TRF.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "TRF."

Nathaniel Kelly
5 years ago
Views:

1 eacher Report Form, Child Behavioral Checklist, CBCL RF

2 he Effects of the riple P-Positive Parenting Program on J Babol Univ Med Sci; 11(2); Jun- Jul 2009 ; E. Pourahmadi, et al n RF (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-IV) Sanders RF CBCL DSM-IV-R CBCL

3 Sanders Sanders U Lester Spratt Scohill Nielsen Larsson Mean±SD

4 he Effects of the riple P-Positive Parenting Program on J Babol Univ Med Sci; 11(2); Jun- Jul 2009 ; E. Pourahmadi, et al he Effect of the riple P-Positive Parenting Program on Children with Somatic Complaints E. Pourahmadi (MS) 1, M. Jalali (MS) 2, R. Roshan (PhD) 3, A. Abedin (PhD) 4 1. MS in Child and Adolescent Clinical Psychology, University of Shahid Beheshti, ehran, Iran 2. MS in Clinical Psychology, University of Shahed, ehran, Iran 3. Assistant Professor of Psychology, University of Shahed, ehran, Iran 4. Assistant Professor of Psychology, University of Shahid Beheshti, ehran, Iran Received: Jun 29 th 2008, Revised: Sep 17 th 2008, Accepted: Feb 18 th ABSRAC BACKGROUND AND OBJECIVE: he presence of physical complaints of unknown etiology is a fairly common occurrence in pediatric populations and often interferes with school, home life, and peer relationships. here are potential relationships among parental illness, parental stress and particularly, negative parent-child relationships and dysfunctional parenting style and children's somatic complaints. he purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the triple p-positive parenting program on children with somatic complaints. MEHODS: his research is a semi-experimental design with pre-post test and control group. Eighteen mothers whose children had received scores above of cut-point (=64) on somatic symptoms subtest of child behavioral checklist (CBCL) and their problems were also confirmed by the teacher report form (RF) were selected and randomly allocated to the experimental (n=9) and control (n=9) groups. Experimental group received triple-p for 8 weeks, single a week sessions lasted two hours. Both groups of mothers were evaluated again by CBCL. FINDINGS: Mean age of subjects in experimental group was 32.2±4.4 and in control group was 31.8±4.3 years. In control group, mean pre-test score was 3.8±0.8 and mean post-test score was 3.6±0.9. In experimental group, mean pre-test score and mean post-test score was 3.7±0.7 and 2.8±1.1, respectively. Also difference in score in control group was 0.2±0.4 that showed a significant difference (0.05). CONCLUSION: his research showed that the triple p-positive parenting program should be implemented for parents without considering their children's age and sex. KEY WORDS: riple p-positive parenting program, Somatic complaints, Child behavioral checklist, eacher report form. References 1. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, et al. he Functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA 1989; 262(7): Corresponding Author; Address: No: 13, Corner of Laleh 8, Babaee Ave, St. Parvaz, abriz, Iran, Zip code: empj1359@yahoo.com

5 2. Brown JW, Robertson LS, Kosa J, Alpert JJ. A study of general practice in Massachusetts. JAMA 1971; 216(2): Larsson BS. Somatic complaints and their relationship to depressive symptoms in Swedish adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1991; 32(5): Garber J, Walker LS, Zeman J. Somatization symptoms in a community sample of children and adolescents: further validation of the children's somatization inventory. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 3(13): Oster J. Recurrent abdominal pain, headache, and limb pains in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1972; 50(3): Sadok B, Sadok V. Psychiatric handbook. Behavioral sciences-clinical psychiatry, Volume 2, 8th ed, ehran, Ab Publication 2004; pp: [in Persian] 7. Dadsetan P. Developmental psychopathology, Volume 1, 5 th ed, ehran, Samt Publication 2006; pp: [in Persian] 8. Mullick MS. Somatoform disorders in children and adolescents. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2002; 28(3): Khalilian AR, Hassanzadeh R, Zarghami M. o study the relationship between the psychogenic factors and physical complain scale in school students of Sari ownship in J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2000, 10 (26): [in Persian] 10. Buddeberg FB, Gnam G. School type, school stress and health problem in Zurich middle school students. J Pediatr Psychol 1995; 26(5): Lackner JM, Gudleski GD, Blanchard EB. Beyond abuse: the association among parenting style, abdominal pain, and somatization in IBS patients. Behav Res her 2004; 42(1): Atlas JA, Wolfson MA, Lipschitz DS. Dissociation and somatization in adolescent inpatients with and without history of abuse. Psychol Rep 1995; 76(3 Pt 2): Craig K, Boardman AP, Mills K. he South London somatisation study. I: Longitudinal course and the influence of early life experiences. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 163(12): Beck JE. A developmental perspective on functional somatic symptoms. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 86(7): Spratt EG. Somatoform disorder: Somatization. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1994; 33(3): Rhee H. Physical symptoms in children and adolescents. In: Miles MS, Holditch-Davis D, editors. Enhancing nursing research with children and families using a developmental science perspective. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co 2003; pp: Radmanesh M, Shafei S. Psychopathology of skin psychosomatic disorders. Skin Pharmacol 2003; 3(1): Bloomquist ML. Coping skills with maladaptive child, 1st ed, ehran, Sana Publication 2004; pp: [in Persian] 19. Beena J. Behaviour problem in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006; 2(1): Smith GR, Rost K, Kashner M. A trial of the effect of a standardized psychiatric consultation on health outcomes and costs in somatizing patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry1995; 52(3): Mullins LL, Olson RA. Familial factors in the etiology, maintenance, and treatment of somatoform disorders in children. Fam Syst Med 1990; 8(1): Campo JV, Fritz G. A management model for pediatric somatization. Psychosomatics 2001; 42(6): Sanders MR. riple p positive parenting program: A population approach to promoting competent parenting. Australian e Journal for the advancement of Mental Health (AejAm) 2003; 3(2):

6 he Effects of the riple P-Positive Parenting Program on J Babol Univ Med Sci; 11(2); Jun- Jul 2009 ; E. Pourahmadi, et al 24. Sanders MR, Pidgeon AM, Gravesock F, Connors MD, Brown S, Young RW. Dose parental attributional retraining and anger management enhance the effects of triple p-positive parenting program with parents at risk of child maltreatment. Behav her 2004; 35(3): Dean C, Myers K, Evants E. Communicating wide implementation of parenting program: he South East Sydney positive parenting program. AejAMH 2003; 3(1): Sanders MR, urner KM, Markei Dadds C. he development and dissemination of the triple p-positive parenting program: A multilevel evidence based system of parenting and family support. Prev Sci 2002; 3(3): Sanders MR, Markie Dadds C, ully LA, Bor W. he triple p-positive parenting program: A comparison of enhanced, standard, and self -directed behavior family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68(4): Minaee A. Psychometric properties of Ashtenbakh system of empirically based assessment. 2nd ed, ehran, Exceptional Child Education Publication 2005; pp: [in Persian] 29. Sanders MR, Shepherd RW, Cleghorn G, Woolford H. he treatment of recurrent abdominal pain in children: a controlled comparison of cognitive-behavioral family intervention and standard pediatric care. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62(2): Larsson BS. Behavioral treatment of somatic disorders in children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr 1992; 1: Scahill L, Sukhodolsky DG, Bearss KL, et al. Randomized trial of parent management training in children with tic disorders and disruptive behavior. J Child Neurol 2006; 21(8): Lester P, Stein JA, Bursch B. Developmental predictors of somatic symptoms in adolescents of parents with HIV: A 12-month follow-up. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003; 24(4): Nielsen B, Vikan A, Dahl AA. Parenting related to child and parental psychopathology. J Clin Child Psychol 2002; 4(8):

7 his document was created with Win2PDF available at he unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only.

Downloaded from umj.umsu.ac.ir at 20: on Friday March 22nd

Downloaded from umj.umsu.ac.ir at 20: on Friday March 22nd - 1393/01/31 1392/11/20 - :. () : ( ). - -. ( ).(P