Evaluation of Biosecurity Status in Commercial Broiler Farms in Sri Lanka

Similar documents
Assessment of biosecurity initiatives on broiler farms in Khartoum, Sudan

VETERINARY SERVICES POLICY STATEMENT

Local Preparedness and Response for Animal Disease Emergencies

Biosecurity and preventing disease

Unit C: Poultry Management. Lesson 3: Poultry Health Management

Technical meeting 4-6 December 2013 Beijing

Avian Influenza. Poultry Growers September 2015

Salmonella Control Programs in the USA

WORLD OSTRICH ASSOCIATION UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROLING AVIAN INFLUENZA RISKS IN OSTRICH

Suggestions to prevent / control Respiratory Disease Complex in poultry

Global and Regional Strategies for HPAI and CSF

Avian Influenza. Regional Workshops: Veterinary Discussion. Will Garton

How to prevent transmission to/from domestic pigs

Knowledge of poultry diseases, biosecurity and husbandry practices among stakeholders in poultry production in Kogi State, Nigeria

Updations on the epidemiological situation of Avian Influenza (AI) in Libya. The 11 th JPC REMESA Algiers, Algeria 24-25November2015

Int. J. BioRes. 1(6): June, 2010 Uddin et al.

Biosecurity and risk factors for production diseases in broilers

Let s talk Chicken. With. Dr Anthony Chacko. (National Milling Corporation) National Trustee, Poultry Association of Zambia.

OIE Situation Report for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

Profile on TADs in Japan

Newcastle disease. in the Czech Republic

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF SERIOUS POULTRY DISEASES

Alberta Poultry Industry Emergency Management Team. Date: April 28, 2015 No. Pages (Including cover page): 5

OIE Situation Report for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

Effect of starter and finisher feed replacement time on the performance of broiler chickens. A.B Thasleem and L.S David

The costs of poultry production diseases: what do we actually know?

Avian Influenza situation in Cambodia

DRINKING WATER. Dose: 100 ppm Dose: 200 ppm (history of problems during reception)

International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN : Research Article

APEC Ministerial Meeting on Avian and Influenza Pandemics Da Nang, Viet Nam, 4-6 May 2006

AI surveillance of domestic birds in Vietnam. Under the OIE/Japan Trust Fund Project (JTF) for Strengthening HPAI Control in Asia,

Avian Influenza (AI) National & International Update

Epidemiology of Newcastle Disease. By Dr. Jonathan Amakye Anim & Dr. John Tsitsiwu

OIE Regional Workshop on Enhancing Influenza Viruses National Surveillance Systems, Tokyo, August 2014

VETERINARY EXTENSION

This paper is in two Sections (A and B) and instructions relating to the number of questions to be answered are given at the head of each Section.

Salmonella enteritidis (SE) Surveillance Program: Applications and Lessons Learned

Influenza and the Poultry Link

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC)

SWIFT ACTIONS TO SAFEGUARDING LIVELIHOODS FROM POTENTIAL INTRUSION OF H7N9 VIRUS

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza. Outbreak Prevention Protocol September 2015

Lohmann Compendium Handout. Visible health. Comprehensive solutions to prevent foot pad dermatitis. Prevention first.

OIE Situation Report for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

On Farm Hygiene & Bio-security. Dr. Stephen Graham

National Contingency Plan for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza in Nepal.

Frequently Asked Questions on Avian Influenza

Secure Egg Supply. Maintaining a Secure Egg Supply During a Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreak

Analyses of the Poultry Value Chain and Its Linkages and Interactions with HPAI Risk Factors in Nigeria

OIE Situation Report for Avian Influenza

AviagenBrief. Marek s Disease Control in Broiler Breeders

National Strategies for Controlling Avian Influenza Viruses

WELCOME TO POULTRY TECHNICAL MEET

FAO of the UN, WHO and OIE with the collaboration of UNSIC and UNICEF. Background Paper

Highly-Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) Iowa Concern Hotline Frequently Asked Questions Updated :30pm

California Custom Processing Plant Quality Assurance Plan

Anni McLeod, Nancy Morgan, Adam Prakash, Jan Hinrichs, FAO (AGAL and ESCB). FAO Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases Operations (ECTAD)

Mexico H7N3 HPAI Summary

Differential Diagnosis of Respiratory Disease in Broilers

Government structure on Food safety and Animal health system in Japan

Poultry Biosecurity PREPARING FOR FALL AI THREAT

Why Bio Security is Essential in the Ornamental Fish Industry, and How to Implement it Danny Benjamin Hazorea Aquatics Kibbutz Hazorea, Israel

High Path Avian Influenza. October 14, 2015 Reservoir Migrating Wild Waterfowl

Overview of biosecurity systems in EU Member States. Milos Juras Food and Veterinary Office Unit F6 Animal and Welfare Grange, Dunsany (MH) - Ireland

State of U.S. Egg Layer Health 2013 Annual Survey

Avian Flu Update. Dr. Sheila E. Purdum Extension Poultry Specialist Professor, Animal Science, UNL

ANALYSIS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS INFLUENCING POULTRY EGG PRODUCTION AMONG POULTRY FARMERS IN ONDO STATE, NIGERIA.

SEA/CD/154 Distribution : General. Avian Influenza in South-East Asia Region: Priority Areas for Research


Awareness and Practice of Biosecurity Measures in Small Scale Poultry Production in Ekiti State, Nigeria

INDONESIA Culling Compensation Policy and Practice

A. No. There are no current reports of avian influenza (bird flu) in birds in the U.S.

Avian Influenza Update Webinar Agenda January 22, University of Georgia Poultry Science Department

HPAI virus evolution and vaccination in Indonesia

Risk Management of Importation of Day Old Chicks in Khartoum State, Sudan

Copyright Cobb-Vantress, Inc.

Indiana State Board of Animal Health

Mycoplasma driving you crazy?

Surviving an HPAI Outbreak

Economic Impacts of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) Outbreak in Vietnam Pig Production

8. are organic compounds that include sugars, starches, celluloses and gums. a. Carbohydrates b. Fats and oils c. Minerals d. Vitamins e.

Goals. Transboundary or. We are Here to Help. Awareness that animal biosecurity is addressed at the. Who s who during an outbreak

Indiana State Board of Animal Health

Avian Influenza Surveillance in Thailand 16 December 2010, Kasetsart University - Bangkhen

1. Avian Influenza H5N1 had not occurred in Malaysia until the first case of

Salt Intoxication in Commercial Broilers and Breeders a Clinical and Pathological Description

Practical Biosecurity for Pig Farmers, Smallholders and Pet Pig Keepers in Scotland

INFO SHEET. E. coli Versus. Environmental Management: Which Has Evolved Faster?

AVIAN INFLUENZA (AI)

Moving beyond AI Case study from The Netherlands

Enhancing animal health security and food safety in organic livestock production

Home News Chickens Turkeys Processing Other Poultry Regions Even

Ceva HAND book of poultry diseases

DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY, A FINNISH EXAMPLE

What we need to know about Bird Flu

PROJECT DOCUMENT. Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao People s Democratic Republic (PDR), People s Republic of China and Viet Nam

Avian Influenza Outbreaks. in the USA (12/2014 5/2015)

IMPORT HEALTH STANDARD FOR THE IMPORTATION OF TURKEY HATCHING EGGS INTO NEW ZEALAND FROM AUSTRALIA, CANADA AND NORTHERN IRELAND

Emerging global health threats of animal origin

Secure Turkey Supply Plan - Issuing Movement Permits During an Outbreak of HPAI

Transcription:

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 217 114 ISSN 225-3153 Evaluation of Biosecurity Status in Commercial Broiler Farms in Sri Lanka W.M.J.B. Wijesinghe *, P.G.J.C. De Silva *, S.P. Gunaratne ** * Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. ** Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Abstract- Biosecurity is the practice designed to prevent the spread of diseases onto farm, with in farm and out from the farm. It has three major components, isolation, traffic control and sanitation. Good biosecurity should be practiced at all the time and it is the cheapest and the most effective means of disease control. Therefore, objectives of this study were to evaluate and grade the commercial broiler farms according to the present biosecurity status and to correlate the performances with biosecurity status of those farms. A questionnaire covering all basic conceptual, structural and operational aspects of biosecurity was used to collect data from 8 commercial broiler farms in Central Province of Sri Lanka. Minitab software was used to analyze the data. There is a significant negative correlation (p<.5) between average catching age with overall biosecurity status. The average body weight has shown positive correlation while average mortality% and FCR having negative correlation though not statistically significant (p<.5). The biosecurity status of most farms falls to category of Average representing about 56%, while Good and Poor had about 15% and 27% of farms, respectively. There were very few broiler farms found in categories of Excellent and Very poor in terms of overall biosecurity status. Index Terms- Biosecurity, commercial broiler farms W I. INTRODUCTION ith the development of modern poultry rearing methods, backyard poultry farming is less prominent in the modern world. Most of the technologies and developments direct the industry toward the intensive management system where huge numbers of birds are confined to limited space with improved environmental facilities. Main disadvantage of this system observed in recent past is that when an outbreak crop up infection spreading rate is more rapid causing significant economic losses. Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) is a good example for such a huge loss (Rushton et al., 25; FAO, 214). Once birds get infected, control measures and treatments to prevent further spreading the infection and mortality is more often failed. Therefore, prevention of infectious diseases has become a priority. Thus, strict sanitation, quarantine and biosecurity within the farms, country and between the borders become an important issue today. Biosecurity is the practice designed to prevent the spread of diseases onto farm, with in farm and out from the farm (Jeffrey, 1997). It is achieved via maintaining minimum entry of organisms such as bacteria, viruses, rodents etc. cross the farms. It has three major components, isolation, traffic control and sanitation (Jeffrey, 1997). In order to have an effective disease prevention programme, good biosecurity should be a priority and should be practiced at all times. Taking the right measures will help to protect not only birds, but also poultry industry, business as well as community. In Sri Lanka, poultry industry is the fastest growing and the most developed livestock sub sector (Central bank 214). There are three grandparent farms and nearly 33 registered breeder farms operating in Sri Lanka. Moreover, there are more than 15 chicken meat processors in the country. Most of these large scale companies maintain environmental controlled broiler houses for the purpose of efficient broiler meat production and thereby to meet high chicken meat demand. Management practices in these controlled houses are highly advanced and high importance has been given on effective health management through strong biosecurity programme. However, the majority of the commercial broiler farms in Sri Lanka are side walls open houses and small scale in nature. Often farmers have poor knowledge on diseases and their spreading, biosecurity and overall farm management. It has been estimated that disease cost for commercial broiler industry is about 1% of the total cost of production (Waller, 27). These losses can be attributing to direct mortality and indirectly from downgrading, poor performances, cost for medicine and condemnation. Moreover, there is an overuse of antibiotic and other supplements since most of the poultry medicines available in the country can be purchase over the counter. As a consequence, development of antimicrobial resistance and deterioration of the quality of the end product has been observed. For example, antibiotic residue is becoming a critical factor in meat quality certification system. It is a question very often asked, whether commercial broiler farms in our country having basic and practicable biosecurity measures to overcome important health problems. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the basic biosecurity status of commercial broiler farms in the country and to rank them according to the available biosecurity measures. Therefore, a survey was conducted to evaluate the biosecurity status in commercial broiler farms in Sri Lanka.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 217 115 ISSN 225-3153 II. METHODOLOGY A questionnaire was designed to cover aspects of conceptual, structural and operational biosecurity. Conceptual biosecurity consists of information on awareness on biosecurity, hygiene, record keeping and overall farm management whereas structural biosecurity consists of questions on location of the farm, housing system and arrangement within the houses. Under operational biosecurity, information on bird rearing, feeding and watering, storage, transportation, disposal, cleaning, disinfection and treatments, were gathered. Data were collected from randomly selected 8 medium scale broiler farms in Central Province of the Sri Lanka. Total of 12 marks were allocated to the questions in questionnaire according to the strength and important of biosecurity and then the farms were graded as follow. Marks greater than 8% was ranked as Excellent, 7-8% as Good, 6-7% as Average, 45-6% as Poor and below 45% as Very poor. MINITAB statistical software was used to analyze the data. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The total of 8 farms were categorized according to the strength and important of biosecurity and then the farms were graded as Excellent, Good, Average, Poor and Very poor. The percentage of farms in each category is given in figure 1. According to the results 56% of farms belong to the category of Average and 15% and 27% came under Good and Poor groups, respectively. One farm is in Excellent category and none of the farms were in Very poor category. This indicates that most of the farms having average basic biosecurity status and few farms available with perfect conditions in terms of biosecurity. 6 56.25 5 % of farms 3 2 15 27.5 1 1.25 Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor Figure 1: Percentage of farms categorized according to overall biosecurity status Biosecurity status of broiler farms directly affects the performances of birds. The performances of broiler birds in different farm categories based on overall biosecurity status are given in table 1. When the biosecurity status is improved in the farm, disease challenge will be reduced and the environment become more favorable for birds performance. Table 1: Comparison of broiler performances with different category of farms Farm Category Average catching age (days) Average final body weight (kg) Average FCR Average mortality % Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Excellent 39-2.5-1.8-2.5 - Good 39.11-41.55 2. 1.83-2.16 1.83 1.67-1.83 3.7 3.3-4.19 Average 41 39.89-41.29 1.95 1.93-2. 1.83 1.75-1.84 3.7 2.99-4.28 Poor 42 41.7-42.86 1.9 1.81-1.98 1.85 1.8-1.88 4.2 3.-4.7 Very Poor - - - - - - - - 95% CI- 95% Confident Intervals

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 217 116 ISSN 225-3153 There is 1 g final body weight difference between excellent and average levels of farms. However, the FCR remain more or less same. This concludes that the feed cost to produce 1 kg live weight is less in excellent farms as the environment more conducive to exploit the optimum genetic potential of broiler birds with minimal disturbances from pathogens. Moreover, average total mortality is less in excellent category (2.5%) compared with category good (3.7%). Therefore, good biosecurity reduce the economic loss for drugs and other medications bringing down the cost of production. Furthermore, catching period is shortened by two days in excellent category compared to good category. This is important to have more batches per year which ultimately increases the production per year. This is important to increase down time and more cycles of batches with in the year. Good, Average and Poor farms performances are in-between 95% confident intervals value and they are significant with z test. Regression analysis was performed for total biosecurity score with average final body weight, average catching age, average mortality% and FCR. Average catching age had significant negative correlation (p<.5) with final biosecurity score. Though statistically not significant, average final body weight had positive correlation while average mortality% and FCR had negative correlation. That means when total biosecurity score increases average body weight increases while total mortality %, FCR and final catching age decreases. A. Conceptual biosecurity When considering the conceptual biosecurity aspects among broiler farms, record keeping and technical consultation are good while other areas such as awareness of important of biosecurity, diseases and their transmission, farm management and farm hygiene are remain as average (Table 2). Table 2: Percentages of conceptual biosecurity status among broiler farms Good % Average % Poor % Awareness of important of biosecurity 15. 72.5 12.5 Awareness of diseases & transmission 7.5 71.25 21.25 Hygiene of farm 7.5 76.25 16.25 Record keeping 43.75 36.25 2. Overall farm management 15. 76.25 8.75 Technical consultation/ services 45. 43.75 11.25 Participation of private sector is high and competitive in poultry industry in Sri Lanka. Therefore, they provide extension services for their customers free of charge. This service had helped to improve the conceptual biosecurity among the poultry farms. Other possible reason could be the farmers are profit oriented and therefore they are also concerned about the biosecurity. B. Operational biosecurity Operational biosecurity is the real day to day management or practices done in the farms. It includes many activities and concepts. Figure 2 illustrates the evaluated aspects of operational biosecurity in this study. % farms 1 9 88.25 81.25 8 75 72.5 7 6 5 3 26.25 2 8.75 1 13.75 1 1.25 Only broiler Broiler & Layer Poultry & other All in all out Singal age Multy age Down time>14d Figure 2: Different operational biosecurity measures among broiler farms. Down time 7-14d Down time <7d

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 217 117 ISSN 225-3153 Majority of the farms under this survey reared only broiler birds and there were few farms who reared layer birds and other livestock. All in all out system with single age flocks was the common practice. Awareness about cross contamination of germs and limitation of physical and economical recourses of the farmer may have influenced to stick to this system. Down period in most farms were more than 14 days. Contaminated water is capable to carry infectious agents and transmit the diseases within and among the poultry flocks. Therefore, source of water and methods of water treatment quite important when concern in biosecurity. Figure 3 elaborates the different type of water sources and water treatment methods. Tap water was used in most of the farms as the water source and chlorination is the main water treatment method that practiced by farmers. About 55% practice water treatment while 44% are not using any water treatment method. Chlorination is more common due to low cost and effectiveness. 9 8 78.75 7 6 55 % of farms 5 43.75 3 2 21.25 1 1.25 Tap Well Acidification Chlorination Non Source of water Method of water treatment Figure 3: Percentage of farms which used different type of water sources and water treatment methods. Carcasses and litter disposal is more important in prevention and control of diseases in poultry farms because these are the sources which are rich in infectious agents. Figure 4 shows the different methods of death bird and litter disposal methods among broiler farms. 1 9 87.5 % farms 8 7 6 5 3 2 26.25 45 28.75 1 7.5 5 In septic pit Burring Throwing Out from farm Burn in farm Heap in farm Death bird disposal Litter disposal Figure 4: Comparison of different methods of death bird and litter disposal in broiler farms.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 217 118 ISSN 225-3153 As far as the disposal of carcasses are concerned, majority of the farmers are practicing burring the carcasses (45%), and 26% used septic pit for disposal while 29% got no proper disposal system. These farmers throw the dead birds in the farm carelessly without realizing any risk. Majority of farmers dispose used litter by taking out from the farm. Farmers are aware of dead birds and litter materials as sources of carrying diseases. In addition, farmers are making extra profit by selling litter material directly or after composting. About 9% of farmers are vaccinating their flock against most common prevailing poultry diseases such as Infectious bursal disease (Gamboro) and Newcastle disease. Figure 5 shows the status of vaccination among the broiler farms. Farmers are well aware on the consequences of economical loss of inadequate vaccination based on their own experience. Hence, vaccination against common poultry diseases is common among the farms investigated. Figure 5: Use of vaccination for common diseases in broiler farms However, irrespective of the biosecurity status in farms, diseases out brake were recorded in all most all categories of farms. Colibacilosis, Salmonellosis, Chronic respiratory diseases (CRD), Coccidiosis and infectious bursal disease are the most common diseases in the broiler farms. Some of the chick born diseases and easy access to visitors increases the mechanical transmission and incidence. Figure 6 express the disease status recorded among the broiler farms. 45 35 38.75 % 3 25 2 15 23.75 16.25 27.5 1 5 E.coli CRD Salmonellosis Coccidiosis Gamboro Figure 6: Common diseases recorded in broiler farms. 1.25 1.25 NCD IB Other 6.25

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 217 119 ISSN 225-3153 E.coli infections show highest distribution among selected poultry farmers while coccidosis, Gumboro, CRD also shows moderately higher distribution. New castle disease, Infectious bronchitis and other diseases such metabolic disorders are less common in these selected farmers. IV. CONCLUSION In conclusion this survey shows that majority of commercial broiler farms belong to the category of Average in biosecurity status. The body weight, mortality%, FCR and final catching age differs with different category of biosecurity status. Biosecurity status significantly influenced catching age of the birds. Whatever the biosecurity status, incidences of diseases are high among all the farms. Disease incidences are high irrespective of the status of biosecurity of the farm. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Authors would like to thank all farmers who supported during the data collection. REFERENCES [1] Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Annual Report 214. Central Bank, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 214. [2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Food and Nutrition in Numbers 214, Rome. 214. [3] J. S. Jeffrey, Biosecurity for poultry flocks. Extension Poultry Veterinarian, University of California-Davis, 1997. [4] J. Rushton, R. Viscarra, E. G. Bleich and A. McLeod. Impact of avian influenza outbreaks in the poultry sectors of five South East Asian countries (Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Thailand, Viet Nam) outbreak costs, responses and potential long term control. World's Poultry Science Journal. 25, 61(3), 491-514. [5] A. Waller. Take a fresh look at broiler nutrition. Poultry International, September, 27, 12-13. AUTHORS W.M.J.B. Wijesinghe Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, wijesinghe214@gmail.com. P.G.J.C. De Silva Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, chandimal19@gmail.com. S.P. Gunaratne Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, spg@pdn.ac.lk. Correspondence Author W.M.J.B. Wijesinghe Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, wijesinghe214@gmail.com.