Adam H. Deming, Psy.D. Liberty Behavioral Health Corp. James Basinger, Indiana Department of Correction Keith Butts, GEO Group

Transcription

1 THE INDIANA DOC S INSOMM PROGRAM: LESSONS LEARNED FROM 15 YEARS OF TREATING AND SUPERVISING SEX OFFENDERS American Correctional Association January 25, 2016 New Orleans, LA Adam H. Deming, Psy.D. Liberty Behavioral Health Corp. James Basinger, Indiana Department of Correction Keith Butts, GEO Group

2 OVERVIEW Take Home Messages History and Implementation of the INSOMM Maximizing Program Participation and Completion Recidivism Risk Assessment Risk Based Treatment Sex Offender Specific Re-Entry and Community Management Quality Improvement and Research Legal Challenges

3 TAKE HOME MESSAGES An integrated system of services is vital with this population Make open communication and sharing of information between service providers a priority Use of best practices and where possible EBP s Educate of stakeholders at all levels, top to bottom Do not be afraid to learn from mistakes A quality assurance program is a necessary component of a great program

4 THE INSOMM PROGRAM - HISTORY Implemented in 1999 by the Indiana Department of Correction Under private contract with Liberty Behavioral Health since 1999 INSOMM Program Services Include: Prison Based Sex Offender Treatment Sex Offender Specific Re-Entry Services Community Based Treatment and Monitoring Training to Multiple Stakeholders Quality Assurance/Annual Recidivism Study.

5 THE INSOMM PROGRAM Phase I Assessment Phase II Facility Based Sex Offender Specific Treatment and Re-Entry Phase III Community Management and Monitoring of Paroled Sexual Offenders Quality Assurance and Improvement Training and Education

6 MAXIMIZING PROGRAM PARTICIPATION In 2006, the Indiana legislature passed statute that allows the Indiana DOC to provide consequences to those persons convicted of a sex crime that refuse to participate in sex offender treatment during incarceration. Allows for Code 116 violation. If found guilty, allows for the demotion in credit class, loss of gain time, and loss of visitation Has had a significant impact on treatment participation. Exceptions Temporary Exemption from Treatment due to Ongoing Appeal or Post Conviction Relief.

7 MAXIMIZING PROGRAM PARTICIPATION Overall philosophy of program also impacts participation Where possible program should communicate the positive impact of participation in treatment. Program should reinforce participation, and only utilize sanctions as a last resort.

8 LESSONS LEARNED If your jurisdiction has a clear need for these services, lobby important decision makers to make it happen An integrated program that includes prison based treatment and re-entry, community treatment and supervision, quality improvement and research, and training is the most effective and efficient manner to treat and manage this population Getting the legislature to pass statute that allows the DOC to consequence program refusers should be a priority

9 NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY GENERAL POPULATION 2403 STATE OF INDIANA DESIGNATED SEX OFFENDER TREATMENT COMPOUND

10 OFFENDER CHARACTERISTICS More socially prominent positions in the community (doctors, teachers, ministers) More compliant Less violent Generally more educated

11 CORRECTIONAL STAFF RESPONSES Personal bias/prejudice Name-calling Irrational fear LGBT issues Complacency due to perception of severity of crime or lackadaisical approach to enforcing rules

12 EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT

13 MINOR VISITATION Sex offenses are often the culmination of longer term grooming behaviors toward the potential victim. In Indiana, sex offenders are automatically precluded from visiting with minors (under 18). Potential for a waiver/exception if Victim of committing offense not minor No record of multiple victims Crime committed without force (including drugs/alcohol)

14 RESPONSES Family Response Confusion Anger Will not take no for an answer Offender Response Will not take no for an answer Attempt to manipulate for visits or communication (J-pay, letters, and visits)

15 OFFENDER STATISTICS General Population Child Molesting 84% Sexual Misconduct with Minor 29% Rape 13% Criminal Deviate Conduct 10% Burglary 7%* Burglary identified as pre-cursor to rape/sexual assault crime.

16 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Public relations challenge to gain/maintain a positive image and assure community of safety/ security Justifying opportunities to rehabilitate due to community perception of category of crimes Exaggerated media portrayals of prison operations ( reality shows) Dramatized television portrayals of criminal activity

17 THE INSOMM PROGRAM Phase I Assessment Static 99R Risk Assessment/JSORRAT (Juveniles) Stable 2010 Dynamic Risk Assessment Psychosexual Interview Polygraph Assessment Penile Plethysmograph (PPG)

18 RISK ASSESSMENT Fact: Not All Sex Offenders Are Equally Dangerous Significant Risk Differences Exist Among Sex Offenders Sex Offenders Are A Very Heterogeneous Group. Sex Offense Recidivism Risk Factors (Hanson, 2000) Correlation Sexual Deviance -PPG.32 Deviant Sexual Preference.22 Prior Sexual Offenses.19 Treatment Dropout.17

19 RISK ASSESSMENT Other Risk Factors Male Victims (Hanson et. al., 2003) Unrelated Victims (Hanson et. al., 2003) Victims From Multiple Age Groups Substance Abuse/Dependence (d=.12) (Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2004) Psychopathy (d=.29) (Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2004) Factors That Appear to Mitigate Risk Age (over 60?) (Barbaree, et. al., 2003) Successful Completion of Treatment (Hanson, et. al., 2002)

20 RISK BASED TREATMENT Sex Offender Treatment Does Reduce Recidivism Treatment Outcome Studies Several studies (for example, Marshall, et. al., 2005), and metaanalyses (for example, Hanson, et. al., 2002) have demonstrated the effectiveness of sex offender treatment in reducing recidivism. Some debate exists regarding which treatment components are most responsible for the treatment effect (for example, victim empathy and denial?). Research does NOT support the notion that more treatment is better (Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2005), and DOES support the idea that treatment should be tailored to risk level and specific treatment needs (for example, Mailloux et. al., 2003).

21 THE INSOMM PROGRAM Phase II Risked Based Sex Offender Specific Treatment Risk Based Treatment (low, moderate, high) Focus on: Taking Responsibility for Offenses Dynamic Risk Factors for Recidivism Social/Interpersonal Skill Development Sex Offender Thinking Errors Relapse Prevention

22 SEX OFFENDER TREATMENT Best Practice In Sex Offender Treatment Sex Offender Specific Risk Based Treatment Group Therapy Good Lives Model Relapse Prevention Sex Offender Specific Thinking Errors Arousal Management and Reconditioning Sex Offender Related Treatment Social/Interpersonal Skills Training Emotional Management Empathy Development

23 THE INSOMM PROGRAM Phase II Continued Sex Offender Specific Re-Entry Sex Offender Registration Education Parole Stipulation Education Placement and Housing GPS Risk Assessment

24 LESSONS LEARNED For key program positions, hire experienced clinicians that know how to develop programing, and that can motivate and manage people competently Use assessment to guide treatment programming Use best practices, and where possible EBP s. Sex offender specific re-entry is vital

25 THE INSOMM PROGRAM Phase III Community Management and Monitoring Containment Model Parole Agent District Re-Entry and Resource Coordinators INSOMM Program Network Treatment Providers Credentialing and Auditing INSOMM Program Network Polygraph Examiners Credentialing and Auditing

26 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION Community Treatment and Supervision Should Be Based on an Assessment of: Offender Risk Dynamic risk factors should be assessed every 6 months to 1 year. Offender Need Offender Responsiveness to Interventions and Supervision

27 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION Best Practice in Community Sex Offender Management Risk based supervision Polygraph examination No evidence to support the effectiveness of residency restrictions GPS Research is ongoing

28 LESSONS LEARNED Risk based supervision Parole/probation usually can not manage the supervision process on their own, and need managers/coordinators to assist Develop a network of credentialed providers Develop a team (containment model) Communication among team

29 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND RESEARCH Monthly, Quarterly, and Annual Utilization Data Annual Recidivism Study Internal Audits of Program Deliverables and Scope of Services Auditing of Credentialed Community Treatment Providers and Polygraph Examiners Annual Satisfaction Surveys

30

31

32 LESSONS LEARNED Must regularly assess the scope of the program, the manner of delivering services, and program utilization (performance indicators) Must look at program outcomes such as recidivism rates Recidivism research should include both aggregate and within 3 years of release Audit and maintain strong working relationships with community providers

33 LEGAL CHALLENGES Mandatory treatment within the DOC Treatment requirement that offender takes responsibility for sexual offenses Visitation with children in the community Parole stipulations

34 LESSONS LEARNED Work with and educate DOC counsel and AG s office Hold your ground on the big issues and update/make changes on the small issues that improve program specificity Train staff to know and follow policies and procedures

35 CONTACT INFORMATION Adam Deming, Psy.D. James Basinger 440 N. Meridian Street 302 W. Washington St. Suite 220 E334, IGC South Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana Keith Butts New Castle Correctional Facility New Castle, Indiana

36 REFERENCES Barbaree, H.E., Blanchard, R., & Langton, C.M. (2003). The development of sexual aggression through the life span: The effect of age on sexual arousal and recidivism among sex offenders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, Birgden, A. (2004). Therapeutic jurisprudence and sex offenders: A psycho-legal approach to protection. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, Hanson, R.K. (2000). Risk Assessment. Beaverton, Oregon: Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.

37 REFERENCES Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting Relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, Hanson, R.K., Gordon, A., Harris, A.J.R., Marques, J.K., Murphy, W.D., Quinsey, V.L., & Seto, M.C. (2002). First report of the Collaborative Outcome Data Project on the Effectiveness of Psychological Treatment of Sex Offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, Hanson, R.K. & Harris, A. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple Question. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.

38 REFERENCES Hanson, R.K. & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictions of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services. Hanson, R.K. & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A metaanalysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, Hanson, R.K., Morton, K.E., & Harris, A.J.R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 898,

39 REFERENCES Mailloux, D.L., Abracen, J., Serin, R., Cousineau, C., Malcom, B., & Looman, J. (2003). Dosage of treatment to sex offenders: Are we over-prescribing? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(2), Marshall, W.L., Marshall, L.E., Malcom, P.B., Serran, G.A., & Fernandez, Y.M. (2005). Outcome evaluation of a sexual offenders treatment program. Manuscript in preparation. Prentky, R.A., Lee, A.F.S., Knight, R.A., & Cerce, D. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 21,