The Need for Rescue PCI after Failed Fibrinolysis: Who, When and Why.

Similar documents
The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

STEMI Care 2014 at the Crossroads: Taking the right road

STREAM - ONE YEAR MORTALITY STRATEGIC REPERFUSION EARLY AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. STREAM 1Y AHA 2013 P Sinnaeve

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

New Insights on Reperfusion Choices Implications of STREAM. Paul W Armstrong MD

Pharmaco-Invasive Approach for STEMI

Thrombolysis in Cardiology to whom? Professor Steen D. Kristensen, MD, DMSc, FESC Department of Cardiology

PHARMACO-INVASIVE STRATEGY COMPARED WITH PPCI: DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOMES OF THE STREAM TRIAL

SHOULD A REGIONAL STEMI CENTRE ONLY OFFER PRIMARY PCI?

STEMI 2014 YAHYA KIWAN. Consultant Cardiologist Head Of Cardiology Belhoul Specialty Hospital

The Window for Fibrinolysis. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Recommendations for criteria for STEMI systems of care: A focus on pharmacoinvasive strategies

ACC Rockies New Role For An Old Friend: Contemporary Insights From The ECG

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Decision for fibrinolysis or primary PCI in the prehospital phase

The role of pre hospital thrombolysis. Aaron Frimerman Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Hadera Israel

STEMI: Eight Areas of Unmet Needs

Improving the Outcomes of

Transfer in D2B. Scott D Friedman, MD FACC Medical Director, Cardiology Services Shore Health System of Maryland. The Problem

Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Oral anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of ACS patients the cost of reducing death!

DISCUSSION QUESTION - 1

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Critics of Thrombolytics: Is Pre-Hospital Clot-busting Actually a Bad Thing? David Persse, MD Houston Fire Department EMS

ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs)

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Recognizing the High Risk NSTEMI Patient for Early Appropriate Therapy

Optimal antithrombotic therapy:

Update Guidelines in STEMI Management: Focus on Logistic and System Approach to Reperfusion Therapy

Primary PCI State of the Art. A/Prof Michael Nguyen Fremantle Hospital/Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Australia JCR Meeting Busan 2014

Regional STEMI Transfer Systems: the Mayo and NC RACE Experiences

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

Methods Individual patient data from CAPTIM (n = 840, ) and the more recent WEST trial (n = 328, ) were pooled.

Culprit PCI vs MultiVessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction

NEBRASKA STEMI CONFERENCE 2015 Dr. Doug Kosmicki. 2013, American Heart Association

Controversies on Primary angioplasty in STEMI

Treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in China: Where are we?

PPCI in STEMI. ESC at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Saudi Heart Association February 21th, 2011

Acute Coronary Syndromes

Andreas Baumbach Bristol Heart Institute Bristol Royal Infirmary. London 27/1/2005

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

STEMI Linee guida ESC Maddalena Lettino, Italy

Fibrinolysis or Primary PCI in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

STEMI Oct. 31, 2011 Core Curriculum Adjunctive/Conjunctive pharmacological therapy

Approach to Multi Vessel disease with STEMI

Patient Transfer. Mark de Belder The James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Cindy L. Grines MD FACC FSCAI

William D. Salerno, M.D. Director, Coronary Care Unit Hackensack University Medical Center Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, UMDNJ

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is the consequence of

M/39 CC D. => peak CKMB (12 hr later) ng/ml T.chol/TG/HDL/LDL 180/150/48/102 mg/dl #

Management of STEMI in era of Reperfusion. Eagles Peter Moyer, MD, MPH Medical Director Boston EMS, Fire and Police

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

UPDATE ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES. Dr. Wayne Tymchak April 7, 2017

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cindy Baker, MD FACC Director Peripheral Vascular Interventions Division of Cardiovascular Medicine

REVIEW OF FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY IN STEMI

The Role of Enoxaparin Across ACS Spectrum

PCI Strategies After Fibrinolytic Therapy

Thrombolysis, adjunctive pharmacology and interventions

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Rescue PCI Versus a Conservative Approach for Failed Fibrinolysis in Patients with STEMI

Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mechanisms and Clinical Application Jian Liu, MD FACC FESC FSCAI Chief Phy

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

La fibrinolyse est- elle sous- u1lisée en France?

STEMI Stents What next? Arshad Khan - HNE Clinical Research Fellow. Supervisors: Prof Boyle and Attia.

HIP ATTACK Trial: Can we improve outcomes after a hip fracture with accelerated surgery? PJ Devereaux, MD, PhD

The restoration of coronary flow after an

International Journal of Biomedicine 8(1) (2018) ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Cardiology

Research. Efficacy and safety of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin: a pooled analysis of ASSENT-3 and -3 PLUS data

Joo-Yong Hahn, MD/PhD

Earlier reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation Myocardial infarction by use of helicopter

I have no financial relationships to disclose

Update on the management of STEMI. Elliot Rapaport, M.D. San Francisco, CA December 14, 2007

Improving STEMI outcomes in Denmark. Michael Rahbek Schmidt, MD, PhD. Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark

2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation

Prise en charge du SCA ST + en urgence. 9803mo01, 1

The Burden & Management of Ischaemic Heart Disease in Kenya

Platelet function testing to guide P2Y 12 -inhibitor treatment in ACS patients after PCI: insights from a national program in Hungary

SHOULD BETA BLOCKERS BE USED ROUTINELY IN POST MI PATIENTS WITH PRESERVED LV FUNCTION?

Should All Patients Be Treated with Ace-inh /ARB after STEMI with Preserved LV Function?

Thrombus Aspiration before PCI: Routine Mandatory. Professor Clinical Cardiology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

Intraluminal Thrombus in Facilitated Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Timing of angiography for high- risk ACS

Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

ST-Elevation MI: Update on Bivalirudin and DES

Patient and System Time Delay

An update on the management of UA / NSTEMI. Michael H. Crawford, MD

The Role of DHMC as an ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Center in a Regional STEMI Care Network:

ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): Optimal Antiplatelet and Anti-thrombotic Therapy in the Emergency Department

Antithrombotic Therapy in ACS Pretreatment in STEMI. Christian W. Hamm Kerckhoff Heart & Thorax Center Bad Nauheim Germany

Transcription:

Implementing the pharmacoinvasive strategy in STEMI The Need for Rescue PCI after Failed Fibrinolysis: Who, When and Why. 7:20-7:40 Robert C. Welsh, MD, FRCPC, FESC, FAHA, FACC Professor of Medicine Director, Adult Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology Co-Chair, Vital Heart Response Co-director, U of A Chest Pain Program

Disclosures: (previous 5 years) Research funding: Abbott Vascular, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Portola, Regado, Roche, sanofi aventis Consultant/honorarium: Abbott Vascular, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Roche, sanofiaventis

Outline : Premises 1. Optimal STEMI care requires a dual reperfusion strategy (primary PCI and fibrinolysis) 2. Following fibrinolysis the pharmacoinvasive strategy improves outcomes and should be employed with: 1. Clinical vigilance for reperfusion success and urgent catheterization in the setting of reperfusion failure (rescue) or with early recurrent ischemia 2. Following successful pharmacological reperfusion a scheduled early angiography (6-24 hours) is warranted 3. An example of a real world pharmacoinvasive strategy - Vital Heart Response

Reperfusion Therapy Impact of Time to Treatment Classic Experiments in Animal Models -Ischemic necrosis begins within minutes of coronary occlusion -Reperfusion within the first hour salvages nearly two-thirds of the myocardium at risk thereafter abrupt declining such that little or no myocardial salvage is evident after three to six hours of occlusion. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, et al. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977; 56:786 794.

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Door-to-Balloon Time and Mortality in Patients Hospitalized with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Is 90 Minutes Fast Enough? Time (min) 30-d Mortality 1-Year Mortality 30 day mortality Adjusted Adjusted 30 7.3 (6.1 8.6) 8.8 (7.0 10.7) 60 8.8 (7.8 9.9) 12.9 (11.6 14.2) 90 10.7 (9.8 11.6) 16.6 (15.6 17.6) N=1932 120 12.8 (12.0 13.5) 19.9 (19.1 20.8) 150 15.0 (14.3 15.7) 22.9 (22.0 23.7) 1 year mortality 180 17.2 (16.4 18.0) 25.5 (24.5 26.5) 210 19.4 (18.3 20.4) 27.7 (26.5 28.9) 240 21.4 (20.1 22.6) 29.5 (28.1 30.9) 270 23.2 (21.7 24.6) 30.9 (29.4 32.5) N=1932 Rathore SS, et al, Am J Cardiol. 2009 Nov 1;104(9):1198-203

Time (min) 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 145 114 96 Q3 10 STEMI Door-to-Balloon Times * Transfer In & Non-Transfer In Patients (not total ischemic times) >100,000 patients in >250 hospitals 68 61 53 141 117 98 Q4 10 69 62 55 Transfer in DTB Times 145 114 93 Caveat Total Ischemic Times Unreported Q1 11 71 64 57 149 119 97 71 64 57 Q2 11 Non-Transfer in DTB Times ACTION Registry-GWTG DATA: July 1, 2010 June 30, 2011

Baseline patient risk modulates optimal mode of reperfusion DANAMI 2: 3 Year Mortality 26% of patients high-risk (TIMI 5) FL 36.2% PPCI 25.3% P=0.02 FL=Fibrinolysis PPCI= Primary PCI TIMI <5 = 74% PPCI 8.0% FL 5.6% P=0.11 n = 1134 n = 393 Thune et al. Circulation 2005

A pooled analysis of an early fibrinolytic strategy versus primary PCI from CAPTIM and WEST One year survival by time to treatment p=0.021 FL<2h versus PCI<2h Westerhout et al, Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):283-90

Premise 1 - Summary Primary PCI is the dominant reperfusion strategy but... 1. Timely primary PCI remains improbable for many STEMI patients despite improved time to treatment in regional STEMI programs Primary PCI is multi-disciplinary, time-sensitive, and its success if based on the operators experience 2. The majority of benefit of primary PCI over fibrinolysis is achieved in the approximately 25% of patients presenting with high risk features 3. The acceptable delay for withholding pharmacological reperfusion in anticipation of PCI is not static and is dependent upon individual patient and temporal characteristics In patients with clinical characteristics that predict complications of pharmacological reperfusion; a longer delay to Primary PCI is justified In early presenting patients (<3 hours) the acceptable delay is abbreviated

Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Definition Following evidence based fibrinolysis with appropriate conjunctive anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy; Failure to Successfully Reperfuse Rescue angiography assessed as <50% ST resolution in the worst lead ST elevation at 90 minutes (60-90 minutes) Hemodynamic instability or refractory ventricular arrhythmia Urgent Angiography following successful reperfusion early (< 6 hours) recurrent ischemia Successful Reperfusion Scheduled angiography within 6-24 hours following successful fibrinolysis (>50% ST resolution in worst lead ST elevation) Armstrong et al, Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):30-35

Pharmaco-invasive strategy Clinical endpoints at 6 12 months. Borgia F et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2156-2169

Pharmaco-invasive strategy Safety endpoints. Borgia F et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2156-2169

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Dth/Shock/CHF/ReMI (%) PRIMARY ENDPOINT TNK vs PPCI Relative Risk 0.86, 95%CI (0.68-1.09) PPCI 14.3% TNK 12.4% p=0.24 All cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30 Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

Premise 2 Summary 1. Following fibrinolysis the pharmacoinvasive approach improves outcomes compared to a conservative approach 2. A fibrinolytic pharmacoinvasive strategy is associated with similar outcomes to timely primary PCI

Reperfusion Failure Indication for Rescue PCI 6 mm 12 mm Baseline ECG Random ization TNK 90 min Post TNK ECG - 11-0 0 97 08:40 08:51 08:51 10:28 22 Aug 2010 ECG Core Lab

Unpublished analysis Is the need for rescue PCI after fibrinolysis predictable? 1106 STEMI patients receiving FL from TRANSFER-AMI (n=885) and WEST (n=221) were combined to identify clinical variables and outcomes associated with Rescue PCI N=1106 Non-rescue PCI Rescue PCI P value N=772 N=334 Age year (IQR) 57.0 (50-66) 57.0 (50-67) 0.44 Independent predictors of Rescue PCI were: Males % 79.8 67.9 0.79 Diabetes % 11.9 16.2 0.055 Dyslipidemia % 27.8 25.9 0.55 Prior MI OR 1.58 (0.99-2.52, p0.05), symptom to fibrinolysis OR 1.10 (1.04-1.17, p0.002) and anterior MI OR 1.18 (0.88-1.58, p0.23) however the discriminatory power was poor (c-index 0.56). Prior Angina % 13.6 15.3 0.46 Prior MI % 9.2 12.0 0.16 Anterior MI location % 50.7 53.3 0.41 Time from symptom onset to FL (hrs) 1.9 1.9 0.54 Time from FL to PCI (hrs) 6.6 (n=576/772) 3.7 (n=298/334) <0.001

Guideline adjudicated fibrinolytic failure: Incidence, findings and management in a contemporary clinical trial Buller CE et al., Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):121-7.

Freedom from Death, remi, CHF, Stroke Success of Rescue PCI 427 STEMI Patients receiving lytic (60% SK, 26% RPA, 12% TPA, 2% TNK) & UFH and with <50% ST Res by 90 min 0.90 Rescue PCI 84.6% 95% Cl, 78.7-90.5 P=0.004 0.70 Repeated thrombolysis 68.7% 95% Cl, 61.1-76.4 Conservative therapy 70.1% 95% Cl, 62.5-77.7 Rescue PCI conducted 4.6 hours following fibrinolysis 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Randomization REACT. Gershlick A. et al. NEJM 2005;353:2758-2768

Meta-analysis: Rescue PCI vs Conservative Tx Outcome Rescue PCI Conservative Treatment Mortality, % (n) HF, % (n) Reinfarction, % (n) Stroke, % (n) Minor bleeding, % (n) 7.3 (454) 12.7 (424) 6.1 (346) 3.4 (297) 16.6 (313) 10.4 (457) 17.8 (427) 10.7 (354) 0.7 (295) 3.6 (307) RR (95% CI) 0.69 (0.46 1.05) 0.73 (0.54 1.00) 0.58 (0.35 0.97) 4.98 (1.10 22.48) 4.58 (2.46 8.55) P.09.05.04.04 <.001 In 3 trials, enrolling 700 patients that reported the composite end point of all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and HF, rescue PCI was associated with a significant RR reduction of 28% (RR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P=.001) Wijeysundera HC, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:422-430.

PCI Hospital Ambulance/ER STUDY PROTOCOL STEMI <3 hrs from onset symptoms, PPCI <60 min not possible, 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 leads RANDOMIZATION 1:1 by IVRS, OPEN LABEL Strategy A: pharmaco-invasive Strategy B: primary PCI <75y:full dose 75y: ½ dose TNK no lytic Aspirin Clopidogrel: LD 300 mg + 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 30 mg IV + 1 mg/kg SC Q12h ECG at 90 min: ST resolution 50% YES angio >6 to 24 hrs PCI/CABG if indicated Aspirin Clopidogrel: 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 0.75 mg/kg SC Q12h NO immediate angio + rescue PCI if indicated Antiplatelet and antithrombin treatment according to local standards Standard primary PCI Primary endpoint: composite of all cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013 Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

PCI Hospital Ambulance/ER STUDY PROTOCOL STEMI <3 hrs from onset symptoms, PPCI <60 min not possible, 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 leads RANDOMIZATION 1:1 by IVRS, OPEN LABEL Strategy A: pharmaco-invasive Strategy B: primary PCI <75y:full dose 75y: ½ dose TNK no lytic Aspirin Clopidogrel: LD 300 mg + 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 30 mg IV + 1 mg/kg SC Q12h Aspirin Clopidogrel: 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 0.75 mg/kg SC Q12h ECG at 90 min: ST resolution 50% YES NO CVC ECG core Lab immediate angio + angio Adjudication >6 to 24 hrs and site feedback rescue PCI if PCI/CABG if indicated indicated Antiplatelet and antithrombin treatment according to local standards Standard primary PCI Primary endpoint: composite of all cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013 Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

MEDIAN TIMES TO TREATMENT (min) 62 100 min 29 9 Rx TNK 36% Rescue PCI at 2.2h 64% scheduled cath at 17h Sx onset 1st Medical contact Randomize IVRS Rx PPCI 61 31 86 n=1892 1 Hour 2 Hours 178 min Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

Impact of Rescue/Urgent Angiography on Outcomes of STEMI: Insights from STREAM Robert Welsh, Frans Van de Werf, Patrick Goldstein, Anthony Gershlick, Robert Wilcox, Thierry Danays, Erich Bluhmki, Cynthia Westerhout, Paul Armstrong American Heart Association Dallas, Texas Tuesday, November 19, 2013; 4:30 F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Reflections on STEMI care Research translation into practice ASSENT 3+ (2000-2002) WEST (2003-2005) Vital Heart Response (2006 - onwards) - Established paramedic based pre-hospital fibrinolysis in Canada - Expanded pre-hospital reperfusion opportunities - Demonstrated the benefit of a systematic approach with abbreviated time to treatment and excellent clinical outcomes -A region wide systematic approach to STEMI care based on best evidence and regional expertise -Focused on earliest point of care

Vital Heart Response Contemporary Management of Acute MI Pre-hospital ambulance Pre-hospital fibrinolysis Pre-hospital triage for PCI or in-hospital fibrinolysis higher 0 Patient Risk Pre-hospital fibrinolysis Pre-hospital triage for in-hospital fibrinolysis lower Tertiary hospital Rescue PCI Transfer for Primary PCI Community hospital Adapted from Welsh et al AHJ, Jan 2003

Vital Heart Response Implementation of STEMI reperfusion resources to Central/Northern Alberta Total area 661,190 km2 Population 3.7 million Rapid diagnosis, triage and treatment

Vital Heart Response - Reperfusion Strategy Metropolitan (Metro) and Non-Metropolitan patients (Non-Metro) Shavadia et al. CJC, 2013

Vital Heart Response - In-hospital events Metropolitan (Metro) and Non-Metropolitan patients (Non-Metro) % Shavadia et al. CJC, 2013

Vital Heart Response Predictors of in-hospital events Multivariable logistic regression model 5 of the composite event of death, re-mi, cardiogenic shock and congestive heart failure Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Age (yrs) 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.001 Hypercholesterolemia 0.74 (0.60, 0.90) 0.003 Diabetes 1.75 (1.38, 2.21) < 0.001 Non-metropolitan site 0.81 (0.50, 1.30) 0.37 Fibrinolysis 0.41 (0.26, 0.67) < 0.0012 5 The overall model is significant (LR χ 2 (6) = 93.25 with p-value < 0.0001). The model fits the data well (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ 2 (6) = 1.17 with p-value = 0.979; C-statistic=0.66). Shavadia et al. CJC, 2013

Summary 1. In 2013, optimal STEMI care requires regional access to primary PCI and fibrinolysis with an individual patient risk - based reperfusion strategy 2. Following fibrinolysis the pharmacoinvasive strategy improves outcomes and should be employed within a dedicated STEMI system of care

Summary Pharmacoinvasive 3. Clinical vigilance for reperfusion success and urgent catheterization in the setting of reperfusion failure (rescue) or with early recurrent ischemia is warranted To date limited predictors exist for the need for rescue 4. Following successful fibrinolysis - scheduled early angiography (6-24 hours) should be encouraged Provides an optimal medical and interventional interplay with excellent patient outcomes and rational cost effective approach to revascularization