DOPPLER HEMODYNAMICS (1) QUANTIFICATION OF PRESSURE GRADIENTS and INTRACARDIAC PRESSURES

Similar documents
P = 4V 2. IVC Dimensions 10/20/2014. Comprehensive Hemodynamic Evaluation by Doppler Echocardiography. The Simplified Bernoulli Equation

Echo Doppler Assessment of Right and Left Ventricular Hemodynamics.

Comprehensive Hemodynamics By Doppler Echocardiography. The Echocardiographic Swan-Ganz Catheter.

HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT

An Integrated Approach to Study LV Diastolic Function

Hemodynamic Assessment. Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics

Choose the grading of diastolic function in 82 yo woman

M-Mode Echocardiography Is it still Alive? Itzhak Kronzon, MD,FASE. Sampling Rate M-Mode: 1800 / sec 2D: 30 / sec

Diastolic Heart Function: Applying the New Guidelines Case Studies

Doppler Basic & Hemodynamic Calculations

The Doppler Examination. Katie Twomley, MD Wake Forest Baptist Health - Lexington

Diastolic Function Assessment Practical Ways to Incorporate into Every Echo

E/Ea is NOT an essential estimator of LV filling pressures

Diastolic Function Assessment New Guideline Update Practical Approach

Quantification of Mitral Stenosis: Planimetry, pressure Half time, Continuity Common Errors

Case Reviews: Hemodynamic Calculations in Valvular Regurgitation

LV geometric and functional changes in VHD: How to assess? Mi-Seung Shin M.D., Ph.D. Gachon University Gil Hospital

The Patient with Atrial Fibrilation

Aortic Stenosis: Spectrum of Disease, Low Flow/Low Gradient and Variants

Evalua&on)of)Le-)Ventricular)Diastolic) Dysfunc&on)by)Echocardiography:) Role)of)Ejec&on)Frac&on)

Constriction vs Restriction Case-based Discussion

Diastolic Function: What the Sonographer Needs to Know. Echocardiographic Assessment of Diastolic Function: Basic Concepts 2/8/2012

MITRAL STENOSIS. Joanne Cusack

좌심실수축기능평가 Cardiac Function

OPTIMIZING ECHO ACQUISTION FOR STRAIN AND DIASTOLOGY

Advanced Applica,on of Point- of- Care Echocardiography in Cri,cal Care. Dr. Mark Tutschka Dr. Rob ArnAield

Congenital. Unicuspid Bicuspid Quadricuspid

Swan Song: Echocardiography as a Pulmonary Artery Catheter? Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine

Valvular Regurgitation: Can We Do Better Than Colour Doppler?

Diastology Disclosures: None. Dias2011:1

Appendix II: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY ANALYSIS

Tricuspid and Pulmonary Valve Disease

What are the best diagnostic tools to quantify aortic regurgitation?

MAKING SENSE OF MODERATE GRADIENTS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC AORTIC STENOSIS

Basic Approach to the Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Diastolic Function

Pericardial Disease: Case Examples. Echo Fiesta 2017

Adel Hasanin Ahmed 1

Prosthetic valve dysfunction: stenosis or regurgitation

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

Right Heart Catheterization. Franz R. Eberli MD Chief of Cardiology Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich

Right Ventricle Steven J. Lester MD, FACC, FRCP(C), FASE Mayo Clinic, Arizona

Echo in Pulmonary HTN

Dobutamine Stress testing In Low Flow, Low EF, Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis Case Studies

Diastolic Heart Failure

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

British Society of Echocardiography

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DATA REPORT FORM

ASCeXAM / ReASCE. Practice Board Exam Questions Monday Morning

Echo-Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Michel Slama Amiens France

Μαρία Μπόνου Διευθύντρια ΕΣΥ, ΓΝΑ Λαϊκό

Stage of Valvular AS. Outline 10/14/16. Low-flow and Other Challenges to the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis. Severe AS

Marti McCulloch, BS, MBA, RDCS, FASE Houston, Texas

Usually we DON T need to go beyond the gradient

10/1/2016. Constrictive Pericarditis Unique Hemodynamics. What s New in Pericardial Disease? Case-based Discussion

Echocardiography. Guidelines for Valve and Chamber Quantification. In partnership with

SONOGRAPHER & NURSE LED VALVE CLINICS

Left ventricular diastolic function and filling pressure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction by Doppler and 2D Speckle-tracking Imaging in Patients with Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

Echocardiographic evaluation of mitral stenosis

Imaging in Heart Failure: A Multimodality Approach. Thomas Ryan, MD

MR echo case. N.Koutsogiannis Department of Cardiology University Hospital Of Patras

Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation

TAVR: Echo Measurements Pre, Post And Intra Procedure

Constrictive Pericarditis

Quantification of MR

Doppler and Hemodynamics Muhamed Saric and Itzhak Kronzon

ECHO HAWAII. Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease. Not only ischemia! Cardiomyopathy. Prosthetic Valve. Diastolic Dysfunction

Aortic Stenosis: LVOT Obstruction

Tricuspid and Pulmonary Valve Disease

Echocardiography: Guidelines for Valve Quantification

RVOTO adult and post-op

Diastology State of The Art Assessment

Ref 1. Ref 2. Ref 3. Ref 4. See graph

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging Advance Access published July 18, 2016

Diastole is Not a Single Entity Four Components of Diastolic Dysfunction

Quantitation of Aortic Regurgitation ASCeXAM / ReASCE Review Course

How to Assess Diastolic Dysfunction?

Disclosures Rebecca T. Hahn, MD, FASE

Right Heart Hemodynamics: Echo-Cath Discrepancies

Indicator Mild Moderate Severe

Bogdan A. Popescu. University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania. EAE Course, Bucharest, April 2010

NEW GUIDELINES. A Guideline Protocol for the Echocardiographic assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction

Effect of Heart Rate on Tissue Doppler Measures of E/E

Stress Testing in Valvular Disease

Diastolic Function Overview

25 different brand names >44 different models Sizes mm

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch or Prosthetic Valve Stenosis?

Valve Disease Board Review Questions

How to Assess and Treat Obstructive Lesions

ICE: Echo Core Lab-CRF

Imaging Assessment of Aortic Stenosis/Aortic Regurgitation

Emergency Echo, Emergency Setting, ABCD Approach

Quantitative Doppler echocardiography

New murmur: acute valvular regurgitations. A.Pasquet, MD,PhD. UCL -Cliniques Saint Luc

Comprehensive Echo Assessment of Aortic Stenosis

Strain/Untwisting/Diastolic Suction

The Fontan circulation. Folkert Meijboom

Relevant Financial Relationship(s) Off Label Usage. None. None

HOW IMPORTANT ARE THESE ECHO MEASUREMENTS ANYWAY?

FUNDAMENTALS OF HEMODYNAMICS, VASOACTIVE DRUGS AND IABP IN THE FAILING HEART

Transcription:

THORAXCENTRE DOPPLER HEMODYNAMICS (1) QUANTIFICATION OF PRESSURE GRADIENTS and INTRACARDIAC PRESSURES J. Roelandt

DOPPLER HEMODYNAMICS Intracardiac pressures and pressure gradients Volumetric measurement (flow) - stroke volume (SV) - regurgitant volume/fraction (RV/RF) Valve orifice areas - stenotic orifice area (AVA, MVA) - (effective) regurgitant orifice area (EROA)

Quantification of pressure gradients Simplified Bernouilli equation: Pressure gradient (in mmhg) = 4(Vmax)²

Evaluation of RV Systolic Pressure RV systolic pressure = TR gradient + RA pressure Vmax TR gradient RV PA RA RAP 0

Assessing Hemodynamics RA pressure (using IVC size) Clinical: CVP RA pressure = 5 mmhg RA pressure > 15 mmhg

Tricuspid regurg. Patient # 1 This 40 yo man has a TR Vmax of 3 m/sec. 3 m/s IVC diameter 15 mm. Respiration change > 50%. What is his estimated RV pressure? 1. 30-35 mmhg 2. 36-40 mmhg 3. 41-45 mmhg 4. 46-50 mmhg 5. > 50 mmhg

Tricuspid regurg. Patient # 1 This 40 yo man has a TR Vmax of 3 m/s. 3 m/s 3x3x4 = 36mmHg IVC diameter 15 mm. Respiration change > 50%. What is his estimated RV pressure? 1. 30-35 mmhg 2. 36-40 mmhg 3. 41-45 mmhg 4. 46-50 mmhg 5. > 50 mmhg (Estimated RAP = 5 mmhg)

Evaluation of RV Diastolic Pressure In the absence of TS: RV diastolic pressure = RA pressure In the presence of TS: RV diastolic pressure = RA pressure - TS gradient

Evaluation of PA Systolic Pressure PA systolic pressure = TR gradient + RA pressure In the presence of PS: PA systolic pressure = RV systolic pressure - PS gradient 16 mmhg 2 m/s

Evaluation of PA end-diastolic pressure PA end-diastolic pressure = PR gradient + RA(V) end-diastolic pressure

CW Doppler of Pulmonic Valve Flow 2.5 m/sec The study suggests: 1. Severe PS 2. Right heart failure 3. Pulmonary hypertension 4. Constrictive Pericarditis

CW Doppler of Pulmonic Valve Flow 2.5 m/sec Answer: Pulmonary hypertension Note the end-diastolic gradient of 2.5 m/sec, indicating a gradient of 25 mmhg between the PA and RV

CW Doppler of MR Jet BP 120/80 mmhg. MR velocity is 7.7 m/sec The most likely diagnosis is: 1. Aortic stenosis 2. Aortic insufficiency 3. High cardiac output 4. Pulmonary hypertension

CW Doppler of MR Jet BP 120/80 mmhg. MR velocity is 7.7 m/sec Answer : Severe aortic stenosis

CW Doppler of MR Jet BP 120/80 mmhg. MR velocity is 7.7 m/sec Ao gradient LV Peak systolic LVP Peak systolic BP Ao LA The velocity of the MR jet indicates an LV-LA gradient of 237 mmhg; therefore the aortic gradient is at least 117 mmhg.

Evaluation of LV Systolic Pressure In pts without valve disease: LV systolic pressure = systolic BP In pts with AS or LVOT obstr.: LV systolic pressure = systolic BP + Peak-to-Peak gradient

Aortic Valve Gradients 1. Peak-to-Peak Gradient (PP) 2. Maximum Instantaneous Gradient (MIG) 3. Mean Gradient The PP gradient is 70% of the MIG In pts with AS or LVOT obstr.: LV systolic pressure = systolic BP + Peak-to-Peak gradient Ao In pts with AR: LV end-diastolic pressure = diastolic BP - AR gradient LV

CW Doppler of Aortic Valve Flow BP is 150/80 mmhg 4 m/sec 4 m/sec 4m/sec The LV pressure is: 1. 84/16 mmhg 2. 214/44 3. 214/16 4. 195/16

CW Doppler of Aortic Valve Flow BP is 150/80 mmhg ANSWER: 4. 195/16 mmhg LV (sys) = Sys. BP (150) + 70% Ao gradient (45) = 195 mmhg 4 m/sec Ao LV 4 m/sec LV (dias) = Dias. BP (80) - Ao dias. gradient (64) = 16 mmhg

Calculation of LA pressure e = 6 cm/sec LAP = E/e + 4 e E/e = 9.2 E 120cm/sec LAP= 55/6 + 4 = 13 mmhg E = 55 cm/sec E/e = 8: LA pressure nl E/e = 15: LA pressure high

Estimating LA Pressure by E/e may be inaccurate in: Mitral stenosis Mitral annular calcification Prosthetic MV Mitral regurgitation Diffuse severe LV dysfunction

Assessment of LA pressure in pts with MS LA diastolic pressure = LVDP + transmitral gradient MV gradient 16mmHg MV gradient 4mmHg

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Study 53-year-old male with dyspnea BP 100/65 HR 70, regular No JVD Apical diastolic rumble Basal systolic ejection murmur radiating to the neck 100/65

Normal IVC Size 1.6 cm >50% Respiratory Variation 100/65

Normal IVC Size 1.6 cm >50% Respiratory Variation 6 100/65 6 6

RV Pressures RV systolic = RA pressure (6) + TR gradient (40) = 46 mm Hg 6 100/65 3.2 m/sec 6 46/6 In the absence of TS, RV diastolic pressure = RA pressure

PA Pressure Systolic = RV systolic (46) Diastolic = PR gradient (20) + RA pressure (6) = 26 mmhg 6 100/65 46/26 6 2.2 m/sec 46/6

LVEDP = aortic diastolic pressure (65) AR gradient (55) = 10 mmhg 6 100/65 46/26 3.7 m/sec 6 46/6 /10 (55 mmhg) 6 CP1007295-7

LV systolic pressure = aortic systolic pressure (100) + 70% of AV gradient (64) = 164 mmhg 6 100/65 46/26 4.8 m/sec (92mmHg) 6 6 46/6 164/10

LA pressure = LV diastolic (10) + MV mean gradient (13) = 23 mmhg 13 6 100/65 46/26 23 6 164/10 46/6 6

6 100/65 46/26 23 6 164/10 46/6 6

How to measure dp/dt? 1. Optimize CW MR jet with clear initial slope (high-filter setting 2. Decrease velocity range to max envelope from baseline to 4 m/s 3. Increase sweep speed to 100 mm/s 4. Draw horizontal lines at 1 m/s and 3 m/s 1 2 3 4 5. Draw vertical line from intercept at MR to these points 6. Measure time (ms) t

How to measure dp/dt? 1. Optimize CW MR jet with clear initial slope (high-filter setting 2. Decrease velocity range to max envelope from baseline to 4 m/s 3. Increase sweep speed to 100 mm/s 4. Draw horizontal lines at 1 m/s and 3 m/s 1 2 3 4 5. Draw vertical line from intercept at MR to these points 6. Measure time (ms) t

How to measure dp/dt? 1. Optimize CW MR jet with clear initial slope (high-filter setting 2. Decrease velocity range to max envelope from baseline to 4 m/s 3. Increase sweep speed to 100 mm/s 4. Draw horizontal lines at 1 m/s and 3 m/s 1 2 3 4 5. Draw vertical line from intercept at MR to these points 6. Measure time (ms) t

How to measure dp/dt? 1. Optimize CW MR jet with clear initial slope (high-filter setting 2. Decrease velocity range to max envelope from baseline to 4 m/s 3. Increase sweep speed to 100 mm/s 4. Draw horizontal lines at 1 m/s and 3 m/s 5. Draw vertical line from intercept at MR to these points t? 1 2 3 4 6. Measure time (ms) t

Measurement of LV dp/dt from MR jet dp/dt mmhg/sec P mmhg x 1.000 = t (msec) ECG 1 m/sec 3 m/sec MR jet 100 mm/sec = = = 4 (V 2 - V 2 ) x 1.000 2 1 t (msec) 4 (3 2-1 2 ) X 1.000 t (msec) 32.000 t (msec) t? Normal LV dp/dt = > 1000 mmhg/sec Normal t < 32 msec

Time to reach MR velocity from 1 to 3 m/sec is 25 msec. t = 25 msec dp/dt = 32.000 25 msec = = 1200 mmhg/sec

Conclusions Normal and abnormal hemodynamics can be evaluated non-invasively by Doppler Echocardiography. Invasive evaluation may be needed for details not seen on echo, or when the clinical impression is not consistent with the echo-doppler findings

Relation of E/E to PCWP Nagueh et al, 1997

Estimation of LV Filling Pressure MVF and PVF (Pozzoli et al., 1996) 1.85*DR 0.1*SF + 1.9 MVF and color M-mode 5.27*E/Pv + 4.66 (Garcia et al.,1997) MVF and TDI annulus (sinus tachycardia) 1.47*E/e + 1.55 MVF and TDI mitral annulus (atrial fibrillation) (Sohn et al.,1999) 0.82*(E/e ) + 6.49 (Nagueh et al.,1997)

Diastolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (Analyse 60-80 bpm RR intervals) (Acceleration rate E wave) DT < 150 ms E/e ratio > 15 Color M-mode: Pv < 40 cm/sec

Evaluation of LV Diastolic Pressure In the absence of MS: LVDP = approx. LA pressure In pts with AR: LV end-diastolic pressure = diastolic BP - AR gradient Ao LV