Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales. Care Standards Act Inspection Report. ategi Shared Lives Scheme. Cardiff

Similar documents
Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales. Care Standards Act Inspection Report. Aran Hall School

Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales

Scottish Autism - Oban Autism Resources Day Care of Children Lorne Resource Centre Soroba Road Oban PA34 4HY

Applying to waive disqualification: early years and childcare providers

Day care and childminding: Guidance to the National Standards

Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales

General Dental Practice Inspection (Announced) Parkway Cosmetic and Dental Spa (Private Dental Practice) Inspection date: 25 July 2016

Requirements for the Childcare Register: childminders and home childcarers

CSSIW Participation Plan. Working Together to Improve Social Care Services

About this guidance. Introduction. When there are no children on roll

Information about this residential special school

Strategic Plan

Ofsted pre-registration inspection

Drumchapel Supported Youth Housing Project Housing Support Service Units 25 & 26 KCEDG Commercial Centre Ladyloan Place Drumchapel Glasgow G15 8LB

Childminder inspection report. Aitken, Dorothy Dunfermline

Childminder inspection report. Mackay, Jacqueline Dunfermline

Ofsted s regulation and inspection of providers on the Early Years Register from September 2012: common questions and answers

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

Working in Partnership to meet the Childcare Need A Toolkit to support schools and providers / childminders in the provision of out of school care

Hunter, Kerry Child Minding

Beveridge, Diane Child Minding

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

Childminder inspection report. Uhrova, Monika Musselburgh

Review of compliance. Mercia Care Homes Limited Sefton Park. South West. Region: Sefton Park 10 Royal Crescent Weston-super-Mare Somerset BS23 2AX

Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales

Brown, Glenda Child Minding Inverurie

Childminder inspection report. Weiping Childminding Service Edinburgh

Children's homes inspection Full

Welsh, Lorraine Child Minding

Houston, Alice Child Minding

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Outstanding 1. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Outstanding 1

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Outstanding 1. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Outstanding 1

Hemming, Melissa Jane

How Ofsted regulate childcare

Childminder inspection report. Kirkby, Jayne Stranraer

Childminder inspection report. Little Sparkles Childcare Services Lanark

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Outstanding 1. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Outstanding 1

Tenant & Service User Involvement Strategy

Maggie's Childminding Service Child Minding

Bartkowiak, Izabela Child Minding

Rice, Sarah Child Minding

Childminder inspection report. MacIntosh, Stacey Glasgow

Copeland, Diane Child Minding

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

Little Rabbit Child Minding

Achieving Excellence Our Year in Quality...

Childminder inspection report. Mills, Valerie Arbroath

Childminder inspection report. Sloan, Tina Kilmarnock

Ofsted Inspection Report

Lisa's Little Rascals! Child Minding

Childminder inspection report. Mangan, Fiona Alison Greenock

Childminder inspection report. Rennie, Brenda Penicuik

Mahon, Georgina Child Minding

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

Carrington, Colleen Sonia

Protecting Vulnerable Groups Guidance for Care Inspectorate staff and service providers Publication date: October 2012

Childminder inspection report. Rose's Rugrats Wishaw

Nikki's Child Minding

EYFS 2014 changes to the requirements

Children s homes Interim inspection

Limpsfield Grange School

PROTECT INSPECTION. Effectiveness of the leadership and management Outstanding 1. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Outstanding 1

Cheeky Treasures Child Minding

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Outstanding 1. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Outstanding 1

Jigsaw (Cornerstone) Support Service

Childminder inspection report. Nelis, Arlene Greenock

Bonny Kinder Child Minding

Childminder inspection report. Jackie's Childminding Service Glasgow

Messy Nessie Child Care Child Minding

Cameron, Glynis Child Minding

Memorandum of Understanding

Requirements for the Childcare Register: childminders and home childcarers

Childminder inspection report. Mummy Day Care Childminding Service Dundee

Todd, Kylie Child Minding

MODEL CHURCH POLICIES

MS Society Safeguarding Adults Policy and Procedure (Scotland)

Sacro Glasgow Supported Accommodation Service Housing Support Service

Valerie Paton Childminder Child Minding

Mathewson, Amanda Child Minding

Kane, Gail Child Minding

Little Ark - Childminding Child Minding

Bruce, Grace Child Minding

Childminder inspection report. McCulloch, Leigh Cumnock

Building better children s services: Concerns and complaints about childcare providers

Wendy McCann Childminding Child Minding

Childminder inspection report. Bodys, Gillian Cumnock

Policy: Client Involvement and Empowerment

Childminder inspection report. Eleanor Cullen Childminding Glasgow

Childminder inspection report. Fraser, Alison Inverness

Childminder inspection report. Wright, Audrey Livingston

Slessor, Jane Child Minding

Gordon-Orr, Marjory Child Minding

McMillan, Sharon Child Minding

JMT Young Adult Placement Adult Placement Service

Whistleblowing to Ofsted about local authority safeguarding services

Childminder inspection report. Petit Pois Ecossais Ayr

Friday, 13 January 2017 HFEA, 10 Spring Gardens, London SW1A 2BU

Murphy, Lesley Child Minding

Childminder inspection report. Jardine, Jeanne Prestonpans

Transcription:

Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales Care Standards Act 2000 Inspection Report ategi Shared Lives Scheme Cardiff Type of Inspection Focused Date of inspection Monday, 11 January 2016 Date of publication Wednesday, 01 March 2016 Welsh Government Crown copyright 2016. You may use and re-use the information featured in this publication (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government License. You can view the Open Government License, on the National Archives website or you can write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk You must reproduce our material accurately and not use it in a misleading context.

Summary About the service Ategi Limited has been registered with Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) since 2005 to operate an adult placement scheme referred to as: ategi Shared Lives Scheme. The scheme offers long or short term care and support arrangements to people aged over 18 years of age in the homes of adult placement carers across South Wales. The scheme supports adults who have a range of social care support needs. Ategi Limited has a named Responsible Individual and the registered manager of the scheme is Lisa Burnett. Within the current CSSIW inspection year (April 2015 March 2016), ategi shared lives scheme has expanded the geographic area it operates within. In May 2015 it incorporated three existing adult placement schemes from the Neath Port Talbot, Swansea and Bridgend local authority areas, thus adding these three areas to its established scheme covering the Cardiff and Rhondda Cynon Taff areas. What type of inspection was carried out? We (CSSIW) carried out an unannounced, focused inspection as part of our scheduled inspection process. The responsible individual and scheme manager were present during the inspection. Verbal feedback of the inspection findings was provided to the responsible individual; the registered manager was unavailable on the day of the inspection. To inform our report we considered the following: a review of information held by CSSIW about the scheme, this included the previous inspection report, notifications received from the scheme manager in line with Regulation 28 and minutes from a meeting held between CSSIW and the provider to discuss one of these regulatory notifications information shared with us by local authority staff, shared under the Protection of Vulnerable Adults safeguarding procedures consideration of information received from the local authority social work and commissioning teams discussion with the scheme manager, responsible individual and members of the staff team examination of 11 people s care records examination of 8 carers records analysis of 4 questionnaires completed by representatives of people using the scheme analysis of 5 questionnaires completed by adult placement carers of the scheme sampling of other documents maintained by the scheme including their statement of purpose, the scheme guide, a shared lives scheme approval agreement between the scheme and the carer, the schemes protection and safeguarding of vulnerable adults policy and a quality monitoring review dated April 2015. Page 2

What does the service do well? We found areas of consistent good practice and evidence that the scheme has operated with transparency; maintaining positive and responsive working relationships. What has improved since the last inspection? No recommendations for improvements were made following the last inspection in March 2015. What needs to be done to improve the service? No areas of non-compliance with the Adult Placement Schemes (Wales) Regulations 2004 were found during this inspection. The scheme is working to standardise the documentation received as part of its growth to include the three schemes from the Neath Port Talbot, Swansea and Bridgend areas. Much of this has been completed, and a process of audit is ongoing to ensure files contain all the required regulatory information and are therefore, set out in a consistent format for ease of reference, including archiving information to maintain files in an easily manageable format. Page 3

Quality Of Leadership and Management People receiving support arranged by ategi can be assured the scheme is managed and operated in accordance with the Adult Placement Scheme (Wales) Regulations and the National Minimum Standards for adult placement schemes. The registered persons demonstrated a clear understanding of their responsibilities and a commitment to provide a continually improving service. This is because we found the scheme has systems in place for the recruitment, matching and ongoing review of service user placements and shared lives carers. Additionally, the ategi management team had, after discussion with CSSIW in December 2015, revised its decisions and actions following a concern about a change in circumstance for which the scheme had regulatory responsibility. People can be confident that the service has mechanisms in place to ensure that the quality of care is monitored and that any necessary improvements are identified. This is because we reviewed accident and incident records. We found records in a file which we found to contain fully completed incident sheets with details of actions taken. Additionally, we were provided with a copy of the scheme s latest quality review report dated April 2015. This report included details of information received from service users, carers and local authority staff obtained from either completing satisfaction questionnaires or through contact with ategi staff. The scheme received information in which the respondents reported high levels of satisfaction with the service. People are therefore encouraged and enabled to share their views about the service and can be assured their opinions are respected. We received four completed CSSIW questionnaires from service users relatives / advocates expressing complete confidence and satisfaction with the service their relative received. Additionally we received five questionnaires completed by adult placement carers who all provided information about an extensive range of training opportunities that are available to carers, regular meetings and 1:1 support that is provided. Training and support is welcomed by carers and were felt to be positive experiences to support them in their caring role. Comments written in the questionnaires included: excellent support from the whole team, after my initial concerns regarding ategi take over, I now feel quite positive and reassured with their support and ategi is a wonderful scheme to be part of, the whole team are always on hand and helpful. People can also be confident that they will be protected by policies and procedures which will be reviewed and updated regularly. This is because we saw evidence of the current protection and safeguarding of vulnerable adults policy, the Shared Lives scheme approval agreement between ategi and the carer, the statement of purpose and the shared lives scheme guide. The scheme had received a number of compliments during the previous 12 months. We viewed a file containing letters detailing thanks and praise for the quality of care they had provided to service users. They named and thanked particular staff members for the advice and support they had provided. We discussed the process ategi followed to integrate the three existing adult placement schemes into the service and we received a copy of the scheme s regulation 23 report prepared by the responsible individual. The report detailed the management oversight and attention to the continuing provision of a quality service. People using the service, Page 4

and their relatives and carers, can be confident the scheme is managed to ensure an appropriate service that focuses on achieving positive outcomes. Page 5

Quality Of Life People can be confident that they will be listened to and that their views are valued. This is because the service has developed several systems that enable people to give their views and opinions. We saw reports and questionnaires which detailed comments from service users and/or their relatives, these included information about open days, social events and visits by staff from the scheme when people had the opportunity to exchange information and be included in decision making for future developments. We found people s needs are clearly recorded in the required documentation relating to their care needs and shared lives placements. We examined records pertaining to 11 people using the service. The records contained the required information including ategi and local authority care plans and regular reviews, risk assessments (where needed) and signed shared lives agreements. People can be confident their needs are regularly reviewed and that their health and care needs are responded to appropriately. We saw records detailing referrals made to health and social care services. Six monthly formal reviews of service users placements are undertaken by ategi and more frequent reviews are held where there is a change in need or change in circumstance. Individual s needs were clearly documented and examples of person centred plans were evident. People can take assurances that they will be treated with dignity and respect by the scheme staff and by the share lives carers. This is because the staff consider people s views and match carers through a robust process which includes revalidation of carers through a panel decision, on an annual basis. Ategi has reviewed all care files and carer files from all the people who have transferred to ategi from the three schemes mentioned above, work continues to standardise the referencing system within the files. The scheme employs two shared lives co-ordinators and seven assistant coordinators to support the shared lives carer working with the service user in line with their Local Authority assessment and care plan. The coordinators oversee the placements and are responsible for ongoing reviews and support for the service users and carers. People experience appropriate care from people who have an up to date understanding of their individual needs and preferences. We saw written documents that evidenced the way introductions are made between the service users and carers and the discussions and visits which take place before placements are agreed. People can be confident that they will have choice and their rights upheld when using the service. People are supported to pursue their interests and be involved in activities within their local community. We saw records which detailed that service users had been involved in identifying and following their chosen interests. People can have confidence for their wellbeing and protection. This is because we observed that the responsible persons had followed human resources and adult protection procedures in relation to safeguarding issues that had arisen. Page 6

Quality Of Staffing Overall, people can be assured that the adult placement carers have been properly and thoroughly recruited and checked for criminal offences. This is because we found that all people offering the service whose records we checked had been recruited in line with The Adult Placement Schemes (Wales) Regulations 2004. We looked at eight records of people who offered placements in their own homes and found that all had criminal record checks (Disclosure and Barring Service, DBS), suitable references, a full employment history, most had a recent photograph, and documentary evidence of any relevant qualification. During our 2014-15 inspection, the recruitment of carers and staff was considered to be robust with safe systems in place. We concluded that the scheme continues to operate robust and safe practices. The outcome for the people using the service was that the people caring for them had been properly and thoroughly recruited to ensure their safety and welfare. Adult placement carers are well supported by the scheme. We saw that the service had systems in place to obtain feedback from carers, share information and deliver training to them. Carers received regular visits from scheme staff, had been offered training and had a named person to contact if they had any issues to discuss. We saw evidence in the records viewed of carer assessment and agreement forms. There was also written evidence of training having been completed which was relevant and appropriate to the needs of the person/people they were supporting, and regular and frequent Carer s meetings. Page 7

Quality Of The Environment The agency operates from designated premises that are suitably equipped for the purposes of the day to day operation and management of the service. People using the service can have confidence that their personal information is kept securely. The Quality of Environment theme was not otherwise explored at this inspection in accordance with the current CSSIW inspection process for adult placement schemes. Page 8

How we inspect and report on services We conduct two types of inspection; baseline and focused. Both consider the experience of people using services. Baseline inspections assess whether the registration of a service is justified and whether the conditions of registration are appropriate. For most services, we carry out these inspections every three years. Exceptions are registered child minders, out of school care, sessional care, crèches and open access provision, which are every four years. At these inspections we check whether the service has a clear, effective Statement of Purpose and whether the service delivers on the commitments set out in its Statement of Purpose. In assessing whether registration is justified inspectors check that the service can demonstrate a history of compliance with regulations. Focused inspections consider the experience of people using services and we will look at compliance with regulations when poor outcomes for people using services are identified. We carry out these inspections in between baseline inspections. Focused inspections will always consider the quality of life of people using services and may look at other areas. Baseline and focused inspections may be scheduled or carried out in response to concerns. Inspectors use a variety of methods to gather information during inspections. These may include; Talking with people who use services and their representatives Talking to staff and the manager Looking at documentation Observation of staff interactions with people and of the environment Comments made within questionnaires returned from people who use services, staff and health and social care professionals We inspect and report our findings under Quality Themes. Those relevant to each type of service are referred to within our inspection reports. Further information about what we do can be found in our leaflet Improving Care and Social Services in Wales. You can download this from our website, Improving Care and Social Services in Wales or ask us to send you a copy by telephoning your local CSSIW regional office. Page 9