Roles of distinct glutamate receptors in induction of anti-hebbian long-term potentiation

Transcription

1 J Physiol (2008) pp SYMPOSIUM REPORT Roles of distinct glutamate receptors in induction of anti-hebbian long-term potentiation Dimitri M. Kullmann 1 and Karri Lamsa 2 1 UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK 2 Department of Pharmacology, Oxford University, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3QT, UK Many glutamatergic synapses on interneurons involved in feedback inhibition in the CA1 region of the hippocampus exhibit an unusual form of long-term potentiation (LTP) that is induced only if presynaptic glutamate release occurs when the postsynaptic membrane potential is relatively hyperpolarized. We have named this phenomenon anti-hebbian LTP because it is prevented by postsynaptic depolarization during afferent activity, and hence its induction requirements are opposite to those of Hebbian NMDA receptor-dependent LTP. This symposium report addresses the roles of distinct glutamate receptors in the induction of anti-hebbian LTP. Inwardly rectifying Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptors mediate fast glutamatergic signalling at synapses that exhibit this form of LTP, and they are highly likely to mediate the instructive signal that triggers the cascade leading to synapse strengthening. NMDA receptors, on the other hand, play no role, nor do they contribute substantially to synaptic transmission at synapses that exhibit anti-hebbian LTP. Both kainate and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors are abundant in at least some interneurons in the feedback inhibitory circuit. Delineating the roles of kainate receptors has been hampered by sub-optimal pharmacological tools. As for group I metabotropic glutamate receptors, their role in anti-hebbian LTP is permissive at the very least in some interneuron types, although an instructive role has been suggested in other forms of activity-dependent plasticity. (Received 9 November 2007; accepted after revision 28 December 2007; first published online 10 January 2008) Corresponding author D. M. Kullmann: UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. d.kullmann@ion.ucl.ac.uk LTP has attracted intense interest for over three decades, not least because it remains the leading candidate mechanism for memory encoding. Four important advances provide compelling justification for the substantial effort devoted to this phenomenon. The first advance actually pre-dates the discovery of LTP, and comes from the theoretical argument put forward by Donald Hebb in the 1940s that networks of idealized neurons could store information if the connections between them obeyed a simple rule (Hebb, 1949). This rule can be approximated by the maxim cells that fire together wire together. The second advance is the discovery that LTP induction in principal cells is essentially Hebbian, because it is triggered by the conjunction of presynaptic glutamate release with postsynaptic depolarization (Wigstrom & Gustafsson, 1986). The third This report was presented at The Journal of Physiology Symposium on Synaptic Plasticity, San Diego, CA, USA, 2 November It was commissioned by the Editorial Board and reflects the views of the author. is the discovery that N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors are necessary for LTP induction in principal cells (Collingridge et al. 1983) and the fourth is the finding that some behavioural tests of memory function are profoundly disrupted by NMDA receptor blockers (Morris, 1989). At a mechanistic level, these observations are united by the fact that NMDA receptors themselves act as coincidence detectors, because they are normally blocked by extracellular Mg 2+ in a voltage-dependent manner (Nowak et al. 1984), and only respond to presynaptic glutamate release when the neuron is depolarized. Although many questions remain, the link from Hebbian NMDA receptor-dependent LTP to memory encoding is one of the most compelling achievements of late 20th century neuroscience. Nevertheless, LTP is not monolithic, and there are many convincing reports describing other forms of long-lasting activity-dependent plasticity of synaptic transmission, which differ with respect to the type of transmission being altered (GABAergic, for instance Caillard et al. 1999), or the sign of the change (depression instead of DOI: /jphysiol

2 1482 D. M. Kullmann and K. Lamsa J Physiol potentiation Dudek & Bear, 1992). Other forms of plasticity result in qualitative rather than quantitative changes in transmission, such as alterations in the molecular and pharmacological identity of receptors at the synapse (Liu & Cull-Candy, 2000). We have recently added to this list by describing a strengthening of glutamatergic synaptic transmission that comes about not as a consequence of pairing pre- with postsynaptic activity, but by the conjunction of presynaptic activity with postsynaptic quiescence (Lamsa et al. 2007). More precisely, this form of LTP can be induced by deliberately hyperpolarizing the postsynaptic neuron via a recording pipette at the same time as the presynaptic glutamatergic axons are made to fire. Alternatively, it can be induced without manipulation of the postsynaptic voltage, by evoking brief bursts of activity in presynaptic axons at an intensity that is insufficient to depolarize the postsynaptic neuron by more than a few millivolts from rest. Although the exact dependence of induction on postsynaptic voltage has yet to be mapped out, the striking feature of this form of LTP is that postsynaptic depolarization prevents its induction, and none of the conventional Hebbian induction protocols result in potentiation at the same synapses. We have therefore termed LTP resulting from the conjunction of presynaptic activity with relative postsynaptic hyperpolarization anti-hebbian. We have recently reviewed much of the phenomenology of anti-hebbian LTP, its likely expression mechanisms, its possible computational significance, and the reasons why (in our opinion) it has been overlooked by others (Kullmann & Lamsa, 2007). Briefly (i) it can be induced in several classes of interneurons in strata oriens and pyramidale by high- or low-frequency stimulation patterns applied to axon collaterals of local pyramidal neurons, as long as the postsynaptic membrane potential is kept negative to the action potential threshold (whether firing itself is the key determinant of plasticity remains to be determined); (ii) it appears to be expressed presynaptically; (iii) it may contribute to shaping the temporal structure of information flow through the hippocampal circuitry; and (iv), it is very difficult to induce in the whole-cell recording configuration of the patch-clamp method (presumably because of rapid wash-out of as-yet undetermined cytosolic substances), and its anti-hebbian nature depends critically on cytoplasmic polyamines, which are frequently omitted from pipette solutions. This report focuses instead on the roles of different glutamate receptors in the induction of anti-hebbian LTP. NMDA receptors Of the ionotropic receptors, a role for NMDA receptors can be discounted on three grounds. First, the requirement for postsynaptic hyperpolarization is precisely opposite to the conditions needed to relieve the Mg 2+ block of these receptors; second, anti-hebbian LTP can be induced by pairing high-frequency tetanization of local axon collaterals with postsynaptic hyperpolarization in the presence of NMDA receptor blockers; and third, when cells exhibiting anti-hebbian LTP were re-patched in whole-cell voltage-clamp mode, the NMDA receptor-mediated component of transmission was uniformly small (Lamsa et al. 2007). Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptors Activation of Ca 2+ -permeable α-amino-3-hydroxy- 5-methylisoxazole propionic acid (CP-AMPA) receptors, on the other hand, is extremely likely to play an instructive role in anti-hebbian LTP. By instructive we mean that activation of these postsynaptic receptors is a necessary link between the induction stimulus (pairing of presynaptic activity and relative postsynaptic hyperpolarization) and LTP. This level of implication is analogous to that ascribed to NMDA receptors in Hebbian LTP, and is greater than a permissive role, which would simply state that the signalling mechanism needs to be constitutively active to allow another cascade to trigger LTP induction. What is the evidence that CP-AMPA receptors play such a privileged role? First is the fact that the Ca 2+ permeability and voltage dependence of CP-AMPA receptors make them an obvious candidate: they show pronounced inward rectification because they are blocked by polyamines upon depolarization, reducing Ca 2+ influx much more than expected from a simple decrease in driving force (Bowie & Mayer, 1995; Donevan & Rogawski, 1995; Kamboj et al. 1995; Koh et al. 1995). Second, in all cases where we have been able to induce anti-hebbian LTP and subsequently re-patch the interneuron in voltage-clamp mode with a spermine-containing pipette solution, the evoked fast synaptic currents have shown steep inward rectification (Lamsa et al. 2007). Conversely, where anti-hebbian LTP could not be induced, the AMPA receptor-mediated component has often (although not always) shown a relatively linear current voltage relation, implying that the AMPA receptors were Ca 2+ impermeable. Third, blocking AMPA receptors with the broad-spectrum antagonist 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline- 2,3-dione (NBQX) prior to application of an anti-hebbian pairing protocol uniformly abolished LTP, as evidenced by the equivalent recovery of transmission in test and control pathways following wash-out of NBQX (Fig. 1). Fourth, the voltage dependence of LTP induction was radically altered when rectification of CP-AMPA receptors was removed. We showed this by, initially, identifying interneurons competent to exhibit anti-hebbian LTP by pairing one pathway with hyperpolarization. Subsequently, we re-patched the cells in whole-cell mode with a polyamine-free pipette solution, and showed that high-frequency stimulation of another pathway

3 J Physiol Anti-Hebbian long-term potentiation 1483 led to potentiation when the cell was held at a positive membrane potential. In contrast, if the cell was re-patched with a polyamine-containing solution, the anti-hebbian voltage dependence of LTP induction in the second pathway was maintained. Nevertheless, the evidence that activation of CP-AMPA receptors have such a privileged role is not complete. It remains to be shown that their activation is sufficient to induce LTP, for instance by applying exogenous agonists in the absence of presynaptic exocytosis. Moreover, there remains considerable uncertainty about the steepness with which depolarization shuts off Ca 2+ influx via CP-AMPA receptors. Some of this uncertainty hinges on the natural concentration of polyamines in the cytoplasm, which may even be dynamically regulated (Aizenman et al. 2002). The polyamine sensitivity of CP-AMPA receptors has also recently been shown to depend not only on their subunit composition but also on their interactions with trans-membrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs Soto et al. 2007). A potential problem for the hypothesis that rectification of CP-AMPA receptors is necessary and sufficient to make LTP anti-hebbian comes from the finding that polyamine blockade can be attenuated by repetitive synaptic activity (Rozov & Burnashev, 1999). How then can high-frequency presynaptic tetani, which we showed to be a powerful tool to induce LTP when paired with hyperpolarization, fail to cause substantial Ca 2+ influx via CP-AMPA receptors when the postsynaptic neuron is depolarized? A possible explanation is that activity-dependent relief of polyamine-dependent rectification itself requires hyperpolarization (Bowie et al. 1998; Rozov et al. 1998). Thus, if the interneuron is already depolarized when presynaptic axons fire, the receptors may remain blocked. Ultimately it will be important to measure activity-dependent Ca 2+ influx at different membrane potentials at synapses where anti-hebbian LTP can be induced. This is far from trivial, because the success rate for evoking LTP rapidly diminishes when recording in whole-cell mode, and so conventional methods to introduce Ca 2+ indicators and manipulate the membrane potential cannot easily be applied. The precise shape of the dependence of synaptic strengthening on Ca 2+ entry during pairing also remains to be determined. If it is highly non-linear (as is probably the case for NMDA receptor-dependent plasticity Perkel et al. 1993), this too could potentially explain why baseline low-frequency activity does not entrain the LTP cascade. Kainate receptors The roles of kainate receptors in brain function remain unclear. Although these receptors are expressed abundantly, and depolarize interneurons particularly powerfully, they only seem to respond to glutamate released from excitatory axons when these fire intensely. Several reports describe a small, slow kainate receptormediated component to glutamatergic transmission at various synapses in response to brief high-frequency bursts of stimuli (Castillo et al. 1997; Vignes & Collingridge, 1997; Frerking et al. 1998; Mulle et al. 2000). The slow kinetics remain difficult to reconcile with studies of either native or heterologously expressed kainate receptors in response to application of agonists, which show kinetics similar to those of AMPA receptors. Kainate receptors are also present presynaptically, and roles for these receptors in heterosynaptic interactions or even as autoreceptors have been proposed (Kullmann, 2001). Recently, Cossart and co-workers have reported that relatively fast kainate receptor-mediated spontaneous action-potential-independent excitatory signals can be detected in interneurons (Cossart et al. 2002), in Figure 1. Anti-Hebbian LTP is abolished by blocking AMPA/kainate receptors The mean EPSP slope in 7 interneurons (± S.E.M.) is plotted against time. The AMPA/kainate blocker NBQX was applied at the time indicated by the horizontal grey bar. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was applied to one pathway ( ) at time 0. Upon wash-out, the paired pathway recovered no faster than the unpaired control pathway ( ). Insets (left to right): schematic showing the arrangement of stimulating and recording electrodes; sample voltage trace showing that current injection via the recording pipette was successful in hyperpolarizing the cell body to 90 mv during tetanization; traces before (blue) and after (red) tetanization in the two pathways. Reproduced with permission from Lamsa et al. (2007).

4 1484 D. M. Kullmann and K. Lamsa J Physiol particular in oriens-lacunosum moleculare (O-LM) cells (Goldin et al. 2007). These interneurons lie in stratum oriens, receive glutamatergic innervation mostly from local pyramidal cells via dendrites running in strata oriens and alveus, and innervate the apical dendrites of pyramidal cells in stratum lacunosum-moleculare (Blasco-Ibanez & Freund, 1995). They are the most abundant neurons where we have reported anti-hebbian LTP (Lamsa et al. 2007). Kainate receptors, in common with AMPA receptors, can be Ca 2+ permeable and inwardly rectifying, depending on their subunit composition and degree of post-transcriptional editing (Bernard et al. 1999; Bleakman, 1999; Lerma et al. 2001). This raises the question whether Ca 2+ -permeable kainate receptors play a role in anti-hebbian LTP induction. We have recently addressed this by applying a lower concentration of NBQX, which, at 1 μm, is relatively selective for AMPA receptors (Bureau et al. 1999). When the anti-hebbian LTP induction protocol was applied to one pathway in the presence of NBQX, no potentiation emerged when comparing to an un-conditioned pathway after washing out the blocker (Oren I, Somogyi P, Nissen W, Kullmann DM & Lamsa K, unpublished observations). Conversely, when the protocol was applied in the presence of the highly selective GluR5-subtype-specific kainate receptor blocker UBP-302, LTP was readily elicited. A similar test for the role of GluR6-containing receptors, which have also been reported in interneurons (Mulle et al. 2000; Paternain et al. 2000), is hampered by the lack of specific blockers. Nevertheless, overall the results argue that CP-AMPA, but not kainate, receptors are necessary for anti-hebbian LTP induction. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors What about group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mglur1 and mglur5)? mglur1 is abundantly expressed in O-LM cells (Baude et al. 1993), although is not uniformly prominent in other types of interneurons that exhibit anti-hebbian LTP, some of which also occur in stratum pyramidale (Lujan et al. 1996; Ferraguti et al. 2004). When both mglur1 and mglur5 were blocked pharmacologically, anti-hebbian LTP could not be induced in a small sample of interneurons in stratum oriens with proximal dendrites running in the plane of the strata, and which may have included some O-LM cells (Lamsa et al. 2007). What does this mean for the role of mglurs in anti-hebbian LTP induction? It is highly unlikely that they can account for the anti-hebbian nature of LTP, because, in contrast to CP-AMPA receptors, they are not thought to be voltage dependent. Are they therefore merely permissive? Group I mglurs tend to occur in a perisynaptic annulus (Lujan et al. 1996), and so their occupancy is generally thought to be enhanced by intense glutamate release such as occurs with high-frequency presynaptic activity. Although pairing postsynaptic hyperpolarization with presynaptic tetanic stimulation is a highly effective anti-hebbian LTP induction protocol, it can also be induced by pairing hyperpolarization with low-frequency stimulation at 5 Hz (Lamsa et al. 2007). Whether the occupancy of group I mglurs is elevated substantially above baseline with 5 Hz stimulation is a matter of speculation. Further work is also required to understand whether blocking mglur1 or mglur5 individually has other effects on the induction of anti-hebbian LTP induction. Group I mglurs may have a more prominent role in another form of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity that has been studied extensively by Lacaille and co-workers in interneurons in stratum oriens, including O-LM cells. This is induced by repetitive pairing of bursts of highfrequency presynaptic stimulation with brief postsynaptic depolarization, and is therefore arguably Hebbian (Perez et al. 2001). Hebbian LTP in these neurons is independent of NMDA receptors and is prevented by selective blockade of mglur1. Although this, on its own, only argues for a permissive role of mglur1, Lacaille and co-workers have gone further to show that exogenous activation of the receptors induces Ca 2+ elevations that are accentuated by depolarization, through an indirect cascade involving transient receptor potential channels and intracellular Ca 2+ stores, and which also interact with Ca 2+ influx via CP-AMPA receptors (Topolnik et al. 2005, 2006). The relationship between Hebbian mglur-dependent LTP and anti-hebbian LTP remains to be elucidated. The finding that Ca 2+ influx with weak presynaptic stimulation principally evokes Ca 2+ via CP-AMPA receptors, while strong stimulation engages an mglur1-linked cascade (Topolnik et al. 2005), suggests that either the anti- Hebbian or the Hebbian form of LTP might be induced in the same cell depending on the pattern of activity in presynaptic axons. Both of these forms of NMDA receptor-independent LTP appear to be expressed presynaptically (Perez et al. 2001; Lapointe et al. 2004; Lamsa et al. 2007), implying that the induction mechanisms converge on the same cascade. Conclusion An instructive role for Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptors in anti-hebbian LTP is supported by abundant evidence. Indeed, this form of use-dependent plasticity provides a teleological explanation for why these receptors should have evolved to allow Ca 2+ influx preferentially at hyperpolarized voltages. Of course, this is not the only role for these receptors, since they have been implicated in other forms of synaptic plasticity (Isaac et al. 2007), as well as contributing to neuronal death in response to various insults (Pellegrini-Giampietro et al. 1997), although the latter is arguably a counter-adaptive phenomenon. Neither

5 J Physiol Anti-Hebbian long-term potentiation 1485 NMDA receptors nor kainate receptors appear to be necessary for anti-hebbian LTP induction. As for group I mglurs, their roles require further work: they are at least permissive in O-LM cells, but they may have additional roles in this and other forms of LTP in interneurons. References Aizenman CD, Munoz-Elias G & Cline HT (2002). Visually driven modulation of glutamatergic synaptic transmission is mediated by the regulation of intracellular polyamines. Neuron 34, Baude A, Nusser Z, Roberts JD, Mulvihill E, McIlhinney RA & Somogyi P (1993). The metabotropic glutamate receptor (mglur1α) is concentrated at perisynaptic membrane of neuronal subpopulations as detected by immunogold reaction. Neuron 11, Bernard A, Ferhat L, Dessi F, Charton G, Represa A, Ben-Ari Y & Khrestchatisky M (1999). Q/R editing of the rat GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptors in vivo and in vitro: evidence for independent developmental, pathological and cellular regulation. EurJNeurosci11, Blasco-Ibanez JM & Freund TF (1995). Synaptic input of horizontal interneurons in stratum oriens of the hippocampal CA1 subfield: structural basis of feed-back activation.eur J Neurosci 7, Bleakman D (1999). Kainate receptor pharmacology and physiology. Cell Mol Life Sci 56, Bowie D, Lange GD & Mayer ML (1998). Activity-dependent modulation of glutamate receptors by polyamines. JNeurosci 18, Bowie D & Mayer ML (1995). Inward rectification of both AMPA and kainate subtype glutamate receptors generated by polyamine-mediated ion channel block. Neuron 15, Bureau I, Bischoff S, Heinemann SF & Mulle C (1999). Kainate receptor-mediated responses in the CA1 field of wild-type and GluR6-deficient mice. JNeurosci19, Caillard O, Ben-Ari Y & Gaiarsa JL (1999). Long-term potentiation of GABAergic synaptic transmission in neonatal rat hippocampus. J Physiol 518, Castillo PE, Malenka RC & Nicoll RA (1997). Kainate receptors mediate a slow postsynaptic current in hippocampal CA3 neurons. Nature 388, Collingridge GL, Kehl SJ & McLennan H (1983). Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 334, Cossart R, Epsztein J, Tyzio R, Becq H, Hirsch J, Ben-Ari Y & Crepel V (2002). Quantal release of glutamate generates pure kainate and mixed AMPA/kainate EPSCs in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 35, Donevan SD & Rogawski MA (1995). Intracellular polyamines mediate inward rectification of Ca 2+ -permeable α-amino- 3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, Dudek SM & Bear MF (1992). Homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA89, Ferraguti F, Cobden P, Pollard M, Cope D, Shigemoto R, WatanabeM&SomogyiP(2004). Immunolocalization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1α (mglur1α) in distinct classes of interneuron in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus. Hippocampus 14, Frerking M, Malenka RC & Nicoll RA (1998). Synaptic activation of kainate receptors on hippocampal interneurons [see comments]. Nat Neurosci 1, Goldin M, Epsztein J, Jorquera I, Represa A, Ben-Ari Y, Crepel V & Cossart R (2007). Synaptic kainate receptors tune oriens-lacunosum moleculare interneurons to operate at theta frequency. JNeurosci27, Hebb DO (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York. Isaac JT, Ashby M & McBain CJ (2007). The Role of the GluR2 subunit in AMPA receptor function and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 54, Kamboj SK, Swanson GT & Cull-Candy SG (1995). Intracellular spermine confers rectification on rat calciumpermeable AMPA and kainate receptors. J Physiol 486, Koh DS, Burnashev N & Jonas P (1995). Block of native Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptors in rat brain by intracellular polyamines generates double rectification. J Physiol 486, Kullmann DM (2001). Presynaptic kainate receptors in the hippocampus. Slowly emerging from obscurity. Neuron 32, Kullmann DM & Lamsa KP (2007). Long-term synaptic plasticity in hippocampal interneurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 8, Lamsa KP, Heeroma JH, Somogyi P, Rusakov DA & Kullmann DM (2007). Anti-Hebbian long-term potentiation in the hippocampal feedback inhibitory circuit. Science 315, Lapointe V, Morin F, Ratte S, Croce A, Conquet F & Lacaille JC (2004). Synapse-specific mglur1-dependent long-term potentiation in interneurones regulates mouse hippocampal inhibition. J Physiol 555, Lerma J, Paternain AV, Rodriguez-Moreno A & Lopez-Garcia JC (2001). Molecular physiology of kainate receptors. Physiol Rev 81, Liu SQ & Cull-Candy SG (2000). Synaptic activity at calcium-permeable AMPA receptors induces a switch in receptor subtype. Nature 405, Lujan R, Nusser Z, Roberts JD, Shigemoto R & Somogyi P (1996). Perisynaptic location of metabotropic glutamate receptors mglur1 and mglur5 on dendrites and dendritic spines in the rat hippocampus. EurJNeurosci8, Morris RG (1989). Synaptic plasticity and learning: selective impairment of learning rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist AP5. JNeurosci9, Mulle C, Sailer A, Swanson GT, Brana C, O Gorman S, Bettler B & Heinemann SF (2000). Subunit composition of kainate receptors in hippocampal interneurons. Neuron 28, Nowak L, Bregestovski P, Ascher P, Herbet A & Prochiantz A (1984). Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature 307,

6 1486 D. M. Kullmann and K. Lamsa J Physiol Paternain AV, Herrera MT, Nieto MA & Lerma J (2000). GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptor subunits coexist in hippocampal neurons and coassemble to form functional receptors. JNeurosci20, Pellegrini-Giampietro DE, Gorter JA, Bennett MV & Zukin RS (1997). The GluR2 (GluR-B) hypothesis: Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptors in neurological disorders. Trends Neurosci 20, Perez Y, Morin F & Lacaille JC (2001). A hebbian form of long-term potentiation dependent on mglur1a in hippocampal inhibitory interneurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, Perkel DJ, Petrozzino JJ, Nicoll RA & Connor JA (1993). The role of Ca 2+ entry via synaptically activated NMDA receptors in the induction of long-term potentiation. Neuron 11, Rozov A & Burnashev N (1999). Polyamine-dependent facilitation of postsynaptic AMPA receptors counteracts paired-pulse depression. Nature 401, Rozov A, Zilberter Y, Wollmuth LP & Burnashev N (1998). Facilitation of currents through rat Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptor channels by activity-dependent relief from polyamine block. J Physiol 511, Soto D, Coombs ID, Kelly L, Farrant M & Cull-Candy SG (2007). Stargazin attenuates intracellular polyamine block of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors. Nat Neurosci 10, Topolnik L, Azzi M, Morin F, Kougioumoutzakis A & Lacaille JC (2006). mglur1/5 subtype-specific calcium signalling and induction of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal oriens/alveus interneurones. J Physiol 575, Topolnik L, CongarP&Lacaille JC (2005). Differential regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor- and AMPA receptor-mediated dendritic Ca 2+ signals by presynaptic and postsynaptic activity in hippocampal interneurons. JNeurosci25, Vignes M & Collingridge GL (1997). The synaptic activation of kainate receptors. Nature 388, Wigstrom H & Gustafsson B (1986). Postsynaptic control of hippocampal long-term potentiation. J Physiol 81, Acknowledgements Work in the authors laboratories is supported by the Wellcome Trust and MRC. We are indebted to I. Oren for comments on the manuscript.