Novel sequence variants associated with bone mineral density

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Novel sequence variants associated with bone mineral density"

Transcription

1 Supplementary Material: Novel sequence variants associated with bone mineral density Unnur Styrkarsdottir 1*, Bjarni V. Halldorsson 1,2, Solveig Gretarsdottir 1, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson 1, G. Bragi Walters 1, Thorvaldur Ingvarsson 3, Thorbjorg Jonsdottir 1, Jona Saemundsdottir 1, Steinunn Snorradóttir 1, Jacqueline R. Center 4, Tuan V. Nguyen 4, Peter Alexandersen 5, Jeffrey R. Gulcher 1, John A. Eisman 4, Claus Christiansen 6, Gunnar Sigurdsson 7, Augustine Kong 1, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir 1, Kari Stefansson 1* 1deCODE Genetics, Sturlugata 8, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland 2 Reykjavik University, Kringlan 1, IS-103 Reykjavik, Iceland 3 FSA University Hospital, Institution of Health Science, University of Akureyri, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland 4Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst; St Vincent s Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia 5Center for Clinical and Basic Research A/S, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark 6 Nordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev Hovedgade 207, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark 7Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospital, IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland *Corresponding author: Kari Stefansson, decode Genetics, Sturlugata 8, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland; tel: , fax: , kari.stefansson@decode.is; Unnur Styrkarsdottir, decode Genetics, Sturlugata 8, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland; tel: , fax: , unnur.styrkarsdottir@decode.is 1

2 Supplementary Methods: Study populations: The Icelandic discovery sample set comprised 5,934 women and 931 men who had dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA, Hologic QDR4500A) bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and the hip ( values at the femoral neck, trochanter and intertrochanter region). There were 6,674 (5,759 women) with hip measurement and 6,862 (5,931 women) with spine measurement. Of this group, 1,200 women were selected for IlluminaHap300K genotyping because of their low BMD (<- 1.2 SD of age and weight corrected BMD) as a part of our osteoporosis genetic program. All others were genotyped on Illumina Hap300K through other disease projects. The Icelandic replication group was comprised of 2,252 women and 884 men. Information on diseases that influence BMD or medications that have an effect on BMD (e.g. Hormone Replacement Therapy or Corticosteroids use) was only available for 2,800 of the original discovery set and for 1,500 of the replication samples. No subjects with BMD values were excluded from the study. Most low-impact fractures were self-reported in a detailed questionnaire; reports of hip fractures were obtained from hospital records at Reykjavik s University Hospital or the General Hospital, Akureyri. Fractures of fingers, hands, toes, or feet were not included. Of the fracture cases used in this study (n=3,015) 1,902 (63%) had BMD measurement. The control group used in the fracture case control analysis (n= 29,089) were genotyped on Illumina Hap300K through other projects at decode. All participants gave informed consent and the study was approved by the Data Protection Commission of Iceland (DPC) and the National Bioethics Committee of Iceland. The Danish samples were derived from the Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factor (PERF study) 1. These are postmenopausal women (n = 3,884), in the age range years, taking part in a prospective epidemiological study and in various clinical trials for osteoporosis at the Center for Clinical and Basic Research, Copenhagen. Baseline DEXA- measurement (Hologic QDR2000) at the hip (total hip) and lumbar spine (L2-L4) was used for 3,884. Osteoporotic fractures (n=905) included self-reported low trauma fractures and vertebral fractures assessed by digital measurements of morphologic changes. 97% of the fracture cases also had a BMD measurement. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Copenhagen County and was in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The Australian cohort in this study is from the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES) 2, including 571 males and 920 females in the age range years. All are of Caucasian ethnicity. Bone mineral density was measured at the lumbar spine and the hip femoral neck (FNBMD) by DEXA (LUNAR DPX-L). Osteoporotic fractures (n=550) included low trauma fractures assessed by questionnaire and ascertained by reviewing all radiography reports. All fracture 2

3 cases also had a BMD measurement. The study was approved by the St. Vincent s Ethics Review Committee (Sydney), and all subjects gave written informed consent. Summary characteristics of the study populations Iceland discovery Iceland Replication Denmark Australia Men Women Men Women Women Men Women # Age (SD), year Age-range, year BMI (SD), kg/m2 Height (SD), cm Weight (SD), kg raw HipBMD (SD), g/cm HipBMDcorr., (SD) raw SpineBMD (SD), g/cm SpineBMDcorr., (SD) Genotyping: Samples for the genome-wide association study were assayed with the Infinium humanhap300 or humancnv370 SNP chips (Illumina). Three different versions of the chips were used, humanhap300, humanhap300-duo and humancnv370. The analysis was restricted to SNPs that had a call rate of 97% on each of the chip types and did not deviate from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (P>10-7 ) on any chip type. Thus, the final analyses used 305,051 SNPs. A genome-wide significant for association using the full set of markers is therefore set as (=0.05/305,051) for one phenotype. The marker map from Illumina, HumanHap300_v1.0.0_SNP_nsSNP_annotation, was used for analysis of the non-synonymous SNPs 3

4 present on the chips. This map contains 7,339 SNPs, of which 6,980 passed our quality filters and were used in the analysis. All single-snp genotyping was carried out at decode Genetics on the Centaurus (Nanogen) platform3. The quality of each Centaurus SNP assay was evaluated by genotyping each assay in the CEU HapMap samples and comparing the results with the HapMap data. The Icelandic set contained 300 individuals that were genotyped on both the humancnv370 chip and with individual assays and were used for genotype comparisons. Assays with a mismatch rate >1.5% were not used, and a linkage disequilibrium (LD) test was used for markers known to be in LD. Standardization and Association analysis: Age and weight corrected bone mineral density was computed for each sex and population separately to have a mean 0 and standard deviation 1 (commonly known as weight corrected Z-scores in the bone field). Bone density increased linearly with weight in both genders. For women we modeled bone density to decrease linearly after the age of 45 while for men we modeled bone density to decrease linearly in all age ranges. For the Icelandic population regression was done against a randomly recruited reference group 4. In the Australian and Danish cohorts correction was done against the whole cohort 1,2. For each SNP, a linear regression, using the genotype as an additive covariate and standardized bone density as the response, was fitted to test for association. Each SNP was tested separately for its association with bone mineral density of the hip and for its association with bone mineral density of the lumbar spine. We tested the additive model against the full model (i.e. treating the genotype as a categorical variable) and no significant deviation from the additive model was detected (P>0.05 for all SNPs in Table 1). For association analysis of osteoporotic fractures a standard likelihood ratio statistics was used, as implemented in the NEMO software created at decode 5, to calculate two-sided s and odds ratio (OR) for each individual allele, assuming a multiplicative model for risk, i.e., that the risk of the two alleles a person carries multiply. Allelic frequencies, rather than carrier frequencies are presented for the markers. Our program, NEMO, was used for evaluating the measures of LD between individual markers. Results from multiple case-control groups were using a Mantel-Haenszel model in which the groups were allowed to have different population frequencies for alleles, haplotypes and genotypes but were assumed to have a common relative risk 6. The threshold for genome-wide significance was set at a of less than (=0.05/305,051) for each phenotype and the threshold for replication was set at a of less than 0.05 in the Danish and Australian replication sets. 4

5 Correction for relatedness and genomic control For the Icelandic discovery sample, the method of genomic control was used to adjust for the relatedness of the subjects 7. To do that, we transformed the (unadjusted) s, based on the t- tests, to 1-df chi-square statistics. The inflation factor λ for the chi-square statistics was estimated as 1.21 for hip BMD and 1.24 for spine BMD. The unadjusted chi-square statistics were divided by this inflation factor λ to obtain the adjusted test statistics. For the analysis an inflation factor for the test statistics was computed using simulations using our genealogical database: We created simulated genotypes by choosing uniformly at random a minor allele frequency as a multiple of 5% in the range 5% to 50%. We then randomly assign alleles to individuals born in the year 1700 or earlier. Individuals born after year 1700 were randomly assigned one of their parents genotypes. The s obtained from associating the BMD to these genotypes, assuming that the patients are unrelated, was converted to a corresponding 1 df chi-square statistic that gives the same. This chi-square statistic was then divided by the inflation factor to obtain the adjusted chi-square statistic and the adjusted. This inflation factor was estimated as λ = 1.22 for hip, 1.21 for spine and 1.24 for fractures. For comparison purposes we also simulated inflation factor for the original population, these were estimated as 1.17 (hip) and 1.16 (spine). The actual sample size divided by this inflation factor was used as an estimate of the effective sample size. An overall Z -score was calculated by summing the Z -scores weighted by the square root of the effective sample size, over all populations, and dividing by the square root of the sum of the sample sizes. An overall estimate of the effect per allele was calculated by weighting together the effects in each population by the population s effective sample size. Stratification analysis in the DOES cohort Because of a known, although very small, Asian component to the DOES cohort we performed a principle component analysis in order to investigate whether the observed effect on bone density could be due to stratification. The analysis was based on 78 independent SNPs, one from each considered region. We found that the first two principle components did not significantly associate with bone density, suggesting that even if there is stratification there is no substantial difference in bone density in the two sample sets. Further, no meaningful impact on the s was observed when we added these principle components as covariates Interaction between loci Possible interaction between the multiple variants considered in this publication was investigated by comparing a model which includes pairwise interaction terms for the multiple 5

6 variants presented in this paper to the additive model without the interaction terms. This interaction model did not provide a significantly better fit (P= 0.25 spine, P = 0.11 hip). Database Accession numbers GeneID accession numbers for the genes MARK3: 4140 (Unigene Hs.35828), SOST: 50964, Osx: , RANK: 8792, C17orf53: 78995, LRP4: 4038, ADAM19: 8728 and IBSP: References: 1. Bagger, Y.Z. et al. Osteoporos Int 17, (2006). 2. Nguyen, T.V., Sambrook, P.N. & Eisman, J.A. J Bone Miner Res 12, (1997). 3. Kutyavin, I.V. et al. Nucl. Acids Res. 34, e128- (2006). 4. Gudmundsdottir, S.L., Indridason, O.S., Franzson, L. & Sigurdsson, G. J Clin Densitom 8, 80-6 (2005). 5. Gretarsdottir, S. et al. Nat Genet 35, (2003). 6. Mantel, N. & Haenszel, W. J Natl Cancer Inst 22, (1959). 7. Devlin, B. & Roeder, K. Biometrics 55, (1999). 6

7 Supplementary Tables Supplementary Table 1 Results for SNPs in a genome-scan of hip bone mineral density. Part A) Results for the top 100 associated SNPs with hip bone mineral density and Part B) Results for the top 20 non-synonymous or potentially functional SNPs with hip bone density. The SNPs are listed as they are ranked in the genome-wide association scan of hip bone mineral density in the Icelandic discovery set. The allelic frequency is given for the Icelandic set, the corrected in the Icelandic discovery set, the in the set of the Danish (DK) samples and the Australian DOES cohort (AUS), the effect on hip bone density (BMD) in all the sets (Icelandic, discovery and replication, the Danish and the Australian) with the corresponding for all the sets. The odds ratios (OR) and s are shown for all the sets. The effect on spine bone density and are also shown for all the sets. The markers that were included in our previous report (NEJM) and those that reached the criteria of P < 0.1 in the first replication stage (P<0.1 DK1) are indicated. The estimated effect on bone density is expressed as standard deviations below the population average, per copy of the allele. All s are two-sided. The markers that failed in replication are indicated by a * and NA for for DK and AUS. The markers reaching genome-wide significance that were not included or did not reach genome-wide significance in our previous report are indicated by bold typesetting across the marker, the P-values for all markers reaching genome-wide significance level are indicated by red and bold typesetting, and those replicating in the Danish and Australian datasets by red typesetting. 7 A) Top 100 associated SNPs Allele marker Position_build36 Freq. discovery set for DK and AUS Effect in all sets P Value All sets OR low-trauma fracture lowtrauma fracture Effect on Spine BMD in all sets for Spine BMD G rs chr1_ E (-0.18, -0.10) 2.5E (1.08, 1.27) 1.4E (-0.16, -0.08) 2.4E-08 NEJM Comment A rs chr6_ E (-0.10, -0.04) 5.5E (1.01, 1.15) (-0.10, -0.04) 2.4E-06 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 8.1E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.11, -0.06) 3.5E-09 NEJM A rs chr1_ E E (-0.18, -0.11) 1.2E (1.06, 1.22) 4.6E (-0.14, -0.07) 7.0E-09 NEJM A rs chr9_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 4.4E (1.00, 1.16) (-0.06, 0.01) 0.11 T rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 1.3E (0.98, 1.10) (-0.11, -0.05) 2.2E-08 NEJM A rs chr9_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 2.6E (1.01, 1.14) (-0.06, 0.00) NEJM G rs chr4_ E (-0.07, -0.02) (0.95, 1.07) (-0.07, -0.01) NEJM G rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.06) 4.0E (1.00, 1.11) (-0.12, -0.06) 1.9E-10 NEJM G rs chr14_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.93, 1.07) (-0.07, 0.00) G rs chr19_ E (-0.15, -0.01) (0.89, 1.16) (-0.12, 0.11) 0.93 G rs chr9_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 4.7E (0.96, 1.10) (-0.04, 0.03) 0.78 T rs chr7_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 1.7E (1.03, 1.15) (-0.08, -0.02) 5.1E-04 P<0.1 DK1 T rs chr5_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.99, 1.13) (-0.08, -0.02)

8 C rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.06) 2.2E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.12, -0.06) 4.2E-09 P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr9_ E (-0.09, -0.02) 5.8E (0.96, 1.11) (-0.04, 0.03) 0.79 G rs chr3_ E (-0.10, -0.02) (0.96, 1.11) (-0.08, 0.01) 0.14 NEJM G rs chr1_ E E (-0.14, -0.07) 1.0E (1.02, 1.16) (-0.11, -0.04) 9.3E-06 P<0.1 DK1 G rs chr8_ E (-0.07, -0.02) (0.98, 1.09) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.13 G rs * chr15_ E-05 NA (-0.12, -0.05) 1.7E (0.96, 1.12) (-0.10, -0.02) C rs chr18_ E (-0.09, -0.01) (0.94, 1.10) (-0.12, -0.03) 6.8E-04 NEJM A rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 1.5E (0.99, 1.12) (-0.13, -0.07) 1.6E-10 NEJM C rs chr20_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.98, 1.10) (-0.06, -0.00) NEJM G rs * chr6_ E-05 NA (-0.13, -0.05) 9.7E (1.00, 1.17) (-0.15, -0.06) 9.4E-07 A rs chr2_ E (-0.13, -0.03) (0.98, 1.19) (-0.09, 0.01) 0.13 NEJM G rs chr6_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.97, 1.09) (-0.09, -0.03) 2.5E-04 NEJM C rs chr10_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 3.8E (0.97, 1.08) (-0.08, -0.02) P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr2_ E (-0.09, -0.04) 1.6E (0.98, 1.09) (-0.06, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 G rs chr4_ E (-0.10, -0.00) (0.93, 1.12) (-0.11, -0.01) C rs chr8_ E (-0.08, -0.01) (0.89, 1.02) (-0.05, 0.02) 0.38 T rs chr4_ E (-0.10, -0.00) (0.93, 1.15) (-0.11, -0.00) NEJM C rs * chr16_ E-05 NA (-0.37, -0.13) 4.7E (0.93, 1.52) (-0.24, 0.02) A rs chr19_ E (-0.10, -0.04) 3.5E (0.99, 1.13) (-0.08, -0.00) NEJM G rs chr19_ E (-0.27, -0.09) 7.3E (0.78, 1.16) (-0.17, 0.02) 0.11 T rs chr11_ E (-0.17, -0.04) (0.92, 1.20) (-0.12, 0.01) 0.12 A rs * chr6_ E-05 NA (-0.11, -0.03) (0.97, 1.10) (-0.10, -0.03) T rs chr6_ E E (-0.12, -0.06) 8.0E (0.97, 1.10) (-0.14, -0.08) 6.6E-13 NEJM T rs chr18_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 9.9E (1.02, 1.15) (-0.08, -0.02) 3.0E-04 G rs chrx_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 5.5E (0.95, 1.06) (-0.06, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 A rs chrx_ E (-0.16, -0.02) (0.88, 1.16) (-0.13, 0.01) A rs chr13_ E (-0.10, -0.02) (1.00, 1.18) (-0.10, -0.02) A rs chr17_ E (-0.10, -0.05) 2.1E (1.01, 1.13) (-0.07, -0.02) P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr6_ E (-0.08, -0.02) 7.5E (0.97, 1.09) (-0.06, 0.00) T rs chrx_ E (-0.09, -0.04) 1.3E (0.99, 1.11) (-0.07, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 T rs chr4_ E (-0.10, -0.00) (0.89, 1.08) (-0.11, 0.00) C rs chr3_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.97, 1.11) (-0.06, 0.01) 0.13 G rs chr6_ E (-0.10, -0.05) 2.2E (1.02, 1.13) (-0.11, -0.05) 9.5E-08 NEJM C rs chr13_ E (-0.10, -0.02) (1.01, 1.18) (-0.10, -0.02) G rs chr8_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.90, 1.04) (-0.04, 0.02) 0.57 C rs * chr9_ E-05 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 2.3E (0.95, 1.12) (-0.09, -0.01) T rs chr6_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.96, 1.09) (-0.05, 0.01)

9 A rs chr11_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 7.2E (1.01, 1.16) (-0.08, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 T rs chr17_ E (-0.10, -0.05) 1.0E (1.04, 1.17) 6.1E (-0.08, -0.02) NEJM G rs chr15_ E (-0.09, -0.02) 9.5E (1.00, 1.13) (-0.06, 0.01) 0.23 G rs chr10_ E (-0.15, -0.04) 2.8E (0.98, 1.23) (-0.11, -0.00) T rs chr4_ E (-0.09, -0.02) (0.95, 1.09) (-0.06, 0.01) 0.12 A rs chr14_ E E (-0.11, -0.06) 1.8E (1.03, 1.15) (-0.08, -0.03) 2.3E-04 P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr3_ E (-0.08, -0.02) 3.9E (0.97, 1.08) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.11 G rs872593* chr3_ E-05 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 3.1E (0.99, 1.16) (-0.11, -0.03) 8.8E-04 G rs * chr9_ E-05 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 1.2E (0.96, 1.12) (-0.05, 0.03) 0.54 A rs chr4_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (1.00, 1.12) (-0.06, -0.00) G rs chr5_ E (-0.08, -0.01) (0.96, 1.10) (-0.06, 0.00) A rs * chr3_ E-05 NA (-0.11, -0.03) 3.1E (0.93, 1.09) (-0.06, 0.02) 0.31 C rs chr6_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.95, 1.08) (-0.05, 0.02) 0.29 A rs * chr14_ E-04 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 1.3E (1.01, 1.18) (-0.10, -0.01) C rs chr4_ E (-0.11, -0.03) 5.4E (0.94, 1.10) (-0.08, 0.00) NEJM G rs chr3_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 9.4E (1.00, 1.11) (-0.08, -0.02) 2.8E-04 P<0.1 DK1 T rs chr13_ E (-0.10, -0.02) (1.01, 1.19) (-0.10, -0.02) T rs chr12_ E (-0.09, -0.03) (0.96, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.00) T rs chr13_ E (-0.10, -0.02) (1.00, 1.18) (-0.10, -0.03) T rs chr8_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 1.6E (0.91, 1.06) (-0.07, 0.01) 0.13 T rs chr16_ E (-0.10, -0.01) (1.03, 1.28) (-0.09, 0.00) T rs chr6_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 4.1E (0.99, 1.10) (-0.09, -0.03) 2.3E-05 NEJM G rs * chr4_ E-04 NA (-0.13, -0.04) (0.93, 1.10) (-0.10, -0.01) G rs289061* chr12_ E-04 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 2.2E (0.99, 1.18) (-0.10, -0.01) T rs chr5_ E (-0.11, -0.03) 6.4E (1.01, 1.19) (-0.10, -0.02) G rs * chr6_ E-04 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 3.0E (1.03, 1.20) (-0.07, 0.01) 0.13 C rs chr18_ E (-0.15, -0.05) 1.5E (1.00, 1.24) (-0.12, -0.01) NEJM A rs chr17_ E (-0.10, -0.05) 2.2E (1.03, 1.15) (-0.08, -0.03) 2.1E-04 P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr6_ E (-0.09, -0.04) 4.4E (1.05, 1.17) 3.7E (-0.11, -0.05) 1.5E-08 NEJM C rs chr3_ E (-0.08, -0.03) 2.1E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.08, -0.02) 4.7E-04 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr17_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 8.5E (0.98, 1.11) (-0.07, -0.01) A rs chr6_ E (-0.12, -0.05) 1.3E (0.99, 1.13) (-0.13, -0.06) 5.7E-08 NEJM G rs chr3_ E (-0.07, -0.02) 3.3E (0.99, 1.10) (-0.05, 0.00) P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr4_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 5.5E (0.94, 1.09) (-0.06, 0.01) 0.13 G rs chr18_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 3.1E (0.99, 1.13) (-0.09, -0.02) 5.8E-04 T rs chr19_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (1.05, 1.19) (-0.07, -0.01) T rs chr1_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 5.9E (0.99, 1.16) (-0.08, 0.00)

10 A rs405717* chr4_ E-04 NA (-0.10, -0.02) (1.04, 1.20) (-0.07, 0.02) 0.20 C rs chr11_ E (-0.13, -0.02) (0.99, 1.24) (-0.10, 0.01) 0.12 T rs chr1_ E (-0.09, -0.02) 9.1E (0.93, 1.06) (-0.05, 0.03) 0.54 C rs chr6_ E (-0.14, -0.03) (0.89, 1.11) (-0.10, 0.01) 0.12 T rs chr1_ E (-0.09, -0.02) 8.0E (0.92, 1.06) (-0.05, 0.03) 0.52 A rs chr22_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.97, 1.09) (-0.04, 0.03) 0.72 P<0.1 DK1 A rs563811* chr11_ E-04 NA (-0.11, -0.03) 4.0E (0.98, 1.15) (-0.08, 0.00) T rs chr6_ E (-0.07, -0.02) (1.01, 1.12) (-0.07, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr5_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 2.0E (0.99, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr17_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 7.7E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.08, -0.02) P<0.1 DK1 G rs * chrx_ E-04 NA (-0.10, -0.03) 1.9E (1.02, 1.19) (-0.08, -0.01) G rs chr1_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.96, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.01) B) Top 20 non-synonymous SNPs or potentially functional SNPs Allele marker Gene - change Freq. discovery set for DK and AUS Effect on hip BMD in all sets P Value All sets OR low-trauma fracture lowtrauma fracture Effect on Spine BMD in all sets for Spine BMD A rs C6orf97-V604I E (-0.11, -0.05) 1.5E (0.99, 1.12) (-0.13, -0.07) 1.6E-10 NEJM C rs * RPGRIP1L-Q774R E-05 NA (-0.37, -0.13) 4.7E (0.93, 1.52) (-0.24, 0.02) T rs KANK4-A840V E (-0.10, -0.03) 5.9E (0.99, 1.16) (-0.08, 0.00) Comment A rs ADAM19-G284S E (-0.09, -0.03) 2.0E (0.99, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 T rs ADCY6-S674A E (-0.21, -0.05) (1.02, 1.45) (-0.19, -0.02) P<0.1 DK1 T rs * ZSWIM2-C265Y E-04 NA (-0.19, -0.06) 2.1E (0.89, 1.16) (-0.16, -0.02) T rs C17orf53-P126T E (-0.10, -0.04) 8.9E (0.98, 1.11) (-0.06, 0.00) P<0.1 DK1 G rs ZSWIM2-I302T E (-0.13, -0.02) (0.91, 1.14) (-0.13, -0.02) A rs FAM118A-H239R E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.97, 1.10) (-0.04, 0.03) 0.78 P<0.1 DK1 T rs CPN2-V536M E (-0.09, -0.03) 9.2E (0.99, 1.11) (-0.07, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 T rs ERLIN1-V291I E (-0.07, -0.02) 5.6E (0.99, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.02) P<0.1 DK1 G rs OR5G1P E (-0.11, -0.02) (1.11, 1.34) 5.3E (-0.10, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 A rs CPN2-A305T E (-0.09, -0.03) 9.2E (0.99, 1.12) (-0.07, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 C rs TBC1D2-T241P E (-0.08, -0.02) 3.1E (0.98, 1.10) (-0.06, -0.00) P<0.1 DK1 A rs IBSP-G195E (-0.09, -0.03) 4.6E (0.99, 1.11) (-0.09, -0.03) 9.1E-05 P<0.1 DK1 A rs * WDR60-R273Q NA (-0.10, -0.03) (1.01, 1.19) (-0.09, -0.01) C rs WDSOF1-R47S (-0.08, -0.01) (0.95, 1.09) (-0.04, 0.02) 0.49 T rs LTBP (-0.07, -0.01) (0.97, 1.08) (-0.06, 0.00) P<0.1 DK1 T rs * ZNF645-D166E NA (-0.22, -0.06) (0.78, 1.11) (-0.13, 0.04) 0.29 C rs LRP4-I1086V (-0.09, -0.04) 2.1E (1.02, 1.14) (-0.06, -0.00) P<0.1 DK1 10

11 Supplementary Table 2. Results for SNPs in a genome-scan of spine bone mineral density. Part A) Results for the top 100 associated SNPs with hip bone mineral density and Part B) Results for the top 20 non-synonymous or potentially functional SNPs with hip bone density. The SNPs are listed as they are ranked in the genome-wide association scan in the Icelandic discovery set. The allelic frequency is given for the Icelandic set, the corrected in the Icelandic discovery set, the in the set of the Danish (DK) samples and the Australian DOES cohort (AUS), the effect on spine bone density (BMD) in all the sets (Icelandic, discovery and replication, the Danish and the Australian) with the corresponding for all the sets. The odds ratios (OR) and s are shown for all the sets. The effect on hip bone density and are also shown for all the sets. The markers that were included in our previous report (NEJM) and those that reached the criteria of P < 0.1 in the first replication stage (P<0.1 DK1) are indicated. The estimated effect on bone density is expressed as standard deviations below the population average, per copy of the allele. All s are two-sided. The markers that failed in replication are indicated by a * and NA for for DK and AUS. The markers reaching genome-wide significance that were not included or did not reach genome-wide significance in our previous report are indicated by bold typesetting across the marker, the P-values for all markers reaching genome-wide significance level are indicated by red and bold typesetting, and those replicating in the Danish and Australian datasets by red typesetting. A) Top 100 associated SNPs Allele marker Position_build36 Freq. discovery set for DK and AUS Effect in all sets P Value All sets OR low-trauma fracture lowtrauma fracture Effect on Hip BMD in all sets T rs chr13_ E E (-0.15, -0.09) 1.5E (0.96, 1.08) (-0.10, -0.04) 1.2E-06 NEJM A rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 1.5E (1.05, 1.17) 3.7E (-0.09, -0.04) 4.4E-06 NEJM T rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 2.2E (0.98, 1.10) (-0.11, -0.05) 1.3E-08 NEJM C rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.06) 3.5E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.11, -0.05) 8.1E-09 NEJM T rs chr6_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.95, 1.07) (-0.06, -0.00) NEJM C rs chr6_ E (-0.11, -0.06) 3.9E (0.98, 1.09) (-0.09, -0.04) 6.9E-07 NEJM A rs chr13_ E (-0.13, -0.07) 3.0E (0.91, 1.04) (-0.11, -0.05) 7.9E-07 NEJM T rs chr6_ E E (-0.14, -0.08) 6.6E (0.97, 1.10) (-0.12, -0.06) 8.0E-10 NEJM G rs chr6_ E (-0.12, -0.06) 1.9E (1.00, 1.11) (-0.11, -0.06) 4.0E-10 NEJM A rs chr8_ E E (-0.14, -0.08) 1.4E (1.00, 1.11) (-0.11, -0.06) 6.9E-10 NEJM G rs * chr6_ E-06 NA (-0.15, -0.06) 9.4E (1.00, 1.17) (-0.13, -0.05) 9.7E-06 G rs chr2_ E (-0.10, -0.04) 3.5E (1.06, 1.19) 8.6E (-0.07, -0.01) NEJM for Hip BMD Comment C rs chr8_ E E (-0.14, -0.09) 1.1E (1.00, 1.11) (-0.12, -0.07) 3.1E-13 P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr6_ E (-0.10, -0.04) 2.4E (1.01, 1.15) (-0.10, -0.04) 5.5E-07 P<0.1 DK1 G rs chr2_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 3.6E (1.04, 1.17) (-0.07, -0.02) NEJM A rs chr18_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 2.0E (0.93, 1.05) (-0.07, -0.02) NEJM C rs chr11_ E (-0.13, -0.04) 2.0E (0.93, 1.13) (-0.07, 0.01)

12 A rs chr8_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.96, 1.06) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.17 NEJM T rs chr12_ E (-0.08, -0.01) (0.93, 1.07) (-0.07, -0.01) G rs chr12_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.93, 1.05) (-0.07, -0.02) G rs chr6_ E (-0.10, -0.04) 3.1E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.08, -0.03) 2.6E-05 NEJM A rs chr12_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 1.3E (0.99, 1.11) (-0.08, -0.02) 5.6E-04 NEJM A rs chr21_ E (-0.13, -0.05) 6.4E (0.99, 1.15) (-0.08, -0.00) NEJM C rs chr8_ E E (-0.14, -0.08) 2.1E (1.01, 1.12) (-0.12, -0.06) 1.5E-11 NEJM C rs chr9_ E (-0.15, -0.04) (0.84, 1.06) (-0.13, -0.03) NEJM G rs chr6_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 2.5E (0.97, 1.09) (-0.07, -0.01) NEJM C rs chr18_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 7.3E (0.93, 1.05) (-0.07, -0.02) NEJM G rs chr8_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.91, 1.04) (-0.06, 0.00) T rs chr16_ E (-0.10, -0.04) 2.8E (0.96, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.01) T rs chr16_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 4.3E (0.96, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.00) T rs * chr14_ E-05 NA (-0.19, -0.07) 1.5E (1.07, 1.36) (-0.14, -0.03) A rs chr3_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 1.2E (0.97, 1.12) (-0.06, 0.00) A rs chr8_ E (-0.12, -0.06) 5.2E (0.97, 1.08) (-0.09, -0.04) 5.3E-07 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr10_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.97, 1.08) (-0.09, -0.03) 3.8E-05 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chrx_ E (-0.05, 0.01) (0.93, 1.04) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.18 NEJM C rs * chr10_ E-05 NA (-0.13, -0.05) 2.5E (1.00, 1.17) (-0.11, -0.03) 6.3E-04 A rs chr12_ E (-0.10, -0.04) 4.6E (0.96, 1.07) (-0.07, -0.01) NEJM T rs238256* chr13_ E-05 NA (-0.14, -0.05) 1.3E (0.94, 1.11) (-0.06, 0.03) 0.47 A rs chr2_ E (-0.09, -0.02) 7.1E (0.93, 1.04) (-0.05, 0.02) 0.39 P<0.1 DK1 T rs chr13_ E E (-0.15, -0.08) 5.4E (1.00, 1.15) (-0.07, -0.00) C rs chr9_ E (-0.12, -0.04) 9.7E (0.99, 1.15) (-0.09, -0.01) NEJM T rs chr5_ E (-0.12, -0.03) 7.5E (0.94, 1.13) (-0.10, -0.02) C rs chrx_ E (-0.09, -0.01) (0.91, 1.07) (-0.05, 0.02) 0.37 C rs * chrx_ E-05 NA (-0.15, -0.05) 4.2E (0.95, 1.16) (-0.10, -0.01) A rs chr14_ E (-0.12, -0.04) 6.1E (1.00, 1.16) (-0.11, -0.03) 1.7E-04 NEJM G rs chr2_ E (-0.09, -0.01) (0.94, 1.09) (-0.07, 0.00) G rs * chr19_ E-05 NA (-0.15, -0.05) 4.3E (1.08, 1.28) 1.3E (-0.08, 0.01) 0.13 C rs chr3_ E (-0.08, -0.02) 5.9E (0.94, 1.05) (-0.04, 0.02) 0.48 NEJM A rs chr14_ E (-0.12, -0.04) 1.3E (1.02, 1.20) (-0.10, -0.02) NEJM G rs chr3_ E (-0.09, -0.02) (0.93, 1.07) (-0.08, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr9_ E (-0.11, -0.03) 3.7E (0.98, 1.14) (-0.08, -0.00) NEJM C rs chr17_ E (-0.06, -0.01) (0.97, 1.08) (-0.04, 0.01) 0.24 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr11_ E (-0.11, -0.04) 1.0E (0.93, 1.06) (-0.07, -0.00) NEJM T rs chr13_ E (-0.13, -0.05) 1.5E (0.91, 1.04) (-0.12, -0.05) 2.6E-06 12

13 C rs * chr16_ E-05 NA (-0.13, -0.04) 5.9E (1.00, 1.17) (-0.10, -0.02) A rs * chrx_ E-05 NA (-0.12, -0.05) 1.5E (0.93, 1.09) (-0.10, -0.03) 5.6E-04 C rs chr2_ E (-0.08, -0.02) 6.4E (1.05, 1.18) 1.5E (-0.05, 0.00) NEJM G rs chr14_ E (-0.08, -0.02) 5.7E (1.01, 1.13) (-0.08, -0.03) 1.5E-05 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr18_ E (-0.12, -0.03) 6.8E (0.94, 1.10) (-0.09, -0.01) NEJM T rs chr14_ E (-0.11, -0.02) (1.03, 1.22) (-0.08, 0.00) A rs chr2_ E (-0.09, -0.02) (0.94, 1.08) (-0.06, 0.00) G rs chr3_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 6.2E (0.93, 1.06) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.23 NEJM G rs chr8_ E (-0.09, -0.02) (0.89, 1.03) (-0.06, 0.01) 0.19 G rs chr10_ E (-0.12, -0.03) 5.2E (0.97, 1.14) (-0.09, -0.00) P<0.1 DK1 C rs chrx_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.93, 1.08) (-0.04, 0.03) 0.72 G rs chr21_ E (-0.13, -0.04) 4.6E (0.90, 1.09) (-0.06, 0.04) 0.59 A rs chr6_ E (-0.13, -0.07) 1.6E (0.99, 1.12) (-0.11, -0.05) 1.5E-08 NEJM T rs chr2_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 1.4E (0.96, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.00) T rs chr17_ E (-0.09, -0.03) 1.6E (0.94, 1.07) (-0.07, -0.00) T rs chr8_ E (-0.10, -0.03) 2.1E (0.94, 1.08) (-0.08, -0.01) G rs chr5_ E (-0.15, -0.03) (0.93, 1.16) (-0.14, -0.03) P<0.1 DK1 A rs chr12_ E (-0.13, -0.02) (0.91, 1.15) (-0.08, 0.02) 0.31 C rs chr7_ E (-0.16, -0.06) 1.0E (0.92, 1.11) (-0.14, -0.05) 9.3E-05 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr6_ E (-0.10, -0.05) 1.4E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.11, -0.06) 4.9E-10 NEJM C rs chr20_ E (-0.06, 0.00) (0.91, 1.03) (-0.05, 0.02) 0.36 NEJM G rs chr1_ E (-0.16, -0.08) 2.4E (1.08, 1.27) 1.4E (-0.18, -0.10) 2.5E-12 NEJM T rs chr10_ E (-0.08, -0.03) 1.6E (1.01, 1.13) (-0.08, -0.03) 2.9E-05 P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr6_ E (-0.12, -0.06) 4.2E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.11, -0.06) 2.2E-09 P<0.1 DK1 T rs chr8_ E (-0.11, -0.05) 7.9E (0.99, 1.11) (-0.10, -0.04) 1.7E-06 P<0.1 DK1 G rs chr1_ E (-0.09, -0.01) (0.92, 1.09) (-0.07, 0.00) C rs * chr13_ E-05 NA (-0.15, -0.05) 1.6E (0.89, 1.08) (-0.11, -0.02) C rs chr4_ E (-0.12, -0.04) 8.4E (0.91, 1.07) (-0.09, -0.01) T rs * chr12_ E-05 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 2.0E (0.94, 1.10) (-0.06, 0.02) 0.24 C rs * chr14_ E-04 NA (-0.14, -0.04) 3.4E (0.87, 1.06) (-0.09, 0.00) A rs * chr6_ E-04 NA (-0.10, -0.03) (0.97, 1.10) (-0.11, -0.03) 1.6E-04 T rs * chrx_ E-04 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 7.0E (0.95, 1.12) (-0.08, -0.00) G rs chr18_ E (-0.09, -0.02) (0.93, 1.07) (-0.07, -0.01) T rs chr5_ E (-0.12, -0.03) (0.94, 1.13) (-0.10, -0.02) G rs * chr19_ E-04 NA (-0.16, -0.05) 1.2E (1.03, 1.26) (-0.07, 0.03) 0.38 C rs chr5_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.96, 1.10) (-0.06, 0.00) G rs * chr12_ E-04 NA (-0.12, -0.04) 2.1E (1.02, 1.19) (-0.10, -0.02)

14 T rs chr21_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (1.01, 1.13) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.21 NEJM G rs chr21_ E (-0.07, -0.01) (0.99, 1.12) (-0.07, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 C rs chr16_ E (-0.08, -0.02) (0.97, 1.11) (-0.06, 0.00) G rs chr21_ E (-0.09, -0.02) (0.97, 1.12) (-0.09, -0.02) 7.0E-04 G rs13320 chr1_ E (-0.06, 0.01) (0.98, 1.09) (-0.06, 0.01) 0.17 T rs chr2_ E (-0.09, -0.02) 9.9E (0.93, 1.06) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.22 T rs chr2_ E (-0.16, -0.05) 1.7E (0.93, 1.16) (-0.12, -0.02) T rs chrx_ E (-0.07, -0.00) (0.91, 1.05) (-0.07, -0.00) T rs chr7_ E (-0.08, -0.01) (0.95, 1.10) (-0.06, 0.00) P<0.1 DK1 B) Top 20 non-synonymous SNPs or potentially functional SNPs Allele marker Gene - change Freq. discovery set for DK and AUS Effect on spine BMD in all sets P Value All sets OR low-trauma fracture lowtrauma fracture Effect on Hip BMD in all sets G rs SPTBN1-intron E (-0.10, -0.04) 3.5E (1.06, 1.19) 8.6E (-0.07, -0.01) NEJM A rs C6orf97-V604I E (-0.13, -0.07) 1.6E (0.99, 1.12) (-0.11, -0.05) 1.5E-08 NEJM G rs TDRD10-I215V E (-0.11, -0.03) 5.1E (0.89, 1.06) (-0.07, 0.00) T rs * CD300LF-R218Q E-04 NA (-0.14, -0.04) 7.4E (0.91, 1.10) (-0.07, 0.02) 0.25 C rs MED6-intron E (-0.13, -0.03) 9.2E (0.92, 1.13) (-0.10, -0.01) for Hip BMD Comment C rs10788 SERGEF-E457G E (-0.14, -0.03) (0.99, 1.23) (-0.13, -0.02) P<0.1 DK1 T rs1528 SERGEF-E429K E (-0.13, -0.03) (0.98, 1.19) (-0.12, -0.03) P<0.1 DK1 A rs ESPL1-A25D E (-0.09, -0.03) 6.7E (0.97, 1.12) (-0.06, 0.00) A rs BAT2-V1895L (-0.11, -0.02) (1.02, 1.21) (-0.10, -0.01) NEJM T rs LOC A96V (-0.10, -0.04) 3.9E (1.00, 1.12) (-0.08, -0.02) 5.4E-04 P<0.1 DK1 T rs ERLIN1-V291I (-0.07, -0.02) (0.99, 1.10) (-0.07, -0.02) 5.6E-04 P<0.1 DK1 A rs * ANKRD12-P1735S NA (-0.16, -0.03) (0.95, 1.22) (-0.12, 0.01) C rs FMN1-E239G (-0.07, -0.01) (1.01, 1.13) (-0.05, 0.00) P<0.1 DK1 T rs PTPLAD2-A36T (-0.07, -0.01) (0.94, 1.06) (-0.08, -0.02) P<0.1 DK1 A rs RASSF4-G88R (-0.09, -0.01) (0.95, 1.10) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.22 P<0.1 DK1 G rs conserved region (-0.06, 0.00) (0.95, 1.09) (-0.05, 0.02) 0.36 C rs KIF18A-I735V (-0.07, -0.01) (0.94, 1.05) (-0.05, 0.01) 0.13 P<0.1 DK1 C rs9898 HRG-S204P (-0.07, 0.00) (0.96, 1.11) (-0.06, 0.00) C rs RGNEF-Q284P (-0.06, -0.00) (0.96, 1.06) (-0.06, -0.01) P<0.1 DK1 A rs ITGA11-L471M (-0.16, -0.02) (0.97, 1.31) (-0.12, 0.02)

15 Supplementary Table 3. Comparison of current and previous results for previously reported loci. Part A), markers from genome-wide significant regions in our previous publication (Styrkarsdottir et. al., NEJM 2008), Part B), suggestively associated loci reported in the same publication, and Part C), the LRP5 marker that was reported genome-wide significant by Richard et. al. (Lancet 2008) and vanmeurs et. al. (JAMA 2008). Data for this marker is only for the Icelandic discovery set. The s of association in the previous publication and in the current dataset are shown, and the effect on bone density in all sets in the current study for hip and spine bone density. All the markers shown replicate nominally in the Danish and Australian sets for either hip or spine bone denstiy or both. Markers that were not included in previous publication but reach genome-wide significance (part A) and replicate nominally in the current dataset are marked as new 15 Allele marker A) 1p36.12 Frequency P Value Previous Study Hip P Value Current Study Effect in all sets P Value Previous Study Spine P Value Current Study Effect in all sets (-0.18, - A rs ) (-0.14, -0.07) (-0.18, - G rs ) (-0.16, -0.08) (-0.14, - G rs NA ) NA (-0.11, -0.04) new 6p21.32 MHC T rs * q ESR (-0.08, ) (-0.13, -0.06) C rs T rs G rs A rs A rs C rs NA C rs A rs NA ) (-0.10, -0.05) , ) (-0.14, -0.08) (-0.12, ) (-0.12, -0.06) (-0.11, ) (-0.13, -0.07) (-0.11, ) (-0.13, -0.06) new (-0.12, ) NA (-0.12, -0.06) new (-0.11, ) (-0.11, -0.06) (-0.09, - 8q OPG 0.04) NA (-0.12, -0.06) new (-0.09, -

16 C rs NA A rs C rs ) NA (-0.14, -0.09) new (-0.12, ) (-0.14, -0.08) (-0.11, ) (-0.14, -0.08) (-0.12, - 13q RANKL T rs NA (-0.07, ) NA (-0.15, -0.08) new T rs ** ) (-0.19, -0.13) (-0.13, - T rs ) (-0.15, -0.09) (-0.10, - B) 2p16.2 G rs q RANK (-0.07, ) (-0.10, -0.04) A rs A rs NA G rs C rs NA G rs ) (-0.09, -0.04) (-0.10, - 11p LRP4 0.05) NA (-0.08, -0.01) new (-0.11, ) (-0.06, 0.01) (-0.11, ) NA (-0.06, -0.00) new (-0.09, ) (-0.06, 0.00) (-0.09, - 12q Osx (SP7) A rs (-0.08, ) (-0.11, -0.05) C) 11q LRP5 T rs *** (-0.07, 0.04) (-0.13, -0.02) * not among the top100 or the top20 ns SNPs in the current scan **not on the IlluminaHap300 chip *** data for the discovery group only 16

Multiple Genetic Loci for Bone Mineral Density and Fractures

Multiple Genetic Loci for Bone Mineral Density and Fractures original article Multiple Genetic Loci for Bone Mineral Density and Fractures Unnur Styrkarsdottir, Ph.D., Bjarni V. Halldorsson, Ph.D., Solveig Gretarsdottir, Ph.D., Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Ph.D., G.

More information

University of Groningen

University of Groningen University of Groningen A variant in CDKAL1 influences insulin response and risk of type 2 diabetes Steinthorsdottir, V.; Thorleifsson, G.; Reynisdottir, I.; Benediktsson, R.; Jonsdottir, T.; Walters,

More information

Supplementary Figure 1. (a) A Q-Q plot of all the 310,520 uncorrected (red crosses) and corrected (blue star) chi-square statistics from the

Supplementary Figure 1. (a) A Q-Q plot of all the 310,520 uncorrected (red crosses) and corrected (blue star) chi-square statistics from the a b Supplementary Figure 1. (a) A Q-Q plot of all the 310,520 uncorrected (red crosses) and corrected (blue star) chi-square statistics from the single-point association. (b) Same as a except results for

More information

To test the possible source of the HBV infection outside the study family, we searched the Genbank

To test the possible source of the HBV infection outside the study family, we searched the Genbank Supplementary Discussion The source of hepatitis B virus infection To test the possible source of the HBV infection outside the study family, we searched the Genbank and HBV Database (http://hbvdb.ibcp.fr),

More information

2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media,

2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising

More information

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Figures Supplementary Figures Supplementary Fig 1. Comparison of sub-samples on the first two principal components of genetic variation. TheBritishsampleisplottedwithredpoints.The sub-samples of the diverse sample

More information

Dr Tuan V NGUYEN. Mapping Translational Research into Individualised Prognosis of Fracture Risk

Dr Tuan V NGUYEN. Mapping Translational Research into Individualised Prognosis of Fracture Risk Dr Tuan V NGUYEN Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney NSW Mapping Translational Research into Individualised Prognosis of Fracture Risk From the age of 60, one

More information

Tutorial on Genome-Wide Association Studies

Tutorial on Genome-Wide Association Studies Tutorial on Genome-Wide Association Studies Assistant Professor Institute for Computational Biology Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Case Western Reserve University Acknowledgements Dana Crawford

More information

Osteoporosis International. Original Article. Bone Mineral Density and Vertebral Fractures in Men

Osteoporosis International. Original Article. Bone Mineral Density and Vertebral Fractures in Men Osteoporos Int (1999) 10:265 270 ß 1999 International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation Osteoporosis International Original Article Bone Mineral Density and Vertebral Fractures

More information

Challenging the Current Osteoporosis Guidelines. Carolyn J. Crandall, MD, MS Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

Challenging the Current Osteoporosis Guidelines. Carolyn J. Crandall, MD, MS Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Challenging the Current Osteoporosis Guidelines Carolyn J. Crandall, MD, MS Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Whom to screen Which test How to diagnose Whom to treat Benefits

More information

A rare variant in MYH6 confers high risk of sick sinus syndrome. Hilma Hólm ESC Congress 2011 Paris, France

A rare variant in MYH6 confers high risk of sick sinus syndrome. Hilma Hólm ESC Congress 2011 Paris, France A rare variant in MYH6 confers high risk of sick sinus syndrome Hilma Hólm ESC Congress 2011 Paris, France Disclosures I am an employee of decode genetics, Reykjavik, Iceland. Sick sinus syndrome SSS is

More information

DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK SCORING SYSTEM TO PREDICT A RISK OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK SCORING SYSTEM TO PREDICT A RISK OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN October 2-4, Liverpool, UK EURO SPINE 2013 DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK SCORING SYSTEM TO PREDICT A RISK OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN D. Colangelo, L. A. Nasto, M. Mormando, E.

More information

Genome-wide association study identifies variants in TMPRSS6 associated with hemoglobin levels.

Genome-wide association study identifies variants in TMPRSS6 associated with hemoglobin levels. Supplementary Online Material Genome-wide association study identifies variants in TMPRSS6 associated with hemoglobin levels. John C Chambers, Weihua Zhang, Yun Li, Joban Sehmi, Mark N Wass, Delilah Zabaneh,

More information

Concordance of a Self Assessment Tool and Measurement of Bone Mineral Density in Identifying the Risk of Osteoporosis in Elderly Taiwanese Women

Concordance of a Self Assessment Tool and Measurement of Bone Mineral Density in Identifying the Risk of Osteoporosis in Elderly Taiwanese Women TZU CHI MED J September 2008 Vol 20 No 3 available at http://ajws.elsevier.com/tcmj Tzu Chi Medical Journal Original Article Concordance of a Self Assessment Tool and Measurement of Bone Mineral Density

More information

An audit of osteoporotic patients in an Australian general practice

An audit of osteoporotic patients in an Australian general practice professional Darren Parker An audit of osteoporotic patients in an Australian general practice Background Osteoporosis is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in Australia, and is predicted to

More information

During the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp [1], a priming dose of human insulin (Novolin,

During the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp [1], a priming dose of human insulin (Novolin, ESM Methods Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp procedure During the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp [1], a priming dose of human insulin (Novolin, Clayton, NC) was followed by a constant rate (60 mu m

More information

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES Supplementary Figure 1 Regional association plots for genome-wide significant PCOS signals. Dots represents individual SNP association P-values (on the log10 scale) in the 23andMe

More information

Discovery of common variants associated with low TSH levels and thyroid cancer risk

Discovery of common variants associated with low TSH levels and thyroid cancer risk Supplementary Information Discovery of common variants associated with low TSH levels and thyroid cancer risk Julius Gudmundsson 1*, Patrick Sulem 1*, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson 1, Jon G. Jonasson 2,3,4, Gisli

More information

Effect of Precision Error on T-scores and the Diagnostic Classification of Bone Status

Effect of Precision Error on T-scores and the Diagnostic Classification of Bone Status Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 10, no. 3, 239e243, 2007 Ó Copyright 2007 by The International Society for Clinical Densitometry 1094-6950/07/10:239e243/$32.00 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.03.002 Original

More information

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2017; 3(4): DOI:

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2017; 3(4): DOI: 2017; 3(4): 336-343 ISSN: 2395-1958 IJOS 2017; 3(4): 336-343 2017 IJOS www.orthopaper.com Received: 16-08-2017 Accepted: 17-09-2017 Dr. Pankaj Sharma Assistant Professor Department Dehradun, Uttarakhand,

More information

Genome-wide Association Analysis Applied to Asthma-Susceptibility Gene. McCaw, Z., Wu, W., Hsiao, S., McKhann, A., Tracy, S.

Genome-wide Association Analysis Applied to Asthma-Susceptibility Gene. McCaw, Z., Wu, W., Hsiao, S., McKhann, A., Tracy, S. Genome-wide Association Analysis Applied to Asthma-Susceptibility Gene McCaw, Z., Wu, W., Hsiao, S., McKhann, A., Tracy, S. December 17, 2014 1 Introduction Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease affecting

More information

Supplementary information. Supplementary figure 1. Flow chart of study design

Supplementary information. Supplementary figure 1. Flow chart of study design Supplementary information Supplementary figure 1. Flow chart of study design Supplementary Figure 2. Quantile-quantile plot of stage 1 results QQ plot of the observed -log10 P-values (y axis) versus the

More information

University of Groningen. Metabolic risk in people with psychotic disorders Bruins, Jojanneke

University of Groningen. Metabolic risk in people with psychotic disorders Bruins, Jojanneke University of Groningen Metabolic risk in people with psychotic disorders Bruins, Jojanneke IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from

More information

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. 1. Characteristics of individual studies

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. 1. Characteristics of individual studies 1. Characteristics of individual studies 1.1. RISC (Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular disease) The RISC study is based on unrelated individuals of European descent, aged 30 60

More information

Efficacy of risedronate in men with primary and secondary osteoporosis: results of a 1-year study

Efficacy of risedronate in men with primary and secondary osteoporosis: results of a 1-year study Rheumatol Int (2006) 26: 427 431 DOI 10.1007/s00296-005-0004-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE J. D. Ringe Æ H. Faber Æ P. Farahmand Æ A. Dorst Efficacy of risedronate in men with primary and secondary osteoporosis:

More information

Supplementary Figure 1: Attenuation of association signals after conditioning for the lead SNP. a) attenuation of association signal at the 9p22.

Supplementary Figure 1: Attenuation of association signals after conditioning for the lead SNP. a) attenuation of association signal at the 9p22. Supplementary Figure 1: Attenuation of association signals after conditioning for the lead SNP. a) attenuation of association signal at the 9p22.32 PCOS locus after conditioning for the lead SNP rs10993397;

More information

Recently, a DNA sequence variant of the transcription

Recently, a DNA sequence variant of the transcription Brief Report Haplotypes of Transcription Factor 7 Like 2 (TCF7L2) Gene and Its Upstream Region Are Associated With Type 2 Diabetes and Age of Onset in Mexican Americans Donna M. Lehman, 1 Kelly J. Hunt,

More information

DXA When to order? How to interpret? Dr Nikhil Tandon Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi

DXA When to order? How to interpret? Dr Nikhil Tandon Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi DXA When to order? How to interpret? Dr Nikhil Tandon Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi Clinical Utility of Bone Densitometry Diagnosis (DXA)

More information

Human population sub-structure and genetic association studies

Human population sub-structure and genetic association studies Human population sub-structure and genetic association studies Stephanie A. Santorico, Ph.D. Department of Mathematical & Statistical Sciences Stephanie.Santorico@ucdenver.edu Global Similarity Map from

More information

breast cancer; relative risk; risk factor; standard deviation; strength of association

breast cancer; relative risk; risk factor; standard deviation; strength of association American Journal of Epidemiology The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail:

More information

Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers

Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (1997) 51, 449±454 ß 1997 Stockton Press. All rights reserved 0954±3007/97 $12.00 Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics

More information

Module 5 - Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals: Fracture Risk Assessment. William D. Leslie, MD MSc FRCPC

Module 5 - Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals: Fracture Risk Assessment. William D. Leslie, MD MSc FRCPC Module 5 - Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals: Fracture Risk Assessment William D. Leslie, MD MSc FRCPC Case #1 Age 53: 3 years post-menopause Has always enjoyed excellent health with

More information

Identification of low frequency and rare sequence variants associated with elevated or reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. Supplementary information

Identification of low frequency and rare sequence variants associated with elevated or reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. Supplementary information Identification of low frequency and rare sequence variants associated with elevated or reduced risk of type 2 diabetes Supplementary information Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir 1, Gudmar Thorleifsson 1, Patrick

More information

Body Mass Index as Predictor of Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women in India

Body Mass Index as Predictor of Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women in India International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) Vol.3, No.4, December 2014, pp. 276 ~ 280 ISSN: 2252-8806 276 Body Mass Index as Predictor of Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women in India

More information

O. Bruyère M. Fossi B. Zegels L. Leonori M. Hiligsmann A. Neuprez J.-Y. Reginster

O. Bruyère M. Fossi B. Zegels L. Leonori M. Hiligsmann A. Neuprez J.-Y. Reginster DOI 10.1007/s00296-012-2460-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison of the proportion of patients potentially treated with an anti-osteoporotic drug using the current criteria of the Belgian national social security

More information

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Endocr Pract. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 11.

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Endocr Pract. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 11. NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: Endocr Pract. 2013 ; 19(5): 780 784. doi:10.4158/ep12416.or. FRAX Prediction Without BMD for Assessment of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk

More information

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1 Supplementary Figure 1 Illustrative example of ptdt using height The expected value of a child s polygenic risk score (PRS) for a trait is the average of maternal and paternal PRS values. For example,

More information

Original Article. Ramesh Keerthi Gadam, MD 1 ; Karen Schlauch, PhD 2 ; Kenneth E. Izuora, MD, MBA 1 ABSTRACT

Original Article. Ramesh Keerthi Gadam, MD 1 ; Karen Schlauch, PhD 2 ; Kenneth E. Izuora, MD, MBA 1 ABSTRACT Original Article Ramesh Keerthi Gadam, MD 1 ; Karen Schlauch, PhD 2 ; Kenneth E. Izuora, MD, MBA 1 ABSTRACT Objective: To compare Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) calculations with and without bone

More information

Supplementary Figure 1. Principal components analysis of European ancestry in the African American, Native Hawaiian and Latino populations.

Supplementary Figure 1. Principal components analysis of European ancestry in the African American, Native Hawaiian and Latino populations. Supplementary Figure. Principal components analysis of European ancestry in the African American, Native Hawaiian and Latino populations. a Eigenvector 2.5..5.5. African Americans European Americans e

More information

Supplementary Methods

Supplementary Methods Supplementary Methods Populations ascertainment and characterization Our genotyping strategy included 3 stages of SNP selection, with individuals from 3 populations (Europeans, Indian Asians and Mexicans).

More information

Lumbar spine and proximal femur BMD values in Turkish girls and the

Lumbar spine and proximal femur BMD values in Turkish girls and the Lumbar spine and proximal femur and the effect of precocious puberty on BMD. Ersoy Kekilli 1, Mustafa Arif Aluçlu 1, Fatih Batı 1, İsmail Köksal 1 1 Inonu University, Medical Faculty, Department of Nuclear

More information

QTL detection for traits of interest for the dairy goat industry

QTL detection for traits of interest for the dairy goat industry QTL detection for traits of interest for the dairy goat industry 64 th Annual Meeting EAAP 2013 26 th -30 th august Nantes, France C. Maroteau, I. Palhière, H. Larroque, V. Clément, G. Tosser-Klopp, R.

More information

Contribution of Lumbar Spine BMD to Fracture Risk in Individuals With T-Score Discordance

Contribution of Lumbar Spine BMD to Fracture Risk in Individuals With T-Score Discordance ORIGINAL ARTICLE JBMR Contribution of Lumbar Spine BMD to Fracture Risk in Individuals With T-Score Discordance Dunia Alarkawi, 1 Dana Bliuc, 1 Tuan V Nguyen, 1,2 John A Eisman, 1,2,3,4,5 and Jacqueline

More information

This is a repository copy of Microarchitecture of bone predicts fractures in older women.

This is a repository copy of Microarchitecture of bone predicts fractures in older women. This is a repository copy of Microarchitecture of bone predicts fractures in older women. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/130351/ Version: Accepted Version

More information

New Enhancements: GWAS Workflows with SVS

New Enhancements: GWAS Workflows with SVS New Enhancements: GWAS Workflows with SVS August 9 th, 2017 Gabe Rudy VP Product & Engineering 20 most promising Biotech Technology Providers Top 10 Analytics Solution Providers Hype Cycle for Life sciences

More information

Dual-energy Vertebral Assessment

Dual-energy Vertebral Assessment Dual-energy Vertebral Assessment gehealthcare.com Dual-energy Vertebral Assessment More than 40% of women with normal or osteopenic BMD had a moderate or severe vertebral deformation seen with DVA. Patrick

More information

Diagnostische Präzision von DXL im Vergleich zu DXA bei pmp Frauen mit Frakturen

Diagnostische Präzision von DXL im Vergleich zu DXA bei pmp Frauen mit Frakturen Diagnostische Präzision von DXL im Vergleich zu DXA bei pmp Frauen mit Frakturen Christian Muschitz II. Medizinische Abteilung mit Rheumatologie, Osteologie & Gastroenterologie Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus

More information

Interpreting DEXA Scan and. the New Fracture Risk. Assessment. Algorithm

Interpreting DEXA Scan and. the New Fracture Risk. Assessment. Algorithm Interpreting DEXA Scan and the New Fracture Risk Assessment Algorithm Prof. Samir Elbadawy *Osteoporosis affect 30%-40% of women in western countries and almost 15% of men after the age of 50 years. Osteoporosis

More information

CS2220 Introduction to Computational Biology

CS2220 Introduction to Computational Biology CS2220 Introduction to Computational Biology WEEK 8: GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDIES (GWAS) 1 Dr. Mengling FENG Institute for Infocomm Research Massachusetts Institute of Technology mfeng@mit.edu PLANS

More information

Purpose. Methods and Materials

Purpose. Methods and Materials Prevalence of pitfalls in previous dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans according to technical manuals and International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Poster No.: P-0046 Congress: ESSR 2014

More information

Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis Yeap SS, Hew FL, Chan SP, on behalf of the Malaysian Osteoporosis Society Committee Working Group for the Clinical Guidance on the Management of Osteoporosis,

More information

Osteoporosis: A Tale of 3 Task Forces!

Osteoporosis: A Tale of 3 Task Forces! Osteoporosis: A Tale of 3 Task Forces! Robert A. Adler, MD McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia, USA Disclosures The opinions are those of the speaker

More information

Correspondence should be addressed to Jayadevan Sreedharan,

Correspondence should be addressed to Jayadevan Sreedharan, SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research Osteoporosis Volume 2011, Article ID 876309, 4 pages doi:10.4061/2011/876309 Clinical Study Association between Body Mass Index and Bone Mineral Density in Patients Referred

More information

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content Supplementary Online Content Hartwig FP, Borges MC, Lessa Horta B, Bowden J, Davey Smith G. Inflammatory biomarkers and risk of schizophrenia: a 2-sample mendelian randomization study. JAMA Psychiatry.

More information

Components of heritability in an Icelandic cohort

Components of heritability in an Icelandic cohort Components of heritability in an Icelandic cohort Noah Zaitlen Harvard School of Public Health Conflict of Interest Disclosure Four of the authors (Helgason, Gudbjartsson, Kong, Stefansson) are shareholders

More information

Evaluation of Bone Mineral Status in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Evaluation of Bone Mineral Status in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2014;6:180-184 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.180 Evaluation of Bone Mineral Status in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Babak Pourabbas Tahvildari,

More information

Sponsor / Company: sanofi-aventis and Proctor & Gamble Drug substance(s): Risedronate (HMR4003)

Sponsor / Company: sanofi-aventis and Proctor & Gamble Drug substance(s): Risedronate (HMR4003) These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert in the country of prescription. Sponsor / Company: sanofi-aventis and

More information

MBG* Animal Breeding Methods Fall Final Exam

MBG* Animal Breeding Methods Fall Final Exam MBG*4030 - Animal Breeding Methods Fall 2007 - Final Exam 1 Problem Questions Mick Dundee used his financial resources to purchase the Now That s A Croc crocodile farm that had been operating for a number

More information

The official position of the International Society for Clinical

The official position of the International Society for Clinical Improving Clinical Decisions for Women at Risk of Osteoporosis: Dual-Femur Bone Mineral Density Testing Raymond E. Cole, DO, CCD Context: In bone mineral density (BMD) testing, unilateral hip analysis

More information

Comparison of Bone Density of Distal Radius With Hip and Spine Using DXA

Comparison of Bone Density of Distal Radius With Hip and Spine Using DXA ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison of Bone Density of Distal Radius With Hip and Spine Using DXA Leila Amiri 1, Azita Kheiltash 2, Shafieh Movassaghi 1, Maryam Moghaddassi 1, and Leila Seddigh 2 1 Rheumatology

More information

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research  ISSN: International Journal of Health Sciences and Research www.ijhsr.org ISSN: 2249-9571 Original Research Article Osteoporosis- Do We Need to Think Beyond Bone Mineral Density? Dr Preeti Soni 1, Dr Shipra

More information

Association mapping (qualitative) Association scan, quantitative. Office hours Wednesday 3-4pm 304A Stanley Hall. Association scan, qualitative

Association mapping (qualitative) Association scan, quantitative. Office hours Wednesday 3-4pm 304A Stanley Hall. Association scan, qualitative Association mapping (qualitative) Office hours Wednesday 3-4pm 304A Stanley Hall Fig. 11.26 Association scan, qualitative Association scan, quantitative osteoarthritis controls χ 2 test C s G s 141 47

More information

Available online at ScienceDirect. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 1 (2015) 109e114. Original article

Available online at  ScienceDirect. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 1 (2015) 109e114. Original article HOSTED BY Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 1 (2015) 109e114 Original article Localized femoral BMD T-scores according to the fracture site of hip and

More information

Bad to the Bones: Diabetes and Thiazolidinediones 9/9/2010. Steven Ing, MD, MSCE Assistant Professor Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism

Bad to the Bones: Diabetes and Thiazolidinediones 9/9/2010. Steven Ing, MD, MSCE Assistant Professor Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Bad to the Bones: Diabetes and Thiazolidinediones 9/9/2010 Steven Ing, MD, MSCE Assistant Professor Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Any reduction of bone mass in diabetics that is revealed

More information

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Edinburgh Research Explorer Edinburgh Research Explorer Collaborative Meta-analysis: Associations of 150 Candidate Genes With Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fracture Citation for published version: Richards, JB, Kavvoura, FK, Rivadeneira,

More information

Global variation in copy number in the human genome

Global variation in copy number in the human genome Global variation in copy number in the human genome Redon et. al. Nature 444:444-454 (2006) 12.03.2007 Tarmo Puurand Study 270 individuals (HapMap collection) Affymetrix 500K Whole Genome TilePath (WGTP)

More information

Systematic Review & Course outline. Lecture (20%) Class discussion & tutorial (30%)

Systematic Review & Course outline. Lecture (20%) Class discussion & tutorial (30%) Systematic Review & Meta-analysisanalysis Ammarin Thakkinstian, Ph.D. Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital Tel: 02-201-1269, 02-201-1762 Fax: 02-2011284

More information

Validation and comparative evaluation of four osteoporosis risk indexes in Moroccan menopausal women

Validation and comparative evaluation of four osteoporosis risk indexes in Moroccan menopausal women DOI 10.1007/s11657-006-0001-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Validation and comparative evaluation of four osteoporosis risk indexes in Moroccan menopausal women Abdellah El Maghraoui & Amine Habbassi & Mirieme Ghazi

More information

Association of plasma uric acid with ischemic heart disease and blood pressure:

Association of plasma uric acid with ischemic heart disease and blood pressure: Association of plasma uric acid with ischemic heart disease and blood pressure: Mendelian randomization analysis of two large cohorts. Tom M Palmer, Børge G Nordestgaard, DSc; Marianne Benn, Anne Tybjærg-Hansen,

More information

The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes appears

The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes appears ORIGINAL ARTICLE A 100K Genome-Wide Association Scan for Diabetes and Related Traits in the Framingham Heart Study Replication and Integration With Other Genome-Wide Datasets Jose C. Florez, 1,2,3 Alisa

More information

Supplementary figures

Supplementary figures Supplementary figures Supplementary Figure 1: Quantile-quantile plots of the expected versus observed -logp values for all studies participating in the first stage metaanalysis. P-values were generated

More information

Risk factors associated with low bone mineral density in Ajman, UAE

Risk factors associated with low bone mineral density in Ajman, UAE Risk factors associated with low bone mineral density in Ajman, UAE Tarek Fawsy 1, Jayadevan Sreedharan 2*, Jayakumary Muttappallymyalil 2, Salma Obaid Saeed Alshamsi 2, Mariyam Saif Salim Humaid Bin Bader

More information

Statistical Tests for X Chromosome Association Study. with Simulations. Jian Wang July 10, 2012

Statistical Tests for X Chromosome Association Study. with Simulations. Jian Wang July 10, 2012 Statistical Tests for X Chromosome Association Study with Simulations Jian Wang July 10, 2012 Statistical Tests Zheng G, et al. 2007. Testing association for markers on the X chromosome. Genetic Epidemiology

More information

Assessment and Treatment of Osteoporosis Professor T.Masud

Assessment and Treatment of Osteoporosis Professor T.Masud Assessment and Treatment of Osteoporosis Professor T.Masud Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust University of Nottingham University of Derby University of Southern Denmark What is Osteoporosis? Osteoporosis

More information

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in Dexa Total Body 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in Dexa Total Body 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1 Patient: Obese, Sample Birth Date: 0/Jan/966 44.4 years Height / Weight: 72.0 cm 95.0 kg Sex / Ethnic: Male Patient ID: Referring Physician: DR. SMITH Measured: 07/Jun/200 7:0:52 PM (.40) Analyzed: 02/Apr/203

More information

The genetics of complex traits Amazing progress (much by ppl in this room)

The genetics of complex traits Amazing progress (much by ppl in this room) The genetics of complex traits Amazing progress (much by ppl in this room) Nick Martin Queensland Institute of Medical Research Brisbane Boulder workshop March 11, 2016 Genetic Epidemiology: Stages of

More information

Association-heterogeneity mapping identifies an Asian-specific association of the GTF2I locus with rheumatoid arthritis

Association-heterogeneity mapping identifies an Asian-specific association of the GTF2I locus with rheumatoid arthritis Supplementary Material Association-heterogeneity mapping identifies an Asian-specific association of the GTF2I locus with rheumatoid arthritis Kwangwoo Kim 1,, So-Young Bang 1,, Katsunori Ikari 2,3, Dae

More information

DEXA SCAN POLICY CRITERIA BASED ACCESS

DEXA SCAN POLICY CRITERIA BASED ACCESS DEXA SCAN POLICY Version: 1718.v2 Recommendation by: Somerset CCG Clinical Commissioning Policy Forum (CCPF) Date Ratified: 01 November 2017 Name of Originator/Author: Approved by Responsible Committee/Individual:

More information

1) Postmenopausal invasive breast cancer case-control study nested within the NHS

1) Postmenopausal invasive breast cancer case-control study nested within the NHS Supplementary Methods Melanoma Discovery set in Harvard: 1) Postmenopausal invasive breast cancer case-control study nested within the NHS (CGEMS): Eligible cases in this study consisted of women with

More information

Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies

Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies STUDY DESIGNS Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies Pak C. Sham 1 and Shaun M. Purcell 2,3 Abstract Significance testing was developed as an objective method for summarizing

More information

Does Diet-Induced Weight Loss Lead to Bone Loss in Overweight or Obese Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Clinical Trials

Does Diet-Induced Weight Loss Lead to Bone Loss in Overweight or Obese Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Clinical Trials Does Diet-Induced Weight Loss Lead to Bone Loss in Overweight or Obese Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Clinical Trials Jessica Zibellini, 1 Radhika V Seimon, 1 Crystal MY Lee, 1 Alice

More information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Table of Contents Supplementary Materials and Methods... 1 1 Patients and control subjects for SNP genotyping... 2 1.1 Neuroblastoma patients in discovery case series... 2 1.2 Control subjects... 3 2 Whole-genome

More information

Annotations Part III Vertebral Fracture Initiative. International Osteoporosis Foundation March 2011

Annotations Part III Vertebral Fracture Initiative. International Osteoporosis Foundation March 2011 Annotations Part III Vertebral Fracture Initiative International Osteoporosis Foundation March 2011 Slide 1-3 Topics to be covered: What is vertebral fracture assessment? How does VFA compare to standard

More information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Rare independent mutations in renal salt handling genes contribute to blood pressure variation

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Rare independent mutations in renal salt handling genes contribute to blood pressure variation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Rare independent mutations in renal salt handling genes contribute to blood pressure variation Weizhen Ji, Jia Nee Foo, Brian J. O Roak, Hongyu Zhao, Martin G. Larson, David B.

More information

Fall-related risk factors and osteoporosis in older women referred to an open access bone densitometry service

Fall-related risk factors and osteoporosis in older women referred to an open access bone densitometry service Age and Ageing 05; 34: 67 71 Age and Ageing Vol. 34 No. 1 British Geriatrics Society 04; all rights reserved doi:10.1093/ageing/afh238 Published electronically 15 November 04 Fall-related risk factors

More information

Whole-genome detection of disease-associated deletions or excess homozygosity in a case control study of rheumatoid arthritis

Whole-genome detection of disease-associated deletions or excess homozygosity in a case control study of rheumatoid arthritis HMG Advance Access published December 21, 2012 Human Molecular Genetics, 2012 1 13 doi:10.1093/hmg/dds512 Whole-genome detection of disease-associated deletions or excess homozygosity in a case control

More information

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Single-Site vs Multisite Bone Density Measurement for Fracture Prediction

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Single-Site vs Multisite Bone Density Measurement for Fracture Prediction ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Single-Site vs Multisite Bone Density Measurement for Fracture Prediction William D. Leslie, MD, MSc; Lisa M. Lix, PhD; James F. Tsang, BSc; Patricia A. Caetano, PhD; for the Manitoba

More information

Prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis in older Australian men: findings from the CHAMP study

Prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis in older Australian men: findings from the CHAMP study Prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis in older Australian men: findings from the CHAMP study Kerrin Bleicher, Vasi Naganathan, Robert G Cumming, Markus J Seibel, Philip N Sambrook, Fiona M Blyth, David

More information

A total of 2,822 Mexican dyslipidemic cases and controls were recruited at INCMNSZ in

A total of 2,822 Mexican dyslipidemic cases and controls were recruited at INCMNSZ in Supplemental Material The N342S MYLIP polymorphism is associated with high total cholesterol and increased LDL-receptor degradation in humans by Daphna Weissglas-Volkov et al. Supplementary Methods Mexican

More information

Severe osteoarthritis of the hand associates with common variants within the ALDH1A2 gene and with rare variants at 1p31.

Severe osteoarthritis of the hand associates with common variants within the ALDH1A2 gene and with rare variants at 1p31. Severe osteoarthritis of the hand associates with common variants within the ALDH1A2 gene and with rare variants at 1p31. Styrkarsdottir, Unnur; Thorleifsson, Gudmar; Helgadottir, Hafdis T; Bomer, Nils;

More information

Learning Objectives. Controversies in Osteoporosis Prevention and Management. Etiology. Presenter Disclosure Information. Epidemiology.

Learning Objectives. Controversies in Osteoporosis Prevention and Management. Etiology. Presenter Disclosure Information. Epidemiology. 12:45 1:30pm Controversies in Osteoporosis Prevention and Management SPEAKER Carolyn Crandall, MD, MS Presenter Disclosure Information The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Carolyn

More information

GDF5 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism rs Is Associated With Lumbar Disc Degeneration in Northern European Women

GDF5 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism rs Is Associated With Lumbar Disc Degeneration in Northern European Women ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 63, No. 3, March 2011, pp 708 712 DOI 10.1002/art.30169 2011, American College of Rheumatology GDF5 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism rs143383 Is Associated With Lumbar Disc Degeneration

More information

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Cover Page. The handle  holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/45570 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Bömer, N. Title: Thyroid hormone signalling in Osteoarthritis: early life events

More information

Use of DXA / Bone Density in the Care of Your Patients. Brenda Lee Holbert, M.D. Associate Professor Senior Staff Radiologist

Use of DXA / Bone Density in the Care of Your Patients. Brenda Lee Holbert, M.D. Associate Professor Senior Staff Radiologist Use of DXA / Bone Density in the Care of Your Patients Brenda Lee Holbert, M.D. Associate Professor Senior Staff Radiologist Important Websites Resources for Clinicians and Patients www.nof.org www.iofbonehealth.org

More information

Using the FRAX Tool. Osteoporosis Definition

Using the FRAX Tool. Osteoporosis Definition How long will your bones remain standing? Using the FRAX Tool Gary Salzman M.D. Director Banner Good Samaritan/ Hayden VAMC Internal Medicine Geriatric Fellowship Program Phoenix, Arizona Using the FRAX

More information

2) Cases and controls were genotyped on different platforms. The comparability of the platforms should be discussed.

2) Cases and controls were genotyped on different platforms. The comparability of the platforms should be discussed. Reviewers' Comments: Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author) The manuscript titled 'Association of variations in HLA-class II and other loci with susceptibility to lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation' evaluated

More information

NGUYEN THI NGOC LAN- TAO THI MINH THUY

NGUYEN THI NGOC LAN- TAO THI MINH THUY ASSESSING THE RISK FACTORS FOR OSTEOPOROSIS AND PREDICTING FRACTURE RISK FOLLOWING FRAX MODEL IN WOMEN AGED FROM 50 YEARS AND ABOVE IN THE NORTHERN PART OF VIETNAM NGUYEN THI NGOC LAN- TAO THI MINH THUY

More information

Prevalence of vertebral fractures on chest radiographs of elderly African American and Caucasian women

Prevalence of vertebral fractures on chest radiographs of elderly African American and Caucasian women Osteoporos Int (2011) 22:2365 2371 DOI 10.1007/s00198-010-1452-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Prevalence of vertebral fractures on chest radiographs of elderly African American and Caucasian women D. Lansdown & B.

More information

DNBC application form

DNBC application form ref. 2011-27 Project title: Applicant: Other partners taking part in the project Names and work addresses: The association of early growth with wheezing and asthma Name: Agnes Sonnenschein-van der Voort,

More information

Title. Bow, CH; Tsang, SWY; Loong, CHN; Soong, CSS; Yeung, SC; Kung, AWC. Author(s)

Title. Bow, CH; Tsang, SWY; Loong, CHN; Soong, CSS; Yeung, SC; Kung, AWC. Author(s) Title Author(s) Bone mineral density enhances use of clinical risk factors in predicting ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men: The Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study Bow, CH; Tsang, SWY; Loong,

More information