THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TISSUE DOPPLER PARAMETERS AND SERIC NTPROBNP LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION

Similar documents
Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is. Original Research

Jong-Won Ha*, Jeong-Ah Ahn, Jae-Yun Moon, Hye-Sun Suh, Seok-Min Kang, Se-Joong Rim, Yangsoo Jang, Namsik Chung, Won-Heum Shim, Seung-Yun Cho

Segmental Tissue Doppler Image-Derived Tei Index in Patients With Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities

Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular (LV)

Effect of Heart Rate on Tissue Doppler Measures of E/E

Left ventricular diastolic function and filling pressure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Μαρία Μπόνου Διευθύντρια ΕΣΥ, ΓΝΑ Λαϊκό

Characteristics of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure: A Doppler Tissue Imaging Study

Conflict of interest: none declared

Value of echocardiography in chronic dyspnea

An Integrated Approach to Study LV Diastolic Function

The Patient with Atrial Fibrilation

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction by Doppler and 2D Speckle-tracking Imaging in Patients with Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

Left Atrial Deformation Predicts Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients

NEW GUIDELINES. A Guideline Protocol for the Echocardiographic assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction

Diagnosis is it really Heart Failure?

Evalua&on)of)Le-)Ventricular)Diastolic) Dysfunc&on)by)Echocardiography:) Role)of)Ejec&on)Frac&on)

Myocardial performance index, Tissue Doppler echocardiography

How to Assess Diastolic Dysfunction?

Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors

Left atrial mechanical function and stiffness in patients with atrial septal aneurysm: A speckle tracking study

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an

Rownak Jahan Tamanna 1, Rowshan Jahan 2, Abduz Zaher 3 and Abdul Kader Akhanda. 3 ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Diastolic Function Overview

i n d i a n h e a r t j o u r n a l 6 8 ( ) Available online at ScienceDirect

E/Ea is NOT an essential estimator of LV filling pressures

Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Myocardial Performance Index in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Articles in PresS. J Appl Physiol (September 29, 2005). doi: /japplphysiol

*Christian M. Carlsen, 1 Mette Mouridsen, 1 Ahmad Sajadieh, 1 Lars Køber, 2 Olav W. Nielsen 1 ABSTRACT BACKGROUND

A New Tissue Doppler Index in Predicting Future Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure

Diastolic Function: What the Sonographer Needs to Know. Echocardiographic Assessment of Diastolic Function: Basic Concepts 2/8/2012

Research Article Changes in Mitral Annular Ascent with Worsening Echocardiographic Parameters of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function

Three-dimensional Wall Motion Tracking:

Title:Relation Between E/e' ratio and NT-proBNP Levels in Elderly Patients with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

Heart Failure in Women: Dr Goh Ping Ping Cardiologist Asian Heart & Vascular Centre

Elevated LV filling pressure is a major determinant of cardiac symptoms and

The importance of left atrium in LV diastolic function

Hemodynamic Assessment. Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics

LV FUNCTION ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS BEYOND EJECTION FRACTION

Pericardial Diseases. Smonporn Boonyaratavej, MD. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Chulalongkorn University

Quantitation of the diastolic stress test: filling pressure vs. diastolic reserve

JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING VOL. 4, NO. 9, PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. DOI: /j.jcmg

Chapter 52 Diastolic Stress Echocardiography

GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR ECHO ASSESSMENT OF DIASTOLIC FUNCTION (For full recommendation refer to the Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Guideline)

Quantitative Assessment of Fetal Ventricular Function:

Appendix II: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY ANALYSIS

In patients with aortic dissection, expansion of the false

Adult Echocardiography Examination Content Outline

Clinical Investigations

Methods. Circ J 2005; 69:

M. Hajahmadi Poorrafsanjani 1 & B. Rahimi Darabad 1

Highlights from EuroEcho 2009 Echo in cardiomyopathies

Basic Approach to the Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Diastolic Function

Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients Showing Diastolic Dysfunction without Overt Symptoms of Heart Failure

OPTIMIZING ECHO ACQUISTION FOR STRAIN AND DIASTOLOGY

LV geometric and functional changes in VHD: How to assess? Mi-Seung Shin M.D., Ph.D. Gachon University Gil Hospital

Imaging in Heart Failure: A Multimodality Approach. Thomas Ryan, MD

좌심실수축기능평가 Cardiac Function

Quantitation of right ventricular dimensions and function

The study of left ventricular diastolic function by Doppler echocardiography: the essential for the clinician

Echocardiographic and Doppler Assessment of Cardiac Functions in Patients of Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

PROSTHETIC VALVE BOARD REVIEW

Prediction of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Left Atrial Size Is Volume Superior to Area or Diameter?

Left atrial function. Aliakbar Arvandi MD

Adel Hasanin Ahmed 1

Diastolic Function Assessment Practical Ways to Incorporate into Every Echo

THE PHARMA INNOVATION - JOURNAL Tei Index: Assessment of the Myocardial Function of the Left Ventricle in Case of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Mechanisms of heart failure with normal EF Arterial stiffness and ventricular-arterial coupling. What is the pathophysiology at presentation?

P atients with heart disease frequently have abnormalities

Advanced imaging of the left atrium - strain, CT, 3D, MRI -

Global left ventricular circumferential strain is a marker for both systolic and diastolic myocardial function

Diastolic Function Assessment New Guideline Update Practical Approach

Peak Early Diastolic Mitral Annulus Velocity by Tissue Doppler Imaging Adds Independent and Incremental Prognostic Value

Objectives. Diastology: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. LV Diastolic Function: Introduction. LV Diastolic Function: Introduction

Echocardiographically estimated left ventricular end-diastolic and right ventricular systolic pressure in normotensive healthy individuals

Aortic Root Dilatation as a Marker of Subclinical Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Cardiovascular Risk Factors

The Impact of Autonomic Neuropathy on Left Ventricular Function in Normotensive Type 1 Diabetic Patients: a Tissue Doppler Echocardiographic Study

Echo-Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Michel Slama Amiens France

Thermal Therapy Improves Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: A Tissue Doppler Echocardiographic

Echocardiography: Guidelines for Valve Quantification

The impact of hypertension on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function. A tissue Doppler echocardiographic study

Mitral annular Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) has

Atrial dyssynchrony syndrome: An overlooked cause of heart failure with normal ejection fraction

Questions on Chamber Quantitation

Diastology State of The Art Assessment

LCZ696 A First-in-Class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor

Valvular Heart Disease. Doppler Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Patients With Mitral Valve Disease

Introduction. In Jeong Cho, MD, Wook Bum Pyun, MD and Gil Ja Shin, MD ABSTRACT

Review of Cardiac Imaging Modalities in the Renal Patient. George Youssef

Tissue Doppler Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease

HFpEF. April 26, 2018

Incorporating the New Echo Guidelines Into Everyday Practice

The Mitral L Wave. A Marker of Advanced Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Improvements in Left Ventricular Diastolic Function After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Are Coupled to Response in Systolic Performance

Echocardiographic Correlates of Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure

Mechanisms of False Positive Exercise Electrocardiography: Is False Positive Test Truly False?

Carlos Eduardo Suaide Silva, Luiz Darcy Cortez Ferreira, Luciana Braz Peixoto, Claudia Gianini Monaco, Manuel Adán Gil, Juarez Ortiz

DOPPLER HEMODYNAMICS (1) QUANTIFICATION OF PRESSURE GRADIENTS and INTRACARDIAC PRESSURES

Right Heart Hemodynamics: Echo-Cath Discrepancies

Tissue Doppler Imaging

Transcription:

ORIGINAL ARTICLES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TISSUE DOPPLER PARAMETERS AND SERIC NTPROBNP LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION Ioanna Zacharopoulou, Cristian Mornos, Adina Ionac, Stefan-Iosif Dragulescu REZUMAT Introducere: Ecocardiografia Doppler tisular (TDI) reprezintă o tehnică nouă care permite determinarea velocităţilor miocardice precum şi ale inelului mitral. Indicele de performanţă miocardică globală determinat prin ecocardiografia Doppler (GMI) este un parametru simplu si neinvaziv de apreciere a funcţiei globale a ventriculului stâng (LV). Acest indice poate fi obţinut şi prin TDI (GMI-TDI). Fragmentul N-terminal al peptidului natriuretic cerebral (NTproBNP) este recunoscut drept un marker acurat de estimare a funcţiei sistolice şi diastolice a LV. Scop: Evaluarea relaţiei dintre diferiţii parametrii TDI şi nivelul seric al NTproBNP la pacienţii prezentând disfuncţie a LV aflaţi în ritm sinusal. Material şi metode: Ecocardiografia convenţională şi TDI s-a efectuat concomitent cu determinarea NTproBNP la 137 pacienţi consecutivi în ritm sinusal prezentând disfuncţie LV. Pacienţii cu fereastră ecocardiografică inadecvată, ritm electrostimulat, valvulopatie mitrală severă, proteză valvulară, boală pericardică, sindrom acut coronarian, pontaj arterial coronarian în ultimele 72 de ore sau insuficienţă renală au fost excluşi. Cei 110 bolnavi rămaşi (vârstă 63 ± 13 ani) au constituit grupul de analizat. Raportul dintre velocitatea maximă diastolică precoce transmitrală (E, utilizând Dopplerul pulsat) şi velocitatea maximă diastolică precoce a inelului mitral (Ea, utilizând TDI), precum şi velocitatea maximă sistolică a inelului mitral din timpul ejecţiei determinată prin TDI (Sa) au fost măsurate; a fost utilizată media velocităţilor septale şi laterale ale inelului mitral. Pornind de la înregistrarea TDI s-au măsurat intervalul de timp dintre diastole (a ) şi durata sistolică a undei Sa (b ). GMI-TDI a fost calculat conform formulei (a - b )/b, atât la nivelul extremităţii septale cât şi laterale a inelului mitral iar media celor două extremităţi a fost ulterior utilizată. Rezultate: Regresia liniară simplă demonstrează o corelaţia semnificativă între GMI-TDI şi NTproBNP (r=0.73, p<0.001). Corelaţii semnificatve statistic inferioare au mai mai fost identificate între NTproBNP şi E/Ea (r=0.56, p<0.001), presiunea sistolică în artera pulmonară (r=0.53, p<0.001), Sa (r= -0.43, p<0.001), E (r=0.33, p=0.001), fracţia de ejecţie a LV (r= -0.26, p=0.006), timpul de decelerare al undei E (r= -0.30, p=0.002) şi unda Ea (r=-0.24, p=0.01). Nu a fost identificată o corelaţie semnificativă statistic în cazul diametrului atriului stâng, suprafaţa atrială stângă sau volumul atrial stâng. Valoarea cut-off optimă a GMI-TDI pentru estimarea unui nivel seric al NTproBNP >900 pg/ml a fost 0.51 (sensibilitate de 82% şi specificitate de 80%) cu o acurateţe de 90%. Concluzie: GMI-TDI are o corelaţie puternică cu nivelul seric al NTproBNP şi poate fi utilizat cu o bună acurateţe pentru estimarea funcţiei LV. Cuvinte cheie: peptid natriuretic, indice de performanţă miocardică globală, velocitatea inelului mitral, ecocardiografie Doppler tisulară ABSTRACT Introduction: Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is a novel echocardiographic technique that permits measurements of mitral annular and myocardial velocities. The global myocardial index determined by the pulsed Doppler method (GMI) is a simple and noninvasive measurement for assessing global left ventricular (LV) function. This index can also be obtained by TDI (GMI-TDI). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) is recognized as a reliable marker of systolic and diastolic LV function. Aim: To assess the relationship between different TDI parameters and NTproBNP levels in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, in sinus rhythm. Material and methods: Conventional echocardiography and TDI were performed simultaneously with NTproBNP determination in 137 consecutive patients with left ventricular dysfunction, in sinus rhythm, referred for echocardiography. Patients with inadequate echocardiographic image, paced rhythm, severe mitral valvular disease, mitral prosthesis, pericardial disease, acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery by-pass within 72 hours or renal failure were excluded. The remaining 110 patients (age 63 ±13 years) formed our study group. Peak early diastolic transmitral velocity (E, using pulsed Doppler) / peak early mitral annular diastolic velocity (Ea, using TDI) ratio and the peak systolic velocity during ejection in TDI of the mitral annulus (Sa) were determined; the average of the velocities from the septal and lateral site of the mitral annulus was used. From TDI recordings, the time interval during diastole (a ) and the duration of the systole Sa-wave (b ) were measured. The GMI-TDI was calculated as (a - b )/b. GMI-TDI was measured at the septal and lateral sites of the mitral annulus, and the average was utilized. Results: Simple regression analysis demonstrated a significant linear correlation between GMI-TDI and NTproBNP (r=0.73, p<0.001). Significant but weaker correlations were found between NTproBNP and E/Ea (r=0.56, p<0.001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r=0.53, p<0.001), Sa (r= -0.43, p<0.001), E wave (r=0.33, p=0.001), LVEF (r= -0.26, p=0.006), mitral E deceleration time (r= -0.30, p=0.002) and Ea (r=-0.24, p=0.01). We couldn t demonstrate significant relationships between NTproBNP and left atrial diameter, left atrial surface or left atrial volume. The optimal GMI-TDI cut-off for prediction of NTproBNP levels >900 pg/ml was 0.51 (sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 80%) with 90% accuracy. Conclusions: GMI-TDI had a good correlation with plasma NTproBNP levels and can be used with good accuracy for the assessment of the LV function. Abbreviations: BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; E = maximal early diastolic transmitral flow velocity; Ea = maximal early mitral annular diastolic velocity; EDD = end-diastolic diameter; EF = ejection fraction; GMI-TDI = Global Myocardial Index assessed by Tissue Doppler Imaging; LA = left atrial; LV = left ventricle; NTproBNP = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; Sa = maximal systolic velocity of mitral annulus; TDI = Tissue Doppler Imaging. Key Words: Natriuretic Peptide, Global Myocardial Index, Mitral Annulus Velocity, Tissue Doppler Imaging Correspondence to: Cristian Mornos, MD, Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Timisoara, Str PP Carp nr 13A, Romania, Tel: +40256207355, Fax +40256207362 Email: mornoscristi@yahoo.com Received for publication: Sep. 07, 2009. Revised: Nov. 16, 2009. INTRODUCTION Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is a novel echocardiographic technique that permits measurements of mitral annular and myocardial velocities. 1 The ratio between early diastolic transmitral velocity (E - measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography) and 268 TMJ 2009, Vol. 59, No. 3-4

early mitral annular diastolic velocity (Ea - measured by pulsed TDI) has been demonstrated to correlate with left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. 1,2 E/Ea is currently used for the noninvasive assessment of LV filling pressure. However, this parameter may be inaccurate in some categories of patients (particularly in patients with E/Ea ratio between 8 and 15). 3 N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) has been used for the noninvasive assessment of LV function. 4 Increased levels of NTproBNP are produced mainly in response to LV wall pressure and volume overload, and invasive studies have demonstrated thet elevated natriuretic peptides correlate well with increased LV filling pressures. 5,6 It is reported that elevated levels of natriuretic peptides are strongly related to symptoms, cardiac events and mortality. 5 A value of <900 pg/ml was recently recommended in the PRIDE study (NTproBNP Investigation of Dyspneea in the Emergency Department) as cut-off to rule out heart failure with 94% negative predictive value. 6,7 The relationship between natriuretic peptides and TDI velocities (Ea, E/Ea) is still subject of debate. 8-10 This study was designed to evaluate the correlation between the different tissue Doppler parameters and the plasma NTproBNP levels in consecutive patients with LV disfunction, in sinus rhythm, referred for echocardiography. to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography, working together with the European Association of Echocardiography. 12 Transmitral flow patterns were recorded from apical four-chamber windows with a 3-5 mm pulsed-sample Doppler volume placed between mitral valve tips in diastole during five consecutive cardiac cycles. Care was taken to obtain the smallest possible angle between the direction of transmitral flow and the ultrasound beam. Mitral inflow measurements (at end expiration) included peak early velocity (E), peak late velocity (A), E/A ratio, and E wave deceleration time. 13 Parameters were recorded for five consecutive cardiac cycles, and results were averaged. Pulsed Doppler signals were recorded at a horizontal sweep of 100 mm/s. Measurement of systolic pulmonary artery pressure was performed using the maximal regurgitant velocity at the tricuspide valve by continous Doppler. 13 MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients We screened 137 consecutive patients with LV dysfunction (according to European Association of Echocardiography/American Society of Echocardiography recommendations), in sinus rhythm, referred for echocardiography. 11 Patients with inadequate echocardiographic image, congenital heart disease, paced rhythm, severe mitral valvular disease, mitral prosthesis, pericardial disease, acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery by-pass within 72 hours or renal failure were excluded. The remaining 110 patients formed our study group. All the patients gave informed consent in agreement with ethics regulations. Echocardiography and Doppler Conventional echocardiography and TDI were performed simultaneously with NTproBNP determination. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examinations were performed with an ultrasonographic system (Vivid 7 General Electric, Milwaukee, WI) equipped with a multifrequency transducer. Two-dimensional and M-mode measurements were performed according Figure 1. Bedside measurements of spectral Doppler peak early transmitral inflow (E) velocity (panel a) and spectral tissue Doppler peak early diastolic (Ea) velocities, respectively peak systolic (Sa) velocities, at the medial (panel b) and lateral (panel c) corners of mitral annulus. The average of the velocities from medial and lateral mitral annulus was used to calculate the E/Ea ratio. Tissue Doppler Measurements The tissue Doppler program was set in pulsedwave Doppler mode. Motion of mitral annulus was recorded in the apical four-chamber view at a frame rate of 80 to 140 frames per second. 14 A 3-5 mm sample volume was positioned sequentially at the lateral and septal corners of the mitral annulus. Two major negative velocities were recorded with the movement of the annulus toward the base of the heart during diastole: one during the early phase of diastole (Ea), and another during the late phase of diastole (Aa). A major positive systolic velocity was recorded with the movement of the annulus toward Ioanna Zacharopoulou et al 269

the cardiac apex during systole. The peak myocardial systolic velocity was defined as the maximum velocity during systole, excluding the isovolumic contraction (Sa). All velocities were recorded for five consecutive cardiac cycles at end expiration, and results were averaged. All tissue Doppler signals were recorded at horizontal time sweep set at 100 mm/s. E/Ea ratio was calculated; the average of the velocities of septal and lateral mitral annulus was used. (Fig. 1) From TDI recordings, the time interval during diastole (a ) and the duration of the systole Sa-wave (b ) were measured. (Fig. 2) The global myocardial index determined by TDI (GMI-TDI) was calculated as (a -b )/b. GMI- TDI was measured at the septal and lateral sites of the mitral annulus, and the average was utilized. 15 All measurements were performed by two experienced echocardiographers blinded to the NTproBNP levels. statistical analyses used the software package SPSS version 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Il, USA). A p value of <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. RESULTS The current study included 110 consecutive patients (mean age: 63 ± 13 years; 52 women) with LV dysfunction, in sinus rhythm, referred for echocardiography. The admitting diagnoses were coronary artery disease (68 patients), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (27 patients), systemic hypertension (10 patients), valvular disease (aortic regurgitation - 4 patients) and ascending aortic aneurysm (one patient). Characteristics of the study group are presented in Table 1. TDI mitral annular velocities were recordable at both sites of the mitral annulus in all patients. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study group [data are presented as mean ± SD or No. (%)]. Figure 2. The global myocardial index determined by Tissue Doppler Imaging (GMI-TDI) defined as the sum of isovolumetric contraction and relaxation durations divided by ejection time and calculated as (a - b )/b ratio (a = the time interval during diastole and b = the duration of the systole Sa-wave). NT-proBNP measurement NT-proBNP levels were measured in blood samples collected by venipuncture into EDTA tubes, within 30 minutes before or after echocardiography. The automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche-Elecsys 2010) was used. 16 The measuring range, defined by the lower detection limit and the maximum of the master curve, provided by the manufacturer was 5 to 35 000 pg/ml. Statistics Data are presented as mean value ± standard variation (SD). Correlation between NTproBNP and echocardiographic parameters was determined by Pearson s correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine optimal sensitivity and specificity. All Characteristics Data Mean age, years 63±13 Female/male gender 52(47) / 58(53) Body mass index, kg/m 2 27 ± 4.6 Heart rate (beats/minute) 73 ± 12 Mean arterial pressure, mmhg 99 ± 12.9 Coronary artery disease 68 (62) Nonischemic cardiomyopathy 27 (24.5) Systemic hypertension 10 (9) Valvular dysfunction 4 (3.6) Ascending aortic aneurysm 1 (0.9) LV ejection fraction 40 ± 14 Ea, cm/s 7.1 ± 2.7 Maximum 21 Minimum 2.7 Sa, cm/s 6.5 ± 2.4 Maximum 17 Minimum 3.1 E/Ea 11.5 ± 4.1 Maximum 25.5 Minimum 3.1 GMI-TDI 0.58 ± 0.27 Maximum 1.19 Minimum 0.19 PASP, mmhg 41.9±14.9 Maximum 85 Minimum 14 NTproBNP, pg/ml 3055±4011 Maximum 25900 Minimum 20 NTproBNP > 900 pg/ml66(60) LV = left ventricle; E = maximal early diastolic transmitral velocity; Ea = maximal early mitral annular diastolic velocity ; GMI-TDI = global myocardial index obtained by Tissue Doppler Imaging; NTproBNP = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PASP = pulmonary artery systolic pressure; Sa = maximal systolic velocity of mitral annulus. 270 TMJ 2009, Vol. 59, No. 3-4

a b (r=0.56, p<0.001). (Fig. 3b) Significant correlations were also found between NTproBNP levels and Sa (r= -0.43, p<0.001), Ea (r= -0.24, p=0.01), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r=0.53, p<0.001), mitral E/A ratio (r=0.42, p=0.001), E wave (r= 0.33, p<0.001), mitral E deceleration time (r= -0.30, p=0.001) and LVEF (r= -0.26, p=0.006). (Fig. 3c) We couldn t demonstrate significant relationships between NTproBNP and left atrial diameter, left atrial surface, left atrial volume, indexed left atrial volume or end-diastolic LV volume. The area under ROC-curve (AUC) for prediction of NTproBNP levels >900pg/ml was greatest for GMI-TDI (AUC=0.90, p<0.001), followed by E/Ea ratio (AUC=0.76, p<0.001) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (AUC=0.75, p<0.001). A statistical comparison of the ROC curves demonstrates significant differences between GMI- TDI and E/Ea (p=0.001), and between TDI-GMI and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (p<0.001), respectively. (Fig. 4) The optimal GMI-TDI cut-off for prediction of NTproBNP levels > 900 pg/ml was 0.51 (sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 80%). In comparison, an optimal E/Ea cut-off value of 10.5 had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 73%, respectively a cut-off value of 38 mmhg for pulmonary artery systolic pressure had a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 70%. c Figure 3. Scatter plot of the relationship between global myocardial index determined by Tissue Doppler Imaging (GMI-TDI) (panel a), E/ Ea (panel b), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (panel c), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) in the 110 patients. E= maximal early diastolic transmitral velocity; Ea = maximal early mitral annular diastolic velocity; Sa= maximal systolic velocity of mitral annulus. Simple regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation between GMI- TDI and NTproBNP levels (r=0.73, p<0.001). (Fig. 3a) This was superior to the classical E/Ea correlation Figure 4. ROC curves for global myocardial index determined by Tissue Doppler Imaging (GMI-TDI), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and E/Ea in prediction of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) levels >900 pg/ml in the 110 patients. E = maximal early diastolic transmitral velocity; Ea = maximal early mitral annular diastolic velocity. The GMI-TDI showed a better correlation with NTproBNP in patients with normal LV ejection fraction (EF 50%) (34 patients, 31%, r=0.76, p<0.001) compared with those with depressed LVEF (76 patients, 69%, r=0.69, p<0.001). Ioanna Zacharopoulou et al 271

Figure 6. ROC curves for global myocardial index determined by Tissue Doppler Imaging (GMI-TDI), E/Ea, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) in prediction of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) levels >900 pg/ml in patients with E/Ea between 8 and 15. E = maximal early diastolic transmitral velocity; Ea = maximal early mitral annular diastolic velocity. DISCUSSION Figure 5. Scatter plot of the relationship between global myocardial index determined by Tissue Doppler Imaging (GMI-TDI) (first panel), Sa (second panel) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) in patients with E/Ea between 8 and 15. E = maximal early diastolic transmitral velocity; Ea = maximal early mitral annular diastolic velocity; Sa = maximal systolic velocity of mitral annulus. Mitral E/Ea between 8 and 15 Because intermediate E/Ea ratio (between 8 and 15) is an obscure zone for the estimation of LV filling pressure 2, this group was analyzed separately (60 patients, 54%). In these patients, NTproBNP was better correlated with GMI-TDI (r=0.61, p<0.001) than with Sa (r= -0.50, p<0.001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r=0.42, p=0.001) or E/Ea ratio (r=0.30, p=0.03). (Fig. 5) The areas under the ROC curves for prediction of NTproBNP levels >900 pg/ml were 0.84 for GMI-TDI (p=0.001), 0.74 for pulmonary artery systolic pressure (p=0.002), 0.70 for E/Ea ratio (p=0.008), and 0.67 for Sa (p=0.02). (Fig. 6) A statistical comparison of the ROC curves demonstrates significant differences between GMI-TDI and Sa (p=0.008), and between GMI-TDI and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (p=0.002), respectively. The optimal cut-off value for E/(Ea Sa) ratio was also 0.51 had a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 73 % for predicting NTproBNP levels >900pg/ml. In the present study we analyzed the correlation between different tissue Doppler parameters and NTproBNP plasma levels in consecutive patients with LV dysfunction, in sinus rhythm, referred for echocardiography. The GMI-TDI performed better than other standard echocardiographic and tissue Doppler parameters in predicting high NTproBNP plasma levels. Data on the association between conventional echocardiographic parameters and plasma levels of natriuretic peptides are contradictory. Previous studies have shown a correlation between natriuretic peptides and septal thickness, LV end-diastolic diameter, LVEF, left atrial diameter, and maximal tricuspid regurgitant flow velocity. 8,17,18 In these studies no correlation has been demonstrated between natriuretic peptides and other echocardiographic and Doppler parameters: E/A ratio, mitral E deceleration time, E wave or left atrial surface. 8,17 We report significant correlations but with a relatively low correlation coefficient between NTproBNP levels and E/A ratio, E velocity, LV ejection fraction and E deceleration time. We did not find significant relationships between NTproBNP and left atrial diameter, left atrial surface, left atrial volume, indexed left atrial volume or enddiastolic LV volume. The relationship between natriuretic peptides and TDI velocities (Ea, Sa, E/Ea) is controversial. 8-10 Mottram et al did not find a correlation between Ea and BNP levels in hypertensive patients. 9 However, these 272 TMJ 2009, Vol. 59, No. 3-4

authors reported a moderate relationship between late diastolic mitral annular velocity and BNP. In a study performed by Tretjak et al, Ea was the best predictor of the NTproBNP levels in patients with heart failure irrespective of rhythm or LV systolic function. 8 In that study Sa was notably correlated with NTproBNP. 8 These data are in agreement with our study, where Sa and Ea had a significant but low correlations with NTproBNP levels. This difference can probably be explained by differences in inclusion criteria: we studied consecutive patients with LV dysfunction, in sinus rhythm, while over 60% of heart failure patients in the study by Tretjak et al were in atrial fibrillation. Mottram et al restricted their analysis to hypertensive patients in sinus rhythm and normal LVEF. E/Ea ratio is actually used for estimating LV filling pressure. In our study, the E/Ea ratio showed a moderate correlation with NTproBNP levels. Ceyhan and Troughton observed also significant relationships between BNP levels and E/Ea ratio; results which disagree with another study reporting a weak correlation between E/Ea ratio and NTproBNP levels. 8,17,19 Myocardial performances index (GMI), defined as the sum of isovolumetric contraction and relaxation durations divided by ejection time and reflecting a combined LV systolic and diastolic function, was proposed by Tei. 20 This index has been demonstrated to be a powerful and independent prognostic indicator in patients with various cardiac disorders. 21-24 This index can also be obtained by TDI (GMI-TDI). 15 GMI obtained from tissue Doppler echocardiography has an inherent advantage of recording its systolic and diastolic components simultaneously on the same cardiac cycle. In a recent study, Su et al observed that GMI-TDI increased with worsening of LV diastolic function and can effectively identify the pseudonormal/restrictive mitral inflow pattern. 15 The present study demonstrates for the first time that GMI-TDI provides a close prediction of NTproBNP. In our series, the GMI-TDI appears to be more accurate than the classical E/Ea index for the estimation of NTproBNP levels in patients in sinus rhythm. The optimal cut-off value for prediction of NTproBNP levels >900 pg/ml was 0.51. In the present study, GMI-TDI correlated well with levels of NTproBNP regardless of LVEF. GMI-TDI index is a marker of LV diastolic and systolic function and reflects LV filling pressure. 15 Hence, GMI-TDI index can provide a simple and feasible method in assessing the global LV myocardial performance. Moreover, the advantage of this index is its components derived from the same cardiac cycle and beat-to-beat variations can be avoided. NTproBNP is also recognized as a reliable marker of both systolic and diastolic ventricular function. 4,25 Ommen et al and Dokainish et al suggested that E/Ea between 8 and 15 is unreliable for the prediction of LV filling pressure. 2,26 In our subgroup of patients with E/Ea between 8 and 15, GMI-TDI showed a better correlation with NTproBNP compared to the classic E/Ea and other studied echocardiographic parameters. As in the overall group, a cut-off of 0.51 for GMI-TDI had a good sensitivity and specificity for detecting NTproBNP>900 pg/ml in patients with E/Ea between 8 and 15. This cut-off can be used in clinical practice to predict high levels of plasma NTproBNP. The E/Ea ratio was superior to other echocardiographic parameters in predicting survival in patients with myocardial infarction. 27 The value of GMI-TDI as a predictor of survival is to be established by further studies in subsets of patients with normal and impaired LV function. Limitations The number of patients in this study was relatively small; however, we were able to reach several significant observations. A high proportion of patients referred for echocardiography in our laboratory have cardiac diseases. We deliberately did not use more sophisticated Doppler parameters, such as pulmonary venous curves or mitral inflow during a Valsalva maneuver, as these Doppler parameters are difficult to record and thus not suitable for simple screening. We have limited the tissue Doppler measurements at two sites (septal and lateral mitral annulus) and we did not examine anterior and posterior velocities that might have provided additional information. Patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter, inadequate echocardiographic image, congenital heart disease, paced rhythm, severe mitral valvular disease, mitral prosthesis, pericardial disease, acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery by-pass within 72 hours or renal failure were not included. Our results must be taken with caution in these subsets of patients. It is well recognized that the levels of NTproBNP are influenced by body mass index. In the Framingham Heart Study higher body mass index was associated with lower natriuretic peptide levels. 28 A substudy from PRIDE demonstrated a slight reduction in overall diagnostic accuracy with NTproBNP in obese patients. 29 In our study, the mean body mass index was comparable to the published values. Ioanna Zacharopoulou et al 273

CONCLUSIONS GMI-TDI strongly correlates with plasma NTproBNP levels, regardless of LV ejection fraction, and can be a simple and accurate echocardiographic index in patients with LV dysfunction, in sinus rhythm. Moreover it proves to be reliable particularly in patients with E/Ea between 8 and 15. The optimal E/(Ea Sa) cut-off of 0.51 has a good sensitivity and specificity and can be used in clinical practice for the noninvasive assessment of the LV function. REFERENCES 1. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA et al. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(6):1527-33. 2. Ommen S, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Dopplercatheterization study. Circulation 2000;102(15):1788-94. 3. Wang J, Khoury DS, Thohan V et al. Global Diastolic Strain Rate for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Relaxation and Filling Pressures. Circulation 2007;115(11):1376-83. 4. Felker GM, Petersen JW, Mark DB. Natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis and management of heart failure. CMAJ 2006;175(6):611-7. 5. Barclay JL, Kruszewski K, Croal BL, Cuthbertson BH, Oh JK, Hillis GS. Relation of left atrial volume to B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(1):98-101. 6. de Lemos JA, McGuire DK, Drazner MH. B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2003;362(9380):316-22. 7. Januzzi J, Camargo C, Anwaruddin S et al. The N-terminal Pro-BNP Investigation of Dyspneea in the Emergency Departament (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol 2005;95(8):948-54. 8. Tretjak M, Verovnik F, Benko D, Kozel M. Tissue Doppler velocities of mitral annulus and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7(4):520-4. 9. Mottram PM, Leano R, Marwick TH. Usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide in hypertensive patients with exertional dyspnea and normal left ventricular ejection fraction and correlation with new echocardiographic indexes of systolic and diastolic function. Am J Cardiol 2003;92(12):1434-8. 10. Arques S, Roux E, Luccioni R. Current clinical applications of spectral tissue Doppler echocardiography (E/E ratio) as a noninvasive surrogate for left ventricular diastolic pressures in the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2007;5:16. 11. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(2):107-33. 12. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiography 2006;7(2):79-108. 13. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M et al. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15(2):167-84. 14. Oki T, Tabata T, Yamada HL et al. Clinical application of pulsed Doppler tissue imaging for assessing abnormal left ventricular relaxation. Am J Cardiol 1997;(7)79:921-8. 15. Su HM, Lin TH, Voon WC, et al. Differentiation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, identification of pseudonormal/restrictive mitral inflow pattern and determination of left ventricular filling pressure by Tei index obtained from tissue Doppler echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2006;23(4):287-94. 16. Barnes SC, Collinson PO, Galasko G et al. Evaluation of N-terminal pro-b type natriuretic peptide analysis on the Elecsys 1010 and 2010 analysers. Ann Clin Biochem 2004;41(6):459-63 17. Ceyhan C, Unal S, Yenisey EC et al. The role of N terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: correlation with echocardiographic indexes in hypertensive patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24(3):253-9. 18. Elnoamany MF, Abdelhameed AK. Mitral annular motion as a surrogate for left ventricular function: Correlation with brain natriuretic peptide levels. Eur J Echocardiography 2006;7:187-198 19. Troughton RW, Prior DL, Pereira JJ et al. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels in systolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(3):416-22 20. Tei C, Nishimura RA, Seward JB, et al: Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index: Correlation with simultaneous measurements of cardiac catheterization measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997;10:169-78. 21. Dujardin KS, Tei C, Yeo TC, et al: Prognostic value of a Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic performance in idiopathic-dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:1071-6. 22. Poulsen SH, Jensen SE, Tei C, et al: Value of the Doppler index of myocardial performance in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:723-30. 23. Ascione L, Michele MD, Accadia M, et al: Myocardial global performance index as a predictor of in-hospital cardiac events in patients with first myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 6:1019-23. 24. Arnlov J, Ingelsson E, Riserus U, et al: Myocardial performance index, a Doppler-derived index of global left ventricular function, predicts congestive heart failure in elderly men. Eur Heart J 2004;25:222-5. 25. Burke M, Cotts W. Interpretation of B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiac disease and other comorbid conditions. Heart Fail Rev 2007;12(1):23-36. 26. Dokainish H, Zoghbi WA, Lakkis NM et al. Optimal noninvasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparison of tissue Doppler echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with pulmonary artery catheters.circulation 2004;109(20):2432-9. 27. Hillis GS, Moller JE, Pellikka PA et al. Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(3):360-7. 28. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D et al. Impact of obesity on plasma natriuretic peptide levels. Circulation 2004;109(5):594-600. 29. Krauser D, Lloyd-Jones D, Chae C et al. Effect of body mass index on natriuretic peptide levels in patients with acute congestive heart failure: a probnp Investigation of Dyspneea in the Emergency Departament (PRIDE) substudy. Am Heart J 2005;149(4):744-750. 274 TMJ 2009, Vol. 59, No. 3-4