified HR (95% CI : ) Rini B, et al. ASCO 2011
11 Decision in second-line IO or TKI? Tyrosine kinase inhibition Restoring T-cell function by blocking PD-1-PD-L1 interaction Axitinib Cabozantinib 1 Nivolumab 2 Not investigated versus nivolumab or cabozantinib PFS in favorable risk population: 13.9 (95%CI ) vs 4.7 ( ) months 3 1.Choueiri T et l, New Engl J Med Motzer R et al., New Engl J Med Bracarda S et al., ASCO GU 2018, abstract 589 Significant benefits in ORR Just PFS another OS TKI? 60% dose reductions Significant benefits in ORR OS QoL
12 1) 2 nd -Line CABOZANTINIB How strong is the rationale for using a MET-AXL-VEGF-inhibitor in second line? Tumours first respond to VEGF(R)-inhibitors: stasis/ regression, loss of vasculature Induction of a hypoxic microenvironment 1 (occurrence of resistance, epithelial to mesenchymal transition) Various VEGF-independent mechanisms enable revascularisation and progression > Switching to an agent that does not primarily target VEGF VEGF=vascular endothelial growth factor Paez-Ribes M, et al. Cancer Cell 2009;15(3);
13 Cabozantinib: VEGF-MET-AXL inhibition Is additional HGF VEGF-inhibition provided by Gas6 Cabozantinib Cabozantinib MET necessary? Tumour cell VHL inactivation AXL Increased MET and AXL expression has been associated with poor prognosis and resistance to VEGFR inhibitors in VEGF Tumour progression 1,2 Growth, invasion, metastasis Resistance to VEGFR inhibition Tumour angiogenesis Cabozantinib is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, VEGF receptors and AXL 3,4 RCC 1,2 GAS6=growth arrest-specific 6; HGF=hepatocyte growth factor; RCC=renal cell carcinoma; VEGF=vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR=vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; VHL=von Hippel Lindau 1. Zhou L, et al. Oncogene 2016;35(21): ; 2. Ciamporcero E, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(1): ; 3. Yakes FM, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(12): ; 4. Choueiri TK, et al. New Engl J Med 2015;373(19):
14 Targeting MET-AXL and VEGF simultaneously is a strategy that addresses both: the mechanisms of (primary or secondary) resistance to VEGF-inhibition such as MET- AXL upregulation the potentially regained sensitivity of the tumor to VEGF, because resistance is of temporary nature 1.Hammers HJ, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2010;9(6): Zhou L, et al. Oncogene 2016;35(21): ; 3. Ciamporcero E, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(1): ; 4. Yakes FM, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(12): ;
15 METEOR: Cabozantinib versus Everolimus 1 Overall Survival Hazard ratio 0.66 (95% CI ), P= ASCO 2016 Median OS mo (95% CI) No. at Risk Cabozantinib Everolimus No. of Deaths Cabozantinib (N=330) 21.4 (18.7-NE) 140 Everolimus (N=328) 16.5 ( ) 180 Cut-off: Dec 31, Choueiri T et al., New Engl J Med 2015
16 Mean change from baseline Worse Better 2) 2 nd -Line NIVOLUMAB CheckMate 025: Nivolumab versus Everolimus 1 CheckMate 025: HRQoL Mean change from baseline in HRQoL scores by FKSI-DRS: descriptive analysis Nivolumab Everolimus Number of patients at risk c b Treatment visit (week) Everolimus Adapted from Cella et al, a Significant improvement (P<0.05) from baseline in FKSI-DRS for nivolumab. b Significant improvement (P<0.05) in FKSI-DRS mean change from baseline scores between nivolumab and everolimus arms. c Significant deterioration (P<0.05) from baseline in FKSI-DRS for everolimus. Note:o ytimepoi ts heredata ereavai ab efor 5 patie ts arep oted. FKSI-DRS, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms. Cella DF et al. Oral presentation at ASCO a c 139 Nivolumab Motzer RJ et al., New Engl J Med 2015
17 Can differences between studies help to make a treatment choice? CheckMate 025 and METEOR Comparator Population ORR and OS Disease specific details Similarities Both everolimus 71% and 72% were second line Both provide encouraging, clinically relevant and statistically significant ORR and OS outcomes Both studied in patients with bone metastases; both not studied in patients with brain metastases, non-cchistologies 1. Choueiri TK, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373: ; 2. Choueiri TK, et al. Lancet Oncol 2016;17: ; 3. Motzer RJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373: PFS Dose reduction Safety (all causality) MoA Differences Nivolumab does not significantly improve PFS, while cabozantinib provides a statistically significant superiority 60% of cabozantinib patients required dose reductions while no dose reductions were allowed in CheckMate025 However: 51% had dose delays/interruptions Cabozantinib: grades 3-4: 71% Nivolumab: grades 3-4: 53% Different targets ESMO 2017 ASK Meeting Internal Ipsen Do not distribute
18 Do we know yet when which mode of action is appropriate? Currently, the decision between TKI and Checkpoint inhibitor is subject to two phenomena Success even in melanoma TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor 1 2
19 Do we know yet when which mode of action is appropriate? 1) That immunotherapy should be given as early as possible Checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients Results from the IMDC) 2 2) That response to first-line TKI may help to select treatment in second line Perception 1. Yip S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:(suppl. abstract 4580).
20 Patient GF: Treatment with cabozantinib after early progression on sunitinib Male patient, 66 years old, ECOG 0 March 2014: Nephrectomy ccrcc, pt3a, M1, G3 Synchronous skeletal metastasis, laminectomy Th3/Th4 April 2014: lung metastases, IMDC intermediate risk May 2014: Began first-line sunitinib, PFS 5 months October 2014: Began second-line cabozantinib, PFS 19 months Response to first-line TKI is a poor driver of treatment decision in second line
21 Can differences between studies help to make a treatment choice? CheckMate 025 and METEOR Comparator Population ORR and OS Disease specific details Similarities Both everolimus 71% and 72% were second line Both provide encouraging, clinically relevant and statistically significant ORR and OS outcomes Both studied in patients with bone metastases; both not studied in patients with brain metastases, non-cchistologies 1. Choueiri TK, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373: ; 2. Choueiri TK, et al. Lancet Oncol 2016;17: ; 3. Motzer RJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373: PFS Dose reduction Safety (all causality) MoA Differences Nivolumab does not significantly improve PFS, while cabozantinib provides a statistically significant superiority 60% of cabozantinib patients required dose reductions while no dose reductions were allowed in CheckMate025 However: 51% had dose delays/interruptions Cabozantinib: grades 3-4: 71% Nivolumab: grades 3-4: 53% Different targets ESMO 2017 ASK Meeting Internal Ipsen Do not distribute
22 Arguments against immunotherapy (few) When is IO less appropriate than a TKI? STRONG STRONG RATHER WEAK SHOULD BE FURTHER EXPLORED Significant difference between hyperprogressive disease and age: (66 vs 55; P=0.007) * 19% of patients older than 64 years vs 5% of patients younger than 64 * *Champiat S, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2016;23: WEAK
23 Arguments pro Immunotherapy When is IO more appropriate than a TKI?
24 Female patient: 63 years at diagnosis of mrcc, intermediate risk July 2013 TN right kidney: cc- RCC, pt3a, G2-3; L0, V0, R0, pnx November 2015: Nivolumab (NPP) Toxicities: 0 Complains about weight gain due to increased appetite: 7kg TKIs for metastasis in lung, mediastinal lymph nodes PFS on TKI: 21 months VEGFR-TKI- toxicities: Asthenia 3 Diarrhoea 3 Nausea 3 Last staging: December 2017, stable disease PFS Nivolumab: 25 months Excellent QoL
25 THE DISCUSSION ALONG TREATMENT CHOICE IN 2 ND -LINE IS GOING TO BE REDUNDANT SOON... DUE TO DRAMATIC CHANGES IN 1 ST -LINE
26 Topics First- and second-line treatment according to the current guidelines (ESMO 2016) First-and second-line treatment of mrcc in the near future (ESMO 2018 guidelines)
27 What do we need to know about the role of VEGFR-inhibitors in 1 st -Line mrcc? VEGF(R) Inhibitors haven been the 1 st -Line Standard of Care for the last 12 years They were approved based on a statistically significant benefit in PFS and ORR not based on survival benefits OS results would have been confounded anyway, due to cross over or access to a VEGF-inhibitor after progression Before 2017, Sunitinib has never been defeated by any other agent in a randomized phase III superiority trial
28 LBA5 CheckMate 214: Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Sunitinib for Treatment-Naïve Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, Including IMDC Risk and PD-L1 Expression Subgroups Bernard Escudier, 1 Nizar M. Tannir, 2 David F. McDermott, 3 Osvaldo Arén Frontera, 4 Bohuslav Melichar, 5 Elizabeth R. CheckMate Plimack, 6 Philippe Barthelemy, 214: 7 Saby George, Study 8 Victoria Neiman, design 9 Camillo Porta, 10 Toni K. Choueiri, 11 Thomas Powles, 12 Frede Donskov, 13 Pamela Salman, 14 Christian K. Kollmannsberger, 15 Brian Rini, 16 Sabeen Mekan, 17 M. Brent McHenry, 17 Hans J. Hammers, 18 Robert J. Motzer 19 74% and 71% PD-L1 negative 1 Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; 2 University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; 3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Patients Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; 4 Centro Treatment Internacional de Estudios Clinicos, Santiago, Chile; 5 Palacky University, and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; 6 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 7 Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; 8 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, Arm NY, A USA; 9 Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Treatment-naïve Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; 10 IRCCS 3 mg/kg San Matteo nivolumab University Hospital IV + Foundation, Pavia, Italy; 11 Danaadvanced Farber or Cancer Institute, Brigham Randomize Women s Hospital, 1:1 and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 12 Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary 1 University mg/kg of ipilimumab London, Royal Free IV Q3W NHS Trust, London, UK; 13 Aarhus metastatic clear-cell University Hospital, Aarhus, Stratified Denmark; 14 by Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, for four Chile; doses, 15 British then Columbia Cancer Agency, Treatment Vancouver, BC, until RCC Canada; 16 Cleveland Clinic IMDC Taussigprognostic Cancer Institute, score Cleveland, OH, 3 mg/kg USA; 17 Bristol-Myers nivolumab Squibb, IV Princeton, Q2W NJ, USA; 18 progression Sidney Kimmel or Measurable Comprehensive disease Cancer Center, (0 vs 1 2 Johns vs Hopkins, 3 6) Baltimore, MD, USA; 19 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA KPS 70% unacceptable Region (US vs Tumor tissue Canada/Europe vs toxicity available for PD-L1 Rest of World) Arm B testing 50 mg sunitinib orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycles) Co-Primary EP:ORR, PFS OS in intermediate and poor risk (n=847) IMDC, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q3W, every 3 weeks Secondary EP: ORR, PFS, OS in ITT (includes favorable risk, n=249)) Exploratory EP: ORR, PFS, OS in favorable and PD-L1 pos. patients Escudier B et al., ESMO 2017 Madrid
29 Overall Survival (Probability) Progression-Free Survival (Probability) Duration of Response (Probability) Results Primary endpoints Co-primary endpoint: ORR ORR and DOR: IMDC intermediate/poor risk Median duration of response, Patients with ongoing Co-primary endpoint months (95% CI) response, % NIVO + IPI NR (21.8 NE) 72 SUN 18.2 (14.8 NE) 63 PFS per IRRC: IMDC intermediate/poor risk 1.0 N = Median PFS, months (95% CI) NIVO + IPI SUN Outcome N = 425 N = NIVO + IPI 11.6 ( ) Confirmed ORR, a 1.0 % (95% CI) 42 Co-primary (37 47) 27 endpoint 0.7 SUN 8.4 ( ) (22 31) Hazard ratio (99.1% CI), 0.82 ( ) P < P = Confirmed BOR, a 0.7 % OS: IMDC intermediate/poor risk 0.6 Complete response 9 b 1 b Partial response Stable disease Median OS, months (95% CI) Progressive disease NIVO + IPI NR (28.2 NE) 0.2 Unable to determine/not reported SUN 26.0 (22.1 NE) No. at Risk Months airrc-assessed ORR and 0BOR by RECIST 3 v1.1; b P < NIVO + IPI No. at Risk 0.8 Months NIVO + IPI SUN P < SUN Escudier B et al., Presidential Session ESMO No. at Risk NIVO + IPI SUN Hazard ratio (99.8% CI), 0.63 ( ) Months Escudier B et al., ESMO 2017 Madrid
30 Progression-Free Survival (Probability) Results exploratory endpoints Exploratory endpoint No. at Risk PFS by PD-L1 expression: IMDC intermediate/poor risk PD-L1 <1% (n = 562) PD-L1 1% (n = 214) Median PFS, months (95% CI) 1.0 NIVO + IPI 11.0 ( ) SUN 10.4 ( ) 0.9 HR (95% CI) 1.00 ( ) 0.8 P = Exploratory 0.7 endpoint Months NIVO SUN Outcome Median PFS, months (95% CI) NIVO + IPI 22.8 (9.4 NE) SUN 5.9 ( ) HR (95% CI) 0.48 ( ) P = ORR and 0.3 PFS: IMDC favorable risk Months Exploratory endpoint Antitumor activity by tumor PD-L1 expression level Outcome NIVO + IPI N = 284 IMDC intermediate/poor risk Intention to treat PD-L1 <1% PD-L1 1% PD-L1 <1% PD-L1 1% SUN N = 278 NIVO + IPI N = 100 SUN N = 114 NIVO + IPI N = 386 SUN N = 376 NIVO + IPI N = 113 SUN N = 127 ORR, a % (95% CI) 37 (32 43) 28 (23 34) 58 (48 68) 22 (15 31) 36 (31 41) 35 (31 40) 53 (44 63) 22 (15 30) PFS, c median (95% CI), months P = ( ) P < P = (20.9 NE) P < BOR, a % Complete response 7 1 HR 16 (99.1% 1 CI) ( ) Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease P < NA a IRRC-assessed NIVO + IPI N = 125 Escudier B et al., ESMO 2017 Madrid N = 249 a SUN N = 124 Confirmed ORR, b % (95% CI) 29 (21 38) 52 (43 61) P =
31 F I R S T L I N E ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2018?*; Good risk Clear cell histology Standard: Sunitinib [I, A] Bevacizumab + IFN [I, A] Pazopanib [I, A] Tivozanib Option: High-dose IL2 [III, C] Sorafenib [II, B] Bevacizumab + low-dose IFN [III, B] Intermediate/Poor risk Standard: Nivolumab+Ipilimumab Cabozantinib Option: Temsirolimus [II, A] Sunitinib [II, B] Sorafenib [III, B] Pazopanib [III, B] Non clear cell histology Standard: Sunitinib [II, B] Option: Temsirolimus [III, B] Sorafenib [III, B] Pazopanib [III, B] Everolimus [III, B] ESCUDIER B ET AL.,
32 F I R S T L I N E ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2018?*; Good risk Clear cell histology Standard: Sunitinib [I, A] Bevacizumab + IFN [I, A] Pazopanib [I, A] Option: High-dose IL2 [III, C] Sorafenib [II, B] Bevacizumab + low-dose IFN [III, B] Heng DY et al., Lancet Oncol 2014 Intermediate/Poor risk Standard: Nivolumab+Ipilimumab Option: Temsirolimus [II, A] Sunitinib [II, B] Sorafenib [III, B] Pazopanib [III, B] Is the patient population clear cut?
33 F I R S T ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2018?*; Good Risk Clear cell histology Standard: Sunitinib [I, A] Bevacizumab + IFN [I, A] Pazopanib [I, A] L I Option: N High-dose IL2 [III, C] Median E PFS: Sorafenib [II, B] Bevacizumab + low-dose Cabo: 8.2 months IFN [III, B] 95%CI, 6.2 to 8.8 months) Sun: 5.6 months (95%CI, 3.4 to 8.1) Adjusted HR for progression: 0.66, 95%CI ; p= Choueiri TK et al., J Clin Oncol 2016; Intermediate/Poor risk Standard: Nivolumab+Ipilimumab Cabozantinib Option: Temsirolimus [II, A] Sunitinib [II, B] Sorafenib [III, B] Pazopanib [III, B] Nivo+Ipi is not the only option for intermediate and poor risk
34 F I R S T L I N E ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2018?*; CC-Good risk Standard: Sunitinib [I, A] Bevacizumab + IFN [I, A] Pazopanib [I, A] Option: High-dose IL2 [III, C] Sorafenib [II, B] Bevacizumab + low-dose IFN [III, B] Sunitinib better than Nivo+Ipi, but: Do these patients need immediate treatment at all? Phase II study on observation: median time on observation: 14.9 months (95% CI ) 1,2 Confirmed retrospectively in 2716 patients 2 Are established TKI s the best option? Tivozanib approved 2017: highly potential VEGFR-TKI, few toxicities Is Nivo+Ipi never an option in favorable risk? What about favorable risk+pd-l1 expression (11% in 214)? PD-L1 expression predicts poor outcome from TKI 3 : should we offer a TKI or Nivo+Ipi in these 11%? 1.Rini BI et al., Lancet Oncol 2016; 2.Woldu SL et al., ASCO GU 2018, abstract 586; 3. Choueiri TK et al., Clin Cancer Res 2015
35 The near future is not only about Nivo+Ipi versus TKI: multiple combination trials (CPI+anti-VEGF) under way Rationale: CPI s T-cell mediated cancer cell killing may be enhanced Rationale through important for properties Combining of anti-vegf(r)-agents Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab Promotion of T-cell priming and activation via dendritic cell maturation Priming and activation (APCs and T cells) 2. Cancer antigen presentation (dendritic cells/apcs) 1. Release of cancer cell antigens (cancer cell death) 4. Trafficking of T cells to tumors (CTLs) 7. Killing of cancer cells (immune and cancer cells) 5. Infiltration of T cells into tumors (CTLs, endothelial cells) 6. Recognition of cancer cells by T cells (CTLs, cancer cells) Normalization of the tumor vasculature for increased T-cell tumor infiltration 3-6 Establishing an immune-permissive tumor microenvironment by decreasing MDSC and Treg populations 6-10 Atezolizumab s T-cell mediated cancer cell killing may be enhanced through bevacizumab s reversal of VEGF-mediated immunosuppression 1. Gabrilovich DI, et al. Nat Med, Oyama T, et al. J Immunol, Goel S, et al. Physiol Rev, Motz GT, et al. Nat Med, Hodi FS, et al. Cancer Immunol Res, Wallin JJ, et al. Nat Commun, Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Nat Rev Immunol, Roland CL, et al. PLoS One, Facciabene A, et al. Nature, Voron T, et al. J Exp Med, Figure Presented by: Dr. Robert Motzer adapted from Chen DS, Mellman I. Immunity, Gabrilovich DI, et al. Nat Med, Oyama T, et al. J Immunol, Goel S, et al. Physiol Rev, Motz GT, et al. Nat Med, Hodi FS, et al. Cancer Immunol Res, Wallin JJ, et al. Nat Commun, Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Nat Rev Immunol, Roland CL, et al. PLoS One, Facciabene A, et al. Nature, Voron T, et al. J Exp Med, Figure adapted from Chen DS, Mellman I. Immunity,
36 Combinations: highly promising... Pembro+ axi Avelumab+ axi...but they will raise more questions than answers, biased by sponsor (huge investment, urgent need for both a positive study for approval Pembro+ Lenvatinib Atezo+ bev n CR% PR% ORR% ASCO GU 2018 Nivo+Tivo a favorable profile within the competitor combos (> multiple endpoints...) Will not answer the questions: does every patient need a combo, which combo? Should we treat based on IMDC risk group, PD-L1 status...? Atkins MB et al., ASCO GU 2018, abstract 579 Choueiri T et al., J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl abstract 4504); Motzer RJ et al., ASCO GU 2018, abstract TPS 706 Motzer RJ et al., ASCO GU 2018, abstract 578 Escudier B et al., ASCO GU 2018, abstract 618 None of the above combinations are approved in 1L mrcc
37 The future of prediction? Treatment decisions based on the individual immunophenotype Kim JM et al., Ann Oncol 2016
38 Future Second-Line Decisions are going to be challenging After 1 st -line Nivo-Ipi After 1 st -line Combo VEGF-i+ PD(L)1-CPI After 1 st -line TKI Which TKI Sunitinib? Tivozanib? Axitinib? Cabozantinib? Any? Nivo+Ipi? TKI with more than VEGFinhibitory activity? (Cabo, Lenvatinib+Eve)? Is Nivo Mono appropriate at all after CheckMate 214??? After Sun/Tivo>TKI with more than VEGFinhibitory activity? (Cabo, Lenva+Eve)?
39 Conclusions After the introduction of targeted therapy 12 years ago, we now witness another paradigm shift in the treatment of mrcc: introduction of immune check point inhibitors and combinations Results from combination trials using either another CPI or targeted therapy are highly encourging, particularly with respect to the CR rate It is currently unknown 1) which combination is best; 2) which population; 3) whether combination or sequencing of novel agents provides more benefit; 4) if the type of sequence matters The future: treatment decisions based on the individual immunophenotype, transcriptom-profiling?
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systemic Therapy Progress and Promise
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systemic Therapy Progress and Promise Michael B. Atkins, M.D. Deputy Director, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Ctr Georgetown University Medical Center Everolimus Rini, Campbell, Escudier.
More informationDevelopping the next generation of studies in RCC
Developping the next generation of studies in RCC Bernard Escudier Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France Disclosure Information Advisory/Consultancy Role Pfizer, Exelixis, Novartis, BMS, Bayer, Roche,
More informationNEXT GENERATION DRUGS IN KIDNEY CANCER. Dr Aine O Reilly Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
NEXT GENERATION DRUGS IN KIDNEY CANCER Dr Aine O Reilly Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden KIDNEY CANCER SUBTYPES Papillary Type 1 and 2 Medullary Collecting duct Chromophobe Translocation Clear cell
More informationCLINICAL CHALLENGES IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: THE RIGHT THERAPY FOR THE RIGHT PATIENT
Daniel Heng, MD, MPH, FRCPC @DrDanielHeng Chair GU Tumour Group, Tom Baker Cancer Centre Clinical Professor, University of Calgary CLINICAL CHALLENGES IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: THE RIGHT THERAPY
More informationCurrent experience in immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Current experience in immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma Axel Bex, MD, PhD The Netherlands Cancer Institute FOIU, Tel Aviv, 3 July 2018 Financial and Other Disclosures Off-label use of drugs,
More informationHave Results of Recent Randomized Trials Changed the Role of mtor Inhibitors?
Have Results of Recent Randomized Trials Changed the Role of mtor Inhibitors? Bernard Escudier Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France EIKCS Lyon April 2015 What is the current role of mtor inhibitors?
More informationInnovaciones en el tratamiento del ca ncer renal. Enrique Grande
Innovaciones en el tratamiento del ca ncer renal Enrique Grande The enriched inflammatory environment of RCC Chen Z, et al. Nat Rev Cancer 2014 Available agents are expanding across the three eras of arcc
More informationSequencing of therapies in mrcc. Ari Hakimi MD Assistant Professor Urology Service, Department of Surgery MSKCC
Sequencing of therapies in mrcc Ari Hakimi MD Assistant Professor Urology Service, Department of Surgery MSKCC Old Paradigm Sequencing approved agents VEGF TKI Sunitinib Pazopanib Axitinib TKI TKI MTORi
More informationIntegrating novel therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma
Integrating novel therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma Tian Zhang, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine GU Oncology Duke Cancer Institute March 11, 2017 Disclosures Research Funding Janssen Pfizer Consultant
More informationA Phase II Study of Atezolizumab With or Without Bevacizumab vs Sunitinib in Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients
A Phase II Study of With or Without Bevacizumab vs in Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients David McDermott, 1 Michael Atkins, 2 Robert Motzer, 3 Brian Rini, 4 Bernard Escudier, 5 Lawrence
More informationRenal Cell Carcinoma: Navigating a Maze of Choices
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Navigating a Maze of Choices Sumanta Kumar Pal, M.D. Associate Professor Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics Co-Director, Kidney Cancer Program City of Hope
More informationInmunoterapia en cáncer renal metastásico: redefiniendo el tratamiento de segunda línea
Inmunoterapia en cáncer renal metastásico: redefiniendo el tratamiento de segunda línea Daniel Castellano Oncología Médica. Unidad de Tumores Genito-Urinarios Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre I + 12
More informationFifteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium November 4-5, 2016 Marriott Miami Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida, USA
The following presentation should not be regarded as an endorsement of a particular product/drug/technique by the speaker. The presentation topics were assigned to the speakers by the scientific committee
More informationWhen to Treat Beyond Progression with Systemic Therapies? Manuela Schmidinger Medical University of Vienna, Austria
When to Treat Beyond Progression with Systemic Therapies? Manuela Schmidinger Medical University of Vienna, Austria Is Treatment Beyond Progression a Valid Strategy? 1) NO YES? Is Treatment Beyond Progression
More informationI Kid(ney) You Not: Updates on Renal Cell Carcinoma
Disclosures I Kid(ney) You Not: Updates on Renal Cell Carcinoma Nothing to disclose Renee McAlister, PharmD, BCOP Clinical Pharmacist, GU/Melanoma Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center September 29, 2018 Objectives
More informationRenal Cell Cancer: Present and Future. Bernard Escudier, Gustave Roussy
Renal Cell Cancer: Present and Future Bernard Escudier, Gustave Roussy [HKIOF May 2017] Sponsored by Bristol- Myers Squibb OPDIVO Hong Kong prescribing information is available upon request Disclosures
More informationProstate cancer Management of metastatic castration sensitive cancer
18 th Annual Advances in Oncology - 2017 Prostate cancer Management of metastatic castration sensitive cancer Urothelial carcinoma Non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma Updates in metastatic urothelial
More informationDavid N. Robinson, MD
David N. Robinson, MD Background and Treatment of mrcc Background ~ 64,770 new cases of kidney/renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the US in 2012 with an estimated 13,570 deaths [1] ~ 75% are clear-cell
More informationLa revolución de la inmunoterapia: dónde la posicionamos? Javier Puente, MD, PhD
La revolución de la inmunoterapia: dónde la posicionamos? Javier Puente, MD, PhD Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos Medical Oncology Department Thoracic & Urological Cancer Unit Complutense University
More informationIndication for- and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy Kidney- and bladder cancer: Immunotherapy
Indication for- and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy Kidney- and bladder cancer: Immunotherapy Axel Bex, MD, PhD The Netherlands Cancer Institute Oslo, September 4, 2018 Financial and Other Disclosures
More informationNivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc): Results of a phase I trial
Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc): Results of a phase I trial H. Hammers, E.R. Plimack, J.R. Infante, M.S. Ernstoff, B. Rini, D.F. McDermott, A. Razak,
More informationImmunotherapy for the Treatment of Kidney and Bladder Cancer
Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Kidney and Bladder Cancer Alan J. Koletsky, MD Genitourinary Cancer Research Program, Lynn Cancer Institute Clinical Asistant Professor of Biomedical Science The Charles
More informationA Phase II Study of Atezolizumab With or Without Bevacizumab vs Sunitinib in Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients
A Phase II Study of Atezolizumab With or Without Bevacizumab vs Sunitinib in Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Viktor Grünwald, 1 David McDermott, 2 Michael Atkins, 3 Robert Motzer, 4
More informationImmunotherapy versus targeted treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The return game?
Immunotherapy versus targeted treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The return game? Sylvie NEGRIER MD, PhD Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon Université Lyon I IMMUNOTHERAPY: A LONG AND WIDING ROAD! WHERE
More informationSecond - Line Debate: Axitinib
Second - Line Debate: Axitinib Alain Ravaud, MD PhD Bordeaux, France DISCLOSURES Member of Global, European and/or French advisory board in RCC and/or GU tumors for Pfizer, Novartis, GSK, Roche, BMS, Merck.
More informationNegative Trials in RCC: Where Did We Go Wrong? Can We Do Better?
Negative Trials in RCC: Where Did We Go Wrong? Can We Do Better? 9 th European Kidney Cancer Symposium, Dublin, April 2014 Tim Eisen Tim Eisen - Disclosures Company Research Support Advisory Board Trial
More informationThe Really Important Questions Current Immunotherapy Trials are Not Answering
The Really Important Questions Current Immunotherapy Trials are Not Answering David McDermott, MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Harvard Medical School PD-1 Pathway
More informationMetastatic renal cancer (mrcc): Evidence-based treatment
Metastatic renal cancer (mrcc): Evidence-based treatment José M. Ruiz Morales, M.D. Hospital Médica Sur April 18th, 2018 4th ESO-ESMO Latin American Masterclass in Clinical Oncology Disclosures Consulting:
More informationMetastatic Renal Cancer Medical Treatment
Metastatic Renal Cancer Medical Treatment Bohuslav Melichar, M.D., Ph.D. Professor and Head Department of Oncology Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic Peculiarities
More informationUPDATE FROM ASCO GU FEBRUARY 2018, SAN FRANCISCO, USA. Prof. David Pfister University Hospital of Cologne Germany RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
UPDATE FROM ASCO GU FEBRUARY 2018, SAN FRANCISCO, USA Prof. David Pfister University Hospital of Cologne Germany RENAL CELL CARCINOMA DISCLAIMER Please note: The views expressed within this presentation
More informationImmunotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma. James Larkin
Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma James Larkin Disclosures Institutional research support: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Consultancy (all non-remunerated): Eisai, BMS, MSD, GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche/Genentech
More informationpan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Stakeholder Feedback on a pcodr Request for Advice Axitinib (Inlyta) for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Stakeholder Feedback on a pcodr Request for Advice Axitinib (Inlyta) for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Pfizer Canada Inc. June 29, 2017 3 Stakeholder Feedback on a pcodr
More informationMedical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Medical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma Lin Mei, MD Hematology-Oncology Fellow Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care Virginia Commonwealth University Educational Objectives Background of RCC (epidemiology,
More informationCarcinoma renale metastatico: cambia la pratica clinica? Camillo Porta Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Carcinoma renale metastatico: cambia la pratica clinica? Camillo Porta Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia New target, new agent (James Brugarolas) Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab and PD-L1
More informationThe Therapeutic Landscape in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
The Therapeutic Landscape in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Cora Sternberg, MD, FACP Chairman, Department of Medical Oncology San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital Rome, Italy What best describes the change in
More informationImmunotherapy for the Treatment of Cancer
Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Cancer Jason Muhitch, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Urology Department of Immunology Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Oncology for Scientists March 15,
More informationTargeted and immunotherapy in RCC
Targeted and immunotherapy in RCC Treatment options Surgery (radical VS partial nephrectomy) Thermal ablation therapy Surveillance Immunotherapy Molecular targeted therapy Molecular targeted therapy Targeted
More informationESMO Madrid, Spain Associate Professor Brian Costello Division of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Tumour Group, Mayo Clinic, USA
ESMO 2017 - Madrid, Spain Associate Professor Brian Costello Division of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Tumour Group, Mayo Clinic, USA HIGHLIGHTS ON RENAL CELL CARCINOMA CHECKMATE 214: EFFICACY AND SAFETY
More informationA Review in the Treatment Options for Renal Cell Cancer
A Review in the Treatment Options for Renal Cell Cancer Ali McBride, PharmD, MS BCPS, BCOP Clinical Coordinator Hematology/Oncology Department of Pharmacy The University of Arizona Cancer Center RENAL
More informationTreatment Algorithm and Therapy Management in mrcc. Manuela Schmidinger Medical University of Vienna Austria
Treatment Algorithm and Therapy Management in mrcc Manuela Schmidinger Medical University of Vienna Austria A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of mrcc 1. Sunitinib 2. Sorafenib 3. Bevacizumab+IFN-alpha
More informationTiming of targeted therapy in patients with low volume mrcc. Eli Rosenbaum Davidoff Cancer Center Beilinson Hospital
1 Timing of targeted therapy in patients with low volume mrcc Eli Rosenbaum Davidoff Cancer Center Beilinson Hospital 2 Wont be discussing: Symptomatic patients High volume disease Rapidly growing metastases
More informationEVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT
ipilimumab aligned with patient values. Although few patients had direct experience using this combination agent, patients indicated that side effects associated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab were few
More informationSequential Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma*
Sequential Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma* Bernard Escudier, MD, Marine Gross Goupil, MD, Christophe Massard, MD, and Karim Fizazi, MD, PhD Because of the recent approval of several drugs for the treatment
More informationEmerging Biomarkers of VEGF and mtor Inhibitors in 2015
Emerging Biomarkers of VEGF and mtor Inhibitors in 2015 Laurence Albiges Institut Gustave Roussy, France Fourteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium Miami, Florida, USA November 6-7, 2015 www.kidneycancersymposium.com
More informationWhy was HOPE 205 a Positive After Years of Negative Studies?
Why was HOPE 205 a Positive After Years of Negative Studies? Prof. Dr. med. Viktor Grünwald Klinik für Hämatologie, Hämostaseologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation Why do we pursue combinations?
More informationCheckpointinhibitoren in der Uro-Onkologie. Carsten Grüllich
Checkpointinhibitoren in der Uro-Onkologie Carsten Grüllich 07.02.15 T-cell Aktivierung und Regulation T cell Costimulation Recognition MHC I Peptide b2m mrna Tumorantigen Tumor Pardoll Nature Rev Cancer
More informationEvidenze cliniche nel trattamento del RCC
Criteri di scelta nel trattamento sistemico del carcinoma renale Evidenze cliniche nel trattamento del RCC Alessandro Morabito Unità Sperimentazioni Cliniche Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli Napoli,
More informationDISCLOSURE SLIDE. ARGOS: research funding, scientific advisory board
INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE 3 ADAPT TRIAL EVALUATING ROCAPULDENCEL-T (AGS-003), AN INDIVIDUALIZED IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEWLY-DIAGNOSED PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (MRCC)
More informationKidney Cancer Session
New Frontiers in Urologic Oncology September 12 th, 2015 Kidney Cancer Session Moderator: Philippe E. Spiess, M.D. Invited Faculty Members: Wade J. Sexton, MD Jeremiah J. Morrissey, PhD Agenda for Session
More informationCharacterization of Patients with Poor-
Characterization of Patients with Poor- Risk Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Hamieh L 1 *, McKay RR 1 *, Lin X 2, Simantov R 2, Choueiri TK 1 *Equal contributions 1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston,
More informationBrain mets under I.O.
Brain mets under I.O. Bernard Escudier Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Disclosure Honorarium received from BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer, Roche, Exelixis, Ipsen, Eisai, Calithera Travel Grant from BMS,
More informationCurrent Trends in Melanoma Theresa Medina, MD UCD Cutaneous Oncology
Current Trends in Melanoma Theresa Medina, MD UCD Cutaneous Oncology Overview Melanoma incidence and prevention Approach to surgical management of early melanoma Landscape of Advanced Melanoma Therapy
More informationImmunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers
Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers Susan F. Slovin, MD, PhD Genitourinary Oncology Service Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, New
More informationImmunotherapy for Melanoma. Michael Postow, MD Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Immunotherapy for Melanoma Michael Postow, MD Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Conflicts of Interest Bristol-Myers Squibb: -Research support -Participated
More informationAlternativas de Futuro en Cáncer Renal Enrique Grande
Alternativas de Futuro en Cáncer Renal Enrique Grande Hospital Ramón y Cajal de Madrid The ncreasingly Challenging Field of mrcc Sorafenib (US 2005, EU 2006) 3,4 Sunitinib (US & EU 2006) 3,4 Early 1940s:
More informationASCO 2011 Genitourinary Cancer
ASCO 2011 Genitourinary Cancer Expanding Options for Chronic Diseases? Walter Stadler, MD, FACP University of Chicago Disclosures (All Non-University &/or Financial Dealings with Potential, Real, or Perceived
More informationCamillo Porta S.C. di Oncologia Medica Università degli Studi di Pavia & I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
Keynote Lecture: Immunotherapy in GU cancer: where are we, and where are we going? Camillo Porta S.C. di Oncologia Medica Università degli Studi di Pavia & I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
More informationSergio Bracarda MD. Head, Medical Oncology Department of Oncology AUSL-8 Istituto Toscano Tumori (ITT) San Donato Hospital Arezzo, Italy
Sergio Bracarda MD Head, Medical Oncology Department of Oncology AUSL-8 Istituto Toscano Tumori (ITT) San Donato Hospital Arezzo, Italy Ninth European International Kidney Cancer Symposium Dublin 25-26
More informationMedical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) in the elderly ( 65y): Position of a SIOG Taskforce
Medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) in the elderly ( 65y): Position of a SIOG Taskforce Medical treatment of metastatic RCC in the elderly ( 65y): Members of the SIOG Taskforce
More informationOut of 129 patients with NSCLC treated with Nivolumab in a phase I trial, the OS rate at 5-y was about 16 %, clearly higher than historical rates.
6th Meeting on external quality assessment in molecular pathology, Naples, May 12-13, 2017 Overview of clinical development of checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors Pr Jaafar BENNOUNA University of Nantes
More informationWhat we learned from immunotherapy in the past years
What we learned from immunotherapy in the past years Paolo A. Ascierto, MD Unit Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy Disclosure
More informationMedia Release. Basel, 6 th February 2018
Media Release Basel, 6 th February 2018 Phase III IMmotion151 study showed Roche's TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab) reduced the risk of disease worsening or death by 26 percent in certain
More informationFifteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium
The following presentation should not be regarded as an endorsement of a particular product/drug/technique by the speaker. The presentation topics were assigned to the speakers by the scientific committee
More informationBiomarkers in Imunotherapy: RNA Signatures as predictive biomarker
Biomarkers in Imunotherapy: RNA Signatures as predictive biomarker Joan Carles, MD PhD Director GU, CNS and Sarcoma Program Department of Medical Oncology Vall d'hebron University Hospital Outline Introduction
More informationAdvances in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Advances in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Developed in collaboration Learning Objectives Upon completion, participants should be able to: Identify patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
More informationA randomized phase 2 trial of CRLX101 in combination with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) vs standard of care
A randomized phase 2 trial of CRLX101 in combination with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) vs standard of care Martin H. Voss 1, Thomas Hutson 2, Arif Hussain 3, Ulka
More informationCytoreductive Nephrectomy
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Stephen H. Culp, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Urology Outline The Historics of CN The current status of CN The importance of patient selection Cytoreductive
More informationUpdate on Immunotherapy in Advanced Melanoma. Ragini Kudchadkar, MD Assistant Professor Winship Cancer Institute Emory University Sea Island 2017
Update on Immunotherapy in Advanced Melanoma Ragini Kudchadkar, MD Assistant Professor Winship Cancer Institute Emory University Sea Island 2017 1 Outline Adjuvant Therapy Combination Immunotherapy Single
More informationClinical Biomarker in Kidney Cancer. Maria Nirvana Formiga, M.D., Ph.D.
Clinical Biomarker in Kidney Cancer Maria Nirvana Formiga, M.D., Ph.D. Disclosures I am on the Speaker s Bureau with Pfizer and Bayer Clinical trials of BMS and Pfizer Kidney Cancer 70% new cases in developed
More informationAtezolizumab Adjuvant Study: Medical Oncologist Perspective. Sumanta K. Pal, MD City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Atezolizumab Adjuvant Study: Medical Oncologist Perspective Sumanta K. Pal, MD City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Trial overview Key issues Outline Challenges with neoadjuvant therapy Placebo control
More informationFifteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium
The following presentation should not be regarded as an endorsement of a particular product/drug/technique by the speaker. The presentation topics were assigned to the speakers by the scientific committee
More informationImmunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Overview Background Immunotherapy clinical decision questions
More informationImmunotherapy for Kidney Cancer: Finally Center-Stage? Nizar M. Tannir, MD, FACP Professor and Deputy Chair GU Medical Oncology
Immunotherapy for Kidney Cancer: Finally Center-Stage? Nizar M. Tannir, MD, FACP Professor and Deputy Chair GU Medical Oncology 2013: Breakthrough of the Year December 20, 2013 Why immunotherapy? Immune
More informationImmunotherapy, an exciting era!!
Immunotherapy, an exciting era!! Yousef Zakharia MD University of Iowa and Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance Meeting, Chicago November 2016 Presentation Objectives l General approach to immunotherapy
More informationLinee guida terapeutiche oncologiche. Francesco Massari U.O.C. di Oncologia Medica d.u. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
Linee guida terapeutiche oncologiche Francesco Massari U.O.C. di Oncologia Medica d.u. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona 1 YOUNG SPECIALIST RENAL CARE Verona, 07-08 Marzo 2014 Clinical
More informationII sessione. Immunoterapia oltre la prima linea. Alessandro Tuzi ASST Sette Laghi, Varese
II sessione Immunoterapia oltre la prima linea Alessandro Tuzi ASST Sette Laghi, Varese AGENDA Immunotherapy post-chemo ( true 2/3L ) Immunotherapy in oncogene addicted NSCLC (yes/no? when?) Immunotherapy
More informationManagement of High Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma
Management of High Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma Peter E. Clark, MD Professor and Chair, Department of Urology Carolinas HealthCare System Chair, Urologic Oncology Levine Cancer Institute October 14, 2017
More informationCheckMate 025, as patients may derive a benefit, based on the opinion of the CGP and the mechanism of action of nivolumab.
CheckMate 025, as patients may derive a benefit, based on the opinion of the CGP and the mechanism of action of nivolumab. perc noted that patients with brain metastases were excluded from the CheckMate
More informationIMpower150: an exploratory analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients with EGFR mutations
IMpower150: an exploratory analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients with EGFR mutations Tony Mok, 1 Mark A. Socinski, 2 Martin Reck, 3 Robert Jotte, 4,5 Darren Wan-Teck Lim, 6 Federico Cappuzzo, 7 Francisco
More informationConversations in Oncology. November Kerry Hotel Pudong, Shanghai China
Conversations in Oncology November 12-13 Kerry Hotel Pudong, Shanghai China Immunotherapy of Lung Cancer Professor Caicun Zhou All materials are for scientific exchanges. Afatinib and nintedanib are not
More informationTargeted Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Targeted Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Brian I. Rini, M.D. Department of Solid Tumor Oncology Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland, Ohio
More informationIII Sessione I risultati clinici
10,30-13,15 III Sessione I risultati clinici Moderatori: Michele Maio - Valter Torri 10,30-10,45 Melanoma: anti CTLA-4 Vanna Chiarion Sileni Vanna Chiarion Sileni IOV-IRCCS,Padova Vanna.chiarion@ioveneto.it
More informationImmunotherapy of Melanoma Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD
Immunotherapy of Melanoma Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD Professor of Medicine Temple University School of Medicine Chief, Oncology & Hematology St. Luke s Cancer Center, Bethlehem, PA Overview Metastatic Melanoma
More informationPresentation Number: LBA18_PR. Lecture Time: 09:15-09:27. Speakers: Heinz-Josef J. Lenz (Los Angeles, US) Background
LBA18_PR - Durable Clinical Benefit With Nivolumab (NIVO) Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab (IPI) as First-Line Therapy in Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair Deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) Metastatic Colorectal
More informationpan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Lenvatinib (Lenvima) for Renal Cell Carcinoma
pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Lenvatinib (Lenvima) for Renal Cell Carcinoma January 4, 2019 DISCLAIMER Not a Substitute for Professional Advice This report is primarily
More informationIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS
IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS Dr Elizabeth Smyth Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust ESMO Gastric Cancer Preceptorship Valencia 2018 DISCLOSURES Honoraria for advisory role
More informationImmunotherapies for Advanced NSCLC: Current State of the Field. H. Jack West Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, Washington
Immunotherapies for Advanced NSCLC: Current State of the Field H. Jack West Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, Washington Nivolumab in Squamous NSCLC Chemo-pretreated (1 st line) Adv squamous NSCLC N =
More informationNew strategies and future of target therapy in advanced kidney cancer
New strategies and future of target therapy in advanced kidney cancer VHL Gene Inactivation VHL Complex Disrupted VHL Protein HIF1-a, HIF2-a Accumulation VEGF PDGF TGF-α, CXCR4 Angiogenesis Endothelial
More informationNew Therapies in HCC Bruno Sangro Clínica Universidad de Navarra. IdISNA. CIBERehd. Pamplona, Spain
New Therapies in HCC Bruno Sangro Clínica Universidad de Navarra. IdISNA. CIBERehd. Pamplona, Spain PHC 2018 - www.aphc.info EASL-EORTC Guidelines EASL EORTC Guidelines. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908-43. Systemic
More informationIMMUNE CHECKPOINT THERAPY FOR GENITOURINARY CANCERS: KIDNEY CANCER AND TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA
IMMUNE CHECKPOINT THERAPY FOR GENITOURINARY CANCERS: KIDNEY CANCER AND TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA Kathleen Mahoney, M.D., Ph.D. Instructor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Attending, Beth Israel Deaconess
More informationIl ruolo di PD-L1 (42%) tra la prima e la seconda linea di trattamento
Il ruolo di PD-L1 (42%) tra la prima e la seconda linea di trattamento Alessia Pochesci Divisione di Oncologia Toracica Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano Tutor: Prof.ssa Silvia Novello Dott.ssa Chiara
More informationesmo.org ESMO IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY CONGRESS 2017
ESMO IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY CONGRESS 2017 Primary PFS and safety analyses of a randomised Phase III study of carboplatin + paclitaxel +/ bevacizumab, with or without atezolizumab in 1L non-squamous metastatic
More informationOverall Survival (OS) Analysis From an Expanded Access Program (EAP) of Nivolumab (NIVO) in Combination with Ipilimumab (IPI) in Patients with Advanced Melanoma (MEL) David Hogg, Paul B. Chapman, 2 Mario
More informationRiunione Monotematica A.I.S.F The future of liver diseases. HEPATIC NEOPLASMS The challenge for new drugs
Riunione Monotematica A.I.S.F. 2016 The future of liver diseases Milan 13 th -15 th October 2016 Centro Congressi Fondazione Cariplo HEPATIC NEOPLASMS The challenge for new drugs Massimo Iavarone Gastroenterology
More informationNSCLC: immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. Paolo Bironzo Oncologia Polmonare AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga Orbassano (To)
NSCLC: immunotherapy as a first-line treatment Paolo Bironzo Oncologia Polmonare AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga Orbassano (To) The 800-pound gorilla Platinum-based chemotherapy is the SOC for 1st-line therapy in
More informationImmunoterapia di 1 linea Evidenze e Prospettive Future
Immunoterapia di 1 linea Evidenze e Prospettive Future Sara Pilotto Oncologia Medica, Dipart. di Medicina, Università di Verona, A.O.U.I. Verona sara.pilotto@univr.it Negrar, 30 ottobre 2018 Disclosures
More informationCheckMate 012: Safety and Efficacy of First Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
CheckMate 12: Safety and Efficacy of First Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Abstract 31 Hellmann MD, Gettinger SN, Goldman J, Brahmer J, Borghaei H, Chow LQ, Ready NE,
More informationImmunotherapy in the clinic. Lung Cancer. Marga Majem 20 octubre 2017
Immunotherapy in the clinic. Lung Cancer Marga Majem 20 octubre 2017 mmajem@santpau.cat Immunotherapy in the clinic. Lung Cancer Agenda Where we come from? Immunotherapy in Second line Immunotherapy in
More informationAVEO Overview. December 2017
AVEO Overview December 2017 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical
More informationI farmaci immunoterapici. Stefano Fogli UO Farmacologia Clinica e Farmacogenetica Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale Università di Pisa
I farmaci immunoterapici Stefano Fogli UO Farmacologia Clinica e Farmacogenetica Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale Università di Pisa History of Cancer Immunotherapy Discovery of dendritic
More information