Quantification of Mitral Stenosis: Planimetry, pressure Half time, Continuity Common Errors

Similar documents
Hemodynamic Assessment. Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics

Echocardiographic evaluation of mitral stenosis

DOPPLER HEMODYNAMICS (1) QUANTIFICATION OF PRESSURE GRADIENTS and INTRACARDIAC PRESSURES

The Doppler Examination. Katie Twomley, MD Wake Forest Baptist Health - Lexington

Congenital. Unicuspid Bicuspid Quadricuspid

Diastolic Heart Function: Applying the New Guidelines Case Studies

Valvular Regurgitation: Can We Do Better Than Colour Doppler?

Bogdan A. Popescu. University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania. EAE Course, Bucharest, April 2010

MITRAL STENOSIS. Joanne Cusack

Exercise Pulmonary Hypertension predicts the Occurrence of Symptoms in Asymptomatic Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT

Dobutamine Stress testing In Low Flow, Low EF, Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis Case Studies

British Society of Echocardiography

Doppler Basic & Hemodynamic Calculations

New 3D Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation Severity. Judy Hung, MD Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA

Aortic Stenosis: Spectrum of Disease, Low Flow/Low Gradient and Variants

ASCeXAM / ReASCE. Practice Board Exam Questions Monday Morning

P = 4V 2. IVC Dimensions 10/20/2014. Comprehensive Hemodynamic Evaluation by Doppler Echocardiography. The Simplified Bernoulli Equation

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DATA REPORT FORM

OPTIMIZING ECHO ACQUISTION FOR STRAIN AND DIASTOLOGY

Choose the grading of diastolic function in 82 yo woman

Marti McCulloch, BS, MBA, RDCS, FASE Houston, Texas

Echo Doppler Assessment of Right and Left Ventricular Hemodynamics.

LUST trial. Echocardiography USER S MANUAL

Prosthetic valve dysfunction: stenosis or regurgitation

Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation

What are the best diagnostic tools to quantify aortic regurgitation?

Tricuspid and Pulmonary Valve Disease

Mitral Valve Stenosis: What do I need to know? ACC Latin American Conference 2017

Tricuspid and Pulmonary Valve Disease

Comprehensive Echo Assessment of Aortic Stenosis

MR echo case. N.Koutsogiannis Department of Cardiology University Hospital Of Patras

ASE Guidelines on Aortic Regurgitation What Do I Measure? Case Studies

Prof. JL Zamorano Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal

Case Reviews: Hemodynamic Calculations in Valvular Regurgitation

Comprehensive Hemodynamics By Doppler Echocardiography. The Echocardiographic Swan-Ganz Catheter.

How to assess ischaemic MR?

Advanced Applica,on of Point- of- Care Echocardiography in Cri,cal Care. Dr. Mark Tutschka Dr. Rob ArnAield

Direct Planimetry of Mitral Valve Regurgitation Orifice Area by Real-time 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography

Stage of Valvular AS. Outline 10/14/16. Low-flow and Other Challenges to the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis. Severe AS

Disclosures Rebecca T. Hahn, MD, FASE

Echocardiography. Guidelines for Valve and Chamber Quantification. In partnership with

Echocardiography: Guidelines for Valve Quantification

Imaging Assessment of Aortic Stenosis/Aortic Regurgitation

Quantification of MR

Back to Basics: Common Errors In Quantitation In Everyday Practice

The correlation of AVA measured by transthoracic, transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac CT

Right Ventricle Steven J. Lester MD, FACC, FRCP(C), FASE Mayo Clinic, Arizona

Affecting the elderly Requiring new approaches. Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hemodynamic Severity. Increasing prevalence Mostly degenerative

Primary Mitral Regurgitation

Appendix II: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY ANALYSIS

MAKING SENSE OF MODERATE GRADIENTS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC AORTIC STENOSIS

The production of murmurs is due to 3 main factors:

Workshop Facing the challenge of TAVI 2016

PISA Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation. Raymond Graber, MD Cardiac Anesthesia Group University Hospitals Case Medical Center 4/07/2011

Diastolic Function: What the Sonographer Needs to Know. Echocardiographic Assessment of Diastolic Function: Basic Concepts 2/8/2012

Clinical Outcome of Tricuspid Regurgitation. David Messika-Zeitoun

Swan Song: Echocardiography as a Pulmonary Artery Catheter? Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine

ECHO HAWAII. Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease. Not only ischemia! Cardiomyopathy. Prosthetic Valve. Diastolic Dysfunction

Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease. Satoshi Nakatani Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka, Japan

Echo-Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Michel Slama Amiens France

Basic Approach to the Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Diastolic Function

AIMI-HF PROCEDURE MANUAL TECHNICAL GUIDE FOR ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY. MHI Core Laboratory E. O Meara - J.C. Tardif J. Vincent, G. Grenier, C.

Aortic Stenosis: LVOT Obstruction

Diastolic Function Assessment New Guideline Update Practical Approach

TAVR TTE INTERROGATION BY ALAN MATTHEWS

Quantitative Doppler echocardiography

CHAPTER 4 AN EFFICACIOUS APPROACH FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF MITRAL REGURGITATION USING IMAGE PROCESSING AND PROXIMAL FLOW CONVERGENCE METHOD

Quantifying Aortic Regurgitation

LV geometric and functional changes in VHD: How to assess? Mi-Seung Shin M.D., Ph.D. Gachon University Gil Hospital

Blank DISCLOSURES 1/17/2017 COMPLEX VALVE CASES CHALLENGES IN EVALUATING AND MANAGING MULTIVALVULAR HEART DISEASE ECHO HAWAII 1/23/17 NONE

Diastology State of The Art Assessment

Case # 1. Page: 8. DUKE: Adams

The Patient with Atrial Fibrilation

가천의대길병원소아심장과최덕영 PA C IVS THE EVALUATION AND PRINCIPLES OF TREATMENT STRATEGY

Doppler and Hemodynamics Muhamed Saric and Itzhak Kronzon

Recommendations of the European Association of Echocardiography

Patient/prosthesis mismatch: how to evaluate and when to act?

Professors Carpentier and McGoon Mechanism, resulting from the disease Severity of regurgitation, resulting from the mechanism Echo

Three-dimensional echocardiography in the clinical world

Diastolic Heart Failure

Prof. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM

TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (TTE) An overview for Perioperative Care Dr Andrew Cluer, Sydney, Australia 2015

DISCLOSURE. Myocardial Mechanics. Relevant Financial Relationship(s) Off Label Usage

Giovanni Di Salvo MD, PhD, FESC Second University of Naples Monaldi Hospital

GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR ECHO ASSESSMENT OF DIASTOLIC FUNCTION (For full recommendation refer to the Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Guideline)

2/4/2011. Nathan Kerner, M.D.

imagine 2018 Echocardiography Today - Do, Learn, Do More, Learn More November 3-4, 2018 Georgia Technology Hotel and Conference Center

Evalua&on)of)Le-)Ventricular)Diastolic) Dysfunc&on)by)Echocardiography:) Role)of)Ejec&on)Frac&on)

PROSTHETIC VALVE BOARD REVIEW

Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Cardiomyopathies. Stephanie Coulter, MD, FACC, FASE April, 2016

Doppler-echocardiographic findings in a patient with persisting right ventricular sinusoids

When Does 3D Echo Make A Difference?

5 Working With Measurements

Quantitation of Aortic Regurgitation ASCeXAM / ReASCE Review Course

25 different brand names >44 different models Sizes mm

Revealing new insights. irotate electronic rotation and xplane adjustable biplane imaging. Ultrasound cardiology. irotate and xplane

Rest and Exercise Echocardiography in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Determinants of Exercise Peak Gradient and Predictors of Outcome

A Practical Approach to Prosthetic Valves

The production of murmurs is due to 3 main factors:

Transcription:

Quantification of Mitral Stenosis: Planimetry, pressure Half time, Continuity Common Errors Christopher J Kramer RDCS Advanced Cardiovascular Services Aurora Health Care Milwaukee, WI No Disclosures Baumgartner, H., et al JASE January 2009 How to Grade Mitral Stenosis Routine evaluation of MS severity should combine: Mean Gradient and Valve area using Planimetry and Pressure 1/2t methods. In case of discrepancy the result of planimetry is the reference measurement, except with poor acoustic windows. Continuity equation or PISA not recommended for routine use but may be useful in certain patients when standard measurements are inconclusive.

Quantification Methods Valve Area Planimetry Pressure Half Time (PHT) Continuity Equation Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) Mean Gradient Recommended Recordings Mitral Stenosis Apical window CW Doppler PW Doppler Leaflet tips Use Color Doppler to line up with MV inflow jet Parallel to Flow Parasternal short-axis MV level / longaxis Mitral Stenosis: Game Plan Normal Sinus Rhythm and Rapid Atrial Fibrillation Echocardiographic Quantification Pathophysiology of MS Narrowed MV Orifice LA Pressure Right Heart Failure RA Size RV Hypertrophy LA Size Backward Failure into Right Heart Pulmonary Edema RV Volume Pulmonary Hypertension Kinney MR & others: Comprehensive cardiac care, 7th ed. St. Louis, 1991, Mosby.

Case #1 49 year old female History significant for rheumatic fever Vitals 72 bpm Sinus rhythm BP 132/80 Grade 1/6 diastolic rumble Planimetry Planimetry Minimum Diameter = 1.2cm Planimetry Minimum Diameter = 1.2cm

Planimetry Area = 1.8cm 2 Mitral Stenosis Severity Guidelines Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm 2 ) PHT(msec) Mild < 4 mmhg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5-9 mmhg 1.1-1.5 150-219 Severe > 10 mmhg < 1.0 > 220 Pressure Half Time Pressure Half Time MV PHT= 120ms MVA= 1.8cm 2 Velocity V 1 PHT 0.7V 1 Time Time for the pressure to drop in half

Mitral Stenosis Severity Guidelines Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm 2 ) PHT(msec) Mild < 4 mmhg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5-9 mmhg 1.1-1.5 150-219 Severe > 10 mmhg < 1.0 > 220 Continuity Equation SV X MVA MVA= LVOT SV /MV TVI CP935823-29 Continuity Equation LVOT= 2.1cm LVOT TVI = 25cm Continuity Equation MV Peak =1.5m/s MV TVI = 52cm

( Continuity Equation )2 LVOT TVI = 2.1cm x.785 x 25cm LVOT= MV TVI = 52cm =1.7cm 2 Mitral Stenosis Severity Guidelines Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm 2 ) PHT(msec) Mild < 4 mmhg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5-9 mmhg 1.1-1.5 150-219 Severe > 10 mmhg < 1.0 > 220 θ V a PISA r MVA = 6.28 x r 2 x Aliasing velocity x θ MV peak velocity 180 V p Rifkin RD et al. JACC 1995 PISA

PISA θ=150 o MVA = 6.28 x (1.1cm) 2 x (39cm/s) x 150 150cm/s 180 =1.6cm 2 Mitral Stenosis Severity Guidelines Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm 2 ) PHT(msec) Mild < 4 mmhg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5-9 mmhg 1.1-1.5 150-219 Severe > 10 mmhg < 1.0 > 220 Mean Pressure Gradient MV Peak =1.5m/s MV Mean = 4mmHg Mitral Stenosis Severity Guidelines Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm 2 ) PHT(msec) Mild < 4 mmhg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5-9 mmhg 1.1-1.5 150-219 Severe > 10 mmhg < 1.0 > 220

Quantification Case #1 Planimetry PHT MVA= 1.8cm 2 Mild MS MVA= 1.8cm 2 Mild MS Continuity Equation MVA= 1.7cm 2 PISA MVA= 1.6cm 2 Mild MS Mean Gradient Mild MS Mild MS Case #2 69 year old female History significant for Rheumatic fever Vitals 110bpm Atrial fibrillation BP 140/84 Planimetry Planimetry

Planimetry Minimum Area=1.2cm2 Diameter=.85cm Pressure Half Time Pressure Half Time MVPV=2.4m/s MVPV=2.2m/s MVPV=2.2m/s MVPV=2.6m/s MVPV=2.6m/s MVPV=2.6m/s PHT=188ms PHT=177ms PHT=196ms PHT=186ms PHT=185ms PHT=191ms MVA=1.2cm2 MVA=1.2cm2 MVA=1.1cm2 MVA=1.2cm2 MVA=1.2cm2 MVA=1.2cm2 Average MVAPHT=1.2cm2 Continuity Equation LVOTDiam=1.9cm PV=1.3m/s PV=1.2m/s PV=1.3m/s AverageTVI=18cm TVI=19cm TVI=20cm TVI=20cm

Continuity Equation MV PV =2.4m/s MV PV =2.2m/s MV PV =2.2m/s MV PV =2.6m/s MV PV =2.6m/s MV PV =2.6m/s MnGr=14mmHg MnGr=11mmHg MnGr=11mmHg MnGr=16mmHg MnGr=15mmHg MnGr=12mmHg MV TVI =34cm MV TVI =43cm MV TVI =69cm MV TVI =52cm MV TVI =70cm MV TVI =68cm Average MV TVI =56cm Continuity Equation MVA= (1.9cm) 2 x.785 x 19 56cm =.96cm 2 PISA PISA 1.1cm θ=165 o

PISA MVA = 6.28 x (1.1cm) 2 x (34cm/s) x165 240cm/s 180 =.99cm 2 Mean Pressure Gradient MV PV =2.4m/s MV PV =2.2m/s MV PV =2.2m/s MV PV =2.6m/s MV PV =2.6m/s MV PV =2.6m/s MnGr=14mmHg MnGr=11mmHg MnGr=11mmHg MnGr=16mmHg MnGr=15mmHg MnGr=12mmHg MV TVI =34cm MV TVI =43cm MV TVI =69cm MV TVI =52cm MV TVI =70cm MV TVI =68cm Average Mean Gradient=13mmHg Mitral Stenosis Severity Guidelines Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm 2 ) PHT(msec) Mild < 4 mmhg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5-9 mmhg 1.1-1.5 150-219 Severe > 10 mmhg < 1.0 > 220 NOTE: Heart rate dependent! Case# 2 Quantification Planimitery PHT MVA=1.2cm 2 Moderate MS MVA=1.2cm 2 Moderate MS Continuity Equation MVA=.96cm 2 Severe MS PISA MVA=.99cm 2 Severe MS Mean Gradient Mean PG=13mmHg Severe MS

Indicators LA Volume (ml/m2) RVSP RV Size RV Function Average TR Velocity=3.4m/s MV 3D MV 3DQ Take Home Points Use all tools in your toolbox, Mean Gradient, MVA; P1/2 time, Planimetry Know your limitations of MS Always record the HR when reporting the mean pressure gradient Measure a minimum of 5 beats when atrial fibrillation is present Incorporate the supportive indicators when determining the severity of stenosis