BEST PAPERS OFF 2016 for Renal cancer & Bladder cancer

Similar documents
Early radical cystectomy in NMIBC Marko Babjuk

Management of Locally Reccurent Renal Cell Carcinoma. Jose A. Karam, MD, FACS Assistant Professor Department of Urology

Bladder Sparing Treatment of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

GUIDELINES ON NON-MUSCLE- INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER

Alicia K. Morgans, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Hematology/Oncology Vanderbilt University Medical Center January 24, 2015

Reviewing Immunotherapy for Bladder Carcinoma In Situ

Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer in the Elderly and Frail Pa9ent

Role and extension of lymph node dissection in kidney, bladder and prostate cancer. Omar Ghanem (PGY3 ) Moderator: Dr A. Noujem 30 th March 2017

Intravesical Therapy for Bladder Cancer

NMIBC. Piotr Jarzemski. Department of Urology Jan Biziel University Hospital Bydgoszcz, Poland

Controversies in the management of Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

When to Integrate Surgery for Metatstatic Urothelial Cancers

The Rationale for Immunotherapy as an Adjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced BC

Chemotherapy and Bladder Cancer. Blayne Welk UBC Urology Grand Rounds June 4, 2008

Should the primary be treated in patients with metastatic disease? Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

Current Findings on High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Thomas J Polascik, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery

UROTHELIAL CELL CANCER

Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder Histopathology

Lymphadenectomy in RCC: Yes, No, Clinical Trial?

ROBOTIC VS OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY

Arieh L. Shalhav Is There a Risk in Robotic Nephroureterectomy?

Management of High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Seth P. Lerner, MD, FACS

Oral Communications & Posters

Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Primary and Recurrent TCC 4/10/2010. Two major consequences: Strategies: High-Risk NMI TCC

WHAT IS THE ROLE OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

Bladder Cancer Guidelines

Ode to a node Lymph node dissec3on in prostate and bladder cancer

Collection of Recorded Radiotherapy Seminars

5/26/16: CT scan of the abdomen showed a multinodular liver disease highly suspicious for metastasis and hydronephrosis of the right kidney.

Guidelines for the Management of Bladder Cancer West Midlands Expert Advisory Group for Urological Cancer

The Depth of Tumor Invasion is Superior to 8 th AJCC/UICC Staging System to Predict Patients Outcome in Radical Cystectomy.

Research Article Partial Cystectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Contemporary Experience

T1HG Bladder Cancer What is the Best Therapy?

Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Optimal sequencing in treatment muscle invasive bladder cancer : oncologists. Phichai Chansriwong, MD Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

A patient with recurrent bladder cancer presents with the following history:

Disclosures. The Importance of Pathology? Pathologic, Morphologic and Clinical Features. Pathologic Reproducibility

MUSCLE-INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER


Issues in the Management of High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer

MUSCLE - INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Ureteroscopy Is Indicated in every patient with suspected Upper Tract Urothelial Tumor

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer: fighting between evidence 1 level and real life.

Urinary Bladder: WHO Classification and AJCC Staging Update 2017

CHEMO-RADIOTHERAPY FOR BLADDER CANCER. Dr Darren Mitchell Consultant Clinical Oncologist Northern Ireland Cancer Centre

Urinary Bladder Cancer

Staging and Grading Last Updated Friday, 14 November 2008

Critical Evaluation of Early Post-operative Single Instillation Therapy in NMIBC

Contemporary management of high-grade T1 bladder cancer Arnulf Stenzl

Original Article APMC-276

Q&A. Fabulous Prizes. Collecting Cancer Data: Bladder, Renal Pelvis, and Ureter 5/2/13. NAACCR Webinar Series

Paul F. Schellhammer, M.D. Eastern Virginia Medical School Urology of Virginia Norfolk, Virginia

BLADDER CANCER: PATIENT INFORMATION

Radical Cystectomy Often Too Late? Yes, But...

Old and New Radiation for Bladder and Upper Tract Cancers. Bridget Koontz Radiation Oncology Duke Cancer Institute

Post-Mastectomy RT after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC)

Implications of ACOSOG Z11 for Clinical Practice: Surgical Perspective

Bladder Case 1 SURGICAL PATHOLOGY REPORT. Procedure: Cystoscopy, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT)

Complex case Presentations

Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter Histopathology

Management options for high-risk, BCG-refractory NMIBC. Alan M. Nieder, M.D. Columbia University Division of Urology Mount Sinai Medical Center

Surgeons Perspective: LN as a Draining Pattern. Jose A. Karam, MD, FACS Associate Professor Department of Urology

Case 1. Receives induction BCG weekly x 6 without significant toxicity Next step should be:

Does the Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers Improve Survival in Bladder Cancer?

3.1 Investigations for Patients Presenting with Haematuria Table 1

Clinical significance of immediate urine cytology after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer


Renal Mass Biopsy: Needed Now More than Ever

Options for first-line cisplatin-eligible patients

Indications For Partial

Canadian Urological Association guidelines for followup of patients after treatment of nonmetastatic

Lymph node dissection: how much is enough?

Trimodality Therapy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

BLADDER CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY

Quiz. b. 4 High grade c. 9 Unknown

Why Do Axillary Dissection? Nodal Treatment and Survival NSABP B04. Revisiting Axillary Dissection for SN Positive Patients

A215- Urinary bladder cancer tissues

Vincenzo Ficarra. Direttore Clinica di Urologia Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Udine

Implications of ACOSOG Z11 for Clinical Practice: Surgical Perspective

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Distant Metastasis Following Loco-Regional Recurrence of breast cancer. Cheol Min Kang 2018/04/05

Surgery of Renal Cell Carcinoma Axel Bex, MD, PhD The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients with pathological Stage T3b and/or lymph node metastatic bladder cancer after radical cystectomy

Risk Adapted Treatment of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eila C. Skinner, MD

When PSA fails. Urology Grand Rounds Alexandra Perks. Rising PSA after Radical Prostatectomy

Some Seminal Studies. Chemotherapy Alone is Inadequate. Bladder Cancer Role of Radiation in Bladder Sparing. Primary Radiation for Bladder Cancer

Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer BCG Failures: University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Experience. Paul Gellhaus Assistant Clinical Professor

Debate: Adjuvant vs. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Urothelial Cancer

September 10, Dear Dr. Clark,

Bladder Cancer in Primary Care. Dr Penny Kehagioglou Consultant Clinical Oncologist

Pathologic Assessment of Invasion in TUR Specimens. A. Lopez-Beltran. T1 (ct1)

Renal biopsy is mandatory for every small renal mass

Debate: Whole pelvic RT for high risk prostate cancer??

Urothelial Tumors of the Upper Tract: Diagnosis and Management. Daniel Rapoport April 11, 2007 Urology Grand Rounds

Intravesical Gemcitabine for High Risk, Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer after Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Treatment Failure

models; Kaplan meier curves were also extrapolated for each cohort to compare disease specific and overall survival patterns.

ICUD 2011 Recommendations. Bladder Cancer

Debate: Lymphadenectomy is Important in mrcc, CON P. Mulder, M.D., Ph.D. JJ. Patard, MD, Ph.D.

ACCME/Disclosures. Case History 4/13/2016. USCAP GU Specialty Conference Case 3. Ann Arbor, MI

Transcription:

BEST PAPERS OFF 2016 for Renal cancer & Bladder cancer ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ ΒΑΡΚΑΡΑΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΛΗΡΩΤΗΣ ΚΑΘΗΓΗΤΗΣ ΟΥΡΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ ΕΘΝΙΚΟ & ΚΑΠΟΔΙΣΤΡΙΑΚΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΑΘΗΝΩΝ ΣΙΣΜΑΝΟΓΛΕΙΟ ΝΟΣΟΚΟΜΕΙΟ

ΔΕΝ ΕΧΩ ΣΥΓΚΡΟΥΣΗ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝΤΩΝ

EAU guidelines recommend treatment in: large tumors women of child-bearing age follow-up or access to emergency care is inadequate A size threshold for treatment remains controversial, with previous recommendazons suggeszng 3 4 cm. The 4 cm threshold is based on a study by Oesterling et al based on 13 pt The true natural history may remain unknown because symptoma?c cases are more likely to be idenzfied and included in case series.

MATERIALS & METHODS Radiology record crawler system (Montage; Montage Healthcare Systems, Philadelphia, USA) 2741 pazents with renal AML. 447 pazents with 582 tumors with >3 abdominal imaging. FU: median 43 mo (range: 14 144 mo)

RESULTS (10%) Tumors>4cm more likely Younger age TSC SymptomaZc intervenzon No difference in the average growth rate of lesions <4cm vs >4cm 91% did not grow or grew slowly (0.02cm/y) 9% grew with rate >0.25cm/y 93% were eleczve intervenzons 25/447(5.6%) had interven?on More frequently young age TSC SymptomaZc >4cm

RESULTS SYMPTOMS In 10% overall In 30% if AML>4cm Most common hematuria & pain Non TSC Pain > hematuria TSC Hematuria > Pain (p=0.16) Retroperitoneal bleeding Rare 0.4% Majority do not have prior Sx Can happen with RCC as well with same frequency Interven?on 5% SAE, RFA, mtor inhibitors, PNx

TAKE HOME MESSAGE Most sporadic AMLs are ASx do not grow or grow slowly regardless of inizal size. Pt with ASx or mildly Sx AMLs even if >4cm should be offered inizal AS Pt should be aware of small risk of progression especially in fast growing AMLs (>0.25cm/y)

Uniform temperatures >60C required my not be reached (heat sink) RFA outcomes associated with Tumor size Increased failure rates Clear cell histology Degree of tumor enhancement (change HU from non-contrast to contrast enhanced arterial phase ) FAILURE?

MATERIALS & METHODS RESULTS ``` ` Sample? 158 pazents RFA ablazon Biopsy confirmed RCC in 81% 7% incomplete abla?on 93% (99 pt) RCC successful abla?on

RESULTS 5-year DFS P<0.01 <3cm 100% >3cm 69.2% P=0.24 <60HU 100% >60HU 92.4% P=0.27 Non-clear cell 100% Clear cell 92.5% Disease recurrence 5.4% (5 pt) Median follow up 30 mo

STUDY LIMITATIONS Retrospec?ve study. Limited number of pt. Standard protocol for contrast use in CT was used some varia?on is expected: Degree of enhancement within the tumor depends on 0ming amount of contrast used Part of tumor measured tumors are heterogeneous and degree of enhancement can vary.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE Tumors with contrast enhancement >60HU have higher incomplete abla?on a er RFA Contrast enhancement cannot predict DFS Tumor size >3cm remains a significant risk factor for DFS

Heterogeneous behavior of RCC lesions Low grade & stage indolent course High grade & stage risk of growth and systemic spread Residual tumor in the context of PSM mimics the primary lesion Lack of consensus for clinical relevance of a PSM acer PNx Variability in pathological characteriszcs in various studies Contemporary studies lack the sta?s?cal power High risk pazents with and without PSM PSM in high and low risk pazents

A retrospec?ve mul?-ins?tu?onal review 1240 pt PNx (O/L/R) Median FU 33mo +sm 7.8% (97) 2/3 in Low risk pt (71%) 1/3 in High risk pt (29%) Recurrence 5.6% (69) Median Zme 19mo MATERIALS & METHODS PSM was unrelated to tumor size, stage, grade, histology, focality (all p > 0.05).

univariable -sm RESULTS +sm 61% 39% A +margin was associated with an increased risk of relapse on mulzvariable analysis (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.09e 3.97, p. 0.03) but not with site of recurrence. increased risk of local as well as metasta?c relapse.

RESULTS Subgroups in which PSM was a predictor of recurrence Median Zme to recurrence was 19 months for high risk cases.

RESULTS 45% in 5 years a posi?ve surgical margin was significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence in cases considered high risk (p < 0.001) but not low risk (p. 0.647).

STUDY LIMITATIONS Retrospec?ve nature Heterogeneity Surgical technique Pt seleczon Follow up Incomplete informa?on Nephrometry score Intraopera?ve biopsy Management of intraopera?ve biopsy Depth and magnitude of PSM Not powered for analysis of recurrence loca?on

TAKE HOME MESSAGE PSM associated with local and metasta?c tumor recurrence a er PN This relazonship observed specifically for tumors with high risk features RFS was similar among low risk features regardless of margin status In complex ct2 maybe RNx beger?

Most common site of metastasis in pt with RCC is the lung (45-75%) Indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN): 1mm-2cm round pulmonary opacity that may be benign or malignant Determine predictors of progression of an IPN to pulmonary metastasis in pt with localized or locally advanced RCC treated with nephrectomy.

MATERIALS & METHODS 251 pt with IPM in prop CT FU at least 3years (Q3-6mt CT or CXR) IPM <2cm Considered Pulmonary M when Increase of size Increase of number Histological diagnosis RESULTS IPN developed in M+ 29% (FU 35.3mo) IPN not develop in M+ 71% (FU 38mo)

RESULTS T N G LVI Sarc IVC pt3a

RESULTS

RESULTS LMFS @ 3y 71% @5y 65%

RESULTS DSS @3y 86% @5y 79%

Nomogram for LMFS Calibra?on plot of the predicted probability of LMFS @ 3y vs actual % of pt who survived 3y without LM

STUDY LIMITATIONS RetrospecZve study Single insztuzon SelecZon bias NOT standard preoperazve and postoperazve imaging strategy Heterogeneous treatment strategy a er diagnosis of pulmonary M may change DSS

TAKE HOME MESSAGE IPN have a higher probability of becoming M+ in pt with high T stage high N stage high Grade thrombi Presence of fat invasion Presence of LVI Presence of more and larger nodules in preop CT Although this knowledge will not change clinical management Beger risk stra?fica?on will change FU?ming and influence adjuvant TX strategies.

Tumor in the IMPDU is unusual (finding of tumor in UO during TURBT) Complete TURBT (wide resec?on of the UO) PotenZally higher risk of Ureteral scarring/stricture UTUC recurrence (reflux?) Predic?ve factors for development of Ureteral scarring/stricture UTUC recurrence (reflux?)

MATERIALS & METHODS RetrospecZve analysis: 2,317 TURBT pt 112 pt with tumors of the IMPDU Complete TURBT with wide resec?on of UO Double-J catheter for 15d: extensive resec?on of the trigone macroscopic tumor remaining in the distal ureter All cases BCG FU U/S 1 mo a er. If hydro noted CTU CTU @ 3 mt and Q6mt Stricture if intervenzon needed

RESULTS 4.83% (112pt) reseczon of UO Ta in 64% of cases T1 in 27.7% CIS in 17% 31% Double-J catheter (36 pt) Double J did not influence ureteral stenosis recurrent UTUC Distal ureteral stenosis in 11.6% at a median of 47 days UTUC developed in 15.2% (22mt FU) Distal ureter in 65.4% Invasive or high grade 59%-NUx

RESULTS Recurrent Tumor associa?on with Ureteral Stenosis and UTUC 42% were recurrent SS differences between primary and recurrent tumors with respect to the incidence of: ü symptoms at diagnosis (60% vs 26%, p <0.001), ü development of ureteral stenosis (4.6% vs 21.3%, p. 0.007) ü incidence of UTUC (4.6% vs 29.8%, p <0.001). Treatment of 13 pazents with ureteral stenosis: de-obstruczve TURBT in 6 (46%), ureteral reimplanta?on in 5 (38%) balloon dilazon in 2 (15%)

RESULTS UO stenosis UTUC univariate mulzvariate univariate mulzvariate Recurrent tumors 0.013 0.025 0.001 0.003 Tumor Size>1.5cm 0.001 0.023 0.017 T1 bladder & IMDU 0.002 0.005 0.001 0.001 Cis IMDU 0.006 0.001 0.006

STUDY LIMITATIONS Retrospec?ve study Small number of pt with stenosis & UTUC recurrence Stent placement only when extended resec?on selec7on bias Not able to evaluate vesicoureteral reflux and therefore not possible to associate recurrent UTUC with reflux or primary mulzfocal disease

Tumor at the UO occurs with at 4.8% of TURBTs A er complete Resec?on of the UO a er a mean FU 56mo: Stenosis occurred at 11.6% UTUC occurred 15.2% On mul?variate analysis Tumor size >1.5cm and T1 stage were factors for stenosis T1 in the bladder and CIS in the IMPDU were factors for UTUC recurrence Double J stent did not influence the occurrence or not of stenosis TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Immediate RC is considered the gold standard a er BCG failure Salvage IVT in pazents who want to maintain their bladder Early RC a er BCG fails vs. delayed RC a er salvage IVT fails

MATERIALS & METHODS GROUP 1: Early RCx acer BCG failure GROUP 2: Late RCx acer salvage IVT T1 61 pt 56 pt cis Path report of last TURB before RCB

RESULTS Median?me from diagnosis prompzng for BCG to RCx 0.81years in group A 2.51 years in group B 1.7y retained their bladder more in group B Group B Underes?mated 37 pt NOT included Did not require RCx acer salvage IVT (for 5.7years)

RESULTS Predictors of upstaging LVI most strongly predicted muscle invasion 8 /10 pt with at least 1 TUR specimen with LVI progressed to pt2 or greater at RC

RESULTS OS 5y 80% CSS 5y 85% Median FU acer RCx Group A 4.68y Group B 5.14y A er RC bladder cancer recurred in 32 pazents, 15 in group 1 17 in group 2.

RESULTS Significant predictors of death

TAKE HOME MESSAGE Pa?ents that select to defer RCx and do further IVT a er they fail BCG, have similar OS and CSS while keeping their bladder for longer. Risk factors of poor prognosis in this popula?on include repezzve instances of ct1 and CIS, upstaging to ct1 prosta?c urethra involvement. LVI on any TUR specimen (very poor prognoszcator) (8/10 pt had MIBC at RC & 7/10 died of BC) 2 or more of these risk factors should prompt serious considerazon of abandoning further IVT in favor of RC..

Delay of RCx >12 weeks from diagnosis is associated with inferior survival (higher pt3-4, pn+) Determine the effect on survival of the?ming of radical cystectomy from the diagnosis of MIBC in pazents who received NAC

MATERIALS & METHODS CX + NAC 1996-2014 JHH database Pa?ent Popula?on PaZent charts for 1) pretreatment characteris?cs (demographics, clinical stage, histology and previous IVT) 2) intervals between diagnosis of MIBC and the inizazon of NAC and RCx; 3) Post-treatment and treatment clinical and pathological characteriszcs. Study End Points Complete pathological response a er NAC (no tumor) Par?al pathological response a er NAC (no MIBC) Pathological response rate (%of pazents with CR & PR) Overall survival

RESULTS 201 pt NAC + RCx @Dx extravesical Dx (35%) T3 28% T4 7% LND 9% 29% had variant histologies (squamous/ adenomatous/ micropapillary /sarcomatoid)

RESULTS At cystectomy 22% complete pathological response (T0) 29% par?al pathological response (Tis/T1) 51% pathological response rate Median OS 43.2 mo Be er OS age < 62 years (p. 0.034) pure urothelial histology (p. 0.001) Worse OS < 3 cycles NAC extravesical /N+ disease (p. 0.001).

Dx 6wk NAC RESULTS 28wk 22wk 4GC-12wk 10wk RCx Associa?on of OS and Treatment Intervals P=0.36 P=0.8 P=0.38 None of the treatment intervals was significantly associated with OS

STUDY LIMITATIONS RetrospecZve Inherent selec?on bias (Young/caucasian pt) Small sample GC predominantly used in this study (safety profile) Short FU Pt treated with NAC who had progression or toxicity were not captured in this database

TAKE HOME MESSAGES There was a 51% pathological response rate (22% CR, 29% PR) NO associa?on between OS and?me between MIBC diagnosis and cystectomy in pazents with MIBC receiving NAC. Less than 3 cycles of NAC and extravesical and or pn+ Dx is associated with worse OS. However delays in treatment should not be legi?mized based on this study. In pa?ents not receiving NAC, prompt surgical intervenzon remains the standard of care.

166 T1 HG randomised Low dose 40mg 8wk Standard dose 80mg Complete response rates low dose 79% standard dose 85% Low dose less fever (p = 0.001) micturi?on pain (p = 0.047) higher quality of life scores. No differences recurrence, Progression Overall survival

Comparing the short-term outcomes and complica?ons of monopolar and bipolar transurethral resec?on of non-muscle invasive bladder cancers: a prospec?ve, randomized, controlled study. Bolat D 1, Gunlusoy B 1, Degirmenci T 1, Ceylan Y 1, Polat S 1, Aydin E 1, Aydogdu O 1, Kozacioglu Z 1. Bipolar TURBT had significantly lower obturator jerk and bladder perfora?on than monopolar. B- TURBT is a reasonable treatment modality in pazents with NMIBC.

Ευχαριστώ

5% improvement in OS with NAC included only 4% with cn1-3 disease. Thus, NAC results may not necessarily extend to cn1-3. Clinical outcomes in pt with BCa & cn1-3 treated with induc?on chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy are limited. In this study we assess pathological and survival outcomes

PATIENTS & METHODS Mul?-ins?tu?onal retrospeczve analysis (19 centers) PaZents with ct1-4an1-n3 urothelial carcinoma who received NAC followed by RCB. Lymph node status based on imaging criteria Chemotherapy regimens: MVAC GC other (not cisplazn) End points pathological response rates complete (pt0n0) par?al (pt1n0 or less) overall survival. factors prediczng outcomes

Number of pa?ents 304/1618 (19%) had cn1-3 248/304 (82%) had pn0-3 RESULTS Chemo regimens GC 43% MVAC 42% Other 15% (median 4 cycles) Pathological Complete and Par?al Response pcr (pt0n0) 14.5% ppr (pt1n0 or less) 27% (pcr was only seen in pa7ents with cn1-n2). On mulzvariable analysis none of the selected variables were independent predictors of pcr or ppr pcr & ppr was similar with all chemo regimens

RESULTS Pathological Nodal Response. pcnr (pn0) 48% 56% of cn1 39% of cn2 39% of cn3 (p.0.03) OS improved in cn2-3 cases that became pn0 vs those remained pn+. Of pt0 bladder status pa7ents 38% were found to have posi7ve lymph nodes (pt0n+)

RESULTS P<0.001 13mo 107mo 45mo 14mo Median OS for the enzre cohort was 23 mo 55% local recurrence or M+ disease (151 pt) Overall 50% pt died during FU (median of 10 mo) 88% of them died of bladder cancer 28% with pt0 23% with pn0 18% with pcr

RESULTS OS longer for cn1 vs cn2-3 but NSS (p=0.23) Remained NSS a er controlling for age, gender, T stage (p=0.11) At the cutoff point of 15 lymph nodes removed OS was p=0.01 OS associated with pcr of nodes (pn0) Number of nodes removed (-)sm Cispla?n Tx (MVAC vs GC same)

RESULTS Pa?ents with Unknown Pathological Nodal status Median survival similar to the pn+ cohort worse than the pn0

RetrospecZve study No standardizazon of chemotherapy (dose, data on toxicity, morbidity and mortality) SelecZon bias in the choice of chemotherapy regimens. Some Pt with cn1-3 not proceed to RC (seleczon bias-favorable subset of cn1-3pt) Not centralized radiological and pathological review Not always biopsy confirmazon of nodal involvement Risk factors not included performance status medical comorbidizes, Hydronephrosis Cardiovascular status Renal funczon STUDY LIMITATIONS

Induc?on chemotherapy in N+ pazents associated with a clinically significant pathological response. Complete pathological nodal response can be achieved, even in pazents with cn2-3 disease, and this corresponds to improved survival. 48% of cn1-3 cases converted to pn0 down staging to pt0 occurred in 24% of cases 38% of pt0 had +N pcr (pt0no) only 14.5% In pazents with cn1-3 disease the best outcomes are seen in those Receiving cispla?n based chemo Same GC and MVAC Have nega?ve margins Complete nodal response at RC. TAKE HOME MESSAGES

Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.045. Epub 2015 Jul 23. EORTC Nomograms and Risk Groups for Predic?ng Recurrence, Progression, and Disease-specific and Overall Survival in Non-Muscle-invasive Stage Ta-T1 Urothelial Bladder Cancer Pa?ents Treated with 1-3 Years of Maintenance Bacillus Calmege- Guérin. Cambier S 1, Sylvester RJ 2, Colle e L 1, Gontero P 3, Brausi MA 4, van Andel G 5, Kirkels WJ 6, Silva FC 7, Oosterlinck W 8, Presco S 9, Kirkali Z 10, Powell PH 11, de Reijke TM 12, Turkeri L 13, Colle e S 1, Oddens J 14. Data for 1812 pazents were merged from two European OrganizaZon for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase 3 trials in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. With a median follow-up of 7.4 yr, 762 pazents recurred; 173 progressed; and 520 died, 83 due to bladder cancer (BCa). StaZsZcally significant prognoszc factors idenzfied by mulzvariable analyses were prior recurrence rate and number of tumors for recurrence, and tumor stage and grade for progression and death due to BCa. T1G3 pazents do poorly, with 1- and 5-yr disease-progression rates of 11.4% and 19.8%, respeczvely, and 1- and 5-yr disease-specific death rates of 4.8% and 11.3%. LimitaZons include lack of repeat transurethral reseczon in high-risk pazents and exclusion of pazents with carcinoma in situ. NMIBC pazents treated with 1-3 yr of maintenance BCG have a heterogeneous prognosis. PaZents at high risk of recurrence and/or progression do poorly on currently recommended maintenance schedules. AlternaZve treatments are urgently required.