Glasgow Child Protection Committee Annual Report Improvement Plan

Transcription

1 Glasgow Child Protection Committee Annual Report Improvement Plan

2 CONTENT Glasgow s Vision / Mission Statement... 3 Preface from Chief Officers... 4 Introduction from the CPC Independent Chair... 5 The Glasgow Context... 6 National Figures for The Glasgow Child Protection Committee... 8 Strategic Planning Continuous Improvement CPC Improvement Plan

3 Glasgow s Vision / Mission Statement Glasgow s children have a right to feel safe and be protected, all services have a responsibility to ensure children are safe and their needs met. Services will work in partnership with children and their families and communities wherever possible to achieve this Glasgow CPC Aims To ensure strategic leadership and ownership of activity in Glasgow to protect children and young people To improve co-operation between agencies in Glasgow in their work to protect children To enhance the development and delivery of services in Glasgow. Parents, carers and families have ultimate responsibility for ensuring that their children s needs are met. We will work with children, young people and their families: to ensure children get the best start in life; highlighting the family s strengths to make them more confident parents or carers; provide assistance and support when needed to improve children and young people s wellbeing and development (Extract from the Interim Children and Young People Services Plan ) 3

4 Preface from Chief Officers The Glasgow Chief Officers Group welcome the opportunity to endorse this report and by so doing to support the significant multi agency activity going on across the city to protect children and support families. The purpose of the report is to both reflect on work undertaken over the last year, and to highlight work in progress or development which will further enhance the city s commitment to protect its children. The independent chair of the Child Protection Committee in his introduction has commented on the changes implemented through legislation which came into effect in April of 2016, which created Glasgow s Health and Social Care Partnership. This is a highly significant structural change, and one of the nine outcomes that the Health & Social Care Partnership are required to deliver on is People using Health and Social Care Services are safe from harm This is an outcome that all partners involved in Public Protection would aspire to, but it is only through strong and effective partnership working that such an outcome can be achieved. In November 2016 Glasgow s Children s Services will be subject to inspection. Although this is a Children s Services Inspection and not a Child Protection inspection, the work of the Child Protection Committee will be subject to scrutiny. This is also at a time when the Scottish Government is progressing its Child Protection Improvement Programme and when the Scottish Historical Abuse Enquiry is considering evidence. Glasgow is well represented on the various work strands of the Child Protection Improvement Programme, and should appropriately influence this work. However, it is in this challenging context that workers in Glasgow are striving to achieve improved outcomes for children in need of protection, and working to identify the best practice which will ensure these outcomes are achieved consistently. The Child Protection Committee Annual Report clarifies the challenges posed, and the ways in which the partners making up the Child Protection Committee are approaching these challenges. The Chief Officers Group both recognises the importance of this work and fully supports it. Annemarie O Donnell Chief Executive 4

5 Introduction from the CPC Independent Chair The Glasgow Child Protection Committee (CPC) has adopted the following vision: Glasgow's children have a right to feel safe and be protected. In Glasgow, all services have a responsibility to ensure children are safe and their needs met. Services will work in partnership with children and their families and communities wherever possible to achieve this. To achieve this vision the committee has determined that they will work: To ensure strategic leadership and ownership of activity in Glasgow to protect children and young people To improve co-operation between agencies in Glasgow in their work to protect children To enhance the development and delivery of services in Glasgow. As Independent Chair I am responsible to the citizens of Glasgow for ensuring that the organisations represented on the Child Protection Committee deliver plans and actions to meet the aspirations represented by our vision. As my predecessor rightly pointed out, it is not the Committee itself that keeps Glasgow s children safe from harm, it is the agencies and organisations represented on the Committee and the practitioners and volunteers in these agencies and organisations who work with children and their families to address their immediate and longer-term needs. We have already discussed the challenges of addressing the scale of children s needs confronting Glasgow at a time when public services are being severely constrained but in April 2015, we saw a significant change in the way Glasgow City plans and delivers health and social care services for all its citizens. This is now done jointly by Glasgow City Council and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC) within a new construct called the Glasgow City Health and Social Care Partnership. Glasgow City Council and NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde have agreed that all community health and social care services, whether provided to adults or children, will be integrated. Health and Social Care Integration arrangements have also presented opportunities for a more coherent approach to public protection. Glasgow s commitment to this approach is reflected in the creation of a new post - Head of Public Protection and Quality Assurance. This change has also resulted in a significant refresh of CPC membership. The Committee saw this change as an opportunity to review its values, vision and how it should conduct its business. A series of development sessions have helped CPC fulfil its commitment to continuous improvement. Central to this has been the dissemination of learning from a number of Significant Case Reviews. This annual report will describe some of our actions and activities over the past two years. More importantly, it will let you know what we intend to do in the future so that we can work towards realising our vision. Colin Anderson Independent Chair 5

6 The Glasgow Context Scotland has a population of 5,373,000, Glasgow s population is 606,340, 11.3% of the national population average. Scotland has a child and young person population of 1,096,768 in the age range 0-18, Glasgow has 116,343,11% of the national figure. Unless otherwise stated demographic information has been drawn from the Interim Children s Services Plan Child Protection data from Social Work Services statistical information for year ending December National data from the National Records of Scotland last updated Demographic population 33% of children are living in poverty 38% of children are living in the 10% most deprived areas 9% of households are lone parents with dependent children 19% of children aged 0-15yrs are from black minority and ethnic background 5,282 children are affected by parental addiction 38,496 children attend primary school; 10,307 require additional support for learning 25,374 young people attend secondary schools; 9,051require additional support for learning 11,190 pupils in Glasgow schools do not have English as their first language There are 119 languages spoken in schools 6,380 eligible and invited to a 30 month assessment Child Protection Figures for Glasgow in 2015/ children were on the Glasgow Child Protection Register (Glasgow SWS data August 2015) 11,355 open Social Care cases for children and young people aged ,505 children and young people looked after away from home 1,919 children looked after at home 1,974 children on a compulsory supervision order 1,269 children and young people in Kinship Care 1,197 children and young people in Foster Care Across Scotland 17.6 per 1,000 children are either looked after or on the Child Protection Register (CPR). Glasgow has the highest with 35.8 per 1,000. In general rates are higher in the West of Scotland and urban areas. 6

7 National Figures for 2015 Number of children on Child Protection Register The number of children on the National Child Protection Register has shown general upward trend from Figures for Glasgow have shown the same upward trend, monthly figures of 513 at August 2015, 513 were the highest recorded in Glasgow. In 2015, 51% of children on the National Child Protection Register were aged under 5, this percentage difference has remained constant since Glasgow figures show there has been a year on year reduction in the percentage of under 5s register with figures for 2015 at 48% ( ) *Glasgow Figures include a pre-birth category Number of Registrations National figures have shown general upward trend in registrations from with a dip in In Glasgow the general trend has also been increased figures. Figures for September 2014 were the highest ever recorded in Glasgow (internal auditors were unable to isolate definitive reasons for the increase). Registration and de-registrations National figures show a year on year increase in both registrations to and de registrations from the child protection register. Glasgow has also shown an increase in de-registrations, however, the trend in registrations has been a reduction in numbers. Annual figures for de registration in Glasgow in 2015 was 711, the majority were de registered because the family significantly reduced risk 63.5%. At National level, the main reason for de-registration is 2015 improved home situation 55% 7

8 The Glasgow Child Protection Committee The Child Protection Committee (CPC) has a unique position within the Glasgow Community Planning Partnership; it is an independent body whose members are drawn from agencies across the City, each member represents an agency whose work impacts on the lives of children and families. The CPC does not directly deliver services, however, on behalf of Chief Officers and Community Planners it monitors the impact of services to ensure the most vulnerable children and young people receive the help they need at the time it is needed. Child Protection Committee Priorities Glasgow CPC has designated neglect and child sexual exploitation as their current priorities because of their impact on vulnerable children and young people. Neglect Neglect is the most prevalent form of child maltreatment in the UK. Neglect can have an impact on all aspects of child development and this impact can last throughout the lifetime. It differs from other forms of abuse because it is frequently passive, it is more likely to be a chronic condition rather than crisis led and often overlaps with other forms of maltreatment. In its extreme form children can be at risk from the effects of malnutrition, lack of nurturing and stimulation. This can lead to serious long term effects such as greater susceptibility to serious childhood illnesses. With young people in particular, the consequences may be life threatening within a very short time. Neglect has been a factor in the majority of Significant Case Reviews held within Glasgow and throughout Scotland. Within Glasgow, neglect is the most frequently used category used when children are placed on the child protection register, it is also the most frequently identified as an additional cause for concern. Glasgow CPC and partner agencies are committed to improving the identification and response across the City, to identify what works to ensure children are protected and their life chances improved. What we have delivered in : Organised 2 multi agency facilitated neglect improvement events Commissioned a Case file review Responding to Neglect in Glasgow Consultations with Professor Brigid Daniel at Stirling University Formation of a neglect working group to coordinate activity Coordinate planning for a Neglect Summit to include Children s and adult services. 8

9 Child Sexual Exploitation Child sexual abuse and exploitation has been a long standing priority for Glasgow City Council services, initially progressed by the Vulnerable Young Persons sub-group and more recently by the Child Sexual Exploitation sub-group. Glasgow has been involved in three large scale CSE police investigations. Each successive investigation provided valuable learning which resulted in improved practice, the development of strong working relationships across partner agencies and an improved understanding of supporting young people who are victims of CSE. As a consequence of the learning, a multi-agency approach to CSE is now adopted at the outset of each investigation. CSE will continue as a priority for Glasgow CPC to consolidate and build on the achievements which have already taken place What we have delivered in : Development of a CSE screening tool The establishment of a CSE working group and terms of reference Joint work with Stirling University to capture the learning from previous investigations The development of a Glasgow work plan which is aligned to the National CSE work plan Glasgow is one of the pilot areas for Stop to Listen; the pilot will develop and promote good practice in working with victims of CSA/CSE Held a CSE Conference in Glasgow for practitioners working with CSE Outcome 2 Children and young people benefit from strategies to minimise harm Extract from CSE Evidence for Inspection: prepared by Moira McKinnon and Glasgow SWS Child Protection Team. Young people themselves do not always recognise that they are victims of abuse and professionals can find this work challenging and frustrating. Young people and their families need to be at the centre of the professional activity and we have to be creative in how we engage young people and deliver services. Secondary schools have been involved in the Mentors for Violence Protection (MVP) programme. This offers young people opportunities to discuss a range of gender-based violence issues within a framework where positive relationships, health and wellbeing are key. The MVP model for violence prevention focuses not on boys/men as perpetrators or potential perpetrators, and girls/women as potential targets of harassment, rape and abuse, but on both as empowered by-standers who can support abused peers and confront abusive ones in a safe and creative way. This is achieved through creating safe and supportive learning environments, empowering young people, challenging bullying and abuse, building relationships and creating partnerships between school and communities. The model aims to create a shift in the culture and ethos within the school on gender based issues. Currently, eight secondary schools are involved in the programme 9

10 Strategic Planning Glasgow CPC have established a series of working sub groups to progress work on its behalf, and to regularly report to the CPC through performance management information. The table below illustrates the structures currently in place. Child Protection Committee Quality Assurance Significant Case Review Vulnerable Children & Young People Child sexual exploitation Communication and Training Neglect Child Protection forums Glasgow Community Planning Partnership delegated responsibility for children s services planning and service delivery to the Children s Services Executive Group (CSEG). CSEG has a membership drawn from senior management and leaders from the principal agencies responsible for the delivery of services for children and young people across the City. CSEG is supported by a cross agency senior management structure. CPC and CSEG have reporting mechanisms in place and some representatives have dual membership. The GIRFEC Board is chaired by the HSCP Head of Strategy for Children s Services, the chair ensures liaison and reporting between the two groups. The inclusion of children s services within the Glasgow City Health and Social Care Partnership has enhanced opportunities for partnership working and provided the stimulus to consider transformational change in all its forms. Transformational change will incorporate how services are delivered, priorities agreed, and the infrastructure in place to facilitate partnership working. The structure in place to deliver children s services is currently under review and will change in accordance with the needs of the HSCP. 10

11 Outcome 3: children and Young people are helped by actions taken in immediate response to concerns The Early Years-Joint Support Teams (EY-JST) are part of the Getting ii Right for Every Child, to deliver early intervention and prevention to families considered Just coping. There are nine EY-JST s operating across the City. The model brings together all of the key local agencies who can contribute to discussion around a just coping family s needs. The purpose of the meeting is to agree an integrated package of support services, based on family need, which will help the family to move towards coping more effectively. Families cannot be referred to the EY-JST without their prior consent, the advantage of the model is working in partnership with families to build resilience. The meeting is jointly chaired by a Social Work Assistant Service Manager and a Team Leader from Health visiting. With other members drawn from the third sector and other relevant agencies. Members have a good understanding of the operational processes within their respective organisations and take requests from the meeting to seek supports. Once an agreed action has been taken by the meeting it is the responsibility of the designated member to ensure that it is carried out. One of the strengths of the model is the presence of the small discrete group at meetings which has proven to be effective because it means there are clear lines of communication and accountability with partner agencies. All referrals remain active until it has been confirmed that services are in place to support the family, with this confirmed in a review meeting. Corporate Parenting The Champions Board provides leadership across the City to the range of organisations who are Corporate Parents and are therefore recognised as having responsibilities for the care and wellbeing of children and young people looked after at home, away from home or in leaving care services. To date the Board has, made corporate training for elected members mandatory, delivered an event led by Who care s Scotland to bring corporate parents together to learn about their roles and responsibilities but more importantly to hear from young people and understand what being looked after is like from a young person s perspective Champions Board members have over a number of years visited children in residential houses to offer assistance to the young people. Young people are also invited to the Champions Board meetings to tell what they thought was good practice and what helped them and what did not. 11

12 Outcome 4: Children and young people s needs are met Young Women s Centre Glasgow has a dedicated Young Women s Centre that provides support to young women who are vulnerable and engaging in high risk behaviours. Functional Family Therapy provides an evidence based systematic intervention to help families. It seeks to work in partnership to improve family functioning and to improve relationships between family members and a reduction in risk. It also seeks to promote parenting skills and outcomes for young people. Non Offence referral management (NORM) provides a multi-agency response to children at risk of abuse in relation to domestic abuse incidents and consequent care and protection issues. The team screen all referrals of domestic abuse to the Police where children have been present. Child Protection concerns are quickly referred to the social work teams. Others require more assessment and visits are made to the family. Advise is given to the families about the impact of domestic violence on the child. Joint visits between Health Visitors and social work are made to ensure the families are supported to ensure the child s welfare needs are being addressed. What we have delivered in A review of CPC membership to shift the balance of representation towards a City wide focus with the emphasis on service delivery and improving links with children s services planning. The appointment of a joint chair independent chair for the Adult Protection and Child Protection Committees. The appointment of the HSCP Head of Public Protection and Quality Assurance as deputy Chair of the CPC. Children get the help they need when they need it The consolidation of Early Years Joint Support Teams (EY JST) across the City to provide support to Just Coping families and prevent escalation to statutory intervention. Establish a neglect working group to revise the City Wide Neglect Action Plan oversee planning of the child and adult services Neglect Summit for CPC Independent Chair and Head of Strategy for Children s Services participation in Child Protection Improvement Programme The implementation of Getting it Right For Every Child 12

13 Continuous Improvement All organisations have a responsibility to continuously monitor and improve how they deliver services, when the services and support are delivered to children and families when they are most in need, it is even more important. Sometimes monitoring improvement involves evaluating how services are delivered and whether there is evidence that interventions have improved outcomes for children and families. Sometimes it means talking to children and families to find out how it feels to be in receipt of services and whether it is a positive experience, and if not why not? Sometimes, unfortunately, things do go wrong particularly when there is more than one organisation involved with the same family; when this happens, part of our continuous improvement programme is implementing the Significant Case Review which is the process in place to investigate what went wrong and make recommendations for improvement to make sure it does not happen again. Self-Evaluation A comprehensive range of single and joint agency reviews, evaluations and audits have taken place within partner agencies since the last annual report. The priority for the CPC has been in the area of Early Intervention and we have been involved in two multi agency self-evaluations, each looking at a different aspect of early intervention The Vulnerable Pregnant Women s Protocol The Protocol can be activated at any point from the initial interview with midwifery to any point before the date of birth. The protocol is implemented when workers identify areas of concern for mother and or child, either because of physical / emotional concerns or social circumstances which indicate the mother has additional vulnerabilities. The primary purpose of the evaluation was to examine whether or not Pre-birth Child Protection procedures were invoked appropriately and evaluate how well they were implemented. The evaluation scrutinised 3 distinct case types in the study, this allowed the researchers to assess the potential links between the intervention and outcome and also shed light on decision making processes. The evaluation concluded that while many aspects of the protocol worked well there were specific areas where practice was not as effective as it could have been and communication between agencies was identified as requiring action. 13

14 What we have delivered in : Work on the protocol has been passed to the Vulnerable Pregnant Women Working group for detailed exploration of the Pathway implemented within the protocol Data obtained from the self- evaluation has been passed to NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde to inform future auditing activity Validated Self-Evaluation Early Years Joint Support Teams were established across the City as part of the One Glasgow Early Years Approach which targets Just Coping families. The JST s rely heavily on third sector support, with intervention co-ordinated around a multi-agency response. Families are referred with their full knowledge and consent, are actively involved in all discussions. Interventions are delivered in partnership with parents and families to improve resilience and prevent escalation into involvement with statutory services. In 2016 the CPC worked in partnership with colleagues in Education, Health and the Third Sector to conduct a Validated Self-Evaluation (VSE). The VSE was led by colleagues in Education and was used to evaluate one of the Early Years JST s supporting families in the South of the City. The evaluation was overwhelmingly positive with Parents in particular observing how supportive and non- judgemental they found their experience, and recommending it to others. What we have delivered in : The final report from the EY JST from South Glasgow will be tabled to the CPC and the QA sub group to assess further roll out A VSE is currently underway in the North East of the City Significant Case Reviews Significant Case Reviews (SCR s) are a critical part of the continuous improvement. The Child Protection Committee is responsible for the implementation of SCR. The CPC reports on SCR s to the Chief Officers Group and to Care inspectorate. Within Glasgow the SCR process is implemented by two multi agency teams, the SCR Review Team and the SCR Panel. The process involves examining all of the evidence relating to the circumstances of the case and evaluating them against best practice and where it is assessed that practice could be improved an action plan detailing the required improvements is developed and disseminated throughout relevant agencies for action. Action taken is reported back to the Child Protection Committee. Within Glasgow CPC there is a formal protocol in place which sets out the roles and responsibilities of everyone involved, how the SCR should be investigated and how reported. 14

15 Over the last 18 months Glasgow has conducted two Significant Case Review, in both cases neglect has been identified as a significant factor. The identification and response to neglect is a priority for Glasgow CPC. What we have delivered in : Drafted an SCR protocol and operational Protocol Formalised the action plan process for addressing learning Outcomes Commissioned an external evaluation of how Glasgow CPC disseminates learning outcomes throughout partner agencies Multi Agency Training The annual multi agency training plan has undergone significant change over the last eighteen months, with the duration of some training reduced to half day courses, the content clearly focussed at the appropriate level for participants, and the frequency of delivery increased. Initial feedback indicates the courses are well received, are evaluating well and attendance has improved. There has been particularly good take up of courses by Education, Residential Care staff and Voluntary Sector agencies however, Social Work, Police and Arm s Length External Organisations (ALEO) are under-represented in course attendance. Courses which continue to be poorly subscribed are being reviewed by the learning and Development Officer and being replaced by courses which provide specific training to improve practice such as training on chronologies and the National Risk Framework. The L&D Officer will coordinate with the Neglect working group and the Child Protection Forums in the development of revised training. The changes which have taken place in the delivery of the training calendar have created opportunities for alternative methods of delivery such as short sessions of 90 minute 2/3 hours duration, delivered within localities to audiences in excess of 30 people. The other advantage is the increased flexibility which means the L&D officer can become more involved in training in partnership with other colleagues and to respond to specific training requests e.g. Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). What we have delivered in : Delivered child protection awareness training to members of the Health Improvement Team in South Glasgow and the North East Health Improvement Initiative Internet safety training to Supported Carers Child Protection training for all staff in ASSIST Three 90 minute multi agency seminars focussing on Female Genital Mutilation delivered in conjunction with colleagues in the Child Protection Team with approximately 100 staff attending Training on Attachment and Neglect delivered to SCRA Presentation outlining the role of the CPC to children s panel members Developed input into the Post Qualifying Award for Independent Domestic Abuse Advisors across Scotland Working in conjunction with the Child Protection Team to roll out Training for Trainers on the Neglect Toolkit 15

16 Public Information and Communication and Collaboration The Glasgow CPC believes that children will be better protected if we work in partnership with each other, professionals, families and communities, furthermore, that effective communication is an essential requirement. The Communications Sub Group Over the last two years the Communications sub group has undergone a significant amount of change, some of these are listed below: The Training Group and the Communications sub group have merged Membership has been reviewed and changed to reflect the different priorities of the group A new work plan which sets out the communications sub group priorities has been agreed A review of the web site has taken place and work to upgrade the content is underway Established links and representation from the Children s Rights Service What we have delivered in All published information leaflets have been updated and circulated to partner agencies Consultation with group members indicated that child protection posters were well received and had proven popular, additional copies were obtained and circulated to all partner agencies. The Child, Teen, Parent and Carer sections of the website have been rewritten to provide clear information for members of the public on child protection processes Two full page child protection adverts were placed in the Glasgow Magazine, which is delivered to every home and business in the City Pocket sizes child protection information cards which had proved popular with pupils and teachers in first and second years secondary schools were reprinted and circulated to all schools. The CPC collaborated with the SWS Child Protection Team and delivered a very successful Child Sexual Exploitation Conference, Shared Learning Through Practice and Experience. The work of the Communications sub group will remain under regular review. The group previously agreed to link the communication activity to other awareness raising initiatives to deliver a coordinated approach to communicating local priorities. 16

17 Targeted communication activity being progressed at the moment includes: The Community Engagement Short life working Group chaired by Police Scotland, and coordinating a body of activity around CSE which includes among other issues, community engagement and engagement with the night time economy. The other initiative being progressed is working in partnership with the Women s Support Project to develop child protection materials for minority ethnic families. The information being considered will include FGM and the role of Child Protection within Scotland and following development will involve consultation and awareness raising with local communities. Communicating with Children A wide range of activity has been taken forward across statutory agencies and third sector partners to communicate with children and young people, some examples have been set out below: The Children s Rights Service (CRS) supported 30 young people to take part in interviews for residential workers and managers in 2015/16 Young people designed the questions and after each interview considered the applicants responses. There are plans to include a young person on the interview panel for future interviews CRS consulted with children and young people on the quality of foster care support they received, responses were based around GIRFEC wellbeing indicators 21 children and young people supported by the CRS team developed and delivered a presentation to Local Management Review meetings across the City. The presentation was called Our Rights, Our Views, Our Voices Two citywide consultations with children and young people aged 5 to 21, the first Understanding GIRFEC the second Know your Rights Social work services use Viewpoint to elicit the views of children and young people of five years and above, at critical points in their engagement with services; including when they become looked after, are included on the child protection register, attend reviews, or if they have a disability A group of parents have been directly involved in the production of an educational DVD on parental addiction and recovery. Work is underway to incorporate the views of children into this film. 17

18 Policies Procedures and Guidance All policies, procedures and guidance developed under the auspices of the CPC are posted on the Glasgow Child Protection Website. they will also be incorporated within the websites of the agencies who developed them. Over the last two years the following materials have been developed. Responding to Neglect in Glasgow - Case File Review Jan 2015 Glasgow Multi Agency guidance for people working with Children and young people at risk of self harm or suicide-may 2015 Multi Agency Assessment and Risk management Protocol for Children and Young People Who Display Sexually Harmful Behaviour (SHB) Jun 2015 Fabricated and Induced Illness in Children Guidance-Mar 2016 Neglect Tool Kit July 2015 Vulnerable Young Persons Procedures (redraft complete to be tabled to Quality Assurance sub group) Outcome 1: Children and young people are listened to, understood and respected To ascertain the health and wellbeing needs of young people in Glasgow, a three-yearly health & wellbeing survey is commissioned by Glasgow Health & Social Care Partnership (HSCP). This survey has been carried out since 2006/7 and gathers a range of data. The survey samples 50% of the secondary school population in Glasgow (over 11,200 pupils in 2014/15), proffering a high level of confidence in the findings. In addition, because young people take part in the survey on an individual basis, the data is reflective of young people s perceptions and experiences. However, the survey is only one part of how we engage young people to elicit their views. As a follow up to the survey, health improvement take the survey back to schools to engage groups of pupils from every secondary school in Glasgow to work with the data/findings and develop youth-focussed ideas/views/solutions to identified health & wellbeing issues. Through this process, the young people take a lead for developing a school summit event in the city. This year, the School Summit took place in Hampden on May 23rd and you can see a short segment from the event here: 18

19 Conclusion The preceding pages summarise some of the activity which has taken place within the CPC, CPC Sub Groups, Children s Services Planning structures and partner organisations over the last two years. There is also included within the report some of the work which has been taken forward and some areas of work we consider achievements. The report also incorporates the CPC priorities for the coming year. Appended at the end of the report is the 2017 Improvement Plan which sets how Glasgow CPC intends to work towards ensuring that children within Glasgow are safe and protected. If you have any questions or would like additional information please contact: address: sw_glasgowcpc@sw.glasgow.gov.uk Website Address: 19

20 CPC Improvement Plan Key Issue Action Lead Status Timescale Finalise children s services planning structures required by HSCP Establish a City Wide working Group to coordinate activity on neglect. Develop a Performance Management Reporting Framework which meets the information needs of CPC Confirm the dissemination action and reporting process which underpin continuous improvement through the learning arising from Significant Case reviews 1. Restructuring of the Children s Services (CS) planning structures to be completed and agreed. 2. Strengthen the communication and planning links between CPC and CS planning 3. CPC to collaborate in the development of the Children s Services Plan Reporting to QA Sub Group 6 weekly and CPC 8 weekly 2. Develop and report on the Neglect Workplan 1. Review the Performance management Reporting Schedule Identify gaps 3. Confirm reporting pathways into QA and CPC 1. Agree process of dissemination 2. Identify named person 3. Agree frequency and method of reporting to QA and CPC Mike Burns/ Lead Officers Group AMManning/Gary Dover/Liz Fourna HSCP children s services planning group Neglect sub group Quality Assurance Sub Group Quality Assurance Sub Group To be consulted on and agreed to reflect priorities of the next children s services plan CPC co-ordinator member of Children s Services Executive Group and the GIRFEC Board CPC minutes circulated to CSEG and Lead Officers Group and CPC a standing item on the agenda CPC Co-ordinator member of planning group and monthly planning meetings in progress QA working group established Draft Workplan circulated for consultation Planning for Neglect Summit under way Reporting schedule to be tabled to the QA Sub group December 2016 to discuss and agree a process for review. Discussion at November CPC to pend dissemination process to the QA Sub Group for drafting a proposal for report back to CPC January 2017 By April 2017 Children s Services Plan to be completed by April 2017 Summit to be delivered February December 2016 QA Sub group 21 December 2016 Report back to CPC 23 January

21 Agree the process and responsibility for locality based multi- agency self - evaluation programme Progress Communications work plan to improve understanding of local and national priorities Develop information and guidance to improve understanding, identification and response to CSE Ensure current policies, procedures and protocols are available on the CPC website 1. Agree the process for coordination and delivery of Multi agency selfevaluation programme 2. Agree reporting process 1. Continue the upgrade of information contained on the CPC website 2. Target Community engagement activity to support local and national priorities 1. Develop and disseminate CSE guidance, information and assessment tool for practitioners 2. Develop information for children, young people, families and communities to promote understanding 1. Review information located on web site to ensure it is current and relevant Quality Assurance Sub group CPC Support Team/ AMManning/ Third sector partners CSE Sub Group CPC Learning and Development Officer and admin team Validated Self-Assessment conducted in Govan EY JST reported to CPC and QA November Further VSE s underway in EY JST North East and planned for South. VSE incorporated within the QA Workplan to consider further use 1. Web site upgrade underway at November Planning meeting for community engagement with third sector November Target priority FGM CSE Working Group currently implementing CSE Work Plan and providing a written report to CPC 6 monthly. CSE consultation event to be delivered January 2017 Development of information and guidance materials included within the work plan Initial review of policies procedures and protocols conducted May Further review will be conducted 2017 as part of the ongoing CPC website review Discuss QA 21 December Dec 2016 meeting of the FGM Strategic Group Consultation event January 2017 February