Comparison of CT and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Blinded Prospective Study
|
|
- Jodie Townsend
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Pieter Poortman 1 Paul N. M. Lohle 2 Cees M. C. Schoemaker 2 Henk J. M. Oostvogel 1 Hans J. L. J. M. Teepen 3 Klaas A. H. Zwinderman 4 Jaap F. Hamming 1 Received December 3, 2002; accepted after revision May 1, Department of Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands. Address correspondence to P. Poortman (p.poortman@elisabeth.nl). 2 Department of Radiology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands. 3 Department of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands. 4 Department of Medical Statistics, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. AJR 2003;181: X/03/ American Roentgen Ray Society Comparison of CT and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Blinded Prospective Study OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of CT and sonography in a general community teaching hospital for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this prospective study, 199 consecutive patients with clinical signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis were examined with sonography (graded compression technique) and CT (focused unenhanced single-detector helical CT [5-mm section thickness]. CT was performed from the L2 vertebral body to the pubic symphysis, and no patients were given oral, rectal, or IV contrast medium. The primary sonographic criterion for diagnosing acute appendicitis was an incompressible appendix with a transverse outer diameter of 6 mm or larger with incompressible periappendicular inflamed fat with or without an appendicolith. The primary CT criterion for diagnosing acute appendicitis was the identification of an appendix with a transverse outer diameter of 6 mm or larger with associated periappendiceal inflammatory changes. The results, independently reported, were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings. RESULTS. One hundred thirty-two patients had acute appendicitis at surgery, and 67 patients did not. The sensitivity of CT and sonography was 76% and 79%, respectively; the specificity was 83% and 78%; the accuracy was 78% and 78%; the positive predictive value was 90% and 87%; and the negative predictive value was 64% and 65%. CONCLUSION. Unenhanced focused single-detector helical CT and graded compression sonography performed in a general community teaching hospital by both body imaging radiologists and general radiology staff members have a similar accuracy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. T raditionally, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mainly based on history, findings at physical examination, and results of laboratory tests. The rate of negative findings for appendicitis at laparotomy or laparoscopy based on these parameters may be as high as 50% [1 3]. On the other hand, a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis may increase the potential risk of a complicated clinical course [4]. For the past two decades investigators have considered CT and sonography to be accurate imaging techniques for detecting acute appendicitis. Helical CT has reported sensitivities of % and specificities of 91 99% [5 19]. Sonography has reported sensitivities of 75 90% and specificities of % [20 23]. Several studies have compared CT and sonography in patients with suspected appendicitis [24 33]. Most of these studies were performed in selected patient groups such as pediatric patients and patients with equivocal clinical signs of acute appendicitis [24, 26, 27, 29 31]. Furthermore, most of the CT and sonography examinations in these studies were performed by body imaging radiologists in university hospitals; only one study was performed in a general community and tertiary care hospital [25]. In a study by Wise et al. [28], radiologists with different degrees of experience evaluated CT scans. This study showed an interobserver variability in the evaluation of the CT scans. The objective of our study was to assess the accuracy of unenhanced focused single-detector helical CT and graded compression sonography in all patients admitted to a general community and teaching hospital with the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis without a selection between typical or atypical clinical signs of acute appendicitis. CT and sonography examinations were performed by both body imaging radiolo- AJR:181, November
2 Poortman et al. gists and general radiology staff members to reflect a realistic clinical setting. Subjects and Methods Between August 1998 and June 2000, all patients who presented to our emergency department with suspected appendicitis were evaluated by a senior surgical resident or a staff surgeon. If the history, physical examination findings, and laboratory test results raised the suspicion of acute appendicitis, patients were asked to participate in this study. The patients were admitted to the hospital either for observation or for surgery. When admitted between 8 am and 10 pm, patients underwent both CT and sonography. When admitted between 10 pm and 8 am, patients with suspected appendicitis were clinically observed and underwent CT and sonography the next morning, because of logistic considerations in the radiology department. Patients who needed to undergo urgent surgery were excluded. In these cases no imaging was performed. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy and claustrophobia. The radiologic procedures and logistics of the study were explained to the patients, and informed consent was obtained from each patient or from a parent in cases of pediatric patients. The hospitalized patients underwent CT and sonography examinations before undergoing surgery or during the first 24 hr of observation. The decision of whether to operate was based on the clinical parameters and laboratory findings. The operation strategy (i.e., laparoscopy or laparotomy) was determined and documented before CT and sonography were performed. CT examinations were performed with a singledetector helical CT scanner (Tomoscan AV, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) by means of a rapid thin-scanning technique. A single breathhold helical scan from the top of the L2 vertebral body to the pubic symphysis was obtained using 5mm beam collimation and 5-mm/sec table speed (pitch of 1, 120 kv, ma). Images were reconstructed and photographed at 3-mm intervals using different soft-tissue window settings (width, 400 H; level, 40 H). In patients younger than 10 years old, the tube current was 100 ma and reconstruction filter 5 was used. In patients between 10 and 15 years old, the tube current was 150 ma and reconstruction filter 5 was used. In patients 15 years or older, the tube current was 250 ma and reconstruction filter 4 was used. No oral, rectal, or IV contrast material was administered. CT scans were analyzed both at a workstation and on hard copy. In this study, CT findings were interpreted as positive for acute appendicitis when an enlarged appendix ( 6 mm in outer diameter) was identified (Fig. 1). Ancillary signs of appendicitis including right lower quadrant inflammation, appendicoliths, and lymphadenopathy were recorded. CT findings were interpreted as negative if the appendix was visualized with intraluminal air. An appendix less than 6 mm in outer diameter was also diagnosed as normal. If an appendix was not visualized and ancillary signs were or were not present, the findings were interpreted as negative. For the sonography examinations, we used 512 MHz linear array, 5-2 MHz curved array, and 8-5 MHz curved array transducers (HDI 3000, ATL Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). Curved array transducers were used in obese patients to allow deeper penetration. Sonography examinations were performed using the graded compression technique described by Puylaert [22]. On sonography, the primary criterion to establish the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was direct visualization of the inflamed appendix: a concentrically layered, small, sausagelike structure found at the point of tenderness. The classic appear- Fig. 1. Unenhanced CT scan of 26-year-old man shows classical appearance of appendicitis with appendicolith, fat stranding, and 11-mm enlarged appendix (asterisk). Dotted line shows enlarged appendix ance is an incompressible appendix with a diameter of 6 mm or larger and echogenic incompressible periappendicular inflamed fat with or without an appendicolith (Fig. 2). The diagnostic criteria for negative findings on sonography were a compressible right lower quadrant without an enlarged appendix, right lower quadrant inflammation, phlegmon, or abscess. The sonography examinations were performed by resident radiologists under the supervision of radiologists. The CT and sonography examinations were performed separately within 1 hr by two radiologists who were unaware of the findings on the other examination. The ratio of the contributions to this study of body imaging radiologists (n = 2) to the other members of the radiology staff (n = 10) was 2:12, which resembles that seen in daily practice. The surgeon was not informed about the radiologic diagnosis. If findings other than appendicitis that had possible clinical consequences were diagnosed on CT or sonography, an independent surgeon was informed. The independent surgeon decided whether the radiologic diagnosis was of consequence for the surgical strategy and whether the operation should be cancelled or the type of operation should be changed (i.e., laparotomy by split-muscle incision or laparoscopy). The diagnosis of acute appendicitis at surgery was established on the basis of macroscopic findings. A macroscopically normal appendix at laparoscopy was left intact. A normal-looking appendix at laparotomy by a split-muscle incision was excised. All excised appendixes were microscopically analyzed by histology using paraffin sections. If no diagnosis could be established during the operation and there was still a strong clinical suspicion of an intraabdominal abnormality, the surgeon had two choices: either consult the radiologist immediately or ask an independent colleague surgeon Fig. 2. Sonogram of 19-year-old man shows acute appendicitis with incompressible 8-mm appendix (asterisk) and echogenic incompressible periappendicular inflamed fat. Dotted line shows enlarged appendix. AJR:181, November 2003
3 CT and Sonography of Acute Appendicitis Correlation of Sonography TABLE 1 and CT in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in 27 Observed Patients Sonography CT Findings Findings Positive Negative Positive 6 2 Negative 4 15 for information about the radiologic diagnosis and consequently determine the operative strategy. Between August 1998 and June 2000, 339 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were hospitalized. One hundred five patients were excluded. Forty-nine patients were admitted after 10 pm and underwent immediate surgery. Eleven patients underwent immediate surgery during daytime hours because they were judged to be too sick for inclusion in the study. Twelve patients refused to take part in the study. In 14 cases the surgeon forgot or refused to include the patient in the study, and 10 patients were not included because of other logistic problems at the radiology department. Nine patients were not included because there was no clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis, contrary to the general practitioner s view. The remaining 234 patients underwent both CT and sonography. In eight patients the radiologist considered it necessary to inform an independent surgeon about the radiologic findings before the operation because of possible significant influence on the surgical management of the patient. In four patients the operation was cancelled because both CT and sonography showed diverticulitis. CT scan showed a teratoma of the right ovary in one patient and an epidermoid cyst of the right ovary in another patient. Both patients were operated on by a gynecologist, and the radiologic findings were confirmed at surgery. In one patient CT and sonography showed acute cholecystitis that resulted in laparoscopy followed by conversion and open cholecystectomy. In one patient the independent surgeon decided to continue laparoscopy, although CT and sonography showed inflammation of the terminal ileum, which is suggestive of terminal ileitis. These radiologic findings were confirmed at laparoscopy. Of the 339 patients considered for inclusion in the study, 226 patients (67%) fully followed the designed protocol. These 226 patients consisted of 125 females and 101 males, ranging in age from 3 to 89 years (mean, 26 years), with six patients younger than 12 years. Most patients (199 [88%]) underwent surgery immediately or within 24 hr of observation after imaging. Twenty-seven patients (12%) were hospitalized for clinical observation after imaging. For this observation group the mean hospital stay was 3 days, ranging from 1 to 7 days. The latter group recovered without surgery during their stay in hospital. The results of CT and sonography in these 27 patients are listed in Table 1. The median followup period was 13 months. One patient was readmitted for a delayed appendectomy that microscopically showed a carcinoid. One patient was readmitted 2 weeks later by a gynecologist for puncture of a 4-cm cyst of the right ovary that was seen on both CT and sonography. All data underwent statistical analysis using the McNemar test. The study protocol was approved by the hospital s ethical committee for human studies. Results At surgery 132 (66%) of the 199 patients proved to have appendicitis, and 67 patients (34%) did not have appendicitis. In 41 (21%) of these 199 patients, another relevant diagnosis was made. In most cases this diagnosis was a gynecologic diagnosis. These diagnoses are listed in Table 2. In the other 26 patients without appendicitis (13%), no diagnosis was made and the appendix was left intact. One of these patients was readmitted 4 months later and proved to have acute appendicitis at laparoscopy. The sonography results for the patients who underwent surgery are listed in Table 3. In 104 (79%) of the 132 patients with appendicitis at surgery, the sonogram showed signs of acute appendicitis. The other 28 patients (21%) appeared to have acute appendicitis at surgery, although the sonogram showed negative findings for appendicitis. TABLE 2 In 52 (78%) of the 67 patients without signs of appendicitis at surgery, sonography also did not reveal appendicitis. In 15 (22%) of the 67 patients, the sonogram showed positive findings for appendicitis, but a normal appendix was found at surgery. In 20 patients the sonogram was assessed to be suboptimal by the performing radiologist because the patient was obese or was experiencing severe abdominal pain or because the appendix was not visible. The CT results for the patients who underwent surgery are listed in Table 4. In 100 (76%) of the 132 patients, CT showed acute appendicitis that was confirmed at surgery. The remaining 32 patients (24%) appeared to have acute appendicitis at surgery, although the CT findings were negative. In 56 (84%) of the 67 patients with a macroscopically normal appendix at surgery, CT findings were negative for appendicitis. In the remaining 11 patients (16%), CT findings were positive. Statistical Data The sensitivity of CT and sonography was 76% and 79%, and the specificity was 83% and 78%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 90% and 87%, and the negative predictive value was 64% and 65%. The accuracy of CT and sonography was 78% Acute Appendicitis: Alternative Diagnoses Made at Surgery in 41 Patients Diagnosis No. of Patients Therapy Gynecologic Ovarian cyst 6 Conservative Corpus luteum 6 Conservative Adnexal teratoma 1 Resection Epidermoid cyst 1 Resection Morgagnian cyst 2 Resection Gynecologic endometriosis or pelvic 6 Conservative inflammatory disease Total gynecologic diagnoses 22 Gastrointestinal diagnoses Diverticulitis 3 Sigmoid resection Crohn s disease 2 Ileocecal resection Infarcted omentum 3 Resection Malignant cecal tumor 3 Hemicolectomy Adhesions 2 Adhesiolysis Cholecystitis 1 Cholecystectomy Meckel s diverticulum 2 Diverticulectomy Duodenal ulcer 1 Conservative Mesenteric adenitis 2 Conservative Total gastrointestinal diagnoses 19 Total diagnoses 41 AJR:181, November
4 Poortman et al. TABLE 3 Correlation of Sonography and Surgery Findings for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in 199 Patients Sonography Findings Surgery Findings No. of Patients Positive Negative Positive Negative Total TABLE 4 Correlation of CT and Surgery Findings for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in 199 Patients CT Findings Surgery Findings No. of Patients Positive Negative Positive Negative Total each. On the basis of the McNemar test results, the calculated p value for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was not less than 0.05, which indicates that CT was not superior to sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Histopathologic Findings During laparoscopy healthy-looking appendixes were not removed. In two of these cases, the patients were readmitted for acute abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant 1 year later. One of these patients underwent laparoscopy, and acute appendicitis was found. Theoretically, a microscopically acute endoappendicitis can be seen by the radiologist and can be erroneously diagnosed by the surgeon as a normal appendix. In three patients microscopic evidence of appendicitis was seen at histology after the surgeon removed a macroscopically normal appendix when performing a split-muscle incision. In one of the three patients CT scans showed appendicitis. In one patient the appendix was microscopically normal, but the surgeon diagnosed an acute appendicitis. In this case, the CT findings also did not suggest appendicitis. Discussion In this blinded prospective study, CT, as interpreted by the radiology staff in a general community teaching hospital, had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value similar to those of sonography. As far as we know, this study is the first blinded prospective study comparing the reliability of CT without administration of any form of enteric contrast material (unenhanced CT) and sonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis in daily practice in an unselected population of patients admitted to a general community teaching hospital with suspected acute appendicitis. Wise et al. [28] also performed a comparative assessment of sonography and CT with enteric contrast material to assess acute appendicitis in an unselected group of patients in a university hospital with radiologists with a broad range of experience. Besides showing that CT significantly outperformed sonography, that study showed an interobserver variability in the evaluation of CT scans. For the continuous effort to reduce the incidence of perforation and negative findings at appendectomy or laparoscopy, CT and sonography are potentially beneficial in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. During the past years, graded compression sonography of the right lower quadrant has gained increasing acknowledgment in establishing the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sensitivities ranging from 77% to 89% and specificities ranging from 94% to 96% [20 23]. The sensitivity and specificity of sonography found in our study confirm these results. Sonography is relatively inexpensive, rapid, is noninvasive, and requires no patient preparation or contrast material administration. Unfortunately, graded compression sonography is operator-dependent and requires a high level of skill and expertise. Sonography is also a dynamic investigation, and photographs of sonographic images cannot be reliably reevaluated. Another important limitation of sonography is that the sensitivity and specificity for perforated appendicitis are lower than for nonperforated appendicitis [34]. Obese patients and patients with a retrocecal appendix or with severe abdominal pain are difficult to examine using sonography [1]. A radiologist in this study also indicated that these patient-related factors limited the diagnostic capability of sonography. Other authors reported that CT is an accurate way of imaging acute appendicitis [5 19]. CT is readily available, is supposed to be operatorindependent, is relatively easy to perform, and has results that are easy to interpret. Helical CT has reported sensitivities of %, specificities of 91 99%, accuracies of 94 98%, positive predictive values of 92 98%, and negative predictive values of % [5 19]. Although oral, rectal, and IV contrast media have been shown to aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, other studies have proven that CT without the administration of contrast material in the setting of suspicion for acute appendicitis can be as accurate as those techniques in which oral, rectal, or IV contrast medium is administered [10, 11, 13, 27, 31]. Therefore, we did not include contrast material administration in our study protocol. Another reason not to administer contrast material was the possibility of patients refusing to enroll in the study to avoid receiving contrast material. With regard to the accuracy of sonography compared with CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, our sonography results are similar to those of other reports [24 33]. However, the accuracy of CT scans analyzed by the general radiology staff in our study proved to be lower (78%) than the accuracy mentioned in other studies [24 33]. In our study, 11 (16%) of the 67 patients were found to have a normal appendix at surgery, but the CT findings were positive for appendicitis. Possible explanations for false-positive CT results are mild appendicitis, resolved appendicitis, or a reactive enlarged appendix caused by mesenteric lymphadenitis. Thirty-two (24%) of the 132 patients had acute appendicitis at surgery, although the CT findings were negative. These false-negative CT results may be also explained by the fact that less experienced radiologists evaluated the CT scans. In our clinical setting, both body imaging radiologists and general radiology staff members evaluated the CT scans. Wise et al. [28] showed an interob AJR:181, November 2003
5 CT and Sonography of Acute Appendicitis server variability in the evaluation of CT scans for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In that study, the range in accuracy for unenhanced focused appendiceal CT was 75 94%. Wilson et al. [25] also discussed the fact that in an academic setting the evaluation of CT scans is often done by a CT radiology specialist. In our study, the results were evaluated by radiologists with a broad range of experience. This setup more closely represents the common clinical setting. The disappointing CT results in this study are more likely to reflect the CT performance in an average hospital. Another reason for the lower accuracy of CT in our study may be the exclusion of the possibility for equivocal test results by forcing the radiologist to make a decision whether or not acute appendicitis was present. In daily practice our surgical staff demands a clear statement by the radiologists. In 41 patients an alternative diagnosis was found at surgery. The cases of diverticulitis, Crohn s disease, cholecystitis, and cecal tumors were detected at both CT and sonography. Of the gynecologic diagnoses, the adnexal teratoma, the epidermoid cyst, and most of the ovarian cysts were seen both on CT and on sonography. A limitation of this study may be that the radiologists were forced to state whether appendicitis was acute. There was no room for indeterminate answers. We also disregarded the impact of the different degrees of experience among the radiologists in analyzing CT and sonography for acute appendicitis. Disregarded also was the body habitus; in obese patients, sonography may be more difficult to interpret than CT, whereas CT may be more difficult to interpret in thin patients. In our opinion, the introduction of CT and sonography as a standard procedure in the workup of acute appendicitis can be worthwhile only if the surgeon can rely fully on CT and sonography performed in the hospital. Concern still exists that the overuse or reliance of radiologic tests may distract from careful and timely clinical evaluation and not add significantly to establishing the diagnosis. How high should accuracy of CT and sonography in acute appendicitis be to convince the surgeon not to operate? If a small risk of a perforated acute appendicitis is still present even when both CT and sonography show a normal appendix, most surgeons will neglect the benefits of these additional radiologic tools. Wilson et al. [25] were the first to design a prospective study to determine whether CT and sonography affect a surgeon s decisionmaking process in acute appendicitis. We believe that further prospective studies are needed to offer a diagnostic pathway in which sonography, CT, and observation can be valuable tools in managing acute appendicitis. In conclusion, CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in both typical and atypical patients analyzed by the general radiology staff of a general community teaching hospital has an accuracy similar to that of sonography. References 1. Birnbaum B, Wilson S. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215: Pieper R, Kager L, Nasman P. Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 cases of emergency appendectomy. Acta Chir Scand 1982;148: Borgstein PJ, Eijsbouts QAJ, De Jong D, Gordijn RV, Cuesta MA. Acute appendicitis: a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women a prospective study on the role of laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1997;11: Eldar S, Nash E, Sabo E, et al. Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 1997;173: Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 2001;220: Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ. Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR 1997;169: Funaki B, Grosskreutz SR, Funaki CN. Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital. AJR 1998;171: Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997;202: Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998;338: Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR 1993;160: Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR 1997; 168: Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Siegel SE, Birnbaum BA. Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high resolution CT. Radiology 1991;180: Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 1999;213: Pickuth D, Spielmann RP. Unenhanced spiral CT for evaluating acute appendicitis in daily routine: a prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48: Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR 2002;178: Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J. The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2000;180: Wijetunga K, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither GW, Doust BD. Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. Radiology 2001;221: Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21: Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA, et al. The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 1999;178: Abu-Yousef MM, Bleicher JJ, Maher JW, Urdaneta LF, Franken EA Jr, Metcalf AM. High-resolution sonography of acute appendicitis. AJR 1987;19: Puylaert JBCM, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, et al. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 1987;317: Puylaert JBCM. US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;158: Franke C, Bohner H, Yang Q, Ohmann C, Roher H. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. World J Surg 1999;23: Balthazar E, Birnbaum B, Yee J, Megibow A, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;190: Wilson EB, Cole JC, Nipper ML, Cooney DR, Smith RW. Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001;136: Pickuth D, Heywang-Kobrunner H, Spielmann RP. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique? Eur J Surg 2000;166: Horton M, Counter SF, Florence MG, Hart MJ. A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. Am J Surg 2000;179: Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR 2001;176: Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Stallion A, et al. Imaging evaluation of suspected appendicitis in a pediatric population: effectiveness of sonography versus CT. AJR 2000;175: Kaiser S, Frenckner B, Jorulf HK. Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT a prospective randomized study. Radiology 2002;223: Lowe LH, Penney MW, Stein SM, et al. Unenhanced limited CT of the abdomen in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: comparison with sonography. AJR 2001;176: Birnbaum BA, Jeffrey RB Jr. CT and sonographic evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain. AJR 1998;170: Styrud J, Josephson T, Eriksson S. Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12: Borushok KF, Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Sonographic diagnosis of perforation in patients with acute appendicitis. AJR 1990;154: AJR:181, November
Unenhanced Limited CT of the Abdomen in the Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children: Comparison with Sonography
Lisa H. Lowe 1 Michael W. Penney 1 Sharon M. Stein 1 Richard M. Heller 1 Wallace W. Neblett 2 Yu Shyr 3 Marta Hernanz-Schulman 1 Received December 16, 1999; accepted after revision May 22, 2000. 1 Department
More informationAlvarado scores and pain onset in relation to multislice CT findings in acute appendicitis
Diagn Interv Radiol 2008; 14:14-18 Turkish Society of Radiology 2008 ABDOMINAL IMAGING ORIGINAL ARTICLE Alvarado scores and pain onset in relation to multislice CT findings in acute appendicitis Erkan
More informationIntroduction of Appendiceal CT Impact on Negative Appendectomy and Appendiceal
ANNALS OF SURGERY Vol. 229, No. 3, 344-349 1999 ULppinc Willams & Wilins, Inc. Introduction of Appendiceal CT Impact on Negative Appendectomy and Appendiceal Perforation Rates Patrick M. Rao, MD,* James
More informationPitfalls in the CT diagnosis of appendicitis
The British Journal of Radiology, 77 (2004), 792 799 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/95663370 E 2004 The British Institute of Radiology Pictorial review Pitfalls in the CT diagnosis of appendicitis 1 C D LEVINE, 2 O
More informationThe equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population
Emerg Radiol (2010) 17:57 61 DOI 10.1007/s10140-009-0826-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population Emily M. Webb & Zhen J. Wang & Fergus V. Coakley & Liina Poder
More informationThe nontraumatic acute abdomen
CT features of acute appendicitis: pictorial review Marco ntonio Cura, MD The nontraumatic acute abdomen is one of the most common presentations to the emergency room, with appendicitis being one of the
More informationIV and Oral contrast vs. IV contrast alone computed tomography for the visualization of appendix and diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients
IV and Oral contrast vs. IV contrast alone computed tomography for the visualization of appendix and diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients Aman Wadhwani, MD/MSc-Candidate Lancia Guo, MD Erik Saude,
More informationSuspected Appendicitis
The new england journal of medicine clinical practice Suspected Appendicitis Erik K. Paulson, M.D., Matthew F. Kalady, M.D., and Theodore N. Pappas, M.D. This Journal feature begins with a case vignette
More informationAPPENDICITIS AND ITS APPEARANCES ON CT
APPENDICITIS AND ITS APPEARANCES ON CT APPENDICITIS Results from acute inflammation of the appendix. Most common abdominal surgical emergencies. Diagnosis usually clinical based on physical exam and lab
More informationMultidetector row helical CT and US in diagnosing appendicitis
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (2011) 42, 139 145 Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrnm
More informationelical CT plays an important role
bdominal Imaging Yu et al. Helical CT of cute RLQ Pain Pictorial Essay Jinxing Yu 1 nn S. Fulcher Mary nn Turner Robert. Halvorsen Yu J, Fulcher S, Turner M, Halvorsen R Helical CT Evaluation of cute Right
More informationThe accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
American Journal of Emergency Medicine (2010) 28, 766 770 www.elsevier.com/locate/ajem Original Contribution The accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
More informationImproving Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Results of a Diagnostic Pathway
Improving Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Results of a Diagnostic Pathway 7 I prefer to exclude acute appendicitis in patients on CT rather at laparoscopy. Equally important - for surgeons who take emergency
More informationDownloaded from tumj.tums.ac.ir at 22:15 IRST on Saturday March 9th :
23 23-30 1386 12 65. : 1 :... 66 64 1 :.. %2/3 %2/86 %2/2. %23/4 %72/7 %13/2 :. %75/7 %0 %73/2... :. 1 1384 1382 ) (. 1 1 *1 2 ٣-1 -2 * 88002651 : email: fkhodadadi@razi.tums.ac.ir. 1-5.. 6 7 8. 1386 12
More informationInvestigating the Impact of the Amount of Contrast Material used in Abdominal CT Examinations Regarding the Diagnosis of Appendicolith
Research Article Investigating the Impact of the Amount of Contrast Material used in Abdominal CT Examinations Regarding the Diagnosis of Appendicolith Eleftherios Lavdas 1,2, Nadia Boci 2, Lia Sarantaenna
More informationAcute appendicitis is one of the most common causes
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2002;123:992 998 Appendicitis: Should Diagnostic Imaging Be Performed if the Clinical Presentation Is Highly Suggestive of the Disease? THOMAS RETTENBACHER,* ALOIS HOLLERWEGER, NORBERT
More informationUS examination of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: The additional value of secondary signs.
3 US examination of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: The additional value of secondary signs. Fraukje Wiersma Boudewijn R. Toorenvliet Johan L. Bloem Jan Hein Allema Herma C. Holscher
More informationINTRALUMINAL GAS IN NON-PERFORATED ACUTE APPENDICITIS: A predictor of gangrenous appendicitis
INTRALUMINAL GAS IN NON-PERFORATED ACUTE APPENDICITIS: A predictor of gangrenous appendicitis DM Plata Ariza, MD; E Martínez Chamorro, MD; D Castaño Pardo, MD; M Arroyo López, MD; E Peghini Gavilanes,
More informationEvaluation of the of the sensitivity, accuracy and positive predictive value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Appendicitis.
West African Journal of Ultrasound Vol 17 Number 2 (2016) Evaluation of the of the sensitivity, accuracy and positive predictive value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Appendicitis. 1 2 3 Oguntola
More informationEvaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis
Eur Radiol (2009) 19: 446 454 DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1164-x COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY Alexandra Platon Helmi Jlassi Olivier T. Rutschmann Christoph D. Becker Francis R. Verdun Pascal Gervaz Pierre-Alexandre
More informationFocused Abdominal Computed Tomography in Clinically Suspected Adolescent Acute Appendicitis
Original Article J Curr Surg. 2018;8(1-2):7-12 Focused Abdominal Computed Tomography in Clinically Suspected Adolescent Acute Appendicitis Muhammad Imran Aslam a, Muhammad Osman Karim b, d, Syed Hussain
More informationRight Colon, Sigmoid Colon, and Transverse Colon Diverticulitis in the Same Patient: Report of a Case
Right Colon, Sigmoid Colon, and Transverse Colon Diverticulitis in the Same Patient: Report of a Case Marc Greenwald, M.D., Tzvi Nussbaum, M.D. Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery,
More informationOperator-Dependent Techniques for Graded Compression Sonography to Detect the Appendix and Diagnose Acute Appendicitis
Gastrointestinal Imaging Lee et al. Operator-Dependent Techniques for Sonography of the ppendix Jong Hwa Lee 1 Yoong Ki Jeong Kwang o Park Ji Kang Park e Kyoung Jeong Jae Cheol Hwang Lee JH, Jeong YK,
More informationAmerican College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria
American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria Date of origin: 1996 Last review date: 2005 Clinical Condition: Variant 1: Fever, leukocytosis, and classic presentation clinically for appendicitis
More informationIntraluminal gas in non-perforated acute appendicitis: a CT sign of gangrenous appendicitis
Intraluminal gas in non-perforated acute appendicitis: a CT sign of gangrenous appendicitis Poster No.: C-978 Congress: ECR 202 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: D. Plata Ariza, E. MARTINEZ CHAMORRO, J.
More informationComputed Tomography Diagnostic Values of Acute Appendicitis in Different Patient Subgroups
J Radiol Sci 2013; 38: 9-14 Computed Tomography Diagnostic Values of Acute Appendicitis in Different Patient Subgroups Chih-Chen Chang Yon-Cheong Wong Li-Jen Wang Cheng-Hsien Wu Huan-Wu Chen Chen-Chih
More informationFHS Appendicitis US Protocol
FHS Appendicitis US Protocol Reviewed By: Shireen Khan, MD; Sarah Farley, MD; Anna Ellermeier, MD Last Reviewed: May 2018 Contact: (866) 761-4200 **NOTE for all examinations: 1. If documenting possible
More informationUvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Magnetic resonance imaging in acute appendicitis Cobben, L.P.J. Link to publication
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Magnetic resonance imaging in acute appendicitis Cobben, L.P.J. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Cobben, L. P. J. (2009). Magnetic resonance
More informationAPPENDECTOMY IS ONE OF THE
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Has Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis Decreased Over Time? A Population-Based Analysis David R. Flum, MD Arden Morris, MD Thomas Koepsell, MD E. Patchen Dellinger, MD Context Misdiagnosis
More informationAdded Value of Coronal Reformations for Duty Radiologists and for Referring Physicians or Surgeons in the CT Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Added Value of Coronal Reformations for Duty Radiologists and for Referring Physicians or Surgeons in the CT Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Kyoung Ho Lee, MD 1 Young Hoon Kim, MD 1 Seokyung Hahn, PhD
More informationACUTE APPENDICITIS IS THE MOST
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Ultrasonography and Limited Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Appendicitis in Children Barbara M. Garcia Peña, MD Kenneth D. Mandl, MD, MPH Steven J. Kraus, MD
More informationKhanal BR, Ansari MA, Pradhan S Department of Radiology and Imaging, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2008), Vol. 6, No. 1, Issue 21, 70-74 Original Article Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Khanal BR, Ansari MA, Pradhan S Department
More informationSonography in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis
CME Article Sonography in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis Are Negative Sonographic Findings Good Enough? Preeyacha Pacharn, MD, Jun Ying, PhD, Leann E. Linam, MD, Alan S. Brody, MD, Diane S. Babcock,
More informationUS diagnosis of acute appendicitis
US diagnosis of acute appendicitis Poster No.: C-1496 Congress: ECR 2010 Type: Scientific Exhibit Topic: GI Tract Authors: A. Gligorievski; Skopje/MK Keywords: Ultrasound, Acute appendicitis, Diagnosis
More informationUS examination of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs
Eur Radiol (2009) 19: 455 461 DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1176-6 PE DIATRI C Fraukje Wiersma Boudewijn R. Toorenvliet Johan L. Bloem Jan Hein Allema Herma C. Holscher US examination of the appendix in children
More informationSummary and conclusions
Summary and conclusions 7 Chapter 7 68 Summary and conclusions Chapter 1 provides a general introduction to this thesis focused on the use of ultrasound (US) in children with abdominal problems. The literature
More informationPAPER. Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Appendicitis
Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Appendicitis When Are They Indicated? PAPER Erik B. Wilson, MD; J. Christopher Cole, MD; Michael L. Nipper, MD; Donald R. Cooney, MD; Randall
More informationACUTE ABDOMEN IN OLDER CHILDREN. Carlos J. Sivit M.D.
ACUTE ABDOMEN IN OLDER CHILDREN Carlos J. Sivit M.D. ACUTE ABDOMEN Clinical condition characterized by severe abdominal pain developing over several hours ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN Common childhood complaint
More informationAppendicitis: When Simple Becomes not so Simple
Wright State University CORE Scholar Department of Surgery Faculty Publications Surgery 1-26-2010 Appendicitis: When Simple Becomes not so Simple Elizabeth H. Ey Wright State University, elizabeth.ey@wright.edu
More informationCT Evaluation of Appendicitis and Its Complications: Imaging Techniques and Key Diagnostic Findings
Pinto Leite et al. CT of Appendicitis Abdominal Imaging Review Nuno Pinto Leite 1 José M. Pereira 1 Rui Cunha 1 Pedro Pinto 1,2 Claude Sirlin 1,3 Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R, Pinto P, Sirlin C Received
More informationAcute Diverticulitis of the Cecum and Ascending Colon: The Value of Thin-Section Helical CT Findings in Excluding Colonic Carcinoma
Hyun-Jung Jang 1 Hyo K. Lim Soon Jin Lee Won Jae Lee Eung Yeop Kim Seung Hoon Kim Received August 17, 1999; accepted after revision October 12, 1999. 1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical
More informationDiagnosis of Acute Appendicitis - Historical Review
Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis - Historical Review 2 The ultimate criterion for the usefulness of a diagnostic test is whether it adds information beyond that otherwise available, and whether this information
More informationThe Questionable Utility of Oral Contrast for the Patient with Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
The Questionable Utility of Oral Contrast for the Patient with Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department Jonathan Rakofsky, MD PGY3 Henry Ford Hospital Emergency Medicine Program December 2014 All patients
More informationNote: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, cont
Note: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, contact us at www.rsna.org/rsnarights. ORIGINAL RESEARCH
More informationInternational Journal of Surgery
International Journal of Surgery 7 (2009) 451 455 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Surgery journal homepage: www.theijs.com Evaluating routine diagnostic imaging in acute
More informationUvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain van Randen, A.; Laméris, W.; Nio, C.Y.; Spijkerboer, A.M.; Meier, M.A.;
More informationAppendicitis Ultrasound: Comparison Study of the Radiology Resident to the Technologist and Attending
Research Article imedpub Journals http://www.imedpub.com Journal of Pediatric Care ISSN 2471-805X DOI: 10.21767/2471-805X.100011 Abstract Appendicitis Ultrasound: Comparison Study of the Radiology Resident
More informationIntegration of ultrasound findings with Alvarado score in children with suspected appendicitis
bs_bs_banner Pediatrics International (2014) 56, 95 99 doi: 10.1111/ped.12197 Original Article Integration of ultrasound findings with in children with suspected appendicitis Huseyin Toprak, 1 Huseyin
More informationDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. ABSTRACT
OriginalArticle Computed Tomographic Findings in Differentiating between Diverticulitis and Colon Cancer Aphinya Charoensak, M.D., Marayart Tongintarach, M.D., Nithida Na Songkhla, M.D. Department of Radiology,
More informationMRI pediatric appendicitis
Disclosures MRI pediatric appendicitis Brooke Lampl Cleveland Clinic Imaging Institute Section of Pediatric Radiology I have nothing to disclose. Objectives Discuss imaging choices in the evaluation of
More informationA Comparative Ultrasound and Plain Abdominal X-Ray: Evaluation of Non-Classical Clinical Cases of Appendicitis
A Comparative Ultrasound and Plain Abdominal X-Ray: Evaluation of Non-Classical Clinical Cases of Appendicitis Dorothy Makanjuola, FRCR; Qasim Al-Qasabi, FRCS; Tajuddin Malabarey, FRCR From the Departments
More informationOriginal article A Prospective Study of Christian Scoring System and its Co- Relation with Ultrasound in diagnosing Acute Appendicitis
Original article A Prospective Study of Christian Scoring System and its Co- Relation with Ultrasound in diagnosing Acute Appendicitis Abhinandan. B. Vandakudri*, Sanjay N Koppad*, Arunkumar. Jeedi,*,
More informationMimics of Appendicitis: Alternative Nonsurgical Diagnoses with Sonography and CT
van reda Vriesman and Puylaert Mimics of ppendicitis bdominal Imaging Pictorial Essay Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 46.3.193.220 on 12/27/17 from IP address 46.3.193.220. Copyright RRS. For personal
More informationAdvances in Emergency Imaging
Hampton Symposium,, October 16 th, 2010 Advances in Emergency Imaging Robert A. Novelline, MD Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School Director of Emergency Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital
More informationThe Value of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis
The Value of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis *Dr. Baha'a Mushref Abdulsalam Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Anbar, Anbar, Iraq Received 14/2/2012 Accepted 23/5/2012
More informationIntroduction Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is basically a clinical matter. Many patients present with a typical history and physical examination fin
Modified Clinical Score of Acute Appendicitis Surgical Department College Of Medicine Karballa University. Abstract B ackground Suspected acute appendicitis is the most common non traumatic admissions
More informationTransvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 496 501 Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Blackwell Science, Ltd P. MOLANDER*, J. PAAVONEN*, J. SJÖBERG*, L. SAVELLI* and B. CACCIATORE*
More informationPitfalls in CT diagnosis of appendicitis: Pictorial essay
bs_bs_banner Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 57 (2013) 329 336 RADIOLOGY PICTORIAL ESSAY Pitfalls in CT diagnosis of appendicitis: Pictorial essay Ashkan Shademan and Rafel FR Tappouni
More informationRoutine Ultrasound and Limited Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
World J Surg (2010) 34:2278 2285 DOI 10.1007/s00268-010-0694-y Routine Ultrasound and Limited Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Boudewijn R. Toorenvliet Fraukje Wiersma Rutger
More informationLow diagnostic values of ultrasonography and negative appendectomy: still a major problem in university hospitals
Original Research Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran.Vol. 24, No. 4, February 2011. pp. 200-207 Low diagnostic values of ultrasonography and negative appendectomy: still a major problem in
More informationAntibiotic Therapy Versus Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis
World J Surg (2010) 34:199 209 DOI 10.1007/s00268-009-0343-5 ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC REPORTS AND REVIEWS Antibiotic Therapy Versus Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis Krishna K. Varadhan David
More informationSIMPLE GUIDE FOR SONOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF APPENDICITIS
SIMPLE GUIDE FOR SONOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF APPENDICITIS A Case Study by Dr. Avni K P Skandhan, India (Consultant Radio Diagnosis, Malabar Institute of Medical Science, Malappuram, Kerala) Email: avniskandhan@gmail.com
More informationAppendicitis USG vs CT
Appendicitis USG vs CT Dr Sateesh Kumar Kailasam MBBS Dip EM (RCGP, UK) MRCEM (UK) Group Head Maxcure Group of Hospitals National Treasurer Society for Emergency Medicine India (SEMI) My Talk includes
More informationEvaluation of accuracy of four clinical scores and comparison with ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis
International Surgery Journal Subramaniyan P et al. Int Surg J. 2017 Jun;4(6):1940-1944 http://www.ijsurgery.com pissn 2349-3305 eissn 2349-2902 Original Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20172108
More informationAccuracy of Modified Alvarado Scoring System in Early Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Accuracy of Modified Alvarado Scoring System in Early Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Dr. Tayeb S. Kareem* Dr. Nadya Y. Ahmed** Dr. Star S. Hussein*** ABSTRACT Background and Objectives: Appendicitis is
More informationClinical, Diagnostic, and Operative Correlation of Acute Abdomen
Original Article Print ISSN: 2321-6379 Online ISSN: 2321-595X DOI: 10.17354/ijss/2018/163 Clinical, Diagnostic, and Operative Correlation of Acute Abdomen Madipeddi Venkanna 1, Doolam Srinivas 2, Budida
More informationValue of Contrast Enhanced MDCT in Distinguishing Complicated from Non-Complicated Acute Appendicitis
Med. J. Cairo Univ., Vol. 84, No. 2, September: 91-98, 2016 www.medicaljournalofcairouniversity.net Value of Contrast Enhanced MDCT in Distinguishing Complicated from Non-Complicated Acute Appendicitis
More informationThe role of abdominal X-rays in the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis
Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences Vol. 2(11) pp. 1216-1220, November 2011 Available online@ http://www.interesjournals.org/jmms Copyright 2011 International Research Journals Full Length Research
More informationEvaluation of Ultrasound and Alvarado Score Combination for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Babylon Childrens
September, 2017 2017; Vol1; Issue8 http://iamresearcher.online Evaluation of Ultrasound and Alvarado Score Combination for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Babylon Childrens Ahmed. S. Resheed Pediatric
More informationRole of serum C- reactive protein and leukocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in Nepalese population
Original Article Nepal Med Coll J 2008; 10(1): 11-15 Role of serum C- reactive protein and leukocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in Nepalese population CS Agrawal, 1 S Adhikari 2 and M
More informationAlways keep it in the differential
Acute Appendicitis Lissa C. Sakata and Lindsey Perea 2 Always keep it in the differential Learning Objectives 1. The learner should be able to describe the etiology of acute appendicitis. 2. The learner
More informationEmergency MDCT in case of right lower quadrant pain
Emergency MDCT in case of right lower quadrant pain Poster No.: C-0563 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: M. Lisitskaya, V. Sinitsyn; Moscow/RU Keywords: Abdomen, Emergency, Gastrointestinal
More informationImaging Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain 1
Note: This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, contact us at www.rsna.org/rsnarights. Jaap Stoker, MD Adrienne
More informationIntroduction ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Steve Y. Lee. Bret Coughlin. Jeannette M. Wolfe. Joseph Polino. Fidela S. Blank. Howard A.
Emerg Radiol (2006) 12: 150 157 DOI 10.1007/s10140-006-0474-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Steve Y. Lee. Bret Coughlin. Jeannette M. Wolfe. Joseph Polino. Fidela S. Blank. Howard A. Smithline Prospective comparison
More informationTo Evaluate the Efficacy of Alvarado Score and Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-issn: 2279-853, p-issn: 2279-861.Volume 15, Issue 9 Ver. XI (September). 16), PP 14-18 www.iosrjournals.org To Evaluate the Efficacy of Alvarado
More informationAcute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in
FEATURE Is It Safe to Delay Appendectomy in Adults With Acute Appendicitis? Michael F. Ditillo, DO,* James D. Dziura, PhD, and Reuven Rabinovici, MD* Objective: To examine whether delayed surgical intervention
More informationAdult Intussusception
Bahrain Medical Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 3, September 2005 Adult Intussusception Suhair Alsaad, MBCHB, CABS, FRCSI* Mariam Al-Muftah, MBCHB** Objectives: Adult intussusception is a rare entity. We present
More informationSigmoid Diverticulitis: Value of Transrectal Sonography in Addition to Transabdominal Sonography
lois Hollerweger 1 Thomas Rettenbacher 1 Peter Macheiner 1 Walter Brunner 2 Norbert Gritzmann 1 Received ugust 17, 1999; accepted after revision March 17, 2000. 1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine,
More informationGASTROINTESTINAL. Eur Radiol (2015) 25: DOI /s
Eur Radiol (2015) 25:2445 2452 DOI 10.1007/s00330-015-3648-9 GASTROINTESTINAL Comparison of Imaging Strategies with Conditional versus Immediate Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in Patients with Clinical
More informationCritical Review Form Clinical Decision Analysis
Critical Review Form Clinical Decision Analysis An Interdisciplinary Initiative to Reduce Radiation Exposure: Evaluation of Appendicitis in a Pediatric Emergency Department with Clinical Assessment Supported
More informationAbdominal Pain in Pediatric Patients Image Gently
Abdominal Pain in Pediatric Patients Image Gently Susan D. John, M.D. Baptist Health Emergency Radiology 2017 Disclosure I have no financial relationships with a commercial entity producing healthcarerelated
More informationGeneral Surgery Service
General Surgery Service Patient Care Goals and Objectives Stomach/Duodenum and Bariatric assessed for a) Obesity surgery b) Treatment of i) Adenocarcinoma of the stomach ii) GIST iii) Carcinoid 2) Optimize
More informationAndrzej Żyluk 1, Paweł Ostrowski 2
POLSKI PRZEGLĄD CHIRURGICZNY 2011, 83, 3, 135 143 10.2478/v10035-011-0021-9 An analysis of factors influencing accuracy of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Andrzej Żyluk 1, Paweł Ostrowski 2 Department
More informationWe are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,900 116,000 120M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our
More informationSonographic Appearance of Normal Appendix in Children. Abstract
Proceeding S.Z.P.G.M.I. vol: 22(2): pp. 57-62, 2008. Sonographic Appearance of Normal Appendix in Children Abdus Sarni Qazi Department of Radiology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore. Abstract Objective:
More informationComputed Tomography (CT) Findings of a Diagnostic Dilemma: Atypically Located Acute Appendicitis
Signature: Pol J Radiol, 2016; 81: 583-588 DOI: 10.12659/PJR.898880 CASE REPORT Received: 2016.04.04 Accepted: 2016.05.06 Published: 2016.12.04 Authors Contribution: A Study Design B Data Collection C
More informationOutcome of Elderly Patients With Appendicitis
PAPER Outcome of Elderly Patients With Appendicitis Effect of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Thomas T. Hui, MD; Kevin M. Major, MD; Itzhak Avital, MD; Jonathan R. Hiatt, MD; Daniel R. Margulies, MD
More informationMedical application of transabdominal ultrasound in gastrointestinal diseases
Medical application of transabdominal ultrasound in gastrointestinal diseases Hsiu-Po Wang Department of Emergency Medicine National Taiwan University Hospital Real-time ultrasound has become a standard
More informationMRI vs. Ultrasound for Suspected Appendicitis During Pregnancy
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 28:428 433 (2008) Original Research MRI vs. Ultrasound for Suspected Appendicitis During Pregnancy Gary M. Israel, MD, 1 * Nagina Malguria, MD, 1 Shirley McCarthy,
More informationNonoperative Treatment With Antibiotics Versus Surgery for Acute Nonperforated Appendicitis in Children. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Nonoperative Treatment With Antibiotics Versus Surgery for Acute Nonperforated Appendicitis in Children A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Jan F. Svensson, MD, Barbora Patkova,
More informationEndometriosis of the Appendix Resulting in Perforated Appendicitis
27 Endometriosis of the Appendix Resulting in Perforated Appendicitis Toru Hasegawa a Koichi Yoshida b Kazuhiro Matsui c a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama,
More informationSmall Bowel and Colon Surgery
Small Bowel and Colon Surgery Why Do I Need a Small Bowel Resection? A variety of conditions can damage your small bowel. In severe cases, your doctor may recommend removing part of your small bowel. Conditions
More informationUltrasonography of the acute abdomen: gastrointestinal conditions
Radiol Clin N Am 41 (2003) 1227 1242 Ultrasonography of the acute abdomen: gastrointestinal conditions Julien B.C.M. Puylaert, PhD, MD Department of Radiology, MCH Westeinde Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
More informationThe Negative Appendectomy Rate: Who Benefits From Preoperative CT?
Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research Webb et al. Preoperative CT and Negative Appendectomy Rates Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research Emily M. Webb 1 Alexander Nguyen Zhen J. Wang Joseph W.
More informationSocietà Medico Chirurgica di Ferrara 12 maggio Malattia diverticolare del colon. La TC in faseacuta
Società Medico Chirurgica di Ferrara 12 maggio 2012 La TC in faseacuta Pier Marco Cervi U.O. Radiodiagnostica Ospedaliera Direttore Dott. Stefano Bighi Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna di Ferrara
More informationCase Report An Unusual Cause of Right Lower Quadrant Pain: The Caecum Diverticulitis
Case Reports in Surgery Volume 2012, Article ID 789397, 4 pages doi:10.1155/2012/789397 Case Report An Unusual Cause of Right Lower Quadrant Pain: The Caecum Diverticulitis Murat Yildar, 1 Omer Faruk Ozkan,
More informationALVARADO SCORE IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS
ALVARADO SCORE IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS *Md. Zikrullah Tamanna 1, Uzma Eram 2, Abdul Muthalib Hussain 3, ShafkatUllahKhateeb 4 and Badurudeen Mahmood Buhary 5 1 Emergency Department, King Fahad
More informationProspective evaluation of clinical, biochemical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children
Original article: Prospective evaluation of clinical, biochemical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children 1 Dr Pervaze Salam, 2 Dr Tariq Ahmed Mala, 3 Dr Firdous Hamid,
More information