RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

Transcription

1 EPIDEMIOLOGY Retinal Vein Occlusion and Traditional Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis Paul R. A. O Mahoney; David T. Wong, MD, FRCSC; Joel G. Ray, MD, MSc, FRCPC Objective: To determine whether retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is related to systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Methods: We systematically retrieved all studies published between January 1985 and July 2007 that compared cases with any form of RVO, including central and branch RVO, with controls. We generated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and estimates of the populationattributable risk percentages for systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Results: Of 21 studies, including 2916 cases and controls, both hypertension (OR, 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], ) and hyperlipidemia (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, ) were significantly associated with any form of RVO; the association was less pronounced for diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, ). Similar results were found in cases with central RVO and branch RVO. The percentage of cases with any form of RVO attributed to hypertension was 47.9% (95% CI, 31.2%-63.1%), to diabetes mellitus was 4.9% (95% CI, 0.8%-11.5%), and to hyperlipidemia was 20.1% (95% CI, 5.9%-43.8%). Conclusions: Hypertension and hyperlipidemia are common risk factors for RVO in adults, and diabetes mellitus is less so. It remains to be determined whether lowering blood pressure and/or serum lipid levels can improve visual acuity or the complications of RVO. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(5): Author Affiliations: School of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin (Mr O Mahoney); and Department of Ophthalmology (Dr Wong), and Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Endocrinology and Metabolism, and Departments of Medicine and Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Dr Ray), St Michael s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. RETIL VEIN OCCLUSION (RVO) is the second most common form of retinal vascular disease causing vision loss. 1 Branch RVO (BRVO) may result from compression of a branch retinal vein by an adjacent retinal artery, typically at a common crossing point. Central RVO (CRVO) typically arises when the central retinal vein is occluded posterior to or within the lamina cribrosa. 1,2 Retinal hemorrhage and edema may complicate either form of RVO, resulting in partial or complete loss of vision. Neovascularization of the iris, anterior chamber angle, and retina in CRVO and BRVO may be a further complication. 1,2 Although thrombophilia defects are often associated with lower limb deep vein CME available online at and questions on page 607 thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, they are frequently absent in persons with RVO. 3 In a recent meta-analysis by Janssen et al, only hyperhomocysteinemia and the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies were more prevalent in persons with RVO. 3 In their conclusions, the authors questioned whether conventional systemic risk factors for atherosclerosis play a dominant role in the pathogenesis of RVO. We undertook a meta-analysis to compare 3 common risk factors for atherosclerosis hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia in persons with and without RVO. METHODS LITERATURE SEARCH Two investigators (P.R.A.O. and J.G.R.) independently searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for articles published from January 1985 to July The following search expression was used: (retinal vein) AND (thrombosis OR occlusion OR obstruction) AND (hypertension OR diabetes mellitus OR dyslipidemia OR hyperlipidemia OR lipids OR cholesterol). All searches were limited to English language and human subject studies. The abstract of each article was read and determined to be eligible according to the following criteria: (1) the study included at least 10 cases with any form of RVO; (2) a control group without RVO was included; and (3) the number of cases and controls with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and/or hyperlipidemia was also reported in the study. Full-text 692

2 articles deemed eligible were reviewed to ensure that they met the inclusion criteria. DATA ABSTRACTION Study design and patient characteristics, methods used to define atherosclerosis risk factors, and the prevalence of risk factors in cases and controls were put into standardized tables. Hemiretinal vein occlusion was considered to be a variant of CRVO, in keeping with the studies included herein and the recommendations of others. 2,4 If there was any uncertainty about a study s data, the corresponding author was contacted by . STATISTICAL ALYSIS Among persons with and without RVO, a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to derive a pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each atherosclerosis risk factor. 5 This was separately performed for any type of RVO, CRVO, and BRVO. This random-effects method weights the relative contribution of each study to a pooled event rate based on the variance both within and among studies. 5 Statistical heterogeneity for the pooled event rate was determined using the Breslow-Day method, with P.05 representing significant heterogeneity. 6 For studies of any type of RVO, CRVO, and BRVO, an odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were also calculated for each atherosclerosis risk factor, comparing persons with vs those without RVO. Derivation of a pooled OR and 95% CI, along with testing for statistical heterogeneity, were performed with the same meta-analytical methods, 5,6 using Meta-Analyst statistical software. 7 For any type of RVO, as well as CRVO and BRVO, the population-attributable risk percentage (PAR%; the percentage attributed to each atherosclerosis risk factor [ie, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia]) was calculated for each atherosclerosis risk factor using the following equation: PAR%= {(Atherosclerosis Risk Factor Rate Among Controls) (Pooled OR 1)/ [(Atherosclerosis Risk Factor Rate Among Controls) (Pooled OR 1) 1]} 100 A 95% CI for the PAR% was also derived with this above equation, using the upper and lower 95% CI for the pooled OR for each risk factor, as well as the upper and lower 95% CI for the pooled rate among unaffected controls. RESULTS STUDY AND PARTICIPANT CHARACTERISTICS A total of 295 citations were initially found in PubMed and 215 in EMBASE. Of these, 20 articles comprising 21 studies met the inclusion criteria (Table 1) Nine of 21 studies were from the United States, 3 from Italy, 3 from Turkey, and 1 each from Armenia, Australia, Austria, Iran, Israel, and Japan. All but 4 were case-control studies: 2 were cross-sectional studies 10,23 and 2 were cohort studies. 27 Of 2916 people with RVO, 1398 (47.9%) had CRVO and 1518 (52.1%) had BRVO (Table 1). Controls typically were recruited from ophthalmology practices at the same center or from the same region as the RVO cases. Most cases and controls were aged 60 to 65 years. Two studies used the same control group. 13,14 ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK FACTORS AND RVO All studies assessed cases with RVO for the presence of hypertension, 20 assessed for diabetes mellitus, and 9 for hyperlipidemia (Table 2). The methods used to define the presence of hypertension varied across studies. In most studies, hypertension was defined as a documented elevated blood pressure measurement, although a history of hypertension was also used. In addition, the definitions of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia also varied among studies (Table 2). SYSTEMIC HYPERTENSION Among 2916 persons with any form of RVO, the pooled prevalence of systemic hypertension was 63.6% (95% CI, 58.9%-68.1%) compared with 36.2% (95% CI, 30.7%- 42.2%) among unaffected controls, which was equivalent to a pooled OR of 3.5 (95% CI, ) (Table 3 and Figure, A). Although most studies described a positive association between hypertension and RVO (Figure, A), a significant degree of heterogeneity was present for the pooled estimates. Of 21 studies, 1 found a higher rate of hypertension among controls, but the difference was not significant, and the method used to define hypertension was not described. 12 The PAR% for hypertension among persons with any form of RVO was 47.9% (95% CI, 31.2%-63.1%) (Table 3). A significant association was seen between hypertension and both CRVO (pooled OR, 3.8; 95% CI, ) (Table 4) and BRVO (pooled OR, 3.0; 95% CI, ) (Table 5). DIABETES MELLITUS Diabetes mellitus was slightly more prevalent among 2877 cases with any form of RVO (14.6%; 95% CI, 12.3%- 17.3%) than the unaffected controls (11.1%, 95% CI, 9.2%-13.4%) (Table 3 and Figure, B). Although the pooled OR was significant (1.5; 95% CI, ), the risk of RVO was not consistently higher in all studies, with opposing results in 4 studies. 15,22,24,25 The PAR% for diabetes mellitus among persons with any form of RVO was 4.9% (95% CI, 0.8%-11.5%) (Table 3). Although CRVO (pooled OR, 2.0; 95% CI, ) (Table 4) was significantly associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus, BRVO (pooled OR, 1.1; 95% CI, ) was not (Table 5). HYPERLIPIDEMIA Hyperlipidemia was not defined in a consistent manner across studies, and in some studies, no definition was provided (Table 2). 16,18,20 For any form of RVO, hyperlipidemia was more than twice as common among the 1393 cases (35.1%; 95% CI, 22.0%-51.0%) than the 2642 controls (16.7%; 95% CI, 9.1%-28.6%), equivalent to a pooled OR of 2.5 (95% CI, ) (Table 3 and Figure, C). These pooled estimates were statistically heterogeneous, however. Similar significant risk estimates were seen for persons with CRVO (Table 4) and BRVO (Table 5). The PAR% for hyperlipidemia among persons with any form of RVO was 20.1% (95% CI, 5.9%-43.8%) (Table 3). 693

3 Table 1. Study and Participant Characteristics Cases With RVO Controls Study Design Study Setting; Period Johnston et al, Case control Single US eye clinic; Appiah and Greenidge, Elman et al, Case control Longitudinal cross-sectional Single US medical center; Single US medical center; Rath et al, Case control Single US medical center; Sekimoto et al, Case control Single Japanese clinic; Sperduto et al, Case control Five US clinical centers; Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group, Simons and Brucker, Case control Case control Five US clinical centers; Single US eye clinic; before 1997 Salomon et al, Case control Israeli eye clinic and ophthalmology department; 1996 Marcucci et al, Case control Single Italian medical center; Kadayifçilar et al, Shahsuvaryan and Total No. With Central RVO (%) No. With Branch RVO (%) Mean Age, y Selection Method (100) 70.0 Consecutive age-matched patients self- or physician-referred to the same clinic without branch RVO (44) 38 (56) 62.0 Randomly selected age-, sex-, and race-matched patients 45 y who visited a medical center for a general eye examination (100) Age-, sex-, and race-matched controls selected from patients admitted for cataract extraction at the same medical center (52) a 42 (48) 68.4 Patients without RVO, randomly selected from 2 general ophthalmologists records (100) 61.6 Consecutive patients visiting the same clinic within the same time period, and with an ophthalmologic diagnosis other than branch RVO (100) 65.0 Residents within the local area of the clinic, aged y, and free of any ocular disease (100) Residents within the local area of the clinic aged y and free of any ocular disease (100) 67.2 Age- and sex-matched patients who had undergone cataract extraction at the same eye clinic (53) a 48 (47) 64.6 Clinic patients with an ophthalmologic diagnosis other than RVO (100) Healthy age- and sex-matched volunteers, excluding persons with a history of cardiovascular disease Case control Turkey; (41) a 32 (59) 59.7 Age- and sex-matched controls of the same referral area who applied for correction of refractive errors, presbyopia, or cataracts Case control Single Armenian ophthalmologic center; Yaghoubi et al, Case control Single Iranian eye clinic; 2002 Yildirim et al, Prospective case control Single Turkish university; Wegeretal, Case control Single Austrian ophthalmology department; Wong et al, Population-based cross-sectional Several US states; Gumus et al, Case control Single Turkish university; Pinna et al, Case control Single Italian university; Leoncini et al, Case control Single Italian university; Cugati et al, Cugati et al, Population-based cohort Population-based cohort Abbreviation: RVO, retinal vein occlusion. a Includes persons with hemiretinal vein occlusion. Beaver Dam, Wisconsin; Blue Mountains region, Australia; (100) Absence of any retinal vascular disease Mean Age, y (42) 14 (58) 61.1 Patients attending the same eye clinic without signs of retinal vascular occlusion, glaucoma, uveitis, or intraocular surgery/trauma (33) a 22 (67) 61.0 Age- and sex-matched 58.0 participants without a history of RVO (100) 67.0 Age- and sex-matched patients 67.1 referred to an ophthalmology department for reasons other than branch RVO; patients with a history of RVO or vasculitis were also excluded 39 6 (15) a 33 (85) 63.0 Patients without RVO based on 63.0 retinal photographs (32) 56 (68) 57.7 Healthy age- and sex-matched 57.4 patients with refractive errors, presbyopia, or cataracts (43) 254 (57) 65.0 Age- and sex-matched patients 65.0 undergoing cataract surgery with no history of RVO (47) 20 (53) 67.3 Age-matched patients without a 63.3 history of thromboembolic diseases, glaucoma, or malignancy 38 7 (18) a 31 (82) 70.5 Patients without RVO (31) a 40 (69) 74.8 Patients without RVO

4 Table 2. Methods Used to Define Atherosclerosis Risk Factors Johnston et al, Appiah and Greenidge, Atherosclerosis Risk Factor Systemic Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Hyperlipidemia Current BP 140/90 mm Hg, history of hypertension managed by a physician, or currently treated with SBP 160 mm Hg and DBP 95 mm Hg, or history of hypertension and currently treated with History of DM controlled by diet, oral agent, or insulin History of DM and currently treated for DM, or had abnormal 4-h glucose tolerance test Hypercholesterolemia, fasting serum cholesterol level 250 mg/dl; hypertriglyceridemia, fasting serum triglycerides level 177 mg/dl; hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia Elman et al, History of hypertension requiring treatment, or a physician indicated patient had a history at time of central RVO diagnosis History of being treated for DM using either insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent Rath et al, History of hypertension and currently History of being treated for DM using treated with antihypertensive insulin, sulfonylurea, and/or diet medication Sekimoto et al, Assessed, but not defined; each patient Assessed, but not defined; each patient was evaluated at a cardiovascular was evaluated at a diabetes clinic clinic Sperduto et al, SBP 160 mm Hg or DBP 90 Assessed, but not defined Serum triglycerides level 80th mm Hg, or currently treated with percentile concentration among controls (ie, 171 mg/dl) Eye Disease Case-Control SBP 160 mm Hg or DBP 90 Assessed, but not defined mm Hg, or currently treated with Simons and Brucker, 15 History of hypertension, also treated History of DM controlled by diet, oral 1997 by a physician agent, or insulin Salomon et al, Assessed, but not defined Assessed, but not defined Assessed, but not defined Marcucci et al, SBP 140 mm Hg or DBP 90 Assessed, but not defined Fasting total plasma cholesterol level mm Hg, or currently treated with 200 mg/dl, or currently treated with lipid-lowering medication Kadayifçilar et al, Assessed, but not defined Assessed, but not defined Assessed, but not defined; only hypercholesterolemia considered Shahsuvaryan and SBP 160 mm Hg or DBP 90 mm Hg, or currently treated with Blood glucose 110 mg/dl, or taking insulin or hypoglycemic medications Yaghoubi et al, Assessed, but not defined Assessed, but not defined Assessed, but not defined Yildirim et al, BP 140/90 mm Hg, or currently Assessed, but not defined treated with antihypertensive medication Weger et al, SBP 140 mm Hg, DBP 90 mm Hg, Currently treated for type 1 or type 2 DM Fasting plasma cholesterol level and/or currently treated with 200 mg/dl, and/or currently treated with lipid-lowering Wong et al, SBP 140 mm Hg, DBP 90 mm Hg, currently treated with, and/or self-reported history of hypertension Gumus et al, Assessed, but not defined Assessed, but not defined Pinna et al, SBP 140 mm Hg or DBP 90 mm Hg, or currently treated with Leoncini et al, Cugati et al, BP 140/90 mm Hg, or currently treated with antihypertensive medication SBP 140 mm Hg, DBP 90 mm Hg, or current self-reported use of Currently treated for type 1 or type 2 DM, or had a fasting plasma glucose level 126 mg/dl and/or plasma glucose level 200 mg/dl 2 h after 75-g oral glucose load Currently treated for type 1 or type 2 DM History of DM or hyperglycemia, glycosylated hemoglobin concentration 2 SDs above normal, or random blood glucose level 200 mg/dl (BDES) or 126 mg/dl (BMES) medication Fasting plasma cholesterol level 200 mg/dl, or currently treated with lipid-lowering medication Fasting plasma cholesterol 200 mg/dl, or currently treated with lipid-lowering medication Abbreviations: BDES, Beaver Dam Eye Study; BMES, Blue Mountains Eye Study; BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure;, not assessed; RVO, retinal vein occlusion; SBP, systolic blood pressure. Conversion factors: to convert cholesterol to millimoles per liter, multiply by ; to convert glucose to millimoles per liter, multiply by ; to convert triglycerides to millimoles per liter, multiply by

5 Table 3. Prevalence of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors and Any Form of RVO No. With the Risk Factor/Total (%) Systemic Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus Hyperlipidemia RVO Cases Controls RVO Cases Controls RVO Cases Controls Johnston et al, /225 (60) 47/100 (47) 47/225 (21) 14/100 (14) Appiah and Greenidge, 9 45/68 (66) 9/50 (18) 11/68 (16) 6/50 (12) 7/68 (10) 6/50 (12) 1987 Elman et al, /191 (45) 65/191 (34) 26/191 (14) 25/191 (13) Rath et al, /87 (67) 29/85 (34) 24/87 (28) 15/85 (18) Sekimoto et al, /63 (65) 36/50 (72) 19/63 (30) 12/50 (24) Sperduto et al, /270 (74) 506/1139 (44) 40/270 (15) 102/1142 (9) 69/265 (26) 221/1114 (20) Eye Disease Case-Control 167/257 (65) 506/1139 (44) 43/258 (17) 102/1142 (9) Simons and Brucker, /36 (53) 15/36 (42) 5/36 (14) 10/36 (28) Salomon et al, /102 (49) 31/105 (30) 17/102 (17) 16/105 (15) 25/102 (25) 16/105 (15) Marcucci et al, /100 (48) 6/100 (6) 12/100 (12) 0/100 37/100 (37) 8/100 (8) Kadayifçilar et al, /54 (61) 6/19 (32) 6/54 (11) 2/19 (11) 30/54 (56) 5/19 (26) Shahsuvaryan and 241/408 (59) 45/566 (8) 34/408 (8) 3/566 (1) Yaghoubi et al, /24 (58) 3/24 (13) 4/24 (17) 1/24 (4) 6/24 (25) 0/24 Yildirim et al, /33 (57) 10/25 (40) 5/33 (15) 3/25 (12) Weger et al, /294 (73) 162/294 (55) 28/294 (10) 41/294 (14) 232/294 (79) 178/294 (61) Wong et al, /39 (74) 6761/15427 (44) Gumus et al, /82 (71) 24/78 (31) 6/82 (7) 7/78 (9) Pinna et al, /448 (56) 397/896 (44) 60/448 (13) 134/896 (15) 160/448 (36) 146/896 (16) Leoncini et al, /38 (61) 3/40 (8) 4/38 (11) 0/40 12/38 (32) 0/40 Cugati et al, (BDES) 34/38 (90) 2402/4784 (50) 7/38 (18) 426/4784 (9) Cugati et al, (BMES) 52/58 (90) 2487/3498 (71) 5/58 (9) 269/3498 (8) Pooled rate (95% CI), % 63.6 ( ) a 36.2 ( ) a 14.6 ( ) a 11.1 ( ) a 35.1 ( ) a 16.7 ( ) a Pooled odds ratio (95% CI) 3.5 ( ) a 1.5 ( ) a 2.5 ( ) a PAR% (95% CI) 47.9 ( ) 4.9 ( ) 20.1 ( ) Abbreviations: BDES, Beaver Dam Eye Study; BMES, Blue Mountains Eye Study; CI, confidence interval;, not assessed; PAR%, population-attributable risk percentage; RVO, retinal vein occlusion. a Significant heterogeneity: P.05. COMMENT In this meta-analysis of 21 observational studies including 2915 persons with RVO, we observed a more than 3.5-times higher risk of RVO in cases with systemic hypertension. About a 2.5-times higher risk of RVO was associated with hyperlipidemia, but there was only a modest correlation between RVO and the presence of diabetes mellitus. LIMITATIONS The definitions of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia varied both within and among studies (Table 2). This was partly due to the changing diagnostic criteria for each condition during the 2 decades of study and the lack of formal measurements from close to the time of RVO onset. In fact, the time of onset of RVO symptoms was rarely considered in relation to each atherosclerosis risk factor. The time between RVO onset and case enrollment varied from weeks 16,24 to 2 years. 17 Some studies did not define a given atherosclerosis risk factor, 12,16,18,20,24 and in most studies, the severity of hypertension or hyperlipidemia was not reported. Although many studies matched controls to cases on age and sex, they did not control for other relevant factors, such as body mass index, renal function, smoking, or intraocular pressure. The latter is important because ocular hypertension, which is also associated with systemic hypertension, is a probable risk factor for RVO. 11,14,19 Previously, some studies have distinguished between ischemic and nonischemic RVO, 14 which was not a consideration in most studies included in this meta-analysis. Although combining hemiretinal vein occlusion with CRVO might be questioned, they share similar anatomical features and pathogenesis. 2,4 Finally, we did not attempt to include unpublished or non English language studies. Taken together, these points may limit the external validity of our risk estimates, especially in the modern era of bettercontrolled hypertension and dyslipidemia. SOURCES OF HETEROGENEITY Statistical heterogeneity was present for most of the pooled risk estimates. In addition to study differences, including the definition of each risk factor and the interval between RVO onset and its assessment, the method of selecting controls varied largely among studies. Some studies were designed to assess for risk factors other than hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia as their main exposure of interest. 12,15-18,20-22,24-26 This likely manifested as a high degree of variability in the rate of hypertension among controls vs participants with any form of 696

6 RVO (Table 3), resulting in a high degree of variation in the associated pooled OR (Figure, A). In some studies, the OR may have been further inflated by the biased selection of exceptionally healthy controls, whose reported rates of hypertension and diabetes mellitus were less than 10% and 1%, respectively. 17,19,26 Although a significant degree of statistical heterogeneity was found in this meta-analysis, there was a consistently positive association across studies between RVO and both hypertension and hyperlipidemia (Figure, A and C), suggesting that these findings are robust. IMPLICATIONS This meta-analysis explored whether RVO may be caused by traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis. 3 The pronounced PAR% for hypertension (nearly 50%), hyperlipidemia (20%), and diabetes mellitus (5%) in persons with RVO, if causal, would mean that treatment of these diseases might be important in the primary and secondary prevention of RVO. This would be in addition to the prevention of heart disease and stroke, for which there is high-quality evidence. 28,29 Accordingly, we recommend that an assessment of blood pressure and both fasting lipid and glucose levels be routinely performed in adults with any form of RVO. At the same time, evidence is lacking about whether lowering blood pressure, serum lipid levels, and/or blood glucose levels can improve visual acuity or the complications of RVO. Hence, a sensible approach is to gradually normalize these measures in accordance with current guidelines, 28,29 with the main goal being the prevention of cardiovascular and renal disease. FUTURE RESEARCH Further observational studies should use standardized measurements and definitions of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, each assessed near the time of RVO diagnosis. As was mentioned elsewhere, 2 data are needed to determine whether excessive lowering of blood pressure in persons with RVO may have negative effects during the acute phase of the disease, and whether it can reduce the long-term risk of neovascular glaucoma or RVO recurrence. There is a paucity of level 1 evidence regarding the treatment of CRVO and BRVO, including the use of systemic therapy. 30,31 Moreover, some conventional antithrombotic medications do not appear to be protective against RVO and may be harmful. For example, in a recently published case-control study, Koizumi et al found that use of aspirin (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, ) and warfarin (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, ) was significantly associated with a higher risk of CRVO. 32 In an effort to better define the role of lipid reduction in persons with RVO, we have embarked on the Atorvastatin Toronto Retinal Vein Occlusion (ATORVO) study (Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NRA ). The ATORVO study is an investigator-initiated randomized, double-masked clinical trial comparing 80 mg of atorvastatin calcium once a day to placebo in 180 persons with RVO. Changes in A Johnston et al, Appiah and Greenidge, Elman et al, Rath et al, Sekimoto et al, Sperduto et al, Eye Disease Case-Control Simons and Brucker, Salomon et al, Marcucci et al, Kadayifçilar et al, Shahsuvaryan and Yaghoubi et al, Yildirimetal, Weger et al, Wong et al, Gumus et al, Pinna et al, Leoncini et al, Cugati et al, (BDES) Cugati et al, (BMES) Pooled OR (95% CI) B OR (95% CI) Johnston et al, Appiah and Greenidge, Elman et al, Rath et al, Sekimoto et al, Sperduto et al, Eye Disease Case-Control Simons and Brucker, Salomon et al, Marcucci et al, Kadayifçilar et al, Shahsuvaryan and Yaghoubi et al, Yildirim et al, Weger et al, Gumus et al, Pinna et al, Leoncini et al, Cugati et al, (BDES) Cugati et al, (BMES) Pooled OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) C Appiah and Greenidge, Sperduto et al, Salomon et al, Marcucci et al, Kadayifçilar et al, Yaghoubi et al, Weger et al, Pinna et al, Leoncini et al, Pooled OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) Figure. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for any form of retinal vein occlusion in association with hypertension (A), diabetes mellitus (B), and hyperlipidemia (C). BDES indicates Beaver Dam Eye Study; and BMES, Blue Mountains Eye Study. 697

7 Table 4. Prevalence of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors and CRVO No. With the Risk Factor/Total (%) Systemic Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus Hyperlipidemia CRVO Cases Controls CRVO Cases Controls CRVO Cases Controls Appiah and Greenidge, 9 17/30 (57) 9/50 (18) 5/30 (17) 6/50 (12) 3/30 (10) 6/50 (12) 1987 Elman et al, /191 (45) 65/191 (34) 26/191 (14) 25/191 (13) Rath et al, /45 (64) 29/85 (34) 15/45 (33) 15/85 (18) Eye Disease Case-Control 167/257 (65) 506/1139 (44) 43/258 (17) 102/1142 (9) Marcucci et al, /100 (48) 6/100 (6) 12/100 (12) 0/100 37/100 (37) 8/100 (8) Kadayifçilar et al, /22 (36) 6/19 (32) 1/22 (5) 2/19 (11) 8/22 (36) 5/19 (26) Shahsuvaryan and 241/408 (59) 45/566 (8) 34/408 (8) 3/566 (1) Yaghoubi et al, /10 (40) 3/24 (13) 2/10 (20) 1/24 (4) 2/10 (20) 0/24 Gumus et al, /26 (65) 24/78 (31) 2/26 (8) 7/78 (9) Pinna et al, /194 (51) 397/896 (44) 29/194 (15) 134/896 (15) 70/194 (36) 146/896 (16) Pooled rate (95% CI), % 54.5 ( ) a 24.3 ( ) a 14.4 ( ) a 8.9 ( ) a 32.0 ( ) a 13.5 ( ) a Pooled odds ratio 3.8 ( ) a 2.0 ( ) a 2.9 ( ) (95% CI) Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRVO, central retinal vein occlusion;, not assessed. a Significant heterogeneity: P.05. Table 5. Prevalence of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors and BRVO No. With the Risk Factor/Total (%) Systemic Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus Hyperlipidemia BRVO Cases Controls BRVO Cases Controls BRVO Cases Controls Johnston et al, /225 (60) 47/100 (47) 47/225 (21) 14/100 (14) Appiah and Greenidge, 9 28/38 (74) 9/50 (18) 6/38 (16) 6/50 (12) 4/38 (11) 6/50 (12) 1987 Elman et al, /42 (67) 29/85 (34) 10/42 (24) 15/85 (18) Rath et al, /63 (65) 36/50 (72) 19/63 (30) 12/50 (24) Sekimoto et al, /270 (74) 506/1139 (44) 40/270 (15) 102/1142 (9) 69/265 (26) 221/1114 (20) Sperduto et al, /36 (53) 15/36 (42) 5/36 (14) 10/36 (28) Eye Disease Case-Control 25/32 (78) 6/19 (32) 5/32 (16) 2/19 (11) 22/32 (69) 5/19 (26) Simons and Brucker, 15 10/14 (71) 3/24 (13) 2/14 (14) 1/24 (4) 4/14 (29) 0/ Salomon et al, /294 (73) 162/294 (55) 28/294 (10) 41/294 (14) 232/294 (79) 178/294 (61) Marcucci et al, /56 (73) 24/78 (31) 4/56 (7) 7/78 (9) Kadayifçilar et al, /254 (60) 397/896 (44) 31/254 (12) 134/896 (15) 90/254 (35) 146/896 (16) Pooled rate (95% CI), % 67.7 ( ) a 41.7 ( ) a 15.7 ( ) a 14.1 ( ) a 40.4 ( ) a 21.9 ( ) a Pooled odds ratio 3.0 ( ) a 1.1 ( ) a 2.3 ( ) a (95% CI) Abbreviations: BRVO, branch retinal vein occlusion; CI, confidence interval;, not assessed. a Significant heterogeneity: P.05. visual acuity and the presence of secondary complications of RVO will be evaluated 24 weeks after randomization (study protocol available by ing the corresponding author). CONCLUSIONS Those who treat patients with systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia should consider that each poses a risk not only to cardiovascular health but also to ocular health. 33 The current findings suggest that a major proportion of RVO cases are caused by highly prevalent atherosclerosis risk factors that can be measured in a routine clinical setting. Submitted for Publication: September 6, 2007; final revision received October 19, 2007; accepted October 30, Correspondence: Joel G. Ray, MD, MSc, FRCPC, DepartmentofMedicine, StMichael shospital, 30BondSt, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada (rayj@smh.toronto.on.ca). Author Contributions: Mr O Mahoney and Dr Ray had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. 698

8 Financial Disclosure: None reported. Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St Michael s Hospital, and a Canadian Institutes for Health Research New Investigator Award (Dr Ray). The ATORVO Study is funded by Pfizer Canada through an investigatorinitiated grant. Role of the Sponsor: The sponsors had no involvement in or control over the design and conduct of the study; the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; the preparation of the data; or the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. REFERENCES 1. Prisco D, Marcucci R. Retinal vein thrombosis: risk factors, pathogenesis and therapeutic approach. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2002;32(5-6): Hayreh SS. Prevalent misconceptions about acute retinal vascular occlusive disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24(4): Janssen MC, den Heijer M, Cruysberg JR, et al. Retinal vein occlusion: a form of venous thrombosis or a complication of atherosclerosis? Thromb Haemost. 2005; 93(6): Hayreh SS, Hayreh MS. Hemi-central retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, clinical features, and natural history. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(9): DerSimonian R, Laird N. Metaanalysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3): Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Vol 1. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; Lau J. Meta-Analyst [computer program]. Boston, MA: Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts New England Medical Center; Johnston RL, Brucker AJ, Steinmann W, Hoffman ME, Holmes JE. Risk factors of branch retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(12): Appiah AP, Greenidge KC, et al. Factors associated with retinal-vein occlusion in Hispanics. Ann Ophthalmol. 1987;(8): Elman MJ, Bhatt AK, Quinlan PM, et al. The risk for systemic vascular diseases and mortality in patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1990; 97(11): Rath EZ, Frank RN, Shin DH, et al. Risk factors for retinal vein occlusions: a casecontrol study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(4): Sekimoto M, Hayasaka S, Setogawa T. Type of arteriovenous crossing at site of branch retinal vein occlusion. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1992;36(2): Sperduto RD, Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson JA, et al. Risk factors for branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116(2): Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. Risk factors for central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(5): Simons BD, Brucker AJ. Branch retinal vein occlusion: axial length and other risk factors. Retina. 1997;17(3): Salomon O, Moisseiev J, Rosenberg N, et al. Analysis of genetic polymorphisms related to thrombosis and other risk factors in patients with retinal vein occlusion. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1998;9(7): Marcucci R, Bertini L, Giusti B, et al. Thrombophilic risk factors in patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86(3): Kadayifçilar S, Ozatli D, Ozcebe O, et al. Is activated factor VII associated with retinal vein occlusion? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(10): Shahsuvaryan ML, Melkonyan AK. Central retinal vein occlusion risk profile: a case-control study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13(5): Yaghoubi GH, Madarshahian F, Mosavi M. Hyperhomocysteinaemia: risk of retinal vascular occlusion. East Mediterr Health J. 2004;10(4-5): Yildirim C, Yaylali V, Tatlipinar S, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia: a risk factor for retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218(2): WegerM,RennerW,SteinbruggerI,etal.Roleofthrombophilicgenepolymorphisms in branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(11): Wong TY, Larsen EK, Klein R, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors for retinal vein occlusion and arteriolar emboli: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities & Cardiovascular Health studies. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4): Gumus K, Kadayifcilar S, Eldem B, et al. Is elevated level of soluble endothelial protein C receptor a new risk factor for retinal vein occlusion? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34(4): Pinna A, Carru C, Solinas G, Zinellu A, Carta F. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48(6): Leoncini G, Bruzzese D, Signorello MG, et al. Platelet activation by collagen is increased in retinal vein occlusion. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97(2): Cugati S, Wang JJ, Knudtson MD, et al. Retinal vein occlusion and vascular mortality: pooled data analysis of 2 population-based cohorts. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(3): Padwal RS, Hemmelgarn BR, McAlister FA, et al. The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension, part 1: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Can J Cardiol. 2007;23(7): Khan, Hemmelgarn BR, Padwal RS, et al. The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension, part 2: therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2007;23(7): Mohamed Q, McIntosh RL, Saw SM, Wong TY. Interventions for central retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(3): McIntosh RL, Mohamed Q, Saw SM, Wong TY. Interventions for branch retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(5): Koizumi H, Ferrara DC, Bruè C, Spaide RF. Central retinal vein occlusion casecontrol study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(6): Wong TY, Mitchell P. The eye in hypertension [published correction appears in Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2078]. Lancet. 2007;369(9559):