The VR1 Antagonist Capsazepine Reverses Mechanical Hyperalgesia in Models of Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain

Transcription

1 /03/ $7.00 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS Vol. 304, No. 1 Copyright 2003 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 42010/ JPET 304:56 62, 2003 Printed in U.S.A. The VR1 Antagonist Capsazepine Reverses Mechanical Hyperalgesia in Models of Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain KATHARINE M. WALKER, 1 LASZLO URBAN, STEPHEN J. MEDHURST, 2 SADHANA PATEL, MOHANJIT PANESAR, ALYSON J. FOX, and PETER MCINTYRE Novartis Institute for Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom Received July 19, 2002; accepted September 9, 2002 ABSTRACT Vanilloid receptor type 1 (VR1) (TRPV1) is a ligand-gated ion channel expressed on sensory nerves that responds to noxious heat, protons, and chemical stimuli such as capsaicin. Herein, we have examined the activity of the VR1 antagonist capsazepine in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the rat, mouse, and guinea pig. In naïve animals, subcutaneous administration of capsazepine ( mg/kg s.c.) did not affect withdrawal thresholds to noxious thermal or mechanical stimuli. However, pretreatment with capsazepine prevented the development of mechanical hyperalgesia induced by intraplantar injection of capsaicin, with a similar potency in all three species. Capsazepine (up to 100 mg/kg s.c.) did not affect mechanical hyperalgesia in the Freund s complete adjuvant (FCA)-inflamed hind paw of the rat or mouse. Strikingly, capsazepine (3 30 The vanilloid receptor type 1 (VR1) is a pivotal molecular integrator of noxious stimuli that is expressed on somatic and autonomic primary afferent neurons. VR1 has been confirmed as a ligand-gated ion channel after its cloning from rat (Caterina et al., 1997) and human (Hayes et al., 2000; McIntyre et al., 2001). In vitro studies using recombinant VR1 have shown that, like the native vanilloid receptor, it can be activated by a variety of plant-derived compounds, including capsaicin, a pungent component from chili peppers, and resiniferatoxin (Szallasi and Blumberg, 1999), as well as noxious heat (Caterina et al., 1997), low ph (Tominaga et al., 1998), and some lipid mediators such as anandamide (Smart et al., 2000) and the lipoxygenase product 12-(S) hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (Hwang et al., 2000). The experiments in this manuscript have previously been reported in abstract form at the 2001 meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Walker K, Gentry C, Medhurst S, Patel S, Panesar M, Urban L, and McIntyre P (2001) Capsazepine shows species selective antihyperalgesic effects in models of chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Soc Neurosci Abst 31:926.7). 1 Current address: Purdue Pharma, 6 Cedar Brooke Dr., Cranbury, NJ Current address: GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Harlow, UK. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at DOI: /jpet mg/kg s.c.) produced up to 44% reversal of FCA-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in the guinea pig. Capsazepine also produced significant reversal of carageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia in the guinea pig at 30 mg/kg s.c., but was ineffective in the rat. Similarly, in the partial sciatic nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain, capsazepine was surprisingly effective in the guinea pig, producing up to 80% reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia (1 30 mg/kg s.c.) but had no effect in the rat or mouse. These data show that VR1 antagonists have antihyperalgesic activity in animal models of chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain, and illustrate species differences in the in vivo pharmacology of VR1 that correlate with differences in pharmacology previously seen in vitro. Capsazepine is a VR1 antagonist that has been shown to competitively inhibit capsaicin-mediated responses in isolated dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons (Bevan et al., 1992a) or tissues from rat (Bevan et al., 1992b; Maggi et al., 1993; Jerman et al., 2000), mouse (Urban and Dray, 1991), and guinea pig (Lou and Lundberg, 1992; Ellis and Undem, 1994; Fox et al., 1995). In vivo, capsazepine has also been shown to inhibit the nocifensive responses to capsaicin in mice and rats (Santos and Calixto, 1997), as well as capsaicin-induced bronchoconstriction or cough in the guinea pig (Satoh et al., 1993; Lalloo et al., 1995). However, early studies investigating the potential antihyperalgesic effects of capsazepine in rat models of acute and chronic pain led to the idea that capsaicin antagonists would be unlikely to be useful as analgesics (Perkins and Campbell, 1992). Nevertheless, other studies using capsazepine indicated possible species differences in the pharmacology of the vanilloid receptor. For example, although low ph solutions were shown to mimic the effect of capsaicin in several species, capsazepine inhibited low ph-evoked depolarization of sensory nerves in guinea pig airways (Lou and Lundberg, 1992; Satoh et al., 1993; Fox et al., 1995), but not in rat DRG neurons (Bevan et al., 1992b; Habelt et al., 2000). More recently, studies in our group ABBREVIATIONS: VR1, vanilloid receptor 1, TRPV1; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; FCA, Freund s complete adjuvant; ANOVA, analysis of variance; HSD, honestly significant difference. 56

2 VR1 Antagonist in Models of Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain 57 using recombinant VR1 have also demonstrated clear species selectivity in the activity of capsazepine. Thus, we have found that capsazepine inhibited responses to noxious heat and protons, as well as capsaicin, at the cloned human or the cloned guinea pig VR1 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, whereas at the rat VR1, it inhibited responses to capsaicin but not to low ph (McIntyre et al., 2001; Savidge et al., 2002). The accumulating evidence for the activation of VR1 by several stimuli, together with the demonstration of species differences in the pharmacology has prompted us to reevaluate the activity of capsazepine in animal models of pain. Herein, we examine the effects of capsazepine in guinea pig, rat, and mouse models of persistent inflammatory and chronic neuropathic pain. Materials and Methods Compounds and Administration Procedures. Capsazepine (Tocris Cookson, Bristol, UK), Diclofenac and carbamazepine (Sigma Chemical, Poole, Dorset, UK) were administered subcutaneously in 20% dimethyl sulfoxide/1% ethanol/1% Tween 80/78% saline in a volume of 0.5 ml, and morphine sulfate was administered subcutaneously in saline. Carbamazepine was administered orally in 0.5% methylcellulose. Capsaicin (Tocris Cookson) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide to a stock solution of 10 mm with dilutions in saline and administered into the plantar region of the hind paw in a volume of 10 l. Compounds where tested under blind experimental conditions. Carageenan and Freund s complete adjuvant (FCA) were obtained from Sigma Chemical. Animals. Male Wistar rats ( g), C57/BL mice (25 30 g), and Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs ( g) were housed in groups of six and had free access to food and water at all times. All experiments were carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and associated guidelines, with approval from the Novartis Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee. For comparison with compound-treated groups, animals treated with the appropriate drug vehicle were included in each experiment. The volume of administration was identical for vehicle- and compound-treated rats. Vehicle-treated rats were identical to compound-treated rats with respect to all other experimental procedures. Capsaicin-Induced Hyperalgesia. Many studies have demonstrated a dose-dependent sensitization to mechanical stimulation and the development of mechanical hyperalgesia after intradermal injections of capsaicin in human (Simone et al., 1989; LaMotte et al., 1992) and rodent pain assays (Gilchrist et al., 1996). Herein, capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was assessed in rats, mice, and guinea pigs by measuring hind paw withdrawal thresholds to an increasing pressure stimulus using an analgesymeter (7200; Ugo Basile, Comerio, Italy) with a wedge-shaped probe (area 1.75 mm 2 ). The cut-off was set at 250 g and the endpoint was taken as paw withdrawal or vocalization. In preliminary experiments, paw withdrawal thresholds were measured before and up to 30 min after an intraplantar injection of 1, 10, or 100 nmol of capsaicin into one hind paw. These experiments showed that 10 nmol of capsaicin produced a submaximal, reproducible mechanical hyperalgesia in all three species, and this dose was used for further studies. To examine the inhibition of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia, capsazepine ( mg/kg) or vehicle was administered s.c. 30 min before capsaicin injection, and withdrawal thresholds were then measured 30 min after capsaicin injection. Percentage of inhibition of development of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia was calculated according to the following formula: % inhibition (naive vehicle postcaps vehicle) (naive CPZ postcaps CPZ) (naive vehicle postcaps vehicle) 100% where CAPS refers to capsaicin administration and CPZ refers to capsazepine administration. Inflammatory Hyperalgesia. Mechanical hyperalgesia was examined in a model of inflammatory pain in the rat, mouse, and guinea pig using the paw pressure technique as described above. Paw withdrawal thresholds were measured in naive animals before an intraplantar injection of FCA (25 l; Sigma Chemical) into one hind paw. Withdrawal thresholds were then measured 24 h later, before (predose) and up to 6 h after drug or vehicle administration (postdose). The nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac was used as a positive control in all experiments. Reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia was calculated according to the following formula: postdose threshold predose threshold % reversal naive threshold predose threshold 100% Carageenan (Sigma Chemical)-induced thermal hyperalgesia was assessed in all three species using a Plantar Test Apparatus (Ugo Basile). During tests rats, mice or guinea pigs were placed individually and unrestrained in cm (length width height) Perspex boxes situated on a glass platform. Withdrawal latencies to an infrared source positioned underneath the mid-plantar hind paw were measured using a digital timer that stopped automatically upon paw withdrawal with an accuracy of 0.1 s. Withdrawal latencies were measured with a beam intensity of 22.9 for rats and mice and 50 for guinea pigs, with a cut-off of 32 s. Measurements were made twice on each paw, and the mean of the readings was used for data analysis. Latencies were determined in naive animals and then 24 h after carrageenan injection before (predose) and at 1 and 3 h after capsazepine or vehicle administration. Morphine was used as a positive control in all experiments. Neuropathic Hyperalgesia. Mechanical hyperalgesia was examined in a model of neuropathic pain induced by partial ligation of the sciatic nerve, in the rat, mouse, and guinea pig. Briefly, animals were anesthetized, the left sciatic nerve exposed at mid-thigh level through a small incision, and one-third to one-half of the nerve thickness was tightly ligated with a 7.0 silk ligature. The wound was closed with a single muscle suture and skin clips and the animals allowed to recover for 11 to 15 days postligation. Withdrawal thresholds were measured on both the ipsilateral and the contralateral hind paws before (predose) and up to 6 h after drug or vehicle administration. The antiepileptic drug carbamazepine (30 mg/kg p.o.) was used as a positive control. We have previously determined that partial nerve ligation does not affect contralateral withdrawal thresholds and that sham surgery does not affect ipsilateral thresholds. Reversal of hyperalgesia was therefore calculated according to the following formula that uses the contralateral paw as a reference rather than using additional groups of naïve or sham animals: % reversal ipsilateral threshold postdose ipsilateral threshold predose contralateral threshold predose ipsilateral threshold predose 100% Statistical Analyses. For all experiments, data analyses were performed on the untransformed paw withdrawal threshold or latency data by ANOVA with repeated measures, followed by Tukey s HSD post hoc analysis. Results Capsacin-Induced Mechanical Hyperalgesia. Intraplantar injection of capsaicin (1 100 nmol) produced a rapid, dose-dependent mechanical hyperalgesia indicated by a decrease in paw withdrawal thresholds in mice, rats, and guinea pigs, which was maximal 30 min after injection (Fig. 1A). From this experiment, a dose of 10 nmol of capsaicin was

3 58 Walker et al. Fig. 1. Effect of capsazepine against capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. A, intraplantar injection of capsaicin produced a dose-dependent mechanical hyperalgesia in rats, mice, and guinea pigs. Each point represents the mean S.E.M. paw withdrawal threshold from six animals, measured 30 min after injection of vehicle or capsaicin. B, subcutaneous administration of capsazpine 30 min before intraplantar capsaicin (10 nmol) injection inhibited the capsaicininduced hyperalgesia in rats, mice, and guinea pigs. Paw withdrawal thresholds were measured 30 min after capsaicin administration. Data are presented as percentage of inhibition of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia from six animals per group. In A and B,, P 0.05 compared with vehicle by ANOVA followed by Tukey s HSD test carried out on threshold data. selected to investigate the effects of capsazepine. Administration of capsazepine ( mg/kg s.c.) 30 min before capsaicin injection prevented development of capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in a dose-dependent manner, with similar potency in rats, mice, and guinea pigs (Fig. 1B). Inflammatory Hyperalgesia. FCA injection produced a pronounced mechanical hyperalgesia in all three species, with ipsilateral paw withdrawal thresholds in naive animals of approximately 100 g reduced to 55 to 65 g 24 h after treatment (data not shown). Capsazepine (3 30 mg/kg s.c.) produced a marked reversal of inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia in the guinea pig, with a maximal 44% reversal observed 1 h after administration (Fig. 2A). The efficacy of capsazepine was comparable with that of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac, which produced up to 48% reversal of hyperalgesia, although the effect of capsazepine was more short-lived, with a loss of antihyperalgesic activity by 3 h postadministration. In contrast, capsazepine administered at doses up to 100 mg/kg did not affect mechanical hyperalgesia in rats or mice (Fig. 2B), although diclofenac (30 mg/kg s.c.) administered as a positive control in the same experiments produced 51 and

4 VR1 Antagonist in Models of Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain 59 Fig. 2. Activity of capsazepine against FCA-induced inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia. A, administration of capsazepine or diclofenac 24 h after FCA treatment significantly reversed mechanical hyperalgesia in the guinea pig. Ipsilateral and contralateral paw withdrawal thresholds were measured before (predose) and up to 3 h after vehicle or drug administration. B, capsazepine did not affect FCA-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in the rat or mouse. Data are presented as percentage of reversal of hyperalgesia measured 1 h after capsazepine administration. In A and B, each point represents mean S.E.M. from six animals per group., P 0.05 compared with vehicle by ANOVA followed by Tukey s HSD test. 40% reversal in rats and mice, respectively (data not shown). There was no effect of capsazepine on contralateral paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimulation in any of the species, and no other overt behavioral effects, such as motor defects or sedation, were observed. Carrageenan injection into the hind paw produced thermal hyperalgesia in rats and guinea pigs (Urban et al., 2000) that was maximal 24 h after treatment. Capsazepine did not affect established inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia in rats (data not shown) but did reverse thermal hyperalgesia in the guinea pig model producing a maximal reversal of 54% at the highest dose tested (30 mg/kg), compared with a near complete reversal by a relatively high dose of morphine (10 mg/kg) (Fig. 3). Additionally, there was no significant effect on contralateral withdrawal latencies (data not shown). Neuropathic Hyperalgesia. After partial sciatic nerve ligation in rats, guinea pigs, and mice, ipsilateral paws exhibited marked mechanical hyperalgesia, with paw withdrawal thresholds averaging approximately 60 g compared with contralateral thresholds of approximately 100 g. Capsazepine (3 30 mg/kg s.c.) produced a doserelated reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia in the guinea pig. This effect was rapid in onset, with a maximal 80% reversal seen 30 min after administration, and was absent by 3 h postdose (Fig. 4A). There were no significant changes in contralateral paw withdrawal thresholds up to 3 h after capsazepine administration. The anticonvulsant carbamazepine was less efficacious than capsazepine in this experiment, producing approximately 40% reversal of hyperalgesia 3 h after administration. As observed with the inflammatory model, capsazepine did not affect ipsilateral (Fig. 4B) or contralateral (data not shown) paw withdrawal thresholds in neuropathic rats or mice at doses up to 30 mg/kg.

5 60 Walker et al. Fig. 3. Capsazpeine and morphine dose-response curves against inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia in the guinea pig. Withdrawal latencies to a noxious thermal stimulus applied to the plantar surface of the ipsilateral paw were measured in guinea pigs before (naive) and 24 h after carageenan treatment (predose), and then 1 h after vehicle or capsazepine administration. Each point represents mean S.E.M. from six animals., P 0.05 compared with vehicle. Discussion We have studied the potential role of VR1 in chronic pain conditions by examining the antihyperalgesic activity of the VR1 antagonist capsazepine in models of persistent neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Experiments were carried out in rats, mice, and guinea pigs test the species selectivity of capsazepine indicated by in vitro studies (Savidge et al., 2002). As expected, capsazepine acts as an antagonist of capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia over the same dose range in the three species tested (Fig. 1). However, the most striking finding of this study is that capsazepine produces effective reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia associated with partial sciatic nerve ligation (Fig. 4) and both mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia associated with hind paw inflammation in the guinea pig (Figs. 2 and 3). The antihyperalgesic effects of capsazepine in the guinea pig models of persistent inflammatory and neuropathic pain were produced over the same dose range that inhibited the development of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia and is, therefore, consistent with its VR1 receptor antagonist activity. Paw withdrawal thresholds from the noninjured contralateral paw were not altered after capsazepine administration, indicating that the antihyperalgesic effects of capsazepine in the guinea pig were restricted to hyperalgesia associated with inflammation or nerve injury, rather than reflecting an acute analgesic activity. The antihyperalgesic activity of capsazepine observed in guinea pigs is in marked contrast to its lack of effect in mice and rats, where no antihyperalgesic activity was observed in either the neuropathic (Fig. 4B) or inflammatory models (Fig. 2B). This is in agreement with the findings of Perkins and Campbell (1992) who found that capsazepine administered alone did not have antinociceptive activity in several models of acute and chronic pain in rats (tail-flick, hot-plate, and carrageenan-induced inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia). In contrast to these findings, other groups have reported Fig. 4. Activity of capsazepine against neuropathic mechanical hyperalgesia. A, administration of capsazepine (3, 10, and 30 mg/kg s.c.) significantly reversed mechanical hyperalgesia induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation in the guinea pig at 15, 30, and 60 min after administration. Carbamazepine also significantly reversed neuropathic mechanical hyperalgesia (30 mg/kg p.o.) 3 h after administration. Ipsilateral and contralateral paw withdrawal thresholds were measured before (predose) and 15 min to 3 h after vehicle or drug administration. B, capsazepine did not affect neuropathic hyperalgesia in the rat or mouse, whereas the control compound, carbamazepine, was effective in all species. Data are presented as percentage of reversal of hyperalgesia measured 30 min after capsazepine administration. In A and B, each point represents mean S.E.M. from six animals per group., P 0.05 compared with vehicle by ANOVA followed by Tukey s HSD test. that capsazepine prevents the early phase of formalin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia when administered intradermally in rats (Kwak et al., 1998) or mice (Santos and Calixto, 1997) and inhibits carageenan-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia in the rat (Kwak et al., 1998). However, in both these studies, extremely high concentrations of capsazepine ( 10 M) were injected directly into the paw, which may have resulted in nonspecific actions of capsazepine on other ion channels (Docherty et al., 1997; Liu and Simon, 1997). Interestingly, normal mice and mice lacking VR1 show comparable behavioral responses to formalin injection (Caterina et al., 2000), showing that VR1 activation is not essential for the formalin response. The observation of species differences in the in vivo antihyperalgesic activity of capsazepine between guinea pig and rodents is consistent with previous in vitro and in vivo findings. As discussed in the Introduction, capsazepine is a potent antagonist of capsaicin effects in a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays in rats, mice, and guinea pigs. However, there are clear differences in the activity of capsazepine against other VR1 stimuli. Thus, it blocks responses of native VR1 to

6 VR1 Antagonist in Models of Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain 61 low ph in the guinea pig airways (Satoh et al., 1993; Fox et al., 1995; Lalloo et al., 1995), as well responses of both guinea pig and human VR1 to low ph and noxious heat (McIntyre et al., 2001; Savidge et al., 2002). In contrast, capsazepine does not affect responses of rat DRG neurons to low ph (Bevan et al., 1992b) or of the recombinant rat VR1 to low ph or heat (McIntyre et al., 2001; Savidge et al., 2002). The present findings therefore support the apparent species differences in the responses of VR1 uncovered by capsazepine, and further suggest that compounds that can block capsaicin, low ph and heat stimulation of human VR1, will be antihyperalgesic in humans. Capsazepine was found to be weakly active against thermal hyperalgesia in guinea pigs (Fig. 3). This activity is in agreement with the role of VR1 in thermal hyperalgesia observed in studies of VR1 knockout mice. Thus, VR1 null mice show marked deficits to noxious thermal stimuli (Caterina et al., 2000) and a complete absence of carrageenaninduced thermal hyperalgesia (Davis et al., 2000). However, the hyperalgesic effects of heat cannot be explained by the action of VR1 alone, because mice lacking VR1 retain normal sensation of noxious heat (Caterina et al., 2000; Davis et al., 2000), suggesting the involvement of additional thermal receptors. In keeping with this hypothesis two VR1 homologues, VRL-1 (TRPV2) and TRPV3, have been reported to be insensitive to capsaicin or protons but respond to either highor low-threshold heat stimulation and neither is blocked by capsazepine (Caterina et al., 1999; Peier et al., 2002). The finding that capsazepine inhibits both thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in guinea pig models of inflammatory and chronic pain was unexpected. Although no direct link between mechanical stimulation and VR1 activation has previously been demonstrated, stimuli that activate VR1 have been shown to induce mechanical hypersensitivity. It is known that activation of the VR1 by capsaicin causes both thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in rat, primate, and human subjects (Simone et al., 1988; LaMotte et al., 1991; Torebjork et al., 1992). In fact, the mechanical hyperalgesia observed after capsaicin injection is more robust than the thermal hyperalgesia both in terms of duration of action and the size of the area of secondary hyperalgesia (Gilchrist et al., 1996). It has been shown that an intradermal capsaicin injection facilitates the responses of dorsal horn neurons due to input of low-threshold mechanoreceptors and nociceptors (LaMotte et al., 1991; Simone et al., 1991;). Thus, in inflamed tissue, local ph decreases may ultimately activate VR1, sensitizing nociceptors and low-threshold mechanoreceptors, decreasing the threshold at which mechanical stimuli result in the detection of noxious stimuli. A role for VR1 in neuropathic and inflammatory pain is supported by several recent studies indicating that VR1 is up-regulated in both inflammatory and neuropathic conditions. Peripheral inflammation has been shown to increase the sensitivity of isolated DRG to capsaicin (Nicholas et al., 1999). Moreover, VR1 can be sensitized or activated by molecules such as prostaglandin E 2 and bradykinin (Vyklicky et al., 1998), which are present in inflamed tissues and activation of PKC can either directly activate (Premkumar and Ahern, 2000) or sensitize (Vellani et al., 2001) VR1. After peripheral nerve injury VR1 protein is up-regulated in undamaged neurons and down-regulated in damaged neurons (Hudson et al., 2001). Taken together, these studies show that the expression and function of VR1 are regulated under conditions of altered noxious sensory input, which may explain why VR1 blockers can affect the sensation of noxious stimuli under pathophysiological, but not under normal conditions. It is not clear why capsazepine was more effective in blocking the mechanical hyperalgesia associated with nerve injury (Fig. 4) than inflammation (Fig. 2) in the guinea pig. Perhaps it has to do with different levels of VR1 up-regulation or sensitization in these two conditions. The ability of capsazepine to reduce mechanical hyperalgesia after partial ligation of the guinea pig sciatic nerve may be attributed in part to altered expression of VR1. Partial ligation of rat sciatic nerve results in decreased VR1 immunoreactivity in damaged (ligated) neurons, but increased VR1 immunoreactivity in undamaged neurons (Hudson et al., 2001). It is interesting that the increased VR1 immunoreactivity was present not only in C fibers in the L5 DRG but also in myelinated A fibers (Hudson et al., 2001), which provides evidence for the involvement of VR1 in mechanical sensitivity after nerve injury and supplies a rationale for why a VR1 antagonist is effective in reversing the pain behavior associated with mechanical hyperalgesia. The increased levels of VR1 may then also prime the sensory neurons to respond to other physiological consequences of nerve damage that occur postinjury, such as the release of inflammatory mediators from macrophages during Wallerian degeneration (Syriatowicz et al., 1999). The discovery of a role for VR1 in models of persistent and chronic pain may have been delayed by the fact that previous studies investigating capsazepine s effects were only carried out in rat or mouse models of chronic pain. In this study, we provide evidence that capsazepine is an effective antihyperalgesic in guinea pig models of chronic pain and that this correlates with the effectiveness of this compound in blocking VR1 activation by low ph and capsaicin (Savidge et al., 2002). In contrast, capsazepine does not reverse chronic pain in rats and mice, where it blocks only capsaicin-induced VR1 activation. These data therefore suggest that the antinociceptive effects of VR1 antagonists are predicted by their ability to block noxious heat- and proton- as well as capsaicin-induced activation of VR1 and provide evidence for a potential therapeutic benefit of VR1 antagonists in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and inflammatory pain conditions. Acknowledgments We thank Stuart Bevan for critically reading the manuscript. References Bevan S, Hothi S, Hughes G, James IF, Rang HP, Shah K, Walpole CS, and Yeats JC (1992a) Capsazepine: a competitive antagonist of the sensory neurone excitant capsaicin. Br J Pharmacol 107: Bevan S, Rang HP, and Shah K (1992b) Capsazepine does not block the protoninduced activation of rat sensory neurones. Br J Pharmacol 107:235P. Caterina MJ, Leffler A, Malmberg AB, Martin WJ, Trafton J, Petersen-Zeitz KR, Koltzenburg M, Basbaum AI, and Julius D (2000) Impaired nociception and pain in mice lacking the capsaicin receptor. Nature (Lond) 288: Caterina MJ, Rosen TA, Tominaga M, Brake AJ, and Julius D (1999) A capsaicin receptor homologue with a high threshold for noxious heat. Nature (Lond) 398: Caterina MJ, Schumacher MA, Tominaga M, Rosen TA, Levine JD, and Julius D (1997) The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature (Lond) 389: Davis JB, Gray J, Gunthorpe MJ, Hatcher JP, Davey PT, Overend P, Harries MH, Latcham J, Clapham C, Atkinson K, Hughes SA, et al. (2000) Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia. Nature (Lond) 405: Docherty RJ, Yeats JC, and Piper AS (1997) Capsazepine block of voltage-activated

7 62 Walker et al. calcium channels in adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in culture. Br J Pharmacol 121: Ellis JL and Undem BJ (1994) Inhibition by capsazepine of resiniferatoxin- and capsaicin-induced contractions of guinea-pig trachea. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 268: Fox AJ, Urban L, Barnes PJ, and Dray A (1995) Effects of capsazepine against capsaicin- and proton-evoked excitation of single airway C-fibres and vagus nerve from the guinea-pig. Neuroscience 67: Gilchrist HD, Allard BL, and Simone DA (1996) Enhanced withdrawal responses to heat and mechanical stimuli following intraplantar injection of capsaicin in rats. Pain 67: Habelt C, Kessler F, Distler C, Kress M, and Reeh PW (2000) Interactions of inflammatory mediators and low ph not influenced by capsazepine in rat cutaneous nociceptors. Neuroreport 11: Hayes P, Meadows HJ, Gunthorpe MJ, Harries MH, Duckworth DM, Cairns W, Harrison DC, Clarke CE, Ellington K, Prinjha RK, et al. (2000) Cloning and functional expression of a human orthologue of rat vanilloid receptor-1. Pain 88: Hudson LJ, Bevan S, Wotherspoon G, Gentry C, Fox A, and Winter J (2001) VR1 protein expression increases in undamaged DRG neurons after partial nerve injury. Eur J Neurosci 13: Hwang SW, Kwak JY, Lee S-L, Kang C-J, Jung J, Cho S, Min KH, Suh YG, Kim D and Oh U (2000) Direct activation of capsaicin receptors by products of lipoxygenases: endogenous capsaicin-like substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: Jerman JC, Brough SJ, Prinjha R, Harries MH, Davis JB, and Smart D (2000) Characterization using FLIPR of rat vanilloid receptor (rvr1) pharmacology. Br J Pharmacol 130: Kwak JY, Jung JY, Hwang SW, Lee WT, and Oh U (1998) A capsaicin-receptor antagonist, capsazepine, reduces inflammation-induced hyperalgesic responses in the rat: evidence for an endogenous capsaicin-like substance. Neurosci 86: Lalloo UG, Fox AJ, Belvisi MG, Chung KF, and Barnes PJ (1995) Capsazepine inhibits cough induced by capsaicin and citric acid but not by hypertonic saline in guinea-pigs. J Appl Physiol 79: LaMotte RH, Lundberg LE, and Torebjork HE (1992) Pain, hyperalgesia and activity in nociceptive C units in humans after intradermal injection of capsaicin. J Physiol (Lond) 448: LaMotte RH, Shain CN, Simone DA, and Tsai EFP (1991) Neurogenic hyperalgesia: psychophysical studies of underlying mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 66: Liu L and Simon SA (1997) Capsazepine, a vanilloid receptor antagonist, inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat trigeminal ganglia. Neurosci Lett 228: Lou YP and Lundberg JM (1992) Inhibition of low ph evoked activation of airway sensory nerves by capsazepine, a novel capsaicin-receptor antagonist. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189: Maggi CA, Bevan S, Walpole CS, Rang HP, and Giuliani S (1993) A comparison of capsazepine and ruthenium red as capsaicin antagonists in the rat isolated urinary bladder and vas deferens. Br J Pharmacol 108: McIntyre P McLatchie L, Chambers A, Phillips E, Clarke M, Savidge J, Toms C, Peacock M, Shah K, Winter J, et al. (2001) Pharmacological differences between the human and rat vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1). Br J Pharmacol 132: Nicholas RS, Winter J, Wren P, Bergmann R, and Woolf CJ (1999) Peripheral inflammation increases the capsaicin sensitivity of dorsal root ganglion neurons in a nerve growth factor-dependent manner. Neuroscience 91: Peier AM, Reeve AJ, Andersson DA, Moqrich A, Earley TJ, Hergarden AC, Story GC, Colley S, Hogenesch JB, McIntyre P, et al. (2002) A Heat-sensitive TRP channel expressed in keratinocytes. Science (Wash DC) 296: Perkins MN and Campbell EA (1992) Capsazepine reversal of the antinociceptive action of capsaicin in vivo. Br J Pharmacol 107: Premkumar LS and Ahern GP (2000) Induction of vanilloid receptor channel activity by protein kinase C. Nature (Lond) 408: Santos AR and Calixto JB (1997) Ruthenium red and capsazepine antinociceptive effect in formalin and capsaicin models of pain in mice. Neurosci Lett 235: Satoh H, Lou YP, and Lundberg JM (1993) Inhibitory effects of capsazepine and SR on citric acid-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea-pigs. Eur J Pharmacol 236: Savidge J, Davis C, Shah K, Colley S, Phillips E, Ranasinghe S, Winter J, Kotsonis P, Rang H, and McIntyre P (2002) Cloning and functional characterization of the guinea-pig vanilloid receptor 1. Neuropharmacology 43: Simone DA, Baumann TK, and LaMotte RH (1989) Dose-dependent pain and mechanical hyperalgesia in humans after intradermal injection of capsaicin. Pain 38: Simone DA, Sorkin LS, Oh U, Chung JM, Owens C, LaMotte RH, and Willis WD (1991) Neurogenic hyperalgesia: central neural correlates in response of spinothalamic tract neurons. J Neurophysiol 66: Smart D, Gunthorpe MJ, Jerman JC, Nasir S, Gray J, Muir AI, Chambers JK, Randall AD, and Davis JB (2000) The endogenous lipid anandamide is a full agonist at the human vanilloid receptor (hvr1). Br J Pharmacol 129: Syriatowicz JP, Hu D, Walker JS, and Tracey DJ (1999) Hyperalgesia due to nerve injury: role of prostaglandins. Neuroscience 94: Szallasi A and Blumberg PM (1999) Vanilloid (capsaicin) receptors and mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev 51: Tominaga M, Caterina MJ, Malmberg AB, Rosen TA, Gilbert H, Skinner K, Raumann BE, Basbaum AI, and Julius D (1998) The cloned capsaicin receptor integrates multiple pain-producing stimuli. Neuron 21: Torebjork HE, Lundberg JM, and LaMotte RH (1992) Central changes in processing of mechanoreceptive input in capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 448: Urban L, Campbell EA, Gentry C, Patel S, Chaudry N, and James I (2000) Pharmacological profile of SDZ , a novel capsaicin agonist. Pain 89: Urban L and Dray A (1991) Capsazepine, a novel capsaicin antagonist, selectively antagonises the effects of capsaicin in the mouse spinal cord in vitro. Neurosci Lett 134:9 11. Vellani V, Mapplebeck S, Moriondo A, Davis JB, and McNaughton PA (2001) Protein kinase C activation potentiates gating of the vanilloid receptor VR1 by capsaicin, protons, heat and anandamide. J Physiol (Lond) 534: Vyklicky L, Knotkova-Urbancova H, Vitaskova Z, Vlachova V, Kress M, and Reeh PW (1998) Inflammatory mediators at acidic ph activate capsaicin receptors in cultured sensory neurons from newborn rats. J Neurophysiol 79: Address correspondence to: Dr. Peter McIntyre, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Novartis Institute for Medical Sciences, 5 Gower Place, London WC1E 6BN, UK. peter.mcintyre@pharma.novartis.com