BREAST CANCER SCREENING:
|
|
- Mervin Baldwin Chase
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BREAST CANCER SCREENING: controversies D David Dershaw Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY Areas of general agreement about mammographic screening Screening mammography has been demonstrated to save lives of women in meta analysis of RCTs Screening mammography is recommended for normal risk women ages by all major medical groups The test is imperfect with harms Screening Concepts Breast cancer screening is like using seatbelts: most users will never need it must be used chronically to have an impact it does not prevent even thought you use it, you may die it can harm you 1
2 US BREAST CANCER MORTALITY Mammo screening starts in USA ~30% reduction Breast cancer 5 year survival by stage at diagnosis 99% 84% 23% US Breast Cancer Incidence Rates By Stage of Disease per 100, 000 Cases Year In Situ Incidence Rates Stage IV Incidence Rates Stage I Incidence Rates Source: SEER 2
3 Swedish 2 county trial: Screening Impact on Breast Cancer Mortality with 29 Year Followup Tabar. Radiology 2011; 260: Relative risk of breast cancer death for those invited to screen vs not invited = Screening 300 women for 10 years prevents one breast cancer death. Longer followup (at least 20 years) shows an increasing advantage to screening by Radiological Society of North America Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: Breast cancer mortality screened vs nonscreened attending Non attenders Ever attended Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: Breast cancer mortality screened vs nonscreened attending Non attenders 62% reduction at 13 years Ever attended 3
4 Breast Cancer Death Rate: vs THE SAME THERAPIES ARE AVAILBLE TO MEN AND WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER Since the mid 1990 s death rate from breast cancer for women has fallen 34% (34 22/100,000) Since mid 1990 s death rate from breast cancer for men has not changed ( /100,000) CONCEPT: M REBNER US DEATHS FROM BREAST CANCER/100,000 WOMEN: BY AGE source: ACS, 2003 Mortality Reduction in Prospective Randomized Trials of Mammography 35 HIP (7-38) 30 Malmo (-8-39) 25 Two county (20-41) 20 Edinburgh (-2-40) 15 Gothenburg (-39-49) 10 NBSS (-26-27) 5 NBSS (-33-22) 0 Stockholm (-10-50) -5 All (18-30) 4
5 Limitations in Prospective Randomized Trials for Mammographic Screening Comparison of invited for mammography vs not invited for mammography not comparison of got screened vs didn t get screened Only 1/3 of invited underwent all screening About 10% of uninvited underwent screening outside the trial Interval between mammograms was variable, ranging from 12 months to three years Quality of mammography in some trials, particularly NBSS, was judged to be poor by outside experts Therefore, these trials underestimate the value of mammographic screening Problems in Demonstrating Mortality Reduction by Mammographic Screening for Women Lower breast cancer incidence Only 1/3 of women in studies are in this decade of age Higher rates of DCIS with longer time to impact on mortality requires longer followup to demonstrate advantage Shorter lead time for invasive cancers requires shorter interval mammography BREAST CANCER INCIDENCE VS AGE SEER data
6 If current age is... Probability of developing breast cancer in next 10 years is Or 1 in: % 05% 2, % % 69 Biennial (USPSTF) vs Annual Lives Saved per 1000 Women Screened Hendrick, Helvie. AJR 2012 Age Biennial Annual % Improvement 40 s % 50 s % 60 s % 70 s % Biennial (USPSTF) vs Annual (ACS, NCCN)Life Years Gained (LYG) Henrick, Helvie AJR 2011; Mandelblatt Ann Int Med 2009 LYG/1000 % MORTALITY REDUCTION B % A % Difference 79 (72%) 16.3 (71%) 6
7 Harms For women ages undergoing annual screening incidence of these harms is: False positive biopsy /1000 screened years Additional imaging 84 64/1000 screened years Annual vs Biennial Harms Assuming annual = q 9 18 months and biennial = q months: At 10 years: annual biennial RECALL 61% 42% 47% BIOPSY 7% 5% 42% Stage III,IV(40 49) %* Hubbard. Ann Intern Med 2011 *statistically significant value Natural History of DCIS Diagnosis of DCIS has increased from 2.4 to 27.7/100,000 women from 1981 to 2001 due to screening Discovery and treatment of DCIS in premenopausal women results in decreased breast cancer mortality at > 7 years Incidence of DCIS in screen detected cancers is: Up to 50% premenopausal 25% postmenopausal 7
8 Evidence for the progression of DCIS to invasive cancer 50% of all recurrences after DCIS conservation treatment are invasive Longterm followup of low grade DCIS treated only by biopsy without definitive excision or RT have at 30 years 30 60% incidence of invasive carcinoma, usually at or near the DCIS site The grade and histology of DCIS and related IFDC is usually similar DCIS decreases with advancing age as IFDC increases Cady. J Surg Oncol 1998; 69:60 Evidence for the progression of DCIS to invasive cancer Risk factors for DCIS and invasive cancer are similar Thereis a progression of genetic changes from atypia to DCIS to invasive cancer suggesting progression of atypia to DCIS finally resulting in invasive cancer Cady. J Surg Oncol 1998; 69:60 Percentage of Cancers (A) and Absolute # (B) of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) per 1000 mammograms. Percentage of all cancers found at screening Number of cases of DCIS found at screening Ernster V L et al. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94: Oxford University Press 8
9 Recurrence rates after treatment for DCIS varying by grade as indicated by tumor necrosis With necrosis Without t necrosis Fisher ER. Cancer 1999; 86:429 BMJ: NBSS 25 YEAR F/U Twenty five year follow up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial BMJ 2014; 348 doi: (Published 11 February 2014) All cause mortality, by assignment to mammography or control arms (all participants) Miller A B et al. BMJ 2014;348:bmj.g by British Medical Journal Publishing Group 9
10 OVER EXACTLY THE SAME TIME PERIOD THESE TWO OUTCOMES REPORTED SURVIVAL IN CANADA MORTALITY IN NORWAY NONATTENDERS ATTENDERS OVER EXACTLY THE SAME TIME PERIOD THESE TWO OUTCOMES REPORTED SURVIVAL IN CANADA MORTALITY IN NORWAY NO DIFFERENCE 62% MORTALITY REDUCTION NONATTENDERS ATTENDERS HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? Mortality Reduction in Prospective Randomized Trials of Mammography 35 HIP 30 Malmo 25 Two county 20 Edinburgh 15 Gothenburg 10 NBSS-1 5 NBSS-2 Stockholm 0 All -5 10
11 Mortality Reduction in Prospective Randomized Trials of Mammography 35 HIP 30 Malmo 25 Two county 20 Edinburgh 15 Gothenburg 10 NBSS-1 5 NBSS-2 Stockholm 0 All -5 CANADIAN STUDIES Mortality Reduction in Prospective Randomized Trials of Mammography 35 HIP 30 Malmo 25 Two county Edinburgh Gothenburg NBSS-1 NBSS-2 Stockholm All EVERY OTHER PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL CANADIAN STUDIES NBSS MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY Documented poor quality mammography. 1.Old devices (10 years old in Vancouver) at least 1 second hand. 2Nogrids 2.No 3.No training for techs used straight lateral not MLO 4.No training for the radiologists 5.Mammo size cancers = 1.9 cm Controls = 2.1 cm 11
12 "..in my work as reference physicist to the NBSS, [I] identified many concerns regarding the quality of mammography carried out in some of the NBSS screening centers. That quality [in the NBSS] was far below state of the art, even for that time (early 1980's). Yaffe MJ. Correction: Canada Study. Letter to the Editor JNCI 1993;85:94). NBSS Study Design A positive mammogram did not lead to a biopsy but to a surgical consultation to determine the need for biopsy. About 25% of recommended biopsies based on an abnormal mammogram were never performed. NBSS: FAULTY RANDOMIZATION For unexplained reasons, more women with advanced breast cancers were randomized to the screening arm vs control arm: While Canada in general had a 75% 5 year breast cancer survival rate, the control arm had 90% 5 year survival Women diagnosed with >4 positive nodes in the first year were 19 in the study arm and 11 in the control At seven years there were 29 breast cancer deaths in the study arm vs 18 in the control group 12
13 Baseline Incidence The incidence data from the first year in which breast cancer incidence was recorded (1973) were almost certainly spuriously low (which would bias our estimates of excess detection upward). The data from the subsequent 2 years (1974 and 1975) were above average for the decade Since these years show low and high incidences of breast cancer, using them would estimate a higher incidence of expected breast cancer than the authors published. Therefore, they chose different years to calculate baseline. Consequently, we chose the 3 year period 1976 through 1978 to obtain our estimate of the baseline incidence of breast cancer In 1973 Happy Rockefeller and in 1974 Betty Ford announced they had breast cancer. The increased use of mammography at that time resulted in the early diagnosis of breast cancers that would have presented clinically in the following few years and resulted in a decrease in breast cancer incidence during the period. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: Due to screening alone, in 2008 breast cancer was overdiagnosed in more than 70,000 women; this accounted for 31% of all breast cancers diagnosed Bleyer and Welch claim that t since there were more cancers diagnosed in 2008 than they ESTIMATED should have occurred, that excess must be fake cancers and due to overdiagnosis. ov er di ag no sis They estimated a 0.25% increase per year in breast cancer incidence 13
14 Breast cancer incidence rates: SEER data Garfinkel el at. Cancer 1994; 74:222 7 Breast cancer incidence rates: SEER data Garfinkel el at. Cancer 1994; 74:222 7 BREAST CANCER IS INCREASING 1% PER YEAR US BREAST CANCER INCIDENCE 1940: 60 INVASIVE CANCERS/100,000 WOMEN 1980: 100 INVASIVE CANCERS/100,000 WOMEN Over 40 years there was an increase of 40 invasive cancers/100,000 women which is a 1% increase annually 14
15 Actually fewer invasive breast cancers than expected have occurred US BREAST CANCER INCIDENCE Since the start of mammographic screening, the increase in invasive cancers has slowed, although the diagnosis of DCIS has increased. This suggests that DCIS treatment interrupts the development of invasive cancers. And that the diagnosis of invasive cancer is not overaggressive, but that the treatment of in situ cancers is preventative. Mammographic screening: Reduces breast cancer deaths in women 40 and older Is best done as an annual examination Results in a small number of women having additional imaging and, rarely, biopsies for benign conditions Earlier diagnosis improves treatment options Earlier diagnosis decreases medical costs 15
16 Bad science leads to bad medicine 16
Overdiagnosis of Breast Cancer: Myths and Facts
Overdiagnosis of Breast Cancer: Myths and Facts Mark A. Helvie, MD Department of Radiology Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Michigan Health System April 7, 2016 Objectives Define overdiagnosis
More informationGeneral principles of screening: A radiological perspective
General principles of screening: A radiological perspective Fergus Coakley MD, Professor and Chair, Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University General principles of screening: A radiological
More informationBreast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening Eileen Rakovitch MD MSc FRCPC Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Medical Director, Louise Temerty Breast Cancer Centre LC Campbell Chair in Breast Cancer Research Associate Professor,
More informationSBI Breast Imaging Symposium 2016 Austin Texas, April 7, 2016
Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: An Update SBI Breast Imaging Symposium 2016 Austin Texas, April 7, 2016 Robert A. Smith, PhD Cancer Control Department American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA I have
More informationCurrent Strategies in the Detection of Breast Cancer. Karla Kerlikowske, M.D. Professor of Medicine & Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF
Current Strategies in the Detection of Breast Cancer Karla Kerlikowske, M.D. Professor of Medicine & Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF Outline ν Screening Film Mammography ν Film ν Digital ν Screening
More information5/24/16. Current Issues in Breast Cancer Screening. Breast cancer screening guidelines. Outline
Disclosure information: An Evidence based Approach to Breast Cancer Karla Kerlikowske, MDDis Current Issues in Breast Cancer Screening Grant/Research support from: National Cancer Institute - and - Karla
More informationBreast Imaging! Ravi Adhikary, MD!
Breast Imaging! Ravi Adhikary, MD! ACS Estimated Cancers Statistics 2014! Breast! New Cases in Women! 232,670 (+67,570 in situ)! Deaths in Women! 40,000! Colon! 48,380! 24,040! Cervical! 12,360! 4,020!
More informationBreast Screening: risks if you do and risks if you don t. Stephen W. Duffy Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
Breast Screening: risks if you do and risks if you don t Stephen W. Duffy Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine General principle There is often discussion of benefits and harms of breast screening
More informationGENERAL COMMENTS. The Task Force Process Should be Fully Open, Balanced and Transparent
December 9, 2013 Submitted Electronically United States Preventive Services Task Force c/o Dr. Robert Cosby Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 RE: USPSTF Draft
More informationMammography Screening: A New Estimate of Number Needed to Screen to Prevent One Breast Cancer Death
Women s Imaging Original Research Hendrick and Helvie Mammography Screening Women s Imaging Original Research R. Edward Hendrick 1 Mark A. Helvie 2 Hendrick RE, Helvie MA Keywords: mammography screening,
More informationLearning and Earning with Gateway Professional Education CME/CEU Webinar Series. Breast Cancer Screening September 21, :00pm 1:00pm
Learning and Earning with Gateway Professional Education CME/CEU Webinar Series Breast Cancer Screening September 21, 2017 12:00pm 1:00pm Robert A. Smith, PhD Vice President, Cancer Screening American
More informationUnited States Preventive Services Task Force Screening Mammography Recommendations: Science Ignored
Women s Imaging Perspective Hendrick and Helvie Mammography Screening Recommendations Women s Imaging Perspective FOCUS ON: R. Edward Hendrick 1 Mark A. Helvie 2 Hendrick RE, Helvie MA Keywords: breast,
More informationControversies in Breast Cancer Screening
Controversies in Breast Cancer Screening Arash Naeim, MD PhD Associate Professor of Medicine Divisions of Hematology-Oncology and Geriatric Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine University of California,
More informationScreening Mammography Policy and Politics. Kevin L. Piggott, MD, MPH August 29, 2015
Screening Mammography Policy and Politics Kevin L. Piggott, MD, MPH August 29, 2015 Objectives 1. To review the current recommendations for screening mammography by various national groups 2. To provide
More informationCancer Screening: Evidence, Opinion and Fact Dialogue on Cancer April Ruth Etzioni Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Cancer Screening: Evidence, Opinion and Fact Dialogue on Cancer April 2018? Ruth Etzioni Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Three thoughts to begin 1. Cancer screening is a good idea in principle Detect
More informationEARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY
EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Breast Cancer Screening Early detection of
More informationScreening Mammography for Women Aged 40 to 49 Years at Average Risk for Breast Cancer
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 2007; Vol. 7, No. 1 Screening Mammography for Women Aged 40 to 49 Years at Average Risk for Breast Cancer An Evidence-Based Analysis January 2007 Medical Advisory
More informationBreast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening Claire Frost, MD R3 Talks 1 Objective 1. Understand risks and benefits of screening by reviewing current literature 2. Evaluate major society recommendations on breast cancer screening
More informationBreast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening Ravinder S. Legha 1, Jessica Wai Ting Leung After skin cancer, breast cancer is the cancer most diagnosed in U.S. women and has the second highest death rate. Breast cancer will
More informationUpdate in Breast Cancer Screening
Disclosure information: Update in Breast Cancer Screening Karla Kerlikowske, MDDis Update in Breast Cancer Screening Grant/Research support from: National Cancer Institute - and - Karla Kerlikowske, MD
More informationEARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY
EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Breast Cancer Screening Early detection of
More informationUpdate in Breast Cancer Screening
Disclosure information: Update in Breast Cancer Screening Karla Kerlikowske, MDDis Update in Breast Cancer Screening Grant/Research support from: National Cancer Institute and Grail - and - Karla Kerlikowske,
More informationEpidemiologic Methods for Evaluating Screening Programs. Rosa M. Crum, MD, MHS Johns Hopkins University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationScreening Overdiagnosis. Archie Bleyer, MD Department of Radiation Medicine Knight Cancer Institute at the Oregon Health & Science University
Screening Overdiagnosis Archie Bleyer, MD Department of Radiation Medicine Knight Cancer Institute at the Oregon Health & Science University NNS Bottom Line I To prevent 1 death from breast cancer, 2,250
More informationWhy study changes in breast cancer rates over time? How did we study these changes in breast cancer rates?
Breast Cancer Trends in Hong Kong: What are the Implications for Screening, Diagnosis and Management in All Chinese Women? GM Leung, TH Lam, TQ Thach, AJ Hedley Department of Community Medicine, HKU W
More informationBreast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Priya Thomas, MD Assistant Professor Clinical Cancer Prevention and Breast Medical Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Disclosures Dr. Thomas has
More informationBreast Cancer Screening: Successes and Challenges
Breast Cancer Screening: Successes and Challenges W. Phil Evans, MD, Director, Center for Breast Care, George and Carol Poston Professor for Breast Cancer Research, Clinical Professor of Radiology, University
More informationStudy Design of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials of Breast Cancer Screening
Study Design of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials of Breast Cancer Screening Eugenio Paci, Freda E. Alexander* Evaluation of population screening must be based on a randomized clinical trial (RCT)
More informationHow often should I get a mammogram?
How often should I get a mammogram? Ages 50-74 BREAST CANCER SCREENING This photo is for illustrative purposes only, and the person depicted in the photograph is a model. An affiliation between Central
More informationBreast Cancer Risk Factors 8/3/2014
Breast Cancer Screening: Changing Philosophies in Educating Women and Teens Courtney Benedict CNM MSN Session Objectives Explain the rationale for initiation and frequency of clinical breast exams to clients
More informationRadiation and DCIS. The 16 th Annual Conference on A Multidisciplinary Approach to Comprehensive Breast Care and Imaging
Radiation and DCIS The 16 th Annual Conference on A Multidisciplinary Approach to Comprehensive Breast Care and Imaging Einsley-Marie Janowski, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Radiation Oncology
More informationScreening: Past and Future perfect? Rosalind Given-Wilson Consultant Radiologist St Georges University Hospitals FT
Screening: Past and Future perfect? Rosalind Given-Wilson Consultant Radiologist St Georges University Hospitals FT Screening past Where are we now? Questions for the future: Whether to screen? How to
More informationPopulation Prospective. Big Picture
Mai Elezaby, MD? Population Prospective Big Picture Breast Cancer Most common cancer in women 2 nd leading cause of death U.S. 2016 estimates 246,660 new cases 40,450 deaths from breast cancer https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html
More informationBreast Cancer Screening: Changing Philosophies in Educating Women and Teens
Breast Cancer Screening: Changing Philosophies in Educating Women and Teens Courtney Benedict CNM MSN Disclosures Merck Nexplanon trainer Session Objectives Explain the rationale for initiation and frequency
More informationClinical Trials. Amy Liu. October 30, Cancer Care Ontario. Introduction to Statistical Methods for.
Introduction to Cancer Care Ontario amy.liu@cancercare.on.ca October 30, 2014 44-1 Early Detection Trials for Cancer 44-2 PSA recommendation 44-3 Screening Screening (Miettinen 2011): Pursuit of early
More informationEffect of Three Decades of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer Incidence
T h e n e w e ngl a nd j o u r na l o f m e dic i n e original article Effect of Three Decades of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer Incidence Archie Bleyer, M.D., and H. Gilbert Welch, M.D., M.P.H.
More informationIL Balance Sheet dei programmi di screening mammografici dell Unione Europea
Seminario di studio LA SORVEGLIANZA EPIDEMIOLOGICA DELLO SCREENING DEI TUMORI DELLA MAMMELLA NELLA REGIONE EMILIA-ROMAGNA Bologna, 18 marzo 2013 IL Balance Sheet dei programmi di screening mammografici
More information6. SUMMARY. 6.1 Breast cancer
6. SUMMARY 6.1 Breast cancer Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and the most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Globally, it is estimated that in 2012 there were
More informationHTA commissioned call
HTA commissioned call BACKGROUND 2002 NICE Guidance for Early Breast Cancer Discharge asymptomatic patients from hospital follow-up by 3 years. 2007 Questioning specialists attitudes to breast cancer follow-up
More informationWhen do you need PET/CT or MRI in early breast cancer?
When do you need PET/CT or MRI in early breast cancer? Elizabeth A. Morris MD FACR Chief, Breast Imaging Service Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center NY, NY Objectives What is the role of MRI in initial
More informationLife expectancy in the United States continues to lengthen.
Reduced Mammographic Screening May Explain Declines in Breast Carcinoma in Older Women Robert M. Kaplan, PhD and Sidney L. Saltzstein, MD, MPH wz OBJECTIVES: To examine whether declines in breast cancer
More informationExamine breast cancer trends, statistics, and death rates, and impact of screenings. Discuss benefits and risks of screening
Define Breast Cancer Screening Examine breast cancer trends, statistics, and death rates, and impact of screenings Discuss benefits and risks of screening Compare and contrast Screening Guidelines Optimal
More informationAre We Ready to Predict Who is at Risk For What Kind of Breast Cancer? NOT YET NO DISCLOSURES 3/7/2015. Laura Esserman MD MBA
Are We Ready to Predict Who is at Risk For What Kind of Breast Cancer? NOT YET But soon.... Laura Esserman MD MBA 2 Breast Cancer Gene Expression Profiling Prognostic Tests 1. OncotypeDX Recurrence Score
More informationNitin K. Tanna, M.D. Section Chief of Mammography and Breast Imaging Susan H. Arnold Center for Breast Health Lancaster Radiology Associates
Nitin K. Tanna, M.D. Section Chief of Mammography and Breast Imaging Susan H. Arnold Center for Breast Health Lancaster Radiology Associates INTRODUCTION When the United States Preventive Service Task
More informationProstate Cancer Screening. Eric Shreve, MD Bend Urology Associates
Prostate Cancer Screening Eric Shreve, MD Bend Urology Associates University of Cincinnati Medical Center University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics PSA Human kallikrein 3 Semenogelin is substrate Concentration
More informationCancer Screening 2014
Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Family & Community Medicine Presentations and Grand Rounds Department of Family & Community Medicine 4-11-2014 Cancer Screening 2014
More informationSurgical Pathology Issues of Practical Importance
Surgical Pathology Issues of Practical Importance Anne Moore, MD Medical Oncology Syed Hoda, MD Surgical Pathology The pathologist is central to the team approach needed to manage the patient with breast
More informationCurrent Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound
Current Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound Stephen A. Feig, M.D., FACR Fong and Jean Tsai Professor of Women s Imaging Department of Radiologic Sciences University of California,
More informationALTERNATIVE FACTS IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING
ALTERNATIVE FACTS IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING Daniel B. Kopans, M.D. Professor of Radiology Harvard Medical School Founder - Breast Imaging Division Massachusetts General Hospital 50 YEARS OF MISINFORMATION
More informationDiagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer
Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis Early Detection and Diagnosis Version 2005: Junkermann Version 2006 2009: Schreer / Albert Version
More informationKey outcomes for studies on breast cancer screening
Key outcomes for studies on breast cancer screening Mireille Broeders, PhD 10 December 2015, Plenary ECIBC, Baveno Dept for Health Evidence, Radboudumc & Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen,
More informationRadiology Rounds A Newsletter for Referring Physicians Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Radiology
Radiology Rounds A Newsletter for Referring Physicians Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Radiology Special Issue Response to the Recent US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations for
More informationShould I Get a Mammogram?
Should I Get a Mammogram? Ages 75+ BREAST CANCER SCREENING This photo is for illustrative purposes only, and the person depicted in the photograph is a model. An affiliation between Central Washington
More informationProphylactic Mastectomy State of the Art
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 6 th Brazilian Breast Cancer Conference Sao Paulo, Brazil 9 March 2012 Prophylactic Mastectomy State of the Art Monica Morrow
More informationBreast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening October 7, 2011 Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Nicole Hodgson, Donna Ciliska, Leslea Peirson, Mary Gauld, Yan Yun Liu McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada CTFPHC Leads: Marcello
More informationNational Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1
National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 December 8-12, 2013 Disney s Yacht Club Resort Lake Buena Vista, Florida Self Assessment Module Questions, Answers and References Day SAM Title - Each SAM title
More informationMethodologicOverview of Screening Studies
MethodologicOverview of Screening Studies Diana L. Miglioretti, PhD University of California Davis Thanks to William Black, MD for many of these slides! 1/11/17 RSNA CTMW 2017 1 Learning Objectives Understand
More informationMammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand
Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand Introduction Contents Mammographic signs of nonpalpable breast cancer
More informationRethinking Breast Cancer Screening
Rethinking Breast Cancer Screening NAMS Meeting, October, 2014 Russell Harris, MD, MPH University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Conflicts of Interest Financial: none Intellectual: I have been researching
More informationCNB vs Surgical Excision
Update on Core Needle Biopsy of Non-palpable Breast Lesions Nour Sneige, M.D. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Tx Image-Guided CNB of Breast Lesions An alternative to surgical biospy CNB vs Surgical
More informationImaging Surveillance in Women with a History of Treated Breast Cancer. Wei Tse Yang, M.D.
Imaging Surveillance in Women with a History of Treated Breast Cancer Wei Tse Yang, M.D. Breast Cancer 1. Extent 2. Response 3. Recurrence Surveillance Breast Cancer 1. Extent 2. Response Surveillance
More informationCite this article as: BMJ, doi: /bmj f (published 8 March 2005)
Cite this article as: BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.38398.469479.8f (published 8 March 2005) Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices Alexandra Barratt, Kirsten Howard,
More informationEffect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality in the UK Age trial at 17 years follow-up: a randomised controlled trial
Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality in the UK Age trial at 17 years follow-up: a randomised controlled trial Sue M Moss, Christopher Wale, Robert Smith, Andrew
More informationMANAGEMENT OF DENSE BREASTS. Nichole K Ingalls, MD, MPH NW Surgical Specialists September 25, 2015
MANAGEMENT OF DENSE BREASTS Nichole K Ingalls, MD, MPH NW Surgical Specialists September 25, 2015 No financial disclosures National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute Increased Cancer Risk... DENSITY
More informationDisclosures. Premalignant Lesions of the Breast: What Clinicians Want and Why. NY Times: Prone to Error: Earliest Steps to Find Cancer.
Disclosures Premalignant Lesions of the Breast: What Clinicians Want and Why I have nothing to disclose Rick Baehner, MD Assistant Professor, UCSF Pathology NY Times: Prone to Error: Earliest Steps to
More informationNonpalpable Breast Cancer in Women Aged Years: A Surgeon s View of Benefits From Screening Mammography
Nonpalpable Breast Cancer in Women Aged 40 49 Years: A Surgeon s View of Benefits From Screening Mammography Helena R. Chang, Bernard Cole, Kirby I. Bland* While mammography screening among women aged
More informationBR 1 Palpable breast lump
BR 1 Palpable breast lump Palpable breast lump in patient 40 years of age or above MMG +/- spot compression or digital breast tomosynthesis over palpable findings Suspicious or malignant findings (BIRADS
More informationRole of ultrasound in breast cancer screening. Daerim St. Mary Hospital Department of Surgery, Breast care center Dongwon-Kim, M.D.
Role of ultrasound in breast cancer screening Daerim St. Mary Hospital Department of Surgery, Breast care center Dongwon-Kim, M.D. Backgrounds Ultrasound is essential tool in local clinic. US plays an
More informationSteven Jubelirer, MD Clinical Professor Medicine WVU Charleston Division Senior Research Scientist CAMC Research Institute
Steven Jubelirer, MD Clinical Professor Medicine WVU Charleston Division Senior Research Scientist CAMC Research Institute Objectives Develop a systematic way to think about benefits and harms of cancer
More informationAnnual Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women 75 Years Old or Older: To Screen or Not to Screen
Women s Imaging Original Research Hartman et al. Annual Screening Mammography of Women 75 Years Old or Older Women s Imaging Original Research Maya Hartman 1 Michele Drotman Elizabeth Kagan Arleo Hartman
More informationReview of sojourn time calculation models used in breast cancer screening
Review of sojourn time calculation models used in breast cancer screening Shan Cheung, Jane L. Hutton, Julia A. Brettschneider August 2017 Abstract For decades, researchers have been estimating sojourn
More informationRecurrence following Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Recurrence following Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction Aldona J. Spiegel, M.D., and Charles E. Butler, M.D. Houston, Texas Skin-sparing
More informationTMIST A Bridge to Personalized Screening. Canadian Society of Breast Imaging April 26, 2018
TMIST A Bridge to Personalized Screening Canadian Society of Breast Imaging April 26, 2018 Topics 1. Overview of TMIST Aims and Methods 2. Status of the Study (4/13/18) 3. How your site (in Canada) can
More informationFinancial Disclosures
Financial Disclosures 3D Mammography: The Latest Developments in the Breast Imaging Arena I have no financial disclosures Dr. Katharine Lampen-Sachar Breast and Body Radiologist Radiology Associates of
More informationThe Excess of Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in Young Women Screened with Mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study
997 The Excess of Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in Young Women Screened with Mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study Robert E. Tarone, Ph.D. Background. An unexpected excess
More informationBREAST MRI. Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School
BREAST MRI Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School BREAST MRI Any assessment of the breast parenchyma requires the administration
More informationThe subject of breast cancer screening is complicated.
COUNTERPOINTS Current Controversies in Hematology and Oncology Screening Mammography: Do the Benefits Always Outweigh the Harms? saved my life is a common refrain from women who have been screened and
More informationCancer Screening: Controversial Topics 10/27/17. Vijay Kudithipudi, MD Kettering Cancer Care Radiation Oncology
Cancer Screening: Controversial Topics 10/27/17 Vijay Kudithipudi, MD Kettering Cancer Care Radiation Oncology Meet the Radiation Oncologists E Ronald Hale, MD, MPH Matthew Knecht, MD Anthony Paravati,
More informationBreast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk
1/51 Special Communication October 20, 2015 Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society 1 2 3 Kevin C. Oeffinger, MD ; Elizabeth T. H. Fontham,
More informationSCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER BREAST IMAGING
SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER BREAST IMAGING Liane Philpotts, MD, FSBI, FACR Professor, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging Division Chief, Breast Imaging Dec. 5, 2017 Warner, E. NEJM 2011 Screening for
More informationHandheld Radiofrequency Spectroscopy for Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Margins During Breast-Conserving Surgery
Last Review Status/Date: December 2014 Page: 1 of 6 Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Description Breast-conserving surgery as part of the treatment of localized breast cancer is optimally achieved
More informationDuctal Carcinoma in Situ. Laura C. Collins, M.D. Department of Pathology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Laura C. Collins, M.D. Department of Pathology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA Definition of DCIS WHO 2012 A neoplastic proliferation
More informationBI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1
Susan G. Orel, MD Nicole Kay, BA Carol Reynolds, MD Daniel C. Sullivan, MD BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1 Index terms: Breast, biopsy, 00.1261 Breast neoplasms, localization, 00.125,
More informationBreast Cancer Screening and Treatment Mrs Belinda Scott Breast Surgeon Breast Associates Auckland
Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment 2009 Mrs Belinda Scott Breast Surgeon Breast Associates Auckland BREAST CANCER THE PROBLEM 1.1 million women per year 410,000 deaths each year Increasing incidence
More informationChief Investigator Adele Francis University of Birmingham UK. Prof MWR Reed (CoI) University of Sheffield
The LORIS Trial: A multicentre, randomised phase III trial of standard surgery versus active monitoring in women with newly diagnosed low risk ductal carcinoma in situ. Chief Investigator Adele Francis
More informationEffective Health Care Program
Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 19 Effective Health Care Program Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions Executive Summary Background
More informationBreastScreen Victoria Annual Statistical Report
BreastScreen Victoria Annual Statistical Report 005 Produced by: BreastScreen Victoria Coordination Unit Level, Pelham Street, Carlton South Victoria 05 PH 0 9660 6888 FX 0 966 88 EM info@breastscreen.org.au
More informationTissue Breast Density
Tissue Breast Density Reporting breast density within the letter to the patient is now mandated by VA law. Therefore, this website has been established by Peninsula Radiological Associates (PRA), the radiologists
More information3/21/11 Tabar et al Lancet 2003;361:
1 2 3 Tabar et al Lancet 2003;361:1405-1410 4 Tabar et al Lancet 2003;361:1405-1410 Tabar Rad Clin NA 2000;38:625-652, via R. Edward Hendrick, PhD, U. Colorado 5 6 7 8 Screening 40-49 50-59 60-69 Interval
More informationDuctal Carcinoma-in-Situ: New Concepts and Controversies
Ductal Carcinoma-in-Situ: New Concepts and Controversies James J. Stark, MD, FACP Medical Director, Cancer Program and Palliative Care Maryview Medical Center Professor of Medicine, EVMS Case Presentation
More informationTRIAL SYNOPSIS LORIS. The Low Risk DCIS Trial. Chief Investigator. Miss Adele Francis
TRIAL SYNOPSIS LORIS Chief Investigator The Low Risk DCIS Trial Miss Adele Francis ISRCTN No. 27544579 Sponsor University of Birmingham, United Kingdom Trial Design Objectives of Feasibility Study A multi-centre,
More informationThe best way of detection of and screening for breast cancer in women with genetic or hereditary risk
The best way of detection of and screening for breast cancer in women with genetic or hereditary risk Ingrid Vogelaar Introduction Each year almost 1.2 million women are diagnosed with breast cancer worldwide.
More informationMammography Screening for Breast Cancer
C l i n i c a l D e c i s i o n s Interactive at Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer This interactive feature addresses the approach to a clinical issue. A case vignette is followed by specific options,
More informationDigital Breast Tomosynthesis Ready for Routine Screening?
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Ready for Routine Screening? Sophia Zackrisson MD, PhD, Assoc Prof of Radiology Skåne University Healthcare, Lund University, Sweden 1 Mammography screening 20% reduced breast
More informationThe U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) CLINICAL GUIDELINE
Annals of Internal Medicine CLINICAL GUIDELINE Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Albert L. Siu, MD, MSPH, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services
More informationInterpretation of Breast Pathology in the Era of Minimally Invasive Procedures
Shahla Masood, M.D. Professor and Chair Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville Medical Director, UF Health Breast Center Chief of Pathology
More informationNews You Can Use: Recent Studies that Changed My Practice
News You Can Use: Recent Studies that Changed My Practice Melissa McNeil, MD, MPH Chief, Section of Women s Health Division of General Internal Medicine University of Pittsburgh Sarah Tilstra, MD, MSc
More informationBMJ 2014;348:g366 doi: /bmj.g366 (Published 11 February 2014) Page 1 of 10
BMJ 2014;348:g366 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g366 (Published 11 February 2014) Page 1 of 10 Research Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening
More informationShould women under 50 be screened for breast cancer?
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 413 417 All rights reserved 0007 0920/04 $30.00 www.bjcancer.com Minireview *,1 1 Institute of Cancer Research Cancer Screening, Evaluation Unit Block D, 15 Cotswold
More informationBruno CUTULI Policlinico Courlancy REIMS. WORKSHOP SULL IRRADIAZIONE MAMMARIA IPOFRAZIONATA Il carcinoma duttale in situ
Bruno CUTULI Policlinico Courlancy REIMS WORKSHOP SULL IRRADIAZIONE MAMMARIA IPOFRAZIONATA Il carcinoma duttale in situ XXI CONGRESSO AIRO GENOVA 22.11.2011 INTRODUCTION Due to wide diffusion of mammography,
More information