Taller Haustral Folds in the Proximal Colon: A Potential Factor Contributing to Interval Colorectal Cancer
|
|
- Alexina Copeland
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RESEARCH ARTICLE J O U R N A L O F C O L O N A N D R E C T A L C A N C E R ISSN NO: DOI : /issn jcrc Taller Haustral Folds in the Proximal Colon: A Potential Factor Contributing to Interval Colorectal Cancer Atalie C. Thompson, M.D., M.P.H. 1, Richard H. Jones, M.D. 1, Peter D. Poullos, M.D. 2, Subhas Banerjee, M.D. 3, Lewis K. Shin, M.D. 2,4 1. Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, CA Department of Radiology, Stanford Hospital, 300 Pasteur Drive H1307 MC 5105, Stanford, CA Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Hospital, 300 Pasteur Drive H0262A MC 5244, Stanford, CA Department of Radiology, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave. MC 114, Palo Alto, CA ABSTRACT Missed cancers have been reported at higher frequencies in the right colon despite optical colonoscopy screening. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are regional differences in haustral fold height between the ascending, transverse, and descending colon using CT colonography (CTC). 50 supine CTC datasets from 50 asymptomatic, adult patients were analyzed (NCI-CBIIT instance of the National Biomedical Imaging Archive). At least 5 consecutive, pairs of unobscured haustral folds in each colonic segment were necessary to be included in this study. Of an initial 201 patients, 151 were excluded due to suboptimal colonic distension, retained fluid, tortuosity, and diverticulosis. For each dataset, the heights of the non-dependent haustral folds were measured in the ascending, transverse, and descending colon on 2D multiplanar reformations. Differences in mean HFHs were assessed using a hierarchical generalized linear mixed model. A total of 2079 colonic folds were measured: 625 in the ascending colon (including the cecum), 687 in the transverse colon, and 767 in the descending colon. The mean number of folds measured per segment was 6.87 ± Mean HFHs were significantly taller in the ascending colon (14.62 ± 5.47 mm) than in the transverse (9.49 ± 3.65mm) or descending (6.53 ± 3.12mm) colon; mean HFHs were also significantly taller in the transverse than the descending colon, (P<0.0001, for all comparisons). In conclusion, taller colonic haustral folds are present in the proximal colon and may contribute to more frequently missed lesions (e.g. polyps) in the right colon by conventional, optical colonoscopy. Corresponding author: Lewis K. Shin, MD, Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, 300 Pasteur Drive, H1307, Stanford CA , Phone: , Fax: , lshin@stanford.edu KEYWORDS: Haustral Fold Heights; Computed Tomographic Colonography; Virtual Colonoscopy; Optical Colonoscopy; Colorectal Cancer Screening Received Dec 19, 2015; Accepted Feb 25, 2016; Published Mar 07, 2016; JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 44
2 INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States today, with approximately 150,000 incident cases and 50,000 deaths reported each year [1, 2]. The five-year survival rate approaches 90% if the cancer is discovered at an early stage, but is 12% if distant metastases are present [2]. Since optical colonoscopy (OC) allows for the early detection and removal of precancerous adenomas, it is widely considered the best modality for colon cancer screening and prevention [3]. Several longitudinal studies have shown significant reductions in the incidence of CRC following colonoscopic polypectomy [4-7]. Nevertheless, colon cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer nationwide despite increasing rates of screening [2, 8]. Colonoscopy offers incomplete protection from colon cancer, and interval cancers unfortunately do develop in patients despite their having undergone optical colonoscopy. This may occur for a variety of reasons, including aggressive tumor biology resulting in a newly developed fast growing cancer or incomplete resection of a visualized adenomatous polyp, with recurrence progressing to cancer. Interval cancers may also arise if adenomatous polyps are missed at colonoscopy. Tandem colonoscopy studies have confirmed relatively high adenoma miss rates of 6-27% at OC, with miss rates for small polyps less than 6 mm in size at the upper end of this range [9-12]. For advanced adenomas the miss rate in one study was as high as 11% [9]. Polyps may be missed at colonoscopy for a variety of reasons, including inadequate bowel preparation, insufficient colonic distention, and poor colonoscopy technique including rapid withdrawal of the colonoscope in less than 6 minutes [13, 14]. Small or flat polyps may not be recognized by less experienced endoscopists. Performance of colonoscopy by a nongastroenterologist, such as a primary care physician or surgeon, increases the chance that a potential cancer will be overlooked [15-18]. Recent evidence suggests that interval cancers are more likely to develop in the right (i.e. cecum and ascending colon) and transverse colon than in the left colon [15, 19-24]. The postulated reasons for this differential distribution are varied. A proportion of colonoscopies are incomplete where the cecum cannot be reached for technical reasons. In addition, less experienced endoscopists may occasionally mistake anatomic landmarks such as the hepatic flexure for the cecum. Incomplete colonoscopies with failure of cecal intubation are more likely when performed by endoscopists with less training, and/or lower procedural volumes [25], and when colonoscopy is performed in office settings [15, 25, 26]. A delay between completion of the bowel preparation and colonoscopy, can result in the accumulation of bile and thick mucus in the right colon [27], potentially obscuring polyps, particularly those that are flat. A disproportionate number of interval CRC with microsatellite instability arise in flat serrated lesions [28] that are more common in the proximal colon [29-31]. These adenomas tend to carry aggressive mutations like BRAF V600E [32, 33]. Because they are flatter and have ambiguous color and borders, serrated lesions are also harder to identify during optical colonoscopy [9, 34], especially if withdrawal times are rapid [35]. Adequate visualization of the mucosa on the proximal side of haustral folds remains a challenge given current limitations in standard colonoscope technology and endoscopic technique [36, 37]. Polyps on the proximal aspect of taller colonic folds may be more difficult to visualize at colonoscopy, and studies have indicated that many polyps missed at colonoscopy are on the proximal aspects of colonic folds [37]. We therefore hypothesized that the higher incidence of interval cancers in the proximal compared to the distal JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 45
3 colon may stem in part from the existence of taller haustral folds proximally. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate whether the anatomic heights of haustral folds may differ between the ascending (including the cecum), transverse, and descending colon using CT virtual colonoscopy and thus potentially help explain regional differences in interval CRC development. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Biomedical Imaging Archive (NBIA) is a free online national repository of PHI de-identified Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology. We reviewed 201 supine Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) patient datasets selected from the beginning of the NBIA s Virtual Colonoscopy database ( imaging.nci.nih.gov/ncia/login.jsf) made publicly available by the (Virtual) CT Colonography clinical trial [38]. Because the datasets were completely deidentified, this study was not considered human subjects research by our Institutional Review Board; thus we were granted permission to conduct our investigation. A more complete description of the protocol has been previously published in the New England Journal of Medicine [39]. A total of 1233 asymptomatic adults patients age 40 to 79 from three clinical sites underwent same-day screening CTC followed by OC. Twenty-four hours prior to the procedure, patients underwent standard bowel preparation with 90 ml of oral sodium phosphate (Fleet 1 preparation, Fleet Pharmaceuticals) and 10 mg of bisacodyl. Tagging of solid stool with 500 ml of barium (2.1% by weight; Scan C, Lafayette Pharmaceuticals) and of luminal fluid with 120 ml of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium (Gastrografin, Braco Diagnostics) was performed. Inclusion criteria were: (1) adequate colonic distension and (2) presence of measurable folds. Having a minimum of at least five consecutive measurable haustral fold pairs in a given colonic segment was established as a marker of adequate bowel distention for optimal measurement of folds. Measurable folds were defined as folds that were not obscured or distorted by retained fluid, luminal collapse, tortuosity or diverticulosis. As haustral folds meet at the teniae coli, two of the three folds were each measured with the most dependent fold excluded; the most dependent folds were most often obscured by fluid if present (Figure 1A). Measurements of fold heights were made on 2D multiplanar reformations; the imaging plane demonstrating the folds in cross-section was established for optimal measurement of fold heights (Figure 1B). Due to the high frequency of tortuosity, suboptimal distention relative to other colonic segments, distortion of the folds and diverticulosis relative to other colonic segments, the sigmoid colon was not included in this study. Figure 1A. Axial CT-Colonography image demonstrating dependent fluid tagging (*) obscuring a dependent haustral fold (white arrow) with a pair of unobscured, non-dependent haustral folds (black arrows). Note: difficulty in visualization of haustral fold pair due to slice selection in the axial plane. A single reviewer evaluated all data sets using a DICOM image viewer (OsiriX v4.0) for inclusion into this study. JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 46
4 RESULTS We measured haustral fold heights (HFHs) of the colon in 50 patients. The mean age of the study patients was 60.5 ± 6.8 years. Thirty-five of the patients were male and 15 were female. A total of 2079 colonic folds were measured: 625 in the ascending colon (including the cecum), 687 in the transverse colon, and 767 in the descending colon. The mean number of folds measured per segment was 6.87 ± This minimum number of five fold pairs was within one standard deviation of the mean number of fold pairs measured per segment (6.87 ± 2.11). Figure 2 shows histograms of the distribution of colon fold measurements in each of the three colonic segments. Mean haustral fold heights in the ascending colon (including the cecum) (14.62 ± 5.47 mm) were Figure 1B. Coronal reformat demonstrating adequately distended ascending colon with at least five nondependent haustral folds (black arrows) clearly visualized. (Multiplanar CT Colonography, Haustral Fold Selection, Axial). Fifty patient datasets were included that met the minimum criterion for fold measurement in the ascending (including the cecum), transverse, and descending colonic segments and were of sufficient diagnostic quality. This methodology allowed us to achieve an optimal dataset with complete measurements in all three colonic segments for each of the included patients. The segments could thus be compared directly to each other within a patient, so that each patient served as their own internal control for potential demographic or clinical confounders. Differences in average fold height were assessed by statistical analysis using a hierarchical generalized linear mixed model with log link function, in which colon region served as a fixed factor and the patient served as a random factor. Both 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) and P-values were generated using STATA (Release 9.2; StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Figure 2. Distribution of Haustral Fold Heights in the Ascending, Transverse and Descnding Colon. Y-axis shows percentages of height in each colonic segment, respectively. significantly taller than in the transverse (9.49 ± 3.65 mm, P<0.0001) or descending colon (6.53 ± 3.12 mm, P<0.0001) (Table 1). Folds in the transverse colon were also significantly taller than in the descending colon JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 47
5 (P<0.0001). The ascending colon (including the cecum) folds were 7.60mm (95% CI: mm) and 4.61mm (95% CI: mm) taller than the descending or transverse haustral folds, respectively (Table 2). Table 1: Regional Mean Heights of Colon Haustral Folds Region of Colon Mean height ± standard deviation in millimeters Ascending (with cecum) ± 5.47 Transverse 9.49 ± 3.65 Descending 6.53 ± 3.12 offered by optical colonoscopy in the right and transverse colon. Optical colonoscopy has long been considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening because of its therapeutic capability for resecting adenomatous polyps identified during mucosal inspection [6, 7]. However, colonoscopy offers incomplete protection on against colon cancer, particularly in the right colon (i.e. cecum and ascending colon). Many factors may explain the higher rates of right-sided interval cancers [15, 17, 19-24, 40]. For example, the endoscopist may not be able to reach the cecum. In large academic gastroenterologist run endoscopy units in the U.S. and Europe, the incomplete Table 2: Hierarchical Generalized Linear Mixed Model Comparing Mean Haustral Fold Heights Region of Colon Difference of mean heights (millimeters) 95% Confidence Interval P-value Ascending vs. Transverse < Ascending vs. Descending < Transverse vs. Descending < DISCUSSION Our study demonstrates that the height of haustral folds increases as one moves proximally in the colon. Folds in the ascending colon (including the cecum) were significantly taller than those in the transverse and descending colon (P<0.0001). Transverse colonic folds were likewise taller than those in the descending colon (P<0.0001). Such differences in regional anatomy may potentially impact the sensitivity of optical colonoscopy in detecting polyps and cancers in different parts of the colon. Polyps hidden on the proximal aspects of the taller folds in the ascending (including the cecum) and transverse colon may be harder to detect at optical colonoscopy. This may be one additional factor contributing to the lower protection colonoscopy rate is around % [22, 41, 42]. The rate of incomplete colonoscopy is likely to be higher among less experienced endoscopists, in community settings, and at low volume centers. Despite bowel prep, adherent bile in the right colon may impair visualization of flat polypse. In addition there is a higher prevalence of serrated flat lesions with aggressive tumor markers located in the proximal colon [29-31]. Such flat lesions are difficult to identify at colonoscopy [35]. The limited view offered behind prominent mucosal folds by OC is a potential reason that traditional colonoscopy misses some polyps [36, 37]. An early study published in 1978 by Miller et al. found that endoscopists tended to neglect lesions situated on the proximal side of valves and haustral folds that were subsequently identified by barium enema [36]. Pickhardt et al. also found that JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 48
6 71.4% of lesions missed at colonoscopy but found on CTC were located on the proximal aspects of colonic folds [37]. Retroflexion of the colonoscope does allow examination of the proximal aspect of colonic folds and in one study, retroflexion of the colonoscope during withdrawal through the right colon improved detection of adenomas in the right colon in 5.8% of patients [43]. Unfortunately, retroflexion of standard colonoscopes in the proximal colon is difficult due to the large turn radius of the tip of the colonoscope, and the majority of endoscopists do not practice this technique. Since colonic folds can obscure the view of polyps, and more interval cancers develop in the right colon despite colonoscopy, we postulated that taller folds might exist in the cecum, ascending and transverse colon where more interval cancers develop. Our study has confirmed this hypothesis. To our knowledge, our study is the first to document higher colonic folds in the ascending colon compared with the transverse and descending colon. We were able to show that colonic haustral folds become increasingly taller as one moves proximally along the colon, with folds of the transverse colon taller than descending colon, and ascending colonic folds taller than transverse colonic folds. This additional height of right colonic folds may further impede thorough visualization of lesions located on the proximal aspect of these taller folds [36, 37], which may be an additional important factor, explaining why colonoscopy offers less protection from interval colon cancer in the right colon. Moreover, we also demonstrated that colonic folds are significantly taller in the transverse than the descending colon. These findings may explain why OC did not offer significant protection against interval CRC in the cecum and ascending colon (PR=0.99, 95% CI ) or in the hepatic flexure and transverse colon (PR=1.21, 95% CI ) when studied by Brenner et al. [22]. Furthermore, patients who underwent OC in the prior ten years were significantly less likely to develop interval CRC in the splenic flexure and descending colon (PR 0.36, 95% CI ) when compared to patients without colonoscopy [22]. Such findings suggest that OC may be a less sensitive modality in the cecum, ascending and transverse colon, which may be partially explained by the taller folds we have documented in those regions of the colon. Several studies have suggested that CTC may have comparable sensitivity and specificity to colonoscopy, especially in detecting advanced neoplasms [44, 45]. Addition of 3-D fly-through interpretation [46] and preparation with both cathartic and tagging agents [47] may further improve the screening capability of CTC. Moreover, unlike colonoscopy, the area behind colonic folds is not a blind spot for CTC. CT Colonography may thus prove advantageous for detecting polyps located on the proximal aspect of colonic folds [37]. In one meta-analysis of CTC, only 6 of 16 cancers located proximal to the splenic flexure were missed compared with 10 cancers missed in the rectosigmoid [47]. This would suggest that haustral fold heights may contribute to discrepant regional rates of colon cancer; however, future, longer-term research is needed to determine if relative rates of right-sided colon cancers are decreased with CTC screening or other advanced endoscopic techniques that employ or bidirectional endoscopy. Our study has several limitations. First, haustral fold morphology can vary depending on luminal distention. Colonic fold thickening has been described with insufficient luminal distention [48], while overdistention can lead to fold effacement. While only patients with well-distended colonic segments were included in this study, the effects of subtle differences in regional bowel distention on fold heights could not be adjusted for. Second, our ability to identify measurable colonic folds was markedly diminished in the sigmoid colon compared to other colonic segments as previously described, leading us to exclude the sigmoid colon from JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 49
7 the analysis. Thus, our inference is limited to the descending colon, and does not necessarily generalize to other parts of the left colon. In addition we measured fold heights only in datasets that included at least five consecutive measurable folds in all three colonic segments. It is possible that taller folds may have existed elsewhere in these segments but were not measured because they were isolated and thus did not fit our minimum criterion. We also excluded patient datasets if measurable folds could not be identified in one of the colonic segments. While this inclusion criterion allowed us to achieve a dataset where every patient had complete comparable measurements in the colonic segments, it also limited our patient sample size and led to imbalance on the potential effect modifier of sex. Future studies would need to reproduce these results in larger populations with a balanced proportion of males and females to ensure there is no interaction by gender. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, our study indicates that regional differences in haustral fold height exist, with significantly taller folds found in the proximal colon. The potential structural obstruction of view caused by taller haustral folds in the proximal colon, may possibly offer an additional factor explaining the lower protection against interval colon cancer offered by standard optical colonoscopy in the right and transverse colon compared to the left colon. CT Colonography and advanced colonoscopy techniques (e.g. bidirectional or viewing) offer advantages to evaluate and detect precancerous adenomatous polyps and lesions located behind folds, which may be most valuable in the proximal colon as it may translate into lower rates of right-sided colon cancers. Future trials are needed to compare the protection offered by these techniques relative to traditional OC in the prevention of interval colorectal cancer. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The data for this study was provided courtesy of Dr. Richard Choi, Virtual Colonoscopy Center, Walter Reed Army Medical Center ( CIP/ Virtual+Colonoscopy). Biostatistical analysis was performed by Jarrett Rosenberg, Ph.D. in the Stanford University Hospital, Department of Radiology. Richard Jones updated current affiliation is: Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States. ABBREVIATIONS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) Confidence intervals (CIs) Haustral fold heights (HFHs) Optical Colonoscopy (OC) National Biomedical Imaging Archive (NBIA) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) REFERENCES 1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Jan-Feb 2012;62(1): Society AC. Cancer Facts and Figures Atlanta Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. Nov ;149(9): Manser CN, Bachmann LM, Brunner J, Hunold F, Bauerfeind P, Marbet UA. Colonoscopy screening markedly reduces the occurrence of colon carcinomas and carcinoma-related death: a closed cohort study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Jul 2012;76(1): JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 50
8 5. Myer PA, Mannalithara A, Singh G, Ladabaum U. Proximal and distal colorectal cancer resection rates in the United States since widespread screening by colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. Nov 2012;143(5): Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. The New England journal of medicine. Dec ;329(27): Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. The New England journal of medicine. Feb ;366(8): Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. NIH Consenses and State-of-the-Science Statements. Feb 24, Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. Apr 2008;40(4): Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS. Prospective Blinded Trial of the Colonoscopic Miss-Rate of Large Colorectal Polyps. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Mar-Apr 1991;37(2): Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, Mcgee D, Garewal H. Prospective-Study of the Frequency and Size Distribution of Polyps Missed by Colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer I. Nov ;82(22): Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. Jan 1997;112(1): Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. The New England journal of medicine. Dec ;355 (24): Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening American Journal of Gastroenterology. Mar 2009;104(3): Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen ZL, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: A population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. Jan 2007;132(1): Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Kaster S, Buckley JS. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology. Jan 1997;112(1): Singh H, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM, Demers AA, Bernstein CN. Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. The American journal of gastroenterology. Mar 2010;105 (3): ; quiz Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN. Colorectal cancers after a negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. Apr 2007;132(4):A149-A Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. Jan ;150(1): Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Hoffmeister M. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut. Nov 2012;61 (11): Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Rickert A, Hoffmeister M. Protection From Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy A Population-Based, Case-Control Study. Ann Intern Med. Jan ;154(1):22-U Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Protection From Right- and Left- JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 51
9 Sided Colorectal Neoplasms After Colonoscopy: Population-Based Study. J Natl Cancer I. Jan ;102(2): Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Mar 2005;61(3): Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Rabeneck L. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. Oct 2008;6(10): ; quiz Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. Jun 2007;132 (7): Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. Oct 2007;189(4): Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A, et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. Oct ;12(38): Goldstein NS, Bhanot P, Odish E, Hunter S. Hyperplastic-like colon polyps that preceded microsatellite-unstable adenocarcinomas. American journal of clinical pathology. Jun 2003;119(6): Hetzel JT, Huang CS, Coukos JA, et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. The American journal of gastroenterology. Dec 2010;105(12): Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL, Eckert GJ, Rex DK. Prevalence and Variable Detection of Proximal Colon Serrated Polyps During Screening Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol H. Jan 2011;9(1): Kahi CJ, Li X, Eckert GJ, Rex DK. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in averagerisk men and women. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Mar 2012;75(3): Rosenberg DW, Yang S, Pleau DC, et al. Mutations in BRAF and KRAS differentially distinguish serrated versus non-serrated hyperplastic aberrant crypt foci in humans. Cancer research. Apr ;67(8): Samowitz WS, Sweeney C, Herrick J, et al. Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers. Cancer research. Jul ;65(14): Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA, et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. The American journal of gastroenterology. Sep 2012;107(9): ; quiz 1314, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Jan Miller RE, Lehman G. Polypoid colonic lesions undetected by endoscopy. Radiology. Nov 1978;129 (2): Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. Sep ;141(5): Kirby J. Virtual Colonoscopy. 2011; wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/cip/virtual+colonoscopy. 39. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 52
10 neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. The New England journal of medicine. Dec ;349(23): Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Kliewer EV, Mahmud SM, Bernstein CN. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology. Oct 2010;139(4): Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. CT Colonography: Pitfalls in Interpretation. Radiologic clinics of North America. Jan 2013;51(1): Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, Raptopoulos V, Farrell RJ, Morrin MM. CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology. Aug 2007;244 (2): Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Jul-Aug 1993;39(4): Hewett DG, Rex DK. Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aug 2011;74(2): El-Maraghi RH, Kielar AZ. CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy for Screening Asymptomatic Patients for Colorectal Cancer: A Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) Analysis. Acad Radiol. May 2009;16(5): Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. The New England journal of medicine. Oct ;357(14): Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J, et al. The costeffectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia. The American journal of gastroenterology. Feb 2007;102(2): Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal Cancer: CT Colonography and Colonoscopy for Detection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology. May 2011;259(2): JCRC CC-license DOI : /issn jcrc Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 53
Retroflexion and prevention of right-sided colon cancer following colonoscopy: How I approach it
Retroflexion and prevention of right-sided colon cancer following colonoscopy: How I approach it Douglas K Rex 1 MD, MACG 1. Indiana University School of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology
More informationColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related. Colonoscopic Miss Rates for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2004;127:452 456 Colonoscopic Miss Rates for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis BRIAN BRESSLER,* LAWRENCE F. PASZAT,, CHRISTOPHER VINDEN,, CINDY LI, JINGSONG HE, and
More informationAlberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (ACRCSP) Post Polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines
Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (ACRCSP) Post Polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines June 2013 ACRCSP Post Polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines - 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background... 3 Terms, Definitions
More informationEvolving Issues in Colonoscopy. May 19, This 3rd part of the lectures today will be presented by: Stanley H. Weiss, MD, FACP, FACE
Evolving Issues in Colonoscopy May 19, 2011 This 3rd part of the lectures today will be presented by: Stanley H. Weiss, MD, FACP, FACE Professor, Preventive Medicine & Community Health, UMDNJ NJMS Professor,
More informationCircumstances in which colonoscopy misses cancer
1 Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2 Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 3 The Dalla Lana School of Public Health,
More informationMerit-based Incentive Payment system (MIPS) 2018 Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Measure Specifications
Merit-based Incentive Payment system (MIPS) 2018 Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Measure Specifications This document contains a listing of the clinical quality measures which the New Hampshire
More informationCancer Prevention and Control Program Colloquium series, January 17, 2014 Sudha Xirasagar, MBBS, PhD
Cancer Prevention and Control Program Colloquium series, January 17, 2014 Sudha Xirasagar, MBBS, PhD Colorectal Cancer: A tale of WHY NO BEHIND SHOULD BE LEFT BEHIND (Steven Lloyd, 2006) Summary of presentation
More informationQuality Indicators in Colonoscopy
Symposium Symposium III - Lower GI : Quality Colonoscopy Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy Kyu Chan Huh Department of Internal medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea Introduction
More informationCombination of Sigmoidoscopy and a Fecal Immunochemical Test to Detect Proximal Colon Neoplasia
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2009;7:1341 1346 Combination of Sigmoidoscopy and a Fecal Immunochemical Test to Detect Proximal Colon Neoplasia JUN KATO,* TAMIYA MORIKAWA,* MOTOAKI KURIYAMA,*
More informationOptical colonoscopy (OC) is widely accepted as the
Article Location of Adenomas Missed by Optical Colonoscopy Perry J. Pickhardt, MD; Pamela A. Nugent, MD; Pauline A. Mysliwiec, MD, MPH; J. Richard Choi, ScD, MD; and William R. Schindler, DO Background:
More informationCitation for published version (APA): Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn, T. R. (2013). Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy de Wijkerslooth, T.R. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn,
More informationC olorectal adenomas are reputed to be precancerous
568 COLORECTAL CANCER Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese Y Yamaji, T Mitsushima, H Ikuma, H Watabe, M Okamoto, T
More informationSupplementary Appendix
Supplementary Appendix This appendix has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Supplement to: Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators
More informationFive-Year Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia after Negative Screening Colonoscopy
The new england journal of medicine original article Five-Year Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia after Negative Screening Colonoscopy Thomas F. Imperiale, M.D., Elizabeth A. Glowinski, R.N., Ching Lin-Cooper,
More informationWhen a patient develops colorectal cancer within a few
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2013;11:768 773 Avoiding and Defending Malpractice Suits for Postcolonoscopy Cancer: Advice From an Expert Witness DOUGLAS K. REX Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology,
More informationMeasuring the quality of colonoscopy: Where are we now and where are we going?
Measuring the quality of colonoscopy: Where are we now and where are we going? Timothy D. Imler, MD Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
More informationFEP Medical Policy Manual
FEP Medical Policy Manual Effective Date: January 15, 2018 Related Policies: None Virtual Colonoscopy/Computed Tomography Colonography Description Computed tomography colonography (CTC), also known as
More informationColorectal Cancer Screening: Colonoscopy, Potential and Pitfalls. Disclosures: None. CRC: still a major public health problem
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Colonoscopy, Potential and Pitfalls Disclosures: None Jonathan P. Terdiman, M.D. Professor of Clinical Medicine University of California, San Francisco CRC: still a major public
More informationTitle Description Type / Priority
Merit-based Incentive Payment system (MIPS) 2019 Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Measure Specifications Summary Listing of QCDR measures supported by the NHCR Measure # NHCR4 NHCR5 GIQIC12 GIQIC15
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE: Clinical Endoscopy
ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Clinical Endoscopy Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group Daniel
More informationColorectal Polyps in Average-Risk Thais: Colorectal Polyps in Average-Risk Thais: Evaluation with CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)
80 THAI J GASTROENTEROL 2010 Original Article Pantongrag-Brown L Laothamatas J Pak-Art P Patanajareet P ABSTRACT Objective: To find the prevalence of significant colorectal polyps in average-risk Thais,
More informationNatural history of adenomas by CT colonography Evelien Dekker Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius, Jaap Stoker
Natural history of adenomas by CT colonography Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius, Jaap Stoker Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands Possible conflicts of interest None Colonoscopy.. plus polypectomy
More informationColorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
1 Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Jeffrey Lee MD, MAS Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine University of California, San Francisco jeff.lee@ucsf.edu Objectives Review the various colorectal
More informationDigestive Health Southwest Endoscopy 2016 Quality Report
Digestive Health 2016 Quality Report Our 2016 our quality and value management program focused on one primary area of interest: Performing high quality colonoscopy High quality Colonoscopy We selected
More informationCarol A. Burke, MD, FACG
Updated Guidelines for CRC C Screening and Surveillance Carol A. Burke MD, FACG, FASGE, FACP Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH Gastroenterology t 2012;143:844 143 Gut 2010;59:666 1 Caveat for all Recommendations
More informationVariation in Detection of Adenomas and Polyps by Colonoscopy and Change Over Time With a Performance Improvement Program
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2009;7:1335 1340 Variation in Detection of Adenomas and Polyps by Colonoscopy and Change Over Time With a Performance Improvement Program AASMA SHAUKAT,*, CRISTINA
More informationThe Natural History of Right-Sided Lesions
The Natural History of Right-Sided Lesions Jasper L.A. Vleugels Dept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. None Disclosures Agenda Is there evidence that
More informationResearch Article Development of Polyps and Cancer in Patients with a Negative Colonoscopy: A Follow-Up Study of More Than 20 Years
ISRN Gastroenterology, Article ID 261302, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/261302 Research Article Development of Polyps and Cancer in Patients with a Negative Colonoscopy: A Follow-Up Study of More
More informationRepeat colonoscopy s value in gastrointestinal bleeding
Online Submissions: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/ wjge@wjgnet.com doi:10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.56 World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013 February 16; 5(2): 56-61 ISSN 1948-5190 (online) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
More informationCT Colonography: Clinical case review. Beth G. McFarland, MD, FACR SSM St. Joseph, St. Charles, MO
CT Colonography: Clinical case review Beth G. McFarland, MD, FACR SSM St. Joseph, St. Charles, MO Disclosures Consultant, Vital Images Part I CTC Overview of different morphologic types:» Focal polyp vs
More informationScreening for colorectal cancer. Stuart Taylor Consultant Radiologist University College Hospital
Screening for colorectal cancer Stuart Taylor Consultant Radiologist University College Hospital Topics Rationale for screening Screening methods CTC (+CAD) as a screening tool Epidemiology 943,000 cases
More informationTechnology and Interventions to Improve ADR
Technology and Interventions to Improve ADR Aasma Shaukat, MD MPH, FACG GI Section Chief, Minneapolis VAMC Associate Professor, University of Minnesota Outline Why is quality important? Fundamentals of
More informationCurrent trends in virtual colonoscopy
Current trends in virtual colonoscopy Zarina I Lockhat, FFRad(D)SA Department of Radiology, Pretoria Academic Hospital and Irma van de Werke, FRCR Department of Radiology, Kalafong Hospital and André du
More informationAdenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death
The new england journal of medicine original article Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death Douglas A. Corley, M.D., Ph.D., Christopher D. Jensen, Ph.D., Amy R. Marks, M.P.H., Wei
More informationBenchmarking For Colonoscopy. Technology and Technique to Improve Adenoma Detection
Benchmarking For Colonoscopy Technology and Technique to Improve Adenoma Detection Objectives 1. Review the latest data on performance characteristics and efficacy for colon cancer prevention 2. Highlight
More informationSessile serrated polyps: Cancer risk and appropriate surveillance
REVIEW CME CREDIT EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Readers will understand the role of the recently recognized serrated neoplasia pathway in the development of colorectal cancer ROHIT MAKKAR, MD St. Michael s Hospital,
More informationScreening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has proven effectiveness. Colorectal Cancers Detected After Colonoscopy Frequently Result From Missed Lesions
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2010;8:858 864 Colorectal Cancers Detected After Colonoscopy Frequently Result From Missed Lesions HEIKO POHL*,,, and DOUGLAS J. ROBERTSON*,, *Outcomes Group and
More informationOptimal Colonoscopy Surveillance Interval after Polypectomy
REVIEW Clin Endosc 2016;49:359-363 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.080 Print ISSN 2234-2400 On-line ISSN 2234-2443 Open Access Optimal Colonoscopy Surveillance Interval after Polypectomy Tae Oh Kim Department
More informationResearch Article Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy according to Indication
Hindawi Gastroenterology Research and Practice Volume 2017, Article ID 7207595, 6 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7207595 Research Article Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy according
More informationComputerized tomography colonography (CTC), also referred
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2008;6:497 502 CLINICAL IMAGING Computerized Tomography Colonography: A Primer for Gastroenterologists PERRY J. PICKHARDT and DAVID H. KIM Department of Radiology,
More informationCT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): Benchmark Values From a Clinical Screening Program
Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research Pooler et al. Benchmark C-RADS Values From a Clinical Screening Program Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research B. Dustin Pooler 1 David H. Kim Vu P. Lam Elizabeth
More informationEarly detection and screening for colorectal neoplasia
Early detection and screening for colorectal neoplasia Robert S. Bresalier Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. The University of Texas. MD Anderson Cancer Center. Houston, Texas U.S.A.
More informationR. J. L. F. Loffeld, 1 P. E. P. Dekkers, 2 and M. Flens Introduction
ISRN Gastroenterology Volume 213, Article ID 87138, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/1.1155/213/87138 Research Article The Incidence of Colorectal Cancer Is Decreasing in the Older Age Cohorts in the Zaanstreek
More informationImproving you ADR. Robert Enns Colonoscopy Education Day October 2018
Improving you ADR Robert Enns Colonoscopy Education Day October 2018 ADR Applying to CSP Assume 50% ADR in FIT positive patients Out of 40 patients only 20 will have polyps Out of 20 likely 15 will be
More informationThe New Grade A: USPSTF Updated Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines, What does it all mean?
The New Grade A: USPSTF Updated Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines, What does it all mean? Robert A. Smith, PhD Cancer Control, Department of Prevention and Early Detection American Cancer Society
More informationRisk Factors for Incomplete Polyp Resection during Colonoscopic Polypectomy
Gut and Liver, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2015, pp. 66-72 ORiginal Article Risk Factors for Incomplete Polyp Resection during Colonoscopic Polypectomy Sang Pyo Lee, In-Kyung Sung, Jeong Hwan Kim, Sun-Young
More informationFinding and Removing Difficult Polyps (safely)
Finding and Removing Difficult Polyps (safely) David Lieberman MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Oregon Health and Science University Colonoscopy Clouds Interval Cancers Interval Cancer:
More informationColon Polyps: Detection, Inspection and Characteristics
Colon Polyps: Detection, Inspection and Characteristics Stephen Kim, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Interventional Endoscopy Services UCLA Division of Digestive Diseases September 29, 2018 1 Disclosures
More informationColorectal Cancer Screening: Cost-Effectiveness and Adverse events October, 2005
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Cost-Effectiveness and Adverse events October, 2005 David Lieberman MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology Oregon Health and Science University Portland VAMC Portland, Oregon
More informationTips to Improve ADRs during Colonoscopy
Tips to Improve ADRs during Colonoscopy Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH, FACG GI Section Chief, Minneapolis VAMC Associate Professor, University of Minnesota Outline Why is quality important? Fundamentals of high-quality
More informationGI Quality Improvement Consortium, Ltd. (GIQuIC) QCDR Non-PQRS Measure Specifications
GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Ltd. (GIQuIC) 1 Following is an overview of the clinical quality measures in GIQuIC that can be reported to CMS for the Physician Quality Report System (PQRS) via GIQuIC
More informationColonoscopy Quality Assessment
Colonoscopy Quality Assessment Nabil F. Fayad 1, 2, Charles J. Kahi 1, 2 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
More informationThe Importance of Complete Colonoscopy and Exploration of the Cecal Region
The Importance of Complete Colonoscopy and Exploration of the Cecal Region Kuangi Fu, Takahiro Fujii, Takahisa Matsuda, and Yutaka Saito 2 2.1 The Importance of a Complete Colonoscopy Ever since case-control
More informationCT colonography: Patient's tolerance of faecal tagging regimen vs cathartic cleansing
CT colonography: Patient's tolerance of faecal tagging regimen vs cathartic cleansing Poster No.: B-502 Congress: ECR 2010 Type: Scientific Paper Topic: GI Tract Authors: D. Buccicardi, M. Grosso, I. Caviglia,
More informationJoint Session with ACOFP and Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA): Cancer Screening: Consensus & Controversies. Ashish Sangal, M.D.
Joint Session with ACOFP and Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA): Cancer Screening: Consensus & Controversies Ashish Sangal, M.D. Cancer Screening: Consensus & Controversies Ashish Sangal, MD Director,
More informationRisk Factors for Recurrent High-Risk Polyps after the Removal of High-Risk Polyps at Initial Colonoscopy
Original Article Yonsei Med J 2015 Nov;56(6):1559-1565 pissn: 0513-5796 eissn: 1976-2437 Risk Factors for Recurrent High-Risk Polyps after the Removal of High-Risk Polyps at Initial Colonoscopy Hui Won
More informationQuality in Endoscopy: Can We Do Better?
Quality in Endoscopy: Can We Do Better? Erik Rahimi, MD Assistant Professor Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition UT Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School Ertan Digestive
More informationDevices To Improve Colon Polyp Detection
Devices To Improve Colon Polyp Detection ACG/VGS Regional Postgraduate Course Sep 10-11, 2016 Williamsburg, VA VIVEK KAUL, MD, FACG Segal-Watson Professor of Medicine Chief, Division of Gastroenterology
More informationCT Colonography versus Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia
T h e n e w e ng l a nd j o u r na l o f m e dic i n e original article CT Colonography versus Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia David H. Kim, M.D., Perry J. Pickhardt, M.D., Andrew J.
More informationEXPERT WORKING GROUP Surveillance after neoplasia removal. Meeting Chicago, May 5th 2017 Chair: Rodrigo Jover Uri Ladabaum
EXPERT WORKING GROUP Surveillance after neoplasia removal Meeting Chicago, May 5th 2017 Chair: Rodrigo Jover Uri Ladabaum AIM To improve the quality of the evidences we have regarding post- polypectomy
More informationUvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum Hazewinkel, Y. Link to publication
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum Hazewinkel, Y. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hazewinkel, Y. (2014). Serrated polyps of the colon
More informationPage 1 of 8 Performing your original search, incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy, meta analysis, in PMC will retrieve 161 records. Gut Liver. 2015 Jan; 9(1): 66 72. Published online 2015 Jan
More informationColorectal Cancer Screening: A Clinical Update
11:05 11:45am Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Clinical Update SPEAKER Kevin A. Ghassemi, MD Presenter Disclosure Information The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Kevin A. Ghassemi,
More informationCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY Protocol: GAS021 Effective Date: November 1, 2017 Table of Contents Page COMMERCIAL & MEDICAID COVERAGE RATIONALE... 1 MEDICARE COVERAGE RATIONALE... 2 DESCRIPTION OF
More informationNeoplastic Colon Polyps. Joyce Au SUNY Downstate Grand Rounds, October 18, 2012
Neoplastic Colon Polyps Joyce Au SUNY Downstate Grand Rounds, October 18, 2012 CASE 55M with Hepatitis C, COPD (FEV1=45%), s/p vasectomy, knee surgery Meds: albuterol, flunisolide, mometasone, tiotropium
More informationMeasure #425: Photodocumentation of Cecal Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care
Measure #425: Photodocumentation of Cecal Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY MEASURE TYPE: Process DESCRIPTION: The
More informationMeasure #425: Photodocumentation of Cecal Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care
Measure #425: Photodocumentation of Cecal Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY DESCRIPTION: The rate of screening
More informationFDA-2013-N-0816: Joint Meeting of the Gastroenterology-Urology Panel and the Radiological Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee
September 3, 2013 Margaret Hamburg, M.D. Commissioner Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20852 FDA-2013-N-0816: Joint Meeting of the Gastroenterology-Urology Panel and the Radiological
More informationCRC Risk Factors. U.S. Adherence Rates Cancer Screening. Genetic Model of Colorectal Cancer. Epidemiology and Clinical Consequences of CRC
10:45 11:45 am Guide to Colorectal Cancer Screening SPEAKER Howard Manten M.D. Presenter Disclosure Information The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Howard Manten MD: No financial
More informationRE: United States Preventive Services Task Force Draft Research Plan for Colorectal Cancer Screening
February 5, 2014 Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH Chair United States Preventive Services Task Force 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 RE: United States Preventive Services Task Force Draft Research Plan
More informationMissed Lesions at Endoscopy. Dr Russell Walmsley, MD, FRCP, FRACP Gastroenterologist WDHB Chair Endoscopy Guidance Group for New Zealand
Missed Lesions at Endoscopy Dr Russell Walmsley, MD, FRCP, FRACP Gastroenterologist WDHB Chair Endoscopy Guidance Group for New Zealand Missed Lesions at Endoscopy Is there a problem? With Gastroscopy
More informationQuality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening
REVIEW Clin Endosc 2018;51:50-55 https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.010 Print ISSN 2234-2400 On-line ISSN 2234-2443 Open Access Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening
More informationPolyps Adenomas Lipomas
30 Chapter 2 CT Colonography Chapter 2 Polyps Adenomas Lipomas Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16 Case 17 Case 18 Pseudopolyp Polyp after intravenous administration of
More informationWEO CRC SC Meeting. Barcelona, Spain October 23, 2015
WEO CRC SC Meeting Barcelona, Spain October 23, 2015 Identification of serrated polyposis syndrome in the context of population-based CRC screening programs Evelien Dekker Academic Medical Center Amsterdam,
More informationVirtual Colonoscopy/CT Colonography
Applies to all products administered or underwritten by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and its subsidiary, HMO Louisiana, Inc.(collectively referred to as the Company ), unless otherwise provided
More informationColorectal anatomy in adults at computed tomography colonography: normal distribution and the effect of age, sex, and body mass index
674 Colorectal anatomy in adults at computed tomography colonography: normal distribution and the effect of age, sex, and body mass index Authors M. A. Khashab 1,2, P. J. Pickhardt 3, D. H. Kim 3, D. K.
More informationIEHP UM Subcommittee Approved Authorization Guidelines Colorectal Cancer Screening with Cologuard TM for Medicare Beneficiaries
for Medicare Beneficiaries Policy: Based on our review of the available evidence, the IEHP UM Subcommittee adopts the use of Cologuard TM - a multi-target stool DNA test as a colorectal cancer screening
More informationColonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening Colonoscopy
original article Colonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening Colonoscopy Robert L. Barclay, M.D., Joseph J. Vicari, M.D., Andrea S. Doughty, Ph.D., John F. Johanson, M.D., and
More informationSynchronous and Subsequent Lesions of Serrated Adenomas and Tubular Adenomas of the Colorectum
Tsumura T, et al 1 Synchronous and Subsequent Lesions of Serrated Adenomas and Tubular Adenomas of the Colorectum T. Tsumura a T. Hiyama d S. Tanaka b M. Yoshihara d K. Arihiro c K. Chayama a Departments
More informationMulticenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy results of the CLEVER study
Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy results of the CLEVER study Authors Institutions Vincent K. Dik 1, Ian M. Gralnek 2, 3,4, Ori Segol 3,5, Alain Suissa 3, 6, Tim D. G.
More informationThe New England Journal of Medicine A COMPARISON OF VIRTUAL AND CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY FOR THE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL POLYPS.
A COMPARISON OF VIRTUAL AND CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY FOR THE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL POLYPS HELEN M. FENLON, M.B., DAVID P. NUNES, M.B., PAUL C. SCHROY III, M.D., M.P.H., MATTHEW A. BARISH, M.D., PETER
More informationScreening & Surveillance Guidelines
Chapter 2 Screening & Surveillance Guidelines I. Eligibility Coloradans ages 50 and older (average risk) or under 50 at elevated risk for colon cancer (personal or family history) that meet the following
More informationIncidence and Multiplicities of Adenomatous Polyps in TNM Stage I Colorectal Cancer in Korea
Original Article Journal of the Korean Society of J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2012;28(4):213-218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.213 pissn 2093-7822 eissn 2093-7830 Incidence and Multiplicities of
More informationCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY
MEDICAL POLICY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY Policy Number: 2013T0320M Effective Date: November 1, 2013 Table of Contents COVERAGE RATIONALE... BACKGROUND... CLINICAL EVIDENCE... U.S. FOOD AND DRUG
More informationDouglas K. Rex, MD Indiana University Hospital Indianapolis, IN
Serrated Adenomas: What do they mean and what to do about them? Douglas K. Rex, MD Indiana University Hospital Indianapolis, IN Colorectal Cancer Molecular Basis Pathway Frequency Genes MSI Precursor Speed
More informationEndocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans
Original Article Endocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans Michael D. Baek 1,2, Christian S. Jackson 2, John Lunn 2, Chris Nguyen 1,2, Nicole
More informationGuidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer David A. Lieberman, 1 Douglas K. Rex, 2 Sidney J. Winawer,
More informationImproving the quality of endoscopic polypectomy by introducing a colonoscopy quality assurance program
Alexandria Journal of Medicine (13) 49, 317 322 Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine Alexandria Journal of Medicine www.sciencedirect.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Improving the quality of endoscopic polypectomy
More informationjournal of medicine The new england Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults abstract
The new england journal of medicine established in 1812 december 4, 2003 vol. 349 no. 23 Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults Perry J. Pickhardt,
More informationAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Virtual vs. optical colonoscopy in symptomatic gastroenterology out-patients: the case for virtual imaging followed by targeted diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy
More informationThe New England Journal of Medicine
The New England Journal of Medicine Copyright, 2000, by the Massachusetts Medical Society VOLUME 342 J UNE 15, 2000 NUMBER 24 A COMPARISON OF COLONOSCOPY AND DOUBLE-CONTRAST FOR SURVEILLANCE AFTER POLYPECTOMY
More informationRomanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2006, 47(3):
Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 26, 7(3):239 23 ORIGINAL PAPER Predictive parameters for advanced neoplastic adenomas and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic polyps a study in a tertiary
More informationMedical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
Virtual Colonoscopy / CT Colonography Page 1 of 19 Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Title: Virtual Colonoscopy / CT Colonography Professional Institutional
More informationLatest Endoscopic Guidelines for FAP, HNPCC, IBD, and the General Population
Latest Endoscopic Guidelines for FAP, HNPCC, IBD, and the General Population David T. Rubin, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics
More informationTumor Localization for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
World J Surg (2007) 31:1491 1495 DOI 10.1007/s00268-007-9082-7 Tumor Localization for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Yong Beom Cho Æ Woo Yong Lee Æ Hae Ran Yun Æ Won Suk Lee Æ Seong Hyeon Yun Æ Ho-Kyung
More informationColorectal Cancer Screening
Recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer Screening Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, Levin TR, Lieberman D, Robertson
More informationColorectal Cancer: Screening & Surveillance
Objectives Colorectal Cancer: Screening & Surveillance Chanda K. Ho, MD MPH Advances in Internal Medicine Brief overview epidemiology and pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) To review screening modalities
More informationCTC vs. Colonoscopy for Surveillance After CRC? David Weinberg, MD, MSc June 1, 2018
CTC vs. Colonoscopy for Surveillance After CRC? David Weinberg, MD, MSc June 1, 2018 Goals of Post-operative CRC surveillance: Prevention or early detection of metachronous disease 30%-50% will suffer
More information