Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery
|
|
- Albert Moody
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery Transoral Robotic Glossectomy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Michael Friedman, Craig Hamilton, Christian G. Samuelson, Kanwar Kelley, David Taylor, Kristine Pearson-Chauhan, Alexander Maley, Renwick Taylor and T. K. Venkatesan Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery : 854 originally published online 13 January 2012 DOI: / The online version of this article can be found at: Published by: On behalf of: American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Additional services and information for Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery can be found at: Alerts: Subscriptions: Reprints: Permissions: >> Version of Record - May 1, 2012 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Jan 13, 2012 What is This?
2 434262OTOXXX / Fried man et alotolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2011 The Author(s) 2010 Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav Original Research Sleep Medicine Transoral Robotic Glossectomy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 146(5) American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2012 Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav DOI: / Michael Friedman, MD 1,2, Craig Hamilton, MBChB 2, Christian G. Samuelson, MD 2, Kanwar Kelley, MD, JD 2, David Taylor 2, Kristine Pearson-Chauhan 2, Alexander Maley 1,2, Renwick Taylor 2, and T. K. Venkatesan, MD 1,2 Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article. Abstract Objective. In previous reports of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), patients underwent routine tracheotomy. We aim to assess the feasibility of performing robotically assisted partial glossectomy without tracheotomy and to assess efficacy by comparing OSAHS outcomes with those of established techniques. Study Design. Historical cohort study with planned data collection. Setting. Tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods. Forty consecutive patients underwent TORS for OSAHS between October 2010 and June 2011 and were followed up with regard to complications, morbidity, and subjective and objective outcomes. Data from 27 of these patients who underwent concomitant z-palatoplasty with 6-month follow-up were compared with those of 2 matched cohorts of patients, who underwent either radiofrequency (radiofrequency base-of-tongue reduction [RFBOT]) or coblation (submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision [SMILE]) reduction of the tongue base and z-palatoplasty. Results. No major bleeding or airway complications were observed. Postoperative pain and length of admission were similar between groups. All groups saw Epworth score and snore score improvement. Patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery took longer than their SMILE and RFBOT counterparts to tolerate normal diet and longer than RFBOT patients to resume normal activity. Apnea hypopnea index (AHI) reduction averaged 60.5% ± 24.9% for TORS versus 37.0% ± 51.6% (P =.042) and 32.0% ± 43.3% (P =.012) for SMILE and RFBOT, respectively. Only the robotic group achieved statistically significant improvement in minimum oxygen saturation. Surgical cure rate for TORS (66.7%) was significant compared with RFBOT (20.8%, P =.001) but not compared with SMILE (45.5%, P =.135). Conclusion. Robotically assisted partial glossectomy feasibly can be performed without the need for tracheotomy. This technique resulted in greater AHI reduction but increased morbidity compared with the other techniques studied. Keywords robotic surgery, transoral robotic surgery, glossectomy, obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome, sleep apnea, sleep apnea surgery Received September 4, 2011; revised November 30, 2011; accepted December 7, The base of the tongue is recognized as a significant site of obstruction in many if not most cases of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). 1 Multiple surgical measures aimed at improvement of tongue-base obstruction exist. However, this problem often remains inadequately treated owing to the unpredictable efficacy of the available procedures. These can be broadly classified as 1 of 2 approaches: tongue suspension or tongue reduction. Definitive reduction through traditional transoral midline glossectomy is infrequently performed. Insufficient visualization of 1 Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA 2 Advanced Center for Specialty Care, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA Presented at the 2011 AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting & OTO EXPO; September 11 to 14, 2011; San Francisco, California. Corresponding Author: Michael Friedman, MD, Chicago ENT and Advanced Center for Specialty Care, 30 North Michigan Ave, Suite 1107, Chicago, IL hednnek@aol.com
3 Friedman et al 855 crucial neurovascular structures restricts resection to the midline third of the tongue, ignoring the lateral tongue base. Open approaches through the neck can be performed to improve access, but these have significant associated morbidity. 1 In recent times, reasonable success has been achieved through the use of radiofrequency base-of-tongue reduction (RFBOT) and, latterly, submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision (SMILE) techniques. 1 Technological advances allowing improved access to the tongue base may theoretically allow for more aggressive tissue reduction. Robotically assisted surgery has gained popularity in a number of fields over the past decade. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS), pioneered by O Malley and Weinstein, 2 gained approval by the Food and Drug Administration in December 2009 for use in the treatment of benign and malignant conditions of the mouth, tongue, tonsils, pharynx, and larynx. Proponents of this technique cite improved 3-dimensional visualization and precise multiplanar tissue transection as its major advantages. 2-4 Potential disadvantages include a lack of tactile sensation, difficult hemostasis control in some cases, and high capital cost. To date, reports suggest TORS is well tolerated by patients, with complications related to the specific procedure performed rather than the use of the robot. 5 Vicini et al 3 presented a preliminary report on TORS for tongue-base reduction in OSAHS in Across their 10 patients, a mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduction from 38.3 to 20.6 was achieved. In 2011, a further report by the same group presented outcomes for 20 patients who underwent robotically assisted glossectomy, with AHI, minimum oxygen saturation, and Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) all significantly improved. 4 All patients in these series underwent routine tracheotomy as a precaution prior to TORS, although in the researchers retrospective analysis, they noted no serious problems with bleeding or airway compromise. The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility of performing robotically assisted midline glossectomy without tracheotomy for patients with moderate to severe OSAHS. In assessing the efficacy and associated morbidity of this procedure, we will directly compare outcomes from patients undergoing TORS with those of matched cohorts of patients undergoing radiofrequency treatment (RFBOT) or submucosal coblation (SMILE). We hypothesize that TORS will achieve improved outcomes for OSAHS as a result of the ability to better control the extent of tissue resection. Methods and Materials The standard in tongue-base surgery at our practice has evolved over the past 4 years as new evidence and new techniques have become available. Prior to 2008, RFBOT was the technique of choice for most of our patients. SMILE was then introduced in place of RFBOT from 2008 to Since October 2010, robotically assisted midline glossectomy has been adopted as the standard approach. This study was a retrospective analysis of data extracted from a prospective computerized database. The Advocate Health Care Institutional Review Board gave approval for review of data from all adult patients who presented for base-of-tongue reduction surgery between March 2007 and June 2011 at a single clinical site (Advanced Center for Specialty Care, Chicago, Illinois). Between October 2010 and June 2011, 40 patients underwent robotically assisted midline glossectomy using the davinci surgical robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, California). In all cases, tongue-base reduction was performed in tandem with a surgical or minimally invasive palatal procedure to address multilevel obstruction. For the purposes of this study, to control for the effect of the palatal procedure, only data from patients who underwent modified z-palatoplasty (ZPP) were included. Further inclusion criteria for review were (1) significant symptoms of snoring and/or daytime somnolence, (2) moderate to severe OSAHS confirmed by formal polysomnography (defined as an AHI 15), (3) preoperative and postoperative polysomnography and 6-month postoperative follow-up, (4) Friedman tongue position III or IV, 6 (5) the appearance of obstruction at the level of the soft palate, (6) documented failure/refusal of attempts at conservative treatment measures (including but not limited to continuous positive airway pressure), and (7) adults aged 18 years or older. Exclusion criteria were (1) failure to attend postoperative follow-up polysomnography within 6 months of surgery, (2) previous surgery to the base of the tongue or other surgical treatment of OSAHS, and (3) a history of malignancy or infection of the head and neck region, laryngeal trauma, or other previous oropharyngeal/laryngeal surgery. Data from 27 consecutive patients meeting the above criteria who underwent robotically assisted midline glossectomy + ZPP between October 2010 and January 2011 were reviewed. The other 13 patients who underwent robotic glossectomy were excluded on the basis of missing postoperative polysomnography data, not having undergone ZPP, or not having had 6 months elapse from their date of surgery. Two control groups of patients were selected in the following manner: (1) all patients treated consecutively with SMILE + ZPP between 2008 and 2010 and meeting the above inclusion criteria (22 patients) and (2) all patients treated consecutively prior to 2008 with RFBOT + ZPP and meeting the above inclusion criteria (24 patients). Baseline data obtained for all patients include age, sex, body mass index, and Friedman clinical stage for OSAHS (described in previous publications 6,7 ). All patients had either category II or III clinical obstruction. Objective OSAHS Outcomes Findings on formal 16-lead monitored polysomnography were compared preoperatively and postoperatively within and between groups. Outcomes of particular interest were the AHI and minimum oxygen saturation. Rates of surgical cure were also examined. Cure was defined as achievement of an AHI <20 as well as a reduction in AHI 50%. The weight of tissue removed (in grams) was recorded for all TORS patients. Subjective OSAHS Outcomes Preoperative and postoperative ESS (per patient) and visual analog scale (VAS; 0-10) snoring scores (per bed partner) were recorded.
4 856 Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 146(5) Figure 1. Operating room setup. Anesthesia is set up at the patient s feet, and the surgeon sits at the operating console. The DaVinci robot is rotated 30 relative to the patient. Morbidity/Complications Any major complications related to airway compromise, bleeding, or requirement for revision surgery were recorded. Morbidity was assessed by number of nights spent in the hospital following operation, VAS (0-10) for day 1 postoperative pain, number of days taken to return to normal diet, and number of days taken to return to normal activity. Surgical Technique The objective of midline glossectomy is to enlarge the hypopharyngeal airspace and relieve obstruction. Glossectomy is performed at the midline to allow for aggressive tongue-base resection while minimizing the potential for compromise of the hypoglossal nerve and lingual artery. In all cases, ZPP was performed first. Doing so enlarges the oropharynx and thereby creates extra space for the camera of the robotic arms. ZPP, RFBOT, and SMILE techniques are described in detail in previous publications. 8,9 All patients received perioperative antibiotics (cephalosporin if nonallergic) and steroids. Robotically Assisted Midline Glossectomy The patient is placed in a supine position, with the patient s head placed at the foot of the bed, to allow for accommodation of the robotic cart. The anesthesiologist and anesthesia equipment are located at the patient s feet (Figure 1). The patient s eyes are protected using sterile drapes and eye covers, and the teeth are protected with a dental guard (Figure 2). Patients are placed under general anesthesia and undergo nasotracheal intubation. The oral cavity is then rinsed with
5 Friedman et al 857 Figure 2. The patient is intubated nasally, and a Jennings mouth gag is placed to allow for a transoral surgical approach. The patient s eyes and teeth are protected using eye covers and a mouth guard. 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate. The course of the lingual arteries is identified bilaterally and marked using Doppler ultrasound. After the lingual artery is identified, 10 ml of saline with epinephrine (1:100,000) is injected into the tongue base. The lingual artery must be identified prior to injection of epinephrine since the epinephrine will cause vessel spasm. A small amount (1-2 ml) of bupivacaine may be injected for pain control. Anesthetic is not used with epinephrine for local primary injection because of the potential risk of bilateral hypoglossal paralysis. Although temporary, bilateral hypoglossal paralysis will obstruct the airway in the postoperative period. A Jennings mouth gag is placed to allow for a transoral surgical approach (Figure 2). Two retraction sutures are placed in the anterior aspect of the tongue to allow for forward retraction and better visualization and access to the posterior tongue (Figure 3). Tension on the anterior sutures should be applied laterally to help spread the tongue tissue. Using a Bovie, 2 straight parallel incisions are made at the circumvallate papillae and extended toward the valleculae. Two sutures are then placed at the lateral aspects of the incision site to allow for lateral retraction at the site of incision/glossectomy. The robotic patient side cart is brought into position at a 30 angle to the operating room table. The surgeon sits at a console away from the patient, operating the davinci surgical system (Figure 1). The Schertel and spatula robotic surgical instruments are attached to 5-mm robotic arms. For a righthanded surgeon, we attach the Schertel grasper hand piece to the left robotic arm and the spatula tip to the right arm. Figure 3. Two sutures are placed at the anterior aspect of the tongue to allow for forward retraction. Two straight parallel incisions are made at the midline area between the circumvallate papilla to the valleculae to allow for the raising of a mucosal flap, under which resection takes place. A small strip of mucosa is included with the specimen for grasping so that the submucosal and muscle resection can take place using the spatula tool (Figure 4). The spatula cutting tool resects mucosa and muscle inferiorly in a triangular area (Figure 5). At the end of the procedure, a Maryland tool is exchanged for the spatula on the right arm of the robot, which allows for bipolar cautery. Closure is performed with a 2-0 Vicryl suture. Patients are fully awake and follow commands before extubation is performed. Nasal trumpets should be readily available to alleviate potential hypopharyngeal obstruction. Statistical Analysis Continuous data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance is accepted when P <.05. The 2-tailed independent Student t test is used to compare differences in continuous variables between the robotic group and each of the other 2 groups in turn. The Student t test is used to compare preoperative and postoperative mean values within each group. χ 2 analysis is used to test the association
6 858 Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 146(5) Figure 4. The Schertel tool is attached to the left robotic arm and is used to retract, while the spatula tool is attached to the right robotic arm and is used to resect tissue under the mucosal flap. Two sutures at the lateral margins of the incision provide lateral traction. Figure 5. Mucosa and muscle are resected inferiorly in a triangular area. between categorical variables. Note that no direct comparison is made between the SMILE and RFBOT groups. Results Twenty-seven consecutive patients underwent robotically assisted midline glossectomy + ZPP without tracheotomy. All procedures were completed successfully. A mean 2.28 ± 0.43 g of lingual tissue was excised. Intraoperative complications included mild bleeding (controlled with bipolar cautery) and edema. There were no incidences of significant bleeding or airway complications in the postoperative period. No complications related to tongue mobility, hypoglossal nerve injury, or speech were noted. No patients required revision surgery. Data from 22 consecutive patients who underwent SMILE + ZPP and 24 consecutive patients who underwent RFBOT + ZPP were independently compared with data from the robotic glossectomy group. The baseline characteristics of the 3 groups were homogeneous (Table 1). The average time from the date of surgery to postoperative polysomnography across all groups was 88 ± 78 days. Paired t-test analysis reveals a statistically significant reduction in AHI, snoring VAS, and ESS in all groups; however, only the robotic group achieved a significant improvement in the minimum oxygen saturation (Table 2). A significantly greater percentage improvement in AHI of 60.5% ± 24.9% is seen in the robotic group, compared with 37.0% ± 51.6% (P =.042) and 32.0% ± 43.3% (P =.012) in the SMILE and RFBOT groups, respectively. The proportion of patients who achieved surgical cure was higher in the robotic group (66.7%) compared with both SMILE (45.5%) and RFBOT (20.8%); however, this finding was statistically significant only compared with RFBOT. Within the robotic glossectomy group, no direct correlation was found between the weight of lingual tissue excised and the degree of improvement in AHI, minimum oxygen saturation, or ESS (Figure 6). Day 1 postoperative pain was not increased in the robotic group compared with the other groups. Length of hospital stay was increased in the robotic group compared with the RFBOT group (P =.034). Number of days to return to normal activity was increased compared with RFBOT (P =.015), and number of days to return to normal diet was increased compared with both SMILE (P =.012) and RFBOT (P =.006). Preoperative and postoperative findings within groups are summarized in Table 2. Findings are compared between the robotic glossectomy group and each of the other groups respectively in Table 3. An overall increase in operative time of approximately 1 hour per case was noted in the robotic group. This was largely attributed to time taken for setup of the robotic equipment between the ZPP and glossectomy phases. On average, an increase in turnover time between cases of approximately 30 minutes was also noted. Disposable costs were $730 per robotic procedure and $250 per SMILE or RFBOT procedure. Discussion Our results demonstrate that robotically assisted midline glossectomy can be feasibly performed without the need for
7 Friedman et al 859 Table 1. Comparison of Baseline Characteristics of the Robotic Group to Both SMILE and RFBOT Control Groups a Robot SMILE P Value RFBOT P Value No Age at surgery, y, mean ± SD 43.8 ± ± ± Sex Male Female BMI, kg/m 2, mean ± SD 32.3 ± ± ± Clinical stage.649 II 7 7 NA III NA OSAHS severity Moderate Severe AHI, mean ± SD 54.6 ± ± ± Min O 2 sat, mean ± SD 78.5 ± ± ± Snoring VAS, mean ± SD 9.1 ± ± ± ESS, mean ± SD 14.4 ± ± ± Abbreviations: AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Score; Min O 2 sat, minimum oxygen saturation; NA, data not available; OSAHS, obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome; RFBOT, radiofrequency base-of-tongue reduction; SMILE, submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision; VAS, visual analog scale. a Statistical significance is accepted when P <.05. tracheotomy. To our knowledge, this represents the only study to date in which this approach has been examined. No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications requiring interventional airway management or revision surgery were observed in our series of 27 patients. However, having established that this approach can be safely performed, whether it should be undertaken in preference to other techniques is a different question entirely. Vicini et al 3,4 stated that TORS has a promising future as a treatment of OSAHS, having demonstrated its efficacy in their 2 published case series. In the current study, we find robotically assisted resection to be more effective than the other tongue-base reduction treatments examined with regard to improvement of objective OSAHS parameters, particularly percentage reduction in AHI. Of note, given the small sample sizes in our study, the robotic group was the only one that demonstrated a significant improvement in minimum oxygen saturation. Greater improvements in daytime somnolence were also noted, which were statistically significant compared with RFBOT. A higher rate of surgical cure was observed in the robotic group, and although this finding did not reach statistical significance, we feel it is deserving of further study. We hypothesized that any increase in efficacy observed when using the robotic technique compared with SMILE would be due to a greater degree of tissue resection achieved under direct visualization. This remains the most plausible explanation for the difference in outcomes noted between the otherwise homogeneous robotic and SMILE groups. However, because of the degree of tissue destruction with SMILE, specimens cannot be accurately weighed for comparison. Within the robotic group itself, there was little correlation observed between the mass of lingual tissue removed and the degree of improvement in either objective or subjective parameters. However, there was only minor variance in the tissue mass excised (SD = 0.43 g, maximum = 3.12 g). While we have information regarding the degree of obstruction at the tongue base (Friedman tongue position/clinical stage), when analyzing these trends, the initial tongue mass of individual patients cannot be adequately controlled for. As we gain experience with the robotic technique, a potential link between excised tissue mass and outcomes might yet be examined through further studies in which more aggressive tissue resection is attempted. Although visibility and dexterity within the surgical field are improved with the robotic technique, there remain a number of anatomic constraints that limit the degree of resection that may be attempted. While our triangular resection technique may pose greater risk to the neurovascular bundle than an inverted pyramid technique, it was performed to minimize mucosal and submucosal resection. The area of the vascular bundle was protected following identification with Doppler. The existing literature on TORS for tongue-base reduction in OSAHS as well as oncological purposes reports that the procedure is generally well tolerated. 3,4,5,10 As all patients underwent concomitant ZPP, the pain and postoperative morbidity associated with this procedure should be equivalent across groups, and any differences observed ought to be related to the respective tongue-base procedure. In our wider series of more than 40 patients, no significant complications relating to tongue mobility, hypoglossal nerve injury, or speech have been noted. Robotic patients in our series spent an average 0.5 nights longer in the hospital than RFBOT patients. Postoperative pain on day 1 was not increased in our robotic group compared with either minimally invasive control group. However, at follow-up appointments, a greater proportion of patients in the robotic group complained of
8 860 Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 146(5) Figure 6. Relationship between excised tissue mass and outcomes in the robotic group (linear regression analysis). prolonged dysphagia. This is reflected in our data on return to normal diet, where robotic patients took significantly longer than both SMILE and RFBOT patients to achieve this end. These findings differ markedly from those reported by Vicini et al, 3,4 although this may be explained by differences in the way this metric was measured. We believe this increase in dysphagia may be due to both increased tissue removal and heat damage caused through the use of unipolar cautery. By contrast, tissue resection in SMILE occurs at much lower temperature. Return to normal activity was also slower in the robotic group than for RFBOT but equivalent with SMILE. Aside from the efficacy and associated morbidity of the procedure, an additional consideration should be the practicality of performing robotically assisted surgery, including time and cost. In a 2007 cost-analysis study, Barbash and Glied 11 estimated an additional variable cost across 20 robotically assisted procedures (not including head and neck procedures) of $1600. We found disposable costs for robotic glossectomy to be lower than this estimate, with an average per-procedure cost of $730. An increase in operative time and turnover time between cases is likely to drive costs significantly higher. However, with increasing operator experience and training for OR staff in particular, the effects of these delays may be minimized. While we currently report an increase in operative time of approximately 1 hour per case (largely attributable to setup time), in their experience with a series of more than 60 patients, Vicini et al 4 reported a mean setup time approaching 30 minutes.
9 Friedman et al 861 Table 2. Within-Group Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Objective and Subjective Treatment Outcomes a Robot SMILE RFBOT Preoperative AHI 54.6 ± ± ± 26.6 Postoperative AHI 18.6 ± ± ± 22.5 P value <.001 b.002 b.007 b Preoperative min O 2 sat 78.5 ± ± ± 7.8 Postoperative min O 2 sat 86.5 ± ± ± 7.5 P value <.001 b Preoperative snoring VAS 9.1 ± ± ± 0.8 Postoperative snoring VAS 2.3 ± ± ± 2.6 P value <.001 b <.001 b <.001 b Preoperative ESS 14.4 ± ± ± 2.8 Postoperative ESS 5.4 ± ± ± 3.5 P value <.001 b <.001 b <.001 b Abbreviations: AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Score; Min O 2 sat, minimum oxygen saturation; RFBOT, radiofrequency base-of-tongue reduction; SMILE, submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision; VAS, visual analog scale. a All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. b Significant (statistical significance is accepted when P <.05). Table 3. Comparison of Postoperative Subjective and Objective Treatment Outcomes and Morbidity between the Robotic Group and Both SMILE and RFBOT Control Groups Robot SMILE P Value RFBOT P Value AHI reduction, mean ± SD 36.1 ± ± ± a % AHI reduction, mean ± SD 60.5 ± ± a 32.0 ± a Improvement min O 2 sat, mean ± SD 8.0 ± ± ± Surgical success, % a Cure, n No cure, n Snoring VAS reduction, mean ± SD 5.9 ± ± ± ESS reduction, mean ± SD 8.7 ± ± ± a Day 1 pain VAS, mean ± SD 8.2 ± ± ± Nights in hospital, mean ± SD 1.6 ± ± ± a Days to normal activity, mean ± SD 12.9 ± ± ± a Days to normal diet, mean ± SD 19.3 ± ± a 13.3 ± a Abbreviations: AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Score; Min O 2 sat, minimum oxygen saturation; VAS, visual analog scale. a Significant (statistical significance is accepted when P <.05). Conclusion Robotically assisted midline glossectomy may be safely performed without the need for preoperative tracheotomy. In our group of patients, robotic glossectomy combined with ZPP resulted in a greater reduction in AHI when compared with either SMILE/ZPP or RFBOT/ZPP. Morbidity was increased, with a longer recovery time needed for return to normal diet. Procedural costs and operating room time were increased with the robotic technique versus the other techniques studied. Acknowledgment We acknowledge Evie Baumann, Advanced Center for Specialty Care, Chicago, Illinois, for data collection. Author Contributions Michael Friedman, study design, surgical procedures, data collection/ interpretation, drafting/revision, presentation; Craig Hamilton, study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, drafting/revision; Christian G. Samuelson, study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, drafting/revision; Kanwar Kelley, study design, institutional review board (IRB) submission, data collection, drafting; David Taylor, study design, IRB submission, data collection, drafting; Kristine Pearson-Chauhan, study design, IRB submission, data collection, drafting; Alexander Maley, study design, IRB submission, data collection, drafting; Renwick Taylor, data collection; T. K. Venkatesan, study design, surgical procedures, data collection, revision. Disclosures Competing interests: Michael Friedman is the recipient of a grant for a study on nasal irrigation as treatment for sinonasal symptoms from TriCord Pharmaceuticals and is a member of the speaker s bureau for Glaxo-Smith-Kline. Sponsorships: None. Funding source: This study was funded in its entirety by the principal investigator (Michael Friedman, MD). The authors have no financial associations with Intuitive Surgical.
10 862 Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 146(5) References 1. Friedman M. Sleep Apnea and Snoring: Surgical and Non-surgical Therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; O Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope.2006;116: Vicini C, Dallan I, Canzi P, et al. Transoral robotic tongue base resection in obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome: a preliminary report. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2010;72: Vicini C, Dallan I, Canzi P, et al. Transoral robotic surgery of the tongue base in obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome: anatomic considerations and clinical experience. Head Neck. 2012;34(1): Hockstein NG, O Malley BW Jr. Transoral robotic surgery. Operative techniques in otolaryngology. 2008;19: Friedman M, Ibrahim H, Bass L. Clinical staging for sleep-disordered breathing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;127(1): Friedman M, Ibrahim H, Joseph N. Staging of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: a guide to appropriate treatment. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(3): Friedman M, Ibrahim HZ, Vidyasagar R, et al. Z-palatoplasty (ZPP): a technique for patients without tonsils. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131(1): Friedman M, Soans R, Gurpinar B, et al. Evaluation of submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision technique for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139: Weinstein GS, O Malley BW Jr, Desai SC, et al. Transoral robotic surgery: does the ends justify the means? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;17: Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:
Updated Friedman Staging System for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Updated Friedman Staging System for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Michael Friedman a, b Anna M. Salapatas b Lauren B. Bonzelaar c a Section of Sleep Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, and b Section of
More informationComparing Upper Airway Stimulation to Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty: A Single University Experience
771395AORXXX10.1177/0003489418771395Annals of Otology, Rhinology & LaryngologyHuntley et al research-article2018 Original Article Comparing Upper Airway Stimulation to Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty:
More informationTransoral robotic surgery for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: factors predicting surgical response.
Laryngoscope. 05 Apr;5(4):03-0. doi: 0.00/lary.4970. Epub 04 Oct 4. Transoral robotic surgery for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: factors predicting surgical response. Lin HS, Rowley JA, Folbe AJ,
More informationSnoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Patient s Guide to Minimally Invasive Treatments Chapter 6
Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Patient s Guide to Minimally Invasive Treatments Chapter 6 MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENTS OF SNORING AND SLEEP APNEA OVERVIEW The past decade has seen the rise of effective,
More informationTransoral Robotic Surgery for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome
The Laryngoscope VC 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Transoral Robotic Surgery for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Ho-Sheng Lin, MD; James
More informationPerioperative Care in OSA Surgery
Perioperative Care in OSA Surgery Overview Estimate of Major Peri-Op Complications Risk Factors for Airway Complications Peri-Operative Planning Avoidance of Complications Andrew N. Goldberg, MD, MSCE
More informationCoblation-assisted Lewis and MacKay operation (CobLAMO): new technique for tongue reduction in sleep apnoea surgery
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2013 Coblation-assisted Lewis and MacKay operation (CobLAMO): new technique
More informationNeuromuscular Stimulation for Sleep Apnea. Overview 1/24/2013. Disclosures. Midline Glossectomy. Palate + Hypopharyngeal Surgery: BMI
Neuromuscular Stimulation for Sleep Apnea Disclosures The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation: Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH Director, Division
More information11/19/2012 ก! " Varies 5-86% in men 2-57% in women. Thailand 26.4% (Neruntarut et al, Sleep Breath (2011) 15: )
Snoring ก Respiratory sound generated in the upper airway during sleep that typically occurs during inspiration but may occur during expiration ICSD-2, 2005..... ก ก! Prevalence of snoring Varies 5-86%
More informationTranssubmental tongue-base suspension in treating patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea after failed uvulopalatopharyngoplasty:
CORRESPONDENCE: OUR EXPERIENCE Transsubmental tongue-base suspension in treating patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea after failed uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: Our Experience Huang, T.-W.,* Su,
More informationOBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA and WORK Treatment Update
OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA and WORK Treatment Update David Claman, MD Professor of Medicine Director, UCSF Sleep Disorders Center 415-885-7886 Disclosures: None Chronic Sleep Deprivation (0 v 4 v 6 v 8 hrs)
More informationObstructive Sleep Apnea- Hypopnea Syndrome and Snoring: Surgical Options
Obstructive Sleep Apnea- Hypopnea Syndrome and Snoring: Surgical Options Joshua L. Kessler, MD, FACS Boston ENT Associates Clinical Instructor, Otology and Laryngology Harvard Medical School Why Consider
More informationSurgical Treatment of OSA. Han-Soo Bae, MD Monroe Ear Nose and Throat Associates May 5, 2017
Surgical Treatment of OSA Han-Soo Bae, MD Monroe Ear Nose and Throat Associates May 5, 2017 Disclosure None Treatment of OSA PAP Oral appliance Surgery OSA and Mortality Surgical Treatment of OSA Surgery
More informationRobot-assisted, volumetric tongue base reduction and pharyngeal surgery for obstructive sleep apnea
Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology (2012) 23, 48-55 Robot-assisted, volumetric tongue base reduction and pharyngeal surgery for obstructive sleep apnea Samuel Robinson, FRACS, a Suren Krishnan, OAM,
More informationComprehensive care of any disease requires expertise in
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (2010) 143, 78-84 ORIGINAL RESEARCH SLEEP MEDICINE Otolaryngology office-based treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome with titratable and nontitratable
More informationHypertrophic lingual tonsils may obstruct the retrolingual
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 134, 328-330 CLINICAL TECHNIQUES AND TECHNOLOGY Lingual Tonsillectomy Using Bipolar Radiofrequency Plasma Excision Sam Robinson, MB, BS, FRACS, Sandra L. Ettema,
More informationTreating OSA? Don't Forget the Tongue
From: ENT Today, January 2008 Treating OSA? Don't Forget the Tongue by Pippa Wysong Although otolaryngologic surgeons commonly focus on the palate when treating patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA),
More informationSurgical Options for the Successful Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Surgical Options for the Successful Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Benjamin J. Teitelbaum, MD, FACS Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Saint Agnes Medical Center Fresno, California Terms Apnea
More informationDoes Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Predict Surgical Success in Transoral Robotic Multilevel Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
The Laryngoscope VC 2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Does Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Predict Surgical Success in Transoral Robotic Multilevel Surgery in Obstructive
More informationRobotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy for sleep apnoea
Robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy for sleep apnoea You have been given this leaflet because you have been referred for a robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy for sleep apnoea. This leaflet offers
More informationTolerance of Positive Airway Pressure following Site-Specific Surgery of Upper Airway
34 The Open Sleep Journal, 2008, 1, 34-39 Open Access Tolerance of Positive Airway Pressure following Site-Specific Surgery of Upper Airway Ho-Sheng Lin *,#,1,2, Roger Toma #,2, Cara Glavin 2, Mark Toma
More informationContemporary Snoring Management
Contemporary Snoring Management Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH Director, Division of Sleep Surgery Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California, San Francisco ekezirian@ohns.ucsf.edu Sleepsurgery.ucsf.edu
More informationThe surgical plane for lingual tonsillectomy: an anatomic study
Son et al. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (2016) 45:22 DOI 10.1186/s40463-016-0137-3 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The surgical plane for lingual tonsillectomy: an anatomic study
More informationTemperature controlled radiofrequency ablation for OSA
Temperature controlled radiofrequency ablation for OSA Ridhwan Y. Baba, M.B.B.S. *1, V.V.S. Ramesh Metta, M.B.B.S. 1, Arjun Mohan, M.B.B.S. 2, M. Jeffery Mador, M.D. 2 1 Department of Internal Medicine,
More informationTrans Oral Robotic Surgery
Trans Oral Robotic Surgery 1 by Leonardo da Vinci 2 Claudio Vicini, MD Filippo Montevecchi,MD Department of Special Surgery, Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Division, Oral Surgery Unit ( Head: Prof.
More informationSnoring: What Works?
Snoring: What Works? Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH Director, Division of Sleep Surgery Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California, San Francisco ekezirian@ohns.ucsf.edu Sleepsurgery.ucsf.edu
More informationUpper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Upper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Background, Mechanism and Clinical Data Overview Seth Hollen RPSGT 21 May 2016 1 Conflicts of Interest Therapy Support Specialist, Inspire Medical Systems
More informationAssociation of Palatine Tonsil Size and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults
The Laryngoscope VC 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Association of Palatine Tonsil Size and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults Sebastian M. Jara, MD ; Edward
More informationRoles of Surgery in OSA MASM Annual Fall Conference 2017 October 14, 2017 Kathleen Yaremchuk, MD, MSA Chair, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and
Roles of Surgery in OSA MASM Annual Fall Conference 2017 October 14, 2017 Kathleen Yaremchuk, MD, MSA Chair, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery Senior Staff Sleep Medicine Henry Ford Hospital
More informationEffect of two types of mandibular advancement splints on snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea
European Journal of Orthodontics 20 (1998) 293 297 1998 European Orthodontic Society Effect of two types of mandibular advancement splints on snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea J. Lamont*, D. R. Baldwin**,
More informationSurgery of the Hypopharynx So Many Choices. Overview 1/10/2018. Disclosures. Why Hypopharyngeal Surgery? AI RDI LSAT. Why hypopharyngeal surgery?
Surgery of the Hypopharynx So Many Choices Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH Professor, Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery President, International Surgical Sleep Society Sleep-Doctor.com Eric.Kezirian@med.usc.edu
More information11/7/2014. Disclosure Dr. Walvekar, I have the following relationship(s) with commercial interests.
TORS & Supraglottic Laryngectomy Disclosure Dr. Walvekar, I have the following relationship(s) with commercial interests. Hood Laboratories Rec. Royalties Cook Industries Rec. Honoraria Medtronic Rec.
More informationUsing Questionnaire Tools to Predict Pediatric OSA outcomes. Vidya T. Raman, MD Nationwide Children s Hospital October 201
Using Questionnaire Tools to Predict Pediatric OSA outcomes Vidya T. Raman, MD Nationwide Children s Hospital October 201 NCH Conflict of Interest SASM $10,000 Grant NCH intramural/interdepartmental $38,000
More informationHyoid Bone Suspension as a Part of Multilevel Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
266 Original Research THIEME Hyoid Bone Suspension as a Part of Multilevel Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Abd Alzaher Tantawy 1 Sherif Mohammad Askar 1 Hazem Saeed Amer 1 Ali Awad 1 Mohammad
More informationObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder
Original Research Sleep Medicine and Surgery Drug-Induced Sedation Endoscopy in the Evaluation of OSA Patients with Incomplete Oral Appliance Therapy Response Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2015,
More informationCorporate Medical Policy
Corporate Medical Policy PALATOPHARYNGOPLASTY/UVULOPALATOPHARYGOPLASTY Description of Procedure or Service Palatopharyngoplasty refers to several surgical approaches for management of the upper airway,
More informationInspire. therapy for sleep apnea. Giving you the freedom to sleep like everyone else
Inspire therapy for sleep apnea Giving you the freedom to sleep like everyone else Take Comfort. Take Action. Inspire therapy can help. Here are some reasons people like you have chosen Inspire therapy
More informationPediatric partial cricotracheal resection: A new technique for the posterior cricoid anastomosis
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 135, 318-322 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Pediatric partial cricotracheal resection: A new technique for the posterior cricoid anastomosis Mark E. Boseley, MD, and Christopher
More informationFacing Surgery for Throat Cancer? Learn about minimally invasive da Vinci Surgery for early to moderate stage throat cancer.
Facing Surgery for Throat Cancer? Learn about minimally invasive da Vinci Surgery for early to moderate stage throat cancer. Surgery Options If you have been diagnosed with throat cancer, your doctor will
More informationPROCEDURE GUIDE For Better Clinical Outcomes in CELON ENT Procedures
PROCEDURE GUIDE For Better Clinical Outcomes in CELON ENT Procedures 15152 1 DISCLAIMER TABLE OF CONTENTS The surgical technique herein is presented to demonstrate the method utilized by Dr. F. Yildiz.
More informationInspire Therapy for Sleep Apnea
Inspire Therapy for Sleep Apnea Patient Guide Giving You the FREEDOM TO SLEEP Like Everyone Else Take Comfort. Inspire therapy can help. Inspire therapy is a breakthrough implantable treatment option for
More informationClinical Predictors of Effective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome
The Laryngoscope VC 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Clinical Predictors of Effective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea
More informationTongue Coblation via the Ventral Approach for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome Surgery
The Laryngoscope VC 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Tongue Coblation via the Ventral Approach for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome Surgery Tiening Hou,
More informationMaxillomandibular Advancement for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 06 Jan ;():8-66. doi: 0.00/jamaoto.0.678. Maxillomandibular Advancement for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis. Zaghi S, Holty JE, Certal V, Abdullatif
More informationTaste Disturbance Following Tongue Base Resection for OSA
The Laryngoscope VC 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Taste Disturbance Following Tongue Base Resection for OSA Hsin-Ching Lin, MD, FACS; Michelle S. Hwang, BS;
More informationTransoral robotic total laryngectomy: Report of 3 cases
CASE REPORT Amy Chen, MD, Section Editor Transoral robotic total laryngectomy: Report of 3 cases Samuel Dowthwaite, MBBS, 1 Anthony C Nichols, MD, 1 John Yoo, MD, 1 Richard V. Smith, MD, 2 Sandeep Dhaliwal,
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE. First-Choice Treatment in Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea
ORIGINAL ARTICLE First-Choice Treatment in Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Single-Stage, Multilevel, Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Tissue Volume Reduction or Nasal Continuous Positive
More informationMandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Relating Outcomes to Anatomy
Research Original Investigation Mandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Relating Outcomes to Anatomy Michael Friedman, MD; Kristin Shnowske, DO; Craig Hamilton, MBChB; Christian G. Samuelson,
More informationOutcomes of Upper Airway Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Original Research Outcomes of Upper Airway Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hadiseh Hosseiny 1, Nafiseh Naeimabadi 1, Arezu Najafi 1 *, Reihaneh Heidari 1, Khosro Sadeghniiat-Haghighi 1 1. Occupational
More informationRobotic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep (2013) 1:130 136 DOI 10.1007/s40136-013-0022-9 ROBOTIC SURGERY IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY (MC SINGER & DJ TERRIS, SECTION EDITORS) Robotic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Claudio
More informationEvaluation, Management and Long-Term Care of OSA in Adults
Evaluation, Management and Long-Term Care of OSA in Adults AUGUST 2015 Providing diagnostic tools and therapies that are evidence-based is a key part of a successful sleep practice. This resource outlines
More informationA Reversible Uvulopalatal Flap for Snoring and Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Sleep, 19(7):593-599 1996 American Sleep Disorders Association and Sleep Research Society Short Report: Surgical Technique A Reversible Uvulopalatal Flap for Snoring and Sleep Apnea Syndrome Nelson Powell,
More informationAlexander C Vlantis. Total Laryngectomy 57
07 Total Laryngectomy Alexander C Vlantis Total Laryngectomy 57 Total Laryngectomy STEP 1 INCISION AND POSITION OF STOMA A superiorly based apron flap incision is marked with the horizontal limb placed
More informationTonsillectomy Hemorrhage. DR Tran Quoc Huy ENT department
Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage complication DR Tran Quoc Huy ENT department Topic Outline INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW OF INDICATIONS CONTRAINDICATIONS COMPLICATIONS HEMORRHAGE COMPLICATION INTRODUCTION Tonsillectomy
More informationProvent Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Impact of Nasal Obstruction
The Laryngoscope VC 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Provent Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Impact of Nasal Obstruction Michael Friedman, MD; Michelle S
More informationSKUP 3 : 6 and 24 Months Follow-up of Changes in Respiration and Sleepiness After Modified UPPP
The Laryngoscope VC 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. SKUP 3 : 6 and 24 Months Follow-up of Changes in Respiration and Sleepiness After Modified UPPP Nanna Browaldh,
More informationCancer of the Oral Cavity
The International Federation of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies Current Concepts in Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology Cancer of the Oral Cavity Ashok Shaha Principals of Management of Oral Cancer A)
More informationOutline. Major variables contributing to airway patency/collapse. OSA- Definition
Outline Alicia Gruber Kalamas, MD Associate Clinical Professor of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care University of California, San Francisco September 2011 Definition Pathophysiology Patient Risk Factors
More informationTHE PATIENT STRONGLY MOTIVATED TOWARDS THE TREATMENT? & ENT
SNORING & OSAHS SURGERY International Workshop Preoperative Diagnostic Protocol < 15 min Filippo Montevecchi M.D. Department of Special Surgery Head & Neck Surgery, Oral Surgery Unit (Head: C.Vicini) G.B.
More informationMicrodebrider. Microdebrider. Mohamed Hesham,MD. The Management of Different Laryngeal Lesions. Dr. Ahmad Yassin 4/11/2013
Microdebrider In The Management of Different Laryngeal Lesions Mohamed Hesham,MD Dr. Ahmad Yassin Otolaryngology Head&Neck Surgery Alexandria Faculty of Medicine Microdebrider The microdebrider is a powered
More informationPediatric Obstructive Sleep apnea An update What else is there to know?
Pediatric Obstructive Sleep apnea An update What else is there to know? Garani S. Nadaraja, MD, FAAP Medical Director BCH-Oakland Clinical Assistant Professor Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology UCSF
More informationPrefabricated Oral Appliances for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Medical Policy Manual Allied Health, Policy No. 36 Prefabricated Oral Appliances for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Next Review: May 2019 Last Review: April 2018 Effective: May 1, 2018 IMPORTANT REMINDER Medical
More informationSelecting Hypopharyngeal Surgery in OSA
Selecting Hypopharyngeal Surgery in OSA Disclosures The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation: Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH Professor Eric.Kezirian@med.usc.edu
More informationSnoring. Forty-five percent of normal adults snore at least occasionally and 25
Snoring Insight into sleeping disorders and sleep apnea Forty-five percent of normal adults snore at least occasionally and 25 percent are habitual snorers. Problem snoring is more frequent in males and
More informationManagement of OSA. saurabh maji
Management of OSA saurabh maji INTRODUCTION Obstructive sleep apnea is a major public health problem Prevalence of OSAS in INDIA is 2.4% to 4.96% in men and 1% to 2 % in women In the rest of the world
More informationTRANSORAL ROBOTIC SURGERY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER: A PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE
ORIGINAL ARTICLE TRANSORAL ROBOTIC SURGERY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER: A PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE Eric M. Genden, MD, Shaun Desai, BA, Chih-Kwang Sung, MD, MS Department of Otolaryngology,
More informationSURGERY FOR SNORING AND MILD OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA
SURGERY FOR SNORING AND MILD OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA INTRODUCTION Snoring with or without excessive daytime somnolence, restless sleep and periods of apnoea are all manifestations of sleep disordered
More informationBiomedicine and Nursing 2017;3(1)
Anesthetic concerns in transoral robotic surgery: initial experience of thirty-three cases. Ezgi ERKILIÇ, Elvin KESİMCİ, Halide CEYHAN, Mustafa AKSOY* Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology
More informationIntroduction OPT has been shown to effectively treat sleep apnea in about 40% of patients (Colrain IM et al. Sleep Medicine 14; , 2013)
Oral Pressure Therapy for OSA Oral Pressure Therapy for OSA - Disclosures Richard J. Schwab, M.D. Professor of Medicine Division of Sleep Medicine Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division University
More information(1) TONSILS & ADENOIDS
(1) TONSILS & ADENOIDS (2) Your child has been referred to have his tonsils and adenoids removed. This operation is commonly called an adenotonsillectomy and is one of the most common major operations
More informationInspire Therapy for Sleep Apnea
Inspire Therapy for Sleep Apnea Patient Guide Giving You the FREEDOM TO SLEEP Like Everyone Else Take Comfort. Inspire therapy can help. Inspire therapy is a breakthrough implantable treatment option for
More informationHypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Surgery for treatment of OSA. Disclosures. Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation 11/9/2016
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Surgery for treatment of OSA olando Molina MD South Florida ENT Associates A Disclosures I do not have any relevant financial disclosures at this time. Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation
More informationTRANSORAL ROBOTIC SURGERY OF THE TONGUE BASE IN OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA-HYPOPNEA SYNDROME: ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
ORIGINAL ARTICLE TRANSORAL ROBOTIC SURGERY OF THE TONGUE BASE IN OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA-HYPOPNEA SYNDROME: ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE Claudio Vicini, MD, 1 Iacopo Dallan, MD, 2 Pietro
More informationPolysomnography (PSG) (Sleep Studies), Sleep Center
Policy Number: 1036 Policy History Approve Date: 07/09/2015 Effective Date: 07/09/2015 Preauthorization All Plans Benefit plans vary in coverage and some plans may not provide coverage for certain service(s)
More information(Surgically) Treating OSA in 2012 and Beyond
(Surgically) Treating OSA in 2012 and Beyond Edward M. Weaver, MD, MPH Seattle VA Medical Center University of Washington Harborview Medical Center Acknowledgments This material is the result of work supported
More informationUpper Airway Obstruction
Upper Airway Obstruction Adriaan Pentz Division of Otorhinolaryngology University of Stellenbosch and Tygerberg Hospital Stridor/Stertor Auditory manifestations of disordered respiratory function ie noisy
More informationAnyone of any shape or size may snore, but there are certain features which significantly increase the chance of snoring.
Snoring Snoring is a common sleep related problem affecting more than 20% of the population at some stage in their lives. Snoring occurs when various parts of the throat, including the soft palate, tonsils
More informationOBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA and WORK Treatment Update
OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA and WORK Treatment Update David Claman, MD Professor of Medicine Director, UCSF Sleep Disorders Center 415-885-7886 Disclosres: None Chronic Sleep Deprivation (0 v 4 v 6 v 8 hrs)
More informationPharyngeal Flap. Gregory C. Allen, MD
Pharyngeal Flap Gregory C. Allen, MD Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology Associate Medical Director, Cleft Palate Team Children's Hospital Colorado Associate Professor Departments of Otolaryngology
More informationINGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE GUIDE
ROOM CONFIGURATION The following figure shows an overhead view of the recommended OR configuration for a da Vinci Inguinal Hernia Repair (Figure 1). NOTE: Configuration of the operating room suite is dependent
More informationWRHA Surgery Program. Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
WRHA Surgery Program Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) March 2010 Prepared by WRHA Surgery & Anesthesiology Programs Objectives 1. Define obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). 2. Purpose of the guidelines. 3. Identify
More informationDr Alireza Yarahmadi and Dr Arvind Perathur Mercy Medical Center - Winter Retreat Des Moines February 2012
Dr Alireza Yarahmadi and Dr Arvind Perathur Mercy Medical Center - Winter Retreat Des Moines February 2012 Why screen of OSA prior to surgery? What factors increase the risk? When due to anticipate problems?
More informationAnesthesia Considerations for Dynamic Upper Airway Evaluation
Anesthesia Considerations for Dynamic Upper Airway Evaluation Mohamed Mahmoud MD Associate Professor of Anesthesia & Pediatrics Cincinnati Children s Hospital Medical Center Objectives Diagnosis of Sleep
More informationPOLICY All patients will be assessed for risk factors associated with OSA prior to any surgical procedures.
Revised Date: Page: 1 of 7 SCOPE All Pre-Admission Testing (PAT) and Same Day Surgery (SDS) nurses at HRMC. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for identifying surgical patients
More informationTongue Base Reduction with Radiofrequency Tissue Ablation: Preliminary Results after Two Treatment Sessions
SLEEP AND BREATHING VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2000 Tongue Base Reduction with Radiofrequency Tissue Ablation: Preliminary Results after Two Treatment Sessions BORIS A. STUCK, M.D., JOACHIM T. MAURER, M.D., and KARL
More informationResearch Article Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Changes the Treatment Concept in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
BioMed Research International Volume 2016, Article ID 6583216, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6583216 Research Article Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Changes the Treatment Concept in Patients with
More informationENT cancer surgery. Bourgain Jean Louis. May 15, 2016
ENT cancer surgery Bourgain Jean Louis May 15, 2016 Predictors of impossible mask ventilation Kheterpal, S Anesthesiology. 110(4):891-897, April 2009. 53041 patients All patients treated by neck radiation
More informationUvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy in the treatment of severe OSAS
B-ENT, 2009, 5, 245-250 Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy in the treatment of severe OSAS S. Gallina*, F. Dispenza**, G. Kulamarva***, A. Ballacchino**** and Riccardo Speciale**** *Dipartimento
More informationArchives of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
v Clinical Group Archives of Otolaryngology and Rhinology ISSN: 2455-1759 DOI CC By Shuhua Li 1 *, Chunhai Shi 1, Dongmei Yu 2, Wancheng Chen 2 and Dahai Wu 1 1 From the Department of Otolaryngology-head
More informationLaser Cordectomy. Glottic Carcinoma
Laser Cordectomy in Glottic Carcinoma Department of Otolaryngology gy Head & Neck Surgery Alexandria University Historical Review Endolaryngeal extirpation of vocal cord cancers is a controversial o issue
More informationAlexandria Workshop on
Alexandria Workshop on 1 Snoring & OSA Surgery Course Director: Yassin Bahgat MD Claudio Vicini MD Course Board: Filippo Montevecchi MD Pietro Canzi MD Snoring & Obstructive ti Sleep Apnea The basic information
More informationTransoral Robotic Surgery for Upper Airway Pathology in the Pediatric Population
The Laryngoscope VC 2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Transoral Robotic Surgery for Upper Airway Pathology in the Pediatric Population Carlton J. Zdanski, MD;
More informationTHE RISE AND FALL(?) OF UPPP FOR SLEEP APNEA COPYRIGHT NOTICE
THE RISE AND FALL(?) OF UPPP FOR SLEEP APNEA COPYRIGHT NOTICE Washington University grants permission to use and reproduce the The Rise and Fall(?) of UPPP for Sleep Apnea as it appears in the PDF available
More informationRADICAL CYSTECTOMY. Solutions for minimally invasive urologic surgery
RADICAL CYSTECTOMY Solutions for minimally invasive urologic surgery The da Vinci Surgical System High-definition 3D vision EndoWrist instrumentation Intuitive motion RADICAL CYSTECTOMY Maintains the oncologic
More informationTHN. Sleep Therapy Study. ImThera. Information for Participants. Caution: Investigational device. Limited by United States law to investigational use.
THN Sleep Therapy Study Information for Participants Caution: Investigational device. Limited by United States law to investigational use. ImThera Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a very serious condition.
More informationAnesthetic consideration in Clefts & Craniofacial surgery
Anesthetic consideration in Clefts & Craniofacial surgery พญ.เด อนเพ ญ ห อร ตนาเร อง ภาคว ชาว ส ญญ ว ทยา คณะแพทย แพทยศาสตร มหาว ทยาล ยขอนแก น Preoperative evaluation Cleft lip & Cleft palate reconstruction
More informationRecognizing the Difficult Airway in Pediatric Patients. Nancy L. Glass, MD, MBA,
Recognizing the Difficult Airway in Pediatric Patients Nancy L. Glass, MD, MBA, FAAP nglass@bcm.edu @DrNancyGlass1 None Disclosures Learning Objectives At the end of this presentation, participants will
More informationAbdussalam Alahmari ENT Resident R2 KAUH 15/12/2015
Abdussalam Alahmari ENT Resident R2 KAUH 15/12/2015 Physiology of sleep Snoring mechanism, causes, sites, symptoms, and management. Sleep apnea definitions, pathophysiology, risk factors, evaluation of
More informationPart II: Rotator Cuff Repair, Day of Surgery and Postoperative Course
Part II: Rotator Cuff Repair, Day of Surgery and Postoperative Course Benjamin W. Sears, MD 303-321-1333 western-ortho.com denvershoulder.com Day of Surgery Most patients will undergo outpatient surgery
More information