Gli endpoint micro-vascolari nei trial di outcome cardiovascolare

Similar documents
Diabete: terapia nei pazienti a rischio cardiovascolare

La lezione dei trials di safety cardiovascolare. Edoardo Mannucci

Terapia con agonisti GLP1 e outcome cardiovascolare. Edoardo Mannucci

Quando l insulina basale non basta più: differenti e nuove strategie terapeutiche

PROTEZIONE DAL DANNO RENALE NEL DIABETE TIPO 2: RUOLO DEI NUOVI FARMACI. Massimo Boemi UOC Malattie Metaboliche e Diabetologia IRCCS INRCA Ancona

Update on Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcome Trials

Du gusts is megl che one. Edoardo Mannucci

Update on Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Diabetes Jay S. Skyler, MD, MACP

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Tom Blevins MD Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology Austin, Texas

CANVAS Program Independent commentary

Microvascular Complications in Diabetes:

Can We Reduce Heart Failure by Treating Diabetes? CVOT Data on SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1Receptor Agonists

Preventing Serious Health Consequences of Type 2 Diabetes

ADVANCE post trial ObservatioNal Study

LATE BREAKING STUDIES IN DM AND CAD. Will this change the guidelines?

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Il razionale delle associazioni terapeutiche sulla protezione cardiovascolare

Medical therapy advances London/Manchester RCP February/June 2016

T2 Diabetes in Sep-16. Stephen Leow Disclosures. Why do we treat diabetes? Agenda. Targets

Kidney and heart: dangerous liaisons. Luis M. RUILOPE (Madrid, Spain)

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Update sul danno macrovascolare: fisiopatologia e indicazioni per la prevenzione

No Increased Cardiovascular Risk for Lixisenatide in ELIXA

Updates in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Management: Are You Making the Link?

Nuove opportunità terapeutiche nel Diabete Mellito

Why is Earlier and More Aggressive Treatment of T2 Diabetes Better?

Cardiologists and HbA1c: Novel Diabetes Drugs and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes

Diabetes and Heart Failure: The Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management Denise M. Kolanczyk, PharmD, BCPS-AQ Cardiology

Glucose and CV disease

Sulfoniluree e glinidi: pro e contro

Current Updates & Challenges In Managing Diabetes in CVD

Terapia nel paziente diabetico anziano: cosa dicono le linee guida nazionali e internazionali

Diabetic Nephropathy. Objectives:

Current principles of diabetes management

CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTOR CONTROL IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS AND NEW TRIAL EVIDENCE

Endocrinologist Sweetgrass Endocrinology

Oral Hypoglycemics and Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events: A Summary of the Controversy

CV outcomes Studies and Implications for diabetes management. Seraj Abualnaja, MD, FRCPC Consultant Interventional cardiologist DSFH

Diabetes new challenges, new agents, new order

Update on CVD and Microvascular Complications in T2D

1. Albuminuria an early sign of glomerular damage and renal disease. albuminuria

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Microvascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes

Cardiovascular Benefits of Two Classes of Antihyperglycemic Medications

Cardiovascular Impact of Medications for Treating Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes affects an estimated 25.8 million

Can Treating Diabetes with SGLT2 inhibitors Prevent Heart Failure?

Glucose Control and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Long-Term Care Updates

Cardiovascular Consequences of Diabetes Mellitus

SGLT2 inhibition in diabetes: extending from glycaemic control to renal and cardiovascular protection

When Statins Aren t Enough: Appropriate Therapies for High-Risk Patients with Diabetes

Case Studies in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Focus on Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials

Diabetes Drugs and Cardiac Disease. Disclosures

Diabetes Management in CAD Patients. Stuart R. Chipkin, MD Research Professor School of Public Health and Health Sciences University of Massachusetts

razionale della combinazione insulina/glp-1 RAs

Complications of Diabetes: Screening and Prevention

LEADER Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

Shifting Paradigms in the Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Reflections on Recent Cardiovascular Outcome Trials

DPP-4 inhibitor use and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a new safety issue of a safe drug Nam Hoon Kim

A Fork in the Road: Navigating Through New Terrain

Overview T2DM medications. Winnie Ho

New Strategies for Cardiovascular Risk reduction in Diabetes

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

LEADER and EMPA-REG. John Buse, MD, PhD. University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Duality of Interest Declaration

Farmaci innovativi e terapie di associazione: quali opportunità? Giuseppe Penno Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale

Vascular complications

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Newer Diabetes Drugs: Results From The EMPA-REG and LEADER Trials

Multi-factor approach to reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetes

American Academy of Insurance Medicine

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Newer Diabetes Treatments Drug Class Update with New Drug Evaluation: Semaglutide and Ertugliflozin

CARDIO-RENAL SYNDROME

In compliance with the accrediting board policies, the American Diabetes Association requires the following disclosure to the participants:

Sommer Memorial Advancements in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Lectures. Jessica Castle, MD Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center

Initiating Insulin in Primary Care for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Dr Manish Khanolkar, Diabetologist, Auckland Diabetes Centre

Diabetes and kidney disease.

What s the Goal? Individualizing Glycemic Targets. Matthew Freeby M.D. December 3 rd, 2016

Supplementary Appendix

Glucose Lowering Medications and CV Risk Reduction: A New Era Jane EB Reusch MD ADA President for Medicine and Science

La protezione cardiovascolare degli inibitori di SGLT2: trial e studi osservazionali

Content Development Committee

Diabetes Update What s the fuss about CV Death?

MSD NOVO NOVARTIS LILLY

Navigating the New Options for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes

What s New in Type 2 Diabetes? 2018 Diabetes Updates

Impatto dei farmaci antidiabetici sullo scompenso cardiaco

Glucose Control: Does it lower CV risk?

Drug Class Update with New Drug Evaluation: Non-insulin Diabetes Treatments (SGLT-2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists)

Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Diabetes Medications: Translating Results into Practice

Diabetes at the limits

DISCLOSURES. Learning objectives NAVIGATING THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES: WHAT S NEW? Investigator Initiated Trial Support:

NEW DIABETES CARE MEDICATIONS

Diabetic Management of the Cardiac Patient

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Heather Corn, MD, MS Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism

MANAGING DIABETES IN 2016 WHAT TO ADD, WHEN AND WHY?

Update on Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Diabetes. Rury R. Holman, FMedSci NIHR Senior Investigator 11 th February 2013

Hot Topics in Diabetic Kidney Disease a primary care perspective

Transcription:

Gli endpoint micro-vascolari nei trial di outcome cardiovascolare Giorgio Sesti University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro ITALY

Potenziali conflitti di interesse Il Prof Giorgio Sesti dichiara di aver ricevuto negli ultimi due anni compensi o finanziamenti dalle seguenti Aziende Farmaceutiche e/o Diagnostiche: Novo Nordisk, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis e Takeda per attività di Relatore ad eventi. Novo Nordisk, Intarcia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Servier, AstraZeneca e Janssen per attività di Consulenza.

Ringrazio caldamente la SID per lo straordinario contributo alla mia formazione culturale, scientifica e clinica. Senza il fondamentale sostegno della SID non sarei oggi qui a presentare questa mia relazione.

Adjusted ESRD incident rates, by primary diagnosis, & diabetes in the general population Incident ESRD patients; rates adjusted for age, gender, & race. Data on the prevalence of diabetes in the general population obtained from the CDC s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, at www.cdc.gov/brfss.

Prevalence of albuminuria and egfr categoried and CKD stages (with stratification of subjects with Stages 3-5 CKD by albuminuria) in the RIACE cohort Pugliese G et at. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 24: 815-822, 2014

Prevalence of major acute CVD events by CKD phenotype in the RIACE cohort Publiese G et at. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 24: 815-822, 2014

Landmark CV outcomes studies in type 2 diabetes 1. Intensive glucose control vs. standard-therapy on CV outcome: UKPDS ACCORD ADVANCE VADT 2. Glucose-lowering drugs vs. placebo on CV outcome: HOME (metformin add on to insulin) Origin (insulin glargine) 3. New glucose-lowering drugs vs. placebo on CV outcome after 2008 FDA guidance: SAVOR-TIMI 53 (saxagliptin) EXAMINE (alogliptin) TECOS (sitagliptin) ELIXA (lixisenatide) EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin) LEADER (liraglutide) SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide)

Hazard ratio Microvascular Endpoints 1 5 37% decrease per 1% decrement in HbA1c 1 0 P<0.0001 1 0. 5 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Updated mean HbA 1c UKPDS 35. BMJ 2000; 321: 405-12

UKPDS, ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT Study Characteristics UKPDS 33 UKPDS 34 ACCORD ADVANCE VADT Protocol Characteristics A1C goals, % (I vs S) a FPG <108 mg/dl vs. best achievable FPG with diet alone FPG <108 mg/dl vs. best achievable FPG with diet alone <6.0 vs 7.0-7.9 6.5 vs based on local guidelines <6.0 (action if >6.5) vs planned separation of 1.5 Protocol for glycemic control (I vs. S) a Sulfonylurea or insulin vs. diet alone Metformin, vs. diet alone Multiple drugs in both arms Multiple drugs added to gliclazide vs multiple drugs with no gliclazide Multiple drugs in both arms Management of other risk factors Embedded blood pressure trial Embedded blood pressure trial Embedded blood pressure and lipid trials Embedded blood pressure trial Protocol for intensive treatment in both arms a Medication rates for ACCORD are for any use during the study. I = intensive glycemic control; S = standard glycemic control. Turnbull FR, et al. Diabetologia 52:2288 2298, 2009

UKPDS, ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT Results Outcomes HbA1c (Intensive vs. Standard) Definition of outcome RR for microalbuminuria UKPDS 33 UKPDS 34 ACCORD ADVANCE VADT 7.0 vs. 7.9% 7.4 vs. 8.0 6.5 vs. 7.3% 6.4 vs. 7.5% 6.9 vs. 8.4% 21 clinical endpoints 0.88 (0.75-1.04) 21 clinical endpoints 1.00 (0.77-1.30) Nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, CVD death 0.88 (0.80-0.96) Microvascular plus macrovascular (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, CVD death) outcomes 0.92 (0.86-0.98) Nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, CVD death, hospitalizatio n for heart failure, revascularizati on 0.74 (0.51-1.07) RR for End Stage Renal Disease 0.74 (0.33-1.67) 1.20 (0.17-8.49) 0.91 (0.73-1.15) 0.35 (0.18-0.70) 0.64 (0.25-1.64) Coca SG et al. Arch Intern Med 172(10):761-769, 2012

% of patients with an event UKPDS - Microvascular Endpoints (cumulative) renal failure or death, vitreous haemorrhage or photocoagulation 346 of 3867 patients (9%) 30% 20% Conventional Intensive P=0.0099 Risk reduction 25% (95% CI: 7 % to 40%) 10% 0% 0 3 6 9 12 15 Years from randomisation Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

UKPDS 33: Microvascular events (Retinopathy and nephropathy) favours intensive favours conventional RR 0.1 1 10 Chlorpropamide (n=619) Glibenclamide (n=615) Insulin (n= 911) 0.86 (0.63-1.17) 0.66 (0.47-0.93) 0.70 (0.52-0.93) P = 0.33 P = 0.017 P = 0.015 UKPDS 33 Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

UKPDS 80: Extended effects of improved glycemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes- Microvascular disease Hazard Ratio (photocoagulation, vitreous haemorrhage, renal failure) Intensive (SU/Ins) vs. Conventional glucose control HR (95%CI) Holman R.R. et al. N Engl J Med 359:1577-1589, 2008

Proportion of patients with events UKPDS 34 Metformin substudy: Microvascular endpoints Overweight patients 0.3 Conventional (411) Intensive (951) Metformin (342) 0.2 M v C P=0.19 0.1 0.0 M v I P=0.39 0 3 6 9 12 15 Years from randomisation UKPDS 34. Lancet 352:854-865, 1998

UKPDS 80: Extended effects of improved glycemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes- Microvascular disease Hazard Ratio (Photocoagulation, vitreous haemorrhage, renal failure) Intensive (metformin) vs. Conventional glucose control HR (95%CI) Holman R.R. et al. N Engl J Med 359:1577-1589, 2008

Ismail-Beigi F et al. Lancet 76:419-430, 2010

Composite Microvascular Outcomes 1 st Composite Outcome: Development of renal failure or diabetic eye complications Renal failure: initiation of dialysis or ESRD, renal transplantation, or irreversible rise of serum creatinine above 3.3 mg/dl Eye complications: retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy to treat diabetic retinopathy Essentially replicates UKPDS composite micro-vascular outcome Ismail-Beigi F et al. Lancet 76:419-430, 2010

Kaplan-Meier plots of the micro-vascular primary composite outcome Data until transition of intensive glycemia group to standard therapy HR : 1.00 (95% CI 0.88, 1.14) P = 0.99 Ismail-Beigi F et al. Lancet 76:419-430, 2010

Nephropathy Outcomes 1. Development of microalbuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio 30 and <300 mg/g) 2. Development of macroalbuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio 300 mg/g) 3. Development of renal failure (initiation of dialysis or ESRD, or renal transplantation, or irreversible rise of serum creatinine above 3.3 mg/dl) 4. Development of any of outcomes 1 to 3, above 5. Doubling of baseline serum creatinine or more than 20 ml/min/1.73 m 2 decrease in estimated GFR Ismail-Beigi F et al. Lancet 76:419-430, 2010

Comparison of intensive and standard glycaemic therapy for development of microalbuminuria, until transition 0.6 Glycemia Arm STD INT Proportion With Event 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 HR (95% CI): 0.79 (0.69, 0.90) P= 0.0005 0.1 0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 Months Post-randomization Ismail-Beigi F et al. Lancet 76:419-430, 2010

Comparison of intensive and standard glycemic therapy for development of macroalbuminuria, until transition Proportion With Event 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Glycemia Arm STD INT HR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.54, 0.86) P = 0.0013 0.1 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Months Post-randomization Ismail-Beigi F et al. Lancet 76:419-430, 2010

N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

Major microvascular events 25 20 Standard Intensive Relative risk reduction 14%: 95% CI: 3 to 23% P=0.015 15 10 5 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 Follow-up (months) N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

ADANCE: Major microvascular events Number of patients with event Intensive Standard (n=5,571) (n=5,569) Favors Intensive Favors Standard Relative risk reduction (95% CI) Microvascular 526 605 14% (3 to 23) New or worsening retinopathy 332 349 5% (-10 to 18) New or worsening nephropathy 230 292 21% (7 to 34) 0.5 1.0 2.0 Hazard ratio P=0.01 P=0.006 N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

VADT = Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial Duckworth, W et al. N Engl J Med 360:129-139, 2009

VADT: Microvascular Outcomes Outcome, n/n (%) Standard (n=899) Intensive (n=892) P Retinopathy Progression to proliferative disease 16/399 (4.0%) 23/406 (5.7%) 0.27 Progression to macular edema 17/361 (4.7) 12/371 (3.2) 0.31 Increase of 2 steps in disease severity 88/399 (22.1) 69/406 (17.0) 0.07 New onset 66/135 (48.9) 54/128 (42.2) 0.27 Nephropathy Serum creatinine >3 mg/dl 16/884 (1.8) 18/882 (2.0) 0.72 Glomerular filtration rate <15 ml/min 11/884 (1.2) 7/882 (0.8) 0.35 Any increase in albuminuria 48/731 (6.6) 30/728 (4.1) 0.05 New Neuropathy Any 218/498 (43.8) 202/464 (43.5) 0.94 Mononeuropathy 20/498 (4.0) 22/464 (4.7) 0.58 Peripheral 199/498 (40.0) 178/464 (38.4) 0.61 Autonomic 26/498 (5.2) 38/464 (8.2) 0.07 Duckworth W et al; the VADT Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 360(2):129-139, 2009

Role of intensive glucose control in development of renal endpoints in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Microalbuminuria Coca SG et al. Arch Intern Med 172(10):761-769, 2012

Role of intensive glucose control in development of renal endpoints in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Macroalbuminuria Coca SG et al. Arch Intern Med 172(10):761-769, 2012

Role of intensive glucose control in development of renal endpoints in type 2 diabetes mellitus: end-stage renal disease Coca SG et al. Arch Intern Med 172(10):761-769, 2012

Landmark CV outcomes studies in type 2 diabetes 1. Intensive glucose control vs. standard-therapy on CV outcome: UKPDS ACCORD ADVANCE VADT 2. Glucose-lowering drugs vs. placebo on CV outcome: HOME (metformin add on to insulin) Origin (insulin glargine) 3. New glucose-lowering drugs vs. placebo on CV outcome after 2008 FDA guidance: SAVOR-TIMI 53 (saxagliptin) EXAMINE (alogliptin) TECOS (sitagliptin) ELIXA (lixisenatide) EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin) LEADER (liraglutide) SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide)

Hyperinsulinemia: the Outcome of its Metabolic Effects (HOME) The HR for the primary end point, an aggregate of microvascular and macrovascular morbidity and mortality, was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.72-1.18; P=0.33). The HR for the secondary, microvascular endpoint was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.75-1.44; P=0.43). Kooy A et al. Arch Intern Med 169:616-625, 2009

The ORIGIN trial investigators. Diabetologia 57:1325 1331, 2014

Incidence of the primary micro-vascular composite outcome in participants to ORIGIN trial Time-to-event curves for the composite microvascular outcome* HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.90-1.05]; P=0.43 Median follow-up of 6.2 years. *Doubling of serum creatinine, worsening of albuminuria, renal replacement therapy or death due to renal failure, or diabetic retinopathy requiring retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy. The ORIGIN trial investigators. Diabetologia 57:1325 1331, 2014

Insulin glargine reduced the incidence of the primary micro-vascular composite outcome in participants whose baseline HbA1c was 6.4%: ORIGIN Time-to-event curves for the composite micro-vascular outcome* Patients with baseline HbA1c 6.4% Patients with baseline HbA1c<6.4% HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.81-0.99] HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.95-1.20] Median follow-up of 6.2 years. *Doubling of serum creatinine, worsening of albuminuria, renal replacement therapy or death due to renal failure, or diabetic retinopathy requiring retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy. The ORIGIN trial investigators. Diabetologia 57:1325 1331, 2014

Landmark CV outcomes studies in type 2 diabetes 1. Intensive glucose control vs. standard-therapy on CV outcome: UKPDS ACCORD ADVANCE VADT 2. Glucose-lowering drugs vs. placebo on CV outcome: HOME (metformin add on to insulin) Origin (insulin glargine) 3. New glucose-lowering drugs vs. placebo on CV outcome after 2008 FDA guidance: SAVOR-TIMI 53 (saxagliptin) EXAMINE (alogliptin) TECOS (sitagliptin) ELIXA (lixisenatide) EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin) LEADER (liraglutide) SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide)

Scirica BM et al. N Engl J Med 2013

Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with DM - TIMI 53- Changes in Microalbuminuria 20 Shift from baseline category (<3.4, 3.4-33.9, or >33.9 mg/mmol) Saxagliptin Placebo global P<0.001 (%) 15 10 13% 16% 11% 9% 5 0 Worsened End of Treatment Improved Scirica BM et al. N Engl J Med 2013

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (egfr) Estimated overall mean difference*: -1.34 ml/min/1.73m 2 (95%CI -1.76, -0.91), P<0.0001 *Mixed model with random intercept & slope, adjusted for baseline value and region Gren JB et al. N Engl J Med 373:232-42, 2015

N Engl J Med 373:2117-2128, 2015

Kaplan Meier analysis of incident or worsening nephropathy, defined as progression to macroalbuminuria (urinary albumin to-creatinine ratio, >300 mg/g); a doubling of the serum creatinine level, accompanied by an egfr of 45 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2, the initiation of renal-replacement therapy; or death from renal disease Wanner C et al. N Engl J Med 375(4):323-34, 2016

Risk Comparison for Renal Outcomes in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial Renal Outcome Measure Incident or worsening nephropathy or CV death Incident or worsening nephropathy Progression to macroalbuminuria Doubling of serum creatinine level accompanied by egfr of 45 ml/min/1.73 m 2 Initiation of renal replacement therapy Incident albuminuria in patients with a normal albumin level at baseline Patients (%) HR (95% CI) Empagliflozin Placebo 16.2 23.6 0.61 (0.55 to 0.69) 12.7 18.8 0.61 (0.53 to 0.70) 11.2 16.2 0.62 (0.54 to 0.72) 1.5 2.6 0.56 (0.39 to 0.79) 0.3 0.6 0.45 (0.21 to 0.97) 51.5 51.2 0.95 (0.87 to 1.04) Wanner C et al. N Engl J Med 375(4):323-34, 2016

Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016

LEADER - Time to first renal event Macroalbuminuria, doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, renal death The cumulative incidences were estimated with the use of the Kaplan Meier method, and the hazard ratios with the use of the Cox proportional-hazard regression model. The data analyses are truncated at 54 months, because less than 10% of the patients had an observation time beyond 54 months. CI: confidence interval; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; HR: hazard ratio. Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016

Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016

SUSTAIN-6 Study: Time to first renal event Macroalbuminuria, doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, renal death Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016