INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS Russell J. Ottens, John R. Ruberson, Robert E. Harbin, and Phillip M. Roberts Dept. of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA Introduction Insecticides remain the method of choice for control of lepidopteran pests in Georgia cotton, though great strides have been made during the past two decades in reducing chemical use. The successful eradication of the boll weevil combined with the planting of transgenic cotton, effective scouting, and careful crop management have served to significantly lessen reliance on insecticides. Though Georgia has not experienced any widespread resistance problems during this time, other states have and the potential exists. Since 1979, we have performed bioassays on major lepidopteran cotton pests to monitor development of insecticide resistance. In 2003, larvae and adults of the bollworm, Helicoverpa zea, and adults of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens, were bioassayed for resistance to certain carbamate, organophosphate, and pyrethroid insecticides. Materials and Methods Larval Bioassays. Bollworm cultures were established from adults collected from sugar lines in cotton in June and July 2003 in Burke, Montgomery, and Tift Counties. Sugar lines consist of field-edge rows of cotton that have been sprayed with a 5% sugar solution shortly before sunset. Moths coming to the sprayed plants to feed on the sugar-water are then captured as they arrive. Larvae were collected during the same time period of the summer in Berrien, Colquitt, Irwin, and Sumter Counties. Eggs were collected from moths confined in 1 gal plastic containers with cheesecloth lids serving as oviposition sites. Upon hatching, neonate larvae were placed on pinto bean meal synthetic diet in 30 ml plastic cups. Field-collected larvae were reared to adulthood and F1 larvae were used exclusively for all bioassays. Larval tobacco budworms were not tested in 2003 due to extremely low moth trap catches. All life stages of the insects were held in an incubator at 30 + 2 o C, ca 60% RH and a 14:10 hr light: dark cycle. Evaluation of larval susceptibility of H. zea basically followed protocol outlined in the ESA Standard Test Method for detection of resistance in Heliothis spp. (Anon. 1970). Larvae were treated with 99.2% technical grade acephate, 92.4% technical grade cypermethrin, 98% technical grade methomyl, or 95% technical grade permethrin. Stock solutions in acetone were prepared and serially diluted to obtain the desired concentrations. Microgram equivalents were calculated, adjusting for the percent active ingredient in the technical materials. One microliter of solution was applied to the dorsal 178
thoracic region of each larva using a Microliter no. 705 (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV) hand-held applicator. Four to five replications were used in each bioassay with ten third instar, 30-40 mg larvae per dosage and an acetone check. Observations were made 72 hr post-treatment and a larva was considered dead if it made no movement when prodded with a pencil point. Larvae were considered moribund if they moved when prodded, yet appeared black and as small or smaller than their size at treatment. These were considered alive when determining LD (lethal dosage) values, but considered dead when calculating ED (effective dosage) values. In many instances, larvae treated with pyrethroids linger on several days beyond observation time as moribund larvae that eventually die. For this reason we present ED values as well as LD values to present a more complete picture of dosage-response. Data were analyzed using Daum's (1970) probit analysis computer program. Adult Bioassays. For adult tobacco budworm and bollworm bioassays, moths were collected from pheromone traps placed near cotton fields at two locations in Tift Co. in the summer of 2003. Pheromone lures attached to each trap were replaced every two weeks. The morning of each test, the trap tops containing the moths were brought to the laboratory where they were removed for the bioassays. The empty trap tops were then returned to the field. In all instances, bioassayed moths were trapped the previous night and never confined during the heat of the day. Tests were performed using 20 ml scintillation vials coated with an acetone solution of 92.4% technical grade cypermethrin with dosages ranging from 1.25 to 10 :g/vial and an acetone check. A total volume of 0.5 ml of acetone/insecticide mixture was placed in each vial and rolled horizontally on a modified hot dog roller until the acetone had evaporated. The vials were then stored in a freezer until used. As in the larval bioassays, the amount of technical compound weighed out for the stock solution was corrected for purity. One moth was placed in each vial with the cap screwed on loosely. Percent survival was checked after 24 hours. Counts were taken for live, knockeddown (moribund), and dead moths. Only moths able to fly in a normal manner were counted as alive. Numbers assayed varied with the number of moths available and the percentage data were transformed (arcsin(t%)) prior to analysis with the General Linear Models procedure of SAS (SAS Institute 1988). Results and Discussion Larval Bioassays. The ED 50, ED 90, LD 50, and LD 90 values for the 2003 bollworm larval bioassays are presented in tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Values for acephate in larvae from all counties were lower than the Tift Co. value for 2001, and in most instances, lower than the average of bioassays performed on Tift Co. larvae since 1983. For cypermethrin, ED and LD values generally showed increased tolerance by larvae of all counties over the Tift Co. average since 1983. The 2001 Tift Co. value was abnormally low at 0.0007 :g/g larval wt., bringing the average down much more than would have occurred had the value been closer to those of previous years. The 179
apparent increased tolerance to cypermethrin should not be classified as resistance, especially since Tift Co. ED 50 values of 0.37, 0.36, and 0.56 :g/g larval wt. were recorded in 1984, 1985, and 1988, respectively. This year s range of cypermethrin ED 50 's went from a low of 0.26 :g/g larval wt. for H. zea in Irwin Co. to a high of 0.90 :g/g larval wt. for the same species in Berrien Co. ED values for permethrin in Tift Co. larvae were lower than the average since 1979. Increased tolerance to methomyl seemed apparent in Tift Co. larvae this year, though the ED 50 value of 20.75 :g/g larval wt. is very similar to a previous peak of 19.66 :g/g larval wt. in 1988. Adult Bioassays. Table 5 presents the results of our adult tobacco budworm and bollworm glass vial bioassays. A diagnostic dose of cypermethrin is considered to be 10 :g/vial for H. virescens and 5 :g/vial for H. zea. At 10 :g/vial, there was 3.2% survival for H. virescens, lower than the 2002 value of 12%. At 5 :g/vial, there was 30.0% survival for Helicoverpa zea from Tift County compared to 22.5% from the same location last year. Though this appears to be a substantial increase in tolerance, H. zea at the10 :g level had 0% survival this year compared to 15% last year. Increased levels of pyrethroid tolerance in larval and adult bioassays should be viewed with some concern, though our data indicate no obvious resistance problems at present in the populations tested. Future monitoring of both species, and from more populations, is essential. References Cited Anonymous. 1970. Second conference on test methods for resistance in insects of agricultural importance. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 16:147-153. Daum, R. J. 1970. A revision of two computer programs for probit analysis. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 16:10-15. SAS Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT User s Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Acknowledgments We greatly appreciate the long-term support for this work by the Georgia Cotton Commission and Cotton Incorporated. 180
Table 1. ED 50 's for various insecticides against larval Helicoverpa zea (CEW) at 72 hr post-treatment. 2003. Chemical Gen. No. Reps. ED 50 (:g/g larval wt.) 95% C.I. 2001 avg Slope + SE Acephate Berrien Co. F 1 5 12.70 10.26-15.56-6.70-3.51 1.78 + 0.15 Burke Co. F 1 5 7.62 6.51-8.88-11.78-9.49 3.03 + 0.30 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 11.96 6.70-20.26-7.44-4.25 2.21 + 0.42 Irwin Co. F 1 3 4.52 3.88-5.26-14.88-11.69 5.49 + 0.89 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 6.00 4.89-7.21-13.40-10.21 2.27 + 0.23 Sumter Co. F 1 5 8.74 7.60-10.05-10.66-7.47 3.62 + 0.37 Tift Co. F 1 5 18.60 15.42-22.37-0.80 +2.39 2.07 + 0.17 Cypermethrin * Berrien Co. F 1 5 0.90 0.74-1.09 +0.90 +0.63 1.87 + 0.15 Burke Co. F 1 5 0.36 0.30-0.43 +0.36 +0.09 2.26 + 0.22 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 0.63 0.53-0.74 +0.63 +0.36 2.63 + 0.23 Irwin Co. F 1 3 0.26 0.22-0.30 +0.26 +0.01 4.15 + 0.61 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 0.37 0.30-0.45 +0.37 +0.10 1.99 + 0.19 Sumter Co. F 1 5 0.42 0.36-0.50 +0.42 +0.15 2.59 + 0.24 Tift Co. F 1 5 0.54 0.46-0.63 +0.54 +0.27 2.97 + 0.28 Methomyl Tift Co. F 1 5 20.75 17.58-24.47 +20.20 +14.88 2.56 + 0.22 Permethrin Tift Co. F 1 5 0.50 0.42-0.61 - -0.01 1.96 + 0.16 *See text concerning an abnormally low value for cypermethrin in 2001 181
Table 2. ED 90 's for various insecticides against larval Helicoverpa zea (CEW) at 72 hr post-treatment. 2003. Chemical Acephate Gen. No. Reps. ED 90 (:g/g larval wt.) 95% C.I. 2001 avg Slope + SE Berrien Co. F 1 5 66.35 49.96-95.90-28.14 +6.76 1.78 + 0.15 Burke Co. F 1 5 20.20 16.45-26.64-74.29-39.39 3.03 + 0.30 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 45.56 25.58-159.41-48.93-14.03 2.21 + 0.42 Irwin Co. F 1 3 7.74 6.45-10.44-86.75-51.85 5.49 + 0.89 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 22.00 17.24-30.59-72.49-37.59 2.27 + 0.23 Sumter Co. F 1 5 19.75 16.42-25.39-74.74-39.84 3.62 + 0.37 Cypermethrin Tift Co. F 1 5 0 77.45 59.88-107.78-17.04 +17.86 2.07 + 0.17 Berrien Co. F 1 5 4.36 3.30-6.23 +4.31 +3.39 1.87 + 0.15 Burke Co. F 1 5 1.34 1.05-1.86 +1.29 +0.37 2.26 + 0.22 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 1.93 1.55-2.58 +1.88 +0.96 2.63 + 0.23 Irwin Co. F 1 3 0.52 0.42-0.73 +0.47-0.45 4.15 + 0.61 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 1.63 1.26-2.32 +1.58 +0.66 1.99 + 0.19 Sumter Co. F 1 5 1.32 1.06-1.78 +1.27 +0.35 2.59 + 0.24 Methomyl Permethrin Tift Co. F 1 5 1.47 1.19-1.93 +1.42 +0.50 2.97 + 0.28 Tift Co. F 1 5 65.69 52.49-87.79 +48.13 +23.88 2.56 + 0.22 Tift Co. F 1 5 2.27 1.74-3.21 - -0.43 1.96 + 0.16 *See text concerning an abnormally low value for cypermethrin in 2001 182
Table 3. LD 50 's for various insecticides against larval Helicoverpa zea (CEW) at 72 hr post-treatment. 2003. Chemical Gen. No. Reps. LD 50 (:g/g larval wt.) 95% C.I. 2001 avg Slope + SE Acephate Berrien Co. F 1 5 35.94 27.04-48.63-173.41-12.76 1.10 + 0.11 Burke Co. F 1 5 21.34 16.84-26.93-188.01-27.36 1.44 + 0.12 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 31.10 24.38-39.92-178.25-17.60 1.35 + 0.12 Irwin Co. F 1 3 13.95 9.96-18.97-195.40-27.34 1.40 + 0.16 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 12.17 9.60-15.18-197.18-36.53 1.58 + 0.14 Sumter Co. F 1 5 20.50 12.72-32.46-188.85-28.20 1.62 + 0.22 Tift Co. F 1 5 41.29 33.05-52.15-168.06-7.41 1.54 + 0.13 Cypermethrin * Berrien Co. F 1 5 1.81 1.44-2.30 +1.76 +0.87 1.48 + 0.13 Burke Co. F 1 5 0.79 0.63-0.99 +0.74-0.15 1.52 + 0.13 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 1.84 1.45-2.35 +1.79 +0.90 1.42 + 0.12 Irwin Co. F 1 3 0.50 0.38-0.65 +0.45-0.44 1.92 + 0.22 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 1.10 0.84-1.43 +1.05 +0.16 1.22 + 0.11 Sumter Co. F 1 5 0.83 0.68-1.01 +0.78-0.11 1.85 + 0.15 Tift Co. F 1 5 0.85 0.70-1.03 +0.80-0.09 1.96 + 0.16 Methomyl Tift Co. F 1 5 89.08 68.49-121.55 +71.23 +52.31 1.36 + 0.13 Permethrin Tift Co. F 1 5 2.18 1.20-5.50 - +1.28 1.04 + 0.17 *See text concerning an abnormally low value for cypermethrin in 2001 183
Table 4. LD 90 's for various insecticides against larval Helicoverpa zea (CEW) at 72 hr post-treatment. 2003. Chemical Acephate Gen. No. Reps. LD 90 (:g/g larval wt.) 95% C.I. 2001 avg Slope + SE Berrien Co. F 1 5 523.45 304.52-1,132.88-2,156.50 +45.32 1.10 + 0.11 Burke Co. F 1 5 165.64 115.77-266.26-2,514.31-312.49 1.44 + 0.12 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 276.21 183.92-478.40-2403.74-201.92 1.35 + 0.12 Irwin Co. F 1 3 114.33 73.64-216.24-2,565.62-363.80 1.40 + 0.16 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 78.95 57.76-118.91-2,601.00-399.18 1.58 + 0.14 Sumter Co. F 1 5 126.51 70.19-357.24-2,553.44-351.62 1.62 + 0.22 Cypermethrin Tift Co. F 1 5 282.20 195.29-461.20-2397.75-195.93 1.54 + 0.13 * Berrien Co. F 1 5 13.34 9.16-22.03 +9.67 +7.62 1.48 + 0.13 Burke Co. F 1 5 5.56 3.99-8.57 +1.89-0.16 1.52 + 0.13 Colquitt Co. F 1 5 14.80 9.96-25.22 +11.13 +9.08 1.42 + 0.12 Irwin Co. F 1 3 2.34 1.67-3.76-1.33-3.38 1.92 + 0.22 Montgomery Co. F 1 5 12.38 8.01-22.53 +8.71 +6.66 1.22 + 0.11 Sumter Co. F 1 5 4.07 3.08-5.83 +0.40-1.65 1.85 + 0.15 Methomyl Permethrin Tift Co. F 1 5 3.84 2.94-5.42 +0.17-1.88 1.96 + 0.16 Tift Co. F 1 5 776.08 467.08-1,600.33 +33.40-1,172.63 1.36 + 0.13 Tift Co. F 1 5 36.77 11.38-517.27 - +26.56 1.04 + 0.17 *See text concerning an abnormally low value for cypermethrin in 2001 184
Table 5. Percent survival at 24 hr post-treatment of Tift Co. adult Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea in glass vial cypermethrin bioassays. Tifton, GA, 2003. Dosage (:g/vial) No. of trials H. zea H. virescens Total No. of moths % Survival + SD No. of trials Total No. of moths % Survival + SD 10 5 2.5 1.25 0 7 85 0 8 86 3.2 + 4.2 9 109 30.0 + 2.4 10 155 29.3 + 5.2 7 85 48.2 + 2.7 9 112 46.6 + 3.5 2 22 39.4 + 1.3 0 0 --- 8 95 95.7 + 0.1 10 135 70.9 + 2.3 185