Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Similar documents
STREAM - ONE YEAR MORTALITY STRATEGIC REPERFUSION EARLY AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. STREAM 1Y AHA 2013 P Sinnaeve

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

PHARMACO-INVASIVE STRATEGY COMPARED WITH PPCI: DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOMES OF THE STREAM TRIAL

Pharmaco-Invasive Approach for STEMI

Thrombolysis in Cardiology to whom? Professor Steen D. Kristensen, MD, DMSc, FESC Department of Cardiology

The Need for Rescue PCI after Failed Fibrinolysis: Who, When and Why.

New Insights on Reperfusion Choices Implications of STREAM. Paul W Armstrong MD

STEMI 2014 YAHYA KIWAN. Consultant Cardiologist Head Of Cardiology Belhoul Specialty Hospital

The Window for Fibrinolysis. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Recommendations for criteria for STEMI systems of care: A focus on pharmacoinvasive strategies

Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Critics of Thrombolytics: Is Pre-Hospital Clot-busting Actually a Bad Thing? David Persse, MD Houston Fire Department EMS

PPCI in STEMI. ESC at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Saudi Heart Association February 21th, 2011

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

STEMI: Eight Areas of Unmet Needs

ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs)

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

SHOULD A REGIONAL STEMI CENTRE ONLY OFFER PRIMARY PCI?

STEMI Care 2014 at the Crossroads: Taking the right road

Patient Transfer. Mark de Belder The James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough

Decision for fibrinolysis or primary PCI in the prehospital phase

DISCUSSION QUESTION - 1

ACC Rockies New Role For An Old Friend: Contemporary Insights From The ECG

Thrombolysis, adjunctive pharmacology and interventions

Antithrombotic Therapy in ACS Pretreatment in STEMI. Christian W. Hamm Kerckhoff Heart & Thorax Center Bad Nauheim Germany

STEMI Presentation and Case Discussion. Case #1

Transfer in D2B. Scott D Friedman, MD FACC Medical Director, Cardiology Services Shore Health System of Maryland. The Problem

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

The restoration of coronary flow after an

9/24/2013. Thrombolytics in 2013: Never Say Never. September 19 th, 2013 Scott M Lilly, MD PhD. Clinical Case

Pathophysiology of ACS

Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction

UPDATE ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES. Dr. Wayne Tymchak April 7, 2017

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Optimal antithrombotic therapy:

From interventional cardiology to cardio-neurology. A new subspeciality

M/39 CC D. => peak CKMB (12 hr later) ng/ml T.chol/TG/HDL/LDL 180/150/48/102 mg/dl #

Update on the management of STEMI. Elliot Rapaport, M.D. San Francisco, CA December 14, 2007

STEMI Stents What next? Arshad Khan - HNE Clinical Research Fellow. Supervisors: Prof Boyle and Attia.

Primary PCI State of the Art. A/Prof Michael Nguyen Fremantle Hospital/Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Australia JCR Meeting Busan 2014

Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

The Role of DHMC as an ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Center in a Regional STEMI Care Network:

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is the consequence of

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Rescue PCI Versus a Conservative Approach for Failed Fibrinolysis in Patients with STEMI

The role of pre hospital thrombolysis. Aaron Frimerman Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Hadera Israel

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

Subsequent management and therapies

Downloaded from:

Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular disorders. main/0202_new 02/03/06. Search date August 2004 Nicholas Danchin and Eric Durand

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (STEMI): DECREASING THE TIME TO TREATMENT IN THE ED

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

Coronary Interventions Indications, Treatment Options and Outcomes

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Thrombus Aspiration before PCI: Routine Mandatory. Professor Clinical Cardiology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam

Improving STEMI outcomes in Denmark. Michael Rahbek Schmidt, MD, PhD. Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark

REVIEW OF FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY IN STEMI

STEMI: Newer Aspects in Pharmacological Treatment

PCI Strategies After Fibrinolytic Therapy

OUTCOME OF THROMBOLYTIC AND NON- THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Management of STEMI in era of Reperfusion. Eagles Peter Moyer, MD, MPH Medical Director Boston EMS, Fire and Police

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI

Critical Review Form Therapy Objectives: Methods:

Registry and benchmarking as tool for Quality assessment in STEMI patients

Andreas Baumbach Bristol Heart Institute Bristol Royal Infirmary. London 27/1/2005

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

Clopidogrel When For What For How Long. T Benjanuwattra Chiang Mai Heart Cent

Risk Stratification of ACS Patients. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD University of Leuven, Belgium

STEMI ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

Prise en charge du SCA ST + en urgence. 9803mo01, 1

STEMI: Evolving Early Therapies of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.

Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI)

Acute coronary syndromes

Acute Coronary Syndrome: Interventional Strategy

NEBRASKA STEMI CONFERENCE 2015 Dr. Doug Kosmicki. 2013, American Heart Association

Management of Cardiogenic shock. Prof. Christian JM Vrints

Intraluminal Thrombus in Facilitated Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

SHOULD BETA BLOCKERS BE USED ROUTINELY IN POST MI PATIENTS WITH PRESERVED LV FUNCTION?

PRIMARY CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION - A COMPARATIVE STUDY AT QUEEN ALIA HEART INSTITUTE

Should All Patients Be Treated with Ace-inh /ARB after STEMI with Preserved LV Function?

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

Guideline for STEMI. Reperfusion at a PCI-Capable Hospital

Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction* American College of Chest Physicians Evidence- Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

Reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a review of the available treatment options in Kuwait

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS

Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in ACS/PCI Which one to choose? V. Voudris MD FESC FACC 2 nd Cardiology Division Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

Continuing Medical Education Post-Test

Transcription:

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium

Frans Van de Werf: Disclosures Research grants for conducting trials on reperfusion therapy: Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, SanofiAventis, Proctor&Gamble, Wyeth Speaker s bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, SanofiAventis, Merck, AZ Advisory board: Boehringer Ingelheim, Menarini, GSK, Merck, AZ, The Medicines Company 12/10/2013

The Benefit of Reperfusion therapy for STEMI is very much time dependent! 12/10/2013

Progression of Cell Death versus Time after Coronary Occlusion in Dogs AP AP AP 40 minutes 3 hours 96 hours = Nonischemic = Ischemic (Viable) = Necrotic Reimer and Jennings, Lab Invest 1979; 40: 633-44 12/10/2013

Salvageable Ischemic Myocardium with Respect to the Duration of Ischemia % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 40 min 3 hours 6 hours Duration of occlusion Reimer and Jennings, Lab Invest 1979; 40: 633-44 12/10/2013

The Importance of Time to Reperfusion Tiefenbrunn AJ, Sobel BE. Circulation 1992; 85: 2311-5. 12/10/2013

Absolute Benefitt per 1,000 Treated Patients The Importance of Time to Reperfusion A Meta-analysis of 50,246 Pts in placebo controlled trials of Lytic Therapy 80 60 40 20 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Boersma E, et al. Lancet. 1996; 348: 771-5 Time to Treatment 12/10/2013

Primary PCI : Time to treatment and 1-year mortality as continuous function. Every 30 minutes increase of relative risk of 1-year mortality of 7.5 % De Luca G et al. Circulation 2004;109:1223-1225

Landmark Clinical Studies The efficacy of intravenous streptokinase. GISSI-1, Lancet 1986 The additional survival benefit with upfront aspirin in combination with streptokinase. ISIS-2, Lancet 1988 The greater survival benefit with a fibrin-specific agent (tpa) as compared with streptokinase. GUSTO-I, New Engl J Med 1993 The superiority of primary PCI over in-hospital fibrinolytic therapy,meta-analysis, Lancet 2003

Mortality % Early Mortality Rates (21-35 days) in Major Randomized STEMI trials: 1986-2006 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 13.0 GISSI-1 Control n=5,852 10.7 GISSI-1 SK n=5,860 8.0 ISIS-2 SK + Aspirin n=4,292 6.3 GUSTO-1 tpa n=10,396 3.8 3.9 ASSENT-4 Prim PCI n=838 APEX-MI Prim PCI n=2,885 1986 1986 1988 1993 2006 2006 2008 2.5 HORIZONS -AMI n=3,340 12/10/2013

The Benefit of Reperfusion ORs by Year for In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality, Stratified by Age (2003 = base) Gale C P et al. Eur Heart J 2011;eurheartj.ehr381

Time delays remain a major problem! 12/10/2013

Frequency, % On-Site Thrombolysis vs Transfer for PCI 20 15 PTCA (n = 1466) Thrombolytic therapy (n = 1443) P < 0.0001 10 P = 0.057 P < 0.0001 P = 0.049 P = 0.25 5 0 Death Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Total Stroke Haemorrhagic Stroke Death, Non-fatal Reinfarction or Stroke Keeley et al. Lancet. 2003.

Mortality in 6209 Danish Patients With STEMI Treated With Primary PCI Terkelsen, C. J. et al. JAMA 2010;304:763-771.

HORIZONS-AMI: Median Door-to-Balloon Times Blankenship et al Am J Card 2010;106:1527 12/10/2013

Multivariate predictors of longer door-to-balloon time in 2 298 pts from HORIZONS -AMI Variable Estimate SE p Value Presentation to non-angioplasty hospital 53.94 2.18 <0.001 Respiratory failure 41.55 13.79 0.003 Previous congestive heart failure 15.17 6.57 0.02 Presentation during daytime weekday hours 10.52 1.99 <0.001 Diabetes mellitus 9.30 2.75 <0.001 Previous angina 8.02 2.44 0.001 Men 7.08 2.36 0.003 Infarct-related artery: circumflex 6.26 2.02 0.002 Left ventricular ejection fraction 0.25 0.09 0.003 Blankenship et al. Am J Card 2010;106:1527

Hospitals with cath labs UNITED STATES 18.0% EUROPE 10.0% BRAZIL 5.5% CENIC REGISTRY, 2011, Brazil.

Only 55% of all PCI centres offer 24/7 PPCI service Widimsky P et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:943-957.

Door-In to Door-Out Time Among Patients Transferred for Primary PCI in the USA Distribution of median door-in to door-out (DIDO) times for 1034 hospitals reporting at least 5 patients in 2009 Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(21):1879-1886

Problems and challenges in cardiovascular emergencies

STUDY AIM A strategy of early fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography within 6-24 hours or rescue PCI if needed was compared with standard primary PCI in STEMI patients with at least 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads presenting within 3 hours of symptom onset and unable to undergo primary PCI within 1 hour. F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

PCI Hospital Ambulance/ER STUDY PROTOCOL STEMI <3 hrs from onset symptoms, PPCI <60 min not possible, 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 leads RANDOMIZATION 1:1 by IVRS, OPEN LABEL Strategy A: pharmaco-invasive Strategy B: primary PCI <75y:full dose Aspirin Clopidogrel: LD 300 mg + 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 30 mg IV + 1 mg/kg SC Q12h After 75y: 20% ½ of dose the TNK planned recruitment, the TNK dose was reduced by 50% among patients 75 years of age. Aspirin Clopidogrel: 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 0.75 mg/kg SC Q12h no lytic Antiplatelet and antithrombin treatment according to local standards ECG at 90 min: ST resolution 50% YES NO angio >6 to 24 hrs PCI/CABG if indicated immediate angio + rescue PCI if indicated Standard primary PCI Primary endpoint: composite of all cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

PATIENTS PER COUNTRY F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

MEDIAN TIMES TO TREATMENT (min) Sx onset 1st Medical contact Randomize IVRS Rx TNK 62 29 9 100 min Sx onset 1st Medical contact Randomize IVRS 78 min difference Rx PPCI 61 31 86 n=1892 1 Hour 2 Hours 178 min F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

MEDIAN TIMES TO TREATMENT (min) Sx onset 1st Medical contact Randomize IVRS Rx TNK 36% Rescue PCI at 2.2h 62 29 9 100 min 64% non-urgent cath at 17h Sx onset 1st Medical contact Randomize IVRS Rx PPCI 61 31 86 n=1892 1 Hour 2 Hours 178 min F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

TIMI FLOW RATES P<0.001 P=0.41 TIMI before PCI TIMI after PCI F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

INVASIVE PROCEDURES Pharmaco-invasive (N=944) PPCI (N=948) P-value PCI performed 80% 90% <0.001 Stents deployed 96% 96% 0.95 CABG performed 4.7% 2.1% 0.002 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Dth/Shock/CHF/ReMI (%) PRIMARY ENDPOINT TNK vs PPCI Relative Risk 0.86, 95%CI (0.68-1.09) The 95% CI of the observed incidence in the pharmaco-invasive arm would exclude a 9% relative excess compared with PPCI PPCI 14.3% TNK 12.4% p=0.24 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

SINGLE ENDPOINTS UP TO 30 DAYS Pharmaco-invasive PPCI P-value (N=944) (N=948) All cause death (43/939) 4.6% (42/946) 4.4% 0.88 Cardiac death (31/939) 3.3% (32/946) 3.4% 0.92 Congestive heart failure (57/939) 6.1% (72/943) 7.6% 0.18 Cardiogenic shock (41/939) 4.4% (56/944) 5.9% 0.13 Reinfarction (23/938) 2.5% (21/944) 2.2% 0.74 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Subgroup analyses for primary endpoint within 30 days OVERALL Age <75 years 75 years Time to randomization 0 to <2h 2h Male Female Systolic blood pressure <100 mmhg 100 to <140 mmhg 140 to <160 mmhg 160 mmhg Killip class I II-IV Anterior MI Inferior MI Other MI Relative Risk (95%CI) P(interaction) 0.63 0.81 0.71 0.16 0.23 0.06 > TNK Better PPCI Better F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Subgroup analyses for primary endpoint within 30 days Hypertension, Yes No Diabetes, Yes No Weight, <60 kg 60 to <90 kg 90 kg Place of randomization, Ambulance Community hospital TIMI Risk Score, <5 points 5 points Before Amendment After Amendment Relative Risk (95%CI) p=0.07 P(interaction) 0.34 0.24 > > 0.35 0.68 0.71 0.13 TNK Better PPCI Better F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

STROKE RATES Pharmaco-invasive PPCI P-value TOTAL POPULATION (N=1892) Total stroke 15/939 (1.60%) 5/946 (0.53%) 0.03 fatal stroke 7/939 (0.75%) 4/946 (0.42%) 0.39 Haemorrhagic stroke 9/939 (0.96%) 2/946 (0.21%) 0.04 fatal haemorrhagic stroke 6/939 (0.64%) 2/946 (0.21%) 0.18 POST AMENDMENT POPULATION (N=1503) Total stroke 9/747 (1.20%) 5/756 (0.66%) 0.30 fatal stroke 3/747 (0.40%) 4/756 (0.53%) >0.999 Haemorrhagic stroke 4/747 (0.54%) 2/756 (0.26%) 0.45 fatal haemorrhagic stroke 2/747 (0.27%) 2/756 (0.26%) >0.999 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

IN-HOSPITAL BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS Pharmaco-invasive (N=944) PPCI (N=948) P-value Major non-ich bleeding 6.5% 4.8% 0.11 Minor non-ich bleeding 21.8% 20.2% 0.40 Blood transfusions 2.9% 2.3% 0.47 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

CONCLUSIONS A strategy of fibrinolysis with bolus tenecteplase and contemporary antithrombotic therapy given before transport to a PCI-capable hospital coupled with timely coronary angiography : circumvents the need for an urgent procedure in about two thirds of fibrinolytic treated STEMI patients. is associated with a small increased risk of intracranial bleeding. is as effective as primary PCI in STEMI patients presenting within 3 hours of symptom onset who cannot undergo primary PCI within one hour of first medical contact. F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Reperfusion: Conclusions Anno 2013 Reperfusion therapy is the most effective treatment to offer to STEMI patients and is its broad application has significantly reduced case fatality rates both in studies and in the real world over the last 20 years Major efforts are still needed to shorten delay times especially in patients presenting first to facilities without a cath lab Distances,weather and traffic conditions are a frequent reason why patients can t get timely PCI Especially in patients presenting early to an ambulance system or hospital without a cath lab fibrinolytic therapy should be considered when there is any doubt about timely PCI 12/10/2013

12/10/2013

Frequency, % STE ACS Primary PCI vs In-HospitalThrombolysis : Clinical Outcomes 25 20 Short-Term Outcomes P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001 15 P = 0.0002 P = 0.0003 P < 0.0001 P = 0.0004 P < 0.0001 P = 0.0032 10 5 0 Death Death, Excluding SHOCK Data Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Recurrent Ischemia Total Stroke Haemorrhagic Stroke Major Bleed Death, Non-fatal Reinfarction, or Stroke 50 40 Long-Term Outcomes P < 0.0001 PTCA 30 P = 0.0019 P = 0.0053 P < 0.0001 Thrombolytic therapy P < 0.0001 20 10 0 Death Death, Excluding SHOCK Data Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Recurrent Ischemia - - - Total Stroke Haemorrhagic Stroke Major Bleed Death, Non-fatal Reinfarction, or Stroke Keeley and Grines Lancet. 2003. 12/10/2013