Building AlLIAnces in Placer County

Transcription

1 Building AlLIAnces in Placer County Presented by the Placer SNAP-Ed Coordinating Council (PSCC) to the 2016 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) Local Implementing Agency (LIA) Forum January 13, 2016

2 SNAP-Ed in Placer County: Past, Present, Future

3 Isolated efforts Territorial Began coordinating efforts Past

4 Drivers Catalysts New Leadership Flexibility in expanding evaluation efforts How are we all making an impact? Dialogue Shared vision within LIAs LIAs present on county work Benefit to our SNAP-Ed clientele Genuine desire for success Support from SIAs

5 Present Regular meetings Need for unifying name: Placer SNAP-Ed Coordinating Council Comradery Developed shared Logic Model and Evaluation Plan

6 Future Use Logic Model to develop multi-year IWP More effectively tell the SNAP-Ed story in Placer County as a whole Continue to expand collaboration

7 Past Present Future

8 Logic Models: a Video Introduction

9

10

11

12

13 EVALUATION MATRIX: Placer SNAP-Ed Coordinating Council (PSCC) Indicators Design Data Collection/Data Sources/Timeframe Increased healthy food access by target population Farmers Markets that accept Archival Data Review Compare baseline of 1 EBT (Lincoln) with numbers at end of FFY16 EBT sales at Farmers Markets Archival Data Review CDSS data reviewed annually Responsible Parties Data Collection: HEC, PHI Analysis and Reporting: Evaluator Data Collection: HEC, PHI Analysis and Reporting: Evaluator # Target population participating in a school or community garden RE-AIM framework Participation logs at gardens updated monthly (see CoRR garden evaluation plan) Interview garden coordinators about participation and changes over time (retrospective at end of FFY 2016) Data Collection: HEC, PHI, UCCE Analysis and Reporting: Evaluator

14 Indicators Design Data Collection/Data Sources/Timeframe Enjoyment of fruits and veggies, healthy beverages, and physical activity Increase in numbers of youth Focus groups (6) 6 Focus groups embedded and adults reporting enjoyment into nutrition education Public intercept survey of healthy eating and physical classes (10-15 min. at final activity Provider survey session) EPA will develop focus group protocol At least 450 surveys administered at farmers markets and other sites and events EPA will develop enjoyment survey Survey 80 nutrition/pa educators (up until 7/31/16) Responsible Parties Data Collection: Focus groups All PSCC Partners (2 each) Surveys HEC, PHI, UCCE Interviews UCCE Retrospective survey of teachers Analysis and Reporting: Evaluator Increased shared resources among PSCC partners Increase in shared tools, time, Group interviews funds, and events Quarterly assessment of shared resources, including tools, time, funds, events (prior to each CNAP meeting) Data Collection: Evaluator Analysis and Reporting: Evaluator

15 Indicators Design Data Collection/Data Sources/Timeframe Responsible Parties Increased reach to eligible populations that have been historically underserved Increased numbers of new, targeted groups engaged (e.g. sites, foster youth, FBOs, veterans, Latinos, schools, seniors, etc.) Document review (site lists, other archival data) PSCC partners submit documents at end of FFY16 ATF data cards ( ) Site lists (2013 compared to 2016) Data Collection: PSCC Partners Analysis and Reporting: Evaluator Increase in community sustainability Increased organizational partners (e.g. CalFRESH, subgrantees, CBOs, child care centers, eligible school sites, etc.) implement internal systems changes to promote healthy eating and physical activity Self-report Quarterly meeting interim reporting Retrospective interviews end of FFY 2016 Data Collection: PSCC Partners Analysis and Reporting: Evaluator

16 PLACER SNAP-ED COORDINATING COUNCIL COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION MEETING INVITED ATTENDEES Kelley Brian UC Cooperative Extension Rosemary Carter UCCE Lisa Tadlock Public Health Institute Courtney Cagle Public Health Institute Marcella Gonsalves Health Education Council Mary Odufuwa Health Education Council Nancy Vasquez Area 4 Agency on Aging Galen Ellis Ellis Planning Associates Liz Matson Ellis Planning Associates Thursday, November 19, am 12pm Cooperative Extension Placer County E Ave, Auburn CA EXPECTED OUTCOMES Information shared on communications, resources, and partners systems changes Members trained on using evaluation data collection instruments AGENDA Arrival, Welcome, and Overview Standing Agenda Items: Communications (presentations locally and SNAP-Ed Forums) Sustainability updates (partners system changes) Assess shared resources Data Collection: Matson Report: update on baseline data, CDSS data, review timing for data collection etc.) Training on instruments: o Focus group protocol o Public Intercept Survey Next Meeting & Closure