Downloaded from ijem.sbmu.ac.ir at 19: on Friday March 22nd 2019

Transcription

1 ( ) (2 ( : (3 f.amini83@gmail.com : :. (WHOQOL-BREF).. (MSPSS) (CD-RISC). :.. :. : / / : / / : / / : i i- Glasgow. : (NIDDM) (IDDM)

2 8. 4». 5 «8.. iii 2 6. iv i 0. ii iii - Wang iv- Carbunel i - Trief ii - Share

3 , SPSS-6 :. (MSPSS) i 2... (2). (4) /82 0/86 0/86. i- Zimet ( : (3 ( (4 (

4 . 2. 0/ ) 0/ (0/84 0/5 0/ / /8±6/8 2/8 3/2 62/8 82/48 8/2 5/3 (9/23= M) M) 0/26 (2/83= M) M) 2/56 (9/9=. (0/5=.(P<0/0) 4/93±/28 5/05±/52 4/42±/45 56/89±8/5 5/33±/4 6/24±/39 9/±4/33 8/94±4/5 20/56±5/09 24/6±5/22 9/43±2/34.( ). 2 0/90 0/89 0/94. 0/90 (CD-RISC) i 25. ii / r=0/64 0/ (WHOQOL-BREF) ( ) i - Conner ii - Davidson

5 , / /04 29/ /44 0/36 0/43 0/38 0/54 0/59 0/44 0/60 0/52 0/ /28 /45 /52 /4 8/5 4/33 /39 5/09 4/5 2/24 5/22 4/93 4/42 5/05 5/33 56/89 9/ 6/24 20/56 8/94 9/43 24/60-2 0/48 0/34 0/49 0/43 0/53 0/30 * 0/4 0/40 0/24 0/ /38 0/3 0/30 0/35 0/23 0/54 0/43 0/56 0/46 0/60 P<٠/٠٠٠١ P<٠/٠۵* (2 ) (r=0/59) (r=0/60) (r=0/5) (r=0/43) (r=0/58).(p<0/000) (Enter) -3 P <0/00 t 5/44 β 0/35 B /25 F 48/2 R 0/68 R2 0/46 <0/00 5/ 0/34 5/44 <0/02 2/52 0/22 9/8 <0/23 -/55-0/4-6/44

6 p<0/000 F= 2/ F= 9/58 r₂= 0/44 44 p<0/000 63/8 r ₂ = 0/45 45 p<0/000 F=.. P 46 (3 ) F= 48/2 0/46 p<0/ ) (r 2 = 0/35).(4-4 <0/000 <0/000 <0/000 <0/000 <0/000 <0/04 t /2 6/44 6/05 5/30 4/95 /99 β 0/60 0/39 0/36 0/34 0/32 0/3 B 2/4 /39 6/ /22 4/58 5/63 F 2/05 9/58 63/8 (5 ). R 0/60 0/6 0/6 R2 0/35 0/44 0/45.(5 ) -5 P <0/000 <0/522 <0/830 <0/000 <0/9 <0/99 <0/000 0/83 0/245 <0/000 <0/06 <0/08 t /2-0/64-0/22 0/98 0/03-0/026 8/90 0/26 -/65 /32 0/896 -/4 β 0/595-0/30-0/06 0/585 0/002-0/006 0/505 0/04-0/285 0/433 0/053-0/448 B 2/8-4/65-0/08 26/8 0/2-0/3 22/9 5/58-5/45 20/5 /8-8/69 F 2/05 63/5 42/22 20/5 60/03 39/84 9/24 39/80 2/03 53/60 2/8 9/29 R2 0/00 0/00 0/00 0/00 0/00 0/005 0/003 0/00 R2 0/354 0/355 0/355 0/342 0/342 0/342 0/255 0/256 0/26 0/88 0/9 0/20 R 0/595 0/596 0/596 0/585 0/585 0/585 0/505 0/506 0/5 0/433 0/436 0/448

7 , i.. 3 ii.. 2. i - Masten ii - Kaplan

8 .. ( )... :. : References. Henry D, Bernard S. Life manner with diabetes. Trans. by Panahi A. Tehran; Javid: 989; McDuffie RH, Struck L, Burshell A. Empowerment for diabetes management: integrating true self- management into the medical treatment and management of diabetes mellitus. Ochsner J 200; 3: Morowati Sharifabad MA, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad S, Baghaiani Moghadam MH, Tonekaboni NR. Relationships between locus of control and adherence to diabetes regimen in a sample of Iranians. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 200; 30: [Farsi] 4. Snoek FJ, Skinner TC. Psychological aspects of diabetes management. Medicine 2006; 34: Delavari A, Mahdavi Hazaveh A, Norozi Nejad A, Yarahmadi Sh, Taghipour M. The National Diabetes Prevention and Control Programme. 2nd ed. Tehran: Seda Publishing Center; 2003: Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Empowerment and selfmanagement of diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2004; 22: Gries FA, Alberti KG. Management of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Europe: A consensus statement. IDF Bull 98; 32: Murakado N, Inagaki M, Tasaki K, Inoue K. Development of a Resilience Scale for adult-onset type 2 diabetes patients - Evaluation of reliability and validity. Journal of Tsuruma Health Science Society Kanazawa University 203; 3: Ersoy- Kart M, Guldo O. Vulnerability to stress, perceived social support and coping styles among chronic Hemodialysis patient. Dial Transplant 2005; 34: Heydari S, Salahshourian Fard A, Rafiee F, Hoseini F. Correlation of perceived social support from different supportive sources and the size of social network with

9 , quality of life in cancer patients. J Kashan Univ Med Sic 2009; 22: 8-8. [Farsi]. Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Britton KD, Weinstock RS. The relationship between marital quality and adherence to the diabetes care regimen. Ann Behav Med 2004; 2: Available from: URL: 2. Share H, Soltani E, Ghasemi, A. The survey percieved social support in predicting quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. Zahedan Univ Med Sci J 20; 4: [Farsi] 3. Souri A, Ashoori J. The relationship between perceived social support, psychological hardiness and family communication patterns with quality of life among patients with type II diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Nursing 205; 3: [Farsi] 4. Conner KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: The Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression Anxiety 2003; 8: American Psychological Association 2008: http// apahelpcenter. org/ feat ured topics/. The American psychological Association, The Road to Resilience onlyne. http//helping.apa.org/resilience 90: 9, Wang RH, Lee YJ, Shin SHJ. The Paths of Social Support, Resilience, and Emotional Distress on Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. 26TH International Nursing Research Congress. 25 July Ong AD, Edwards L, Bergeman CS. Hope as a source of resilience in later adulthood. Pers Individ Dif 2006; 4: Lakzaei H, Mansuri A, Bamari F, Khammari M, Nouri Sanchouli H. An Investigation of the Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Resilience in Diabetic Patients Referring to Ali Asghar Clinic of Zahedan. J Diabetes Nurs 205; 2: 6-24.[Farsi] 9. Heidarzade M, Zaman Zade V, Lak dizji C. The analysis of quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Nursing and midwifery Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2006; : [Farsi] 20. Goldney R, Phillips P, Fisher L, Wilson D. Diaetes, Depression, and Quality of Life. Diabetes Care 2004; 2: Sedaghati Kasbakhi M, Ehsani M, Ghanbari A. The comparison between the quality of life in diabetes patients having type 2 with non- diabetic people. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences 2003; 9: [Farsi] 22. Tovbin D, Gidron Y, Granovsky R, Schnieder A. Relative importance and interrelation between psychosocial factors and individualized quality of life of Hemodialysis patients. Qual Life Res 2003; 2: 09-. Available from: URL: Rambod M, Rafii F. Relationship between perceived social support and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Iran J Nurs Res 2009; 3: [Farsi]. Available from: URL: Zimet G, Dahlem N, Zimet S, Farley G. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Person Asses 988; 52: Available from: URL: Salimi A, Jokar B, Nikpoor R. Internet and comm.- unication: Perceived social support and loneliness as antecedent variables. Psychol Studies 2009; 5: [Farsi] 26. Besharat MA, Abbaspour T. Relationship between metacognitive strategies and creativity with resilience in students. New Finding Psychology 20; [Farsi] 2. WHOQOL group. WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration and scoring, Field Trial version, World Health Organization, Geneva 996. Available from: URL: Nedjat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie Naieni K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R. The world health organization quality of life (WHOQOLBREF) questionnaire: Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. J Sch Public Health Inst Public health Res 2006; 4: -2. [Farsi] 29. Al-Arabi S. Social support, coping methods and quality of life in Hemodialysis patient. PHD Dissertation, Galveston, University of Texas Masten AS. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. Am Psychol 200; 56: Available from: URL: 3. Kaplan HB. Toward the understanding of resilience: Acritical review of definitions and models, in MD Glantz & JL Johonson (eds), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations, Plenum, NewYork 2002.

10 395/Iranian Journal of Endocrinology abd Metabolism Vol 8 No.5 December-January 20 Original Article The Role of Perceived Social Support and Resilience in Predicting the Quality of Life in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Aghayousefi A, Amini F 2, Dehestani M 2, Salary S 3 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Qom, Iran, 2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran, 3 Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, I.R. Iran f.amini83@gmail.com Received: 22/06/206 Accepted: 2/2/206 Abstract Introduction: The purpose of present study was to evaluate the role of perceived social support and resilience in predicting quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes in Lamerd, Iran. Materials and Methods: The population of this study included all patients with type 2 diabetes who had documented information in the SedigheTahere Health Services Center of Lamerd. From among these patients, 234 were selected by the simple random sampling method. Data collection tools used in this study were the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Resilience Scale (RS) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF). This study was conducted based on the descriptive correlation method. Pearson correlation and regression analysis were used to analyze data. Results: Results of Regression analysis suggested that resilience, the support of friends and individual support predicted 46 percent of the variance in quality of life, demonstrating there was a positive and significant relationship between dimension perceived social support and resilience with quality of life. Conclusion: Considering the fact that support of friends and individual support and resilience are meaningful predictors of quality of life, promotion and enhancement of such factors can positively influence the quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. Keywords: Type 2 diabetes, Quality of life, Perceived social support, Resilience